Follicular Development and Ovulation in Sows: Effect of hCG and GnRH Treatment

Follicular growth, chronology of ovulation and embryo morphology were compared in sows ovulating spontaneously and sows, in which the ovulation was attempted induced by hCG or GnRH.Indwelling catheters were placed on day 1 (weaning = day 0) in the ear veins of 18 sows, which were then randomly divided into 3 groups: a control group (N = 6), a group (N = 6) given 750 iu hCG (Physex®) im 76h after weaning (hCG group) and a group (N = 6) given 500 µg GnRH (Fertagyl®) im 76h (N = 3) or 100h after weaning (N = 3) (GnRH group). Follicular diameter and time of ovulation were monitored by ultrasonography every 4h from day 3 until ovulation or development of cysts by means of a sector scanner fitted with a 5.0/7.5 MHz multiangle probe. Heat detection was performed every 8h from day 3 until ovulation. On day 13, the sows were slaughtered, the number of corpora luteae (CL) was counted, and embryos were flushed from the uteri. The control group showed clear heat symptoms, and on day 3, the follicles were typically 3–7 mm and grew up to 7–10 mm over 2 days, where they remained for approximately 24h until ovulation took place 41h ± 9h after first sign of standing heat. The hCG group exhibited no signs of heat, and the follicles only reached 5–8 mm in diameter at time of ovulation, which occurred 40h ± lh after hCG-injection. The GnRH group exhibited inconsistent signs of heat, and the follicles reached a maximum size of 7–12 mm in diameter where they remained for more than 24h. Only 2 sows in this group ovulated within 84–92h after the GnRH injection, and development of bursa cysts and cystic follicles was a common finding. The average number of CL was 18.2 ±5.7 per sow (N = 16, range: 3–27) with no significant difference between the groups. Total embryo recovery was 79 ± 13 % with no significant difference between groups. The embryo diversity calculated as standard deviation of the maximum diameter was higher in the hCG group as compared with the control group.It is concluded that (1) transrectal ultrasonography can be used in sows for accurate assessment of follicular growth and ovulation; (2) the use of hCG results in lack of heat symptoms and reduced follicle size at the time of ovulation when injected 76h after weaning; (3) administration of a single injection of GnRH, if given before the first signs of heat, results in inconsistent heat symptoms and no or late ovulations.     

Decreased follicular size during late lactation caused by treatment with charcoal-treated follicular fluid delays onset of estrus and ovulation after weaning in sows

The weaning to estrus and weaning to ovulation intervals in sows are controlled by ovarian follicular growth after weaning. Longer intervals could be caused by smaller diameter follicles at weaning that take more time to reach a preovulatory size. We addressed this hypothesis by decreasing the diameter of follicular populations before weaning and then measuring follicular development and interval to estrus and ovulation after weaning. The posterior vena cava, cranial to the entry of the ovarian vein, was cathetered for blood sampling and infusion in 20 sows at 12 +/- 1 d after farrowing. Sows were assigned randomly to receive either 30 mL of charcoal-treated follicular fluid (FF, n = 9; a treatment known to decrease serum FSH and follicular diameter) or 30 mL of saline (n = 11) by venous infusion thrice daily (0700, 1500, and 2300 h) for 96 h beginning at 14 +/- 1 d after farrowing. Sows were weaned 48 h after the last infusion. Blood samples were collected for FSH analysis thrice daily beginning on the day of catheterization and continuing until ovulation. Follicular diameter was determined once daily by transrectal ultrasonography. A treatment x time interaction was detected for serum FSH (P < 0.001) and follicular diameter (P < 0.001) because serum FSH and the diameter of follicular populations decreased in FF sows during the infusion period. After the infusion period, serum FSH rebounded in FF sows, and follicles resumed growth but grew at the same rate as those of saline-treated sows, thus failing to achieve equivalent diameters relative to saline-treated sows on a given day after weaning. As a result, sows treated with FF had longer (P < 0.05) weaning to estrus (6.1 +/- 0.4 d) and weaning to ovulation (8.6 +/- 0.5 d) intervals compared with saline-treated sows (4.7 +/- 0.4 d and 7.2 +/- 0.4 d, respectively). We conclude that the diameter of the follicular population at weaning is one factor that controls interval to estrus and ovulation in sows. Small follicles at weaning cannot undergo compensatory growth and require additional time to reach a preovulatory size.     

Peri-oestrus hormone profiles and follicle growth in lactating sows with oestrus induced by intermittent suckling.

