首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 328 毫秒
1.
The objective of this study was to determine if intramuscular administration of 60 units of oxytocin once daily for 29 days, regardless of when treatment was initiated during the estrous cycle (i.e., without monitoring estrous behavior and/or detecting ovulation), would induce prolonged corpus luteum (CL) function in cycling mares. Mares were randomly assigned to two groups: (1) saline-treated control (n = 7) and (2) oxytocin-treated (n = 9) subjects. Control mares received 3 cc of saline, and oxytocin-treated mares received 60 units (3 cc) of oxytocin intramuscularly for 29 consecutive days. Treatment was initiated in all mares on the same day (day 1), independent of the day of the cycle. Jugular blood samples for determination of progesterone concentration were collected three times weekly (M, W, and F) for 21 days before treatment was initiated to confirm that all mares had a luteal phase of normal duration immediately before treatment. Beginning on the first day of treatment, blood samples were collected daily for eight days and then three times weekly through day 80. Mares were considered to have prolonged CL function if serum progesterone remained >1.0 ng/mL continuously for at least 25 days after the end of the treatment period. The proportion of mares with prolonged CL function was higher in the oxytocin-treated group than in the saline-treated group (7/9 vs. 1/7, respectively; P < .05). Three of the seven oxytocin-treated mares that developed prolonged CL function initially underwent luteolysis within 4–7 days of the start of oxytocin treatment and then developed prolonged CL function after the subsequent ovulation during the treatment period. In the other four oxytocin-treated mares that developed prolonged CL function, progesterone remained >1.0 ng/mL throughout the treatment period and into the post-treatment period. All mares with prolonged CL function maintained elevated progesterone concentrations through at least day 55 of the study. In conclusion, intramuscular administration of 60 units of oxytocin for 29 consecutive days effectively prolonged CL function in mares, regardless of when treatment was initiated during the estrous cycle. Importantly, this represents a protocol for using oxytocin treatment to prolong CL function that does not require detection of estrous behavior or day of ovulation.  相似文献   

2.
The objectives of this study were to (1) compare the effect of twice versus once daily administration of oxytocin on days 7-14 after ovulation on the duration of corpus luteum (CL) function and (2) determine the effect of oxytocin treatment on endometrial oxytocin receptor concentration in mares. In experiment 1, mares were randomly assigned to three groups on day 7: (1) untreated control group (n = 7), (2) twice daily oxytocin treatment group (n = 7), and (3) once daily oxytocin treatment group (n = 8). Oxytocin-treated mares received 60 U of oxytocin intramuscularly (IM) the respective number of times each day on days 7 through 14. One of seven control mares (14%), five of seven (71%) twice daily oxytocin-treated mares, and five of eight (63%) once daily oxytocin-treated mares had prolonged CL function. There was no significant difference in the proportion of mares with prolonged CL function between the two oxytocin-treated groups, and collectively, oxytocin treatment increased (P < .05) the proportion of mares with prolonged CL function compared with no treatment. In experiment 2, mares were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 5/group): (1) saline-treated control mares, and (2) oxytocin-treated mares. Beginning on day 7, control mares received 3 mL of sterile saline IM twice daily, and oxytocin-treated mares received 60 U of oxytocin IM twice daily through day 14. On day 15, endometrial oxytocin-binding capacity was determined (as a measure of oxytocin receptor concentration), and there was no difference (P > .1) between control and oxytocin-treated mares (1,465.7 ± 108 and 1,382.8 ± 108 fmol/mg protein [mean ± standard error of mean], respectively).  相似文献   

3.
The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of a compounded long-acting progesterone formulation (BioRelease P4 LA 150; BETPHARM, Lexington, KY) containing 150 mg progesterone/ml for pregnancy maintenance in mares after prostaglandin (PG) F-induced luteolysis. On day 18 of gestation, mares were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 7/group): (1) saline-treated control (Saline); (2) PGF-treated control (PGF); (3) PGF- and Regu-Mate-treated (Regu-Mate); and (4) PGF- and BioRelease P4 LA 150-treated (BioRelease). On day 18, Saline mares received 1 ml sterile saline IM, whereas PGF, Regu-Mate, and BioRelease mares received 250 μg cloprostenol IM. Beginning on day 18, Regu-Mate mares received 10 ml Regu-Mate orally once daily and BioRelease mares received 10 ml BioRelease P4 LA 150 containing 150 mg/ml progesterone IM once every 7 days; treatments were continued until day 45 or until pregnancy loss occurred. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed every 3 days between days 18 and 45 (or until pregnancy loss). Pregnancy loss was defined as complete absence of a discernible embryonic vesicle as determined with transrectal ultrasonography. Pregnancy loss rates between days 18 and 45 were: Saline, 1/7; PGF, 7/7; Regu-Mate, 1/7; and BioRelease, 0/7. The pregnancy loss rate was higher (P < .01) in PGF-treated control mares compared with the other groups. There were no differences (P > .1) in pregnancy loss rates among the saline-treated control, Regu-Mate-treated, and BioRelease P4 LA 150-treated mares. These results indicate that intramuscular administration of BioRelease P4 LA 150 containing a total of 1.5 g progesterone every 7 days provided a sufficient level of progesterone to maintain pregnancy between days 18 and 45 of gestation in mares that lacked an endogenous source of progesterone; therefore, this long-acting formulation of progesterone appears to be an efficacious and suitable alternative to currently available progesterone formulations that require daily administration.  相似文献   

4.
Abstract

AIM: To compare the efficacy of oxytocin given once daily, either I/V or I/M, on Days 7–14 post-ovulation, on the expression of oestrus in mares through to 65 days post-ovulation.

METHODS: Eighteen mares of various breeds that were displaying normal oestrous cycles were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups on the day of ovulation (Day 0), detected using transrectal ultrasonography. Mares in the control group (n = 6) were given 1 mL saline I/V; mares in the I/V and I/M groups (n = 6 per group) were injected with 10 IU oxytocin I/V and I/M, respectively. All treatments were given once daily on Days 7–14. Mares were teased by a stallion three times per week, up to 65 days post-ovulation, to detect oestrous or dioestrous behaviour. Ovarian follicular and luteal activity were monitored using transrectal ultrasonography three times weekly, and daily when a follicle >30 mm diameter was present until ovulation. Blood samples were collected weekly for analysis of concentrations of progesterone in serum. Prolonged dioestrus was defined as a period of >30 days of dioestrous behaviour after Day 0, confirmed by detection of corpora lutea and concentrations of progesterone in serum >4 nmol/L.

