Influence of insulin and energy intake on ovulation rate, luteinizing hormone and progesterone in beef heifers

Ovarian and gonadotropin responses to insulin and energy restriction were investigated in a 2 X 2 factorial experiment using 2-yr-old Brangus heifers. Thirty heifers were paired by weight and body condition, then assigned to treatment groups receiving 75 (LE) or 180% (HE) of NRC recommendations for dietary energy for maintenance. Diets were adjusted weekly to maintain daily .25 to .5 kg weight loss or 0 to .25 kg weight gain, respectively. On d 10 of the first estrous cycle subsequent to the initial 45 d of feeding, heifers within each dietary group were allocated to receive twice daily infusions of either 40 U insulin (I) or saline (C). Infusions began at 5 and 10 h postprandial and were given in six boluses, 20 min apart. Infusions continued daily until d 20 or estrus, whichever occurred first. On d 11, blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals for 12 h to determine luteinizing hormone (LH) and insulin concentrations. On d 16 to 20, twice daily im injections of 1 mg follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were administered. Heifers were ovariectomized on d 11 after estrus. Number of corpora lutea (CL) in LE-I heifers was greater (P less than .05) in LE-C, HE-C or HE-I. Total CL weight (g) per heifer was greater (P less than .05) in HE-C and LE-I heifers than in LE-C. Individual CL wt was heavier in HE than in LE heifers (P less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced ovulation and luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers: effect of day of the cycle

The COSynch protocol has been used to synchronize ovulation and facilitate fixed-time AI in beef cattle. Establishment and maintenance of pregnancy was negatively affected, in previous studies, by GnRH-induced ovulation of small dominant follicles (/=10 mm) and increased ovulatory response after GnRH 2.     

Comparison of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in estrous-cycling and prepubertal beef heifers

The objective of the experiment was to compare follicular dynamics, ovulatory response to GnRH, and synchrony of estrus and ovulation among estrous-cycling and prepubertal beef heifers synchronized with a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR)- based or GnRH-PGF(2alpha) (PG) protocol. Estrous-cycling beef heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments (C1, C2, C3, C4), and prepubertal beef heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments (P1, P2) by age and BW. Blood samples were taken 10 and 1 d before treatment to confirm estrous cyclicity status (progesterone > or =0.5 ng/mL estrous cycling). The CIDR Select (C1, n = 12; P1, n = 14)-treated heifers received a CIDR insert (1.38 g of progesterone) from d 0 to 14, GnRH (100 microg, i.m.) on d 23, and PG (25 mg, i.m.) on d 30. Select Synch + CIDR (C2, n = 12; P2, n = 11)-treated heifers received a CIDR insert and GnRH on d 23 and PG at CIDR removal on d 30. The CIDR-PG (C3, n = 12)-treated heifers received a CIDR insert on d 23 and PG at CIDR removal on d 30. Select Synch (C4, n = 12)-treated heifers received GnRH on d 23 and PG on d 30. HeatWatch transmitters were fitted at CIDR removal (C1, C2, C3, P1, and P2) or at GnRH administration (C4) for estrus detection. Ultrasound was used to determine the response to GnRH and the timing of ovulation after estrus. Among the estrous-cycling heifers, ovulatory response to GnRH and estrous response did not differ (P > 0.05). Among the prepubertal heifers, more (P = 0.02) P1 heifers responded to GnRH than P2 heifers, but estrous response did not differ (P > 0.05). Among the estrous-cycling heifers, variance for interval to estrus after PG was reduced (P < 0.05) for C1 compared with each of the other treatments, and C3 [corrected] was reduced (P < 0.05) compared with C2 [corrected] Variance for interval to ovulation after PG was reduced (P < 0.05) for C1 compared with each of the other treatments. Among the prepubertal heifers, there was no difference (P > 0.05) in variance for interval to estrus or ovulation. Results from C1 and P1 (T1) and C2 and P2 (T2) were combined to compare T1 and T2 among mixed groups of estrous-cycling and prepubertal heifers. Response to GnRH was greater (P < 0.01; 81% T1 and 39% T2), and variances for interval to estrus and ovulation for T1 were reduced (P < 0.01) compared with T2. In summary, CIDR Select improved (P < 0.01) the synchrony of estrus and ovulation compared with Select Synch + CIDR.     

