In situ use of groundwater by alfalfa

Disposal of saline drainage water is a significant problem for irrigated agriculture. One proposal is to recycle drainage water to irrigate salt tolerant crops until the volume has been reduced sufficiently to enable final disposal by evaporation. Part of this concept requires in situ crop water reuse from shallow groundwater; and data is needed to quantify the potential use of groundwater by alternative crops. A column lysimeter study was initiated to determine the potential crop water use from shallow groundwater by alfalfa as a function of groundwater quality and depth to groundwater. The results demonstrated that up to 50% of the crop water use could be met from shallow groundwater (<1.2 m) with an electrical conductivity less than 4 dS/m, and that the potential crop water use from deeper groundwater (2 m) increased over the years. The columns with high salinity (>4 dS/m) in the shallow groundwater experienced increased salinity in the soil profile with time, which resulted in reduced crop water use from shallow groundwater. Yields decreased with time as the groundwater salinity increased and periodic leaching will be required for in situ use to be a sustainable practice. Statistical analysis of crop yield demonstrated that there was significant use of groundwater with an EC of 6 dS/m for a few years.     

The effect of salinity on water productivity of wheat under deficit irrigation above shallow groundwater

Saline groundwater is often found at shallow depth in irrigated areas of arid and semi-arid regions and is associated with problems of soil salinisation and land degradation. The conventional solution is to maintain a deeper water-table through provision of engineered drainage disposal systems, but the sustainability of such systems is disputed. This shallow groundwater should, however, be seen as a valuable resource, which can be utilised via capillary rise (i.e. sub-irrigation). In this way, it is possible to meet part of the crop water requirement, even where the groundwater is saline, thus decreasing the need for irrigation water and simultaneously alleviating the problem of disposing of saline drainage effluent. Management of conditions within the root zone can be achieved by means of a controlled drainage system.A series of lysimeter experiments have permitted a detailed investigation of capillary upward flow from a water-table controlled at shallow depth (1.0 m) under conditions of moderately high (5 mm/day) evaporative demand and with different levels of salinity. Experiments were conducted on a wheat crop grown in a sandy loam soil. Groundwater salinity was held at values from 2 to 8 dS/m while supplementary (deficit) irrigation was applied at the surface with salinity in the range 1-4 dS/m.Our experiments show that increased salinity decreased total water uptake by the crop, but in most treatments wheat still extracted 40% of its requirement from the groundwater, similar to the proportion reported for non-saline conditions. Yield depression was limited to 30% of maximum when the irrigation water was of relatively good quality (1 and 2 dS/m) even with saline groundwater (up to 6 dS/m). Crop water productivity (grain yield basis) was around 0.35 kg/m³ over a wide range of salinity conditions when calculated conventionally on the basis of total water use, but was generally above 1.0 kg/m³ if calculated on the basis of irrigation input only.     

Simulations on direct and cyclic use of saline waters for sustaining cotton–wheat in a semi-arid area of north-west India

A validated agro-hydrological model soil water atmosphere plant (SWAP) was applied to formulate guidelines for irrigation planning in cotton–wheat crop rotation using saline ground water as such and in alternation with canal water for sustainable crop production. Six ground water qualities (4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 dS/m), four irrigation schedules with different irrigation depths (4, 6, 8 and 10  cm) and two soil types (sandy loam and loamy sand) were considered for each simulation. The impact of the each irrigation scenario on crop performance, and salinization/desalinisation processes occurring in the soil profile (0–2 m) was evaluated through Water Management Response Indicators (WMRIs). The criterion adopted for sustainable crop production was a minimum of pre-specified values of ET_rel (≥0.75 and ≥0.65 for wheat and cotton, respectively) at the end of the 5th year of simulation corresponding to minimum deep percolation loss of applied water. The extended simulation study revealed that it was possible to use the saline water upto 14 dS/m alternatively with canal water for cotton–wheat rotation in both sandy loam and loamy sand soils. In all situations pre-sown irrigation must be accomplished with canal water (0.3–0.4 dS/m). Also when the quality of ground water deteriorates beyond 10 dS/m, it was suggested to use groundwater for post-sown irrigations alternately with canal water. Generally, percolation losses increased with the increase in level of salinity of ground water to account for leaching and thus maintain a favourable salt balance in the root zone to achieve pre-specified values of ET_rel.     