This study describes follicle dynamics, endocrine profiles in multiparous sows with lactational oestrus compared with conventionally weaned sows (C). Lactational oestrus was induced by Intermittent Suckling (IS) with separation of sows and piglets for either 12 consecutive hours per day (IS12, n = 14) or twice per day for 6 h per occasion (IS6, n = 13) from day 14 of lactation onwards. Control sows (n = 23) were weaned at day 21 of lactation. Pre-ovulatory follicles (> or =6 mm) were observed in 100% of IS12, 92% of IS6 and 26% of C sows before day 21 of lactation and in the remaining 74% C sows within 7 days after weaning. All sows with pre-ovulatory follicles showed oestrus, but not all sows showed ovulation. Four IS6 sows and one IS12 sow developed cystic follicles of which two IS6 sows partially ovulated. Follicle growth, ovulation rate and time of ovulation were similar. E(2) levels tended to be higher in IS sows (p = 0.06), the pre-ovulatory LH surge tended to be lower in IS12 (5.1 +/- 1.7 ng/ml) than in C sows (8.4 +/- 5.0 ng/ml; p = 0.08) and P(4) levels were lower in IS12 and IS6 than in C sows (at 75 h after ovulation: 8.8 +/- 2.4 ng/ml vs 7.0 +/- 1.4 ng/ml vs 17.1 +/- 4.4 ng/ml; p < 0.01). In conclusion, sows with lactational oestrus induced by IS are similar to weaned sows in the timing of oestrus, early follicle development and ovulation rates, but the pre-ovulatory LH surge and post-ovulatory P(4) increase are lower.     

人绒毛膜促性腺激素对母驴促排卵效果的研究

[目的]研究人绒毛膜促性腺激素（human chorionic gonadotropin,hCG）对母驴卵泡发育、排卵率、受胎率以及血清生殖激素水平的影响。[方法]选择优势卵泡直径在30~35 mm以及大于35 mm的母驴各30头,不同优势卵泡直径的母驴群体分别设置1个500 IU/头hCG处理组（n=10）、1个1 000 IU/头hCG处理组（n=10）、1个不接受hCG处理的对照组（n=10）。采用肌肉注射方法对各组母驴进行hCG处理。每隔24 h进行1次B超检查,观察各组母驴卵泡发育情况,测量卵泡直径;记录各组发生排卵的母驴数量,计算排卵率。对各组母驴进行人工输精,输精后第18天进行孕检,记录各组受胎母驴头数,计算各组受胎率。于hCG处理后0、24、48、72 h分别测定各组母驴血清中雌二醇（estradiol,E₂）和孕酮（progesterone,PROG）水平。[结果]2个群体母驴的卵泡直径随hCG注射剂量的增加而增大;优势卵泡直径大于35 mm的母驴群体中,肌肉注射hCG的2个组在处理后24 h内均出现排卵,而对照组母驴没有排卵;优势卵泡直径不同的2个母驴群体,在hCG处理48 h后排卵母驴数和排卵率与对照组相比均有所提高,其中,hCG处理后72 h,优势卵泡直径大于35 mm的母驴群体中,1 000 IU/头 hCG处理组的排卵率达到100%。2个母驴群体中,接受hCG处理的母驴,受胎率均高于对照,并且随hCG剂量的增加,受胎率有所提高;优势卵泡直径大于35 mm的母驴群体中,1 000 IU/头 hCG处理组的受胎率达到50%。2个母驴群体中,1 000 IU/头处理组在hCG处理后24 h的血清E₂浓度均较0 h时有较大幅度的提升,在0~72 h内血清PROG浓度的总体提升幅度较大。[结论]hCG处理可提高母驴的排卵率、受胎率以及血清中E₂和PROG水平,1 000 IU/头剂量的效果更好。     

Impact of Exogenous ACTH During Pro-Oestrus on Endocrine Profile and Oestrous Cycle Characteristics in Sows

Sows housed in freely moving groups have elevated cortisol levels until the rank order is established, which takes place within approximately 48 h. The aim of this investigation was to study the effect of repeated administration of synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH; Synacthen Depot), during the follicular phase (pro-oestrus) on oestrus, ovulation and endocrine parameters. Four multiparous sows were used. Follicular growth and ovulation were recorded by ultrasonography. The first oestrous cycle after weaning was used as control cycle. Onset of oestrus in the sow occurs 3-4 days after the time when plasma progesterone reaches a concentration of 8 nmol/l. The progesterone profile in the control cycle of the individual sow was used for estimation when the ACTH injections should start. In the third pro-oestrus ACTH (2.5 microg/kg) was given via an indwelling catheter every 2 h for 48 h. The sows were euthanased 4-6 days after onset of the third oestrus and the ovaries were examined. Cortisol levels were elevated during the treatment period (p < 0.05). The second cycle, in which the sows were injected with ACTH, was prolonged with 2.5 days compared with the control cycle (p < 0.05). The oestradiol pattern during oestrus was similar in the control and the treatment cycle in ovulating sows. Three sows had ovulated (fresh corpora lutea), but the ovaries contained additionally one or several luteinized follicles/cysts. In conclusion, ACTH administration during pro-oestrus caused a prolongation of the oestrous cycle and a disturbed follicular development.     

