数字环境下音乐院校图书馆服务创新探讨——以《西北民族音乐学术资源数据库》建设为例

在网络技术迅速发展的今天,图书馆传统的服务模式已经无法满足读者对文献信息资源的需求。文章论述了数字环境下图书馆的发展变化和图书馆开展服务创新的必要性,以西安音乐学院图书馆《西北民族音乐学术资源数据库》的建设为例,阐述了音乐院校图书馆改变传统服务观念,为师生提供主动服务、知识服务的工作实践。     

从个案调查辨析改进院校图书馆管理服务

通过对某专业院校图书馆文献借阅情况调查,就改进院校图书馆管理,优化读者服务谈了一些看法。侧重于研究教学型的专业院校图书馆作讨论。     

加强图书馆信息传播建设的建议和措施——以黑龙江科技学院图书馆为例

高校图书馆是高校信息传播的主体,以黑龙江科技学院图书馆为例,根据高校图书馆信息传播的特点,提出了加强本校图书馆信息传播的建议和措施。     

Readers＇ Participation： Thoughts and Its Application in Building Attention in Digital Academic Libraries

信息时代，图书馆的信息中介职能减弱了，图书馆的发展必须寻找新的增长点。重视注意力资源建设，探索与之相适应的资源获取和维持策略已成为研究焦点。为此，高校数字图书馆应打破旧有的观点，积极引入读者参与资源建设、管理、开发，面向社会开放，走知识服务的市场化道路。     

浅谈高校图书馆队伍建设

高校图书馆专业队伍建设是整个高校图书馆事业发展中一个关键性的问题。通过对高校图书馆的队伍现状进行分析,论述了高校图书馆对馆员素质的具体要求,阐释了高素质馆员队伍在高校图书馆现代化建设中的作用,并对如何建设高素质的馆员队伍提出了对策。     

专业图书馆出版物国际交换新模式探索——以江苏省农业科学院图书馆为例

出版物国际交换（简称国际交换）不论是在出版物国际流通方面还是在图书馆资源建设方面都有重要作用。但专业图书馆的国际交换工作一直停滞不前。随着出国访问科技人员的增多,以他们为桥梁,在访问期间与交流单位沟通,在交换文献资料的基础上建立长期、稳定的交换关系,将是专业图书馆发展国际交换的一种有效途径。     

火生态因子对草原的效应及有计划用火的研究

火烧可以提高禾草类的生物量25—30%,可以快速地(当年)大幅度提高羊草种群的生物量达100%以上。火烧提高羊草的抽穗率,促进草群更新复壮。火烧可以有效地抑制针茅种群的增长,并改变群落中的种群分布格局,促进羊草种群形成均匀分布格局,扩大羊草种群在群落中的生态位。火烧对草原的总生产力不发生负效应,一次火烧的正效应可持续2—3年。基于以上的结果,我们认为锡林郭勒草原区中,东部含有羊草的草原群落,可在春季四月下旬进行火烧,将会取得良好的效果。     

羊草草原对喷施稀土元素的生理生态学反应

稀土元素在农作物中的应用已取得了很好的效果。本文则把稀土元素应用到天然羊草草原上,通过喷施稀土元素的小区试验,调查羊草的株高、叶长、叶宽、鲜重和干重,发现喷施稀土元素能促进羊草的生长,增加植株重量。因此,对羊草草原喷施稀土元素是一条提高草地生产力的有希望途径。     

The community idea in American country life

The American Country LifeAssociation was heir to Theodore Roosevelt'sCountry Life Commission, which examined thegeneral conditions of farming life in the opencountry, and...its larger problems. In1919, Kenyon Butterfield, a member ofRoosevelt's Commission, met withrepresentatives from 30 states and 25 nationalorganizations to form the American Country LifeAssociation. In that year, Butterfield, ACLA'sfirst president, published a book, TheFarmer and the New Day, whose defining chapterwas The Making of Communities: The CommunityIdea. The ACLA was educator created and led.Solutions to rural problems were seen aseducational matters. But educational philosophywas undergoing scrutiny and new educationalconcepts were arising from the bustling,industrializing, urbanizing times of late19th century. The experimental,unconstrained spirit of the nation at the turnof the century was formalized as pragmatism. Aleading pragmatist and educator of the time wasJohn Dewey, a contemporary of Butterfield.The communitarianism of Butterfield and Deweycarried throughout the life of ACLA in avariety of forms. Even after ACLA ended as anorganization in 1976, the concerns and idealscontinued in successor organizations, and canbe found in environmental, sustainableagriculture, and rural life organizationstoday. This paper traces one of continuingthemes of the ACLA, the community idea as a wayof adding a social dimension to agriculture'seconomic policies and development. The ACLAstory is a metaphor for country life throughmuch of 20th century America. ACLA is alsoa lesson in how organizations come into being,flourish, falter, die, and leave their legaciesto future generations.     

Defining urban forestry – A comparative perspective of North America and Europe

Urban forestry is generally defined as the art, science and technology of managing trees and forest resources in and around urban community ecosystems for the physiological, sociological, economic, and aesthetic benefits trees provide society. First mentioned in the United States as early as in 1894, the concept underwent a revival during the 1960s as a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach to the specific challenges related to growing trees in urban environments. Later, urban forestry evoked the interest of scientists and practitioners in other parts of the world. However, harmonization of urban forestry terminology has been complicated by, for example, the involvement of different disciplines and translation difficulties. In many European languages, for example, the direct translation of ‘urban forestry’ relates more to forest ecosystems than to street and park trees. Efforts in North America and Europe defining ‘urban forest’, ‘urban forestry’ and related terms are introduced. A comparative analysis of selected urban forestry terminology in both parts of the world shows that urban forestry has a longer history in North America, based on traditions of shade tree management. Moreover, urban forestry has become more institutionalized in North America. Urban forestry in Europe has built strongly on a century-long tradition of ‘town forestry’. In both parts of the world, definitions of urban forestry and urban forest have become more comprehensive, including all tree stands and individual trees in and around urban areas. Agreement also exists on the multifunctional and multidisciplinary character of urban forestry. These similarities offer opportunities for international harmonization of terminology.