RESULTS: Overall, 8/18 (44%) mares showed prolonged dioestrus. These included 2/6 (33%) mares in the control group, compared with 5/6 (83%) and 1/6 (16%) mares in the I/V and I/M groups, respectively (p = 0.11). The median duration of the first dioestrus was longer for the I/V group (64 (min 16, max 66) days) compared with the control group (18 (min 12, max 64) days) (p = 0.05), but was not different between the control group and the I/M group (16 (min 13, max 65) days) (p = 0.57). For all mares there was strong agreement between teasing behaviours, ultrasonographic assessment of ovarian activity, and concentration of progesterone in serum.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study found that low doses of oxytocin did not increase the proportion of mares with prolonged dioestrus, compared with controls, although I/V oxytocin did increase the median duration of dioestrus. The results must be interpreted with some caution as group numbers were small, and a variety of breeds were used. Further investigation of oxytocin given I/V may be warranted as a potential method of oestrus suppression in mares exhibiting oestrous cycles that is low cost, safe and well-tolerated, and potentially reversible with prostaglandin.  相似文献   

5.
Endogenous progesterone levels may decline after transcervical embryo transfer in some mares. Progestogen therapy is commonly used to support endogenous progesterone levels in embryo transfer recipient mares or those carrying their own pregnancy. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of the transcervical transfer procedure and/or altrenogest therapy on luteal function in mares. Mares were assigned to one of six treatment groups: group 1 (untreated control; n = 7 cycles), group 2 (sham transfer, no altrenogest; n = 8 cycles), group 3 (sham transfer plus altrenogest; n = 8 cycles), group 4 (pregnant, no altrenogest; n = 9 mares), group 5 (pregnant plus altrenogest; n = 9 mares), and group 6 (nonpregnant plus altrenogest; n = 10 cycles). Mares in groups 4-6 were bred and allowed an opportunity to carry their own pregnancy. Blood samples were collected for 22 days beginning on the day of ovulation. Sham embryo transfer (groups 2 and 3, combined) did not result in a decline in endogenous progesterone levels compared with control mares (group 6). However, sham embryo transfer did result in luteolysis and an abrupt decline in endogenous progesterone levels in one of the 16 (6.2%) sham-transferred mares. Altrenogest therapy in sham-transferred mares (group 3) was associated with lower endogenous progesterone levels on days 10, 12, and 13 postovulation when compared with sham-transferred mares that did not receive altrenogest (group 2). Administration of altrenogest to pregnant mares (group 5) was associated with lower concentrations of endogenous progesterone from days 14 to 18 and on day 21 compared with endogenous progesterone levels in pregnant mares not administered altrenogest (group 4). In conclusion, a transcervical embryo transfer procedure can cause luteolysis in a low percentage of mares. Altrenogest therapy may be associated with a reduction in endogenous progesterone secretion, presumably mediated by a reduction in pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) release and a decrease in luteotropic support.  相似文献   

6.
Twelve horse mares were used to investigate the effect of phenylbutazone or progesterone administration on uterine tubal motility, as reflected by embryo recovery from the uterus on day 5 after ovulation. Four treatment groups were used: group A (controls), in which uterine flush was performed 7 to 11 days after ovulation; group B (5-day controls), in which uterine flush was performed 5 days after ovulation; group C, in which uterine flush was performed 5 days after ovulation following administration of phenylbutazone (2 g, IV) on day 3; and group D, in which uterine flush was performed 5 days after ovulation following administration of progesterone in oil (250 mg, IM) on days 0, 1, and 2. Each mare was randomly assigned to each group once. Embryo recovery for each group was: group A, 13 embryos from 12 mares; group B, 3 embryos from 12 mares; group C, 4 embryos from 11 mares; and group D, 1 embryo from 11 mares. Recovery of embryos on day 5 in 3 of 12 nontreated mares indicated that equine embryos may enter the uterus before day 6. Neither treatment increased embryo recovery from the uterus on day 5 over that from the uterus of the 5-day controls.  相似文献   

7.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of exogenous progesterone administration at ovulation and during the early development of the CL, on its future sensitivity to a single administration of PGF2a in mares and cows. Horse Retrospective reproductive data from an equine clinic in the UK during three breeding seasons were used. Mares were divided into: control group, cycles with single ovulations; double ovulation group cycles with asynchronous double ovulations; and PRID group: cycles with single ovulations and treatment with intravaginal progesterone device (CIDR) immediately after the ovulation. All mares were treated with d‐cloprostenol (PGF) at either: (i) 88 hr; (ii) 96 hr; (iii) 104 hr; or (iv) 112 hr after the last ovulation. Cattle A total of nine non‐lactating Holstein cows were used. All cows were administered PGF14 d apart and allocated to one of two groups control group GnRH was administered 56 hr after the second PGF administration. CIDR group CIDR was inserted at the same time of GnRH administration. All cows were administered PGF at 120 hr post‐ovulation. The complete luteolysis rate of mares with double ovulation (66.7%) and those treated with exogenous progesterone (68.4%) was significantly higher than the rate of mares with single ovulation (35.6%) at 104 hr. In the cow, however, the treatment with CIDR did not increase the luteolytic response in cows treated at 120 hr post‐ovulation. In conclusion, the degree of complete luteolysis can be influenced by increasing the concentration of progesterone during the early luteal development in mares.  相似文献   

8.
9.
The changing concentrations and temporal relationships among a PGF2α metabolite (PGFM), progesterone (P4), LH, and estradiol-17β (E2) before, during, and after luteolysis were studied in 10 mares. Blood samples were collected every hour for ≥4 d beginning on day 12 after ovulation. The luteolytic period extended from a decrease in P4 at a common transitional hour (Hour 0) at the end of preluteolysis and beginning of luteolysis to a defined ending when P4 reached 1 ng/mL. The length of luteolysis was 22.9 ± 0.9 h, contrasting with 2 d in published P4 profiles from sampling every 6 to 24 h. In mares with complete data for Hours −40 to −2 (n = 6), PGFM concentrations remained below assay sensitivity (n = 2) or two or three small pulses (peak, 29 ± 4 pg/mL) occurred. During luteolysis, the pulses became more prominent (peak, 193 ± 36 pg/mL). Rhythmicity of PGFM pulses was not detected by a pulsatility program during preluteolysis but was detected in seven of nine mares during luteolysis and postluteolysis combined. The nadir-to-nadir interval for LH pulses and the peak-to-peak interval between adjacent pulses were longer (P < 0.05) during preluteolysis than during luteolysis (nadir to nadir, 5.2 ± 0.3 h vs 3.6 ± 0.4 h; peak to peak, 9.4 ± 1.0 h vs 4.7 ± 0.5 h). Unlike reported findings in cattle, concentrations of P4 decreased linearly within the hours of each PGFM pulse during luteolysis, and a positive effect of an LH pulse on P4 and E2 concentration was not detected. The reported balancing of P4 concentrations between a negative effect of PGF2α and a positive effect of LH in heifers was not detected in mares.  相似文献   

