首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
全基因组选择是一种利用覆盖全基因组的高密度标记进行选择育种的新方法,可通过早期选择缩短世代间隔,提高育种值估计准确性等加快遗传进展,尤其对低遗传力、难测定的复杂性状具有较好的预测效果,真正实现了基因组技术指导育种实践。随着芯片和测序技术日趋成熟,高密度标记芯片检测成本不断降低,全基因组选择模型的不断升级和优化,预测准确性不断提高,全基因组选择已成为动物遗传改良的重要手段和研究热点。目前,全基因组选择已经成为奶牛遗传评估的标准方法,并取得重要进展,在其它物种中的应用正在逐步开展。本文主要对全基因组选择的统计模型发展进行综述,总结全基因组选择在动物遗传育种中的应用现状,讨论当前存在的问题,并对全基因组选择模型的发展方向和应用前景进行展望。  相似文献   

2.
家畜基因印记研究进展   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  
综述了家畜基因印记的生理功能、可能机制及家畜中发现的印记基因,并论述了基因印记的生物学意义和对家畜育种的影响。  相似文献   

3.
    
The aim of this study was to compare correlation matrices between direct genomic predictions for 31 traits at the genomic and chromosomal levels in US Holstein bulls. Multivariate factor analysis carried out at the genome level identified seven factors associated with conformation, longevity, yield, feet and legs, fat and protein content traits. Some differences were found at the chromosome level; variations in covariance structure on BTA 6, 14, 18 and 20 were interpreted as evidence of segregating QTL for different groups of traits. For example, milk yield and composition tended to join in a single factor on BTA 14, which is known to harbour the DGAT1 locus that affects these traits. Another example was on BTA 18, where a factor strongly correlated with sire calving ease and conformation traits was identified. It is known that in US Holstein, there is a segregating QTL on BTA18 influencing these traits. Moreover, a possible candidate gene for daughter pregnancy rate was suggested for BTA28. The methodology proposed in this study could be used to identify individual chromosomes, which have covariance structures that differ from the overall (whole genome) covariance structure. Such differences can be difficult to detect when a large number of traits are evaluated, and covariances may be affected by QTL that do not have large allele substitution effects.  相似文献   

4.
    
The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of the supervised independent component regression (SICR) method for the estimation of genomic values and the SNP marker effects for boar taint and carcass traits in pigs. The methods were evaluated via the agreement between the predicted genetic values and the corrected phenotypes observed by cross‐validation. These values were also compared with other methods generally used for the same purposes, such as RR‐BLUP, SPCR, SPLS, ICR, PCR and PLS. The SICR method was found to have the most accurate prediction values.  相似文献   

5.
目前,基因组选择（genomic selection,GS）技术已经在种猪育种中开展,但为获得较高的收益,还需研究一些应用策略,如确定仔猪基因分型个体比例和早期仔猪留种比例。本试验选择温氏集团出生于2011—2016年的大白种猪作为研究对象,共有超过4.5万条的生长测定记录,超过7万条繁殖记录,和2 090个个体的简化基因组测序（GBS）数据,其中,出生于2016年7~12月的440个体作为候选群体。研究性状包括两个生长性状（校正100 kg日龄和校正100 kg背膘厚）和一个繁殖性状（总产仔数）。为对比预测效果,在候选群体进行育种值预测时,按照是否利用其基因型或表型信息分为4种预测方案,比较不同方案的预测可靠性和个体选择指数的排名情况。结果显示,在预测候选群育种值时,利用其表型或基因型信息均比不利用时的预测结果更加可靠。对生长性状终测前、后进行基因组选择指数计算,发现,终测后指数排名前30%的个体都位于终测前指数排名前60%内。若仔猪出生后仅选择常规BLUP预测指数排名前60%的个体,会导致有接近15%的具有优秀潜力的个体被遗漏。本研究建议,对所有新生健康仔猪都进行基因分型并计算基因组选择指数,然后对指数排名靠前60%的个体进行性能测定。  相似文献   

6.
    
