Irrigation and tillage effects on root development,water use and yield of wheat on coarse textured soils

Summary Rapid drying of surface layers of coarse-textured soils early in the growth season increases soil strength and restricts root growth. This constraint on root growth may be countered by deep tillage and/or early irrigation. We investigated tillage and irrigation effects on root growth, water use, dry matter and grain yield of wheat on loamy sand and sandy loam soils for three years. Treatments included all combinations of two tillage systems i) conventional tillage (CT) — stirring the soil to 10 cm depth, ii) deep tillage (DT) — subsoiling with a single-tine chisel down to 35–40 cm, 40 cm apart followed by CT; and four irrigation regimes, i) I₀ — no post-seeding irrigation, ii) I₁ — 50 mm irrigation 30 days after seeding (DAS), iii) I₂ — 50 mm irrigation 30 DAS and subsequent irrigations of 75 mm each when net evaporation from USWB class A open pan (PAN-E) since previous irrigation accumulated to 82 mm, and iv) I₃ — same as in I² but irrigation applied when PAN-E accumulated to 62 mm. The crop of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. HD 2329) was fertilized with 20kg P, 10kg K and 5kg Zn ha^–1 at seeding. The rate of nitrogen fertilization was 60 kg ha^–1 in the unirrigated and 120 kg ha^–1 in the irrigated treatments. Tillage decreased soil strength and so did the early post-seeding irrigation. Both deep tillage and early irrigation shortened the time needed for the root system to reach a specified depth. Subsequent wetting through rain/irrigation reduced the rate of root penetration down the profile and also negated deep tillage effects on rooting depth. However, tillage/irrigation increased root length density in the rooted profile even in a wet year. Better rooting resulted in greater profile water depletion, more favourable plant water status and higher dry matter and grain yields. In a dry year, the wheat in the DT plots used 46 mm more water, remained 3.3 °C cooler at grain-fill and yielded 68% more grain than in CT when unirrigated and grown in the loamy sand. Early irrigation also increased profile water depletion, more so in CT than DT. Averaged over three years, grain yield in DT was 12 and 9% higher than in CT on loamy sand and sandy loam, respectively. Benefits of DT decreased with increase in rainfall and irrigation. Irrigation significantly increased grain yield on both soils, but the response was greatly influenced by soil type, tillage system and year. The study shows that soil related constraints on root growth may be alleviated through deep tillage and/or early irrigation.     

The effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on rapeseed (Brassica napus) production in South-Eastern Australia

Summary A field trial was conducted to determine the response of rapeseed (Brassica napus cv. Marnoo) to two irrigation treatments and six nitrogen fertilizer treatments. Response to nitrogen was greater with than without irrigation. Oil content was increased with irrigation but decreased under increasing nitrogen application, and was inversely related to seed nitrogen concentration. Oil yields averaged 1,168 kg ha^–1 under irrigated treatments compared with 835 kg ha^–1 under rainfed treatments. Maximum oil yield (approx. 1,557 kg ha^–1) was obtained from the irrigated treatment fertilized with 100 kg N ha^–1 applied at sowing.     

Response of cotton to different soil water deficits on clay soils

Summary Cotton was grown under sprinkler irrigation on a silty clay soil at Keiser, Arkansas, for the 1987, 1988 and 1989 growing seasons. Irrigation treatments consisted of maximum soil water deficits (SWD) of 25, 50 and 75 mm and a nonirrigated control. While the irrigated treatments were significantly different from the control for plant height and total seedcotton yield, significant differences among the three irrigated treatments were only observed for plant height. Yields were significantly lower in 1989 than in the other two years of the study, due in part to later planting. The 3-year averages for total seedcotton yield were 3280 and 2870 kg ha^–1 for irrigated and nonirrigated, respectively, for an average increase corresponding to irrigation of 416 kg ha^–1 or 14.5% of the nonirrigated yield. The maximum increase was observed in 1988 as 602 kg ha^–1 or 20.6% of the nonirrigated yield for that year. The 75 mm allowable SWD was the most efficient treatment and resulted in a 3-year average of 3.85 kg ha^–1 additional seedcotton (above the nonirrigated) harvested for each 1 mm of irrigation applied. Maintaining the SWD below a 75 mm maximum required an average of four irrigations and 110 mm of irrigation water per year.     