10.
Two experiments were conducted to determine if administration of progesterone within a low, subluteal range (0.1-1.0 ng/mL) blocks the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge (experiments 1 and 2) and ovulation (experiment 2) in lactating dairy cows. In experiment 1, progesterone was administered to cycling, lactating dairy cows during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle using a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device. CIDRs were pre-incubated in other cows for either 0 (CIDR-0), 14 (CIDR-14) or 28 days (CIDR-28). One group of cows received no CIDRs and served as controls. One day after CIDR insertion, luteolysis was induced by two injections of prostaglandin (PG) F(2alpha) (25 mg) at 12 h intervals. Two days after the first injection, estradiol cypionate (ECP; 3 mg) was injected to induce a LH surge. Concentrations of progesterone after luteolysis were 0.11, 0.45, 0.78 and 1.20 ng/mL for cows treated with no CIDR, CIDR-28, CIDR-14, and CIDR-0, respectively. LH surges were detected in 4/4 controls, 4/5 CIDR-28, 2/5 CIDR-14 and 0/5 CIDR-0 cows following ECP. In experiment 2, progesterone was administered to cycling, lactating, Holstein cows during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle as in experiment 1. Luteolysis was induced as in experiment 1. The occurrence of an endogenous LH surge and ovulation were monitored for 7 days. Concentrations of progesterone after luteolysis were 0.13, 0.30, 0.70 and 1.20 ng/mL for cows treated with no CIDR, CIDR-28, CIDR-14 and CIDR-0, respectively. LH surges and ovulation were detected in 5/5 controls, 3/7 CIDR-28, 0/5 CIDR-14 and 0/5 CIDR-0 cows. It was concluded that low concentrations of progesterone can reduce the ability of either endogenous or exogenous estradiol to induce a preovulatory surge of LH and ovulation.  相似文献   

11.
Daily changes in the plasma progesterone concentrations were determined in eight mares treated with intramuscular injections of 250 μg cloprostenol, a prostaglandin analogue, followed five days later by 2500 I.U. human chorionic gonadotropin. A second cloprostenol injection was given 14 days after the first; the mares were then inseminated on the third and fifth day of the subsequent estrus and a second injection of human chorionic gonadotropin was administered on the fifth day. The onset of estrus following the second cloprostenol treatment was synchronized beginning three to four days after treatment in all eight mares. All eight ovulated, five mares conceived and only four foaled. Evaluation of the progesterone profiles provided reliable indicators of luteolysis, ovulation and luteal function. Decreasing plasma progesterone concentrations were associated with cloprostenol induced luteolysis or preceded spontaneous onset of estrus. The plasma progesterone concentrations increased consistently after ovulation, and in the pregnant mares, the progesterone concentrations remained high during the first month after insemination.  相似文献   

12.
Thirty-one mares were used in an experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of three sustained-release injectable formulations of altrenogest and one formulation of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for long-term suppression of estrus and ovulation. Luteolysis was induced by injection of prostaglandin-F (Lutalyse) on day 0 (6th day after the previous ovulation) and was immediately followed by treatment with 1) no injection (controls; n = 7), 2) 1.5 mL of an altrenogest solution in sustained-release vehicle (LA 150, 1.5 mL; 225 mg altrenogest; n = 6), 3) 3 mL (450 mg altrenogest) of the same solution (n = 6), 4) 500 mg altrenogest in lactide-glycolide microparticles suspended in 7-mL vehicle (MP 500; n = 6), or 5) 1.0 g MPA as a 5-mL suspension. Mares were checked for estrus daily, and their ovaries scanned every other day until a 25-mm or greater follicle was detected, after which they were scanned daily. Control mares returned to estrus an average of 3.9 days after Lutalyse administration; all the single-injection altrenogest formulations increased (P < .05) the days to return to estrus, with the greatest increase occurring in mares receiving MP 500. Return to estrus was not affected by MPA treatment. Time of ovulation was determined by serial ultrasound scans and confirmed by daily plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone concentrations. Control mares ovulated an average of 8.8 days after Lutalyse administration. Treatment with 1.5 or 3 mL of LA 150 increased (P < .05) the mean days to ovulation to 16.5 and 21.2 days, respectively; MP 500 increased (P < .05) the days to ovulation to 33.5 days. Administration of MPA did not affect (P > .1) days to ovulation relative to control mares. The MP 500 treatment provided long-term suppression of estrus and ovulation and could prove useful for that purpose. Treatment with the LA 150 solutions provided shorter-term suppression, and a relatively tight grouping of the individual mares around the mean days to ovulation; these one-shot formulations could be useful for synchronizing ovulation in cyclic mares and inducing normal estrous cyclicity in vernal transitional mares exhibiting erratic, anovulatory estrous periods.  相似文献   

13.
To determine the minimal effective dose of prostagiandin (PGF2alpha; tromethamine salt) given subcutaneously (SC), mares of mixed breeding (400 kg av body weight) were given 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-mg doses from 7 to 9 days after ovulation. In some but not all mares given doses of 2 and 3 mg of PGF2alpha, luteolysis occurred, but doses of 5 or 10 mg of PGF2alpha were luteolytic in all mares. The 10-mg dose of PGF2alpha did not cause luteolysis in mares 1 day after ovulation, and caused luteolysis in only 2 of 5 mares on day 3 after ovulation. The same dose of PGF2alpha, however, caused luteolysis in all mares on days 5 or 7 after ovulation. The results indicate that the minimal effective luteolytic dose of PGF2alpha (free-acid equivalent) is about 9 mug/kg, and that PGF2alpha is effective fromday 5 after ovulation.  相似文献   

14.
A delayed rise in post-ovulatory progesterone is associated with poor embryo development in the cow, although the underlying cause of this aberrant luteal function is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to develop a novel model, in which a delayed progesterone rise could be induced by manipulating the dynamics of the follicular phase. Luteolysis was induced in 20 dairy cows in the presence of either a larger follicle > 10 mm (LF, n = 11) or a smaller follicle < 10 mm (SF, n = 9) and transrectal ultrasonography was performed to determine follicle and CL growth and timing of ovulation. Plasma progesterone and oestradiol were analysed 3x daily. Cows were slaughtered on either day 4 (n = 4 per group) or day 7 (SF, n = 5; LF, n = 7) after ovulation. The pre-ovulatory follicle was larger in the LF group than the SF group at luteolysis (13.5 +/- 0.4 mm versus 6.7 +/- 0.7 mm, P < 0.001) and ovulation (16.7 +/- 0.3 mm versus 13.6 +/- 0.6 mm, P < 0.001). The LF group experienced a shorter follicular phase and ovulated 36 h earlier than the SF group (P < 0.001). At luteolysis, plasma oestradiol concentrations were greater in the LF group (P < 0.001), although peak concentrations were not different (P > 0.05). Moreover, higher progesterone concentrations were observed in the LF group during the early luteal phase (P < 0.05). Luteal weights were positively correlated with plasma progesterone concentrations on day 5 (P < 0.05) but not day 8. In conclusion, a model has been developed which has shown that the dynamics of follicle development during the pre-ovulatory period is an important determinant of subsequent CL development and function.  相似文献   

