A complex-trapping-blocking (CTB) ELISA, using monoclonal antibodies and detecting specifically antibodies directed against foot-and-mouth disease types A, O and C. II. Application

The complex-trapping-blocking (CTB) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was evaluated to detect antibodies directed against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) strains A10 Holland, O1 BFS, and C1 Detmold. Log10 serum titres of uninfected, unvaccinated cattle (n = 100) were less than 1.80 in the CTB-ELISA. Sera from cattle vaccinated with either monovalent or trivalent vaccines were tested in both the CTB-ELISA and the serum neutralisation test (SNT); titres in both tests correlated positively (P less than 0.001). Titres of sera from cattle, sheep, and pigs vaccinated twice with FMDV A10 Holland also correlated positively in both tests. In another experiment, cattle vaccinated with FMDV strain C1 Detmold were intradermolingually challenged 3 weeks after primary vaccination; at the same time two controls were challenged. At 8 days after challenge, serum titres of the controls were distinctly higher in the CTB-ELISA than in the SNT, whereas serum titres of the vaccinated cattle were equally high in both tests. In potency tests for monovalent vaccines against FMDV strains A10 Holland, O1 BFS or C1 Detmold, serum titres correlated strongly in both tests with protection against the homologous FMDV strain. We concluded that the CTB-ELISA is not only sensitive, but easier to perform and more rapid and reproducible than the SNT. The CTB-ELISA may be useful in evaluating the immune response in cattle during FMD vaccine potency tests.     

Testing the effectiveness of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines: the relationship between test infection results and corresponding neutralization titers of vaccinated cattle

In the course of vaccine controls, the potency of 25 foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines was tested quantitatively in parallel in cattle using the intradermal infection and the determination of the SN titres. More than 95% of the vaccinated cattle with SN titres of greater than 1:20 were protected from generalized FMD, regardless of the virus type tested. 61.5% of the vaccinated cattle with SN titres less than or equal to 1:20 were not protected and developed generalized FMD. Comparison of the PD50 values calculated from the results of the intradermal infection and the corresponding SN titres (minimum protection titre greater than 1:20) showed that the results were in complete agreement in 56% of the tested vaccines. In a further 32% of vaccines, the PD50 calculated from the SN titre was slightly below that for the intradermal infection, in the remaining 12% it was somewhat above. The possibility of using the minimum titre determination for testing a vaccine and the significance of this titre as an expression of protection by vaccination are discussed.     

Assessment using ELISA of the herd immunity levels induced in cattle by foot-and-mouth disease oil vaccines

The development of a liquid-phase blocking sandwich ELISA (LPBE) to measure antibodies (Ab) produced in cattle with the O, A and C foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) types of commercial vaccines used in Argentina is described. The test was specific: 99% of naïve cattle sera (n = 130) gave titres below log₁₀ = 1.2, and none had a titre above log₁₀ = 1.5. Comparative studies with serum neutralization test (SNT) using sera from cattle which received one or more vaccine doses is reported. The overall rank correlation coefficient (Spearman's , r_s) between SNT and LPBE were highly significant (r_s > 0.67, P < 0.0001) for all vaccine strains. LBPE Ab titres on sera collected 90 days post vaccination were compared with results of cattle protection tests by applying a logistic regression. The minimum Ab titres at which 85% and 75% of the cattle were protected for each FMDV type were determined in order to interpret field Ab data in terms of protection. Application of this method allows large scale serological examinations to monitor antibody levels in vaccinated animals as an indirect indicator of the FMD control program status in the field. Its use in the evaluation of commercial batches of FMD vaccine is discussed.     

