The influence of grass and maize silage quality on apparent diet digestibility, metabolizable energy concentration and intake of finishing beef cattle

The effects of offering a range of grass silages and mixtures of grass and maize silages on the intake of beef cattle were studied. Four grass silages (GS1, GS2, GS3 and GS4) were used. Grass silage 1 was ensiled from a second regrowth in mid‐late September and treated with an inoculant additive. Grass silages 2, 3 and 4 were ensiled, without additive, from a primary regrowth harvested in early July, late May and mid‐June respectively. Wilting periods were 8, 30, 36 and 36 h for GS1, GS2, GS3 and GS4 respectively. Grass silages 1, 2 and 3 were precision chopped and ensiled in bunker silos, while GS4 was ensiled in round bales. The DM content (g kg^?1) and starch concentration (g kg^?1 DM) of the three maize silages (MS1, MS2 and MS3) used were 256 and 128, 256 and 184, and 402 and 328 for MS1, MS2 and MS3 respectively. Seventy‐two Charolais and Limousin cross‐bred steers were used in a changeover design with two 4‐week periods. The study consisted of sixteen treatments incorporating the four grass silages fed alone and with the three maize silages arranged as a 4 × 4 factorial design. The grass silage and maize silage mixtures were offered in a ratio of 0·60:0·40 (DM basis) once daily using individual Calan gates. All silages were offered ad libitum with 3 kg per head per day of a concentrate supplement. Dry matter and metabolizable energy (ME) intakes were highest with diets based on grass silage GS4 compared with diets containing the other grass silages. Metabolizable energy intakes of diets containing no maize silage, and those based on MS1 and MS2, were similar (P > 0·05) but lower than that of diets containing MS3. Only limited increases were found in DM and ME intakes with the inclusion of maize silage in grass silage‐based diets while offering high‐quality grass silage (assessed in terms of DM content, and fibre and N concentrations) promoted high voluntary intakes.     

Effect of compaction,delayed sealing and aerobic exposure on forage choice and short‐term intake of maize silage by goats

Forage choice and intake by ruminants depend on various factors. This study aimed to determine the effects of compaction, delayed sealing and aerobic exposure on forage choice and short‐term dry‐matter intake (DMI) of maize silage by goats. Whole‐crop maize (277 g/kg dry matter [DM]) in 120‐L silos was compacted at either low (194 kg DM/m³) or high (234 kg DM/m³) density, and sealed immediately at day 0 or with a delay at day 2 or day 4 post‐filling, making a total of six treatments. After ensiling for at least 175 days, silages were exposed to air for 6 days. In 2‐day intervals, silages were sampled for chemical analyses and were vacuum‐stored for use in preference trials. During the experimental phase, each possible two‐way combination of the aerobically exposed silages (days 0, 2, 4 and 6 post‐opening) of the treatments and lucerne hay was offered as free choice to goats (n = 5) for 3 hr. Exposing silages to air for >4 days post‐opening caused strong avoidance and lowest intakes. Under the conditions of the study, aerobic exposure after ensiling had a more pronounced effect on silage preference and short‐time DMI than compaction and delayed sealing. Increasing fibre fractions, a deteriorating microbial status and poor silage sensory properties, probably caused by a combination of different fermentation products, can be considered for decrease in preference.     

Mixing whole-crop pea–oat silage and grass–clover silage: positive effects on intake and milk production of dairy cows

