Risk factors associated with injuries in thoroughbred horses.

A case-control study was conducted on Thoroughbred horses to identify factors associated with the risk of breakdown on racetracks. A total of 310 cases (breakdowns) were identified from the Horse Identification Department records kept by the chief examining veterinarian of New York Racing Association. For each case, two control horses were selected randomly from the Daily Racing Form Inc. records. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify and quantify the risk of factors associated with breakdown, while simultaneously controlling for the effect of other putative factors. Factors associated with risk of breakdown were: track (horses raced on Saratoga racetrack were at a lesser risk of breakdown), track composition/condition (turf tracks had a lower risk compared to dirt), number of seasons in race, racing in a later race, number of starts per year, the total number of starts, season (summer had a higher risk than winter or spring) and age of the horse.     

Race-start characteristics and risk of catastrophic musculoskeletal injury in Thoroughbred racehorses

OBJECTIVE: To identify race-start characteristics associated with catastrophic musculoskeletal (MS) injury in Thoroughbred racehorses at 2 racetracks in Florida during 1995 through 1998. DESIGN: Matched case-control study. ANIMALS: 97 Thoroughbreds (case horses) that incurred a catastrophic MS injury during racing and 388 Thoroughbreds (control horses) randomly selected from noninjured participants and matched on the basis of racetrack and year. PROCEDURE: Incidence of MS injury was calculated for all race meets at 2 racetracks in Florida from 1995 through 1998. Race-start characteristics were compared among case and control horses, using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall incidence of MS injury was 1.2/1,000 race starts (97/79,416 starts). Incidence of injury was significantly higher for turf races (2.3/1,000 starts) than for dirt races (0.9/1,000 starts). Sex, number of days since last race, and racing surface were associated with risk of injury; geldings, > or = 33 days since the last race, and turf racing surface were associated with a higher risk of injury. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Incidence of injury among Thoroughbreds in Florida was associated with sex, number of days since last race, and racing surface. Days since last race may have been an indicator of previous health and lameness problems. Racing surface may have been a risk factor for MS injury because turf races tended to be more competitive than dirt races. Horses running in turf races were more likely to participate in races with a large field, handicap races, long races, and races with high purses.     

Comparison of two different statistical models considering individual races or racetracks for evaluation of German trotters

Two different statistical models considering racetrack or individual race as fixed effect were compared, regarding genetic parameters and by using cross validation. Data for variance component estimation consisted of 48,942 performance observations from 4249 trotters. Variance components for the traits square root of rank at finish, racing time per km, and log of earnings per race were estimated by REML using two multiple trait animal models involving different racetracks or individual races. When including each individual race instead of racetracks in the statistical model, heritabilities increased from 0.05 to 0.07, 0.19 to 0.23, and 0.08 to 0.09 for square root of rank at finish, racing time per km, and log of earnings per race, respectively. Genetic and phenotypic correlations among traits increased also after consideration of individual races. Square root of rank at finish, as well as racing time per km and log of earnings per race, was highly genetically correlated with −0.99 and −0.88. The two statistical models were compared on the basis of their predictive ability by using cross validation. Data for these analyses consisted of 706,082 observations from 21,363 trotters. Randomly eliminated performance observations were predicted by cumulation of fixed and random effects obtained from estimation of breeding values for both models. Estimates for racing time showed lower bias and mean square error (MSE) when considering individual races instead of racetracks. Also, the correlation between predicted and true phenotypic value increased from 0.85 to 0.92. Estimates for square root of rank at finish were unbiased, but with a higher MSE when considering individual race effect. A similar high bias and MSE with both models were obtained for log of earnings. In order to avoid bias in estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for racing time and square root of rank at finish, inclusion of each individual race in the statistical model was recommended.     