Uptake of shallow groundwater by cotton: growth stage,groundwater salinity effects in column lysimeters

A 3-year column lysimeter experiment was conducted with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to determine the influence of shallow groundwater salinity on groundwater uptake. Nonsaline (0.3 dS m⁻¹) irrigation water was applied at 7-day intervals throughout the growing season, with the cotton allowed to use stored soil water and groundwater as root water uptake permitted. Groundwater salinities ranging from 0.3 dS m⁻¹ electrical conductivity (EC_w) to 30.8 dS m⁻¹ were evaluated. Water for leaching was applied following harvest each year in amounts adequate to produce a nonsaline soil profile at the beginning of each year. Equations were developed to describe relationships between day of year, growth stage or growing degree days and shallow groundwater uptake. Groundwater contributed about 30 to 42% of seasonal total evapotranspiration (ET) in treatments with groundwater salinity ≤ 20 dS m⁻¹ but declined to 12 to 19% of total ET at higher salinity levels.     

Drip irrigation with saline water for oleic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

The field experiments were carried out in 2007 and 2008 to study the effects and strategies of drip irrigation with saline water for oleic sunflower. Five treatments of irrigation water with average salinity levels of 1.6, 3.9, 6.3, 8.6, and 10.9 dS/m were designed. For each treatment, 7 mm water was applied when the soil matric potential (SMP) 0.2 m directly underneath the drip emitters was below −20 kPa, except during the seedling stage. To ensure the seedling survival, 28 mm water was applied after sowing during the seedling stage. Results indicate that amount of applied water decreases as salinity level of irrigation water increases. The emergence will be delayed when the salinity level of irrigation water is higher than 6.3 dS/m, but these differences will be alleviated if there is rainfall during emergence period. The final emergence percentage is not changed when salinity level of irrigation is less than 6.3 dS/m, and the percentage decreases by 2.0% for every 1 dS/m increase when the salinity level of irrigation water is above 6.3 dS/m, but the decreasing rate will be reduced if there is rainfall. The plant height and yield decrease with the increase of salinity of irrigation water. The height of plants decreases by 0.6-1.0% for every 1 dS/m increase in salinity level of irrigation water. The yield decreases by 1.8% for every 1 dS/m increase in salinity level of irrigation water, and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) increases with increase in salinity of irrigation water. The soil salinity increases as the salinity of irrigation water increasing after drip irrigation with saline water in the beginning, but the soil salinity in soil profile from 0 to 120 cm depths can be maintained in a stable level in subsequent year irrigation with saline water. From the view points of yield and soil salt balance, it can be recognized even as the salinity level of irrigation water is as high as 10.9 dS/m, saline water can be applied to irrigate oleic sunflower using drip irrigation when the soil matric potential 0.2 m directly under drip emitter is kept above −20 kPa and the beds are mulched in semi-humid area.     

A model for conjunctive use of groundwater and surface waters for control of irrigation salinity