Timing of limited irrigation and N-injection for grain sorghum

When subsurface irrigation sources are lacking in humid and subhumid regions, high yearly precipitation may allow for storage of surface water in farm ponds and lakes for irrigation. Irrigation at selected growth stages may avoid critical stress for crops with some drought tolerance, such as grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Because grain sorghum is responsive to N, injecting fertilizer N through the irrigation system also may improve production. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of timing of limited-amount irrigation and N fertigation on grain sorghum yield; yield components; grain N content; and N uptake at the 9-leaf, boot, and soft dough stages. The experiment was conducted from 1984 to 1986 on a Parsons silt loam (fine, mixed, thermic, Mollic Albaqualf). The experiment was designed as a 6 × 2 factorial plus two reference treatments. Six timings for irrigation were targeted at the 9-leaf (9L), boot (B), soft dough (SD), 9L-B, 9L-SD, and B-SD growth stages. N application systems were either 112 kg N ha^–1 surface-banded preplant or 56 kg N ha^-1 preplant and 56 kg N ha^–1 injected through the irrigation at a rate of 28 kg N ha^–1 per 2.5 cm of irrigation. Two reference treatments included were one receiving N but no irrigation and one receiving neither N nor irrigation. In 1984, irrigation generally increased grain sorghum yield by nearly 1 Mg ha^–1. However, yield was not affected by selection of irrigation timing, N application method, or the interaction of the two factors. This was partly because early irrigations increased kernels/head, whereas later irrigations increased kernel weight. Above average rainfall during the growing season, especially just prior to the 9-leaf, boot, and soft dough growth stages, resulted in no irrigations in 1985. In 1986, yield was increased by early (9-leaf) irrigations as compared to soft dough irrigations. Early irrigations resulted in higher kernels/head; however, rainfall after the soft dough irrigation may have masked any treatment effect on kernel weight. As in 1984, N application method did not affect grain sorghum yields, even though yield was reduced to less than 3 Mg ha^–1 with no N nor irrigation. In both 1984 and 1986, N uptake at succeeding growth stages appeared to respond to irrigations made at previous growth stages. Injecting half of the fertilizer N through the irrigation system did not affect N uptake compared to applying all N preplant. The lack of response to fertigation may be related to the low leaching potential of the soil used in this study.Contribution No. 92-606-J, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station     

Effect of small irrigation amounts on the yield of wheat

Yields of dryland crops are governed by the moisture in the soil profile at seeding and by rainfall during the growing season. Occasionally limited amounts of water may also be available for irrigation. Field experiments were conducted over a period of 4 years on loamy sand and 3 years on sandy loam to study the effects of pre-seeding, post-seeding and split application of limited amounts of water on root growth, water use, dry matter accumulation and grain yield of wheat. This article reports the treatment effects on dry matter accumulation and grain yield.Early season water stress decreased the rate of dry matter accumulation. Grain yield responded significantly to irrigation 30 days after seeding irrespective of the amount of water, year and soil type. Yield with post-seeding irrigation averaged 3518 kg ha^?1 against 2317 kg ha^?1 for unirrigated control in loamy sand and 4440 kg ha^?1 against 3391 kg ha^?1 in sandy loam. The increase in yield was manifested by a significant increase in the number of effective tillers per m row length, number of grains per ear and thousand grain weight.     

