The efficacy of used engine oil against ticks on cattle

The study was conducted in a peri-urban agricultural system at Botshabelo, a city in the south-eastern Free State. A questionnaire survey revealed that 88.5% of cattle farmers in the area experienced problems related to ticks and tick-borne diseases. Because of the cost of commercial acaricides the Botshabelo farmers use alternative, cheaper methods of tick control, including the application of used engine oil. The specific aim of the study was to determine whether used engine oil can effectively control ticks on cattle. From March to August 1996 the tick burdens of ten control animals and six animals treated by their owner with used engine oil were compared. The total tick burdens for the 6 month period differed significantly between the two experimental groups. The efficacy of the used engine oil on the treated group varied between 15.1% and 64.8% with a mean of 38.1%. Although commercial acaricides can be more cost-effective, the application of used engine oil can be useful to reduce tick numbers on cattle during periods of peak abundance. Another advantage in that the use of the oil will not influence existing endemic stability of Anaplasma marginale and Babesia bigemina infections because of the residual tick burdens after treatment.     

Affinity of detomidine, medetomidine and xylazine for alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtypes

α₂-Adrenergic receptor agonists are widely used in veterinary medicine as sedative/hypnotic agents. Four pharmacological subtypes of the α₂-adrenergic receptor (A, B, C and D) have been identified based primarily on differences in affinity for several drugs. The purpose of this study was to examine the affinities of the sedative agents, xylazine, detomidine and medetomidine at the four α₂-adrenergic receptor subtypes. Saturation and inhibition binding curves were performed in membranes of tissues containing only one subtype of a₂-adrenergic receptor. The K_D for the α₂-adrenergic receptor radioligand, [³H]-MK-912, in HT29 cells (α_2A-), neonatal rat lung (α_2B-), OK cells (α_2C-) and PC12 cells transfected with RG20 (α_2D-) were 0.38 ± 0.08 n m , 0.70 ± 0.5 n m , 0.07 ± 0.02 n m and 0.87 ± 0.03 n m , respectively. Detomidine and medetomidine had approximately a 100 fold higher affinity for all the α₂-adrenergic receptors compared to xylazine but neither agonist displayed selectivity for the α₂-adrenergic receptor subtypes. These data suggest that available sedative/hypnotic α₂-adrenergic receptor agonists can not discriminate between the four known α₂-adrenergic receptor subtypes.