Changes in the hydrologic balance in many irrigation areas, including those in the Murray Basin, Australia, have resulted in high watertables and salinity problems. However, where suitable aquifers exist, groundwater pumping and subsequent irrigation application after mixing with surface waters (referred to as conjunctive water use) can control salinity and watertable depth and improve productivity of degraded land. In order to assess where conjunctive water use will successfully control salinity, it is necessary to estimate the effects of pumped groundwater salinity on rootzone salinity. A simple steady rate model is derived for this purpose from mass conservation of salt and water. The model enables an estimate to be made of rootzone salinity for any particular salinity level of the groundwater being used in conjunction with surface water; this enables calculation of the required crop salt tolerance to prevent yield reductions. The most important input parameters for the model are groundwater salinity, the annual depth of class A pan evaporation, the annual depth of rainfall, the salinity of irrigation water, and a leaching parameter. For model parameters nominated in this paper, where groundwater salinity reaches 5 dS/m a crop threshold salt tolerance greater than 1.6 dS/m is required to avoid yield reductions. Where groundwater salinity approaches 10 dS/m, a crop threshold tolerance of 3 dS/m is required. Whilst the model derived indicates that rootzone salinity is sensitive to groundwater salinity, rootzone salinity is insensitive to leaching for leaching fractions commonly encountered (0.1 to 0.4). The insensitivity to leaching means that it could be expected that similar yields could be attained on heavy or light textured soils. This insensitivity also implies that there is no yield penalty from increasing the mass of pumped salt by pumping to achieve maximum watertable control in addition to leaching. The model developed is also used to estimate yield reductions expected under conjunctive use, for any particular levels of groundwater salinity and crop salt tolerance.     

The contribution of shallow groundwater by safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under high water table conditions, with and without supplementary irrigation

Lysimetric experiments were conducted to determine the contribution made by groundwater to the overall water requirements of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). The plants were grown in 24 columns, each having a diameter of 0.40 m and packed with silty clay soil. The four replicate randomized complete block factorial experiments were carried out using different treatment combinations. Six treatments were applied during each experiment by maintaining groundwater, with an EC of 1 dS m^?1, at three different water table levels (0.6, 0.8 and 1.10 m) with and without supplementary irrigation. The uptake of groundwater as a part of crop evapotranspiration was measured by taking daily readings of the water levels found in Mariotte tubes. The supplementary irrigation requirement for each treatment was applied by adding water (EC of 1 dS m^?1). The average percentage contribution from groundwater for the treatments (with and without supplementary irrigation under water table levels of 0.6, 0.8 and 1.10 m) were found to be 65, 59, 38% and 72, 70, 47% of the average annual safflower water requirement (6,466 m³ ha^?1). The increase in groundwater depths under supplementary irrigation treatments from 0.6 to 0.80 and 1.10 m caused seed and oil yield reductions of (7, 23.10%) and (48.23, 65.40%), respectively.     

A model of crop yield response to irrigation water salinity: theory,testing and application

A relationship between crop yield and irrigation water salinity is developed. The relationship can be used as a production function to quantify the economic ramifications of practices which increase irrigation water salinity, such as disposal of surface and sub-surface saline drainage waters into the irrigation water supply system. Guidelines for the acceptable level of irrigation water salinity in a region can then be established. The model can also be used to determine crop suitability for an irrigation region, if irrigation water salinity is high. Where experimental work is required to determine crop yield response to irrigation water salinity, the model can be used as a first estimate of the response function. The most appropriate experimental treatments can then be allocated. The model adequately predicted crop response to water salinity, when compared with experimental data.Abbreviations A Crop threshold rootzone salinity in Equation of Maas and Hoffman (dS/m) - B Fractional yield reduction per unit rootzone salinity increase (dS/m)^–1 - C_i Average salinity of applied water (dS/m) - C_r Average salinity of rainfall (dS/m) - C_s Linearly averaged soil solution salinity in the rootzone (dS/m) - C_se Linearly averaged soil saturation extract salinity in the rootzone (dS/m) - C_w Average salinity of irrigation supply water (dS/m) - C_z Soil solution salinity at the base of the crop rootzone (dS/m) - C Mean root water uptake weighted soil salinity in equation of Bernstein and François (1973) (dS/m) - E_p Depth of class A pan evaporation during the growing season (m) - ET_a Actual crop evapotranspiration during the growing season (m) - ET_m Maximum crop evapotranspiration during the growing season (m) - I The total depth of water applied during the growing season (including irrigation water and rainfall) (m) - K Empirical coefficient in leaching equation of Rhoades (1974) - K_c Crop coefficient for equation of Doorenbos and Pruit (1977) to estimate crop water use - K_y Yield response factor in equation of Doorenbos and Kassam (1974) - LF The leaching fraction - Ro Depth of rainfall runoff during the growing season (m) - R Depth of rainfall during the growing season (m) - W Depth of irrigation water applied during the growing season (m) - Y Relative crop yield - Y_a Actual crop yield (kg) - Y_m Maximum crop yield (kg) - /z Dimensionless depth for equation of Raats (1974), and empirical coefficient for the leaching equation of Hoffman and van Genutchen (1983)     