Timing of preovulatory LH surge and ovulation in superovulated sheep are affected by follicular status at start of the FSH treatment.

The aims of this study were to evaluate the chronology of periovulatory events (oestrus behaviour, LH surge and ovulation) in 16 superovulated Manchega sheep and to determine whether follicular status at start of the FSH supply might affect their occurrence. Mean timing for onset of oestrus behaviour was detected at 28.1 +/- 0.7 h after sponge withdrawal; the preovulatory LH surge and ovulation started at 37.2 +/- 0.7 h and 65.4 +/- 0.7 h after progestagen withdrawal, respectively. The intervals between oestrus, LH surge and ovulation were affected by a high individual variability, which might be the cause for reported decreased efficiency in embryo production. Current results also addressed the role of follicular status at start of the superovulatory treatment on the preovulatory LH surge and the ovulation. The interval LH surge-ovulation was increased in ewes with a growing dominant follicle at starting the FSH treatment (32.3 +/- 0.9 vs 28.6 +/- 0.5 h, p < 0.05). The developmental stage of the largest follicle at starting the superovulatory treatment also affected occurrence of LH surge and ovulation; follicles in growing phase advanced the occurrence of the LH surge and ovulation when compared to decreasing follicles (33.0 +/- 1.0 vs 43.5 +/- 1.1 h, p < 0.05, for LH peak and 60.7 +/- 1.1 vs 72.8 +/- 1.2 h, p < 0.05, for ovulation). Thus, only ewes with growing follicles ovulated prior to 55 h after sponge withdrawal; conversely, no sheep with decreasing follicles ovulated earlier than 67 h, when an 85.7% of the ewes bearing growing follicles has ovulated at 63 h.     

Duration of lactation,endocrine and metabolic state,and fertility of primiparous sows

The objectives of this study were to determine factors affecting the reproductive performance of primiparous sows early weaned (EW; n = 35) at d 14 or conventionally weaned (CW; n = 35) at d 24 of lactation. Sow BW and backfat were recorded at farrowing, weekly until weaning, and at standing heat. Feed intake was controlled throughout lactation to standardize nutritional effects on subsequent reproductive performance. Litter size was standardized across treatments within 48 h after farrowing, and litter weight was recorded until weaning. In subsets of sows, blood samples were collected from 10 h before to 10 h after weaning, and then every 6 h until ovulation. Sows were heat checked twice daily and bred at 24-h intervals during standing heat using pooled semen. Ultrasonography every 6 h determined time of ovulation. Sows were either slaughtered within 24 h after ovulation to assess ovulation rate, fertilization rate, and embryonic development in vitro, or at d 28 of gestation to determine ovulation rate and embryonic survival. Compared with CW sows, EW sows had more backfat at weaning (15.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 14.7 +/- 0.5 mm; P < 0.001). Also, CW sows tended to lose more BW and to have lower IGF-I concentrations, indicating poorer body condition. Duration of lactation did not affect ovulation rate (EW = 17.6 +/- 0.7; CW = 18.7 +/- 0.6), fertilization rate (EW = 96.0 +/- 2.2; CW = 88.2 +/- 4.7%), or embryo survival to d 28 (EW = 62.5 +/- 4.5; CW = 63.1 +/- 5.0%). There was a marginal effect of duration of lactation on weaning-to-estrus interval (EW = 120 +/- 3; CW = 112 +/- 3 h; P < 0.06) and duration of estrus (EW = 52.4 +/- 2.3; CW = 46.3 +/- 2.2 h; P < 0.08). Overall, embryonic survival, not ovulation rate, seems to be the limiting factor for potential litter size in the second parity. Although fertility in both EW and CW sows studied was compromised, endocrine and metabolic data indicate that the mechanisms affecting reproductive performance may differ between the two weaning systems. The LH, FSH, and estradiol data from the EW sows are characteristic of animals with limited follicular development and incomplete recovery of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis; consequently, the integrity of the uterine environment may be adversely affected and limit embryonic survival. In CW sows, variability in metabolic state seemed to be the key factor limiting the fertility, again adversely affecting embryonic survival.     

hCG‐Induced Ovulation in Thoroughbred Mares Does Not Affect Corpus luteum Development and Function During Early Pregnancy