Influence of Track Surface Condition on Racing Times of Thoroughbred Racehorses in Flat Races

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of race track surface condition on the racing time of Thoroughbred racehorses in flat races isolated from the effects of differences in racecourse and racing distance. The effects of track surface condition, racecourse, and racing distance on the racing time of Thoroughbreds in flat races at 10 Japan Racing Association racecourses during a period of 5 years (2000-2004) were evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis. Track surface condition significantly affected the race time, although this effect differed between turf and dirt courses. On turf courses, racing times for different track surface conditions were, from shortest to longest, in order of firm<good<yielding<soft. On dirt courses, racing times for different track conditions were from shortest to longest, in order of muddy<good<sloppy<fast. For dirt courses, the effect of racecourse on racing time was greater than that of track surface condition, indicating the existence of racecourse-related nonbiological factors that significantly influenced racing time. When the effects of the differences in racecourse and racing distance were removed, track surface condition conclusively influenced racing time in flat races.     

Track condition and racing injuries in thoroughbred horses

The incidences of fractures and soft tissue injuries during 68397 starts of thoroughbred horses at New York Racing Association tracks were analyzed concerning track condition, dirt and turf tracks, environmental conditions, length of races, location of fractures on the track, and age of horses. It was concluded that the conditions evaluated are of no importance in the occurrence of racing injuries to thoroughbred horses.     

The risk of severity of limb injuries in racing thoroughbred horses.

A retrospective study was carried out to identify factors which predisposed Thoroughbred horses to severe injuries, as compared to less severe injuries, while racing on New York Racing Association (NYRA) tracks during the period of January 1986 to June 1988. A severe injury was defined as an injury which led to humane destruction of the horse. A less severe injury was defined as a horse which didn't race within 6 months following a muscular, ligament, tendon, or skeletal injury on the racetrack. The data were obtained from the Horse Identification Department records kept by the Chief Examining Veterinarian of NYRA and included 55 severely injured horses and 245 less severely injured horses. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the risk of severe injuries compared to less severe injuries in those horses. There was a significant association between track and the risk of severe injury (horses raced on Belmont and Saratoga were more likely to develop a severe injury compared to horses raced on Aqueduct Main). The track surface was also associated with the risk of severe injury (horses raced on a firm turf had a significantly lower risk of severe injury associated with the track was significantly modified by the track condition (horses raced at Belmont when it was muddy had a significantly increased risk compared to Aqueduct dirt). Horses were more likely to experience severe injury in the early part of the race (less than or equal to 6 furlongs) than the latter part of the race (greater than 6 furlongs). The risk of severe injury decreased with the age of the horse.     

The relationship of length of race to fatigue and lameness in thoroughbred racehorses

Horses experience greater fatigue lameness and bone fracture-breakdown at certain race distances. It is predicted that lameness would be reduced about 14% and bonefracture-breakdown about 24% if these distances were eliminated.It is generally believed but inadequately documented, and difficult to prove, that fatigue is a significant factor among the causes of lameness in horses, particularly horses working at speed. In a previous report (1) preliminary data were presented on 94 races which suggested that the fatigue experienced by Thoroughbred racehorses was, in part, a function of the length of the race. In this report a larger number of races have been examined, and the frequency of bone fracture in relation to race length has been examined.From the Past Performances of several issues of The Racing Form, 234 races were taken by chance for analysis. No attempt was made to sort the races by track, quality, age of starters, etc. Races at tracks from all major racing areas in the United States were included.The fractional times given in the Past Performances were used to calculate the velocity of the horse in the lead for each segment of the race. The velocities, then, are population velocities for the population of horses in the race and not for individual horses. From this data the drop in velocity was calculated from one segment of the race to the next. All the data are presented as the mean and standard deviation of the total number of races examined and are in feet/second.In order to have some comparison of the population data with individual horse performance, two horses were selected, and their segment velocities and velocity drops calculated for races at different distances.Data were available from one racing venue for determination of the frequency of lameness in relation to race length. This data consisted of the horses coming out of a race lame enough to be assigned to the “vet's list.” There were 2006 races and 443 horses placed on the vet's list during one 12 month period. There were 2036 races and 407 horses listed during the next 12 month period. Data from a second racing venue were available for one 12 month period and consisted of horses which fractured a bone in a race.     