Trickle irrigation of cotton: Effect on soil chemical properties

The management of soil salinity and sodicity in the root zone (0–150 cm) of Panoche clay loam soil was studied during three consecutive growing seasons in a field experiment designed to determine the water requirement of Acala SJ-2 cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under trickle irrigation in the western San Joaquin Valley of California. The trickle irrigation treatments (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% of the previous day's pan evaporation, PE) were imposed on each of three preplant furrow irrigation depths of 0, 190 and 380 mm. The electrical conductivity, EC, of the irrigation water ranged from 0.4 to 0.5 dS m⁻¹ unless groundwater had to be mixed with the surface supply; this practice raised the EC to 0.6–0.9 dS m⁻¹ for short time periods. The unadjusted sodium adsorption ratio, SAR, of the irrigation water averaged < 4.Soil salinity, as measured by EC_e, was < 5 dS m⁻¹ and sodicity, as measured by SAR_e, was < 15 in the root zone. Changes in these soil chemical properties were more related to the amount of preplant irrigation at the lower (< 40% PE) trickle-irrigation levels than at the higher levels. Results suggest that soil salinity and sodicity can be maintained at acceptably low levels by appropriate preplant irrigation with consideration to amount of winter rainfall; even when during the season only sufficient trickle irrigation is given to meet crop water requirements without regards to leaching needs. The lint cotton yields over the 3-year period ranged from 357 to 1542 kg ha⁻¹; the corresponding applied water ranged from 175 to 744 mm.     

Drip irrigation of cotton with saline-sodic water

Summary A two-year study was conducted in the Negev region of Israel, using the drip method, to determine the effect of four levels of water quality (EC =1.0, 3.2, 5.4 and 7.3 dS/m) in combination with three soil amendment treatments (gypsum spread on the soil surface along the drip laterals after planting, injection of H₂SO₄ into the water during each irrigation, and a control) on plant response, salt distribution in the soil profile, and soil sodification processes. Salinity did not reduce yields even at the highest level, in spite of sodium and chloride accumulation. The highest seed cotton yield (6.4 t/ha) was obtained with the local well water (EC =3.2 dS/m), indicating an optimal response to salinity. The addition of soil amendments during the irrigation season, although reducing exchangeable sodium accumulation near the emitter, endangers the next crop by increasing sodium accumulation under the plant row. It is therefore, recommended that the amendment be applied only before the winter.Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, Israel. No. 1131-E, 1984 series     

