Nitrous oxide emissions from two dairy pasture soils as affected by different rates of a fine particle suspension nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide

In grazed pasture systems, a major source of N₂O is nitrogen (N) returned to the soil in animal urine. We report in this paper the effectiveness of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), applied in a fine particle suspension (FPS) to reduce N₂O emissions from dairy cow urine patches in two different soils. The soils are Lismore stony silt loam (Udic Haplustept loamy skeletal) and Templeton fine sandy loam (Udic Haplustepts). The pasture on both soils was a mixture of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and white clover (Trifolium repens). Total N₂O emissions in the Lismore soil were 23.1–31.0 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ following the May (autumn) and August (late winter) urine applications, respectively, without DCD. These were reduced to 6.2–8.4 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ by the application of DCD FPS, equivalent to reductions of 65–73%. All three rates of DCD applied (7.5, 10 and 15 kg ha⁻¹) were effective in reducing N₂O emissions. In the Templeton soil, total N₂O emissions were reduced from 37.4 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ without DCD to 14.6–16.3 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ when DCD was applied either immediately or 10 days after the urine application. These reductions are similar to those in an earlier study where DCD was applied as a solution. Therefore, treating grazed pasture soils with an FPS of DCD is an effective technology to mitigate N₂O emissions from cow urine patch areas in grazed pasture soils.     

The use of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), to decrease nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions in a simulated grazed and irrigated grassland

Abstract. In grazed dairy pasture systems, a major source of NO₃^– leached and N₂O emitted is the N returned in the urine from the grazing animal. The objective of this study was to use lysimeters to measure directly the effectiveness of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), in decreasing NO₃^– leaching and N₂O emissions from urine patches in a grazed dairy pasture under irrigation. The soil was a free‐draining Lismore stony silt loam (Udic Haplustept loamy skeletal) and the pasture was a mixture of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and white clover (Trifolium repens). The use of DCD decreased NO₃^–‐N leaching by 76% for the urine N applied in the autumn, and by 42% for urine N applied in the spring, giving an annual average reduction of 59%. This would reduce the NO₃^–‐N leaching loss in a grazed paddock from 118 to 46 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1. The NO₃^–‐N concentration in the drainage water would be reduced accordingly from 19.7 to 7.7 mg N L^–1, with the latter being below the drinking water guideline of 11.3 mg N L^–1. Total N₂O emissions following two urine applications were reduced from 46 kg N₂O‐N ha^–1 without DCD to 8.5 kg N₂O‐N with DCD, representing an 82% reduction. In addition to the environmental benefits, the use of DCD also increased herbage production by more than 30%, from 11 to 15 t ha^–1 yr^–1. The use of DCD therefore has the potential to make dairy farming more environmentally sustainable by reducing NO₃^– leaching and N₂O emissions.     

Impact of urine and the application of the nitrification inhibitor DCD on microbial communities in dairy-grazed pasture soils

Tools to manage the emission of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N₂O), an intermediate of both nitrification and denitrification, from soils are limited. To date, the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) is one of the most effective tools available to livestock farmers for reducing N₂O emissions and minimizing leaching of nitrogen in response to increased urine deposition in grazed pasture systems. Despite its effectiveness in decreasing N losses from animal urine by inhibiting N processes in soils, the effect of DCD on the population structure of denitrifiers and overall bacterial community composition is still uncertain. Here we use three New Zealand dairy-grazed pasture soils to determine the effects of DCD application on microbial community richness and composition at both functional (genes involved in the denitrification process) and phylogenetic (overall bacterial community composition based on 16S rRNA profiling) levels. Results further confirm that the effects on microbial populations are minimal and transient in nature. The impact of DCD on microbial community structure was soil dependent, and a greater effect was attributed to intrinsic soil properties like soil texture, with community response to DCD in combination with urine being comparable to that under urine alone. Addition of DCD to cattle urine also reduced N₂O emission between 23 and 67%.     