Melengestrol acetate alters muscle cell proliferation in heifers and steers

In vitro experiments were performed to investigate the effects of melengestrol acetate (MGA) or progesterone (P4) on bovine muscle satellite cells and C2C12 myoblasts. Addition of MGA at physiological and supraphysiological concentrations resulted in a dose-dependent decrease (P < 0.05) in DNA synthesis as measured by [3H]-thymidine incorporation (TI). Similarly, P4 addition (0.01 nM) reduced (P < 0.05) TI. Addition of MGA (10 nM) increased (P < 0.05) IGF-I mRNA abundance but did not affect myogenin mRNA. Progesterone addition (10 nM) increased myogenin mRNA abundance (P < 0.05). In C2C12 cultures, P4 addition resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in TI. The antiprogestin RU486, in combination with MGA or P4, also resulted in reduced (P < 0.05) TI. Treatment with RU486 alone had a negative effect (P < 0.05) on TI that was similar to the progestins. Treatment of C2C12 myoblasts with MGA (100 nM) resulted in an increase (P < 0.05) in myogenin mRNA. These studies suggest that progestins may reduce satellite cell proliferation, ultimately affecting carcass composition.     

Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge and ovarian hormone secretion in gilts

The influence of varying doses of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on the preovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, estradiol-17 beta (E2) and progesterone (P4) was studied in synchronized gilts. Altrenogest (AT) was fed (15 mg X head-1 X d-1) to 24 cyclic gilts for 14 d. Pregnant mares serum gonadotropin (PMSG; 750 IU) was given im on the last day of AT feeding. The gilts were then assigned to one of four groups (n = 6): saline (I), 500 IU hCG (II), 1,000 IU hCG (III) and 1,500 IU hCG (IV). Human chorionic gonadotropin or saline was injected im 72 h after PMSG. No differences in ovulation rate or time from last feeding of AT to occurrence of estrus were observed. All gilts in Groups I and II expressed a preovulatory LH surge compared with only four of six and three of six in Groups III and IV, respectively. All groups treated with hCG showed a rapid drop (P less than .01) in plasma levels of E2 11, 17, 23 h after hCG injection when compared with the control group (35 h). The hCG-treated gilts exhibited elevated P4 concentrations 12 h earlier than the control group (3.1 +/- .5, 3.4 +/- .72, 3.1 +/- .10 ng/ml in groups II, III and IV at 60 h post-hCG vs .9 +/- .08 ng/ml in group I; P less than .05). These studies demonstrate that injections of ovulatory doses of hCG (500 to 1,500 IU) had three distinct effects on events concomitant with occurrence of estrus in gilts: decreased secretion of E2 immediately after hCG administration, failure to observe a preovulatory LH surge in some treated animals and earlier production of P4 by newly developed corpora lutea.     

Effects of short- or long-term infusions of acetate or propionate on luteinizing hormone, insulin, and metabolite concentrations in beef heifers

Two trials were conducted to evaluate the effects of short- (Trial 1) or long-term (Trial 2) intraruminal isocaloric infusions of acetate or propionate on secretion of LH, insulin, and selected metabolites in short- or long-term energy-restricted beef heifers. In Trial 1, 16 Angus heifers were assigned on d 6 to 12 of a synchronized estrous cycle (estrus = d 0) to a body weight-maintenance (BWM; n = 4) or an energy-restricted, body weight-loss (BWL; n = 12) treatment. On d 12 of a synchronized estrous cycle, heifers received PGF2alpha to synchronize estrus, and 12 h later BWL heifers received intraruminal, isocaloric infusions of acetate, propionate, or vehicle for 6 h and BWM heifers received vehicle concurrently. Mean plasma LH and LH pulse frequencies and amplitudes were not affected by treatment (P > .05). In contrast, infusion of propionate increased plasma insulin (P < .05) and reduced plasma concentration of NEFA (P < .05). In Trial 2, six ovariectomized Angus heifers were energy-restricted for 30 d. On d 14 and 26 of restriction, heifers began receiving intraruminal isocaloric infusions of acetate or propionate for 96 h in a switchback approach. Intraruminal infusions of vehicle for 6 h preceded infusions of acetate or propionate. Jugular blood was collected at 12-min intervals during infusions of vehicle and during the last 6 h of infusion of acetate or propionate. Mean concentration of LH and amplitude of pulses of LH were lower during acetate vs propionate or vehicle infusion (P < .05). Infusion of propionate increased insulin relative to acetate or vehicle infusion (P < .05). Plasma NEFA were reduced by infusion of propionate (P < .05) and increased by infusion of acetate (P < .05).     