Water use efficiency of irrigated wheat in the Tarai region of India

Experiments were conducted during the winter seasons of 1983–1984 and 1984–1985 to identify suitable irrigation regimes s for wheat grown after rice in soils with naturally fluctuating shallow water table (SWT) at a depth of 0.4 to 0.9 m and medium water table (MWT) at a depth of 0.8 to 1.3 m. Based on physiological stages, the crop was subjected to six irrigation regimes viz., rainfed (I₀); irrigation only at crown root initiation (I₁); at only crown root initiation and milk (I₂); at crown root initiation, maximum tillering and milk (I₃); at crown root initiation, maximum tillering, flowering and milk (I₄); and at crown root initiation, maximum tillering, flowering milk and dough (I₅). Tube-well water with an EC <0.4 dsm^–1 was used for irrigation. Based on 166 mm effective precipitation during the cropping season, 1983–1984 was designated as a wet year and 1984–1985 with 51 mm as a dry year. The change in profile soil water content W (depletion) in the wet year was less (23%) under SWT and 10% under MWT as compared to the dry year. The ground water contribution (GWC) to evapotranspiration (ET) was 58% under SWT and 42% under MWT conditions in both the years. The GWC in the wet year was 20% under SWT and 23% under MWT. Of the total net water use (NWU), about 85% was ET and 15% drainage losses. The NWU was highest (641 and 586 mm) in I₅ under SWT and MWT conditions, respectively, but not the yield (5069 kg ha^–1). Compared to I₅, NWU in I₂ treatment decreased by 10% in the wet and 25% in the dry year. A similar trend was observed in the I₃ treatment under MWT condition. However, there was no statistically significant difference between yields of the I₁ to I₅ treatments of either water table depth during the wet year. This was also true during the dry year for the I₂ to I₅ treatments. Under SWT, in I₂, the grain yield was 5130 kg ha^–1 and under I₃ regime, 5200 kg ha^–1. Under MWT in I₃, the yield was 5188 kg ha^–1 and under I₄ regime, 5218 kg ha^–1. Thus it appears that in the Tarai region where the water table remains shallow (<0.9 m) and medium (<1.3 m) for most of the wheat growing season applications of more than 120 and 180 mm irrigation under SWT and MWT conditions, respectively were not necessary. Irrigation given only at crown root initiation and milk stages under shallow water table conditions, and at crown root initiation, maximum tillering and milk stages under medium water table conditions, appears to be as effective as frequent irrigations.     

Barley yield response to irrigation and potential profits in the Texas High Plains

Summary Irrigated winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) can be a profitable alternative to some low profit major crops in the Texas High Plains. A six-year evaluation of yield response related to total spring irrigation water, applied by surface methods (furrow), and seasonal precipitation resulted in a multivariate function explaining 74% of the yield variation. Predicted yields varied from a low of 3.69 Mg ha^–1 to a maximum 6.18 Mg ha^–1 with 0 and 389 mm, respectively, based on average monthly precipitation quantities. Precipitation is skewed to less than average in th semi-arid Texas High Plains. Using modal precipitation amounts of 40% of average precipitation, yield estimates were reduced to 2.29 Mg ha^–1 with zero spring irrigation and to 5.63 Mg ha^–1 at the peak with 450 mm. A second multivariate yield response function related to alternative timings of single and multiple spring irrigations explained 76% of the variation in yields. Among all combinations of 1, 2, 3, and 4 spring irrigations, irrigation water-use efficiency was estimated to be highest with one application at the boot stage of development. All other single and combinations of multiple irrigations resulted in lower water-use efficiencies. A comparison of enterprise budgets of four irrigation timing alternatives and levels of application indicated highest profit over variable costs, $ 287 ha^–1, was attained by applying a total of 307 mm in three spring applications at the boot, head, and milk stages. A lower level of 217 mm applied at boot and milk stages was $ 12 ha^–1 less profitable and a higher level of 425 mm was $ 24 ha^–1 less profitable. When fixed costs of irrigation facilities, land, and machinery were considered, returns to management and risk were highest, $ 101 ha^–1, with 217 mm. Using 40% of average precipitation, profits were reduced $ 65 ha^–1 with 217 mm and $ 69 ha^–1 with 307 mm spring irrigation levels.Respectively, agricultural economist, research scientist, and research associate, Texas Agr. Exp. Station, Amarillo, Texas; Emeritus Extension agronomist, Texas Agr. Ext. Service, Amarillo, Texas; agricultural engineer, Texas Agr. Exp. Station, Amarillo, Texas     

Yield and water-production functions of two durum wheat cultivars grown under different irrigation and nitrogen regimes