15.
Based on different surveys, dairy farmers are concerned about extensive use of exogenous oxytocin in buffaloes, which is being held responsible for reproductive problems including irregular oestrous cycle and delayed ovulation. For these concerns, effects of oxytocin injection on postpartum follicular dynamics, postpartum oestrous interval (PEI), oestrous length, the interval from onset of estrus to ovulation and blood progesterone (P4) were studied in Nili-Ravi buffaloes. For this purpose, 23 animals within 1 week after calving were randomly divided into three groups: without oxytocin (CON; n = 7), 10 i.u. oxytocin (LOW; n = 8), 30 i.u. oxytocin – (HIGH; n = 8) and used to record the PEI for the study period of 154 days. At subsequent estrus, three buffaloes from each group (not served) were selected randomly to monitor two cycles for 6 weeks. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed to evaluate follicular and corpus luteum (CL) development, and blood sampling was done for progesterone (P4) analysis. These results revealed that postpartum oestrous interval (PEI) decreased significantly in oxytocin-treated groups. The number of small, medium and total follicles on the left ovary was significantly higher in the HIGH group. However, an overall number of small and total follicles on both right and left ovaries was significantly higher in CON and HIGH groups. On the other hand, there was no difference in the number of follicles on the right ovary among all treatment groups. The same was true for the size of pre-ovulatory follicles, CL, P4 concentrations and oestrous cycle length. The intervals from onset of estrus to ovulation and from standing estrus to ovulation were increased considerably in the HIGH group. It is concluded that exogenous oxytocin administration resulted in the shortening of PEI but triggered a delay in ovulation. Moreover, a higher dose of oxytocin could stimulate the growth of small, medium, and total follicles in postpartum Nili-Ravi buffaloes.  相似文献   

16.
The GnRH antagonist antarelix (Teverelix™) was administered to mares (0.01 mg/kg, i.v., twice a day) during the periovulatory period. In Experiment 1, 20 mares were divided into a treated (A3d−) and a control (Control−) group. A3d− mares received antarelix for 3 days from the day when the dominant follicle (F1) reached 32 mm (D0). In Experiment 2, 10 mares were divided into a treated (A6d+) and a control (Control+) group. A6d+ mares received antarelix for 6 days from D0 and hCG was injected in all animals (1600 IU, i.v.) on D1. Pregnancies were determined 13 days after ovulation. In both experiments, antarelix interrupted or totally abolished the LH surge. In Experiment 1, 5/10 of the A3d− mares (with maximum LH concentrations of 11.6 ng/ml at the beginning of treatment) ovulated at the same time as the Control− mares; the other five mares (with LH concentrations under 5.4 ng/ml) ovulated 13.4±0.6 days later. In Experiment 2, all the A6d+ mares ovulated at the same time as the Control+ mares. In treated mares which ovulated during the treatment, progesterone concentrations and fertility did not differ from control mares. These results demonstrate that in mares: (1) a small elevation of endogenous LH can induce ovulation, (2) ovulation can be postponed approximately 13 days after a 3-day antarelix treatment if initiated just before the preovulatory LH surge, (3) ovulation can be induced by hCG on depressed levels of endogenous LH, (4) the inhibition of the post ovulatory LH surge has no effect either on the corpus luteum or on fertility.  相似文献   

17.
Reasons for performing study: Persistent mating induced endometritis is among the most common causes of infertility in the mare. Recently, improved pregnancy rates have been reported when corticosteroids were administered to ‘problem mares’ specifically, to modulate the post mating inflammatory response; however, the effect of treatment on pituitary and ovarian function requires further study. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of prolonged treatment with glucocorticoids on pituitary and ovarian function. Methods: Eighteen cycling Quarter Horse mares in early oestrus were assigned randomly to one of 3 treatment groups: dexamethasone 0.05 mg/kg bwt i.v. twice a day, prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg per os twice a day, or placebo for 5 days. Mares were examined by ultrasound daily to evaluate reproductive function. Blood samples were collected daily to measure luteinising hormone (LH), progesterone and cortisol levels. Results: Dexamethasone treatment caused greater (P<0.05) suppression of endogenous cortisol concentration (9.4 ± 1.1 ng/ml) compared to prednisolone‐ (41.9 ± 4.0 ng/ml) or placebo‐treated mares (32.4 ± 3.8 ng/ml). After 24 h, mares treated with dexamethasone exhibited lower uterine oedema scores than prednisolone‐ or placebo‐treated mares. An ovulation rate of 40% was observed in dexamethasone‐treated mares (2/5) compared to 83% for prednisolone (5/6) and 100% for placebo‐treated (6/6) mares. An absence of a LH surge was noted in 3 of 5 dexamethasone‐treated mares and one of 6 prednisolone‐treated mares. Conclusions: Repeated administration of dexamethasone to mares in oestrus is associated with decreased uterine oedema, suppression of LH and a high rate of ovulation failure. It is recommended that dexamethasone treatment is limited to only 1 or 2 days and that a lower dose is considered in the management of persistent mating induced endometritis to avoid potential adverse affects on reproductive function.  相似文献   

18.
A 25- or 35-mm diameter glass ball was placed in the uterus of mares to observe the effect on interovulatory interval, luteal function, estrous behavior, the endometrium, and subsequent fertility. The 25-mm glass ball was spontaneously expelled from the uterus of 6 of 12 mares (50%), whereas none of the 35-mm glass balls was expelled. Teasing results were consistent with the concentration of circulating progesterone. Luteal function was extended in 7 of 18 mares (39%) maintaining a glass ball, whereas an extended luteal period occurred in 4 of 32 mares (13%) observed as controls. Extended luteal function occurred in 7 of 62 diestrus periods (11%) among mares following ball placement, whereas 4 of 50 diestrus periods (8%) were extended in control cycles. The mean luteal life span in mares with a glass ball and extended luteal function was 87 days (range, 76 to 109 days); there were no significant differences in length of luteal function in both groups of mares that received the 2 different ball sizes. Endometrial changes observed between preplacement and postremoval samples were minimal. When mares were bred in the season subsequent to glass ball removal, 17 of 23 (74%) conceived. Placing an intrauterine glass ball in a mare may be an alternative to exogenous hormone therapy to prevent cycling in some mares. Luteal function was extended to nearly 90 days in approximately 40% of mares. The 35-mm diameter glass ball appeared to have an advantage for retention over the 25-mm size. Results of our study could not completely rule out idiopathic persistence of the corpus luteum as an explanation for the extended luteal function observed in mares with a glass ball. Readers are cautioned that many questions still exist about the use of intra-uterine glass balls in mares. Further work is required to confirm the efficacy of the use of an intra-uterine glass ball for prolonged luteal function in mares and to identify its mechanism of action.