Methanotroph abundance not affected by applications of animal urine and a nitrification inhibitor,dicyandiamide, in six grazed grassland soils

Purpose  

Methanotrophs are an important group of methane (CH₄)-oxidizing bacteria in the soil, which act as a major sink for the greenhouse gas, CH₄. In grazed grassland, one of the ecologically most sensitive areas is the animal urine patch soil, which is a major source of both nitrate (NO₃ ⁻) leaching and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions. Nitrification inhibitors, such as dicyandiamide (DCD), have been used to mitigate NO₃ ⁻ leaching and N₂O emissions in grazed pastures. However, it is not clear if the high nitrogen loading rate in the animal urine patch soil and the use of nitrification inhibitors would have an impact on the abundance of methanotrophs in grazed grassland soils. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of animal urine and DCD on methanotroph abundance in grazed grassland soils.     

Effects of trampling of a wet dairy pasture soil on soil porosity and on mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions by a nitrification inhibitor,dicyandiamide

Urine patches in dairy pastures are major sources of nitrous oxide (N₂O). Wet winters result in compaction damage to pastures because of animal trampling. The nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), is effective at reducing N₂O emissions from urine patches. Here, we assessed the extent of damage to the physical quality of the soil by trampling and whether this influenced the ability of DCD to mitigate N₂O emissions. A field experiment was conducted where a sandy loam soil was trampled by a mechanical hoof just before urine and DCD application. Trampling reduced air permeability and pore continuity, but this had no effect on bulk density. Urine appeared to have contributed to pore collapse and blockage. Trampling increased average cumulative N₂O emissions from 1.74 to 4.66% of urine‐N applied. This effect was attributed to increased water‐filled pore space, aggregate destruction and suppression of grass growth. DCD was highly effective in reducing N₂O emissions, with the N₂O emission factor of the urine‐N being decreased by 58–63%. Trampling did not significantly affect the effectiveness of DCD in reducing N₂O emissions.     

Effect of urease and nitrification inhibitors on N transformation, gaseous emissions of ammonia and nitrous oxide, pasture yield and N uptake in grazed pasture system

Nitrogen (N) losses via nitrate (NO₃⁻) leaching, ammonia (NH₃) volatilization and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from grazed pastures in New Zealand are one of the major contributors to environmental degradation. The use of N inhibitors (urease and nitrification inhibitors) may have a role in mitigating these N losses. A one-year field experiment was conducted on a permanent dairy-grazed pasture site at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand to quantify these N losses and to assess the effect of N inhibitors in reducing such losses during May 2005-2006. Cow urine at 600 kg N ha⁻¹ rate with or without urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (nBTPT) or (trade name “Agrotain”) (3 L ha⁻¹), nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) (7 kg ha⁻¹) and the use of double inhibitor (DI) containing a combination of both Agrotain and DCD (3:7) were applied to field plots in autumn, spring and summer. Pasture production, NH₃ and N₂O fluxes, soil mineral N concentrations, microbial biomass C and N, and soil pH were measured following the application of treatments during each season. All measured parameters, except soil microbial biomass C and N, were influenced by the added inhibitors during the three seasons. Agrotain reduced NH₃ emissions over urine alone by 29%, 93% and 31% in autumn, spring and summer respectively but had little effect on N₂O emission. DCD reduced N₂O emission over urine alone by 52%, 39% and 16% in autumn, spring and summer respectively but increased NH₃ emission by 56%, 9% and 17% over urine alone during those three seasons. The double inhibitor reduced NH₃ by 14%, 78% and 9% and N₂O emissions by 37%, 67% and 28% over urine alone in autumn, spring and summer respectively. The double inhibitor also increased pasture dry matter by 10%, 11% and 8% and N uptake by the 17%, 28% and 10% over urine alone during autumn, spring and summer respectively. Changes in soil mineral N and pH suggested a delay in urine-N hydrolysis with Agrotain, and reduced nitrification with DCD. The combination of Agrotain and DCD was more effective in reducing both NH₃ and N₂O emissions, improving pasture production, controlling urea hydrolysis and retaining N in NH₄⁺ form. These results suggest that the combination of both urease and nitrification inhibitors may have the most potential to reduce N losses if losses are associated with urine and improve pasture production in intensively grazed systems.     