A prospective cohort study to investigate risk factors for horse falls in UK hurdle and steeplechase racing

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Equine fatalities during racing continue to be a major welfare concern and falls at fences are responsible for a proportion of all equine fatalities recorded on racecourses. OBJECTIVES: To identify and quantify risk factors for horse falls in National Hunt (NH) racing and to report the frequency of falling and falling-associated fatalities. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 2879 horse starts in hurdle and steeplechase races on 6 UK racecourses. Any horse that suffered a fall at a steeplechase or hurdle fence during the race was defined as a case. Data were obtained by interview and observations in the parade ring and from commercial databases. Multivariable logistic regression models, allowing for clustering at the level of the track, were used to identify the relationship between variables and the risk of falling. RESULTS: There were 124 falling cases (32 in hurdling and 92 in steeplechasing) identified. The injury risk of fallers was 8.9% and fatality risk 6.5%. Duration of journey to the racecourse, behaviour in the parade ring and weather at the time of the race were associated with falling in both hurdle and steeplechase racing. Age, amount of rainfall and going were also associated with falling in steeplechase racing. CONCLUSIONS: Falls at fences are significant contributors to equine fatalities during NH racing. Potentially modifiable risk factors identified were the condition of track surfaces and journey time to the racecourse. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: It is hoped that information from this study may be used in future interventions to improve horse and jockey safety in racing. The study has also identified areas requiring further research, such as equine behaviour and its effect on racing performance, and the effect of light conditions on jumping ability.     

Results of physical inspection before races and race-related characteristics and their association with musculoskeletal injuries in Thoroughbreds during races.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relative risk of injury among horses deemed to be at increased risk of injury on the basis of prerace physical inspection findings and to examine the association of injury during races with race-related characteristics. DESIGN: Cohort study. ANIMALS: 2,187 Thoroughbred horses that started 3,227 races in Kentucky. PROCEDURE: All race starts for which a horse was deemed to be at increased risk of injury on the basis of prerace physical inspection findings and a random sample of race starts for which horses were not deemed at increased risk of injury were included in the study. Findings of prerace physical inspection, race-related characteristics, and outcome of the race (race results and whether the horse incurred an injury) were recorded for each race start. Race starts in which a horse incurred an injury during a race were compared with race starts in which injuries were not incurred to identify factors associated with injury during races. RESULTS: Abnormality of the suspensory ligament of the forelimbs detected during prerace physical inspection, racetrack, class of race (claiming race < or = $25,000 vs other classes), and distance of race (< 7 furlongs vs other distances) were significantly associated with increased risk of injury. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prerace physical inspection findings, particularly abnormalities of the suspensory ligament, may be used to identify horses at increased risk of injury during races. Rate of injury differed among racetracks, and horses in certain types of races (lower-priced claiming races and races of shorter distance) may be at increased risk of injury during races.     

Inheritance of racing performance of Thoroughbred horses

Horse racing is a contest between horses, usually held for the purpose of betting. Thoroughbred horse racing is the most diffused form of horse racing throughout the world. Thoroughbred is one of the most versatile of horse breeds and has influenced the development of many other breeds. Thoroughbred horses served as a foundation stock for the development of the light horse breeds. The two types of horse racing are flat racing and jumping races/steeplechases. The measures of racing performance are broadly classified into three categories. They are time and its several variations, handicap or similar performance ratings and earnings. One common measure of the performance of racehorses evaluated genetically is racing time or final time. The heritability estimates differed according to method of estimation, age, sex, track and distance. Time measure generally had a heritability in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 with the higher values for shorter races. For handicap and earning measures the heritabilities reported were generally higher in the range of 0.3 to 0.4; hence these may be considered in genetic evaluation of racing performance of Thoroughbred horses. The average generation interval of Thoroughbred horses was 11.2 ± 4.5 and 9.7 ± 3.8 years for males and females respectively, which limits the genetic progress in racing horses. However, the major advantage is that the racing performance may be evaluated in both males and females and repeated observations can be obtained on the same animal in relatively short periods. These factors coupled with the reasonable heritability of some measures of racing performance, suggest that mass selection based on performance tests would be the selection procedure of choice to improve the racing performance of Thoroughbred horses. In general, the inbreeding at the rate that is usually practised in Thoroughbred population does not enable much gene fixing. However, practice of close inbreeding may be avoided, even though it still fascinates breeders at subconscious level.     