Wheat (Triticum durum L.) yields in the semi-arid regions are limited by inadequate water supply late in the cropping season. Planning suitable irrigation strategy and nitrogen fertilization with the appropriate crop phenology will produce optimum grain yields. A 3-year experiment was conducted on deep, fairly drained clay soil, at Tal Amara Research Station in the central Bekaa Valley of Lebanon to investigate the response of durum wheat to supplemental irrigation (IRR) and nitrogen rate (NR). Three water supply levels (rainfed and two treatments irrigated at half and full soil water deficit) were coupled with three N fertilization rates (100, 150 and 200 kg N ha⁻¹) and two cultivars (Waha and Haurani) under the same cropping practices (sowing date, seeding rate, row space and seeding depth). Averaged across N treatments and years, rainfed treatment yielded 3.49 Mg ha⁻¹ and it was 25% and 28% less than half and full irrigation treatments, respectively, for Waha, while for Haurani the rainfed treatment yielded 3.21 Mg ha⁻¹, and it was 18% and 22% less than half and full irrigation, respectively. On the other hand, N fertilization of 150 and 200 kg N ha⁻¹ increased grain yield in Waha by 12% and 16%, respectively, in comparison with N fertilization of 100 kg N ha⁻¹, while for cultivar Haurani the increases were 24% and 38%, respectively. Regardless of cultivar, results showed that supplemental irrigation significantly increased grain number per square meter and grain weight with respect to the rainfed treatment, while nitrogen fertilization was observed to have significant effects only on grain number per square meter. Moreover, results showed that grain yield for cultivar Haurani was less affected by supplemental irrigation and more affected by nitrogen fertilization than cultivar Waha in all years. However, cultivar effects were of lower magnitude compared with those of irrigation and nitrogen. We conclude that optimum yield was produced for both cultivars at 50% of soil water deficit as supplemental irrigation and N rate of 150 kg N ha⁻¹. However, Harvest index (HI) and water use efficiency (WUE) in both cultivars were not significantly affected neither by supplemental irrigation nor by nitrogen rate. Evapotranspiration (ET) of rainfed wheat ranged from 300 to 400 mm, while irrigated wheat had seasonal ET ranging from 450 to 650 mm. On the other hand, irrigation treatments significantly affected ET after normalizing for vapor pressure deficit (ET/VPD) during the growing season. Supplemental irrigation at 50% and 100% of soil water deficit had approximately 26 and 52 mm mbar⁻¹ more ET/VPD, respectively, than those grown under rainfed conditions.     

Varietal differences in the response of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) to irrigation strategies in a semi-arid region of Algeria

The response of three durum wheat cultivars (C: Chen’s, V: Vitron, W: Waha) to irrigation was studied during 4 years in semi-arid Algeria (Chlef). The four treatments were NI (unirrigated), EI (early irrigation, up to heading), LI (late irrigation, from heading) and FI (full irrigation, over the entire season). FI increased rainfed grain yield (1,300 kg ha⁻¹) by 270%, EI by 107%, and LI by 67%. The variety × irrigation interaction was significant each year. Under irrigation, cv. Vitron was generally the most productive cultivar while in rainfed conditions cv. Waha always resulted in the highest grain yield. Grain yield increased exponentially with seasonal evapotranspiration (r ² = 0.741) and harvest index (r ² = 0.873). Water use efficiency for grain ranged from 4.6–5.3 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ (NI) to 9.6–10.8 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ (FI) as a function of cultivar and irrigation, cv. Vitron and cv. Waha (full irrigation) and cv. Waha (rainfed) being the most efficient cultivars. According to the evaporation pan method, the seasonal crop coefficient (K _c) values for the three cultivars were 0.64 (V), 0.62 (W) and 0.54 (C). The corresponding peak K _c values were 1.0, 0.97 and 0.89, respectively. K _c was closely related to leaf area index (LAI) and specific logarithmic relationships were calculated for each cultivar. Irrigation scheduling should be adapted to the type of cultivar in relation to its potential yield and LAI development pattern.     

The fate of nitrogen applied to sugarcane by trickle irrigation

Fertigation can be a more efficient means of applying crop nutrients, particularly nitrogen (N), so that nutrient application rates can be reduced in fertigated crops. However, there is little information on the extent of the possible reduction in N application rate for fertigated sugarcane, one of the major row crops grown under trickle irrigation, nor the fate of N in fertigated sugarcane systems if N application rates are not reduced. An experiment was established to determine the response of cane and sugar production to different N rates (0–240 kg ha^–1 year^–1) spanning that recommended for conventional irrigation systems (160 kg ha^–1 year^–1). As well as yield, N removed in the crop and changes in soil mineral N were determined annually for four crops (a plant and three ratoon crops). ¹⁵N values were also measured in selected treatments at selected times to assess possible N inputs to the experiment via biological N fixation (BFN). Yields of cane and sugar responded to application of N fertiliser in the three ratoon crops, but they were not significantly increased by applying more than 80 kg ha^–1 of N. There were no N responses in the plant crop, as there was >200 kg ha^–1 of soil mineral N (SMN) to 2 m depth at the site prior to planting, and much of this SMN was depleted in the treatment receiving no N. There was no evidence of N input from BFN in the experiment. During the 4-year study period, net removal of N from the treatment with no applied N totalled 207 kg ha^–1. When 80 or 120 kg ha^–1 year^–1 of N was applied to ratoon crops, outputs of N from the harvested crop approximately balanced inputs from fertiliser and depletion of SMN during the experiment. Inputs clearly exceeded output at higher N application rates. Assuming that the net removal of N from the treatment with no applied N was the same as the net mineralisation of N from soil organic matter in all treatments in the experiment, 204–639 kg ha^–1 of N was unaccounted for in the treatments with applied N over the duration of the experiment. While some of this N (e.g. 45 kg ha^–1) may have resulted in small (and undetectable) increases in total soil N, much of it would have been lost to the environment. We suggest that the high soil water contents maintained with daily application of irrigation water through the trickle system promotes mineralisation of soil organic matter and hence losses of N to the environment. Thus, particular care is required to avoid over-application of N in fertigated sugarcane.Communicated by K. Bristow     

Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment VII. Evaluation of irrigation strategies for cotton

Summary Empirical functions to predict the nitrogen uptake, increase in LAI and minimum leaf water potential (LWP) of cotton were incorporated into a water balance model for the Namoi Valley, N.S.W. A function was then developed to describe the lint yield of irrigated cotton as a function of water stress days at 4 stages of development, total nitrogen uptake and days of waterlogging. A water stress day was defined as predicted minimum leaf water potential less than -1.8 MPa up to 90 days after sowing and -2.4 MPa there-after; stress reduced yield by up to 40 kg lint ha^–1 d^–1 with greatest sensitivity at 81–140 days after sowing and when N uptake was highest. Nitrogen uptake was reduced by 0.98 kg per ha and yield reduced by 33.2 kg lint ha^–1 for each day of waterlogging. The model was used to evaluate various irrigation strategies by simulating production of cotton from historical rainfall data. With a water supply from off farm storage, net returns ($ M1^–1) were maximized by allocating 7 Ml ha^–1 of crop. The optimum practice was not to irrigate until 60 days from sowing and until the deficit in the root zone reached 50%. When the supply of water was less than 7 Ml ha^–1 there was no advantage in either delaying the start of irrigation or irrigating at a greater deficit; it was economically more rational to reduce the area shown or, if already sown, to irrigate part with 6 Ml ha^–1 and leave the rest as a raingrown crop. Irrigation decisions are compromises between reducing the risk of water stress and increasing the risk of waterlogging. The simulation showed that there is no single set of practices that is always best in every season; in a number of seasons practices other than those which on average are best, give better results.     

Evaluation on the irrigation and fertilization management practices under the application of treated sewage water in Beijing, China

Irrigation and fertilization management practices play important roles in crop production. In this paper, the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) was used to evaluate the irrigation and fertilization management practices for a winter wheat–summer corn double cropping system in Beijing, China under the irrigation with treated sewage water (TSW). A carefully designed experiment was carried out at an experimental station in Beijing area from 2001 to 2003 with four irrigation treatments. The hydrologic, nitrogen and crop growth components of RZWQM were calibrated by using the dataset of one treatment. The datasets of other three treatments were used to validate the model performance. Most predicted soil water contents were within ±1 standard deviation (S.D.) of the measured data. The relative errors (RE) of grain yield predictions were within the range of −26.8% to 18.5%, whereas the REs of biomass predictions were between −38% and 14%. The grain nitrogen (N) uptake and biomass N uptake were predicted with the RE values ranging from −13.9% to 14.7%, and from −11.1% to 29.8%, respectively. These results showed that the model was able to simulate the double cropping system variables under different irrigation and fertilization conditions with reasonable accuracy. Application of RZWQM in the growing season of 2001–2002 indicated that the best irrigation management practice was no irrigation for summer corn, three 83 mm irrigations each for pre-sowing, jointing and heading stages of winter wheat, respectively. And the best nitrogen application management practice was 120 kg N ha⁻¹ for summer corn and 110 kg N ha⁻¹ for winter wheat, respectively, under the irrigation with TSW. We also obtained the alternative irrigation management practices for the hydrologic years of 75%, 50% and 25%, respectively, in Beijing area under the conditions of irrigation with TSW and the optimal nitrogen application.     

Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment

Summary A four year study examined the effect of irrigating at various water deficits at different times in the growing season, in combination with a range of nitrogen fertilizer rates, on the growth, yield and quality of cotton. The major effect of irrigation treatment on growth was to increase leaf area and plant size; net assimilation rate in the vegetative phase was not affected by irrigation treatment. The initial rate of boll setting was slightly faster in low nitrogen and less frequent irrigation treatments, but by day 180 (immediately prior to defoliation), all treatments had 60% of total dry weight as bolls and 7% as leaf. The best irrigation strategy varied from year to year due to the variable rainfall pattern. Irrigation when 80% of the available soil moisture had been depleted in the first half of the season only decreased total lint yield by up to 12% in two of the four seasons. During the second half of the season the 80% level of depletion decreased yield by an average of 15% but gave an earlier crop. Yield was reduced by up to 17% if irrigation at 40–60% of available moisture depletion in the first half of the season was followed by irrigation at 80% of available moisture depletion in the second half of the season. A rainfed treatment yielded from 16 to 43% less than the heaviest yielding irrigation treatment. After irrigation there was evidence of poor aeration in the soil which was most severe and lasted the longest at 30 cm depth. Heaviest yields were obtained with 100–150 kgN ha^–1, except in rainfed treatments where 0–50 kgN ha^–1 was sufficient. Irrigation at only 40% of available moisture depletion decreased nitrogen uptake in all seasons. Treatment effects on fibre quality in these experiments were small and variable. Nitrogen fertilizer generally increased length and strength but decreased micronaire. Stress during boll filling decreased micronaire and length in two of the four seasons.     

The growth and nitrogen economy of rice under sprinkler and flood irrigation in South East Australia

Summary Dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L., cv. Calrose) was subjected to 4 irrigation treatments — continuous flood (CF) and sprinkler irrigation at frequencies of one (S1 W), two (S2W) and three (S3W) applications per week — commencing 37 d after 50% emergence (DAE). The amount of water applied was calculated to replace water lost by pan evaporation. Urea (120 kg N ha^–1) was applied in a 1:1 split 36 and 84 DAE, and there were also unfertilized controls for each irrigation treatment. Amounts of nitrate (NO ₃ ^– ) in the soil were very low throughout the growing season in all treatments, despite regular periods of draining which lasted for up to 7 d in SlW. In all irrigation treatments, the majority of the fertilizer nitrogen (N) was located in the top 20 mm of soil. After each application of fertilizer, levels of mineral N in CF declined rapidly, while levels in S3W and S1W remained high for 1–2 weeks longer. The poor growth of sprinkler-irrigated rice was not due to lower amounts of mineral N in the soil. The greater persistence of fertilizer N in the sprinkler-irrigated treatments was probably due to reduced root activity near the soil surface because of frequent periods of soil drying in between irrigations. Net mineralization of soil N in the unfertilized sprinkler-irrigated treatments was reduced by about half compared with CF.On average, the quantity of water applied (1.2–1.4 × EP) to the sprinkler-irrigated treatments appeared to be sufficient to meet the evapotranspiration demands of the crop, except possibly around flowering time. However, the plants may have suffered from moisture stress in between irrigations. Soil matric potential data at 100 mm suggested little water stress in the sprinkler-irrigated treatments during the vegetative stage, consistent with the similar tiller and panicle densities in all irrigation treatments. However, the crop was stunted and yellow and leaf rolling was observed in the sprinkler-irrigated treatments during this period. Soil matric potential data at 100 mm indicated considerable water stress in S1W beyond the commencement of anthesis, and in S2W during grain filling, consistent with the reduced floret fertility and grain weight in those treatments.     

A comparison between the gross energy requirements of different irrigation systems in Israel

