Efficacy and toxicity of oxidative disinfectants for the removal of gill amoebae from the gills of amoebic gill disease affected Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in freshwater

Amoebic gill disease (AGD) of Atlantic salmon is treated commercially by bathing affected fish in freshwater. Recently, the efficacy of freshwater bathing has been questioned, and the aim of this study was to examine the potential for improving bathing efficacy using additives to the freshwater bath. AGD‐affected Atlantic salmon were bathed in 350 L tanks containing oxygenated freshwater to which chlorine dioxide (0–50 mg L^?1), chloramine‐T (0–50 mg L^?1) or hydrogen peroxide (0–100 μL L^?1) was added. Before and following a 3‐h exposure to the freshwater and chemical additive, the gills were removed from a sub‐sample of fish and the number of live amoebae on the gills were counted and smears made for confirmation of the presence of Neoparamoeba pemaquidensis, the causative agent of AGD. Following a further 3‐h exposure, a sub‐sample of fish was bled from the caudal vein and the gills were removed for histological examination. Chlorine dioxide and chloramine‐T at 25–50 and 10–50 mg L^?1, respectively, reduced the number of amoebae on the gills by approximately 50% compared with pre‐exposure numbers. The results from hydrogen peroxide treatment were equivocal and the toxicity of hydrogen peroxide was high. The toxicity of chlorine dioxide varied with freshwater hardness and/or suspended solid load, whereas chloramine‐T toxicity was low, with mortalities attributable only to elevated temperatures at the highest concentration tested. In conclusion, chlorine dioxide and chloramine‐T show promise as potential freshwater additives for the improved removal of N. pemaquidensis and possibly, other amoebae from the gills of commercially farmed Atlantic salmon.     

Intraocular pressure in normal llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Lama pacos)

Objective: To determine the mean intraocular pressure in llamas ( Lama glama ) and alpacas ( Lama pacos ) using applanation tonometry. Animals studied: Ten llamas and 10 alpacas. Procedures: Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with a Tono-Pen™ XL (Mentor Ophthalmics, Inc., Norwell, MA, USA). Three values, with 5% variance, were recorded for each eye. Least-squares means were determined for IOP for each eye of llamas and alpacas. Controlling for age, differences between left and right eye were analyzed using anova . Two age groups were established, less than 5 years and greater than 5 years. The effect of age on IOP within each group was analyzed by linear regression. Probability values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Comparison of mean IOP between right ( n  = 20) and left eyes ( n  = 20), independent of species type, showed no differences in IOPs for llamas and alpacas. Mean IOP declined with increasing age in llamas and alpacas. Mean IOPs for 20 eyes in 10 llamas was 16.96 ± 3.51 mmHg. Mean IOP for 20 eyes in 10 alpacas was 16.14 ± 3.74 mmHg. Mean IOP for all eyes ( n  = 40), independent of species, was 16.55 ± 3.55 mmHg. The range of IOP in normal llamas and alpacas within 2 SD (95% of the population) was 14.89±18.21 mmHg. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in IOP between alpacas and llamas. Mean IOP in both species decreased with increased age.