Forty‐eight high‐yielding dairy cows of the Swedish Red breed were used to examine the effects of providing pea–oat silage (P), grass–clover silage (G) and a 0·50:0·50 mixture of the silages (M) ad libitum in diets with two concentrate levels (7 or 10 kg d^?1). A 9‐week experiment, including a 2‐week pre‐experimental period in which the cows were all fed the same diet, and an in vivo apparent digestibility study were conducted comparing the six dietary treatments (M7, M10, P7, P10, G7, G10). Intake and digestibility of the diets and milk production and live weight of the cows were measured. The G silage [11·3 MJ ME kg^?1 dry matter (DM)] was first‐cut grass herbage wilted for 24 h prior to addition of an additive, containing formic acid, propionic acid and ammonia, at 4 L t^?1 fresh matter (FM). The P forage was cut when the peas were at pod fill and ensiled directly with 6 L t^?1 FM of the same additive. The main hypothesis tested, that cows fed the M silage would produce more milk than the cows fed either the P or the G silages, was confirmed. The cows fed the M7 dietary treatment had similar milk yield and milk composition to cows offered the M10, G10 and P10 dietary treatments, and cows offered the G7 and P7 dietary treatments had lower milk and milk protein yields. This suggested that a mixed ration of pea–oat bi‐crop and grass–clover silage has a concentrate‐sparing effect, and that the use of pea–oat bi‐crop and grass–clover silage as a mixed ration for high‐yielding dairy cows can be recommended.     

Effects of including bioactive legumes in grass silage on digestion parameters,nitrogen balance and methane emissions in sheep

The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of feeding sheep with silage mixtures containing bioactive legumes on intake and digestive parameters. The bioactive legumes used were sainfoin (SF, Onobrychis viciifolia) and red clover (RC, Trifolium pratense), which contain condensed tannins (CT) and polyphenol oxidase respectively. Five treatments were assigned to two groups of sheep according to a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design. The five types of silages tested were, on a dry matter (DM) basis: pure timothy grass silage (Phleum pratense, control, T), three binary mixtures of T‐SF, T‐RC and RC‐SF (500 g/kg each) and a ternary mixture of T‐RC‐SF (500, 250 and 250 g/kg respectively). The daily voluntary DM intake of silage mixtures containing both SF and RC was greater than for pure T silage, while the presence of SF resulted in lower organic matter digestibility compared to pure T. The rumen disappearance rate measured in situ increased linearly with the presence of SF and RC in silage. The nitrogen (N) digestibility was greater for pure T and T‐RC than for T‐SF, and the amount of N retained daily by the animals was greater for RC‐containing silages than for T and T‐SF. The methane (CH₄) yield was greater for pure T than for the silage mixtures containing SF. We conclude that the presence of RC in silage could boost performances through intake and N retention, while SF‐based mixtures appear to have reduced negative environmental impacts through the reduction of CH₄ emissions.     

Comparison of the fermentation quality and nutritive value of sulphuric and formic acid-treated silages fed to beef cattle

Five experiments were carried out in the years 1980-1983 and 1986 to study the effect of treating grass at ensiling with sulphuric acid (850 g kg^?1) and formic acid (850 g kg^?1) additives alone, and in mixtures with or without formalin on the preservation of grass, in vivo digestibility in sheep, in-silo loss, intake and performance of finishing cattle. Primary growth grass was ensiled in experiments 1 (3–4 June 1980), 2 (12-15 June 1981) and 3 (31 May-2 June 1982), primary regrowth grass in experiment 4 (1-2 August 1983) and secondary regrowth grass in experiment 5 (7-10 October 1986). During the ensiling period within each experiment, approximately 60 t of unwilted, double-chopped, additive-treated or untreated grass was packed into covered concrete-walled 60-t capacity silos. The dry matter (DM) contents of the ensiled grass in experiments 1, 2 and 5 ranged from 155-180 g kg^?1 and were lower than those recorded in experiments 3 and 4 (214 g kg^?1). With the exception of grass ensiled in experiment 2, where water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) contents were low, at 104 g kg^?1 DM, grass in all other experiments contained relatively high WSC contents ranging from 140-154 g kg^?1 DM. In experiments 1, 3 and 4 all silages were well-preserved. However, in experiment 2 the 450 g kg^?1 sulphuric acid-treated and formic acid-treated silages displayed significantly lower pH, buffering capacity (Bc) and ammonia nitrogen contents than the untreated silage. In experiment 5, the sulphuric acid-treated and formic acid-treated silages displayed significantly lower pH, Bc, ammonia nitrogen, butyrate and volatile fatty acid (VFA) contents than the untreated silage. Each of the silages was offered daily with various levels of a supplementary concentrate for approximately 70-d periods to twelve animals of mixed breed in experiments 1, 3, 4 and 5 and to fifteen animals in experiment 2. All animals weighed between 380-470 kg at the start of the experiments. In experiments 1, 2 and 3 there were no significant differences between silages for any of the intake or animal performance parameters. In experiment 4, cattle fed the formic acid-treated silage displayed significantly higher silage DM intakes and daily liveweight gains than those fed the sulphuric acid-treated and untreated silages; in experiment 5, cattle fed the formic acid-treated silage displayed significantly higher silage DM intakes than those fed the untreated silage. It was concluded that formic acid was a more effective silage additive than sulphuric acid. Increasing the level of supplementation significantly decreased silage DM intakes in cattle in experiments 3 and 4, and significantly increased daily liveweight gains and daily carcass in cattle in experiments 1, 3 and 4.     

