Der Kokon von Campoplex angustatus Thoms. (Hym., Ichneumonidae)

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Structure-activity relationships of triazinone herbicides on resistant weeds and resistant Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Weeds resistant to the s-triazine herbicide atrazine also show resistance to the triazinone herbicide metribuzin. However, with highly lipophilic triazinones, thylakoids isolated from atrazine-resistant Amaranthus retroflexus (mutation at position Ser₂₆₄ of the photosystem II D-1 reaction centre protein) in general show a higher pI₅₀ value in photosystem II electron transport than those from the wild type (i.e. negative cross-resistance; ‘supersensitivity’). A quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) can be established, wherein the lipophilicity of the compound plays a major role. In in-vivo experiments, it was found that the triazinone DRW2698 killed resistant Amaranthus retroflexus and Chenopodium album whereas the wild type was almost unaffected. Triazinones were further investigated in five different mutants of Chlamydomonas rheinhardtii (mutations in the D-1 protein at positions Ser₂₆₄, Ala₂₅₁, Leu₂₇₅, Phe₂₅₅, and Val²¹⁹). Inhibitory activity of all triazinones was generally enhanced in the Phe₂₅₅ mutant but decreased in the Val₂₁₉ mutant. In the other mutants, biological activity was decreased when position 3 of the triazinone was substituted by CH₃, OCH₃, SCH₃, NHCH₃ or N(CH₃)₂. However, negative cross-resistance was again observed when this position was occupied by free thiol. It is therefore suggested that these two groups of triazinones orient themselves differently within the herbicide binding niche of the photosystem II D-1 protein.     

Biochemical and toxicological differences in the modes of action of the benzoylureas

The two insecticidal benzoylurea compounds, diflubenzuron and chlorfluazuron, show large differences in their toxicity against the larvae of insects like the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens, or the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis, chlorfluazuron being about 100 times more toxic. This difference is due mainly to a much faster metabolism of diflubenzuron. Its half-life within the larvae is about 5 h, compared to about 50 h for chlorfluazuron. Chlorfluazuron is also the much better ovicide of the two, following injection of the compounds into the females of H. virescens. Again the difference in the rate of metabolism is the main cause. The rate of excretion of the parent benzoylureas is relatively low, but their metabolites are excreted very quickly.     

Induced Disease Resistance in Plants by Chemicals

Plants can be induced locally and systemically to become more resistant to diseases through various biotic or abiotic stresses. The biological inducers include necrotizing pathogens, non- pathogens or root colonizing bacteria. Through at network of signal pathways they induce resistance spectra and marker proteins that are characteristic for the different plant species and activation systems. The best characterized signal pathway for systemically induced resistance is SAR (systemic acquired resistance) that is activated by localized infections with necrotizing pathogens. It is characterized by protection against a broad range of pathogens, by a set of induced proteins and by its dependence on salicylic acid (SA) Various chemicals have been discovered that seem to act at various points in these defense activating networks and mimic all or parts of the biological activation of resistance. Of these, only few have reached commercialization. The best- studied resistance activator is acibenzolar-5-methyl (BION). At low rates it activates resistance in many crops against a broad spectrum of diseases, including fungi, bacteria and viruses. In monocots, activated resistance by BION typically is very long lasting, while the lasting effect is less pronounced in dicots. BION is translocated systemically in plants and can take the place of SA in the natural SAR signal pathway, inducing the same spectrum of resistance and the same set of molecular markers. Probenazole (ORYZEMATE) is used mainly on rice against rice blast and bacterial leaf blight. Its mode of action is not well understood partly because biological systems of systemically induced resistance are not well defined in rice. Treated plants clearly respond faster and in a resistant manner to infections by the two pathogens. Other compounds like beta-aminobutyric acid as wdl as extracts from plants and microorganisms have also been described as resistance inducers. For most of these, neither the mode of action nor reliable pre-challenge markers are known and still other pathways for resistance activation are suspected. Resistance inducing chemicals that are able to induce broad disease resistance offer an additional option for the farmer to complement genetic disease resistance and the use of fungicides. If integrated properly in plant health management programs, they can prolong the useful life of both the resistance genes and the fungicides presently used.