Benefits and risks of barefoot harness racing in Standardbred trotters

There is a lack of research on the benefits and risks of shoeing conditions in harness racing. Thus, our objectives were to: (a) investigate whether velocity times (VT; s/km) are affected by racing unshod (N = 76,932 records on 5,247 horses); (b) determine the potential risks of galloping, being penalized, and disqualification when competing unshod (N = 111,755 records on 6,423 horses); and (c) identify additional environmental factors that affect VT and risks. VT was found to be significantly influenced by shoeing condition (e.g., unshod, shod front, shod hind, or fully shod), but also by sex, age, season, track, track condition, start method, start position, distance, and driver‐horse performance level (p < 2e‐16). The risks of galloping and disqualification were significantly influenced by shoeing condition, sex, age, season, track, start method, start position, or driver‐horse performance level (p ≤ .05). Horses racing unshod had 0.7 s/km lower VT than fully shod horses and showed better performance when racing on neutral tracks during the late summer than horses with other shoeing conditions during the same period. However, racing unshod increased the relative risks of galloping and disqualification by 15%–35% in all seasons. Horses shod only on the hind hooves showed better performance than fully shod horses, without higher risks associated with competing unshod.     

Effect of training location and time period on racehorse performance in New Zealand. 1. Descriptive analysis

AIM: To describe characteristics of Thoroughbred training stables in Matamata and in all other locations in New Zealand combined, over two 19-month time periods in 1996–1997 and 1998–1999, representing equal length periods immediately prior to and after the construction of a new training surface at the Matamata Racing Club.

METHODS: Retrospective records covering all horses training and racing in New Zealand during two 19-month time periods (1996–1997 and 1998–1999), covering 161 locations, were obtained from New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing (NZTR). Outcome variables included whether a horse was raced again in the 6 months following any start in the first 13 months of either time period, number of race starts for every horse, and finishing position. Summary measures with confidence intervals (CI) and unadjusted odds ratios (OR), measuring strength of associations for various factors, were computed.

RESULTS: The datasets contained information on 45,446 horses, 11,336 races, 5,110 trials and a total of 110,643 race starts. Horses trained at Matamata represented 8% (3,715) of the total horse datasets, and accounted for 11,977 race starts (10.8%). They were more likely to start in a race or trial in either time period and were 1.4 and 1.3 times as likely to finish first, second or third compared with horses trained at other locations in 1996–1997 and 1998–1999, respectively. A 6-month no-race period occurred for 9,306/12,584 (74%) horses that started at least once in the first 13 months of either time period. Horses trained at Matamata were less likely to have a 6-month no-race period than horses trained at other locations in both time periods. There was no effect of time period within each location on the probability of either a horse having a 6-month no-race period or of a race start being followed by a 6-month no-race period, but there was an overall effect of time and more 6-month no-race periods were observed in 1998–1999 relative to 1996–1997.

