Effects of hydrochlorothiazide and diet in dogs with calcium oxalate urolithiasis

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) reduces urinary calcium excretion in dogs with calcium oxalate urolithiasis. DESIGN: Original study. ANIMALS: 8 dogs with calcium oxalate urolithiasis. PROCEDURE: 4 treatment protocols were evaluated in each dog (a low calcium, low protein diet designed to prevent calcium oxalate urolith formation with and without administration of HCTZ [2 mg/kg (0.9 mg/lb) of body weight, PO, q 12 h] and a maintenance diet with higher quantities of protein and calcium with and without administration of HCTZ). At the end of each 2-week treatment period, 24-hour urine samples were collected. Blood samples were collected during the midpoint of each urine collection period. Analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the effects of HCTZ and diet on urine and serum analytes. RESULTS: Hydrochlorothiazide significantly decreased urine calcium and potassium concentration and excretion. Hydrochlorothiazide also significantly decreased serum potassium concentration. Compared with the maintenance diet, the urolith prevention diet significantly decreased urine calcium and oxalic acid concentration and excretion. Dogs consuming the urolith prevention diet had significantly lower serum concentrations of albumin and urea nitrogen. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of HCTZ decreased urine calcium excretion in dogs with a history of calcium oxalate urolith formation. The greatest reduction in urine calcium concentration and excretion was achieved when dogs received HCTZ and the urolith prevention diet. Results of this study suggest that the hypocalciuric effect of HCTZ will minimize recurrence of calcium oxalate urolith formation in dogs; however, long-term controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of HCTZ.     

Serotyping of Haemophilus paragallinarum isolates from Mexico by the Kume hemagglutinin scheme

A total of 42 isolates of Haemophilus paragallinarum from Mexico were serotyped by the Kume hemagglutinin scheme. Serovars A-1, A-2, B-1, and C-2 were recognized among 11 (26.2%), 7 (16.6%), 4 (9.5%), and 14 (33.3%) isolates, respectively. A further six isolates (14.3%) showed hemagglutinating activity but could not be classified into any serovar. Commercial vaccines containing Kume serovars A-1, A-2, B-1, and C-2 may provide better protection than those bi- or trivalent infectious coryza vaccines currently used in Mexico.     

Safety and efficacy of in ovo administration of infectious bursal disease viral vaccines

In ovo vaccination against Marek's disease virus and infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) in commercial broilers in the United States is common. Little information exists as to the safety and efficacy of intermediate IBDV vaccines given in ovo. Experiments were initiated to determine the safety and efficacy of three commercially available live intermediate IBDV vaccines by in ovo route. Commonly used vaccines were given at 18 days of embryonation to specific-pathogen-free (SPF) broiler embryos (first and second study) or to commercial broiler embryos (third study) that had maternal antibody against IBDV. When any of the antigenic standard vaccines was given at full dose to SPF embryos, embryonic and 3-wk posthatch mortality increased. Vaccines also caused significant microscopic lesions in the bursa of Fabricius at 1 and 3 wk posthatch. In contrast, there was no adverse effect on embryonic or posthatch mortality when vaccines were given at half dose to SPF or commercial broiler embryos. However, significant microscopic lesions were evident at 1 and 3 wk posthatch in the bursae of SPF embryos given the vaccines at half dose. When vaccines were given at half dose to commercial broiler embryos, lesions were evident at 1 but not 3 wk of age. In the third study, in ovo vaccinated chickens were challenged with either a virulent standard (APHIS) or antigenic variant (variant E) IBDV virus at 3 wk of age. All vaccines produced at least 87% protection against the standard and 60% protection against the variant challenge IBDV, as measured by bursal weight to body weight ratios. This study was the first to examine the safety and efficacy of the three commonly used intermediate IBDV vaccines given in ovo in protection against standard and antigenic variant IBDV challenge viruses.