The effect of system of silage harvesting and feeding on milk production

Two silages were produced by harvesting grass either unwilted, using a direct cutting flail forage harvester (flail-direct), or wilted following precut-ting and being picked up using a meter-chop harvester (precision-wilted). Formic acid was applied at the rates of 2·45 and 2·9 1 t^-1 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. Weather conditions were difficult, both before and during harvesting with a total of 27 mm rainfall falling on the wilted herbage before ensiling. The in-silo dry matter losses were 199 and 68 g kg^-1 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. The resulting silages had mean particle lengths of 49 and 24 mm, dry matter contents of 186 and 276 g kg-^-1 and D-values of 068 and 062 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. During a 141-day feeding period commencing on 19 November, the two silages were offered to 88 British Friesian cows with a mean calving date of 21 January and divided into four groups in a 2×2 factorial design experiment. The silos were divided longitudinally and two groups of cows were self-fed the silages in situ, one for each silage type, while the other two groups were easy-fed the same silages along a feed fence. There were no significant interactions between system of silage harvesting and feeding on any of the measurements of animal performance. Animals on the flail-direct silage consumed 16% less silage dry matter and produced 10% more milk per cow than those on the precision-wilted silage treatment. The overall effect was a 12% greater milk output for each unit of grass dry matter ensiled with the flail-direct than with the precision-wilted harvesting system. System of silage feeding did not significantly influence silage intake or milk output, with the mean milk yields during the final 21 days of the study being 234 and 236 kg d^-1 (±0.30) for the self- and easy-feed systems, respectively. The effects of the treatments on milk composition, liveweight change, body condition score and total ration digestibility are also reported.     

The effects of cereal supplementation of grass and maize silages

Grass and maize silages were fed alone and with two levels of a barley supplement to Friesian steers of about 300 kg liveweight. The organic matter (OM) intakes of grass and maize silage were similar although the OM digestibilities of the silages were 0·722 and 0·649 respectively. For both silages, barley supplementation increased total OM intake and total digestible OM intake by 0·46·0·08 and 0·37·0·06 g per g OM of supplement respectively. Liveweight gains on grass and maize silage diets were 1·38 and 1·20 kg d^-1 respectively, but the differences were not significant (P> 0·05).     

A comparison of grass/white clover and grass silages offered to dairy cows as the sole feed

Two diets were compared: perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) silage and perennial ryegrass/white clover ( Trifolium repens L.) silage, in each case fed ad libitum , without supplementation, to lactating dairy cows. The comparison was made with silages cut on each of four dates. The crops were wilted to a dry matter content of at least 256g kg^-1 and no additives were used.
The grass/clover silages were well preserved at all four cuts. The grass was well preserved at three cuts, but, at a May cut, the grass silage was less well preserved and less digestible than the grass/clover silage. When the May silages were fed, milk yield was higher with grass/clover than with grass. Taking the experiment as a whole, however, milk yield and composition were similar on the two diets. The grass/clover silages had a lower proportion of cell wall and their intake by dairy cows was consistently higher than that of the grass silages.
It is concluded that perennial ryegrass/white clover crops can be ensiled successfully and fed successfully, with high intake, to lactating dairy cows, but it should not be assumed that cows will give more milk than when fed equivalent all-grass silage.     