Effect of 7-year application of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), on soil microbial biomass, protease and deaminase activities, and the abundance of bacteria and archaea in pasture soils

Purpose

The nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) has been shown to be highly effective in reducing nitrate (NO₃ ^?) leaching and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions when used to treat grazed pasture soils. However, there have been few studies on the possible effects of long-term DCD use on other soil enzyme activities or the abundance of the general soil microbial communities. The objective of this study was to determine possible effects of long-term DCD use on key soil enzyme activities involved in the nitrogen (N) cycle and the abundance of bacteria and archaea in grazed pasture soils.

Materials and methods

Three field sites used for this study had been treated with DCD for 7 years in field plot experiments. The three pasture soils from three different regions across New Zealand were Pukemutu silt loam in Southland in the southern South Island, Horotiu silt loam in the Waikato in the central North Island and Templeton silt loam in Canterbury in the central South Island. Control and DCD-treated plots were sampled to analyse soil pH, microbial biomass C and N, protease and deaminase activity, and the abundance of bacteria and archaea.

Results and discussion

The three soils varied significantly in the microbial biomass C (858 to 542 μg C g^?1 soil) and biomass N (63 to 28 μg N g^?1), protease (361 to 694 μg tyrosine g^?1 soil h^?1) and deaminase (4.3 to 5.6 μg NH₄ ⁺ g^?1 soil h^?1) activity, and bacteria (bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number: 1.64?×?10⁹ to 2.77?×?10⁹ g^?1 soil) and archaea (archaeal 16S rRNA gene copy number: 2.67?×?10⁷ to 3.01?×?10⁸ g^?1 soil) abundance. However, 7 years of DCD use did not significantly affect these microbial population abundance and enzymatic activities. Soil pH values were also not significantly affected by the long-term DCD use.

Conclusions

These results support the hypothesis that DCD is a specific enzyme inhibitor for ammonia oxidation and does not affect other non-target microbial and enzyme activities. The DCD nitrification inhibitor technology, therefore, appears to be an effective mitigation technology for nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions in grazed pasture soils with no adverse impacts on the abundance of bacteria and archaea and key enzyme activities.     

Inhibition of nitrification to mitigate nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions in grazed grassland: a review

Purpose

Climate change is arguably the biggest environmental challenge facing humanity today. Livestock production systems are a major source of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change. Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is a potent greenhouse gas with a long-term global warming potential 298 times that of carbon dioxide (CO₂). Nitrate (NO₃ ^?) leaching from soil causes water contamination, and this is a major environmental issue worldwide. Agriculture is identified as the dominant source for NO₃ ^? in surface and ground waters. In grazed grassland systems where animals graze outdoor pastures, most of the N₂O and NO₃ ^? are from nitrogen (N) returned to the soil in the excreta of the grazing animal, particularly the urine. This paper reviews published literature on the use of nitrification inhibitors (NI) to treat grazed pasture soils to mitigate NO₃ ^? leaching and N₂O emissions.

Materials and methods

This paper provides a review on: ammonia oxidisers, including ammonia oxidising bacteria (AOB) and ammonia oxidising archaea (AOA), that are responsible for ammonia oxidation in the urine patch areas of grazed pastures; the effectiveness of NIs, such as dicyandiamide (DCD) and 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP), in inhibiting the growth and activity of ammonia oxidisers; the efficacy of DCD and DMPP in reducing NO₃ ^? leaching and N₂O emissions in grazed pastures; additional benefits of using NI in grazed pasture, including increased pasture production, decreased cation leaching and decreased NO₃ ^? concentrations in plants; and major factors that may affect the efficacy of NIs.

