基于工作流的城乡一体化地籍管理信息系统设计

随着我国城乡一体化进程的加快和信息技术的发展,传统的地籍管理信息系统模式不能满足现代地籍管理业务的需要。通过分析研究现阶段地籍管理信息系统存在的问题及其发展趋势,提出基于工作流的城乡一体化地籍管理信息系统这一现代地籍管理模式的概念框架,分析了地籍管理的工作流建模方式,实现日常地籍业务办公与地籍数据动态管理的结合和城乡一体化的地籍管理,并从总体结构、网络结构及功能模块等方面进行了分析并提出相应的解决方案。     

蔗糖多酯合成工艺的响应面法优化

蔗糖和油酸甲酯为原料,采用无溶剂两步法合成蔗糖多酯,应用响应面分析法对蔗糖多酯合成工艺条件进行优化.得出最佳合成条件为:反应物摩尔比11.79、催化剂用量2.06 g、反应温度138.06℃、反应时间5.80 h,在此条件下合成蔗糖多酯的产率为97.2%.     

间作茶园假眼小绿叶蝉种群动态与绿色防控技术研究

为了明确苏州地区间作茶园假眼小绿叶蝉种群动态与绿色防控技术,笔者于2015—2016年对苏州市东山镇洞庭碧螺春茶区不同间作茶园中假眼小绿叶蝉种群动态进行了系统调查和绿色防控技术研究。结果表明:纯茶园中种群数量大于间作茶园,且间作茶园中种群数量较纯茶园稳定。假眼小绿叶蝉在6月下旬和9中旬呈发生高峰期,利用物理、农业防治方法,如防虫网覆盖、黄板诱杀和茶树采后不修剪,可有效防治假眼小绿叶蝉。植物源农药0.3%苦参碱水剂药后3天的防效达76.11%。间作茶园可降低假眼小绿叶蝉种群数量从而减少茶园危害,并且在其发生高峰期进行绿色防控可以有效降低假眼小绿叶蝉危害,同时可减少农药使用次数2次,利用不同间作茶园构建绿色防控体系是实现茶叶绿色生产一项有效措施。     

新疆地区滴灌水肥一体化应用推广的影响因素研究

分析了新疆地区滴灌水肥一体化实施过程中影响应用推广的因素,探讨了水肥一体化中设备的影响、肥料的选择及影响施肥的因素、水肥一体化的局限性和发展方向,并提出相应的改进措施。     

番茄水肥一体化智能精准灌溉系统研究

研究设计出一套番茄生产高效、高产的自动化水肥一体化精准灌溉系统。该系统采用先进的微电脑技术、传感器技术,以高性能的单片计算机为核心,配合研究设定的番茄不同生长阶段所需肥水阈值,通过智能手机终端应用软件(APP)控制,实现番茄水肥一体化智能精准灌溉。该智能系统可以有效地提高温室番茄生产力和肥水利用效率,节约肥水资源的使用量,为现代农业生产提供有力的技术支撑。     

城市园林土壤板结机理及改良研究

为了改良城市园林板结土壤的质量,促进城市绿地持续、健康发展,对重庆市主城9区园林绿化板结土壤的容重、粗骨物质、有机质、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾、微生物种群数量、植物配置等理化及生物学性质进行了研究。结果表明,城市园林绿化土壤板结的主要原因是:(1)人为压实严重,土壤容重总平均值为(1.47±0.05)g/cm3,最高的可达1.72g/cm3;(2)粗骨物质多,各区含量总平均值为(40.2±4.43)%;(3)有机质含量低,总平均值为(27.2±1.1)g/kg;碱解氮、速效钾等有效养分含量偏低,总平均值分别为(39.4±1.1)mg/kg和(87.3±1.9)mg/kg;(4)植物配置不合理;(5)土壤微生物种群数量少,细菌数量、真菌数量和放线菌数量的总平均值分别为(29.71±7.8)×105cfu/g、(9.98±1.55)×103cfu/g和(7.6±1.64)×105cfu/g。基于城市园林土壤的板结机理,结合景观生态学、共生生物学原理,提出了改良城市园林板结土壤的综合配套改良技术。     