Effect of increasing plant maturity in timothy‐dominated grass silage on the performance of growing/finishing Norwegian Red bulls

An investigation was made of the potential for attaining high daily live weight (LW) gain, high feeding efficiency and carcass quality in Norwegian Red (NRF) bulls fed grass silage harvested at early stages of maturity, supplemented with minimal amounts of concentrates. Roundbale silage was produced from timothy‐dominated swards harvested at three stages of maturity: stages 1 and 2 were dominated by tillers in stem elongation with two and three visible nodes, respectively, and stage 3 by tillers at early heading, with visible heads, but without head stems. Crops were wilted rapidly and a formic acid‐based additive applied. All silages were preserved with restricted fermentation. Silage DOMD values were 0·747, 0·708 and 0·647 for harvesting time (H) 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Silages were fed ad libitum as sole feed, or supplemented with 2–4 kg concentrate at increasing LW, to six bulls per treatment from age 7 months (288 kg) to slaughter at 575 kg. Daily LW gain for bulls fed unsupplemented silage was 1423, 1262 and 936 g, respectively, for H1, H2 and H3, and 1570, 1567 and 1357 g for supplemented bulls. For concentrate‐supplemented bulls, higher energy intake increased proportions of carcass fat more for H1 (0·163) than for H2 (0·134) but the same amount of energy was retained in the carcass per MJ net energy growth intake for these two groups. It is concluded that, apart from milk and concentrate fed to calves during the first months, an intensive beef production with NRF bulls finished before 15 months of age may be based entirely on local grass resources.     

An evaluation of an inoculant/enzyme preparation as an additive for grass silage for dairy cattle

Herbage from the first regrowth of perennial ryegrass-based swards was directly ensiled after treatment with a bacterial inoculant/enzyme preparation (SIL-ALL, Alltech UK) at 3·0 1 t^?1, formic acid (850 g kg^?1) at 2·59 1 t^?1 or no additive (Control). The mean dry matter (DM) and water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations of the grass were 185 and 24·0 g kg^?1 (fresh basis) respectively. Lactic acid concentrations after ensiling increased at a lower rate in formic acid-treated herbage than with the other treatments. All silages were well preserved and formic acid-treated silage had a lower ultimate concentration of lactic acid and higher concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate. Effluent output was increased on a proportional basis by ?0·06 with formic treatment, whereas the inoculant reduced effluent output by 0·05 in comparison with the mean effluent production of the control silage. The in vivo digestibilities of the silages were determined using sheep. The digestibilities of DM, organic matter and energy were significantly higher with inoculant-treated silage than with formic acid treatment, whereas values for the control silage were intermediate. The three silages were offered ad libitum to forty dairy cows with individual recording of daily intakes for a 10-week period in a randomized block experiment with four treatments. Sixteen animals were offered the control silage with half of these offered 3 kg concentrates per day (C3) and the other half offered 7 kg concentrates per day (C7). Twelve animals were allocated to each of the additive-treated silages, with concentrates offered at 5 kg d^?1. Treatment effects on animal performance were measured in weeks 7–10. To compare animal performance for the treated silages with the control, an estimate of performance at 5 kg concentrates per day was obtained by regression using values obtained at 3 and 7 kg concentrates. In comparison with estimated silage intake for the control silage with 5 kg d^?1 concentrates, inoculant and formic acid treatment of the silages increased dry matter intake by 0·04 (P > 0·05) and 0·13 (P > 0·01) respectively. In comparison with estimated milk production and yield of fat plus protein for the control treatment with 5 kg d^?1 concentrates, neither inoculant treatment nor formic acid treatment produced any significant differences.     