Results and discussion

Research from a number of laboratory and field studies have conclusively demonstrated that treating grazed pasture soils with a NI, such as DCD, is an effective means of reducing NO₃ ^? leaching and N₂O emissions from grazed livestock production systems. Results show that N₂O emissions from animal urine-N can be reduced by an average of 57 % and NO₃ ^? leaching from animal urine patches can be reduced by 30 to 50 %. The NI technology has been shown to be effective under a wide range of soil and environmental conditions. The NI technology also provides other benefits, including increased pasture production, reduced cation (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺ and K⁺) leaching and reduced NO₃ ^? concentration in pasture plants which would reduce the risk of NO₃ ^? poisoning for the animal.

Conclusions

The use of NIs such as DCD to treat grazed pasture soil is a scientifically sound and practically viable technology that can effectively mitigate NO₃ ^? leaching and N₂O emissions in grazed livestock production systems.

     

How does the application of different nitrification inhibitors affect nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching from cow urine in grazed pastures?

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is a potent greenhouse gas, and nitrate () is a water contaminant. In grazed grassland, the major source of both leaching and N₂O emissions is nitrogen (N) deposited in animal excreta, particularly in the urine. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two nitrification inhibitors: (i) a solution of dicyandiamide (DCD) and (ii) a liquid formulation of 3,4‐dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) for reducing N₂O emissions and leaching from urine patch areas in two grazed pasture soils under different environmental conditions. In the Canterbury Templeton soil, the nitrification rate of ammonium from the animal urine applied at 1000 kg N/ha was significantly decreased by the application of DCD (10 kg/ha) and DMPP (5 kg/ha). N₂O emissions, measured over a 3‐month period, from dairy cow urine applied to the Canterbury Templeton soil were 1.14 kg N₂O‐N/ha, and this was reduced to 0.43 and 0.39 kg N₂O‐N/ha by DCD and the liquid DMPP, respectively. These are equivalent to 62–66% reductions in the total N₂O emissions. Nitrate leaching losses from dairy cow urine applied to the Waikato Horotiu soil lysimeters were reduced from 628.6 kg ‐N/ha to 400.6 and 451.5 kg ‐N/ha by the application of DCD (10 kg/ha) or DMPP (1 kg/ha), respectively. There was no significant difference between the DCD solution and the liquid DMPP in terms of their effectiveness in reducing N₂O emissions or leaching under the experimental conditions of this study. These results suggest that both the liquid formulations of DCD and DMPP have the potential to be used as nitrification inhibitors to reduce N₂O emissions and leaching in grazed pasture soils.     

Nitrous oxide emissions from animal urine as affected by season and a nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide

Purpose  

Nitrous oxide emissions from pasture soils account for one third of total agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand. The aim of this study was to determine nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from animal urine patches under summer (with irrigation) and winter conditions as affected by dicyandiamide (DCD) in grazed grassland in New Zealand.     

Effect of application rate of a nitrification inhibitor,dicyandiamide (DCD), on nitrification rate,and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea growth in a grazed pasture soil: An incubation study

Purpose

Dicyandiamide (DCD) has been used commercially in New Zealand to reduce nitrate leaching and N₂O emissions in grazed pastures. However, there is a lack of information in the literature on the optimum rate of DCD to achieve the environmental benefits while at the same time reducing the cost of the technology. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of DCD application rate on its effectiveness to inhibit ammonia oxidizer growth and nitrification rate in a grazed pasture soil.

Materials and methods

The soil was a Templeton silt loam (Immature Pallic Soil; Udic Haplustepts) collected from Lincoln University Research Dairy Farm with a mixed pasture consisting of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and was incubated alone (control) or with cow urine at 700 kg N/ha with 6 rates of DCD [0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 (applied twice), 15 and 20 kg/ha] in incubation vessels. The incubation vessels were placed randomly in an incubator with a constant temperature of 12 °C. During 112 days of incubation, soil subsamples were taken at different time intervals to measure the concentrations of NO₃ ^?-N and NH₄ ⁺-N and the amoA gene copy numbers of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA).