Introduction

In recent years, there has been a debate among veterinary practitioners concerning the efficacy of various extra-label uses of progestin products (eg, cattle growth implants and human depo-progestin injectables) to modify behavior in mares. Clients who own horses are more frequently seeking means to suppress behavioral signs of estrus, expecting that with such suppression the mare will train or perform better. Requests for these progestin products by mare owners puts veterinary practitioners in the precarious situation of using pharmaceuticals, extra-label, without scientific evidence of efficacy, in mares.In reality, the only truly effective means of suppressing behavioral signs of estrus in most intact mares is to maintain sufficient concentrations of circulating progesterone or its equivalent. Today the only efficacious way to maintain a sufficient level of progesterone or its equivalent is for the mare to have a functional corpus luteum (CL), administer exogenous progesterone (eg, ≥50 mg in oil, intramuscularly, daily), or administer daily synthetic progestins (eg, altrenogest [Regumate], Hoechst Roussel Vet, Warren, NJ).1, 2 and 3Recently, placement of a glass ball of 30-mm diameter in the uterus has been suggested as a reversible means of preventing mares from cycling and displaying behavioral signs of estrus (message to Equine Clinicians Network, Dr Randy J. T. de Greef, March 19, 2000). If this technique is effective, it would be of value to mare owners because it would eliminate the need for daily treatments over extended periods.We have been unable to find literature that would support or refute this idea in horses. However, the effects on ovarian function, body weight gain, and pregnancy rate in nulliparous heifers of a copper-bearing intrauterine device were studied.4 The researchers reported that the heifers receiving the intrauterine device had lower progesterone concentrations than did control subjects. Nevertheless, nearly all of the treated heifers had better weight gain, were anestrus, and did not become pregnant during the study; however, multiple ovarian follicular cysts developed in many of them. The idea of using an intrauterine device to suppress estrus is said to have originated centuries ago in the Middle East as a common means of keeping camels from cycling and becoming pregnant (personal communication, Dr Ahmed Tibary, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, Wash, May 2000).To our knowledge, the efficacy and long-term effects of glass ball treatment have not been critically evaluated. Our objectives in this study were to observe the effect of placement of an intra-uterine glass ball on interovulatory interval, luteal function, estrous behavior, the endometrium, and subsequent fertility of mares.

Materials and methods

Animals

A total of 38 light-horse breed mares ranging in age from 3 to 20 years were used for this study. Mares were maintained in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching (1st revised edition, January 1999). All experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Auburn University (IACUC Protocol No. 0308-R-2307).

Intra-uterine device

Two glass ball (www.glassmarbles.com) sizes, 25- and 35-mm diameters, were evaluated in this study (Fig 1).
Full-size image (49K)
Fig. 1. Glass ball diameters evaluated during the study were 25 mm (left) and 35 mm (right).
In preparation for placement, the glass balls were sterilized by autoclaving. Initial attempts at autoclaving resulted in several broken balls. However, use of a liquid cycle with a temperature of 250°F (121°C) and pressure of 16 psi, with no prevacuum or dry cycle and a slow cool-down phase, did not result in further breakage.Upon entering the study, mares were monitored daily via transrectal palpation and ultrasonography for their progression through the estrous cycle. A glass ball was placed in the body of the uterus at the first examination following ovulation. The perineum was cleaned with cotton, tap water, and antiseptic dish detergent. A sterilized sleeve was donned and a small amount of sterile lubricant was applied to the back of the hand. Grasping the glass ball, it was manually carried into the vagina. The ball was placed in the cervical lumen and moved forward with the index finger to the caudal uterine body. After removing the hand from the vagina, the ball was located on transrectal palpation and pushed forward to the horn-body junction if it had not already moved to that position. Once the ball was positioned in the uterus, the vulva was again cleaned as previously described. The uterus was infused with 1 g of ticarcillin disodium (Ticar, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, Pa) in a 35-mL volume and each mare received 250 μg cloprostenol (Estrumate, Bayer Corporation, Shawnee Mission, Kan) intramuscularly to prevent a persistent endometritis if contaminants were introduced with the glass ball.At the end of the glass ball phase of the experiment for a mare, the ball was removed from the uterus during the following estrus when the cervix was softest. Occasionally a mare would require sedation to allow better manipulation of the ball per rectum. Mares with pendulous horns presented the most difficulty. Removal was accomplished by manipulating the glass ball, per rectum, caudally toward the cervix, through the cervix, and then to the vulva for retrieval. If the cervix was not fully dilated, a gloved hand was taken per vagina to the caudal cervical os and the glass ball was retrieved from the lumen.

Experimental protocol

This study was conducted at Auburn University in southeastern Alabama between May and October 2000. All mares used in this study had ovulated at least once in the season before being assigned to a treatment group. Twelve mares were randomly assigned to each treatment group (25-mm and 35-mm glass balls), representing 24 of 38 study mares. Control data were collected from 32 of 38 study mares during cycles in which no glass ball was in the uterus. Eighteen of the 32 mares used to collect control data were also treated with a glass ball during the study, whereas 14 mares were not treated. Control data were not available from 6 of 24 mares treated with a glass ball for management reasons beyond our control.An endometrial biopsy was taken from each mare during estrus in the cycle before being assigned to a treatment group, for comparison with a sample following removal of the glass ball. The follow-up samples were taken immediately after removal of the glass ball to ensure detection of inflammation, if present. An attempt was made to take the preplacement and postremoval samples from the same area near the uterine horn-body junction. Endometrial biopsies were evaluated as previously described.5 The evaluator was blinded to the group assignment and preplacement results of each mare.Throughout the study, mares treated with a glass ball were individually teased with a breeding stallion at a rail. Behavior was scored by response of a mare to the stallion using a categorical scale (0 = rejection, 1 = indifference, 2 = receptive) adapted from behavioral signs previously described.6Beginning on the day of glass ball placement, mares were examined daily by ultrasonography and palpation per rectum to monitor changes in the reproductive tract and ball location. The ultrasonic appearance of a glass ball in the uterus is shown in Fig 2.
Full-size image (38K)
Fig. 2. The ultrasonic appearance of a 35-mm glass ball is seen at the left uterine horn-body junction.
Mares were also teased to a stallion, and blood was taken for determination of progesterone concentrations. Daily evaluation was continued until 2 ovulations had been detected; after this, daily blood sampling and teasing was continued until 2 more ovulations were detected. However, if at any time mares were found to maintain luteal tissue (continued ultrasonic evidence of a CL, palpable tone in the uterus and cervix, absence of estrus signs on ultrasonography, and absence of estrus behavior) for 35 days, daily evaluation was discontinued and the mares were moved to pasture and blood samples were taken weekly to monitor progesterone concentrations.In mares that did not experience prolonged luteal function (>35 days), the glass ball was removed from the uterus after 4 ovulations had been detected. In mares that experienced prolonged luteal function, the glass ball was removed after progesterone concentrations had fallen to <1 ng/mL followed by a subsequent rise to >4 ng/mL, indicating a subsequent ovulation. Mares that spontaneously expelled the glass ball were removed from the study upon discovery without further sampling.Immediately following removal of a glass ball, an endometrial biopsy was taken for comparison with the preplacement sample. Following removal of the glass balls, mares were bred during the next season under the protocol of another study. Standard breeding management for artificial insemination and several stallions were used. The results reported are for the season and reflect pregnancy outcome at 15 days after ovulation.Estrous cycles (n = 50) were observed in 32 of 38 study mares to establish an interovulatory interval and incidence of spontaneous persistence of the CL as a control for the effect of the treatment protocol. Observations were made during separate control cycles when a glass ball was not in the uterus of any mares that were also used in a treatment group during the study. At least one cycle was evaluated for each of the 32 mares, with some contributing a second cycle. The reproductive tract and circulating progesterone concentrations were evaluated in the same fashion and on the same daily schedule as the treatment groups. During the control cycles, the mares were simultaneously being observed to establish estrous cycle control data for another study. Therefore, when spontaneous persistence of a CL occurred and a luteal phase lasted 30 days, the mare was given prostaglandin to lyse the CL.