SILAGE AND MILK PRODUCTION. A COMPARISON BETWEEN WILTED GRASS SILAGES MADE WITH AND WITHOUT FORMIC ACID

Fonr grass sUages made in May from the same herbage were compared io a 16-week feeding experiment with 12 Ayrshire cows. The silages were made from herhage wilted for either 1 or 2 days, and with or without ¹/₂ gal formic acid per ton of herhage. The silages treated with acid were, on average, 5°C cooler than the untreated silages, had lower pH values, higher lactic acid contents, slightly higher DM and crude protein contents, and higher contents of digestible organic matter in the DM. The silages were fed ad lib. with a supplement of harley and groundnut cake. The intakes of silage DM were higher with the acid-treated than with the nntreated silage. The mean daily milk yields on the silages made with and without the acid additive were 35.4 and 33.1 lb (16.1 and 15.0 kg), respectively, for the silage, wilted for 1 day and 34.2 and 32.2 lb (15.5 and 14.6 kg) for the silage wilted for 2 days. The effects of the treatments on the composition of the milk were small. It is concluded that the silages treated with formic acid additive were superior to the nntreated silages as a feed for dairy cows.     

SILAGE AND MILK PRODUCTION, A COMPARISON BETWEEN WILTED AND UNWILTED GRASS SILAGES MADE WITH AND WITHOUT FORMIC ACID

Three grass silages, all made in mid-Jnne from the same herbage, were compared in a 12-week winter-feeding experiment with 12 Ayrshire cows. The silages were fed ad lib. with a supplement of moist barley and gronndnut cake. Silage A was made from unwilted berbage with no additive, silage B from identical berbage treated with 1/2 gal of formic acidJton (2.24 L/tonne) of berbage, and silage C from the herbage after wilting for 28 b. the DM contents of silages A, B and C were 20.5, 21.1 and 31.8%, respectively, and the contents of digestible organic matter in the DM were 58.9, 68.8 and 67.8%. Silage and total DM intake were bigbest on the treatment containing silage B. the mean dafly milk yields on the treatments with sflages A, B and C were 35.1, 38.0 and 34.3 Ib (15.9, 17.2 and 15.6 kg), respectively and the solids-not-fat (S.N.F.) contents of the milk averaged 8.53, 8.54 and 8.50%. It is concluded tbat silage B, the unwilted silage with formic-acid additive, was superior to botb the untreated and the wilted silage as a feed for dairy cows.     

An evaluation of a high-quality grass silage for milk production

Forty British Friesian cows with a mean calving date of 28 January were used in a randomized block design experiment to evaluate a high-quality grass silage for milk production. The high-quality silage was made from two consecutive cuts of a perennial ryegrass sward after regrowth intervals of 37 days, wilted to 51% dry matter, finely chopped and ensiled using 2.2 1 t^-1 (0.5 gallons per ton) of formic acid. The resulting silage had a dry matter digestibility of 72.9% and was fed ad libitum with 3.8 kg (8.4 lb) concentrates as a supplement. A medium-quality grass silage, of lower digestibility and dry matter content (70.0 and 25.4% respectively), was also fed ad libitum in addition to either 3.8, 5.7 or 7.6 kg (8.4, 12.5 or 16.7 lb) concentrates. The feeding treatments were commenced immediately after calving and were terminated on 9 April giving a mean period of 72 d on the treatments. Over the experimental period the animals on the high-quality silage consumed 15% more silage dry matter and produced 8% more milk that those on the medium-quality silage with the same level of concentrate supplementation. From the results it was estimated that 1.9 kg (4.3 lb) of additional concentrates would be required with the medium-quality silage to give an equivalent milk output to that achieved with the high-quality silage. Milk composition, liveweight change, ration digestibility and nitrogen balance data are also presented.     

Mycotoxins in farm silages – a 2‐year Irish national survey

Toxicogenic fungal moulds have been previously identified in Irish farm silages and are known to be capable of producing mycotoxins. Mycotoxins are detrimental to animal health and performance and can be transferred through feed to animal produce. The objectives of this study were to identify and quantify the challenge posed to livestock from mycotoxins in Irish silages and determine whether conventional chemical characteristics could be used as indicators of mycotoxin occurrence. Over the 2‐year period, 300 silages were sampled on 150 farms and these consisted of round‐baled grass silages (n = 115) and pit silages of either grass (n = 175) or maize (n = 10). There was no significant difference in mycotoxin concentrations across silage types in either year, except for baled silage containing higher concentrations of enniatin B compared with pit silage in Year 1. Conventional chemical characteristics of silages were generally not reliable predictors for mycotoxin incidences; however, dry‐matter digestibility, crude protein, fermentation products and ash did predict the incidence of enniatins and beauvericin. The incidence and concentration of the twenty measured mycotoxins were generally low and individual mycotoxin concentrations recorded were considerably lower than current EU directive or guidance thresholds. Non‐regulated mycotoxins measured were similar to or lower than concentrations reported in the literature. Based on current knowledge and the concentrations of individual mycotoxins detected in this study, the challenge to Irish livestock and livestock products from animal consuming silage is generally low. However, the additive or synergistic effects of multiple mycotoxins in silage are unknown.     

