The effect of levels of concentrate in feedlot diets on the health status of beef calves

In this two year study we investigated the effect that the level of concentrate in feedlot diet had on the occurrence of health problems in bull calves belonging to two multibreed groups.

In each of the two years, the 168 day feedlot period was divided into two equal periods of 77 days with an intervening 14 day adjustment period. During the first period, the animals in half of the pens within each breed-group received a high concentrate (85% grain) diet (H) while the rest of the pens received a diet (L) of hay ad libitum and half as much concentrate as the bulls on high concentrate. The L diet contained an average of 48% grain. In the second period, diets of bulls in half of the pens within each breed-group were switched from L to H and vice versa. During the feedlot period, the incidence of sickness among bulls was recorded. Disease incidence was higher in the second year compared to the first. In the second year, 49 out of 56 (87.5%) calves on the high concentrate diet required treatment for respiratory infections compared to only four (7.14%) in bulls on the low concentrate diet. The results suggest that a high concentrate diet for animals in feedlots may be more stressful to calves coming directly to the feedlot following weaning compared to a low concentrate diet, thereby acting as an additional predisposing factor to respiratory infections.

     

Evaluation of mono- and polyclonal antibody-based antigen detection immunoassays for diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi infection in the dromedary camel.

Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), one based on a mouse anti-Trypanosoma brucei group-specific monoclonal antibody and the other on rabbit anti-Trypanosoma evansi polyclonal antibodies, have been evaluated for their ability to detect circulating trypanosome antigens in camel sera as a means for the diagnosis of T. evansi infections. All 91 sera from a negative control camel herd from Kenya gave negative antigen-ELISA results in the monoclonal antibody-based ELISA and only 2 of them (2.2%) gave false positive results in the polyclonal antibody-based ELISA. In subsequent analyses of sera from infected camels (as determined by mouse inoculation), the monoclonal antibody-based ELISA detected antigens in 90 (83.3%) out of the 108 sera tested. This percentage was lower for the polyclonal antibody-based ELISA which was able to detect antigens in 67 (60.9%) out of the 110 sera tested. The two tests detected probably different antigens and when the results were combined, 99 out of 107 (92.5%) sera were shown to be ELISA positive. In a survey involving 316 camels from the Gao and Nara areas, in Mali, a high proportion of animals tested were antigen positive (43.5 and 42.9%, respectively for the mono- and polyclonal antibody-based ELISA) compared to only 22 (7.0%) diagnosed by the parasite detection techniques. Thus, these immunoassays were at least six times more sensitive than the haematocrit centrifugation technique. As a large proportion of cases may be antigen positive but parasite negative, these two of "surra" immunoassays should be used in routine diagnosis in addition to the parasite detection techniques in the dromedary camel.     

Prospects for biological control of nematode parasites of ruminants

Control of nematode parasites in ruminants is directed almost exclusively at the parasitic stage in the host using conventional anthelmintic therapy. However, to complete their life cycle, parasites have to develop through a series of free-living stages on pasture. It is within this environment that there is a vast range of cohabiting micro-organisms, some of which are known to infect or prey on nematodes. These include bacteria, protozoa, viruses and fungi. To date, most interest has been focused on those organisms producing chemical toxins which have been developed as anthelmintics, e.g. Streptomyces/avermectins. Yet the potential of predacious and nematoxic fungi and bacteria for the biological control of nematode parasites of livestock remains largely untapped. These organisms may well offer a cheaper and more sustainable approach to reducing the impact of parasitism in livestock.