CONCLUSION: Summary statistics are presented for Thoroughbred racing in New Zealand over two 19-month time periods. Differences between the populations of horses trained in Matamata compared with those trained at other locations were attributed, in part, to the fact that many of the more successful racehorse trainers in the country have stables at Matamata. As a result, the population of horses in Matamata may not be representative of the racehorse population in New Zealand. Although more likely to win or place in both time periods, the magnitude of the advantage to horses in Matamata was reduced in 1998–1999 relative to 1996–1997, and this could be due, in part, to effects of the new track surface at Matamata. There was no evidence of a rise in risk of a 6-month no-race period following any race start in those horses trained in Matamata in 1998–1999 relative to either horses trained at other locations or to horses trained in Matamata during the earlier time period.     

Retrospective trainer-reported incidence and predictors of health and training-related problems in standardbred racehorses

Information on the incidence of injury, illness, and unexplained loss of athletic performance of 2345 Standardbred racehorses was gathered from a telephone survey of 177 trainers during the 1996-1997 season. Trainer-reported incidence of infection and illness (18%) was higher than the incidence of musculoskeletal problems (10%) or unexplained athletic performance loss (6%). Older horses (>5 years) were more likely to develop musculoskeletal problems (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; confidence interval [CI] = 1.8-8.2) and performance loss OR = 2.3, CI = 1.1-5.2) than 2-year-old horses. Horses were more likely to suffer musculoskeletal problems if fast-worked on tracks or surfaces with no banking compared with those fast-worked on tracks with banking similar to commercial racetracks OR = 4.6, CI = 2.0-9.9). Horses given no warm-up before high-intensity exercise were more likely to suffer a musculoskeletal problem than horses given a light warm-up of 1 to 9 minutes OR = 2.5, CI = 1.5-4.4). Horses trained for more than 164 min·wk⁻¹ were more likely to suffer musculoskeletal problems OR = 1.7, CI = 1.1-2.8) and athletic performance loss OR = 2.5, CI = 1.4-4.4) than horses trained for shorter periods. Horses given a moderate weekly exercise duration (132-148 min·wk⁻¹) had the lowest rates of infection and illness, but short (114-131 min·wk⁻¹) or very long (>164 min·wk⁻¹) weekly exercise duration increased the risk of horses suffering infection and illness OR = 1.6, CI = 1.1-2.2 and OR = 1.3, CI = 1.0-1.9, respectively). We conclude that Standardbred trainers could avoid many training and health problems by using well-banked tracks, providing a proper warm-up, and avoiding excessive training.

Introduction

Racehorses suffer from a variety of health and training problems that may result in poor performance. Musculoskeletal injury is a major problem in Thoroughbred racehorses, accounting for as much as 53% of the lost training and racing days.[1 and 2] Thoroughbreds that race too often, [2 and 3] have insufficient training before racing, [4] or perform too much high-speed work [5] have a greater risk of musculoskeletal problems. Performance may also be affected by respiratory infection, which is responsible for 12% of lost training or racing days. [1]Poor performance can also develop in an otherwise apparently healthy horse. Such unexplained loss of athletic performance may arise from undiagnosed health problems or from too much training.[6] Overtraining described as a state of prolonged fatigue caused by too much training or insufficient recovery [7] has been demonstrated in horses in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, [8 and 9] but the incidence of athletic performance loss because of overtraining in the population is unknown. Recently reported prospective studies that used the same group of horses has found that overtraining appeared to be difficult to induce in horses, [10, 11, 12 and 13] which may indicate that overtraining accounts for little of the loss in athletic performance suffered by Standardbred racehorses.It is thought that lameness is the most important cause of poor racing performance in Standardbreds[14]; however, the incidence of musculoskeletal problems causing lameness in Standardbreds is lacking. There is also little information on the incidence of respiratory disease or athletic performance loss in Standardbreds. The purpose of this study was to determine the trainer-reported incidence of these problems in Standardbred racehorses and to reveal any association with factors such as sex, age, ability, training, track surface, and track design.