Effect of forage species and ensiling conditions on silage composition and quality and the feed choice behaviour of goats

The hypothesis was that forage species and ensiling conditions have an impact on the formation of biogenic amines and the feed choice of goats in short‐term preference trials. At ensiling, lucerne (Medicago sativa L., first cut), red clover (Trifolium pratense L., first cut) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam ., second cut) were treated differently to obtain a range of fermentation qualities. Six treatments of each forage species were prepared and included different dry‐matter concentrations, chemical and biological silage additives, and additions of soil. Silages were sampled for chemical analyses (proximate constituents, fermentation products and other volatile compounds, crude protein fractions and biogenic amines) and stored anaerobically in vacuum‐sealed plastic bags for use in preference trials (one trial for each forage species) with Saanen‐type wethers (n = 8 or 6). Each possible two‐way combination of the six silage treatments and a standard hay (n = 21 combinations) was offered for ad libitum intake for 3 hr. Data were analysed using multidimensional scaling, analysis of variance and correlation analysis between silage characteristics and dry‐matter intake (DMI). For each forage species, fermentation characteristics and crude protein fractions revealed only small differences among treatments. Although the degree of proteolysis, as measured by non‐protein nitrogen, of all silages was high, biogenic amine and butyric acid concentrations were low. The different treatments apparently had no direct influence on the formation of biogenic amines and feed choice. The preference behaviour within one forage species was strongly divergent, but DMI rankings of the three species were very similar.     

Effectiveness of chopped lucerne hay as a moisture absorbent for low dry‐matter maize silage: Effluent reduction,fermentation quality and intake by sheep

This study determined effects of addition of lucerne hay (LH) as moisture absorbent on effluent reduction, fermentation and subsequent intake of maize (corn) silage by sheep. Treatments included maize forage ensiled without LH (LH0), with 50 g/kg LH (LH5) and with 100 g/kg LH (LH10) on a fresh weight basis. Silages were made in 150‐kg bags in triplicate. Upon opening, representative samples from each bag were taken twice weekly during a feeding trial and used for laboratory analyses in a completely randomized design. Silages were fed ad libitum to six ewes in a duplicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with 21‐day periods for intake and digestibility determination. Lucerne hay incorporation linearly increased DM, ash, water‐soluble carbohydrates, buffering capacity and pH of silages, while it linearly decreased ammonia nitrogen, acetic acid and ethanol concentrations (p < .05). Effluent volume linearly decreased from 33 ml/kg in LH0 to 0.8 ml/kg in LH10. Addition of LH resulted in a linear increase in intakes of organic matter and fibre in ewes, while digestibilities of these nutrients linearly decreased (p < .05). Lucerne hay addition improved fermentation parameters and resulted in increased intake of maize silage without having negative impact on aerobic stability.     

SILAGE AND MILK PRODUCTION, A COMPARISON BETWEEN GRASS SILAGES MADE WITH AND WITHOUT FORMIC ACID

Two grass sUages made in June and two made in September, all from the same field, were compared in a 16-week winter-feeding experiment with 12 Ayrshire cows. The silages were fed ad lib. with a supplement of barley and groundnut eake. One of the sUages made in June and one made in September had been treated with 1/2 gallon of formie acid per ton of herbage when cut, whereas the other two silages were untreated. The contents of digestible organic matter in the silage DM made with and without the acid additive were 67.4 and 63.8%, respectively, in the June silage, and 66-1 and 62.7% in the September silage. The intakes of silage and total DM were higher in the treatments containing the acid-treated silages than in those containing the untreated silages. The mean daily milk yields from cows fed on the sUages made with and without the additive were 36.3 and 33.8 lb (16.5 and 15.3 kg), respectively, for silages made in June, and 35.4 and 34.1 lb (16.0 and 15.5 kg) for those made in September. The solids-not-fat (S.N.F.) contents of the milk averaged 8.60 and 8.50% respectively, from the silages with and without the additive. It is concluded that the silage with the formic-acid additive was superior to the untreated silage as a feed for dairy cows.     

