推迟灌拔节水对宽幅麦田光合有效辐射的影响

为研究华北平原冬小麦节水高产种植模式,以“济麦22”为研究材料,于2015-2016年和2016-2017年冬小麦生育期间在山东农业大学农学试验站进行试验.该试验设置常规种植和宽幅精播2种种植模式,2种种植模式的冬小麦均进行拔节期灌溉60 mm和拔节后10 d灌溉60 mm²2种灌溉处理,共4种处理.在生育期内对冬小麦的叶面积、光合有效辐射(PAR)截获量、干物质积累量和产量进行观测,分析不同处理对冬小麦生理指标和产量的影响.结果显示,宽幅精播种植模式显著增加了冬小麦的叶面积指数和PAR截获率.推迟灌拔节水显著优化了宽幅精播麦田对PAR的有效利用,进而促进了干物质积累.同时,推迟灌拔节水显著增加了宽幅精播麦田的穗粒数,从而显著提高小麦产量.     

Response of cotton to various levels of nitrogen and water applied to normal and paired sown cotton under drip irrigation in relation to check-basin

Field experiments were conducted for 2 years to investigate the effects of various levels of nitrogen (N) and methods of cotton planting on yield, agronomic efficiency of N (AEN) and water use efficiency (WUE) in cotton irrigated through surface drip irrigation at Bathinda situated in semi-arid region of northwest India. Three levels of N (100, 75 and 50% of recommended N, 75 kg ha⁻¹) were tested under drip irrigation in comparison to 75 kg of N ha⁻¹ in check-basin. The three methods of planting tried were; normal sowing of cotton with row to row spacing of 67.5 cm (NS), normal paired row sowing with row to row spacing of 35 and 100 cm alternately (NP) and dense paired row sowing with row to row spacing of 35 and 55 cm alternately resulting in total number rows and plants to be 1.5 times (DP) than NS and NP. In NS there was one lateral along each row, but in paired sowings there was one lateral between each pair of rows. Consequently the number of laterals and quantity of water applied was 50 and 75% in NP and DP, respectively, as compared with NS in which irrigation water applied was equivalent to check-basin.Drip irrigation under NS resulted in an increase of 258 and 453 kg ha⁻¹ seed cotton yield than check-basin during first and second year, respectively, when same quantity of water and N was applied. Drip irrigation under dense paired sowing (DP) in which the quantity of irrigation water applied was 75% as compared with NS, further increased the yield by 84 and 101 kg ha⁻¹ than NS during first and second year, respectively. Drip irrigation under NP, in which the quantity of water applied and number of laterals used were 50% as compared with drip under NS, resulted in a reduction in seed cotton yield of 257 and 112 kg ha⁻¹ than NS during first and second year, respectively. However, the yield obtained in NP under drip irrigation was equivalent to yield obtained in NS under check-basin during first year but 341 kg ha⁻¹ higher yield was obtained during second year. The decrease in N applied, irrespective of methods of planting, caused a significant decline in seed cotton yield during both the years. Water use efficiency (WUE) under drip irrigation increased from 1.648 to 1.847 and from 0.983 to 1.615 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ during first and second year, respectively, when the same quantity of N and water was applied. The WUE further increased to 2.125 and 1.788 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ under DP during first and second year, respectively. The agronomic efficiency of nitrogen was higher in drip than check-basin during both the years when equal N was applied. The WUE decreased with decrease in the rate of N applied under fertigation but reverse was true for AEN. It is evident that DP under drip irrigation resulted in higher seed cotton yield, WUE and AEN than NS and also saved 25% irrigation water as well as cost of laterals.     