Conjunctive use of saline and non-saline irrigation waters in semi-arid regions

In arid and semi-arid regions, effluent from sub-surface drainage systems is often saline and during the dry season its disposal poses an environmental problem. A field experiment was conducted from 1989 to 1992 using saline drainage water (EC=10.5–15.0 dS/m) together with fresh canal water (EC=0.4 dS/m) for irrigation during the dry winter season. The aim was to find if crop production would still be feasible and soil salinity would not be increased unacceptably by this practice. The experimental crops were a winter crop, wheat, and pearl-millet and sorghum, the rainy season crops, grown on a sandy loam soil. All crops were given a pre-plant irrigation with fresh canal water. Subsequently, the wheat crop was irrigated four times with different sequences of saline drainage water and canal water. The rainy season crops received no further irrigation as they were rainfed. Taking the wheat yield obtained with fresh canal water as the potential value (100%), the mean relative yield of wheat irrigated with only saline drainage water was 74%. Substitution of canal water at first post-plant irrigation and applying thereafter only saline drainage water, increased the yield to 84%. Cyclic irrigations with canal and drainage water in different treatments resulted in yields of 88% to 94% of the potential. Pearl-millet and sorghum yields decreased significantly where 3 or 4 post-plant irrigations were applied with saline drainage water to previous wheat crop, but cyclic irrigations did not cause yield reduction. The high salinity and sodicity of the drainage water increased the soil salinity and sodicity in the soil profile during the winter season, but these hazards were eliminated by the sub-surface drainage system during the ensuing monsoon periods. The results obtained provide a promising option for the use of poor quality drainage water in conjunction with fresh canal water without undue yield reduction and soil degradation. This will save the scarce canal water, reduce the drainage water disposal needs and associated environmental problems.     

Effect of initial soil salinity and subirrigation water salinity on potato tuber yield and size

A field lysimeter study was conducted to investigate the effect of initial soil salinity and salinity level of brackish subirrigation water on tuber weight and tuber size of three potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars (Kennebec, Norland and Russet Burbank) under simulated arid conditions. Both saline and non-saline initial soil conditions were simulated in a total of 36 lysimeters. Eighteen lysimeters were flushed with fresh water (0.2 dS/m), while the remaining 18 lysimeters were flushed with brackish water (2 dS/m). For each soil condition, two subirrigation water concentrations, 1 and 9 dS/m, were used in nine lysimeters each. For each subirrigation water treatment, three potato cultivars were grown. In all lysimeters, water table was maintained at 0.4 m from the soil surface. Arid conditions were simulated by covering the lysimeter top with plastic mulch, allowing the potato shoots to grow through a cut in the mulch. The average root zone salinities (EC_w) were found to be 1.2 and 1.5 dS/m in non-saline lysimeters subirrigated with 1 and 9 dS/m waters, respectively. The corresponding salinities were 3.2 and 3.7 dS/m in the saline lysimeters. Across cultivars, there was no significant effect of either initial soil salinity or subirrigation water salinity on total tuber weight. However, the weight of Grade A tubers was higher in non-saline soil than in saline soil. Kennebec and Russet Burbank Grade A tuber weights were not affected by the initial soil salinity. On the contrary, a significant reduction in Grade A and total tuber weight under initially saline soil was evident for the Norland cultivar.     

Effects of drip irrigation with saline water on waxy maize (Zea mays L. var. ceratina Kulesh) in North China Plain

In order to study the effects of drip irrigation with saline water on waxy maize, three years of field experiments were carried out in 2007-2009 in North China Plain. Five treatments with average salinity of irrigation water, 1.7, 4.0, 6.3, 8.6, and 10.9 dS/m were designed. Results indicated that the irrigation water with salinity <10.9 dS/m did not affect the emergence of waxy maize. As salinity of irrigation water increased, seedling biomass decreased, and the plant height, fresh and dry weight of waxy maize in the thinning time decreased by 2% for every 1 dS/m increase in salinity of irrigated water. The decreasing rate of the fresh ear yield for every 1 dS/m increase in salinity of irrigation water was about 0.4-3.3%. Irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) increased with the increase in salinity of irrigation water when salinity was <10.9 dS/m. Precipitation during the growing period significantly lightened the negative impacts of irrigation-water salinity on the growth and yield. Soil salinity in depth of 0-120 cm increased in the beginning of irrigation with saline water, while it was relatively stable in the subsequent year when salinity of irrigation water was not higher than 4.0 dS/m and the soil matric potential (SMP) at 0.2 m directly underneath the drip emitter was controlled above −20 kPa.     