Our aim was to compare Corpus luteum (CL) development and blood plasma concentration of progesterone ([P₄]) in thoroughbred mares after spontaneous (Control: C) or human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG)‐induced ovulation. Lactating mares (C = 12; hCG = 21) were daily teased and mated during second oestrus post‐partum. Treated mares received 2500 IU hCG i.v. at first day of behavioural oestrus when dominant follicular size was >35, ≤42 mm and mated 12–24 h after. Control mares in oestrus were mated with dominant follicular size ≥45 mm. Dominant follicle before ovulation, CL and gestational sac were measured by ultrasound and [P₄] by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Blood sampling and ultrasound CL exams were done at days 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 60 and 90 after ovulation and gestational sac from day 12 after ovulation in pregnant (P) mares; non‐pregnant (NP) were followed until oestrus returned. Data analyses considered four subgroups: hCG‐P, hCG‐NP, C‐P and C‐NP. Preovulatory follicular size was smaller in hCG mares than in C: 39.2 ± 2.7 mm vs 51.0 ± 1.8 mm (p < 0.0001). All hCG mares ovulated 24–48 h after treatment and presented similar oestrus duration as controls. C. luteum size in P mares showed the same pattern of development through days 4–35, presenting erratic differences during initial establishment. Thus, on days 1 and 3, CL was smaller in hCG‐P (p < 0.05); while in hCG‐NP, CL size was greater than in C‐NP on day three (p = 0.03). Corpus luteum size remained stable until day 90 in hCG‐P mares, while in C‐P a transient and apparently not functional increase was detected on days 40 and 45 (p < 0.05) and the decrease from day 60 onwards, made this difference to disappear. No differences were observed in [P₄] pattern between P, or between NP subgroups, respectively. So, hCG‐induced ovulation does not affect CL development, neither [P₄] during early pregnancy. One cycle pregnancy rate tended to be lower in hCG mares while season pregnancy rates were similar to controls.     

Study on the oestrous synchronization in gilts by using progestin altrenogest and hCG: its effect on the follicular development, ovulation time and subsequent reproductive performance.

The aim of this study was to further investigate the effect of using progestin altrenogest and hCG to synchronize the oestrous cycle and its effect on follicular development, ovulation time and subsequent reproductive performance. Thirty crossbred gilts were divided into three groups. Group A (control) received a 5 ml of normal saline for 18 consecutive days by individually top-dressing. Groups B and C gilts received 20 mg (5 ml) of progestin altrenogest for 18 consecutive days by individually top-dressing. On day 3 (72 h) after withdrawal of progestin altrenogest, Group C gilts received hCG (500 IU, im). The follicular development and ovulation time were examined by transabdominal ultrasonography. Subsequent reproductive performances, i.e. number of total born per litter (NTB), number of live born per litter (NBA), number of stillbirth per litter (NSB), average piglet birth weight (ABW), lactation length (LL) and weaning to oestrous interval (WOI), were recorded. None of the gilts in Group A showed oestrus within 10 days after withdrawal of normal saline. Groups B (eight of 10) and C gilts (four of 10) came into oestrus at 5.6 +/- 0.5 and 6.5 +/- 0.6 days after withdrawal of progestin altrenogest, respectively. The ovulation time of Groups B and C gilts took placed at 25.0 +/- 4.7 and 25.0 +/- 5.0 h after standing oestrus, respectively. The pre-ovulatory follicular size (diameter) of Groups B and C gilts was 8.0 +/- 2.0 and 11.0 +/- 3.0 mm, respectively. A tendency of larger litter size (NTB) in Group B gilts was found when compared with Group A gilts. To conclude, using progestin altrenogest alone can be used to synchronize the oestrous cycle in gilts without unenthusiastic effect on the follicular development, ovulation time and subsequent reproductive performances. However, treatment of gilts with hCG at day 3 (72 h) after withdrawal of altrenogest had unenthusiastic effect on oestrus synchronization.     

Control of the weaning-to-estrus interval in sows using gonadotropins and prostaglandins during lactation.

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effectiveness of various strategies using gonadotropins to induce ovulation during lactation as a means of controlling the weaning-to-estrus interval in sows. The objective of Exp. 1 was to examine the efficacy of various gonadotropin regimens for induction of ovulation during lactation. Primiparous (n = 60) and multiparous (n = 83) crossbred sows were assigned, before farrowing, to one of four treatments: no injection (control); 1,000 IU hCG on d 0 (hCG-0; d 0 = day of farrowing); P.G. 600 + 1,000 IU hCG 4 and 7 d after farrowing, respectively (hCG-7); or P.G. 600 + 1,000 IU hCG 11 and 14 d after farrowing, respectively (hCG-14). Sows were weaned on 18 +/- 2 d after farrowing and monitored daily for estrus via exposure to mature boars. The criterion for determining the induction of ovulation was a sustained increase in serum progesterone concentrations above 4.0 ng/mL. The most consistent response to exogenous gonadotropins was on d 0, with an 80% response in primiparous sows (12/15) and a 71% response in multiparous sows (15/21). Weaning-to-estrus intervals for multiparous sows were longer (P = .05) for hCG-14 and hCG-7 than for control and hCG-0 sows. Weaning-to-estrus intervals for primiparous sows were longer (P = .05) for the hCG-14 than for the hCG-0 treatment. The objective of Exp. 2 was to ascertain the effects of postpartum treatment with hCG (1,000 IU) on d 0 and PGF2alpha (10 mg) at d 14 on the weaning-to-estrus interval in multiparous sows weaned at d 14 after birth. Before farrowing, sows (n = 60) were randomly assigned to one of four treatments: positive control, weaning at d 21; negative control, weaning at d 14; hCG within 24 h after farrowing, weaning at d 14; or hCG within 24 h after farrowing and PGF2alpha at weaning, weaning at d 14. Weaning-to-estrus intervals were longer (P = .05) in sows receiving PGF2alpha than in the other treatments. Results indicate that it is possible to induce ovulation immediately after farrowing, using a single injection of hCG, and this strategy can be used to uncouple weaning from the resumption of reproductive activity. However, the administration of PGF2alpha at 14 d after farrowing did not consistently cause regression of the induced corpora lutea.     