Effects of winter wheat row spacing on evapotranpsiration, grain yield and water use efficiency

A field study was conducted from 2002 to 2007 to investigate the influence of row spacing of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on soil evaporation (E), evapotranspiration (ET), grain production and water use efficiency (WUE) in the North China Plain. The experiment had four row spacing treatments, 7.5 cm, 15 cm, 22.5 cm, and 30 cm, with plots randomly arranged in four replicates. Soil E was measured by micro-lysimeters in three seasons and ET was calculated from measurements of soil profile water depletion, irrigation, and rainfall. The results showed that E increased with row spacing. Compared with the 30-cm row spacing (average E = 112 mm), the reduction in seasonal E averaged 9 mm, 25 mm, and 26 mm for 22.5 cm, 15 cm, and 7.5 cm row spacings, respectively. Crop transpiration (T) increased as row spacing decreased. The seasonal rainfall interception and seasonal ET were relatively unchanged among the treatments. In three out of five seasons, the four different treatments showed similar grain yield, yield components and WUE. We conclude that for winter wheat production in the North China Plain, narrow row spacing reduced soil evaporation, but had minor improvements on grain production and WUE under irrigated conditions with adequate nutrient levels.     

Responses of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) evapotranspiration and yield to sprinkler irrigation regimes

The North China Plain (NCP) is one of the main productive regions for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and summer maize (Zea mays L.) in China. However, water-saving irrigation technologies (WSITs), such as sprinkler irrigation technology and improved surface irrigation technology, and water management practices, such as irrigation scheduling have been adopted to improve field-level water use efficiency especially in winter wheat growing season, due to the water scarcity and continuous increase of water in industry and domestic life in the NCP. As one of the WSITs, sprinkler irrigation has been increasingly used in the NCP during the past 20 years. In this paper, a three-year field experiment was conducted to investigate the responses of volumetric soil water content (SWC), winter wheat yield, evapotranspiration (ET), water use efficiency (WUE) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) to sprinkler irrigation regimes based on the evaporation from an uncovered, 20-cm diameter pan located 0-5 cm above the crop canopy in order to develop an appropriate sprinkler irrigation scheduling for winter wheat in the NCP. Results indicated that the temporal variations in SWC for irrigation treatments in the 0-60-cm soil layer were considerably larger than what occurred at deeper depths, whereas temporal variations in SWC for non-irrigation treatments were large throughout the 0-120-cm soil layer. Crop leaf area index, dry biomass, 1000-grains weight and yield were negatively affected by water stress for those treatments with irrigation depth less than 0.50E, where E is the net evaporation (which includes rainfall) from the 20-cm diameter pan. While irrigation with a depth over 1.0E also had negative effect on 1000-grains weight and yield. The seasonal ET of winter wheat was in a range of 206-499 mm during the three years experiments. Relatively high yield, WUE and IWUE were found for the irrigation depth of 0.63E. Therefore, for winter wheat in the NCP the recommended amount of irrigation to apply for each event is the total 0.63E that occurred after the previous irrigation provided total E is in a range of 30-40 mm.     

Root growth, available soil water, and water-use efficiency of winter wheat under different irrigation regimes applied at different growth stages in North China

Field experiments were conducted at the Luancheng Agro-Ecosystem Experimental Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences during the winter wheat growing seasons in 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. Experiments involving winter wheat with 1, 2, and 3 irrigation applications at jointing, heading, or milking were conducted, and the total irrigation water supplied was maintained at 120 mm. The results indicated that irrigation during the later part of the winter wheat growing season and increase in irrigation frequency decreased the available soil water; this result was mainly due to the changes in the vertical distribution of root length density. In ≤30-cm-deep soil profiles, 3 times irrigation at jointing, heading, and milking increased the root length density, while in >30-cm-deep soil profiles, 1 time irrigation at jointing resulted in the highest root length density. With regard to evapotranspiration (ET), there was no significant (LSD, P < 0.05) difference between the regimes wherein irrigation was applied only once at jointing; 2 times at jointing and heading; and 3 times at jointing, heading, and milking. Compared with 1 and 3 times irrigation during the winter wheat growing season, 2 times irrigation increased grain yield and 2 times irrigation at jointing and heading produced the highest water-use efficiency (WUE). Combining the results obtained regarding grain yield and WUE, it can be concluded that irrigation at the jointing and heading stages results in high grain yield and WUE, which will offer a sound measurement for developing deficit irrigation regimes in North China.     

