共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 484 毫秒
1.
2.
基于GIS的江西省林权证管理信息系统 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
在对林权证管理信息系统需求进行初步分析的基础上,确定了系统结构,并提出了基于ESRI的ActiveX地图控件MapObjects进行系统开发的方式. 相似文献
3.
阐述了在林权证管理信息系统开发中软件工程理论的具体实现,采用原型法与面向对象方法互为补充消除软件开发中的一些常见问题。 相似文献
4.
5.
为了解决景东彝族自治县深化集体林权制度主体改革中林权证打印工作时间紧、任务重、技术力量不足的困难,应用Visual FoxPro 6.0软件开发了数据采集系统,该采集系统的应用具有以下优点:①林权证管理信息系统数据录入速度快,质量高,每个林权证打印技术员每天可完成1440宗林地数据的采集;②节省人力、资金和时间,该新技术的应用可提高75%的工作效率。③林权证打印质量高,出错率几乎为零,受到广大林改技术员的一致好评。 相似文献
6.
林权证管理信息系统中需求分析的探讨 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
王子晓 《中南林业调查规划》2002,21(3):48-49,61
通过剖析林权证管理信息系统中需求分析过程,阐明需求分析的重要性及过程方法。 相似文献
7.
退耕还林与森林经营管理 总被引:6,自引:1,他引:5
在总结退耕还林工程具有建设任务重、政策性强、参与部门多、操作复杂、涉及面广5个显著特点的基础上,分析了在退耕还林工程实施管理过程中与森林经营管理密切相关的规划布局、作业设计、检查验收、林权证发放、抚育管护、采伐利用、效益监测、档案管理8个环节,提出了加强基础数据工作,完善检查验收方法,开发和推广应用工程管理信息系统,研究采伐利用政策和技术4条提高退耕还林经营管理水平的具体建议。 相似文献
8.
9.
婺城区山林纠纷的现状与对策 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
婺城区山林纠纷主要原因是林权证核发不规范、无林权证以及林权证管理重视不够,针对问题提出了加强完善林权证管理措施以及预防和处理山林纠纷的对策。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
13.
Approach Analyses to Promote Sustainable Forest Management with Forest Certification in China 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
ZHAO Jie LU Wenming . Research Institute of Forestry Policy Information Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing P. R. China . International Cooperation Division P. R. China 《中国林业科技(英文版)》2008,(3):25-31
The paper was based on the current development status of forest certification to analyze the basic characteristics of forest certification from the development point of view in terms of origin, development, main drivers and impacts, and then conducted the approach analysis to promote sustainable forest management with forest certification in China. The result showed that China shall establish her own forest certification scheme, with the focus on the improvement of forest sustainable management concept thro... 相似文献
14.
以森林认证促进我国森林可持续经营的途径分析 总被引:2,自引:2,他引:0
在概括森林认证发展现状的基础上, 从森林认证的发生、发展、主要推动力及其产生的影响等方面分析了森林认证的基本特征, 进而分析了在我国通过开展森林认证促进森林可持续经营的途径。 相似文献
15.
16.
The number of Sustainable Green Ecosystem Council (SGEC) certified forests in Japan has increased in recent years. As such it is important to understand forest management certification within the context of corrective action requests (CARs) to assess sustainable forest management. This study analyzes trends in CARs issued through evaluations of SGEC certified forests in Japan as a function of certification body, forest zone, size of forest holdings, and forest ownership type. This study examined 86 certified forests in Japan using data from summary evaluations published by SGEC certification bodies in 2014. Forests in the northern zone tend to have more CARs assigned, as did larger forests and communally owned forests. For managers interested in maintaining sustainable forests, the findings suggest that they should focus on improving the following indicators: “training and instruction, such as the safety for forestry workers” (indicator 5.3), “to evaluate forest practices against the original plan and to assess their impacts, with proper monitoring” (indicator 7.1), “explicit and management policy of the important elements in the conservation of biological diversity”(indicator 2.2) and “protection of threatened species” (indicator 2.3). The results from this study suggest that certification bodies have different priorities in their certification assessments, as indicated by the varying number and types of CARs assigned. However, the findings also indicate that the factors affecting the assessment results may not be only the certification body issuing the assessments but also the forest zone, forest ownership type, and size of forest holdings. 相似文献
17.