Results and discussion

DCD applied at all the different rates inhibited nitrification in urine-treated soils, but the effectiveness increased with DCD application rate. In addition, AOB growth and the amounts of nitrate-N in the soil were significantly related to the application rate of DCD. However, AOA population abundance showed no relationship to the application rate of DCD. The DCD rate at which the AOB growth rate and nitrate-N concentration were halved (effective dosage that causes 50 % reduction in nitrification rate, or ED₅₀) was about 10 kg DCD/ha.

Conclusions

These results suggest that DCD applied at relatively low rates still slowed down the nitrification rate, and the current recommended rate of 10 kg DCD/ha for DCD use in New Zealand grazed pastures would result in a 50 % reduction in nitrification rate in this soil. The actual rate of DCD application used would depend on the cost of the product and the environmental and agronomic benefits that would result from its use.     

The effect of soil pH and dicyandiamide (DCD) on N2O emissions and ammonia oxidiser abundance in a stimulated grazed pasture soil

Purpose

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is a potent greenhouse gas which is mainly produced from agricultural soils through the processes of nitrification and denitrification. Although denitrification is usually the major process responsible for N₂O emissions, N₂O production from nitrification can increase under some soil conditions. Soil pH can affect N₂O emissions by altering N transformations and microbial communities. Bacterial (AOB) and archaeal (AOA) ammonia oxidisers are important for N₂O production as they carry out the rate-limiting step of the nitrification process.

Material and methods

A field study was conducted to investigate the effect of soil pH changes on N₂O emissions, AOB and AOA community abundance, and the efficacy of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), at reducing N₂O emissions from animal urine applied to soil. The effect of three pH treatments, namely alkaline treatment (CaO/NaOH), acid treatment (HCl) and native (water) and four urine and DCD treatments as control (no urine or DCD), urine-only, DCD-only and urine + DCD were assessed in terms of their effect on N₂O emissions and ammonia oxidiser community growth.

Results and discussion

Results showed that total N₂O emissions were increased when the soil was acidified by the acid treatment. This was probably due to incomplete denitrification caused by the inhibition of the assembly of the N₂O reductase enzyme under acidic conditions. AOB population abundance increased when the pH was increased in the alkaline treatment, particularly when animal urine was applied. In contrast, AOA grew in the acid treatment, once the initial inhibitory effect of the urine had subsided. The addition of DCD decreased total N₂O emissions significantly in the acid treatment and decreased peak N₂O emissions in all pH treatments. DCD also inhibited AOB growth in both the alkaline and native pH treatments and inhibited AOA growth in the acid treatment.

Conclusions

These results show that N₂O emissions increase when soil pH decreases. AOB and AOA prefer different soil pH environments to grow: AOB growth is favoured in an alkaline pH and AOA growth favoured in more acidic soils. DCD was effective in inhibiting AOB and AOA when they were actively growing under the different soil pH conditions.     

A lysimeter study of nitrate leaching from grazed grassland as affected by a nitrification inhibitor,dicyandiamide, and relationships with ammonia oxidizing bacteria and archaea

Nitrate (NO₃^?) can contribute to surface water eutrophication and is deemed harmful to human health if present at high concentrations in the drinking water. In grazed grassland, most of the NO₃^?‐N leaching occurs from animal urine‐N returns. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), in decreasing NO₃^? leaching in three different soils from different regions of New Zealand under two different rainfall conditions (1260 mm and 2145 mm p.a.), and explore the relationships between NO₃^?‐N leaching loss and ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia oxidizing archaea (AOA). The DCD nitrification inhibitor was found to be highly effective in decreasing NO₃^?‐N leaching losses from all three soils under both rainfall conditions. Total NO₃^?‐N leaching losses from the urine patch areas were decreased from 67.7–457.0 kg NO₃^?‐N/ha to 29.7–257.4 kg NO₃^?‐N/ha by the DCD treatment, giving an average decrease of 59%. The total NO₃^?‐N leaching losses were not significantly affected by the two different rainfall treatments. The total NO₃^?‐N leaching loss was significantly related to the amoA gene copy numbers of the AOB DNA and to nitrification rate in the soil but not to that of the AOA. These results suggest that the DCD nitrification inhibitor is highly effective in decreasing NO₃^? leaching under these different soil and rainfall conditions and that the amount of NO₃^?‐N leached is mainly related to the growth of the AOB population in the nitrogen rich urine patch soils of grazed grassland.     