Evaluation of the VegSyst model with muskmelon to simulate crop growth, nitrogen uptake and evapotranspiration

Like many intensive vegetable production systems, the greenhouse-based system on the south-eastern (SE) Mediterranean coast of Spain is associated with considerable NO₃⁻ contamination of groundwater. Drip irrigation and sophisticated fertigation systems provide the technical capacity for precise nutrient and irrigation management of soil-grown crops which would reduce NO₃⁻ leaching loss. The VegSyst crop simulation model was developed to simulate daily crop biomass production, N uptake and crop evapotranspiration (ET_c). VegSyst is driven by thermal time and consequently is adaptable to different planting dates, different greenhouse cooling practices and differences in greenhouse design. It will be subsequently incorporated into a practical on-farm decision support system to enable growers to more effectively use the advanced technical capacity of this horticultural system for optimal N and irrigation management.VegSyst was calibrated and validated for muskmelon grown in Mediterranean plastic greenhouse in SE Spain using data of four melon crops, two grown in 2005 and two in 2006 using two management strategies of water and N management in each year. VegSyst very accurately simulated crop biomass production and accurately simulated crop N uptake over time. Model performance in simulating dry matter production (DMP) over time was better using a double radiation use efficiency (RUE) approach (5.0 and 3.2 g MJ⁻¹ PAR for vegetative and reproductive growth phases) compared to a single RUE approach (4.3 g MJ⁻¹ PAR). The simulation of ET_c over time, was very accurate in the two 2006 muskmelon crops and somewhat less so in the two 2005 crops. The error in the simulated final values, expressed as a percentage of final measured values was −1 to 6% for DMP, 2-11% for crop N uptake, and −11 to 6% for ET_c. VegSyst provided effective simulation of DMP, N uptake and ET_c for crops with different planting dates. This model can be readily adapted to other crops.     

Soil water storage and drainage under cotton-based cropping systems in a furrow-irrigated Vertisol

Comparative studies of drainage and leaching under tillage systems in irrigated tropical and sub-tropical Vertisols are sparse. The objective of this study was to quantify drainage under cotton-based cropping systems sown on permanent beds in an irrigated Vertisol. Drainage and soil water storage were measured with the chloride mass balance method and neutron moisture meter, respectively, during the 2002-03, 2004-05, 2006-07 and 2008-09 cotton seasons in an on-going experiment in a Vertisol in NW NSW. The experimental treatments were: cotton monoculture sown either after conventional tillage or on permanent beds, and a cotton-wheat rotation on permanent beds where the wheat stubble was retained as in situ mulch into which the following cotton crop was sown. Subject to in-crop rainfall, irrigation frequency varied between 7 and 14 days for cotton and 2-3 months for wheat. In 2005, a split-plot design was superimposed on the existing experiment such that the main-plot treatments were irrigation frequency (“frequent”, 7-14-day irrigation interval; “infrequent”, 14-21-day irrigation interval), and sub-plot treatments were the historical tillage system/crop rotation combinations. In comparison with cotton monoculture sown either after conventional tillage or on permanent beds, soil water storage, particularly during the early part of growing season when rainfall provided the major proportion of crop water requirements, and drainage were greatest when a cotton-wheat rotation was sown on permanent beds. Seasonal drainage out of the 1.2 m depth, averaged among all seasons, was of the order of 25 mm, 33 mm and 70 mm with cotton monoculture sown either after conventional tillage or on permanent beds, and a cotton-wheat rotation on permanent beds, respectively. Soil water storage and drainage were also greater when irrigation frequency was greater. Seasonal drainage out of the 1.2 m depth, averaged between the 2006-07 and 2008-09 seasons, was 54 mm with “frequent irrigation”, and 28 mm with “infrequent” irrigation. Infiltration was less in management systems which resulted in wetter soil; viz. frequent irrigation or a cotton-wheat rotation on permanent beds with in situ stubble retention. Drainage water losses in a furrow-irrigated Vertisol may be reduced and soil water storage increased (i.e. water conservation improved) by sowing a cotton-wheat rotation with in situ stubble retention under less frequent irrigation.     

垄作小麦产量及水分生产效率的试验研究

为探讨豫西地区冬小麦节水栽培的生产措施,在大田试验条件下,研究了在3种灌水处理下,垄作冬小麦耗水量、干物质积累、产量和水分生产效率的对比情况。结果表明,在不同灌水次数的条件下,随着灌水次数的增加,垄作冬小麦耗水量和地上干物质积累量逐渐增加,产量和水分生产效率先升高后降低。在相同灌水次数下,垄作冬小麦耗水量低于平作,干物...     