Synchronization of estrus with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F2 alpha in beef and dairy heifers

Beef (n = 783) and dairy (n = 209) heifers at 14 locations were used to evaluate the efficacy of feeding melengestrol acetate (MGA; .5 mg/d) for 7 d followed by an i.m. injection of 25 mg prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF) on the last day of MGA feeding (MGA + PGF) to synchronize estrus. Untreated heifers (C) and heifers injected once i.m. with PGF served as contemporary controls. Heifers were observed for estrual behavior for a minimum of 38 d starting on the 2nd d of MGA feeding. Heifers in estrus from d 1 through d 60 after PGF injection were artificially inseminated (AI) or bred to bulls (d 30 to 60 post PGF only). During the 7-d MGA feeding period fewer (P less than .01) MGA + PGF (1.5%) than C (20.6%) or PGF (18.1%) heifers were observed in estrus. Percent of heifers in estrus d 1 to 6 post PGF was different among groups (P less than .05; 30.5, 52.8, 72.3 for C, PGF and MGA + PGF, respectively). More (P less than .01) MGA-fed (92%) than non-MGA-fed (C and PGF combined) heifers (85.4%) were observed in estrus during d 1 to 24. Conception rate (CR) during d 1 to d 6 was not different (P = .19) between C (58.9%) and MGA + PGF (51.2%) heifers; CR was lower (P = .01) for MGA + PGF than for PGF (68.3%) heifers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Suppression of preovulatory luteinizing hormone surges in heifers after intrauterine infusions of Escherichia coli endotoxin

A study was conducted to test the hypothesis that high cortisol concentrations associated with products of infections (endotoxin) cause derangement in the neuroendocrine mechanism controlling ovulation in heifers. Eight Holstein heifers were given 2 injections of prostaglandin (PG), 11 days apart, to synchronize estrus. Starting from 25 hours after the second injection of PG (PG-2), the uterus of each heifer was infused with 5 ml of pyrogen-free water (control, n = 3) or Escherichia coli endotoxin (5 micrograms/kg of body weight) in 5 ml of pyrogen-free water (treated, n = 5), once every 6 hours for 10 treatments. Blood samples were obtained every 15 minutes via indwelling jugular catheter for an hour before and 2 hours after each infusion, then hourly until an hour before the next infusion. Ultrasonography of the ovaries was performed every 12 hours, starting 24 hours after PG-2 injection until 96 hours after PG-2 injection. Serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone and cortisol were determined by validated radioimmunoassays. Changes in cortisol concentrations were not detected in control heifers with preovulatory luteinizing hormone surges at 60 to 66 hours after PG-2 injection, followed by ovulations 72 to 96 hours after PG-2 was injected. None of the treated heifers ovulated, and the resulting follicular cysts (14 to 18 mm diameter) persisted for 7 to 21 days. In all treated heifers, serum cortisol concentrations increased (4- to 10-fold) during the first 2 hours after each infusion and then decreased gradually until the next infusion. Luteinizing hormone concentrations remained at baseline values throughout the treatment period in all treated heifers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Progesterone concentration,estradiol pretreatment,and dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone affect gonadotropin-releasing hormone-mediated luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers

We examined whether progesterone (P₄)-induced suppression of LH release in cattle can be overcome by an increased dose of exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or pretreatment with estradiol (E₂). In Experiment 1, postpubertal Angus-cross heifers (N = 32) had their 2 largest ovarian follicles ablated 5 d after ovulation. Concurrently, these heifers were all given a once-used, intravaginal P₄-releasing insert (CIDR), and they were randomly assigned to be given either prostaglandin F_2α (Low-P₄) or no treatment (High-P₄) at follicle ablation, and 12 h later. Six days after emergence of a new follicular wave, half of the heifers in each group (n = 8) were given either 100 or 200 μg of GnRH i.m. Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were higher in the Low- vs High-P₄ groups, and in heifers given 200 vs 100 μg of GnRH (mean ± SEM 15.4 ± 2.2 vs 9.1 ± 1.2, and 14.8 ± 2.1 vs 9.8 ± 1.4 ng/mL, respectively; P ≤ 0.01). Ovulation rate was higher (P = 0.002) in the Low-P₄ group (15/16) than in the High-P₄ group (6/16), but it was not affected by GnRH dose (P = 0.4). In Experiment 2, heifers (n = 22) were treated similarly, except that 5.5 d after wave emergence, half of the heifers in each group were further allocated to be given either 0.25 mg estradiol benzoate i.m. or no treatment, and 8 h later, all heifers were given 100 μg GnRH i.m. Both groups treated with E₂ (Low- and High-P₄) and the Low-P₄ group without E₂ had higher peak plasma LH concentrations compared to the group with high P₄ without E₂ (12.6 ± 1.8, 10.4 ± 1.8, 8.7 ± 1.3, and 3.9 ± 1.2 ng/mL, respectively; (P < 0.04)). However, E₂ pretreatment did not increase ovulation rates in response to GnRH (P = 0.6). In summary, the hypotheses that higher doses of GnRH will be more efficacious in inducing LH release and that exogenous E₂ will increase LH release following treatment with GnRH were supported, but neither significantly increased ovulation rate.     