Effects of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide on soil mineral N, pasture yield, nutrient uptake and pasture quality in a grazed pasture system

Recent lysimeter studies have demonstrated that the nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), can reduce nitrate (NO) leaching losses from cow urine patches in grazed pasture systems. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of fine particle suspension (FPS) DCD on soil mineral N components, pasture yield, nutrient uptake and pasture quality under grazed pasture conditions. A field study was conducted on the Lincoln University dairy farm, Canterbury, New Zealand, from 2002 to 2006. FPS DCD was applied to grazed pasture plots at 10 kg ha^?1 in early May in addition to applied cow urine patches at a nitrogen (N) loading rate of 1000 kg N ha^?1, with DCD reapplied in early August. Soil mineral N levels in the urine patches were monitored. Pasture yield, N and cation concentrations and uptake were measured in treatment urine patches and inter‐urine areas of the pasture. Comparisons were made with control plots which did not receive DCD. NO levels under the DCD‐treated urine patches (0–7.5 cm) were in the order of 10 kg N ha^?1 compared with 40–80 kg N ha^?1 under untreated patches, and soil ammonium (NH) levels were consistently higher under the DCD‐treated patches. The DCD significantly and consistently increased pasture yield in both the urine patches, and inter‐urine areas of the pasture in all 4 years of the trial. Mean annual dry matter (DM) yields over 4 years were inter‐urine areas, 10.3; inter‐urine + DCD, 12.4; urine, 12.4 and urine +DCD 16.0 t DM ha^?1, representing an average DM yield increase of 20 and 29% in inter‐urine and urine patch areas, respectively. On a whole paddock basis, the increase in annual DM yield resulting from DCD application was estimated to be 21%. N, calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K) concentrations in pasture were unaffected by treatment with DCD; however, total annual uptake of these nutrients by pasture was significantly higher in all years where DCD had been applied. Pasture DM, protein, carbohydrate, metabolizable energy and fibre levels and sward clover content were not affected by treatment with DCD. The results demonstrate the agronomic value of the DCD treatment in addition to the environmental benefits in a grazed pasture system.     

Effect of soil aggregate size and dicyandiamide on N2O emissions and ammonia oxidizer abundance in a grazed pasture soil

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is a potent greenhouse gas, which is mainly produced from agricultural soils. Ammonia oxidation is the rate‐determining step in N₂O production, and the process is carried out by ammonia oxidizers, bacteria and archaea. Soil aggregate size has been shown to alter soil properties, which affect N₂O emissions and bacterial communities. However, the effect of aggregate size on temporal and total N₂O emissions and ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and archaea (AOA) is not fully understood. This incubation study investigated the effect of three different soil aggregate sizes on N₂O emissions and ammonia oxidizer abundance under high urine‐N concentrations and the effectiveness of a nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), at reducing N₂O emissions in different aggregate soils. It was found that temporal patterns of N₂O emissions were affected by aggregate size with higher peak emissions in the large and medium aggregates. However, the total emissions were the same due to a ‘switch’ in emissions at day 66, after which smaller aggregates produced higher N₂O emissions. It is suggested that the switch was caused by an increase in aggregate disruption in the small aggregates, following the urine application, due to their higher surface area to volume ratio. AOB and AOA abundances were not significantly affected by aggregate size. DCD was effective in reducing N₂O emissions in all aggregate sizes by an average of 79%. These results suggest that similar ammonia oxidizer abundance is found in soils of different aggregate sizes, and the efficacy of DCD in reducing N₂O emissions was not affected by aggregate size of the soil.     

Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions in spray-irrigated grazed grassland by treating the soil with dicyandiamide, a nitrification inhibitor

Abstract. Nitrous oxide (N₂O) from animal excreta in grazed pasture systems makes up a significant component (c. 10%) of New Zealand's total greenhouse gas inventory. We report an effective method to decrease N₂O emissions from animal urine patches by treating the soil with the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD), in a simulated grazed dairy pasture system under spray irrigation. The soil was a free-draining Lismore stony silt loam (Udic Haplustept loamy skeletal) and the pasture was a mixture of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne ) and white clover ( Trifolium repens ). By treating the soil with DCD, N₂O emissions were decreased by 76% following urine application in the autumn, from 26.7 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ without DCD to an average of 6.4 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ with DCD over the 6-month experimental period. N₂O flux was decreased by 78% following urine application in the spring, from 18 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ without DCD to 3.9 kg N₂O-N ha⁻¹ with the application of DCD over the 3-month period. A single application of DCD immediately after urine was sufficient to effectively mitigate N₂O emissions from the urine. The results showed that repeated applications of DCD after urine application, or mixing DCD with urine, offered no advantage over a single application of DCD immediately after urine deposition.     

A test of a winter farm management option for mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from a dairy farm

A trial was conducted in 2004 and 2005 to evaluate the effect of a stand‐off winter stock management system on nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from a dairy farm in New Zealand. The management system consisted of removing cows from pasture after grazing for 6 h per day and keeping them on a stand‐off pad for the rest of the day during the late autumn/winter seasons in order to reduce soil physical damage because of grazing on wet soils. The N₂O emissions were measured on pasture that was grazed either for all day or for 6 h. The N₂O emissions from the stand‐off pad were also measured. A closed chamber technique was used for measuring N₂O fluxes. The New Zealand International Panel for Climate Change inventory methodology was used to calculate annual N₂O emissions from land application of farm effluent, leached and volatilized N. Significantly lower (P < 0.05) N₂O emission rates were found when the stand‐off grazed pasture was compared to the control in the winter seasons when soil was wet. Total N₂O emission rates measured over one grazing interval in the late autumn/winter (May–August) in 2004 were 2.72 and 1.21 kg N₂O‐N/ha for the control and the stand‐off grazed pastures, respectively. The respective emissions in 2005 were 0.97 and 0.22 kg N₂O‐N/ha. When all possible sources contributing to emissions of N₂O (both measured and calculated from the non‐measured sources) were included, total annual emissions of 7.7 and 7.0 kg N₂O‐N per hectare of grazed pasture in the control and stand‐off treatments, respectively, were estimated. These results suggest that the use of stand‐off pads as a management practice during the wet seasons can be effective at reducing N₂O emissions from dairy farm systems.     

Nitrogen transformation rates and N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O producing pathways in two pasture soils

Purpose

Better understanding of N transformations and the regulation of N₂O-related N transformation processes in pasture soil contributes significantly to N fertilizer management and development of targeted mitigation strategies.

Materials and methods

¹⁵N tracer technique combined with acetylene (C₂H₂) method was used to measure gross N transformation rates and to distinguish pathways of N₂O production in two Australian pasture soils. The soils were collected from Glenormiston (GN) and Terang (TR), Victoria, Australia, and incubated at a soil moisture content of 60% water-filled pore space (WFPS) and at temperature of 20 °C.

Results and discussion

Two tested pasture soils were characterized by high mineralization and immobilization turnover. The average gross N nitrification rate (n_tot) was 7.28 mg N kg^?1 day^?1 in TR soil () and 5.79 mg N kg^?1 day^?1 in GN soil. Heterotrophic nitrification rates (n_h), which accounting for 50.8 and 41.9% of n_tot, and 23.4 and 30.1% of N₂O emissions in GN and TR soils, respectively, played a role similar with autotrophic nitrification in total nitrification and N₂O emission. Denitrification rates in two pasture soils were as low as 0.003–0.004 mg N kg^?1 day^?1 under selected conditions but contributed more than 30% of N₂O emissions.