夏花生节水高产的优化配套技术研究

为了提高麦垄套种夏花生产量,同时又节水,于河南省新乡县古固寨镇开展了夏花生节水高产试验研究。研究结果表明,麦垄套夏花生高产栽培必须把小麦和花生两季作为一个整体进行综合考虑;既要考虑品种结构和种植模式的优化,又要根据这两种作物需肥需水规律进行合理水肥运筹。冬小麦应选用适当晚播、早熟的品种、如豫麦１８－６４系和温麦４号,６号等,采用宽行２４ｃｍ、窄行１２ｃｍ的宽窄楼播种;于麦收前１０￣１５ｄ在小麦宽垄     

种植模式和灌溉对冬小麦生长、产量及品质的影响

为了研究不同种植模式和灌水量对冬小麦生长、产量及品质的影响,2010-2011年在陕西杨凌对垄上覆膜沟播小麦与平作播种方式进行了对比试验。结果表明,冬小麦的产量随着灌水量的增加呈现先增后减的趋势。起垄覆膜沟播的产量和水分利用效率均明显高于平作。起垄覆膜中水处理比平作中水处理增产421kg/hm2,水分利用效率提高4.95kg/(hm2.mm)。籽粒粗蛋白含量随着灌水量的增加而降低,而淀粉含量则相反。基于综合因素考虑,选择覆膜中水产量和水分利用效率都达到最高,而蛋白含量仅比低水处理低0.53%,淀粉含量比高水处理低0.268%,因此在实践中选择覆膜中水处理(总灌水量260mm)可以实现节水、高产、优质目标。     

Irrigation strategies to improve the water use efficiency of wheat-maize double cropping systems in North China Plain

Water is the most important limiting factor of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) double cropping systems in the North China Plain (NCP). A two-year experiment with four irrigation levels based on crop growth stages was used to calibrate and validate RZWQM2, a hybrid model that combines the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) and DSSAT4.0. The calibrated model was then used to investigate various irrigation strategies for high yield and water use efficiency (WUE) using weather data from 1961 to 1999. The model simulated soil moisture, crop yield, above-ground biomass and WUE in responses to irrigation schedules well, with root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.029 cm³ cm⁻³, 0.59 Mg ha⁻¹, 2.05 Mg ha⁻¹, and 0.19 kg m⁻³, respectively, for wheat; and 0.027 cm³ cm⁻³, 0.71 Mg ha⁻¹, 1.51 Mg ha⁻¹ and 0.35 kg m⁻³, respectively, for maize. WUE increased with the amount of irrigation applied during the dry growing season of 2001-2002, but was less sensitive to irrigation during the wet season of 2002-2003. Long-term simulation using weather data from 1961 to 1999 showed that initial soil water at planting was adequate (at 82% of crop available water) for wheat establishment due to the high rainfall during the previous maize season. Preseason irrigation for wheat commonly practiced by local farmers should be postponed to the most sensitive growth stage (stem extension) for higher yield and WUE in the area. Preseason irrigation for maize is needed in 40% of the years. With limited irrigation available (100, 150, 200, or 250 mm per year), 80% of the water allocated to the critical wheat growth stages and 20% applied at maize planting achieved the highest WUE and the least water drainage overall for the two crops.     

Effect of precipitation change on water balance and WUE of the winter wheat-summer maize rotation in the North China Plain

Limited precipitation restricts crop yield in the North China Plain, where high level of production depends largely on irrigation. Establishing the optimal irrigation scheduling according to the crop water requirement (CWR) and precipitation is the key factor to achieve rational water use. Precipitation data collected for about 40 years were employed to analyze the long-term trend, and weather data from 1984 to 2005 were used to estimate the CWR and irrigation water requirements (IWR). Field experiments were performed at the Luancheng Station from 1997 to 2005 to calculate the soil water consumption and water use efficiency (WUE). The results showed the CWR for winter wheat and summer maize were similar and about 430 mm, while the IWR ranged from 247 to 370 mm and 0 to 336 mm at the 25% and 75% precipitation exceedance probabilities for winter wheat and summer maize, respectively. The irrigation applied varied in the different rainfall years and the optimal irrigation amount was about 186, 161 and 99 mm for winter wheat and 134, 88 and 0 mm for summer maize in the dry, normal and wet seasons, respectively. However, as precipitation reduces over time especially during the maize growing periods, development of water-saving management practices for sustainable agriculture into the future is imperative.     