Influence of premature induction of a luteinizing hormone surge with gonadotropin-releasing hormone on ovulation, luteal function, and fertility in cattle

We tested the hypothesis that luteal function and fertility would be reduced in cattle induced to ovulate prematurely compared with those ovulating spontaneously. Estrus was synchronized in 56 beef cows (24 that were nonlactating and 32 that were nursing calves). At 6.4 +/- 0.1 d after estrus, all follicles > or = 5 mm were aspirated (day of aspiration = d 0) with a 17-gauge needle using the ultrasound-guided transvaginal approach. On d 1.5 and 2, cows were administered 2 luteolytic doses of PGF2alpha. Ovarian structures were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography from d -2 to 12, or ovulation. Emergence of a new follicular wave occurred on d 1.7 +/- 0.1. When the largest follicle of the newly emerged wave was 10 mm in diameter (d 4.8 +/- 0.1), cows were assigned on an alternating basis to receive 100 microg of GnRH (GnRH-10; n = 29) to induce ovulation or, upon detection of spontaneous estrus, to the spontaneous (SPON) treatment (n = 24). Cows were bred by AI at 12 h after GnRH (GnRH-10) or 12 h after the onset of estrus (SPON) as detected using an electronic surveillance system. Blood samples were collected every other day beginning 2 d after ovulation until pregnancy diagnosis 30 d after AI. Ovulation and AI occurred in 29/29 cows in the GnRH-10 and in 24/24 cows in the SPON treatment. Ovulation occurred later (P < 0.05) in the SPON (d 7.7 +/- 0.1) than GnRH-10 (d 6.8 +/- 0.1) treatment. Double ovulations were detected in 47% of cows, resulting in 1.5 +/- 0.1 ovulations per cow. Diameters of the ovulatory and the second ovulatory (in cows with 2 ovulations) follicles were greater (P < 0.05) in the SPON (12.0 +/- 0.3 mm and 10.5 +/- 0.4 mm, respectively) than in the GnRH-10 (10.7 +/- 0.1 mm and 9.2 +/- 0.3 mm) treatment. Cross-sectional areas of luteal tissue and plasma concentrations of progesterone during the midluteal phase were greater (P < 0.05) in the SPON (3.62 +/- 0.2 cm2 and 6.4 +/- 0.3 ng/mL) than in the GnRH-10 (3.0 +/- 0.2 cm2 and 5.4 +/- 0.2 ng/mL) treatment. The conception rate to AI in the SPON (100%) treatment was greater (P < 0.05) than in the GnRH-10 (76%) treatment. The animal model used in this study resulted in unusually high conception rates and double ovulations. In conclusion, premature induction of the LH surge reduced the diameter of ovulatory follicle(s), the luteal function, and the conception rate to AI.     