Effect of saline irrigation on germination and growth parameters of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in a pot experiment

The effect of saline irrigation was investigated on germination and growth parameters of six barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in a pot experiment. The crop germination decreased between 24–35% with irrigation water having EC of 9.26 dS m⁻¹, 28–47% with water EC of 13.4 dS m⁻¹ and 30–53% with water EC of 16.28 dS m⁻¹ among various cultivars. The sequence of reduction in germination was Hassawi > Gusto > Madini > M. Khariji > Qassimi. Plant height and total number of plant tillers decreased significantly with increasing irrigation-water salinity. Plant height ranged between 39.43 cm (Qassimi cultivar) with water EC of 3.00 dS m⁻¹ to 1.97 cm (Gusto) with water EC of 16.28 dS m⁻¹ whereas the range for total number of plant tillers per pot was 77.00 (Qassimi) with irrigation EC of 3.00 dS m⁻¹ to 9.67 (Gusto) with irrigation EC of 16.28 dS m⁻¹. The trend of reduction in plant height for different cultivars was Gusto > Qassimi > Hassawi > Madini > M. Khariji whereas for plant tillers, the sequence was Gusto < Hassawi < M. Khariji < Qassimi < Madini. Greenmatter and drymatter yield decreased significantly with increasing irrigation water salinity. The greenmatter yield ranged between 138.67 g per pot (Madini) with water EC of 3.00 dS m⁻¹ to 11.40 g per pot (Gusto) with water EC of 16.28 dS m⁻¹. A similar trend was found for drymatter yield. The trend of reduction in yield among various cultivars (both greenmatter and drymatter) was Gusto > Hassawi > M. Khariji > Qassimi > Madini. Overall sequence of salt tolerance for different barley cultivars was Madini > Qassimi > M. Khariji > Hassawi > Gusto. A comparison of cultivars indicated that irrigation waters with EC 13.40 dS m⁻¹ and above reduced crop germination and greenmatter production to a significant level. In conclusion, there exists a lot of potential for a reasonable production of barley as forage crop with irrigation water having salinity up to 9.26 dS m⁻¹ provided 15% extra water above crop-water requirement is applied as leaching requirements to control soil salinity.     

Growth and water use of eucalypt trees irrigated with saline drainage water

Leaf chemical composition, growth and water use of Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Lake Albacutya provenance) were measured in the 4th year of a split-plot salinity by nutrition trial. The main plot consisted of irrigating with five different water salinities: 0.5 dS/m (S0.5), 2 dS/m (S2), 5 dS/m (S5), 7.5 dS/m (S7.5) and 10 dS/m (S10). The subplot treatments consisted either of annual additions of 200 kg N and 100 kg P per hectare (+ N + P) or no addition of nutrients (– N – P). Irrigation with water from a drainage system (treatments S2, S5, S7.5 and S10) added about a further 100 kg N/ha annually. Leaf concentrations of N and P were higher in the + N + P treatments. In S0.5, nutrient addition stimulated growth. In + N + P treatments, raising the irrigation salinity from 0.5 to 2.0 dS/m increased leaf Na and decreased the growth rate, however, further increases in salinity affected neither leaf Na nor growth. In – N – P, growth rate depression due to inadequate nutrition was overcome in S2 and S5 by the 100 kg/ha of N in the drainage water. At higher salinities, the N added by drainage water did not overcome the effect of inadequate nutrition. On days when the reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) was less than 3 mm/day, the correlations between water use of trees in litres per day and ETo and between water use of trees in litres per day and the basal area of the tree butt were highly significant. On days when the ETo was 3 mm/day or greater, the correlation between tree water use and basal area was highly significant, but that between tree water use and ETo was not significant. Received: 15 March 1996     

Irrigation with brackish water under desert conditions II. Physiological and yield response of maize (Zea mays) to continuous irrigation with brackish water and to alternating brackish-fresh-brackish water irrigation