Cedivac-FMD can be used according to a marker vaccine principle

In this study, we investigated whether Cedivac-FMD, an emergency vaccine against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), is suitable for use conjointly with a screening program intended to confirm freedom from disease in vaccinated herds based on evidence of virus replication in vaccinates. Different sets of sera were tested using the Ceditest FMDV-NS ELISA for the detection of antibodies against non-structural proteins (NSPs) of FMD virus. During a vaccine safety study, serum samples were collected from 10 calves, 10 lambs and 10 piglets following administration of a double dose and a repeat dose of high payload trivalent Cedivac-FMD vaccine. All serum samples collected both 2 weeks following the administration of a double dose as well as those collected 2 weeks after the single dose booster (given 2 weeks after the double dose) were negative in the Ceditest FMDV-NS ELISA. In a series of vaccine potency experiments, serum samples were collected from 70 vaccinated cattle prior to and following exposure to infectious, homologous FMD virus. When testing cattle sera collected 4 weeks after vaccination with a regular dose of monovalent >6 PD(50) vaccines, 1 of 70 animals tested positive in the NSP antibody ELISA. After infection with FMD virus, antibodies to NSP were detected in 59 of 70 vaccinated cattle and 27 of 28 non-vaccinated control animals within 7 days. Cedivac-FMD vaccines do not induce NSP antibodies in cattle, pigs or sheep following administration of a double dose or a repeat dose. FMD-exposed animals can be detected in a vaccinated group within 7-14 days. Because Cedivac-FMD does not induce NSP antibodies, the principle of 'marker vaccine' applies.     

Seasonal variations in the formation of virus-neutralizing antibodies in cattle after vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease

The GDR in 1977 had been the first country to introduce a laboratory method for potency testing of FMD vaccines on the basis of secured correlations between titres of virus-neutralising serum antibodies of immunised cattle, on the one hand, and their probit-transformed protection against FMD, on the other. This is now the only state-registered method for potency testing. The method has ever since worked well all over the place. An evaluation of results obtained between 1982 and 1988 revealed seasonal variations of anti-FMD immunogenesis in cattle. FMD immunisations from February to July proved more effective than those performed in the rest of the year, in that higher antibody titres were built up within 14 days from vaccination. These results were confirmed by rates of protection of cattle recorded from direct potency testing of immunised animals, between 1969 and 1977.     

Improvement of the immune response to foot and mouth disease virus vaccine in calves by using Avridine as adjuvant.

The epidemiological analysis of the cattle population during the eradication plan of foot and mouth disease (FMD) in Argentina clearly indicated a higher incidence of the disease in animals within their first year of age. It is important to improve the efficacy of the vaccination in those animals. In a previous report, we have shown the effect of an immunomodulator, Avridine (Avr), in the enhancement of the immune response elicited by FMD virus (FMDV) vaccines in experimental hosts [Berinstein, A., Pérez Filgueira, M., Schudel, A., Zamorano, P., Borca, M., Sadir, A.M., 1993. Avridine and LPS from Brucella ovis: effect on the memory induced by foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccination in mice. Vaccine 11, 1295-1301]. In this report, we analyze the effect of Avr in the improvement of the anti-FMDV immune response elicited in young animals immunized with a tetravalent vaccine. The anti-FMDV antibody response was evaluated using a liquid-phase blocking sandwich ELISA (LPBE) [Smitsaart, E.N., Zanelli, M., Rivera, I., Fondevila, N., Compaired, D., Maradei, E., Bianchi, T., O'Donnell, V., Schudel, A.A., 1998. Assessment using ELISA of the herd immunity levels induced in cattle by foot and mouth disease oil vaccines. Prev. Vet. Med 33, 283-296] while the cellular response was detected using an antigen specific lymphoproliferative test [Zamorano, P., Wigdorovitz, A., Chaher, M., Fernández, F., Sadir, A., Borca, M., 1994. Localization of B and T cell epitopes on a synthetic peptide containing the major immunogenic site of FMDV O1 Campos. Virology 201, 383-387]. The results show that, while no differences were detected in the cellular response, the anti-FMDV antibody reaction was significantly (<0.05) higher in animals immunized with the immunogen containing Avr. At 90 days post vaccination, 89-100% of the animals immunized with Avr presented predicted protection (PP) higher than 82% while just 50-61% of the animals immunized with vaccine without immunomodulator presented that characteristic. Also, it is shown that the increase in the anti-FMDV antibody titre in animals immunized with the vaccine containing Avr was mediated by an increase in the levels of both IgG1 and IgG2 which presented a significative correlation with LPELISA antibodies titres. It is concluded that the addition of Avr in the FMDV vaccines improve the immune status of the calves, the cattle population that suffers the highest epidemiological risk.     