Pulsatile or continuous infusion of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and hormonal concentrations in prepubertal beef heifers

An experiment was conducted to determine if exogenous luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) administered iv intermittently as pulses (P) or by continuous sc infusion (I) using osmotic minipumps could sustain pulsatile LH release and induce estrous cyclicity in prepubertal heifers. Prepubertal heifers were assigned randomly to: 1) receive pulses of LHRH (n = 6; 2.5 micrograms LHRH/2 h for 72 h), 2) be infused with LHRH (n = 11; 1.25 micrograms LHRH/h for 72 h), or 3) serve as controls (n = 16). Blood was collected at 20-min intervals for 8 h (0900 to 1700 h) from six heifers in each group on d 1, 2, 3 (during treatment), and on d 4 (during 8 h after terminating LHRH treatments). Heifers given LHRH had higher (P less than .01) LH concentrations than controls. Preovulatory-like LH surges occurred in three I, two P and no control heifers during treatment. Pulse frequencies of LH (no. LH pulses/8 h) were greater (P less than .001) for P heifers than for I and control heifers due to pulsatile LHRH treatment. Serum estradiol was higher (P less than .01) during treatment for LHRH-treated heifers than for controls. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone, cortisol, and progesterone were unchanged during treatment. High levels of cortisol on d 1 declined (P less than .001) to baseline by d 2. Characteristic progesterone rises or short luteal phases occurred within 10 d of treatment initiation in more (P less than .05) LHRH-treated heifers (I = 45%, P = 33%) than controls (6%), although days to first observed estrus and first ovulation were unaffected by treatments. Although both continuous and pulsatile administration of LHRH successfully induced LH and estradiol release as well as preovulatory-like LH surges in some heifers, earlier initiation of estrous cycles was not achieved. Estrous cycles appeared to be delayed by exposure to continuous LHRH infusions during the peripubertal period.     

Synchronization of estrus in postpartum beef cows and virgin heifers using combinations of melengestrol acetate, GnRH, and PGF2alpha

The efficacy of various combinations of melengestrol acetate (MGA), GnRH, and PGF2alpha for the synchronization of estrus in Angus-based beef cattle was compared. Hormones were administered as follows: MGA, 0.5 mg x animal(-1) x d(-1) mixed in a grain carrier; GnRH, 100 microg i.m.; PGF2alpha, 25 mg i.m. In Exp. 1, 2, and 3, cows were randomly assigned to treatments by parity and interval postpartum. The detection of estrus and AI were conducted from d -2 until 72 to 96 h after PGF2alpha, at which time cows not detected to be in estrus received GnRH and fixed-time AI (TAI). Data were analyzed separately for primiparous and multiparous cows. In Exp. 1, cows (n = 799) at three locations received GnRH on d -7 and PGF2alpha on d 0 and either no further treatment (GnRH-PGF) or short-term MGA from d -6 through d -1 (STMGA). Among multiparous cows, conception rate at TAI was greater (P < 0.05) for STMGA (41%, 47/115) than for GnRH-PGF treated cows (26%, 24/92). Across herds and parity, synchronized AI pregnancy rate (SPR) was not affected (P > 0.10) by treatment (GnRH-PGF vs. STMGA; 54%, 210/389 vs. 57%, 228/402). In Exp. 2, cows (n = 484) at three locations received either STMGA or long-term MGA from d -32 through d -19, GnRH on d -7, and PGF2alpha on d 0 (LTMGA). Among primiparous cows, SPR was greater (P < 0.01) in LTMGA (65%, 55/85) than STMGA-treated cows (46%, 40/87). Treatment had no effect (P > 0.10) on SPR among multiparous cows (STMGA vs. LTMGA; 59%, 92/155 vs. 64%, 101/157). In Exp. 3, cows (n = 838) at four locations received the LTMGA treatment and either no further treatment or an additional period of MGA exposure from d -6 through d -1 (L&STMGA). Among primiparous cows, SPR tended to be influenced (P < 0.10) by the herd x treatment interaction and was greater (P < 0.01) among L&STMGA (86%, 19/22) than LTMGA-treated cows (56%, 14/25) at a single location. Among multiparous cows, SPR was lower (P < 0.05) in L&STMGA (46%, 165/358) than LTMGA-treated cows (55%, 184/336). In Exp. 4, Angus heifers (n = 155) received either STMGA or 14 d of MGA (d -32 through d -19) and PGF2alpha on d 0 (MGA-PGF). The detection of estrus and AI were conducted from d -2 to d 6. Interval to estrus was greater (P < 0.05) and estrous response was lower (P < 0.05) in STMGA than MGA-PGF-treated heifers. In conclusion, primiparous cows responded more favorably to longer-duration MGA treatments than did multiparous cows. All protocols achieved sufficient SPR to justify their use for improved reproductive management of postpartum beef cows.     