Materials and methods

A survey was administered by telephone to 177 Standardbred racehorse trainers randomly selected from a list of 300 trainers compiled by Harness Racing New Zealand. The survey was administered at the end of the 1996-1997 racing season, which lasts from about September through June, and questions asked during the survey related to the 1996-1997 racing season. Trainers were asked to recall the total number of horses that experienced an unexplained and consistent loss of athletic performance (“performance decrease that lasted for at least two weeks, which was not obviously as a result of tying up, infection, illness, or musculoskeletal problems”). Trainers were also asked for the total number of horses that suffered infection or illness (viral and bacterial infections and respiratory diseases but not bleeding from the lungs), and musculoskeletal problems (lameness caused by muscle, tendon, bone, or back injuries that resulted in lost training days). Pilot work involved testing the questionnaire on 10 local horse trainers; from their feedback and that of other colleagues and horse trainers, more than 11 revisions were made. The interview consisted of 65 questions and lasted approximately 20 minutes. The incidences of performance loss and health problems detailed in this study are trainer-diagnosed; however, in the majority of cases (80%), the horses were also examined by a veterinarian and their diagnosis was consistent with the trainer's. Unfortunately, full details of the veterinary examination were not obtained during this study.To examine the influence of track design and banking, trainers were asked to compare the banking of their training tracks to the banking of a commercial racetrack (Forbury Park Raceway, Dunedin, New Zealand, which had a banking angle of approximately 2.3 degrees). Trainers had to decide whether the banking of their track was more, less, or about the same as the banking of the commercial track. Because of the need to keep the questionnaire to a reasonable size, in-depth training data was collected on only one particular group of horses—qualified maidens. Qualified maiden racehorses (previously raced but unplaced) represent the largest group of racehorses in training in New Zealand. Trainers were also asked whether they trained their other horses (faster, slower, unqualified, 1-7, or >7 wins) any differently from the qualified maidens. Information on training type, duration, and intensity were gathered for each day of a typical training week. Exercise duration and total training workload was divided into quintiles (5 equal sections) and contrasts between the quintiles were then examined. Trainers were specifically asked about the duration of the warm-up, which was not included in the total training time. Warm-up was defined as the initial preparatory phase of a training session in which the horse is slowly accustomed to low-intensity exercise and prepared for further high-intensity exercise.Although it is acknowledged that career wins is a crude method of assessing racing ability, it was the most appropriate method available to the researchers during a phone interview that gave some indication of horses' ability. Trainers were therefore asked about the number of wins for each horse and horses were grouped according to the total number of career wins. The Human Ethics Committee of the University of Otago reviewed and approved this project (reference number 97/049).The survey data were analyzed using a repeated-measures general modeling procedure (Proc Genmod, SAS Institute, Cary, NC), which estimated the effect of age, sex, gait, number of wins, warm-up, track design, training duration, and workload as odds ratios ORs). The OR is a way of comparing whether the probability of a certain event is the same for two groups. An OR of 1 implies that the event is equally likely in both groups, whereas an OR of more than one implies that the event is more likely in the first group compared with the second. For example, the odds of a horse suffering a musculoskeletal injury if fast-worked on tracks with no banking is 0.52 (cases/noncases = 12 injured/23 noninjured), whereas the odds of a horse suffering a musculoskeletal injury on well-banked tracks is 0.11 (37 injured/329 noninjured). Therefore, the OR is 4.6 and is interpreted as: 4.6 horses suffer a musculoskeletal injury if fast-worked on an unbanked track compared with every 1 horse that suffers the same injury when fast-worked on well-banked tracks. Proc Genmod (SAS Institute) analyzed the total number of horses in a particular subgroup and the total number of problems in the same subgroup for each trainer. A type I error of 5% was chosen for declaration of statistical significance; precision of estimates was represented by the 95% confidence interval (CI), the likely range of the true value.To estimate the reliability of the trainer's responses, a second questionnaire identical to the first was administered to 17 randomly selected trainers from the same sample 8 months after the original survey. The trainers' responses to the same questions from separate surveys given 8 months apart were used to gauge reliability of the survey. Questions on the sex, gait, and number of race wins of the horses under the trainers' care that suffered health and training-related problems were analyzed. These variables represented population characteristics of the horses that could change with time as horses entered or left the trainers stables, and therefore affect the reliability of the reported data. Survey reliability was found by comparing the empirical standard error of the odds ratio from the initial (Main) and second (Rely) surveys after adjustment for sample size. When the empirical standard error was similar (within one decimal place) between studies, then reliability was considered low, but when the empirical standard error was smaller in the Rely survey compared with the Main survey, then the reliability of the survey was acceptable.