面向农业科技推广的资源整合研究——以海南省为例

整合相关组织及农业系统人力资源和从信息管理学的角度组织开发利用传播农业科技信息资源是构建农业科技推广网络体系过程中的重要内容。该研究通过海南省成功案例海南农业科技服务＂110＂的经验总结,提出如何从体制和机制上有效整合相关组织及农业系统人力资源的举措,使地区农业科技推广体系成为联结农业主管部门—农业科技研究者—农业科技推广者—农业科技应用者各个环节的平台,加快地区农业的发展。     

图书馆书目数据整合与归并的技术实现

不管是因为高校的合并,还是更换图书管理系统,高校图书馆都需要对文献资源实施统一规划和管理．因此,如何解决好书目数据的归并与整合成为一个关键问题。针对书目数据的整合与归并中涉及的数据的导出、拆分条码号、统一条码号长度、删除重复记录以及归并数据等几个问题展开讨论,并给出了具体的实现代码。     

Quantitative verification of the correspondence between the Welfare Quality® operational definition of farm animal welfare and the opinion of Flemish farmers,citizens and vegetarians

The Welfare Quality® project has developed an operational definition of farm animal welfare, which consists of 12 criteria grouped into four principles (‘good feeding’, ‘good housing’, ‘good health’ and ‘appropriate behaviour’). As part of a larger survey, 204 farmers, 72 vegetarians, and a representative sample of 459 adult citizens in Flanders (Belgium) scored the importance of each of the 12 criteria on a 1–10 scale, and divided 100 points across the four principles according to the perceived relative weights for farm animal welfare. These data were analysed to verify quantitatively whether (1) the grouping of 12 criteria into the four principles, and (2) the relative weights used by Welfare Quality® for aggregating the 12 criteria into an overall welfare judgement correspond with the perception of these three stakeholder groups from a region and setting not previously covered by Welfare Quality® studies. Moreover, the effects of various socio-demographic variables on the importance allocated to the welfare criteria and principles were investigated. Vegetarians and females gave consistently higher importance scores to all 12 criteria as compared with farmers, citizens and males, respectively, particularly for the (criteria belonging to the) principle ‘appropriate behaviour’. Farmers allocated more weight to ‘good feeding’ than did vegetarians or citizens. These differences confirm that farmers view animal welfare more in terms of biological functioning (instead of affective states or natural living) as compared to other citizens, and vegetarians in particular. As the concept has a different meaning to different people, any operational definition of animal welfare is unlikely to match equally well with the perception of every single stakeholder group or person. The structure of the Welfare Quality® operational definition with the 12 criteria aggregated into four principles, corresponds well with the opinion of the stakeholders as they judged all 12 criteria as rather important to extremely important for farm animal welfare. Factor analysis restricted to contain four factors confirmed the grouping of the criteria into the correct principles. Exploratory factor analysis using Eigenvalues > 1 as extraction criterion indicated, however, that from the citizen perspective two principles (‘good feeding & health’ and ‘appropriate behaviour & housing’) rather than four would suffice. The main discrepancy with the Welfare Quality® approach concerns the aggregation procedure: the stakeholders did not consider all four principles as equally important, and the relative importance allocated to criteria corresponded poorly across principles. Some of these discrepancies were consistent across the three different stakeholder groups.     

对推进城乡一体化政策工具选择的思考

在我国城乡一体化建设的背景下,针对城市化进程不同阶段的地区加快推进城乡一体化,提出了不同的政策工具选择:城市化初级阶段的地区主要采取城乡统一的制度安排———户籍管理、市场体系、公共服务、社会保障、土地经营、公共财政。城市化中级阶段的地区除要求城乡统一性制度安排外,还必须保证连接城乡的基础设施建设——交通基础设施、信息通信服务设施。城市化高级阶段的地区要求实行城乡统一的制度安排、连接城乡的基础设施和针对农村地区的干预性措施———特色产业、居住方式、文化方式。