Administration of p.g. 600 to sows at weaning and the time of ovulation as determined by transrectal ultrasound

This study determined whether the interval from estrus to ovulation was altered by giving P.G. 600 to sows at weaning. Mixed-parity sows received P.G. 600 i.m. (n = 72) or no treatment (n = 65) at weaning (d 0). Beginning on d 0, sows were observed for estrus twice daily. At the onset of estrus and thereafter, ultrasound was performed twice daily to determine the average size of the largest follicles and time of ovulation. Weaning age (20.1+/-0.4 d) did not differ (P > 0.10) between treatments. More P.G. 600 sows expressed estrus within 8 d (P < 0.01) than controls (94.4% vs 78.4%, respectively). Parity was associated with expression of estrus (P < 0.02), with 78% of first-parity and 93% of later-parity sows exhibiting estrus. However, no treatment x parity effect was observed (P > 0.10). The interval from weaning to estrus was reduced (P < 0.0001) by P.G. 600 compared with controls (3.8+/-0.1 d vs 4.9+/-0.1 d). Follicle size at estrus was not affected by treatment (P > 0.10). The percentage of sows that ovulated did not differ (P > 0.10) for P.G. 600 and control sows (90.3% vs 81.5%, respectively). Time of ovulation after estrus was not affected by treatment and averaged 44.8 h. However, univariate analysis indicated that the interval from weaning to estrus influenced the interval from estrus to ovulation (r = 0.43, P < 0.0001). Further, multivariate analysis showed an effect of treatment on the intervals from weaning to estrus, weaning to ovulation (P < 0.0001), and estrus to ovulation (P < 0.04). Within 4 d after weaning, 81% of the P.G. 600 sows had expressed estrus compared with 33% of controls. However, this trend reversed for ovulation, with only 35% of P.G. 600 sows ovulating by 36 h after estrus compared with 40% of controls. The estrus-to-ovulation interval was also longer for control and P.G. 600 sows expressing estrus < or = 3 d of weaning (45 h and 58 h, respectively) than for sows expressing estrus after 5 d (39 h and 32 h, respectively). Farrowing rate and litter size were not influenced by treatment. However, the interval from last insemination to ovulation (P < 0.02) indicated that more sows farrowed (80%) when the last insemination occurred at < or = 23 to > or = 0 h before ovulation compared with insemination > or = 24 h before ovulation (55%). In summary, P.G. 600 enhanced the expression of estrus and ovulation in weaned sows but, breeding protocols may need to be optimized for time of ovulation based on the interval from weaning to estrus.     

Effect of short-term calf removal at three stages of a follicular wave on fate of a dominant follicle in postpartum beef cows.