Presence of antibodies to non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus in repeatedly vaccinated cattle

For the purpose of removing infected animals by detecting humoral immune responses to non-structural proteins of the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus, antibodies induced by contaminated residual non-structural proteins contained in less pure FMD vaccine can be problematic for serological screening. The aim of the present study was to measure the possible presence of antibodies against these non-structural proteins in repeatedly vaccinated calves and beef cattle. Five imported FMD vaccines were examined using two commercial ELISA kits, UBI FMDV NS EIA and Ceditest FMDV-NS, for serological testing. After five doses of vaccination, the serum of one calf tested positive, and two vaccines induced a significant increase in anti-3ABC antibodies in calves. This finding demonstrated that a positive reaction to non-structural proteins due to impurities in the FMD vaccine was detectable using commercial tests. A low percentage of field sera sampled from beef cattle in Kinmen also tested positive, but the key factor resulting in the positive reactions could not be positively identified based on our data.     

豚鼠动物模型评价牛口蹄疫Asia-1型灭活疫苗效力的研究

以豚鼠为试验动物模型,探索一种应用豚鼠替代牛进行牛口蹄疫Asia-1型灭活疫苗效力检验的方法.豚鼠和牛同步对6批牛口蹄疫Asia-1型灭活疫苗进行PD50效力检验,其中2批进行重复性试验.豚鼠分别在免疫后7、14、21和28天采血检测Asia-1型的中和抗体水平.统计学分析显示,测定的豚鼠PD50和牛PD50之间具有极...     

Relationship between the anti-FMD virus antibody reaction as measured by different assays, and protection in vivo against challenge infection.

The antibody response of cattle after vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus was monitored using the serum neutralization test (SNT), the sandwich ELISA, liquid-phase ELISA, sandwich competition ELISA, liquid-phase competition ELISA, and the liquid-phase sandwich competition (blocking) ELISA. The competition ELISAs (in particular the "blocking" ELISA) were the most effective at detecting reactivity in these cattle sera. However, 95% of negative sera also competed in the most sensitive ELISA (the "blocking" ELISA) to titres of 1:32 (4% of the sera competed to a titre of 1:128). Comparisons between the different ELISAs, and between these ELISAs and the SNT, demonstrated that the tests were not measuring exactly the same reaction of antibody with FMD virus. With respect to the capacity of animals to resist FMD virus challenge, neither the SNT nor the competition ELISAs were consistently able to identify such animals. The anti-FMD virus antibody titres obtained could be classified into three zones; the "white zone" wherein antibody titres were high and donor animals likely to be protected; the "black zone" wherein antibody titres were low and donor animals likely to be susceptible to infection; the "grey zone" wherein the antibody titres were intermediary and no interpretation could be made with respect to protection. Assays such as ELISA and SNT cannot and do not measure immunological protection; they are a measure of antibody responses and nothing more, and should be interpreted in terms of the "three zone" phenomenon.     

Comparison of sensitivity and specificity in three commercial foot-and-mouth disease virus non-structural protein ELISA kits with swine sera in Taiwan

Three commercialized ELISA kits for the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins (NSPs) of FMD virus were compared, using sera from uninfected, vaccinated, challenged and naturally infected pigs. The kinetics of the antibody response to NSPs was compared on sequential serum samples in swine from challenge studies and outbreaks. The results showed that ELISA A (UBI) and ELISA B (CEDI) had better sensitivity than that of the 3ABC recombinant protein-based ELISA C (Chekit). The peak for detection of antibodies to NSPs in ELISA C was significantly delayed in sera from natural infection and challenged swine as compared to the ELISA A and B. The sensitivity of the three ELISAs gradually declined during the 6-month post-infection as antibodies to NSP decline. ELISA kits A and B detected NSP antibody in 50% of challenged pigs by the 9-10th-day and 7-8th-day post-challenge, respectively. ELISA B and C had better specificity than ELISA A on sequential serum samples obtained from swine immunized with a type O FMD vaccine commercially available in Taiwan. Antibody to NSPs before vaccination was not detected in swine not exposed to FMD virus, however, antibody to NSPs was found in sera of some pigs after vaccination. All assays had significantly lower specificity when testing sera from repeatedly vaccinated sows and finishers in 1997 that were tested after the 1997 FMD outbreak. However, when testing sera from repeatedly vaccinated sows or finishers in 2003-2004, the specificity for ELISAs A, B and C were significantly better than those in 1997. This effect was less marked for ELISA A. The ELISA B was the best test in terms of the highest sensitivity and specificity and the lowest reactivity with residual NSP in vaccinates.     

