Pearl millet (
Pennisetum glaucum) is cultivated across a wide range of environments ranging from extremely stressful to favourable. The objective of this research was to compare methods to identify productive cultivars for stress and non-stress conditions. Thirty pearl millet cultivars were evaluated at 22 locations that were grouped as stress, non-stress, or intermediate environments. Five selection indices viz., arithmetic mean (AM), geometric mean (GM), AM (standard units), stress susceptibility index (
S) and drought response index (DRI) were calculated for each genotype to determine correlation between selection indices and yield under stress (
YS), non-stress (
YNS), and average conditions (
YAV). Both cultivars and locations were significant sources of variation. Phenology of cultivars had different influence on yielding ability in contrasting environments. While earliness was advantageous for stress conditions, cultivars with longer duration tended to yield more under non-stress conditions.
YS was only moderately determined by
YNS. Both AM and GM were suitable indices for selection of cultivars that would perform well across stress, non-stress, and intermediate environments. Stress susceptibility index (
S) was negatively correlated with
YS (
r=−0.62
**) but should only be used as a selection criterion in combination with yield under stress (
YS) to identify cultivars adapted to stress environments. DRI was positively correlated with
YS but had no association with
YNS. Results indicated that DRI might be useful for identifying cultivars with high performance under stress particularly when days to flower differ considerably among test entries.
相似文献