The hypothesis that ovulation in response to short-term (48 h) calf removal (CR) is dependent on the developmental stage of the dominant follicle was tested in two studies. The objective of Exp. 1 was to characterize the fate of a dominant follicle following 48-h CR on d 2, 4, or 8 of a postpartum follicular wave. Ovaries of 61 beef cows were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography starting at d 20 to 21 postpartum. Treatments were no CR (n = 14) and CR on d 2 (n = 12), 4 (n = 16), or 8 (n = 10) of first detected follicular wave. Percentage of cows that ovulated a dominant follicle following treatment was not different among groups (P = 0.62). Maximum size of dominant follicles was larger in cows that ovulated (P = 0.002) than in cows that did not ovulate. The objectives of Exp. 2 were 1) to determine whether a follicular wave could be synchronized in anestrous cows following injection of 1 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) and 200 mg of progesterone (P4; EB + P4); 2) to characterize the fate of dominant follicles following 48-h CR at three stages of a synchronized follicular wave; and 3) to determine whether estrous cycles of normal length followed ovulation in cows pretreated with EB + P4. Ovaries of 50 anestrous beef cows were examined daily as in Exp. 1. Treatments were sesame oil (SO) injected (i.m.) on d 25 postpartum and no CR (n = 9); EB + P4 and no CR (n = 9); EB + P4 and CR on 6 (n = 12), 8 (n = 9), or 12 (n = 11) d after injection. The EB and P4 injections were given on d 25 postpartum. Variability in day of emergence of subsequent follicular waves was lower in cows receiving EB + P4 than in SO-injected cows (P < 0.05). The percentage of cows that ovulated was not different (P = 0.16), but CR increased the percentage of cows that ovulated when groups that received EB + P4 were compared to the EB + P4 group that did not have CR (53.1 vs 11.1%, respectively; P < 0.05). Maximum diameter of dominant follicles was larger (P = 0.05) in ovulatory follicles. The luteal phase was longer (P < 0.03) in cows receiving EB + P4 injection (10.6 +/- 1.2 d) than in cows receiving SO (4.4 +/- 2.2 d). In summary, the maximum size of ovulatory follicles was greater than that of nonovulatory follicles, the ovulatory response of postpartum anestrous cows was maintained through d 8 of a follicular wave, synchronization of follicular waves was accomplished in postpartum cows using EB + P4, and the subsequent luteal phase length was increased in animals that were administered EB + P4.     

Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone infused in a pulsatile or continuous fashion on serum gonadotropin concentrations and ovulation in the mare.

Studies were conducted to compare continuous vs pulsatile i.v. infusion of GnRH on serum gonadotropin concentrations and ovulation in seasonally anestrous mares and in cycling mares. Anestrous mares (Exp. 1) received no treatment (control; n = 3), 2, or 20 micrograms of GnRH/h continuous infusion (CI) (n = 4 and n = 6, respectively), or 20 micrograms of GnRH/h pulsatile infusion (PI) (n = 5). After initiation of GnRH infusion, serum LH levels increased earlier, and to a greater extent, in the PI group than in other groups (P less than .05). In contrast, serum FSH concentrations did not differ among groups. The number of days to development of the first 35-mm follicle was not different among GnRH treatment groups; however, mares receiving PI ovulated on d 9.4 of treatment, 2.8 d earlier than those receiving 20 micrograms of GnRH/h CI (P less than .05). Mares given 2 micrograms of GnRH/h CI failed to ovulate spontaneously after 16 d of treatment, but each one ovulated within 2 to 4 d after injection of 2,000 IU of hCG on d 16. Control mares did not ovulate or show any significant follicular development throughout the experiment. Cycling mares (Exp. 2) received no treatment (control; n = 6), 20 micrograms of GnRH/h CI, or 20 micrograms of GnRH/h PI (n = 4) beginning on d 16 of an estrous cycle (d 0 = day of ovulation). Serum LH concentrations in all groups increased after initiation of treatment; however, on the day of ovulation LH concentrations were lower in the CI group than in the PI or control groups (P less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Follicular dynamics after treatment with hCG for ovulation induction in mares

In this study the use of hCG for induction of ovulation is described. Factors such as follicle diameter at the time of administration of hCG (3000 IE hCG i.v.), follicular growth after hCG and the rate of double ovulations were evaluated. A total of 168 mares presented for artificial insemination were used. In 249 estrous periods hCG was given to mares exhibiting standing estrous when a minimum follicle diameter of 30 mm and a well developed edema of the endometrium could be detected by ultrasonography. In nine estrous periods ovulation occurred within 24 hours after hCG. The majority of mares (216; 86.7%) ovulated 24 to 48 hours after hCG and in 24 cases ovulation was delayed beyond 48 hours. Follicle size at the time of hCG administration (30-34 mm, 35-39 mm, > or = 40 mm) had no influence on the percentage of mares ovulating 24 to 48 hours after hCG (89.2%, 87.9%, and 83.7%, respectively). Double ovulations could be observed in 17.7% of estrous periods. The one cycle pregnancy rate was not influenced by follicle size (small 45.9%; medium 41.6%; large 47.5%). Repeated treatments with hCG during successive estrous cycles within one year did not influence the rate of responding to hCG. Mares in standing estrous respond well to hCG if a minimum follicle size of 30 mm and a well developed endometrial folding is present.     

Effect of the administration of GnRH or hCG on time of ovulation and the onset of estrus-to-ovulation interval in sows in Thailand

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the control of ovulation by the administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) at the onset of estrus. Thirty-three multiparous sows housed under tropical conditions and showing standing estrus within 5 days after weaning were included. The sows were allocated to three groups, spontaneous ovulation (control group, n = 10), induced ovulation using 750 IU hCG (hCG group, n = 10), and induced ovulation using 50 μg GnRH (GnRH group, n = 13). The hormones were given at the onset of estrus and the occurrence of ovulation was monitored every 6 h by transrectal ultrasonography. Data for weaning-to-estrus interval, onset of estrus-to-ovulation interval (EOI), and the length of estrus were recorded. All sows in the control and hCG groups ovulated, while 3 out of 13 sows treated with GnRH developed cystic ovaries (did not ovulate). Of those sows ovulating, the EOI of the hCG (40.2 ± 1.7 h) and GnRH (37.5 ± 3.3 h) groups were shorter than that of the control group (63.6 ± 9.6 h; P < 0.05). In conclusion, the administration of either hCG or GnRH at the onset of estrus can control time of ovulation but, at the dose employed, sows receiving GnRH may develop ovarian cysts.     

