Availability to rhodesgrass (Chloris gayana) of nitrogen in tops and roots added to soil

¹⁵N-labelled Rhodesgrass material was prepared by growing plants in sand culture with labelled ammonium sulphate as their source of nitrogen. In a greenhouse experiment the labelled plant material in various physical configurations was added to an alluvial soil (fine sandy loam) from Samford with or without added mineral nitrogen. Two crops (six harvests) of Rhodesgrass were grown in the soil and the recovery of labelled nitrogen followed with time. Its partition at the end of the experiment was also determined.In general, after 16 months about one-third was recovered in the plant and two-thirds remained in the soil (plus any undecomposed added plant material). The only indication of volatile losses was a probable deficit of up to 10 per cent where litter (above-ground material) was placed on the soil surface.A higher nitrogen concentration in litter (1.3 per cent compared with 0.8 per cent) resulted in only a slight increase in labelled nitrogen recovery. Addition of mineral nitrogen (six doses of 50 kg N/ha) increased recovery from added litter material from 22 to 28 per cent and from added root material from 23 to 30 per cent.Grinding of added root material did not affect recovery. In the litter experiment, placing on the surface, incorporating in the top 2.5 cm of soil. and grinding and mixing with the soil resulted in final recoveries of 14, 28 and 32 per cent respectively.It is pointed out that caution must be exercised in extrapolation of results from laboratory and greenhouse studies to the field because many of the treatments used in the former are not analogous to field practices.     

The advantages and disadvantages of endoscopy

Endoscopy is generally a very safe and effective tool in the diagnosis and therapy of various gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, and must be used in conjunction with other diagnostic modalities. Endoscopy should not be a substitute for a complete work-up. There are many advantages of endoscopy, including minimal morbidity and mortality, and the sensitivity of this modality in the diagnosis of mucosal disorders of the GI tract. However, complications may occur, and there are limitations to endoscopy. This article will provide an overview of when to choose GI endoscopy and when other procedures might provide more information.     

Comparison of three techniques for estimating the forage intake of lactating dairy cows on pasture

Quantifying DMI is necessary for estimation of nutrient consumption by ruminants, but it is inherently difficult on grazed pastures and even more so when supplements are fed. Our objectives were to compare three methods of estimating forage DMI (inference from animal performance, evaluation from fecal output using a pulse-dose marker, and estimation from herbage disappearance methods) and to identify the most useful approach or combination of approaches for estimating pasture intake by lactating dairy cows. During three continuous 28-d periods in the winter season, Holstein cows (Bos taurus; n = 32) grazed a cool-season grass or a cool-season grass-clover mixture at two stocking rates (SR; 5 vs. 2.5 cows/ha) and were fed two rates of concentrate supplementation (CS; 1 kg of concentrate [as-fed] per 2.5 or 3.5 kg of milk produced). Animal response data used in computations for the animal performance method were obtained from the latter 14 d of each period. For the pulse-dose marker method, chromium-mordanted fiber was used. Pasture sampling to determine herbage disappearance was done weekly throughout the study. Forage DMI estimated by the animal performance method was different among periods (P < 0.001; 6.5, 6.4, and 9.6 kg/d for Periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively), between SR (P < 0.001; 8.7 [low SR] vs. 6.3 kg/d [high SR]) and between CS (P < 0.01; 8.4 [low CS] vs. 6.6 kg/d [high CS]). The period and SR effect seemed to be related to forage mass. The pulse-dose marker method generally provided greater estimates of forage DMI (as much as 11.0 kg/d more than the animal performance method) and was not correlated with the other methods. Estimates of forage DMI by the herbage disappearance method were correlated with the animal performance method. The difference between estimates from these two methods, ranging from -4.7 to 5.4 kg/d, were much lower than their difference from pulse-dose marker estimates. The results of this study suggest that, when appropriate for the research objectives, the animal performance or herbage disappearance methods may be useful and less costly alternatives to using the pulse-dose method.     

Use of topical povidone-iodine dressings in the management of mycotic rhinitis in three dogs

Three dogs with mycotic rhinitis were treated with a proprietary wound dressing product intended to produce a sustained release of povidone-iodine. All of the dogs had been refractory to other treatments. One dog had extensive soft tissue involvement, including extension into the orbital tissues, and another had evidence of involvement of the supporting bones of the nose. In all cases, the affected nasal cavity and/or frontal sinus was exposed via a dorsal approach and partial turbinectomy was performed. The wound dressing was applied and retained with a 'tie-over' dressing. The dressing was replaced every 48 to 72 hours until all exposed tissue was covered by healthy granulation tissue, at which time the rhinotomy was closed by soft tissue reconstruction. There was no evidence of recurrence of the fungal infection at follow-up times of up to 20 months postsurgery.