Hypothalamic deafferentation in prepuberal beef heifers: Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and estradiol benzoate on luteinizing hormone secretion

Hypothalamic control of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion was investigated in crossbred beef heifer calves by comparing anterior (AHD), posterior (PHD), and complete (CHD) hypothalamic deafferentation with sham operated controls (SOC). Heifers (n = 16) were fitted with an indwelling jugular catheter for 6 days before cranial surgery, and assigned randomly to treatments. Blood for radioimmunoassay of LH was collected sequentially at 15-min intervals during an 8-h period on days ? 1 before and day 6 after hypothalamic deafferentation or sham operation. On the day of surgery, blood samples were collected sequentially at 15-min intervals 2 h before induction of anesthesia and throughout surgery and early recovery. Seven months after hypothalamic deafferentation, all experimental and sham operated heifers were ovariectomized and treated with vegetable oil (i.m.) plus saline (i.v.), vegetable oil plus gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), estradiol benzoate (EB, 1 mg) in vegetable oil. After ovariectomy basal plasma concentrations of LH increased (P < 0.01) compared with the low circulating hormone levels before ovariectomy. The amplitude of LH response to GnRH was greater (P < 0.01) in CHD and PHD when compared with SOC and AHD heifers. Injection of EB failed to induce a LH surge in CHD and PHD 900–1100 min later when compared with the robust response seen in SOC and AHD heifers. Injection of EB plus GnRH elicited LH release in all deafferentated and sham operated heifers. These results indicate a transient change in LH secretion after AHD or CHD in prepuberal heifers with intact ovaries. After OVX, the integrity of the neural connection of the posterior hypothalamus is required for EB-induced LH release in beef heifers.     

Synchronization of estrus and artificial insemination in replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin-releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2alpha, and progesterone

We evaluated whether a fixed-time AI (TAI) protocol could yield pregnancy rates similar to a protocol requiring detection of estrus, or detection of estrus and AI plus a clean-up TAI for heifers not detected in estrus, and whether adding an injection of GnRH at controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insertion would enhance fertility in CIDR-based protocols. Estrus in 2,075 replacement beef heifers at 12 locations was synchronized, and AI was preceded by 1 of 4 treatments arranged as a 2 x 2 factorial design: 1) Estrus detection + TAI (ETAI) (n = 516): CIDR for 7 d plus 25 mg of prostaglandin F2alpha (PG) at CIDR insert removal, followed by detection of estrus for 72 h and AI for 84 h after PG (heifers not detected in estrus by 84 h received 100 microg of GnRH and TAI); 2) G+ETAI (n = 503): ETAI plus 100 microg GnRH at CIDR insertion; 3) Fixed-time AI (FTAI) (n = 525): CIDR for 7 d plus 25 mg of PG at CIDR removal, followed in 60 h by a second injection of GnRH and TAI; 4) G+FTAI (n = 531): FTAI plus 100 microg of GnRH at CIDR insertion. Blood samples were collected (d -17 and -7, relative to PG) to determine ovarian status. For heifers in ETAI and G+ETAI treatments, a minimum of twice daily observations for estrus began on d 0 and continued for at least 72 h. Inseminations were performed according to the a.m.-p.m. rule. Pregnancy was diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography. The percentage of heifers exhibiting ovarian cyclic activity at the initiation of treatments was 89%. Pregnancy rates among locations across treatments ranged from 38 to 74%. Pregnancy rates were 54.7, 57.5, 49.3, and 53.1% for ETAI, G+ETAI, FTAI, and G+FTAI treatments, respectively. Although pregnancy rates were similar among treatments, a tendency (P = 0.065) occurred for pregnancy rates in the G+ETAI treatment to be greater than in the FTAI treatment. We concluded that the G+FTAI protocol yielded pregnancy rates similar to protocols that combine estrus detection and TAI. Further, the G+FTAI protocol produced the most consistent pregnancy rates among locations and eliminated the necessity for detection of estrus when inseminating replacement beef heifers.     