Results

Overall training and health problems

Horses were 2.1 times more likely to suffer from infections and illness than from musculoskeletal problems (CI = 1.4-2.8, P < .001) and musculoskeletal problems were 1.7 times more likely to occur than athletic performance loss (CI = 1.2-2.3, P < .001). Horses that had no recognized problems raced 12 ± 6 times (mean ± SD) over the main racing season (September 1996-June 1997).

Athletic performance loss

Sixty-eight trainers reported that a total of 146 horses developed a decrease in athletic performance not readily associated with musculoskeletal injury, illness, or tying-up during the season (6% of the 2345 horses sampled). Most horses (78%) that suffered athletic performance loss required at least 6 weeks to recover to normal form; the remaining 22% recovered within 4 weeks. In general, the decrease in athletic performance occurred towards the middle and end of the racing season. The incidence of athletic performance loss in the various subgroups of horses is shown in Table 1, and the ORs and confidence limits for statistically significant differences in incidence within each subgroup are shown in Table 2.     

Effect of training location and time period on racehorse performance in New Zealand. 1. Descriptive analysis

AIM: To describe characteristics of Thoroughbred training stables in Matamata and in all other locations in New Zealand combined, over two 19-month time periods in 1996-1997 and 1998-1999, representing equal length periods immediately prior to and after the construction of a new training surface at the Matamata Racing Club. METHODS: Retrospective records covering all horses training and racing in New Zealand during two 19-month time periods (1996-1997 and 1998-1999), covering 161 locations, were obtained from New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing (NZTR). Outcome variables included whether a horse was raced again in the 6 months following any start in the first 13 months of either time period, number of race starts for every horse, and finishing position. Summary measures with confidence intervals (CI) and unadjusted odds ratios (OR), measuring strength of associations for various factors, were computed. RESULTS: The datasets contained information on 45,446 horses, 11,336 races, 5,110 trials and a total of 110,643 race starts. Horses trained at Matamata represented 8% (3,715) of the total horse datasets, and accounted for 11,977 race starts (10.8%). They were more likely to start in a race or trial in either time period and were 1.4 and 1.3 times as likely to finish first, second or third compared with horses trained at other locations in 1996-1997 and 1998-1999, respectively. A 6-month no-race period occurred for 9,306/12,584 (74%) horses that started at least once in the first 13 months of either time period. Horses trained at Matamata were less likely to have a 6-month no-race period than horses trained at other locations in both time periods. There was no effect of time period within each location on the probability of either a horse having a 6-month no-race period or of a race start being followed by a 6-month no-race period, but there was an overall effect of time and more 6-month no-race periods were observed in 1998-1999 relative to 1996-1997. CONCLUSION: Summary statistics are presented for Thoroughbred racing in New Zealand over two 19-month time periods. Differences between the populations of horses trained in Matamata compared with those trained at other locations were attributed, in part, to the fact that many of the more successful racehorse trainers in the country have stables at Matamata. As a result, the population of horses in Matamata may not be representative of the racehorse population in New Zealand. Although more likely to win or place in both time periods, the magnitude of the advantage to horses in Matamata was reduced in 1998-1999 relative to 1996-1997, and this could be due, in part, to effects of the new track surface at Matamata. There was no evidence of a rise in risk of a 6-month no-race period following any race start in those horses trained in Matamata in 1998-1999 relative to either horses trained at other locations or to horses trained in Matamata during the earlier time period.     