Dose-response evaluation of a genetically engineered foot-and-mouth disease virus polypeptide immunogen in cattle

Four groups of 9 cattle each were vaccinated with 10, 50, 250, or 1,250 micrograms of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus A12 VP1 fusion protein that was produced in Escherichia coli and emulsified in an oil adjuvant. The groups given the 10 and 50 micrograms of antigen were revaccinated at 15 weeks and were challenge exposed at 30 weeks; 5 of 9 and 7 of 9 cattle, respectively, were protected from FMD virus infection. The remaining 2 groups, vaccinated with 250 or 1,250 micrograms of antigen, were revaccinated at 32 weeks and were challenge exposed at 45 weeks; 8 of 9 and 9 of 9 cattle, respectively, were protected. The results indicated that the biosynthetic polypeptide FMD vaccine was effective using vaccination intervals frequently followed with conventional whole-virus vaccines.     

A serological survey for antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in domestic pigs during outbreaks in Kenya

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is endemic in Kenya and has been well studied in cattle, but not in pigs, yet the role of pigs is recognised in FMD-free areas. This study investigated the presence of antibodies against FMD virus (FMDV) in pigs sampled during a countrywide random survey for FMD in cattle coinciding with SAT 1 FMDV outbreaks in cattle. A total of 191 serum samples were collected from clinically healthy pigs in 17 districts. Forty-two of the 191 sera were from pigs vaccinated against serotypes O/A/SAT 2 FMDV. Antibodies against FMDV non-structural proteins were found in sera from 30 vaccinated and 71 non-vaccinated pigs, altogether 101/191 sera (53 %), and 91 % of these (92/101) also had antibodies measurable by serotype-specific ELISAs, predominantly directed against SAT 1 with titres of 10–320. However, only five high titres against SAT 1 in vaccinated pigs were confirmed by virus neutralisation test (VNT). Due to high degree of agreement between the two ELISAs, it was concluded that positive pigs had been infected with FMDV. Implications of these results for the role of pigs in the epidemiology of FMD in Kenya are discussed, and in-depth studies are recommended.     

Measurement of antibody in serum and genital fluids of bulls by ELISA after vaccination and challenge with Tritrichomonas foetus

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for detecting antibody to Tritrichomonas foetus using both whole cell antigen (WCA) and membrane protein antigen (MPA). The test was used to detect specific antibody in serum, preputial washings and seminal plasma samples from 7 adult bulls which were vaccinated subcutaneously on 3 occasions with a membrane protein vaccine against T. foetus var brisbane in an oil adjuvant, and from 4 unvaccinated control animals. One month after administration of the third dose of vaccine, vaccinated and control bulls were repeatedly challenged with the live vaccine strain of the T. foetus. A steady increase in serum antibody titre was detected after each inoculation of vaccine when both antigens were used in the ELISA. However, MPA was more sensitive. After challenge, vaccinated bulls developed an increased titre. No specific antibody was detected in control bulls, except in one bull after challenge in which seroconversion was detected. The serum antibody titres of both groups of animals were also measured with the microagglutination test which proved less sensitive than the ELISA. Antibody titres to both antigens, although lower than in serum, were detected in the seminal plasma of vaccinated animals. The control bulls remained non-responsive. No antibody was detected by ELISA in preputial washings from either control or vaccinated bulls prior to challenge. Post-challenge, some of the vaccinated bulls were responsive with both antigens whereas the control bulls remained negative.     