At present, genomic selection (GS) has been applied in pigs breeding, but some implementation strategies, such as the determination of genotyping ratios or early selection rates for piglets, are required to obtain a higher benefit using this technology. The Large White pigs born from 2011 to 2016 at WENS Foodstuff Group Co.,Ltd were chose as the research objects, including more than 45 000 growth measurement records, more than 70 000 reproduction records and 2 090 individuals with genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data. The 440 individuals born from July to December in 2016 were used as the candidate individuals. The traits included two growth traits, age at 100 kg and backfat thickness at 100 kg, and one reproduction trait, number of total born. To compare the prediction effects, four prediction scenarios were designed according to including or ignoring the phenotypic or genotypic information of candidate individuals when predicting their breeding values. The predictive reliability of different scenarios and rankings of selection indices of individuals would be compared. The results showed that the results using the phenotypic and genotypic information was more reliable than ignoring them to predict the breeding values of candidate individuals. When genomic selection indices were calculated before and after performances testing for the growth traits, the individuals ranking in the top 30% of indices after testing were all found in the individuals ranking in the top 60% of indices before testing. If the piglets with the top 60% of traditional BLUP indices were only selected, around 15% of individuals with good genetic potentials would be omitted. This study suggests that all healthy piglets after birth are genotyped and their genomic selection indices are calculated, and then the individuals ranking in the top 60% of indices are chose to perform growth measurement.  相似文献   

7.
         下载免费PDF全文
Selection and breeding are very important in production of livestock and poultry,and breeding value estimation is the core of selection and breeding.Genomic selection (GS) is a novel molecular breeding method to estimate genomic breeding value using high-density markers across the whole genome.At present,GS has been successfully applied in cattle,pig,chicken and so on,and made significant progress.This method can achieve early selection,decrease the testing costs,shorten generation interval,improve the accuracy of breeding value estimation and accelerate genomic progress.GS estimates the effect of SNP by phenotype information and SNP genotype of each individual in the reference population,and measures the SNP genotype to calculate the genomic estimated breeding value in the candidate population,then selects the best individuals according to the genomic estimated breeding value.With the rapid development of genotyping technology and the decrease of detection cost,and the continuous optimization and high efficiency of genomic selection methods,genomic selection has become an important research method in the selection and breeding of livestock and poultry.The authors reviewed some of the widely used genomic selection methods,compared the differences between different methods,analyzed the problems and challenges of genomic selection,and looked forward to its application prospects in breeding.  相似文献   

8.
鲍晶晶  张莉 《中国畜牧兽医》2020,47(10):3297-3304
畜禽的选种选育在生产中至关重要,育种值估计是选种选育的核心。基因组选择（genomic selection,GS）是利用全基因组范围内的高密度标记估计个体基因组育种值的一种新型分子育种方法,目前已在牛、猪、鸡等畜禽育种中得到应用并取得了良好的效果。该方法可实现畜禽育种早期选择,降低测定费用,缩短世代间隔,提高育种值估计准确性,加快遗传进展。基因组选择主要是通过参考群体中每个个体的表型性状信息和单核苷酸多态性（single nucleotide polymorphism,SNP）基因型估计出每个SNP的效应值,然后测定候选群体中每个个体的SNP基因型,计算候选个体的基因组育种值,根据基因组育种值的高低对候选群体进行合理的选择。随着基因分型技术快速发展和检测成本不断降低,以及基因组选择方法不断优化,基因组选择已成为畜禽选种选育的重要手段。作者对一些常用的基因组选择方法进行了综述,比较了不同方法之间的差异,分析了基因组选择存在的问题与挑战,并展望了其在畜禽育种中的应用前景。  相似文献   