Progesterone assay

Circulating progesterone concentrations were used to reflect luteal function. Concentrations higher than 1 ng/mL were considered indicative of functional luteal tissue. Plasma was harvested from blood collected from each mare. Plasma samples were frozen and held at −50°C until assayed in batches of approximately 200. Circulating concentrations of progesterone were quantified using a commercial radioimmunoassay kit (COAT-A-COUNT progesterone radioimmunoassay kit, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, Calif).

Statistical analysis

Two measures were derived from each interovulatory period: the interovulatory interval in days and the number of days during which progesterone was >1 ng/mL. The effects of glass ball size, monitoring method, mare and their interactions were tested using the GLM procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Ages of mare among groups were compared with use of an unpaired t test (GraphPad InStat version 3.00 for Windows 95, GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif). The proportion of mares experiencing extended luteal function or spontaneous persistence of a CL during the treatment and control cycles was determined. In addition, the proportion of diestrus periods that resulted in extended luteal function or spontaneous persistence of a CL was determined. The proportion of mares and diestrus periods in which extended luteal function occurred during treatment and control cycles were compared using a Fisher Exact Test (GraphPad InStat version 3.00 for Windows 95, GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif).

Results

A very small amount of uterine fluid (<1 cm depth) was observed via ultrasonography in 3 mares for 2 days following placement of the glass ball. By day 3, however, the fluid was no longer visible in any of the mares, one of which did go on to maintain luteal function for an extended period. None of the mares that developed uterine fluid experienced spontaneous loss of the glass ball.A total of 24 mares had a glass ball of either 25 mm (n = 12) or 35 mm (n = 12) diameter placed in the uterus. The 25-mm glass ball was spontaneously expelled in 6 of 12 mares (50%). Five were expelled within 24 hours of placement and a sixth during a subsequent estrus period, 11 days following placement. None of the 35-mm glass balls was spontaneously expelled.The glass ball was observed to randomly alternate between the left and right uterine horn-body junctions. Movement was observed in every mare except two. In those 2 mares, the 35-mm glass ball was consistently observed at the same site during each examination. One of the mares experienced extended luteal function and the other did not.Overall, 7 of 18 mares (39%) that maintained the glass ball experienced extended (>35 day) luteal function. Extended luteal function was detected during the first diestrus after ball placement in 4 mares, during the second diestrus in one mare, and during the third diestrus in 2 mares. Mean (±SEM) progesterone concentrations during the extended luteal periods are reported in Figs 3, 4, and 5.
Full-size image (13K)
Fig. 3. Mean (± SEM) progesterone (P4) concentration in 4 mares experiencing extended luteal function during the first diestrus period following placement of a 35-mm (n = 3 mares) or 25-mm (n = 1 mare) diameter glass ball in the uterus.
Full-size image (12K)
Fig. 4. Mean progesterone (P4) concentration in the one mare that experienced extended luteal function during the second diestrus period following placement of a 25-mm diameter glass ball in the uterus.
Full-size image (16K)
Fig. 5. Mean (± SEM) progesterone (P4) concentration in mares experiencing extended luteal function during the third diestrus period following placement of a 35-mm (n = 2 mares) diameter glass ball in the uterus.
There was no difference between the 25- and 35-mm balls in terms of proportion of mares having extended luteal function (2 of 6, 33%, and 5 of 12, 42%; P > .05). Extended luteal function occurred in 7 of 62 diestrus periods (11%) among mares following ball placement. Again, there was no difference between 25- and 35-mm balls in terms of proportion of diestrus periods resulting in extended luteal function (2 of 20, 10%, and 5 of 42, 12%, P > .05).An extended luteal period occurred in 4 of 32 mares (13%) observed for control data. Progesterone concentrations remained above 1 ng/mL for 30 days after ovulation in 4 of 50 control diestrus periods (8.0%) observed. Of the 4 mares that experienced extended luteal function during the control cycle, a glass ball was placed in the uterus of 3 of the mares during the treatment cycles. However, none of the 3 mares experienced extended luteal function while the glass ball was in the uterus. The proportion of mares that experienced extended luteal function (7 of 18, 39%) while a glass ball was in the uterus was greater than the proportion of mares that experienced an extended luteal period (4 of 32, 13%) during the control cycle (P = .04). The proportion of diestrus periods in which extended luteal function occurred was the same whether a glass ball was present in the uterus (7 of 62, 11%) or not (4 of 50, 8%; P = .75).The interovulatory interval was 23.0 (±0.43) days for the control cycles (n = 46) in which an extended luteal period did not occur. This was longer than the interovulatory interval (20.2 ± 0.41 days) for the cycles (n = 55) that occurred subsequent to glass ball placement without apparent extension of luteal function (P < .001). A functional CL was maintained (15.5 ± 0.35 days, range 11 to 23 days) longer in control cycles than in cycles with glass balls (13.2 ± 0.42 days, range 7 to 18 days) in which extended luteal function was not apparent (P < .001). Mean (± SEM) progesterone concentrations for the control cycles (n = 46) and treatment cycles in which an extended luteal period did not occur are presented in Fig 6.
Full-size image (12K)
Fig. 6. Mean (± SEM) progesterone (P4) concentration in mares during control cycles (-♦- n = 46) without a glass ball and treatment cycles (-□- n = 55) with a glass ball in which an extended luteal period did not occur.
The mean age of all mares in the study was 9.6 years (range, 3 to 20 years). Mares that experienced extended luteal function were younger, at 8.3 years (±0.87), than mares that did not experience extended luteal function, at 12.6 years (±1.05, P = .012). Mares that spontaneously expelled the glass ball were younger, at 6.3 years (±2.0), than mares that did not expel the glass ball, at 10.9 years (±0.87, P = .024).The interassay and intra-assay coefficient of variation for the progesterone assay was 7% and 3%, respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.02 ng/mL. Estrous behavior observed during the study accurately reflected circulating progesterone concentrations. All mares with a glass ball invariably displayed behavioral estrus scores of 1 or 2 when progesterone concentrations were <1 ng/mL, while scores of 0 were observed when concentrations were >1 ng/mL. Those that experienced extended luteal function also displayed scores of 0 throughout the period while progesterone concentrations were >1 ng/mL and estrus behavior was monitored. A single CL was observed at the primary ovulation site throughout the observation period. No additional CLs were observed in any mare with a glass ball following the primary ovulation.No change in endometrial category was observed between the preplacement and postremoval endometrial samples in any of the mares in the 25-mm glass ball group. In the 35-mm group, the score declined by a category in one mare, improved by a category in 2 mares, and was unchanged in the other 9 mares. The difference in category assigned in those 3 mares was attributed to mild changes, up or down, in the amount of lymphocytic inflammation observed. The mare that declined by one category did not experience extended luteal function, whereas 1 of 2 mares with improvement in endometrial category experienced an extended luteal period.During the season following glass ball removal, 23 of 24 mares were bred, including all of the mares that had experienced extended luteal function. During the season, 17 of 23 (74%) of the mares bred subsequently conceived, including 5 of 7 (71%) of those that had experienced extended luteal function.

