Fecal alpha1-proteinase inhibitor concentration in dogs receiving long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy

Background: Fecal α₁‐proteinase inhibitor (α₁‐PI) clearance is a reliable, noninvasive marker for protein‐losing enteropathy (PLE) in human beings. An assay for measurement of this protein in the dog has been developed and validated and may be useful for the investigation of gastrointestinal disease in this species. Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) frequently are administered to dogs and may have adverse effects on the gastrointestinal tract, including gastroduodenal ulceration and altered mucosal permeability. The value of fecal α₁‐PI measurement in detecting unrelated gastrointestinal disease may be limited in dogs on NSAID therapy, but α₁‐PI may be a useful marker for NSAID‐induced gastrointestinal damage. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of long‐term administration of NSAIDs on fecal α₁‐PI concentrations in dogs. Methods: Fecal samples were collected from 2 groups of dogs: 1) 21 clinically‐healthy client‐owned dogs without signs of gastrointestinal disease and receiving no NSAIDs and 2) 7 dogs referred for investigation and treatment of orthopedic disorders; the dogs had received either meloxicam or carprofen daily for at least 30 days. Fecal α₁‐PI concentration was measured by ELISA. Results: Fecal α₁‐PI concentrations, expressed as μg/g of feces, were not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (median [range], group 1: 9.9 μg/g [0.0–32.1 μg/g]; group 2: 5.6 μg/g [1.1–32.3 μg/g]; P= .81). Conclusions: These results suggest that use of cyclooxygenase‐2‐selective NSAIDs, such as carprofen and meloxicam, does not significantly affect fecal α₁‐PI measurements. However, study numbers were small, and larger prospective trials are required to assess more accurately the gastrointestinal effects of NSAIDs in dogs.     

Fecal alpha1-proteinase inhibitor concentration in dogs with chronic gastrointestinal disease

Background: Fecal α₁‐proteinase inhibitor (α₁‐PI) clearance is a reliable, noninvasive marker for protein‐losing enteropathy in human beings. An assay for use in dogs has been developed and validated. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate fecal α₁‐PI concentration in dogs with chronic gastrointestinal disease, compared with healthy dogs, and to assess its correlation with serum albumin concentration. Methods: Fecal samples were collected from 2 groups of dogs. Group 1 consisted of 21 clinically healthy client‐owned dogs without signs of gastrointestinal disease. Group 2 consisted of 16 dogs referred for investigation of suspected gastrointestinal disease. On the basis of gastric and duodenal biopsies, group 2 was further subdivided into dogs with normal histology (n = 9) and those with histologic abnormalities (n = 7: inflammatory bowel disease, n = 3; lymphangiectasia, n = 4). An ELISA was used to measure α₁‐PI concentrations in fecal extracts. Results: Fecal α₁‐PI concentrations, expressed as μg/g of feces, were not significantly different between groups 1 and 2 as a whole. However, fecal α₁‐PI concentrations (median, minimum‐maximum) were significantly higher in dogs with gastrointestinal diseases associated with histologic abnormalities (60.6 μg/g, 7.4–201.7 μg/g) compared with dogs with normal histology (3.8 μg/g, 0.7–74.0 μg/g) and control dogs (9.9 μg/g, 0.0–32.1 μg/g). There was no significant correlation between fecal α₁‐PI and serum albumin concentrations in dogs with gastrointestinal disease. Conclusions: Increased fecal α₁‐PI concentration may signal the need to obtain gastrointestinal biopsies for a final diagnosis. Fecal α₁‐PI concentration may be a useful test for early detection of protein‐losing enteropathy before decreases in serum albumin concentration can be detected.     

Protein-losing enteropathy in dogs is associated with decreased fecal proteolytic activity

Background: Measurement of proteolytic activity in feces is a traditional method for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). A drawback of this method is the occurrence of falsely low results that may lead to a false‐positive diagnosis of EPI. We hypothesized that intestinal loss of serum proteinase inhibitors in protein‐losing enteropathy (PLE) may inhibit fecal proteolytic activity and be a potential source of false low results. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of PLE on fecal proteolytic activity in dogs. Methods: Fecal proteolytic activity was measured using a radial diffusion casein digestion assay in 12 samples from 4 clinically healthy control dogs and 30 samples from 16 dogs with PLE. Gastrointestinal protein loss was assessed using an ELISA to determine fecal canine α₁‐proteinase inhibitor concentration. The relationship between the concentration of canine α₁‐proteinase inhibitor in the feces and the diameter cleared in the casein digestion assay was determined. The mean clearing diameter was compared between control dogs and dogs with PLE. Results: A significant negative correlation was observed between fecal canine α₁‐proteinase inhibitor concentration and casein clearing diameter (P < .001, Pearson r=—.6317, r 2 =.3999). Mean clearing diameter was significantly lower in dogs with PLE than in control dogs (12.63 vs 16.83 mm, P < .001, two‐tailed Student's t‐test). Conclusion: Increased fecal loss of α₁‐proteinase inhibitor in dogs with PLE is associated with a significant decrease in fecal proteolytic activity and may result in a false positive diagnosis of EPI.     

Effect of early enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability, intestinal protein loss, and outcome in dogs with severe parvoviral enteritis

A randomized, controlled clinical trial investigated the effect of early enteral nutrition (EN) on intestinal permeability, intestinal protein loss, and outcome in parvoviral enteritis. Dogs were randomized into 2 groups: 15 dogs received no food until vomiting had ceased for 12 hours (mean 50 hours after admission; NPO group), and 15 dogs received early EN by nasoesophageal tube from 12 hours after admission (EEN group). All other treatments were identical. Intestinal permeability was assessed by 6-hour urinary lactulose (L) and rhamnose (R) recoveries (%L, %R) and L/R recovery ratios. Intestinal protein loss was quantified by fecal alpha1-proteinase inhibitor concentrations (alpha1-PI). Median time to normalization of demeanor, appetite, vomiting, and diarrhea was 1 day shorter for the EEN group for each variable. Body weight increased insignificantly from admission in the NPO group (day 3: 2.5 +/- 2.8%; day 6: 4.3 +/- 2.3%; mean +/- SE), whereas the EEN group exhibited significant weight gain (day 3: 8.1 +/- 2.7%; day 6: 9.7 +/- 2.1%). Mean urinary %L was increased, %R reduced, and L/R recovery ratios increased compared to reference values throughout the study for both groups. Percent lactulose recovery decreased in the EEN group (admission: 22.6 +/- 8.0%; day 6: 17.9 +/- 2.3%) and increased in the NPO group (admission: 11.0 +/- 2.6%; day 6: 22.5 +/- 4.6%, P = .035). Fecal alpha1-PI was above reference values in both groups and declined progressively. No significant differences occurred for %R, L/R ratios, or alpha1-PI between groups. Thirteen NPO dogs and all EEN dogs survived (P = .48). The EEN group showed earlier clinical improvement and significant weight gain. The significantly decreased %L in the EEN versus NPO group might reflect improved gut barrier function, which could limit bacterial or endotoxin translocation.