Risk of fatality and causes of death of Thoroughbred horses associated with racing in Victoria, Australia: 1989-2004

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Determining the risk of fatality of Thoroughbred horses while racing is essential to assess the impact of intervention measures designed to minimise such fatalities. OBJECTIVES: To measure the risk of racehorse fatality in jump and flat starts on racecourses in Victoria, Australia, over a 15 year period and to determine proportional mortality rates for specific causes of death. METHODS: All fatalities of Thoroughbred horses that occurred during or within 24 h of a race were identified from a database. The risk of a start resulting in a racehorse fatality in all races and within flat and jump races, proportional mortality rates, population attributable risk, population attributable fraction and risk ratios were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals. Poisson regression was also performed to estimate risk ratios. RESULTS: There were 514 fatalities over the 15 year period; 316 in flat races and 198 in jump races. The risk of fatality was 0.44 per 1000 flat starts and 8.3 per 1000 jump starts (18.9 x greater). The risk of fatality on city tracks was 1.1 per 1000 starts whereas on country tracks it was 0.57 per 1000 starts. Of the 316 fatalities in flat races, 73.4% were due to limb injury, 2.5% to cranial or vertebral injury and 19.0% were sudden deaths. Of the 198 fatalities in jump races, 68.7% were due to limb injury, 16.2% to cranial or vertebral injury and 3.5% were sudden deaths. The risk of fatality in flat starts increased between 1989 and 2004 but the risk in jump starts remained unchanged over the 15 year period. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of fatality in flat starts was lower in Victoria than North America and the UK but the risk in jump starts was greater. Catastrophic limb injury was the major reason for racehorse fatality in Victoria but there was a larger percentage of sudden deaths than has been reported overseas. The risk of fatality in jump starts remained constant over the study period despite jump racing reviews that recommended changes to hurdle and steeple races to improve safety. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: This study provides important benchmarks for the racing industry to monitor racetrack fatalities and evaluate intervention strategies.     

The effect of racetrack design on gait symmetry of the pacer.

A survey of a western Canadian racetrack determined the superelevation and transition curves to be less than the cited design standards. High-speed cinematography was used to film seven Standardbred pacers as they proceeded around one curve of the track at racing speed and for each horse 19 temporal stride parameters were obtained from these films using a film analyzer system. Average velocities were calculated and the mean stride length was found to vary from 5.08 m to 5.77 m. In all frames analyzed the hind foot was observed to contact the track surface prior to the ipsilateral forefoot and all horses displayed significant (p less than 0.05) contralateral asymmetry of some temporal stride parameters. Fifteen temporal stride parameters were significantly different (p less than 0.05) when compared between horses but only three temporal stride parameters were significantly different (p less than 0.05) when their values were compared between segments of the curved portions of the track. It is suggested that temporal gait asymmetry should not be used to judge the standards of racetrack design.     

Fractures sustained by racehorses in Japan during flat racing with special reference to track condition and racing time

The purpose of this report is to describe the results of epidemiological surveys of racing-related fractures in Thoroughbred horses in Japan. In the period 1987-2000, a total of 10,203 fractures were diagnosed in 556,705 runners, resulting in an overall incidence of 1.83%. The annual incidence of fractures in flat racing during the 14-year period fluctuated between 1.44% and 2.19%. The majority of fractures affected the forelimbs. We found significant effects of track condition on injury incidence. The incidence of fractures decreased as track conditions on turf became softer and increased as track conditions on dirt became muddier. Because of the general trend for the incidence of fractures to vary with track condition, we examined the relationship between track conditions and racing times for winning horses in 4117 races and for 50,564 overall runners for the period 1990-1994 on two tracks. For turf courses, racing times became longer as track conditions became softer. In contrast, for dirt courses, racing time tended to become shorter in muddier conditions. The variation in the incidence of fracture with track condition might be due to the corresponding difference in racing time.