On-farm risk factors for Salmonella Enteritidis contamination

Forty layer farms from 2 states participated in a study to examine the risk factors and incidence of Salmonella Enteritidis from multiple samples, including environmental drag swabs from the bird areas, feed, water, flies, rodents, live rodent traps, and environmental swabs from areas occupied by other livestock. Twenty-four of these farms had between 3,000 and 31,000 bird flocks (medium-sized flocks) and 16 had less than 3,000 birds (small-sized flocks). All were housed in cage-free production systems. Twenty-two farms included outside pasture areas for the birds. Most of the participants had just come under the FDA Egg Rule and had not yet tested their flocks (flocks under 3,000 birds are exempt) for Salmonella Enteritidis. Many, however, obtained their pullets from commercial Salmonella Enteritidis-clean breeder sources hatched in National Poultry Improvement Plan hatcheries. Vaccination against Salmonella Enteritidis was performed on 21 of the 40 farms (combination of live and killed vaccines). Salmonella Enteritidis was detected on 7 out of the 40 farms, primarily in rodents, their feces, or from swabs taken inside live traps. Of these 7 Salmonella Enteritidis-positive farms, 3 farms that had vaccinated their pullets with live Salmonella Typhimurium vaccine and killed-Salmonella Enteritidis vaccine; no Salmonella Enteritidis was isolated from the environmental drag swabs taken from the bird area or from the eggs on these farms. However, on the farms that had not vaccinated for Salmonella Enteritidis, the organism was isolated from 4 environmental drag swabs and 3 egg pools. The last 4 farms had flocks under 3,000 birds. No Salmonella Enteritidis was isolated from any of the samples of feed, flies, water, or swabs taken from other livestock areas. Based on the initial findings in this study, we suggest the 2 most important risk factors for Salmonella Enteritidis contamination inside the bird area and in the eggs in these small- and medium-sized flocks are the presence of infected rodents and the absence of an Salmonella Enteritidis vaccination program.     

文昌鱼鳃骨条基质蛋白的氨基酸组成

以传统的分离不溶性弹性蛋白的方法——热碱提取法处理新鲜解剖出来的文昌鱼鳃组织。收集不溶解的沉淀，进行氨基酸组成分析。并将分析结果与已知的七鳃鳗软骨和盲鳗软骨的不溶性残留物以及马蹄蟹鳃软骨、猪主动脉弹性蛋白以及胶原蛋白的氨基酸组成进行比较。结果表明，文昌鱼鳃骨条的基质蛋白是不溶性的非胶原的，其不溶于热碱的残留物具有特殊的氨基酸组成，且与弹性蛋白及各种不溶性类弹性蛋白的基质蛋白的氨基酸组成具有相似的特征。     

Assessment of thyroid function in dogs with low plasma thyroxine concentration

BACKGROUND: Differentiation between hypothyroidism and nonthyroidal illness in dogs poses specific problems, because plasma total thyroxine (TT4) concentrations are often low in nonthyroidal illness, and plasma thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations are frequently not high in primary hypothyroidism. HYPOTHESIS: The serum concentrations of the common basal biochemical variables (TT4, freeT4 [fT4], and TSH) overlap between dogs with hypothyroidism and dogs with nonthyroidal illness, but, with stimulation tests and quantitative measurement of thyroidal 99mTcO4(-) uptake, differentiation will be possible. ANIMALS: In 30 dogs with low plasma TT4 concentration, the final diagnosis was based upon histopathologic examination of thyroid tissue obtained by biopsy. Fourteen dogs had primary hypothyroidism, and 13 dogs had nonthyroidal illness. Two dogs had secondary hypothyroidism, and 1 dog had metastatic thyroid cancer. METHODS: The diagnostic value was assessed for (1) plasma concentrations of TT4, fT4, and TSH; (2) TSH-stimulation test; (3) plasma TSH concentration after stimulation with TSH-releasing hormone (TRH); (4) occurrence of thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAbs); and (5) thyroidal 99mTcO4(-) uptake. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of TT4, fT4, TSH, and the hormone pairs TT4/TSH and fT4/TSH overlapped in the 2 groups, whereas, with TgAbs, there was 1 false-negative result. Results of the TSH- and TRH-stimulation tests did not meet earlier established diagnostic criteria, overlapped, or both. With a quantitative measurement of thyroidal 99mTcO4(-) uptake, there was no overlap between dogs with primary hypothyroidism and dogs with nonthyroidal illness. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The results of this study confirm earlier observations that, in dogs, accurate biochemical diagnosis of primary hypothyroidism poses specific problems. Previous studies, in which the TSH-stimulation test was used as the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of hypothyroidism may have suffered from misclassification. Quantitative measurement of thyroidal 99mTcO- uptake has the highest discriminatory power with regard to the differentiation between primary hypothyroidism and nonthyroidal illness.