The physiological behavior and yield response of maize under irrigation with saline water was studied in the laboratory and in the field. In the laboratory, the germination rate decreased only when the electrical conductivity (EC) of the substrate solution was above 17 dS/m. The osmotic potential of germinating maize seedlings decreased in proportion to the decrease in osmotic potential of the substrate.In the field, two maize cultivars (a field maize and a sweet maize) were irrigated alternately with saline (11 days from sowing), fresh (21 days from emergence), and saline (from day 33 to harvest) water and compared with maize irrigated with saline water continuously throughout the season. Four levels of irrigation water salinity were used (EC_i = 1.2, 4.5, 7.0 and 10.5 dS/m).In the field no osmotic adjustment by the leaf sheaths of plants in response to salinity was observed. The osmotic potential of corn leaf sheaths (π) decreased with ontogeny in all treatments. The midday leaf water potential (ψ_L) in maize irrigated with 10.5 dS/m water was 0.75 MPa lower than in plants irrigated with 1.2 dS/m water.In the continuous treatment grain yield was reduced significantly with each increase in salt concentration, and the relationship between relative yield (y) and EC_i could be expressed as y = 100?8.7 (EC_i-0.84). With alternating irrigation and 7.0 dS/m treatment the grain yield was the same as in the low EC treatment (6.98 kg/m²).     

Short term effects of saline irrigation on evapotranspiration from lysimeter-grown citrus trees

Eight-year-old Murcott orange trees grown in greenhouse lysimeters filled with sandy soil were subjected to irrigation with saline water to investigate the influence of salinity on daily evapotranspiration (ET). The study was conducted in Japan from 1 August to 15 September 2000. The study duration was divided into three periods of about 2 weeks each. In period I, all lysimeters planted with a tree were irrigated with 60 mm of non-saline water at the water content of 70% of field capacity (FC). Salinity treatments for period II started on 14 August. The treatments during period II were as follows: Lysimeter 1 (L1) had 32 mm non-saline water with an electrical conductivity (EC_I) of 1.0 dS/m applied. At the same time Lysimeter 2 (L2) had 32 mm of saline water with an EC_I of 8.6 dS/m applied when the water content decreased to 70% of FC. Lysimeter 3 (L3) had 16 mm saline water (EC_I=8.6 dS/m) applied at 85% of FC. The irrigation amounts during period II were equal to those corresponding to 1.2 times of water required to reach FC. Treatments in period III were the same as in period I.Daily ET was similar for all weighing lysimeters during period I. The average relative ET for L2 and L3 with respect to L1 (L2/L1 and L3/L1) were similar during this period, with a mean value of 0.99. During period II, ET from L1 was consistently higher than that from L2 and L3. In addition, L3 with a higher irrigation frequency because of irrigation at higher soil water content resulted in higher ET than L2. The average relative ET of period II was 0.71 and 0.88 for both L2 and L3. During the last half of period III, reductions occurred in the ET differences between the saline treatments (L2 and L3) and non-saline control (L1).Evaporation rates from soil did not exceed 0.7 mm per day. Transpiration rates from L1, L2 and L3 during period II varied between 6.3 and 3.1 mm per day, 4.5 and 2.2 mm per day, and 5.8 and 3.0 mm per day, respectively. The results reflected a tangible difference of water extraction by roots from individual soil layers. Maximum water uptake by these trees was observed at layer of 30–60 cm. Nevertheless, no clear differences in water extraction pattern between trees were observed.Approximately, 95% of drainage occurred during the first 2 days following irrigation. The electrical conductivity of soil water (EC_S) and the electrical conductivity of drainage water (EC_D) for the saline water treatments (L2 and L3), compared to the control (L1) were significantly different during period II. EC_S values were 2–5 times higher in saline treatments compared to the control treatment. After irrigating trees with saline water, EC_S increased from 5 to 14 and 16 dS/m in L2 and L3, respectively. Similarly, in both saline treatments, EC_D values were greatly increased after irrigation. During period III, EC_D values increased from 5 to 8 dS/m in L2, and from 3 to 11 dS/m in L3. By contrast, EC_S declined from 14 to 5 dS/m in L2, and from 16 to 3 dS/m in L3 over the same period.     