Successful Timing of Ovulation Using Deslorelin (Ovuplant®) is Labour-saving in Mares Aimed for Single AI with Frozen Semen

To minimize the number of matings/inseminations, controlled ovulation has been practised since a long time ago. A potent short-term implant, releasing the GnRH analogue deslorelin (Ovuplant((R))) has been used in Australia and North America for several years for hastening the ovulation time in mares, but the product is not registered on the European market. This study was aimed to investigate: (1) ovulation time in mares implanted with Ovuplant when the largest follicle was 42 mm or more in size, (2) repeatability of ovulation time in successive oestruses when treated with Ovuplant, (3) pregnancy rate after single insemination with frozen-thawed semen near ovulation. This study included 11 mares, and altogether 17 timed ovulations. Follicular growth and ovulation were determined by palpation per rectum and by ultrasonography in the morning (at 7:00 hours) every second day until observation of a follicle of at least 42 mm in diameter. Then the mares were re-examined in the afternoon (at 19:00 hours), and an Ovuplant was inserted in the mucosa of the vulva. For detection of ovulation, the mares were palpated and ultrasounded repeatedly from 36-42 h after the insert. The mares were inseminated with frozen-thawed semen once at ovulation. All mares ovulated at 36-48 h after treatment and 94% at 38-42 h after treatment. The six mares that were treated at two oestruses ovulated at 39.9 and 39.7 h, respectively. Five of 11 mares (45.4%), inseminated with frozen-thawed semen at the first oestrous cycle were pregnant day 14-16 after ovulation. Using this protocol, there is no need of palpation/ultrasonography during night hours, and examination at 36 and 41 h after implantation might be enough for estimation of ovulation time.     

Use of a small dose of estradiol benzoate during diestrus to synchronize development of the ovulatory follicle in cattle

We tested the hypothesis that a small dose of estradiol benzoate (EB) at the midstage of the estrous cycle in cattle would synchronize the subsequent pattern of ovarian follicular development, estrus, and ovulation. Nonlactating Friesian cows received either 1 mg of EB i.m. on d 13 of the estrous cycle (T; n = 12; estrus = d0) or served as untreated controls (C; n = 12). Their ovaries were examined daily with transrectal ultrasonography from d 7, and blood samples were collected 0, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h after treatment on d 13. Plasma concentrations of estradiol-17beta were elevated to 12 pg/mL during the initial 24 h following treatment, compared with a baseline of 1 pg/mL in untreated controls (P < .001). Progesterone concentrations in cows of the T group declined between 24 and 48 h after treatment (-3.2 +/- .5 ng/mL) compared with little change in concentrations of progesterone in cows of the C group at this time (P < .01). This difference was coincident with an earlier time to regression of the corpus luteum in cows of the T group. Disregarding treatment groups, the second dominant follicle of the estrous cycle (DF2) emerged on d 10.6 +/- .3 and was 9.4 +/- .4 mm in diameter on d 13. Further growth of the DF2 was halted by EB treatment on d 13. Cessation of growth occurred irrespective of whether the DF2 was in the early or late growth phase, and a new follicular wave emerged 4.5 +/- .2 d later. The dominant follicle from this wave (DF3) ovulated 5 d after emergence in most cases. During the estrous cycle of every cow in the T group, there were three waves of follicular development (3-wave), whereas the ratio of 2:3 waves of follicular development in cows of the C group was 1:3. Consequently, the interval from emergence to ovulation of the ovulatory dominant follicle in cows of the C group ranged from 3 to 11 d. The dynamics of ovarian follicular wave development during the estrous cycle can be strategically manipulated by treating with a small dose of EB to synchronize proestrous development of the ovulatory follicle.     