Summary The energy requirements for manufacturing irrigation equipment were evaluated from a survey of a number of factories and workshops in Israel.Based on the results obtained and the life span of the components, the annual amortization of energy by high-pressure (overhead sprinklers), medium-pressure (undertree sprinklers and sprayers) and low-pressure (drip lines) irrigation systems was calculated for citrus orchards and cotton crops as irrigated in Israel. For citrus orchards a low-pressure sprayer system amortized 1.5 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 more energy than a medium-pressure undertree sprinkler system, and 2.7 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 more than a high-pressure, overhead sprinkler system. For irrigating a cotton crop, the low-pressure drip system used 6.8 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 more embodied energy than the movable, high-pressure overhead sprinkler system.The annual energy invested in irrigation water conveyance through the National Water Carrier, at the current hydraulic pressure of 500 kPa at the farm gate, varies for a cotton crop from 20 to 45 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 in the northern region and from 70 to 215 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 in the southern region of Israel, when irrigated with 4,050 m³ ha^–1. For a citrus orchard this energy input varies from 60 to 75 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 in the central region and from 120 to 375 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 in the southern regions, when irrigated with 7,200 m³ ha^–1. For obtaining the same yield in the south as in the north, the energy input for water conveyance has to be increased by 12% in the case of a cotton crop and by 7% in the case of a citrus orchard. Thus, in the north the annual energy amortization of a dripline irrigation system amounts to one third of that expended on water conveyance but in the south amounts to one-eighteenth or less, indicating the large regional dependency of energy inputs for irrigation.Calculations show that the reduction in energy requirement for water conveyance needed by irrigation systems operating at lower pressures compensates for their higher energy losses in system amortization. For example, in citrus irrigation the substitution of medium-pressure undertree sprinkler systems for high-pressure overhead sprinkler systems was calculated to save 8% of the total energy expenditure for water conveyance to the farm gate. This would amount to a saving of 7 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 for citrus in the central region and of 8 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 in the south. For cotton the substitution of low pressure dripline systems for high-pressure overhead sprinkler systems could save 16% of the total energy expenditure for pressurized water conveyance. This would amount to a saving of 8 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 in the northern region increasing to 10 GJ ha^–1 y^–1 in the south, taking into account a higher irrigation water requirement.Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel. No. 1589-E, 1985 series     

The effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on rapeseed (Brassica napes) production in South-Eastern Australia

Summary A field trial was conducted to determine the response of rapeseed (Brassica napus cv. Marnoo) to two irrigation treatments and six nitrogen fertilizer treatments. Dry matter accumulation, leaf area development and seed yield were measured. The dry matter and seed yield response to applied nitrogen was greater under irrigated compared to rainfed conditions. Maximum seed yield (approx. 3.8 t ha^–1) was obtained from the irrigated treatment receiving 100 kg N ha^–1 applied at sowing. This high rate of N application at sowing led to more rapid leaf area development and higher maximum LAI compared to treatments supplied with split application of the same amount of N at sowing and rosette stages. Greater partitioning of dry matter into the leaf component and higher specific leaf areas under the higher N regime were largely responsible for this increase. Higher maximum LAI's were associated with greater numbers of pods per plant, which combined with longer leaf area duration led to higher final seed yields.     

Effect of treated effluent irrigation and nitrogen on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat

Yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of wheat was investigated under field conditions using two types of irrigation waters with and without nitrogen on a sandy-loam to loamy-sand soil during 1992–1993 and 1993–1994. Depending upon different nitrogen treatments, the mean crop yield ranges in 1992–1993 were: grain yield 6.19–6.87 Mg ha⁻ and biomass 15.41–16.34 Mg ha⁻¹ receiving treated effluent. The mean crop yield ranges in 1993–1994 were: grain yield 0.46–3.23 Mg ha⁻¹ (well water) and 5.20–6.54 Mg ha⁻¹ (treated effluent); and biomass 1.84–10.80 Mg ha⁻¹ (well water), and 16.00–19.29 Mg ha⁻¹ (treated effluent). The NUE for grain yield in 1992–1993 was between 16.70–50.23 kg kg⁻¹ N (well water) and 20.65–91.56 kg kg⁻¹ N (treated effluent). Whereas the NUE in 1993-94, varied between 10.49–32.13 kg grain kg⁻¹ N (well water) and 21.30–72.93 kg grain kg⁻¹ N (treated effluent). The NUE for total biomass in 1992–1993 varied between 46.54–130.32 kg kg⁻¹ N (well water) and 53.66–158.77 kg kg⁻¹ N (treated effluent). Similarly, the NUE in 1993–1994 varied between 35.99–102.1 kg biomass kg⁻¹ N (well water) and 59.27–161.89 kg biomass kg⁻¹ N (treated effluent). A significant decrease in NUE was observed with increasing nitrogen application both for grain and biomass production. In conclusion, a higher grain yield and NUE of wheat crop can be achieved with low application rates of nitrogen if the crop is irrigated with treated effluent containing nitrogen in the range of 20 mg L⁻¹ and above.     