9.
旨在将整合元共祖的一步法(single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction with metafounders,MF-SSGBLUP)应用到基因组联合育种中,并与其他经典基因组选择方法进行比较分析。本研究使用QMSim软件模拟3个系谱相互独立的奶牛群体;分别使用广义最小二乘法(generalized least squares,GLS)和原始方法(naïve,NAI)估计不同群体间的祖先关系矩阵Γ;将MF-SSGBLUP、SSGBLUP和BLUP用于3个模拟群体的联合育种,评估各方法在遗传参数和育种值估计方面的差异。在不同遗传力下,GLS所得的Γ矩阵在对角线元素上略低于NAI法,在非对角线元素上没有明显差异,且基因组关系矩阵与基于元共祖构建的亲缘关系矩阵对角线元素相关系数(0.750~0.775)高于基因组关系矩阵与传统的亲缘关系矩阵相关系数(0.508~0.572)。MF-SSGBLUP遗传力估计值(0.138、0.140、0.297和0.298)与当代群体遗传力(0.107和0.296)的偏差小于其余两种方法(0.145、0.173、0.273和0.340),且MF-SSGBLUP估计育种值准确性(0.888~0.908)高于SSGBLUP法(0.863~0.876)和BLUP法(0.854~0.871)。表明,MF-SSGBLUP的遗传参数估计值无偏性更好,估计育种值准确性更高。根据上述模拟数据结果表明,在联合育种中,整合元共祖的基因组选择方法优于其他经典基因组选择方法。  相似文献   

10.
    
We present ms2gs, a combined coalescence – gene dropping (i.e. backward–forward) simulator for complex traits. It therefore aims at combining the advantages of both approaches. It is primarily conceived for very short term, recent scenarios such as those that are of interest in animal and plant breeding. It is very flexible in terms of defining QTL architecture and SNP ascertainment bias, and it allows for easy modelling of alternative markers such as RADs. It can use real sequence or chip data or generate molecular polymorphisms via the coalescence. It can generate QTL conditional on extant molecular information, such as low‐density genotyping. It models (simplistically) sequence, imputation or genotyping errors. It requires as input both genotypic data in plink or ms formats, and a pedigree that is used to perform the gene dropping. By default, it compares accuracy for BLUP, SNP ascertained data, sequence, and causal SNPs. It employs VanRaden's linear (GBLUP) and nonlinear method for incorporating molecular information. To illustrate the program, we present a small application in a half‐sib population and a multiparental (MAGIC) cross. The program, manual and examples are available at https://github.com/mperezenciso/ms2gs .  相似文献   

11.
We tested the following hypotheses: (i) breeding schemes with genomic selection are superior to breeding schemes without genomic selection regarding annual genetic gain of the aggregate genotype (ΔG(AG) ), annual genetic gain of the functional traits and rate of inbreeding per generation (ΔF), (ii) a positive interaction exists between the use of genotypic information and a short generation interval on ΔG(AG) and (iii) the inclusion of an indicator trait in the selection index will only result in a negligible increase in ΔG(AG) if genotypic information about the breeding goal trait is known. We examined four breeding schemes with or without genomic selection and with or without intensive use of young bulls using pseudo-genomic stochastic simulations. The breeding goal consisted of a milk production trait and a functional trait. The two breeding schemes with genomic selection resulted in higher ΔG(AG) , greater contributions of the functional trait to ΔG(AG) and lower ΔF than the two breeding schemes without genomic selection. Thus, the use of genotypic information may lead to more sustainable breeding schemes. In addition, a short generation interval increases the effect of using genotypic information on ΔG(AG) . Hence, a breeding scheme with genomic selection and with intensive use of young bulls (a turbo scheme) seems to offer the greatest potential. The third hypothesis was disproved as inclusion of genomically enhanced breeding values (GEBV) for an indicator trait in the selection index increased ΔG(AG) in the turbo scheme. Moreover, it increased the contribution of the functional trait to ΔG(AG) , and it decreased ΔF. Thus, indicator traits may still be profitable to use even when GEBV for the breeding goal traits are available.  相似文献   

12.
    