种植模式及灌水频次对冬小麦抗倒性的影响

为了研究高效节水灌溉模式对冬小麦抗倒伏能力和产量的影响,采用2种种植模式(宽幅精播种植和常规种植),每种种植模式设3种灌溉处理(拔节期、抽穗期和灌浆期各灌溉40 mm,拔节期和抽穗期各灌溉60 mm和拔节期一次灌溉120 mm),进行了灌溉频次和宽幅精播对冬小麦生育后期茎秆主要物理性状参数、机械强度、抗倒伏指数、产量及产量构成因素等的影响研究.结果表明,灌溉总量一定情况下,抽穗期、灌浆期和蜡熟期的冬小麦重心高度随着灌溉频次的增加而降低,3次灌溉对冬小麦茎秆倒数第二节间外径影响最大;1次和2次灌溉下常规种植倒数第二节间机械强度均显著大于宽幅精播,而3次灌溉下的抗倒伏指数均大于1次和2次灌溉;冬小麦茎秆机械强度和鲜质量呈显著相关,抗倒伏指数和重心高度呈显著负相关;无论何种种植模式均为2次灌溉下的产量最高,相对于常规种植模式,在减少灌溉频次的情况下,宽幅精播种植模式可以通过提高穗数发挥增产潜力.研究表明,统筹考虑冬小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力和籽粒产量,拔节期和抽穗期各灌溉60 mm和宽幅精播相结合是一种有效的节水种植模式.     

Effect of different pre-sowing water application depths on wheat yield under spate irrigation in Dera Ismael Khan District of Pakistan

Spate irrigation is a method of flood water harvesting, practiced in Dera Ismael Khan (D.I. Khan), Pakistan for agricultural production for the last several hundred years in which during monsoon period flood water is used for irrigation before wheat sowing. A field study on the effect of different pre-sowing water application depths on the yield of wheat was conducted during 2006-2007. The spate irrigation command areas normally receive the flood water as a result of rainfall on the mountains during the months of July to September, which also carries a significant amount of sediment load. The flood water flows in different torrents and is diverted through earthen bunds to the fields for irrigation with depth of water application ranging from 21 to 73 cm and resulted in sediment deposition of 1.8-3.6 cm per irrigation. In this study, the effect on wheat yield of three different pre-sowing water application depths (D1 < 30 cm, D2 = 30-45 cm and D3 > 45 cm) were studied under field conditions. Fifteen fields with field sizes of about 2-3 ha were randomly selected, in each field five samples were collected for analysis of soil physical properties, yield and yield components. Five major soil texture classes (silty clay, clay loam, silty clay loam, silt loam and loam) were found in the area with water-holding capacity ranging from 23% to 36.3% (on a volume basis) and bulk density varied from 1.35 to 1.42 g cm⁻³. About 36% more grain yield was obtained from loam soil fields, followed by silt loam (24%) as compared to wheat grown on silty clay soil condition. The maximum wheat grain yield of 3448 kg ha⁻¹ was obtained from fields with water application depths of 30-45 cm and the lowest wheat yield was recorded in fields with water application depths greater than 45 cm. On-farm application efficiencies ranged from 22% to 93% with an overall average of about 49%. Due to large and uneven fields, a lot of water is lost. In general, the application efficiency decreased with increasing water application depth. Based on the results of this research, in arid to semi-arid environments, for optimum wheat yield under spate irrigation, the pre-sowing water application depth may be about 30-45 cm (September to July) and under or over irrigation should be avoided.     