Attempt to control the day of ovulation in cycling pony mares by associating a GnRH antagonist with hCG

With the objective of controlling the day of ovulation, 40 mares were assigned to a control or three treated groups: A3d, A4d, and A5d. The treated groups received antarelix (Teverelix 0.01 mg/kg, i.v., twice a day) for 3, 4, or 5 days from the day the dominant follicle (F1) reached 28 mm (=D0), and one injection of hCG (1600 IU, i.v.) on D1, D2, or D3, respectively. Control mares received one injection of hCG when F1 reached 35 mm. Plasma LH, FSH, progesterone, and total estrogens were assayed. In the A3d, A4d, and A5d groups, 9 (90%), 6 (60%), and 5 (50%) out of 10 mares, respectively, ovulated on the expected day (i.e. between 24 and 48 h after hCG injection). In the control group, 7/10 (70%) presented the typical response to hCG. For 3 mares in both the A4d and A5d groups, the dominant follicle at the time the treatment was started did not ovulate and ovulation was postponed for between 11 and 15 days after the end of treatment. In the treated mares, the LH surge was abolished, and total estrogens were depressed during the preovulatory peak but the concentrations of FSH were not modified. Endocrine parameters were not altered in postponed cycles. Fertility did not differ in treated and control cycles. These results demonstrate that in mares: (1) ovulation can be programmed on a specific day of a 3-day period, with a success rate of 67%, by a treatment associating antarelix and one injection of hCG; (2) nevertheless in 20% of cases the dominant follicle regresses and does not ovulate; (3) for these mares ovulation is postponed by approximately 2 weeks; (4) terminal growth of the preovulatory follicle only requires low circulating concentrations of LH but atresia induced by a GnRH antagonist is significant when this treatment is administrated for more than 18 h.     

Effects of induction of ovulation with GnRH or HCG on follicular and luteal blood flow in Holstein-Friesian heifers

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on follicular blood flow (FBF) during the pre-ovulatory period and on luteal blood flow (LBF) during dioestrus in Holstein-Friesian heifers. Twelve animals were randomly divided into two groups and treated with either intramuscular injection of 100 μg GnRH or intravenous (IV) injection of 5000 IU hCG on Day 0 (oestrus, 48 h after administration of PGF(2α) ) to induce ovulation. Follicular size (FS), FBF and time of ovulation were recorded with colour Doppler sonography at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after GnRH and hCG treatment. Luteal size (LS) and LBF were investigated on Day 9 and 12 after ovulation. Plasma samples were taken to determine total oestrogens (E(tot) ) and progesterone (P(4) ) after each examination. Ovulation occurred between 24 and 48 h after treatment in all animals. No difference (p > 0.05) was observed in FS between the two treatment groups. Follicular blood flow was higher in the hCG group than that was in GnRH group at 1 h after treatment (p < 0.01). Total oestrogens were also higher (p < 0.01) in the hCG group than GnRH group; however, this difference was only obvious at 12 h after treatment. No difference (p > 0.05) was observed in LS, LBF or P(4) levels on Day 9 and 12 between treatment groups. In conclusion, the results suggest that induction of ovulation with hCG and GnRH has a temporary effect on FBF and oestrogen levels while no effect on the size of corpora lutea, LBF and P(4) levels was observed.     

Effect of hCG on Early Luteal Serum Progesterone Concentrations in PG600‐Treated Gilts

Gilt oestrus and ovulation responses to injection of a combination of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) (PG600) can be unpredictable, possibly reflecting inadequate circulating LH activity. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of PG600 followed by supplemental hCG on gilt ovarian responses. In experiment 1, 212 Hypor gilts (160 day of age) housed on two farms in Spain received intramuscular (i.m.) injections of PG600 (n = 47), or PG600 with an additional 200 IU hCG injected either concurrently (hCG‐0; n = 39), or at 24 h (hCG‐24; n = 41) or 48 h (hCG‐48; n = 45) after PG600. A further 40 gilts served as non‐injected controls. Ovulation responses were determined on the basis of initial blood progesterone concentrations being <1 ng/ml and achieving >5 ng / ml 10 d after the PG600 injection. The incidence of ovulating gilts having progesterone concentrations >30 ng/ml were recorded. During the study period, 10% of control gilts ovulated whereas 85–100% of hormone‐treated gilts ovulated. There were no significant differences among hormone groups for proportions of gilts ovulating. The proportions of gilts having circulating progesterone concentrations >30 ng/ml were increased (p ≤ 0.02) in all hCG treated groups compared with the PG600 group. In experiment 2, a total of 76 Hypor gilts at either 150 or 200 days of age were injected with PG600 (n = 18), 400 IU eCG followed by 200 IU hCG 24 h later (n = 20), PG600 followed by 100 IU hCG 24 h later (n = 17), or 400 IU eCG followed by 300 IU hCG 24 h later (n = 21). Blood samples were obtained 10 days later for progesterone assay. There were no effects of treatment or age on incidence of ovulation, but fewer 150‐day‐old gilts treated with PG600 or 400 IU eCG followed by 200 IU hCG had progesterone concentrations >30 ng / ml. We conclude that hCG treatment subsequent to PG600 treatment will generate a higher circulating progesterone concentration, although the effect is not evident in older, presumably peripubertal, gilts. The mechanism involved and implications for fertility remain to be determined.