The availability of genomic information demands proper evaluation on how the kind (phenotypic versus genomic) and the amount of information influences the interplay of heritability (h2), genetic correlation () and economic weighting of traits with regard to the standard deviation of the index (σI). As σI is directly proportional to response to selection, it was the chosen parameter for comparing the indices. Three selection indices incorporating conventional and genomic information for a two trait (i and j) breeding goal were compared. Information sources were chosen corresponding to pig breeding applications. Index I incorporating an own performance in trait j served as reference scenario. In index II, additional information in both traits was contributed by a varying number of full‐sibs (2, 7, 50). In index III, the conventional own performance in trait j was combined with genomic information for both traits. The number of animals in the reference population (NP = 1000, 5000, 10 000) and thus the accuracy of GBVs were varied. With more information included in the index, σI became more independent of , and relative economic weighting. This applied for index II (more full‐sibs) and for index III (more accurate GBVs). Standard deviations of index II with seven full‐sibs and index III with NP = 1000 were similar when both traits had the same heritability. If the heritability of trait j was reduced ( = 0.1), σI of index III with NP = 1000 was clearly higher than for index II with seven full‐sibs. When enhancing the relative economic weight of trait j, the decrease in σI of the conventional full‐sib index was much stronger than for index III. Our results imply that NP = 1000 can be considered a minimum size for a reference population in pig breeding. These conclusions also hold for comparing the accuracies of the indices.  相似文献   

13.
    
With the new opportunities from DNA technology, multitier breeding schemes have the potential to become more effective and more integrated. Integrated breeding schemes can also be better adapted to account for potential genotype by environment interactions (G × E) between tiers. In this case, phenotypic and genotype information from lower tiers becomes more valuable as it involves measurement of traits that directly represent the breeding objective. The objective of this study was to compare scenarios that represented different selection strategies and their economic effectiveness in fine‐wool commercial sheep operations that exploit multitier breeding structures. Genomic selection (GS) applied in the multiplier and the commercial tier presented the largest additional revenue among all scenarios, as it resulted in the largest amount of genetic progress. The largest benefits from GS were outweighed by the genotyping costs, which made DNA parentage the most feasible strategy for the multiplier tier, resulting in the highest cumulative net present value (CNPV). The benefits of phenotypes and genotype information from the commercial environment were larger in the presence of G × E between the nucleus and the commercial tier. The CNPV was larger with a 50% reduction in genotyping costs, which increased the returns of GS scenarios by 2.7‐fold on average. Higher selection intensity when selecting multiplier rams also resulted in larger benefits. In this case, returns for the breeding scheme were 3.5‐fold higher when 33% of multiplier males were selected based on commercial information, compared to scenarios selecting 50% of the available multiplier rams. The benefits of collecting commercial phenotypes and genotypes were long term, which means that return on investment often took more than 10 years to be achieved, and were largely dependent on two‐stage selection to reduce cost while maintaining selection efficiency and on the cost of a genotype test.  相似文献   

14.
    
One of the main issues in genomic selection was the huge unbalance between number of markers and phenotypes available. In this work, principal component analysis is used to reduce the number of predictors for calculating direct genomic breeding values (DGV) for production and functional traits. 2093 Italian Holstein bulls were genotyped with the 54 K Illumina beadchip, and 39 555 SNP markers were retained after data editing. Principal Components (PC) were extracted from SNP matrix, and 15 207 PC explaining 99% of the original variance were retained and used as predictors. Bulls born before 2001 were included in the reference population, younger animals in the test population. A BLUP model was used to estimate the effect of principal component on deregressed proof (DRPF) for 35 traits and results were compared to those obtained by using SNP genotypes as predictors either with BLUP or with Bayes_A models. Correlations between DGV and DRPF did not substantially differ among the three methods except for milk fat content. The lowest prediction bias was obtained for the method based on the use of principal component. Regression coefficients of DRPF on DGV were lower than one for the approach based on the use of PC and higher than one for the other two methods. The use of PC as predictors resulted in a large reduction of number of predictors (approximately 38%) and of computational time that was approximately 2% of the time needed to estimate SNP effects with the other two methods. Accuracies of genomic predictions were in most of cases only slightly higher than those of the traditional pedigree index, probably due to the limited size of the considered population.  相似文献   