Discussion

Placement of the glass ball through the cervix was relatively easy in most of the mares. Occasionally the cervix of a mare would require some degree of manual dilation to push a 35-mm diameter ball through its lumen; however, the 25-mm balls generally passed with ease. During preliminary work, we had found that the glass ball was more likely to be expelled from the uterus if it was placed a day or two before ovulation. Based on the anecdotal information from the Netherlands (message to Equine Clinicians Network, Dr Randy J. T. de Greef, March 19, 2000) and our preliminary experience, we decided to place the glass ball in the uterus at the examination following ovulation. Our assumption when placing the glass ball following ovulation was that the cervix would have started to close under the influence of rising progesterone, which might help prevent it from being expelled. We found that younger mares were more likely to expel the glass ball, perhaps because younger mares have more effective uterine clearance (in estrus and the periovulatory period) and a less dependent uterine position than do older mares. The smaller diameter and lighter weight of the 25-mm glass ball also may have contributed to the spontaneous expulsion from 6 mares, although it is also possible the cloprostenol contributed to the loss in some mares. However, losses observed during preliminary work were not associated with cloprostenol administration, and neither was the loss in this study from the mare that expelled the ball during the subsequent estrus at 11 days following placement.Idiopathic persistence of the primary CL, also known as spontaneous persistence of the CL,7 cannot be completely ruled out as an explanation for the extended luteal function observed in this study. The incidence of idiopathic persistence is reported to vary widely.8 and 9 Ginther and Pierson8 did not observe idiopathic persistence in any of 69 interovulatory intervals, while Stabenfeldt and Hughes9 suggest it can occur in as many as 25% of estrous cycles. However, acceptance of inadequate evidence for the condition may have led to an overestimation of the incidence in some reports.7The proportions of diestrus periods that resulted in an extended luteal period were not different between the control (4 of 50) and glass ball (7 of 62) cycles. However, the proportion of cycles in mares with glass balls inserted is heavily biased by the 4 cycles from each mare that did not experience extended luteal function. A greater proportion of mares (7 of 18) experienced extended luteal function when a glass ball was in the uterus than without a ball (4 of 32) during the control cycles. Four of the mares that experienced extended luteal function with a glass ball in the uterus did so during the first diestrus following placement and did not experience subsequent ovulations. These mares are consequently underrepresented in the proportion of diestrus periods among the mares that had a glass ball inserted, especially if all or some of the mares had experienced additional periods of extended luteal function following subsequent ovulations. This would seem to make the proportion of mares a more valuable indicator of glass ball efficacy. However, in all fairness, we should point out that 2 of 7 mares that experienced extended luteal function did so after the third ovulation following glass ball placement (Fig 5). The control data were collected from 32 mares in 50 estrous cycles; only 18 of the mares were observed in more than one cycle. This may have biased our results for fewer occurrences of idiopathic persistence of the CL, although we believe it is unlikely.Five of the 7 mares in this study that experienced extended luteal function when a glass ball was in the uterus had never previously been observed to have prolonged interovulatory intervals over multiple seasons. Historic data were not available for the other 2 mares. The average length of the luteal period reported to be associated with idiopathic persistence of the CL is approximately 2 months.7 The average length of luteal function observed in this study was 3 months. These several points would seem to support the idea that the extended luteal function observed in this study was indeed affected by the glass ball protocol rather than idiopathic persistence. Therefore, although it is not possible to positively distinguish idiopathic persistence of the primary CL from extended luteal function influenced by the glass ball protocol, we believe that our observations in this study suggest a genuine effect. An explanation is not readily apparent for our observation that mares experiencing extended luteal function were younger than those that did not experience extended luteal function.Two possible explanations for an effect of the glass ball have been discussed (Equine Clinicians Network archives). First, the glass ball simulates a conceptus and through movement and physical contact prevents prostaglandin release from the endometrium, in turn maintaining the CL (an endogenous progesterone source) indefinitely. A second theory suggested that the glass ball would stimulate mild inflammation, in turn causing release of small amounts of prostaglandin that would be inadequate to achieve luteolysis. As long as the glass ball was present, the endometrium would remain in a prostaglandin-depleted state and the CL would be maintained.In the event that the first theory discussed was correct, two glass ball sizes were evaluated in this study to account for a range in vesicle diameter that would be expected to occur naturally during the early stages of pregnancy. However, this theory seems to assume that the physical presence of a spherical structure, in this case a glass ball, in the uterine lumen will prevent prostaglandin release. This is contrary to conventional logic that would assume, as has been demonstrated in other species, that a chemical messenger is produced by the equine conceptus to allow maternal recognition of pregnancy and avoid prostaglandin release.10The second theory is as equally confusing, considering that there are countless reasons why a mare may have low-grade endometrial inflammation, yet clinically we do not recognize scores of mares that maintain their luteal tissue indefinitely. Both theories suggest that the glass ball is mobile enough to contact the majority of the endometrium or cause low-grade endometrial inflammation throughout the uterus. Our findings did not support the idea that the glass ball was particularly mobile in the uterus. Although the ball did move between the uterine horn-body junctions in most mares, the distance moved was only a few centimeters. In 2 mares, the glass ball did not move at all. One of the mares experienced extended luteal function in spite of the lack of ball movement. It probably also would be more logical to assume that an irritant to the endometrium would cause low-grade inflammation, which in turn would likely trigger sufficient release of endogenous prostaglandin F to cause luteolysis.11 and 12 Uterine biopsy results did not reflect an increase in endometrial inflammation. Further, the interovulatory interval and functional life of the CL was >2 days longer during control cycles than in cycles when a glass ball was in the uterus. This would suggest that the ball was more likely to cause early regression of the CL.Placing the glass ball following ovulation could predispose a mare to endometritis, considering the procedure involved passing a foreign object, although sterilized, through the cervical lumen after a mare has entered diestrus. A mare susceptible to endometritis may not have time to clear her uterus of contaminants before closing the cervical lumen completely. Based on this rationale and experience during our preliminary work, we decided to provide treatments simultaneous to glass ball placement that were intended to help prevent a persistent postplacement endometritis. Hence, each mare in this study was infused with ticarcillin disodium (Ticar) and treated with cloprostenol (Estrumate) following glass ball placement. Uterine fluid was only observed in a few mares in the first few days following glass ball placement, and it resolved quickly. Nevertheless, it is advisable to re-examine a mare with ultrasonography following placement of a glass ball to ensure a detectable endometritis has not developed.Discussions on the Equine Clinicians Network suggested that the glass ball had no long-term detrimental effects on the uterus. The relatively minor ultrasonic changes detected in the uterus following glass ball placement, the endometrial biopsy results, and a conception in 74% of the mares following glass ball removal would seem to support this claim.It is interesting that the mares experiencing extended luteal function were able to maintain progesterone concentrations above 1 ng/mL for an average of nearly 3 months. This is the period in which we would expect the fetoplacental unit to begin assuming maintenance of pregnancy through the production of pregnanes in an ever-increasing number of pregnant mares. The progesterone profiles in these mares were very similar to those reported for mares hysterectomized 3 days following ovulation.13 The primary CL was present 70 days following ovulation in hysterectomized mares, but disappeared by 140 days.13 We found this was also true of mares that experienced extended luteal function with a glass ball in the uterus.The efficacy of an intrauterine glass ball for maintaining luteal function and thus preventing cycling and behavioral estrus in mares appears to be moderate. Our results were not quite as good as those reported from the Netherlands (Dr Randy J. T. de Greef, message to Equine Clinicians Network, March 19, 2000). The Dutch veterinarian indicated that the technique works in at least 75% of cases; in contrast, we found the technique to be effective in only approximately 40% of mares. Perhaps a placebo effect for mare owners, as is suspected with the use of progestin implants, would explain the additional success reported from the Netherlands.The glass ball protocol takes advantage of endogenous progesterone production to suppress behavioral estrus. Some variation in estrus behavior will be observed in any group of mares teased to a stallion throughout the cycle. However, mares are typically expected to reject a stallion when a functional CL is present and to change from indifferent to receptive as estrogens rise in the absence of a functional CL. Teasing results in this study were consistent with the behavior expected for the concentration of circulating progesterone detected. We did not monitor the mares that experienced extended luteal function beyond their subsequent ovulation, although we speculate that if the glass ball had been left in the uterus, some of the mares may have experienced another extended luteal period. Another researcher related information to us about 2 mares in which he had placed a glass ball (personal communication, Dr Peter Daels, National Institute of Agricultural Research, Nousilly, France, April 2000). The mares experienced extended luteal function, then, following administration of prostaglandin, both mares returned to estrus, retained the glass ball, ovulated, and again experienced extended luteal function.This technique offers the advantage of suppressing behavioral estrus because of endogenous progesterone production over an extended period following a single administration of a glass ball. The disadvantage is that it does not work in every mare nor does it appear to have an immediate effect in every mare following intra-uterine placement of the glass ball. However, when it is effective it may serve as an alternative method for suppressing estrous cycle and/or behavior and thus avoiding the need for administration of exogenous progestin products. Readers are cautioned that many questions still exist about the use of intra-uterine glass balls in mares. Further work is required to confirm the efficacy of the use of an intra-uterine glass ball for prolonged luteal function in mares and to identify its mechanism of action.  相似文献   

