排序方式: 共有45条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
41.
[目的]研究吉林省大豆复叶面积及叶柄直径和长度的变化,为高产大豆的改良及种质资源研究提供参考。[方法]以吉林省1923年以来生产上主推的42个大豆品种的第4、10、16节位叶片为对象,研究复叶面积、叶柄长度和叶柄直径随年代变化的趋势。[结果]吉林省不同年代大豆复叶面积和叶柄的生长均呈"慢—快—慢"的"S"型曲线。叶片面积和叶柄的生长进程不同,叶柄长度的生长较叶片面积的生长推迟3~5d,较叶柄直径的生长推迟5~7d。大豆第4节位叶叶面积有随育成年代推进而增大的变化趋势,但第10和第16节位叶叶面积则随育成年代呈下降的变化趋势;大豆叶片的叶柄长度和直径在所有节位均随育成年代推进而增加。[结论]吉林省生产主推的大豆品种的底层叶面积递增,中层和上层的叶面积随年代的推进而递减;叶柄长度增长;叶柄直径增大。 相似文献
42.
43.
刺五加叶片组织培养研究 总被引:8,自引:0,他引:8
梁建萍 《山西农业大学学报(自然科学版)》2005,25(4):340-341
为扩大刺五加种群数量,以刺五加叶片、叶柄为外植体,以MS为基本培养基,研究了不同调节因子组合对愈伤组织诱导、分化的影响。结果表明,诱导刺五加叶片、叶柄形成愈伤组织的最佳培养基为MS+1.5 mgL-16-BA+1.5mgL-12,4-D,诱导率分别为86.70%、46.70%。最佳分化培养基为MS+2.0 mgL-16-BA+0.20 mgL-1NAA,叶片分化率达80.80%,叶柄分化率为53.33%,愈伤块形成芽丛的情况最好。 相似文献
44.
不同基因型甜菜叶柄的组织培养及植株的再生 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
本文报导了6种不同基因型甜菜叶柄的离体培养结果。实验通过预培养、诱导分化培养,获得了再生植株,建立了甜菜快速繁殖程序。结果表明:甜菜幼苗先经MSB附加一定量的6-苄氨基嘌呤(6-BA)和萘乙酸(NAA)组合的培养基中预培养,再取叶柄(带叶片)转入MS附加6-BA和NAA的培养基中诱导分化,不定芽发生频率为18.3%~47.5%,不同基因型材料,诱导率不同。采用MSB或MS大量元素减半,附加一定量的萘乙酸生根培养基,诱导生根率在80%以上,移栽成活率高达10%。 相似文献
45.
Kati W. Migliaccio Bruce Schaffer Frederick S. Davies 《Agricultural Water Management》2010,97(10):1452-1460
An irrigation study was conducted to determine the effects of implementing different irrigation practices on growth and yields of papaya plants in south Florida. Treatments included using automated switching tensiometers based on soil water status, irrigation based on ET calculated from historic weather data and a set schedule irrigation regime. The study consisted of two trials (2006-2007 and 2008-2009). Water volumes applied, plant height and diameter, leaf gas exchange, leaf petiole nutrient levels, fruit yields and fruit total soluble solids were measured throughout the study. For both trials, significantly more water was applied in the set schedule irrigation treatment than in all other treatments; historic ET and soil water based treatments received only about 31-36% of the water applied in the set schedule irrigation. Trunk diameter and plant height per unit water volume applied values for the set schedule treatment were significantly lower than those from all other treatments during both trials. The set schedule treatment in both trials also had the lowest crop production water use efficiency (CP-WUE); CP-WUE values among all other treatments were generally not significantly different from each other. Soil water and historic ET-based irrigation methods were identified as more sustainable practices compared to set schedule irrigation due to the lower water volumes applied while maintaining plant nutrient content, growth, photosynthetic rates, and fruit yields for this production system. 相似文献