15.
数量性状是羊育种中的重要性状,受微效多基因控制、遗传力低,而传统育种方法难以提高羊的育种效率。提高动物育种效率对于选种选配工作和经济生产效益至关重要。随着育种新技术的不断革新与发展,基因组选择(genomic selection, GS)方法已成为育种技术中强大的工具,且已成功运用于个体经济价值较大的物种中,其具有缩短世代间隔、提高育种准确性、减少生产成本、提高畜禽经济效益等优势。近年来,由于基因组技术的不断成熟和各个统计模型的升级优化,以及高密度SNP芯片价格的下调,报告有关于基因组选择育种的实证和模拟研究层出不穷,且基因组选择技术已在羊育种中逐步开展,特别是在羊的重要性状中已有不少报道。由于羊的品种较多,地方性状差异化较大,个体经济价值略低,尽管基因组育种的新技术已经非常成熟,但目前仍没有在羊育种中大范围普及。为了更全面地了解该技术在羊育种中的研究现状,且基于选种选配的重要地位,作者就基因组选择在羊育种中的研究进展展开综述,主要从表型测定、基因分型、不同模型方面介绍了基因组选择在羊的重要性状中的应用和现状,讨论了其优势与挑战,并展望了基因组选择的未来发展方向。  相似文献   

16.
旨在基于Illumina BovineHD 770K与Cattle 110K芯片在华西牛中的实际应用情况;系统比较在不同标记密度下基因组选择预测准确性的差异;探索两款芯片在华西牛遗传评估中结合使用方法。本试验以课题组前期构建的华西牛基因组选择参考群体为研究对象;利用重测序数据将3 948头华西牛770K芯片填充至790K后;分别取90K(两款芯片交集)、110K、770K、790K(两款芯片并集)4种标记密度;对华西牛遗传评估所涉及的5个性状(断奶重、育肥期平均日增重、产犊难易度、胴体重、屠宰率)进行遗传力估计;并通过GBLUP模型利用五折交叉验证对基因组评估准确性进行比较;筛选并确定华西牛遗传评估中最适标记密度。结果显示:1)4种标记密度下;估计的华西牛5个性状遗传力差异不显著;断奶重和平均日增重的遗传力为0.47~0.50;属于高遗传力;胴体重为0.37~0.39;属于中等遗传力;产犊难易度和屠宰率性状为0.14~0.21;属于中低遗传力。2)在GBLUP评估模型中;Cattle 110K在各个性状上的预测准确性均表现良好;并较Illumina BovineHD 770K芯片有显著提升(P < 0.05);其中胴体重、产犊难易度和屠宰率3个性状提升较为明显;分别提升了14.9%、13.8%和8.4%;断奶重和育肥期平均日增重分别提升2.8%和4.5%。3)各性状预测准确性随着遗传力的升高而增加;不同标记密度的回归系数分别为0.439 2(90K)、0.374 1(110K)、0.413 6(770K)、0.459 3(790K)。因此;在华西牛实际遗传评估中;可直接使用Cattle 110K芯片进行评估;在获得较好评估准确性的同时降低成本。  相似文献   

17.
    
The premise was tested that the additional genetic gain was achieved in the overall breeding objective in a pig breeding program using genomic selection (GS) compared to a conventional breeding program, however, some traits achieved larger gain than other traits. GS scenarios based on different reference population sizes were evaluated. The scenarios were compared using a deterministic simulation model to predict genetic gain in scenarios with and without using genomic information as an additional information source. All scenarios were compared based on selection accuracy and predicted genetic gain per round of selection for objective traits in both sire and dam lines. The results showed that GS scenarios increased overall response in the breeding objectives by 9% to 56% and 3.5% to 27% in the dam and sire lines, respectively. The difference in response resulted from differences in the size of the reference population. Although all traits achieved higher selection accuracy in GS, traits with limited phenotypic information at the time of selection or with low heritability, such as sow longevity, number of piglets born alive, pre- and post-weaning survival, as well as meat and carcass quality traits achieved the largest additional response. This additional response came at the expense of smaller responses for traits that are easy to measure, such as back fat and average daily gain in GS compared to the conventional breeding program. Sow longevity and drip loss percentage did not change in a favourable direction in GS with a reference population of 500 pigs. With a reference population of 1000 pigs or onwards, sow longevity and drip loss percentage began to change in a favourable direction. Despite the smaller responses for average daily gain and back fat thickness in GS, the overall breeding objective achieved additional gain in GS.  相似文献   