不同种植模式冬小麦耗水特性及产量试验研究

通过田间试验,研究了两种种植模式（传统平作和垄植沟灌）不同水分处理对冬小麦耗水特性和产量的影响。结果表明：相较于传统平作种植模式,垄植沟灌冬小麦的全生育期耗水量减少26.26~31.92mm,穗粒数和千粒重分别增加6.09%和3.79%,增产150.57~237.63kg/hm2,水分利用效率提高9.43%~10.39%;两种种植模式的耗水量和产量与水分处理呈正相关,但随着水分控制下限的提高,水分利用效率则先增大后减小;确定垄植沟灌为冬小麦适宜种植方式,并在L-70水分处理获得了最优的水分利用效率,达到1.91 kg/m3,产量达到7589.96 kg/hm2。     

The effect of rice straw mulch on evapotranspiration, transpiration and soil evaporation of irrigated wheat in Punjab, India

Soil evaporation (Es) is considered to be a non-productive component of evapotranspiration (ET). So, measures which moderate Es may influence the amount of water available for transpiration (T), the productive component of ET. Field experiments investigating the effects of rice straw mulch on components of the water balance of irrigated wheat were conducted during 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 in Punjab, India, on a clay loam soil. Daily Es was measured using mini-lysimeters, and total seasonal ET was estimated as the missing term in the water balance equation. Mulch lowered total Es over the crop growth season by 35 and 40 mm in relatively high and low rainfall years, respectively. Much of this “saved water” was partitioned into T, which increased by 30 and 37 mm in the high and low rainfall years, respectively. As a result, total ET was not affected by mulch in either year. In both years, there was a trend for higher biomass production and grain yield with mulch, but with significant differences only in 2006-2007. Transpiration efficiency (TE) with respect to grain yield was 18.8-19.1 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ in 2006-2007, and 14.6-16.4 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ in 2007-2008. While wheat grown in the presence of mulch tended to lower TE, this was only significant in 2007-2008. The results suggest that while mulching of well-irrigated wheat reduces Es, it does not “save” water because the crop compensates by increased T and reduced TE.     

Maize yield potential: critical processes and simulation modeling in a high-yielding environment

Understanding processes of maize (Zea mays L.) growth and production of grain in high-yielding, irrigated conditions offers hope to understand yield potential in many other environments. In this study we investigated such processes at the plant level, and attempted to simulate maize yields at the field level and county level in the high yielding region of the High Plains of Texas. In addition, we used the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from satellite data of year 2000 to update leaf area index for yield simulation in three counties. In the field study, we measured maize leaf area index (LAI), the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation intercepted (FIPAR), and the harvest index (HI) in irrigated plots near Dumas, Texas. The light extinction coefficient (k) for Beer's law was calculated with the FIPAR and the LAI. The radiation use efficiency (RUE) was determined with sequential measurements of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intercepted and biomass harvests. The RUE was 3.98 g of above-ground biomass per MJ of intercepted PAR in 1999 and 3.41 in 2000 for three sampling dates prior to silking. These values are 106 and 93% of the expected RUE values at the measured vapor pressure deficits, using a previously published response function. The mean k value was −0.46 in 1999 and −0.47 in 2000, similar to the expected value of −0.43 reported in the literature for this row spacing. The mean HI measured in 2000 was 0.52, similar to values of 0.53 and 0.54 in the literature. Application of these parameters to maize simulation with the Agriculture Land Management Alternatives with Numerical Assessment Criteria (ALMANAC) model for 13 center pivot irrigated fields near Dumas in 1999 provided simulations within 1.0 Mg ha⁻¹ with a mean error of 0.03 Mg ha⁻¹ and a mean square error of 0.10. For five years of grain yields reported for each of four counties in this region of Texas, ALMANAC simulations were within 5% of the mean measured yields. Introduction of PAR interception, based on the satellite-derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), into ALMANAC resulted in slight increases in accuracy of yield prediction for two counties and a slight decrease in accuracy in one county for year 2000. Consistency in values of RUE, k, and HI in this study as compared with values reported in the literature will aid modelers simulating maize growth and grain yields in similar high-yielding, irrigated conditions.     

Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass

Water regulations have decreased irrigation water supplies in Nebraska and some other areas of the USA Great Plains. When available water is not enough to meet crop water requirements during the entire growing cycle, it becomes critical to know the proper irrigation timing that would maximize yields and profits. This study evaluated the effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation (150 mm) on crop evapotranspiration (ETc), yield, water use efficiency (WUE = yield/ETc), irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE = yield/irrigation), and dry mass (DM) of corn (Zea mays L.) irrigated with subsurface drip irrigation in the semiarid climate of North Platte, NE. During 2005 and 2006, a total of sixteen irrigation treatments (eight each year) were evaluated, which received different percentages of the water allocation during July, August, and September. During both years, all treatments resulted in no crop stress during the vegetative period and stress during the reproductive stages, which affected ETc, DM, yield, WUE and IWUE. Among treatments, ETc varied by 7.2 and 18.8%; yield by 17 and 33%; WUE by 12 and 22%, and IWUE by 18 and 33% in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Yield and WUE both increased linearly with ETc and with ETc/ETp (ETp = seasonal ETc with no water stress), and WUE increased linearly with yield. The yield response factor (ky) averaged 1.50 over the two seasons. Irrigation timing affected the DM of the plant, grain, and cob, but not that of the stover. It also affected the percent of DM partitioned to the grain (harvest index), which increased linearly with ETc and averaged 56.2% over the two seasons, but did not affect the percent allocated to the cob or stover. Irrigation applied in July had the highest positive coefficient of determination (R²) with yield. This high positive correlation decreased considerably for irrigation applied in August, and became negative for irrigation applied in September. The best positive correlation between the soil water deficit factor (Ks) and yield occurred during weeks 12-14 from crop emergence, during the “milk” and “dough” growth stages. Yield was poorly correlated to stress during weeks 15 and 16, and the correlation became negative after week 17. Dividing the 150 mm allocation about evenly among July, August and September was a good strategy resulting in the highest yields in 2005, but not in 2006. Applying a larger proportion of the allocation in July was a good strategy during both years, and the opposite resulted when applying a large proportion of the allocation in September. The different results obtained between years indicate that flexible irrigation scheduling techniques should be adopted, rather than relying on fixed timing strategies.     

宽幅精播和灌溉对冬小麦干物质积累及产量的影响

采用了宽幅精播和常规种植2种种植模式,每种种植模式设3种灌溉处理,研究了宽幅精播和灌溉对冬小麦群体动态变化、干物质积累量和产量等的影响。结果显示,灌拔节水和抽穗水后,宽幅精播的分蘖消亡速率低于常规种植。在冬小麦生育后期,宽幅精播显著提高了干物质积累量。宽幅精播的产量显著高于常规种植,增产的原因在于穗数的显著增加。研究表明,宽幅精播结合灌拔节水和抽穗水为一种值得推广的节水种植模式。     

Modelling the effects of climate variability and water management on crop water productivity and water balance in the North China Plain

In the North China Plain (NCP), while irrigation using groundwater has maintained a high-level crop productivity of the wheat-maize double cropping systems, it has resulted in rapid depletion of groundwater table. For more efficient and sustainable utilization of the limited water resources, improved understanding of how crop productivity and water balance components respond to climate variations and irrigation is essential. This paper investigates such responses using a modelling approach. The farming systems model APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems Simulator) was first calibrated and validated using 3 years of experimental data. The validated model was then applied to simulate crop yield and field water balance of the wheat-maize rotation in the NCP. Simulated dryland crop yield ranged from 0 to 4.5 t ha⁻¹ for wheat and 0 to 5.0 t ha⁻¹ for maize. Increasing irrigation amount led to increased crop yield, but irrigation required to obtain maximum water productivity (WP) was much less than that required to obtain maximum crop yield. To meet crop water demand, a wide range of irrigation water supply would be needed due to the inter-annual climate variations. The range was simulated to be 140-420 mm for wheat, and 0-170 mm for maize. Such levels of irrigation applications could potentially lead to about 1.5 m year⁻¹ decline in groundwater table when other sources of groundwater recharge were not considered. To achieve maximum WP, one, two and three irrigations (i.e., 70, 150 and 200 mm season⁻¹) were recommended for wheat in wet, medium and dry seasons, respectively. For maize, one irrigation and two irrigations (i.e., 60 and 110 mm season⁻¹) were recommended in medium and dry seasons, while no irrigation was needed in wet season.