Conclusions

Results demonstrated that two tested pasture soils were characterized by fast N transformation rates of mineralization, immobilization, and nitrification. Heterotrophic nitrification could be an important NO₃^?–N production transformation process in studied pasture soils. Except for autotrophic nitrification, roles of heterotrophic nitrification and denitrification in N₂O emission in two pasture soils should be considered when developing mitigation strategies.

     

Short‐term N2O,CO2, NH3 fluxes,and N/C transfers in a Danish grass‐clover pasture after simulated urine deposition in autumn

Urine patches are significant hot‐spots of C and N transformations. To investigate the effects of urine composition on C and N turnover and gaseous emissions from a Danish pasture soil, a field plot study was carried out in September 2001. Cattle urine was amended with two levels of ¹³C‐ and ¹⁵N‐labeled urea, corresponding to 5.58 and 9.54 g urea‐N l^–1, to reflect two levels of protein intake. Urine was then added to a sandy‐loam pasture soil equivalent to a rate of 23.3 or 39.8 g urea‐N m^–2. Pools and isotopic labeling of nitrous oxide (N₂O) and CO₂ emissions, extractable urea, ammonium (NH₄⁺), and nitrate (NO₃^–), and plant uptake were monitored during a 14 d period, while ammonia (NH₃) losses were estimated in separate plots amended with unlabeled urine. Ammonia volatilization was estimated to account for 14% and 12% of the urea‐N applied in the low (UL) and high (UH) urea treatment, respectively. The recovery of urea‐derived N as NH₄⁺ increased during the first several days, but isotopic dilution was significant, possibly as a result of stress‐induced microbial metabolism. After a 2 d lag phase, nitrification proceeded at similar rates in UL and UH despite a significant difference in NH₄⁺ availability. Nitrous oxide fluxes were low, but generally increased during the 14 d period, as did the proportion derived from urea‐N. On day 14, the contribution from urea was 23% (UL) and 13% (UH treatment), respectively. Cumulative total losses of N₂O during the 14 d period corresponded to 0.021% (UL) and 0.015% (UH) of applied urea‐N. Nitrification was probably the source of N₂O. Emission of urea‐derived C as CO₂ was only detectable within the first 24 h. Urea‐derived C and N in above‐ground plant material was only significant at the first sampling, indicating that uptake of urine‐C and N via the leaves was small. Urine composition did not influence the potential for N₂O emissions from urine patches under the experimental conditions, but the importance of site conditions and season should be investigated further.     

Reducing nitrous oxide emissions from a maize‐wheat sequence by decreasing soil nitrate concentration: effects of split application of pig slurry and dicyandiamide

Pig slurry (PS) is a valuable nitrogen (N) source for agricultural crops but the simultaneous supply of readily decomposable carbon and mineral N can result in large soil nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions. Our objective was to determine the individual and combined effects of split PS application and addition of a nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide, DCD) on N₂O emissions and soil mineral N concentration in southern Brazil. Soil N₂O fluxes were measured from November 2010 to November 2011 from a maize (Zea mays L.)‐wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) sequence under various fertilizer treatments: no‐N control, PS applied in a single pre‐plant dose with or without DCD, PS split‐applied with or without DCD, and urea split‐applied. Cumulative N₂O emissions increased linearly (R² = 0.73) with increasing soil nitrate (NO₃^?) exposure, indicating that management practices aimed at reducing soil NO₃^? concentrations can decrease soil N₂O emissions. In total for the two crops, splitting PS reduced N₂O emission factors (EF) by 33%, whereas the addition of DCD reduced EF by 60 and 41% when PS was applied in single and split doses, respectively. However, splitting PS or adding DCD failed to reduce N₂O losses more than a single pre‐plant PS application in maize where background soil NO₃^? concentrations were large. The addition of DCD to PS applied as a single pre‐plant dose resulted in the largest reduction in soil N₂O emissions, whereas splitting PS with and without DCD resulted in significantly smaller abatements. Consequently, we concluded that adding DCD to PS in a single pre‐plant application is a better option than splitting PS applications for reducing soil N₂O emissions in no‐till cereal cropping systems in southern Brazil.