Clinical protection, sub-clinical infection and persistence following vaccination with extinction payloads of O1 Manisa Foot-and-Mouth Disease monovalent vaccine and challenge in goats and comparison with sheep

Small ruminants play an important role in the epidemiology of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD). Small ruminants are vaccinated with one-half or one-third of cattle dose of oil-based or aqueous vaccines respectively. The extinction antigen payload in vaccine for protection in small ruminants is poorly studied. FMD seronegative Nellore sheep (n=30) and Osmanabadi goats (n=30) were vaccinated with different payloads of O(1) Manisa vaccine (0.45-5 μg). Vaccinated and sero-negative unvaccinated sheep (n=6) and goats (n=6) were challenged intradermally into the coronary band with O(1) Manisa virus. The sheep and goats were monitored for signs of FMD and samples were collected for measuring viraemia and virus associated with nasal swabs and probang samples. Clotted blood was collected for serology. Vaccines containing antigen payload up to 0.94 μg protected sheep and goats against challenge. Sheep and goats vaccinated with 0.45 μg antigen payload were poorly protected against challenge. An antigen payload of 0.94 μg was sufficient to offer complete protection and also absence of carrier status. Sheep and goats with no vaccination or with poor sero conversion to vaccination showed sub-clinical infection and became carriers. The results of the study suggest that vaccination offers protection from clinical disease even at a low payload of 0.94 μg and hence one-half of cattle dose of the oil-based vaccine formulations is sufficient to induce protective immune response in sheep and goats. Since no live virus could be isolated after 5 days post challenge from the nasal swab or probang samples even though viral RNA was detected, the risk of these animals transmitting disease was probably very low.     

Endurance of immunity against foot-and-mouth disease in cattle after three consecutive annual vaccinations

Protection against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and ability to transmit FMD virus to susceptible contact animals were studied in cattle vaccinated three times in annual field campaigns with the Dutch trivalent vaccine. Eighty vaccinated cattle and 16 susceptible controls were intranasally exposed to an aerosol containing a homologous FMD challenge virus (O1 BFS, A10 Holland or C1 Detmold) or a heterologous virus (A5 Modena or C1 Modena). The day after exposure, vaccinated cattle were stabled individually with an FMD-susceptible contact. All cattle challenged with an homologous virus strain at one year (20 head), at two years (10 head) and at three years (30 head) after the last vaccination were protected against the development of clinical signs of disease; one, zero and five cattle of these groups, respectively, transmitted virus to their contacts. In each group, approximately two out of three exposed cattle had virus-positive oropharyngeal fluid samples and seroconverted. The amount of virus recovered from probang samples increased with the time since the last vaccination. Mean antibody titres of cattle that had not been vaccinated for three consecutive years did not change significantly over the last two-year period. All 10 cattle challenged with the vaccine strain-related C1 Modena virus were protected against clinical disease, whereas three out of 10 challenged with the heterologous A5 Modena strain virus one year after the last vaccination contracted FMD and transmitted the virus. Five others (four in the C1 group and one in the A5 group) spread the virus to their contacts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evaluation of different adjuvants for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine containing all the SAT serotypes

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an economically important disease of cloven-hoofed animals that is primarily controlled by vaccination of susceptible animals and movement restrictions for animals and animal-derived products in South Africa. Vaccination using aluminium hydroxide gel-saponin (AS) adjuvanted vaccines containing the South African Territories (SAT) serotypes has been shown to be effective both in ensuring that disease does not spread from the endemic to the free zone and in controlling outbreaks in the free zone. Various vaccine formulations containing antigens derived from the SAT serotypes were tested in cattle that were challenged 1 year later. Both the AS and ISA 206B vaccines adjuvanted with saponin protected cattle against virulent virus challenge. The oil-based ISA 206B-adjuvanted vaccine with and without stimulators was evaluated in a field trial and both elicited antibody responses that lasted for 1 year. Furthermore, the ISA 206 adjuvanted FMD vaccine protected groups of cattle against homologous virus challenge at very low payloads, while pigs vaccinated with an emergency ISA 206B-based FMD vaccine containing the SAT 1 vaccine strains were protected against the heterologous SAT 1 outbreak strain.     