18.
    
The aim of this article was to study opportunities for improvement of the indigenous and threatened Red Maasai sheep (RM) in Kenya, by comparing purebreeding with crossbreeding with Dorper sheep (D) as a terminal breed, in two different environments (Env. A and a harsher Env. B), assuming different levels of genotype‐by‐environment interaction (G × E). Breeding goals differed between environments and breeds. Four scenarios of nucleus breeding schemes were stochastically simulated, with the nucleus in Env. A. Overall, results showed an increase in carcass weight produced per ewe by more than 10% over 15 years. Genetic gain in carcass weight was 0.17 genetic SD/year (0.2 kg/year) across scenarios for RM in the less harsh Env. A. For survival and milk yield, the gain was lower (0.04–0.05 genetic SD/year). With stronger G × E, the gain in the commercial tier for RM in the harsher Env. B became increasingly lower. Selection of females also within the commercial tier gave slightly higher genetic gain. The scenario with purebreeding of RM and a subnucleus in Env. B gave the highest total income and quantity of meat. However, quantity of meat in Env. A increased slightly from having crossbreeding with D, whereas that in Env. B decreased. A simple and well‐designed nucleus breeding programme would increase the genetic potential of RM. Crossbreeding of RM with D is not recommended for harsh environmental conditions due to the large breed differences expected in that environment.  相似文献   

19.
    
The accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs) is an important parameter in livestock genetic improvement. It is used to calculate response to selection and to express the credibility of individual EBVs. Although it is well-known that selection reduces accuracy, this effect is not well-studied and accuracies from genetic evaluations are not adjusted for selection. This work investigates the effect of selection on accuracy of EBVs estimated using best linear unbiased predictors. Results show that accuracies in a selected population may be considerably smaller than the ordinary accuracy from genetic evaluation. Accuracy of the parent average is dramatically reduced by selection, up to a factor of three. Expressions for equilibrium accuracies in selected populations are presented and depend only on the unselected accuracy and the intensity of selection. Thus, schemes with the same unselected accuracy and intensity of selection also have the same equilibrium accuracy and response to selection. At the same unselected accuracy, therefore, schemes based on between-family information do not show greater reduction in response and accuracy because of the Bulmer effect. An example shows that benefit of genomic selection may be underestimated when the effect of selection on accuracy is ignored. Finally, this work argues that the SE of an EBV and the correlation between true and EBVs are different things, and that accuracies should not be adjusted for selection when they primarily serve to indicate the SEs of EBVs.  相似文献   

20.
相较于传统的育种方法,全基因组选择（genomic selection,GS）通过对拟留种的个体进行早期选择和增加选择的准确性进而加快育种的遗传进展。通过改进GS方法无法再缩短育种的世代间隔,因而如何提高GS的准确性以获得额外的遗传进展一直是GS研究的核心问题。当前,各种组学技术不断成熟,从公开的资料或前期的研究积累获取生物学先验信息已比较容易。因而,如何在GS模型中整合已知的先验信息进而提高GS的准确性以获得额外的遗传进展成为当前育种研究的热点问题。本文对生物学先验信息的类型以及整合先验信息的GS方法进行综述,探讨了这些方法在家畜育种中的应用和前景,以期为家畜育种中开展整合生物学先验信息的GS研究提供借鉴与参考。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号