Environmental and inoculum effects on epidemiology of bacterial spot disease of stone fruits and development of a disease forecasting system

Bacterial spot disease of stone fruits, caused by Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni, is of high economic importance in the major stone-fruit-producing areas worldwide. A better understanding of disease epidemiology can be valuable in developing disease management strategies. The effects of weather variables (temperature and wet/dry period) on epiphytic growth of X. arboricola pv. pruni on Prunus leaves were analyzed, and the relationship between inoculum density and temperature on disease development was determined and modeled. The information generated in this study, performed under controlled environmental conditions, will be useful to develop a forecasting system for X. arboricola pv. pruni. Optimal temperature for growth of epiphytic populations ranged from 20 to 30 °C under leaf wetness. In contrast, multiplication of epiphytic populations was not only interrupted under low relative humidity (RH) (< 40%) at 25 °C, but also resulted in cell inactivation, with only 0.001% initial cells recovered after 72 h incubation. A significant effect of inoculum density on disease severity was observed and 10⁶ CFU/ml was determined as the minimal infective dose for X. arboricola pv. pruni on Prunus. Infections occurred at temperatures from 15 to 35 °C, but incubation at 25 and 30 °C gave the shortest incubation periods (7.7 and 5.9 days respectively). A model for predicting disease symptom development was generated and successfully evaluated, based on the relationship between disease severity and the accumulated heat expressed in cumulative degree day (CDD). Incubation periods of 150, 175 and 280 CDD were required for 5, 10 and 50% of disease severity, respectively.     

STREP: a brown‐spot disease predictor for scheduling fungicide sprays against Stemphylium vesicarium on pear*

Brown spot of pear (Pyrus communis) caused by Stemphylium vesicarium is an important disease in fruit‐growing areas of Europe. The control of brown spot is based on protectant sprays of fungicide applied, at 7‐ to 15‐day intervals depending on the type of fungicide, from fruit set to preharvest regardless of the risk of infection. A forecasting model has been developed and can be used for timing the fungicide applications and to eliminate unnecessary sprays. The model quantifies the relationship between wetness duration and temperature in disease severity and can be used as a tool for the prediction of disease infection periods. The capacity of risk prediction was validated over 2 years. The fungicide sprays scheduled by the STREP forecaster were evaluated in commercial orchards during 3 years in different climatic areas in Spain and Italy. The results showed consistently that use of the STREP model minimized the number of fungicide sprays compared with a protectant schedule, but without decreasing the quality of commercial disease control. The susceptibility of selected European pear cultivars to infection by S. vesicarium and the influence of fruit age were also determined. The implementation of the model in warning stations will require the combination of predictions by the STREP model, the level of inoculum and the sensitivity of phenological stage and pear cultivar.     

Evaluation of drench treatments with phosphonate derivatives against Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on pear under controlled environment conditions

Several phosphonate derivatives including theoomycetic antifungal agents phosphonate andtris-o-ethylphosphonate (fosetyl), theethylene-releasing compound 2-chloroethylphosphonate(ethephon), and the antibiotic2-epoxypropylphosphonate (phosphomycin) were evaluatedfor in vitro and in planta activityagainst Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae.Inhibition of colony growth in CYE agar byphosphonate, fosetyl and etephon was very slight(minimal inhibitory concentrations MIC= 0.31–;0.62 gHP /l). Also, survival of P. syringae pv. syringae in aqueous solutions ofphosphonate or fosetyl was high. Only phosphomycinshowed significant antibacterial activity invitro (MIC=10-20 µg HP /ml) comparedto streptomycin (1-2 µg a.i./ml). Potted pearplants irrigated with these chemicals and inoculatedwith Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae had significantly less disease than non-treatedcontrols ( P<0.001). Phosphomycin was the mostactive compound with a median effective dose(ED₅₀) of less than 0.62 g HP /l.Activities of the other phosphonates were weak butconsistent between experiments. The ED₅₀s on wholeplants were 2.1, 3.3, and 6.9 g HP /l for ethephon, phosphonate and fosetyl, respectively. TheED₅₀of P. syringae pv. syringaeincreased from 6.5 in non-treated controls to 7.7-8.8log₁₀ cfu/ml on plants treated with phosphonatesat 1.86 g HP /l. It was concluded thatdrench treatment with fosetyl is not a practicaloption for control of P. syringae pv. syringae on pear.     

Susceptibility of European pear cultivars to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae using immature fruit and detached leaf assays

The susceptibility of thirty-three pear cultivars and two pear rootstocks to four virulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae was evaluated by inoculating detached immature fruits and young leaves. The four strains were similarly virulent and did not show cultivar specificity although they were isolated from different pear cultivars and exhibited different biochemical profiles. The most frequently planted pear cultivars, Conference, Abate Fetel, General Leclerc, Williams, D. Comice, El Dorado, Alexandrine, B. Anjou, Passe Crassane and the rootstock OHxF 333 were susceptible to P. syringae pv. syringae. Maximal severity values were obtained on 'Preguystar' leaves (about 90%). The rootstock Winter Nelis was less susceptible. Results with immature fruit and detached leaf assays agreed with field observations on cultivar susceptibility to bacterial blast. However, the detached leaf test gave a more accurate prediction and has the advantages that symptoms develop quickly (48 h), and leaves are available for a longer period of time than fruits. This method is proposed as a rapid and reproducible screening system of cultivar susceptibility to bacterial blast of pear.