Yield and foliar injury responses of mature plum trees to salinity

Summary The salt tolerance of mature Santa Rosa plum trees was assessed on 20-year-old trees grown in the San Joaquin Valley of California. The experimental design consisted of six levels of irrigation water salinity (electrical conductivities of 0.3 to 8 dS/m) replicated five times with each replication consisting of ten trees. Salinity treatments imposed in March 1984 did not influence tree yields harvested in June 1984. In 1985, the second year of treatments, yield from the highest salt treatment (electrical conductivity of irrigation water, EC _i , of 8 dS/m) was reduced by half; the number of fruit harvested was reduced 40%, and fruit size was reduced significantly. Foliar damage was so severe by the end of 1985 that nonsaline water was applied to the two highest salt treatments (EC _i = 6 and 8 dS/m) in an attempt to restore tree vigor. In 1986 salt effects had become progressively worse on the continuing saline treatments. A linear piece-wise salt tolerance curve is presented for soil salinity values, expressed as the electrical conductivity of saturated extracts (EC _e ) integrated to a soil depth of 1.2 m over a 2-year period. The salt tolerance threshold for relative yield (Y _r ) based on 3 years of data was 2.6 dS/m and yield reduction at salinity levels beyond the threshold was 31% per dS/m (Y _ir=100 – 31 [EC _e – 2.6]j). Significant foliar damage occurred when leaf chloride concentrations surpassed 200 mmol/kg of leaf dry weight (0.7%). Sodium concentrations in the leaves remained below 10 mmol/kg (0.02%) until foliar damage became severe. This suggests that chloride was the dominant ion causing foliar damage.     

覆砂下微咸水盐度和SAR对水盐入渗及分布的影响

为探讨覆砂条件下灌溉水盐度及钠吸附比对土壤水分入渗过程及水盐分布的影响规律,通过室内土柱模拟试验,研究了灌溉水盐度(EC为0,1.0,2.5,5.0,7.5 dS/m,SAR为5.8(mmol/L)^0.5)和钠吸附比(SAR为 3.9,7.0,12.7,22.7(mmol/L)^0.5,EC为2.5 dS/m)对土壤累积湿润锋和入渗量以及水盐分布的影响.结果表明,随灌溉水盐度的增加,累积湿润锋呈增加趋势,而累积入渗量呈减少趋势.与去离子水相比,7.5 dS/m处理的累积湿润锋较蒸馏水增加了7.0%,而土壤平均含水率降低了36.0%.累积湿润锋和入渗量随灌溉水钠吸附比增加先增大后减小,土壤含水率受灌溉水钠吸附比的影响较小.土壤含盐量随灌溉水盐度增加而呈幂函数增加,但与钠吸附比无明显关系.灌溉水的钠吸附比提高了土壤pH值.     

On-farm water management in saline groundwater area under scarce canal water supply condition in the Northwest India

The study investigates the possibility of enhancing crop water productivity in the parts of Northwest India where groundwater quality is marginal and canal water supply is severely scarce. Soil, Water, Atmosphere and Plant (SWAP) model was calibrated and validated in three farmers’ fields with varying canal water availability and groundwater quality in the Kaithal Irrigation Circle of the Bhakra Canal system, Haryana. On the basis of predicted and observed soil water content, pressure heads, salt concentration at 2 week intervals and crop yields, the model was found suitable for use in the region. A few nomographs were prepared to provide a graphical method to predict the effect of different combinations of water quality and depth of water application on crop yield and soil salinity and to help develop some guidelines to the farming community. Water management alternatives at the field level were suggested to increase the yield and to maintain soil salinity below threshold level. The application of frequent irrigation in precisely leveled field would help in achieving 10% higher yield even when saline groundwater of 11 dS/m is used for irrigation.