Prevalence of incidental humeral intracondylar fissures in brachycephalic breed dogs in CT studies

Humeral intracondylar fissures (HIF) have been predominantly reported in spaniel breeds and proposed to be possible risk factors for humeral condyle fractures (HCF). We hypothesized that the prevalence of incidental HIF in French Bulldogs may be greater than that of other brachycephalic breeds. A retrospective, observational, prevalence study was performed using CT examinations of French bulldogs and other brachycephalic breed dogs presenting for an unrelated condition. Two European College of Veterinary Diagnostic and Imaging-certified radiologists reviewed the images of the humeral condyles of these dogs. A classification system was devised to grade the findings. We considered a Score 1 to be normal, Score 2 to have centralised sclerosis, Score 3 to have a partial fissure and Score 4 to have a complete fissure. A total of 228 elbows were reviewed from 122 dogs. Of this population, 145 elbows were from French Bulldogs, 54 were from Pugs, and the remainder were from a mix of other brachycephalic breeds. The prevalence of HIF (score 3 or 4) in elbows of the French bulldog, pug and other breed groups was 6.9% (CI 2.8–11%), 5.6% (CI 0–11.7%), and 3.4% (CI 0–10.15%), respectively. At a dog level, the prevalence of HIF (score 3 or 4 present in at least one elbow) was found to be 11.8% (CI 4.6–19%) in French Bulldogs, 11.1% (CI 0–22.9%) in Pugs, and 5.26% (CI 0–15%) in the other breed group. There was no significant difference between the breed groups. The inter-reviewer reliability for CT scoring of HIF based on Cohen's weighted kappa was low at 0.19.     

Magnetic resonance imaging features of canine incomplete humeral condyle ossification

Incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle (IOHC) is characterized by an intracondylar fissure located where the intercondylar physis is present in growing dogs. Its radiologic and computed tomographic features have been described but the magnetic resonance (MR) features have not been characterized. Our purpose was to further describe the range of MRappearances of IOHC, to assess the diagnostic capability of MRrelative to radiology, and to determine whether MRis able to identify the disease before a fissure forms. Thirty-eight elbow MRscans and radiographs, when available, were reviewed and divided into three groups. In Group 1 (affected elbows, n = 22), there was an intracondylar defect on MRwith variable appearance; the defect was not visible radiographically in 32% of the elbows. The main difference between Group 2 (nonaffected elbows, n = 6) and Group 3 (contralaterals to IOHC or to condylar fracture, without fissure, n = 10) was the appearance of the humeral condyle in short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences: all elbows in Group 2 had a homogeneous humeral condyle, whereas all but one in Group 3 were heterogeneous. One dog in Group 3 developed a complete condylar fissure 7 months after the first examination, when no evidence of an intracondylar defect had been detected. The MRappearance of IOHC is variable and a heterogeneous humeral condyle in STIR images without a clear defect may warn of the possibility for the subsequent development of a condylar fissure.     

Computed tomographic features of incomplete ossification of the canine humeral condyle

Objectives— To describe computed tomographic (CT) features of canine elbows with incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle (IOHC) and investigate co-existing incongruence in the elbow joint.
Study Design— Case control study.
Animals— Dogs with IOHC (n=20; 38 elbows) and 25 normal elbows.
Methods— Elbows with IOHC and normal elbows were assessed by CT. Standardized dorsal and sagittal reconstructions were created at 3 levels using image analysis software to obtain single measurements of the humero-radial and humero-ulnar joint spaces. On dorsal plane reconstructions, joint space measurements were obtained at the center point of the humero-radial and humero-ulnar articulations. Joint incongruity was defined as the difference between the humero-radial and the humero-ulnar joint spaces.
Results— Nineteen dogs (95%), all Spaniel breeds, had either bilateral IOHC demonstrable as a saw-toothed intercondylar complete or incomplete hypoattenuating defect with hyperattenuating margins, or IOHC with contralateral humeral condylar fracture (HCF). Joint incongruity values for IOHC were compared with those of normal elbows. Significant differences were noted at the levels of the medial coronoid apex ( P <.0001) and base ( P <.004) indicative of humero-ulnar incongruence. Evidence of medial coronoid disease in 10 elbows (26%) and degenerative joint disease in 30 elbows (79%) was also found.
Conclusions— Presence of elbow incongruence may be an underlying factor in failure of ossification centers to fuse leading to IOHC.
Clinical Relevance— IOHC is clearly defined by CT, and it should be considered in larger Spaniel breeds, with a chronic forelimb lameness or HCF.     

Principles of treatment for canine lymphoma

Canine lymphoma is one of the most commonly diagnosed canine neoplasms. It is helpful to classify lymphoma anatomically, because these forms each have common histories and clinical signs. Anatomic forms include multicentric, alimentary, mediastinal, and cutaneous forms. Because lymphoma is a systemic disease, systemic chemotherapy is the most appropriate modality for its treatment. Lymphoma cells are sensitive to chemotherapy, and complete remission rates are high when these patients are treated with conventional chemotherapy. Treated dogs maintain a good quality of life, and treatment can provide resolution of many presenting signs and abnormalities. The fundamental goals of chemotherapy are to induce a durable remission and to re-induce a remission after one or more relapses. Other therapies, such as surgery and radiation therapy, are appropriate in certain situations. Prognostic factors will also be summarized.     

Accuracy of a portable blood gas analyzer incorporating optodes for canine blood

The accuracy of a portable blood gas analyzer (OPTI 1) was evaluated using canine blood and aqueous control solutions. Sixty-four arterial blood samples were collected from 11 anesthetized dogs and were analyzed for pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) partial pressure of oxygen (PO2), and bicarbonate concentration ([HCO3-]) values by the OPTI 1 and a conventional blood gas analyzer (GASTAT 3). The conventional analyzer was considered as a standard against which the OPTI 1 was evaluated. Comparison of OPTI 1 results with those of GASTAT 3 by linear regression analysis revealed a high degree of correlation with the GASTAT 3 (r = .90-.91). The mean +/- SD of the differences between OPTI 1 and GASTAT 3 values was -0.008 +/- 0.017 for pH, -0.88 +/- 3.33 mm Hg for PCO2, 3.71 +/- 6.98 mm Hg for PO2, and -0.34 +/- 1.45 mEq/L for [HCO3-]. No statistically significant difference was found between the OPTI 1 and the GASTAT 3. Agreement between these 2 methods is within clinically acceptable ranges for pH, PCO2, PO2, and [HCO3-]. The coefficients of variation for measured pH, PCO2, and PO2 values of 3 aqueous control solutions (acidic, normal, and alkalotic) analyzed by the OPTI 1 ranged from 0.047 to 0.072% for pH, 0.78 to 1.81% for PCO2, and 0.73 to 2.77% for PO2. The OPTI 1 is concluded to provide canine blood gas analysis with an accuracy that is comparable with that of conventional benchtop blood gas analyzers.