Effects of 17 beta-estradiol and diets varying in energy on secretion of luteinizing hormone in beef heifers

An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that 17 beta-estradiol (E2) would not suppress secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) in heifers fed a diet limited in energy during the period before the onset of nutritionally induced anestrus. Sixteen of 20 heifers that had been exhibiting normal estrous cycles (20 mo of age, 409 +/- 6 kg body weight) were ovariectomized, and half of them were assigned at random to receive an E2 implant. The ovariectomized heifers were assigned at random to receive diets that contained low (L; 5.8 Mcal X animal-1 X d-1, n = 8) or high levels of energy (H; 20.0 Mcal X animal-1 X d-1, n = 8) for 100 d. The other four heifers remained intact and were fed the L-diet. The intact heifers were utilized to determine the status of reproductive function in animals fed the L-diet. Heifers lost body weight rapidly after initiation of feeding the L-diet. Heifers fed the L-diet then stabilized at a lighter weight until the latter part of the experiment. One of the four intact heifers fed the L-diet became anestrus near the end of the study. Mean concentrations of LH in blood serum increased linearly (P less than .05) in ovariectomized heifers fed the L- and H-diet. Mean concentration of LH in heifers fed the H-diet that were implanted with E2 was similar to ovariectomized heifers fed the H-diet that received no E2. Mean LH in serum of ovariectomized heifers implanted with E2 fed the L-diet was suppressed and remained low throughout the study. Frequency of pulses of LH in ovariectomized heifers fed the L-diet was less (P less than .01) than that in ovariectomized heifers fed the H-diet. Estradiol decreased the number of pulses of LH in heifers fed the L-diet. We conclude that dietary energy restriction in beef heifers has a direct action on the hypothalamo-pituitary axis to lower the number of pulses of LH in the absence of ovarian steroids. However, ovarian E2 appears to suppress further secretion of LH in heifers fed limited levels of dietary energy before the onset of nutritional anestrus occurs, therefore, our working hypothesis is rejected.     

Active immunization of heifers against luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin and bovine luteinizing hormone

Seventy crossbred heifers were allotted randomly to 10 treatment groups. Treatments consisted of active immunization against ovalbumin (OV) conjugates of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and bovine luteinizing hormone (bLH) with each of three adjuvants. The adjuvants were complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), M103(6) and 6VR6. Control animals were immunized against OV alone using CFA. Bulls were placed with the heifers following immunization to allow comparison of pregnancy rates between groups. Blood samples were collected weekly for 14 wk to determine antibody concentrations. Significant levels of circulating LH or LHRH antibodies were detected in heifers immunized with each of the hormone conjugates. Complete Freund's adjuvant was the most effective for stimulating antibody response to these antigens; however, M103 was equally effective when used with bLH or hCG conjugates. None of the heifers in the bLH-OV-CFA, bLH-OV-M103 or LHRH-OV-CFA immunization groups was pregnant at slaughter, whereas 71% of the OV-CFA control heifers were pregnant. Fertility suppression may be achieved in the bovine by active immunization against any of these three hormone conjugates. However, the duration of this study (8 wk after immunization) does not allow evaluation of the duration of effectiveness of each of the treatments.     

Active immunization of beef heifers against luteinizing hormone: III. Evaluation of dose and longevity

Objectives were to evaluate the dose (Exp. 1) and purity of LH preparations (Exp. 2) on the anti-LH antibody response in heifers. Experiment 3 evaluated the longevity of LH immunization on sterility in heifers. In Exp. 1, 115 crossbred heifers were injected every 3 wk for 6 wk with .1, .33, 1.0, 3.0 or 9.0 mg of LH-ovalbumin. Concentrations of anti-LH antibodies generated were quantified by determining the percentage of binding of [125I]LH in serum. Mena LH binding over wk 0 to 12 was greater in heifers immunized with 1.0 mg conjugate than in heifers immunized with other doses (P less than .05). In Exp. 2, LH-ovalbumin conjugates were made from either LH-1, LH-2 or LH-3, which had relative immunological potencies of 2.1, 1.5 and 1.2 x NIH-LH-S1 units/mg, respectively. Forty-eight crossbred beef heifers were immunized against one of these three LH-ovalbumin conjugates, against LH conjugated without ovalbumin (LH-LH), or against ovalbumin alone (Oval). Estrous cycle activity was monitored by measuring serum progesterone concentration. Potency of the LH preparation used in the LH-ovalbumin conjugate was correlated (r = .94) with its ability to produce LH antibodies. In Exp.3, heifers were injected with 1 mg antigen every 2 wk for 10 wk. Five LH-1 heifers and five control heifers were slaughtered for examination of ovaries 10 wk after the last booster injection. The remaining five LH-I and five control animals were placed with a bull 8 wk after the last booster. All five control heifers conceived by 4 +/- 1 wk after placement with the bull whereas the LH-immunized heifers remained acyclic for 42 to 96 wk.