Safety, efficacy and cross-protectivity of a live intranasal aerosol haemorrhagic septicaemia vaccine

The safety, efficacy and cross-protectivity of a live intranasal aerosol haemorrhagic septicaemia vaccine containing Pasteurella multocida serotype B:3,4 were tested in young cattle and buffaloes in Myanmar, where more than 1.5 million animals had been inoculated with this vaccine between 1989 and 1999. A recommended dose of 2 x 10(7) viable organisms was used for the efficacy test. The administration of 100 times the recommended dose to 50 cattle and 39 buffalo calves was innocuous. Seven months after they were vaccinated, three of three buffaloes were protected and 12 months after they were vaccinated, three of four buffaloes were protected against a subcutaneous challenge with serotype B:2 which killed three of three unvaccinated buffaloes. Twelve months after they were vaccinated, eight of eight cattle survived a serotype B:2 challenge, which killed four of four unvaccinated controls. The vaccinated cattle had developed serum antibodies detectable by the passive mouse protection test. Indirect haemagglutination tests on sera taken from cattle 10 days and five weeks after they were vaccinated showed high titres of antibodies. The serum of vaccinated cattle cross-protected passively immunised mice against infection with P. multocida serotypes E:2, F:3,4 and A:3,4.     

A Bayesian evaluation of six diagnostic tests for foot-and-mouth disease for vaccinated and non-vaccinated cattle

The sensitivity and specificity of six ELISA tests for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) to discriminate between sero-converted (for non-structural FMD virus proteins) and non-sero-converted cattle were evaluated for vaccinated and unvaccinated cattle. Since none of the tests could be considered as a proper reference test and for about half of the tested sera the true status (sero-converted or not for non-structural proteins, i.e. presence of antibodies) of the animals was unknown, a Bayesian analysis employing a latent class model was used that did not rely on the use of a reference test or gold standard. Prior information about prevalence for subsets of the data and specificity of the tests was incorporated into the analysis. The specificity of the six tests for vaccinated and non-vaccinated cattle ranged from 96 to 99%. For vaccinated cattle, one test stood out with an estimated sensitivity of 94% (95% CI from 89.8 to 98.1%). Second best for vaccinated cattle were two tests with estimated sensitivities of 85% (95% CI from 78.9 to 89.7%) and 92% (95% CI from 86.2 to 95.6%). For non-vaccinated cattle, the sensitivities of these three tests were around 97%. The remaining three tests showed lower estimated sensitivity for vaccinated cattle, ranging from 57 to 79%.     

The influence of maternal antibody and age of calves on effective vaccination against Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo

Twelve seronegative cows were vaccinated with an experimental bivalent Leptospira interrogans serovars hardjo and pomona vaccine late in their first pregnancy. Calves born of these dams were divided into 4 equal groups that received this vaccine at 4, 6, 10 and 18 weeks of age, respectively. Before vaccination the group geometric mean titres of maternally-derived circulating antibodies ranged from 2 to 25 for the microscopic agglutination (MA) test and 3 to 35 for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a serovar hardjo outer envelope antigen. Post-vaccination peak titres were 645 to 1612 for MA and 562 to 1037 for ELISA, respectively. Calves vaccinated at the youngest age, had the highest pre-vaccination circulating maternal antibody titres, but showed the smallest rise in post-vaccination antibody titres. Circulating maternal antibody was detected in calves up to 13 weeks of age. All immunised calves were protected against a virulent challenge with serovar hardjo type Hardjobovis, regardless of their age or maternally-derived antibody titres. These findings indicate that calves as young as 4 weeks old, vaccinated in the presence of maternally-derived antibody, can be fully protected against homologous virulent challenge.     

Foot-and-mouth disease. Challenge of cattle after multiple vaccinations

Four groups of six cattle were vaccinated from two to five times at 6 month intervals with two different trivalent FMD vaccines licensed in the given year. The FMDV type A strains in the vaccines designated A5F and A5B were closely related. Three months after the last vaccination the cattle were challenged by contact with animals inoculated with the original field strain A5B. The inoculated animals developed typical FMD symptoms with vesicles in the mouth and on the feet. Those cattle which had received vaccines that did not contain strain A5B also became severely sick, even after five vaccinations. Animals vaccinated twice with type B containing vaccine were also not completely protected. A safe protection can obviously only be achieved for fairly short periods of time if vaccine and challenge strain are homologous. It is proposed to change the rules of licensing, to speed up the procedure to vaccinate in cases of outbreaks. The need for further research, especially into improving vaccines, is stressed.