The effects of irrigation regimes and nitrogen rates on some agronomic traits of canola under a semiarid environment

This study was aimed to investigate dual effects of irrigation regimes and N fertilizer rates on some agronomic traits (with emphasis on yield qualitative and quantitative characteristics) and finding optimized irrigation level and N application rate for two canola (Brassic napus L.) cultivars. For this purpose, two variety of canola (Zarfam and Modena), four irrigation regimes including 30%, 45%, 60% and 75% (I1-I4) of maximum allowable depletion (MAD) of available soil water (ASW) and four nitrogen rates (viz. 0, 90, 180 and 270 kg N ha⁻¹ (N1-N4) were involved in Karaj, Iran for two successive years (2007-2008). Our results revealed special fertilizer threshold for each irrigation regime in respect to seed yield. Response rate to fertilizers was ceased in lower fertilizer rates by prolonging irrigation. The response rate showed a decrease of 15.4%, 17.2% and 30.7% in I2, I3 and I4 in comparison with I1, but I2 response to fertilizer ceased in higher N rate as N_critical (189.8 kg N ha⁻¹). This implies that I2 improved response of canola cultivars to N fertilizer, which was accompanied by its higher WUE. Also, all estimated N_criticals for all irrigation levels were higher than the current recommendation of 130 kg N ha⁻¹. This show the capability of increasing canola cultivars yield in study region by reasonable increasing of fertilizer rate (decreasing gap between recommended N rate and estimated values) in advisable irrigation regime (I2). Cultivars tended to respond similarly to irrigation and nitrogen for seed yield in both years, but Zarfam was more efficient than Modena in respect to response to diverse treatments.     

Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on yield,yield components and water use efficiency of barley in Saudi Arabia

Water use efficiency and yield of barley were determined in a field experiment using different irrigation waters with and without nitrogen fertilizer on a sandy to loamy sand soil during 1994–1995 and 1995–1996. Depending upon different fertilizer treatments, the overall mean crop yield ranges for two crop seasons were: greenmatter from 19.48–55.0 Mg ha⁻¹ (well water) and 21.92–66.5 Mg ha⁻¹ (aquaculture effluent); drymatter from 6.86–20.69 Mg ha⁻¹ (well water) and 7.87–20.90 Mg ha⁻¹ (aquaculture effluent); biomass from 4.12–21.31 Mg ha⁻¹ (well water) and 8.10–19.94 Mg ha⁻¹ (aquaculture effluent) and grain yield from 2.12–5.50 Mg ha⁻¹ (well water) and 3.25–7.25 Mg ha⁻¹ (aquaculture effluent). The WUE for grain yield was 3.37–8.74 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ (well water) and 5.17–11.53 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ (aquaculture effluent). The WUE for total biomass ranged between 6.55–33.88 kg⁻¹ ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ (well water) and 12.88–31.70 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ (aquaculture effluent). The WUE for drymatter was 10.91–32.90 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ (well water) and 12.51–33.22 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹ (aquaculture effluent). It was found that grain yield and WUE obtained in T-4 and T-5 irrigated with well water and receiving 75 and 100% nitrogen requirements were comparable with T-4 and T-5 irrigated with aquaculture effluent and receiving 0 and 25% nitrogen requirements. In conclusion, application of 100 to 150 kg N ha⁻¹ for well water and up to 50 kg N ha⁻¹ for aquaculture effluent irrigation containing 40 Mg N l⁻¹ would be sufficient to obtain optimum grain yield and higher WUE of barley in Saudi Arabia.     

Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment

Summary The water use of two soybean cultivars (Bragg and Ruse) was measured for three seasons for a range of irrigation treatments. The seasonal totals of plant and soil evaporation ranged from 450 to 750 mm or from 36 to 64% of class A pan evaporation for the same period. Both cultivars extracted approximately 60% of the total extractable soil water in the top 1.2 m of soil before actual evaporation (Ea) dropped below potential evaporation (Eo). Up to this point the ratio between Ea and class A pan evaporation averaged 0.8. Ruse used water at a faster rate than Bragg but Ruse was not as effective in extracting the deep (below 1.0 m) soil water as Bragg. Water use efficiency (kg seed ha^–1 mm^–1 water) showed a small but general increase with decreasing irrigation water application. Runoff losses varied from zero for non-irrigated Ruse in 1977/78 to 352 mm for frequently-irrigated Bragg in 1976/77, generally increasing with the number of irrigations.