19.
A preliminary trial was performed to evaluate the ability of sustained release preparations of estradiol-17β or progesterone plus estradiol-17β to synchronize estrus in cyclic mares. Group 1 mares were treated with a 50 mg intramuscular (IM) injection of sustained release estradiol-17β, while group 2 mares were treated with estradiol plus 1.5 g of sustained release progesterone. All mares received an IM injection of 10 mg of prostaglandin-F2α (PGF2α) 10 days after steroid treatment. Mares were examined by transrectal ultrasonography on Days 1 and 10 of treatment and then at ≤2 day intervals to monitor follicle size. Once a follicle ≥30 mm diameter and uterine edema were detected, 0.5 mg of the GnRH analog histrelin was administered IM. Mares were examined daily thereafter to detect ovulation. Group 1 mares did not exhibit ovulation synchrony (ovulations occurred 12-22 days after steroid treatment), whereas ovulation synchrony was satisfactory in group 2 mares (interval to ovulation being 20.4 ± 1.5 days, range 17-22 days). Using sustained release preparations of progesterone plus estradiol-17β, with PGF2α administered on Day 10, could eliminate the need for daily injections of steroid preparations in oil when synchronizing estrus and ovulation.  相似文献   

20.
We have investigated the effects of systemic administration of the oxytocin antagonist (OTA) L-368,899 on luteolytic PGF(2alpha) release in ewes. In the first study, carried out in four ovariectomized ewes primed with progesterone to induce responsiveness to oxytocin, 3-h i.v. infusions of 3, 10 and 30 microg/kg/min OTA, carried out on days 12, 14, 16 and 18 in a Latin Square design, resulted in a significant attenuation of the oxytocin induced increase in PGFM concentration at all doses (OTA 139+/-8.3% of pre-oxytocin baseline; control 206.8+/-18.7%; P<0.005). In a further study, continuous infusion of cyclic ewes (n=6) with 10 microg/kg/min OTA from day 13 to day 17 of the cycle resulted in a reduction in both the frequency (OTA 1.0+/-0.4/ewe; control 2.2+/-0.2/ewe; P<0.05) and amplitude (OTA 31.8+/-11.0 pg/ml; control 68.8+/-10.4 pg/ml; P<0.05) of endogenous PGFM episodes compared to control ewes (n=5) measured during daily 8-h sampling windows on days 14-17. This reduction in PGFM concentrations was accompanied by a modest extension in the day of luteolysis (progesterone <0.5 ng/ml) to day 17.5+/-0.4 in the OTA treated group compared with day 16.4+/-0.5 in the control group (P=0.07). The results demonstrate that treatment with OTA caused a significant reduction in episodes of increased PGFM concentration during the period of luteolysis and may provide an approach by which to reduce early pregnancy failure.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号