Grass silage as a basic feed for store lambs. 1. Effect of wilting, chop length and stage of maturity of grass silage on intake and performance of store lambs

Two experiments were carried out with grass silages cut at a leafy (Experiment 1) and a more mature (Experiment 2) stage of growth to evaluate the effect of wilting and chop length on silage intake and performance of store lambs. In each experiment, the herbage was cut with a rotary mower and was either ensiled within 24 h as unwilled silage (U) or wilted for 1–3 d (W). Each silage type was harvested with either a double-chop harvester (D) or a precision-chop harvester (P). All silages were treated with formic acid at 3 1 t^?1 and were well preserved. The silages were fed ad libitum to Suffolk crossbred store lambs (twenty-four lambs per treatment) without any supplement over a period of 8 or 9 weeks. Wilting of the silages had little effect on silage intake (797 vs. 809g dry matter (DM) d^?1) or on lamb performance in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, wilting of the D silage increased silage DM intake (589 vs. 534 g DM d^?1; +10%) and reduced the extent of liveweight losses. Wilting of the P silage reduced silage intake (770 vs. 791g DM d^?1; -3%) and reduced liveweight gains. In Experiment 1 intakes of the D silages were 650–667g DM d^?1 and just maintained lamb live weights. Intakes of the P silages were 39–49% higher than the D silages (927–968 g DM d^?1) and increased liveweight gains. In Experiment 2 intakes of the D silages were 534–589 g DM d^?1 and resulted in a loss in lamb live weight. Precision-chopping increased silage intakes by 31–48% (770–791 DM d^?1)in Experiment 2 and improved lamb liveweight gains. Lamb performance was higher on the UP silage than on the WP silage. The rumen retention lime (RRT), estimated from the rumen contents of the lambs at slaughter and their silage intake before slaughter, was much shorter for the lambs fed on the P silages (12.6–20.6 h) than those fed on the D silages (21.4–29.3 h) in each experiment. Silage intake and liveweight gain were positively related to silage in vivo DM digestibility (DMD), whereas RRT was negatively related to DMD. However, there were distinct differences between the P and D silages in the elevation and, to a lesser extent, in the slope of the regression lines, indicating that intake of D silage was limited by factors other than the digestibility of the silage The results of this study show that the chop length of grass silage had a far greater effect on intake and on lamb performance than silage digestibility, whereas wilting had little or no effect.     

The influence of forage quality and concentrate level on dry matter intake and milk production of British Friesian heifers

Thirty-six British Friesian heifers were divided into two groups during weeks 3-26 of lactation and received ad libitum either good (G) or average (A) quality grass silage. The in vitro digestible organic matter in the DM was 680 and 600 g kg^-1 for silages G and A, respectively. In addition, the heifers in each group were offered concentrate at either a low (4.3 kg DM d^-1), medium (64 kg DM d^-1) or high (8.4 kg DM d^-1) level. The concentrate contained 180 g (kg DM)^-1 of crude protein and had a calculated metabolizable energy concentration of 12.9 MJ (kg DM)^-1. Increasing concentrate level significantly increased milk yield (P < 0.01), milk protein concentration (P < 0.05), and yield of both milk protein depressed milk fat concentration (P < 0.001) and silage intake (P < 0.001). Although the overall effect of silage quality on milk yield was not significant, the milk yields for silage G at each concentrate level were higher, significantly so for low level, than the corresponding values for silage A. An improvement in silage quality did not affect milk fat concentration but significantly increased the concentration of milk protein (P < 005) and yields of both milk fat (P < 005) and protein (P < 0001). The response of silage DM intake to improved silage quality was 0 06 kg DM per 10 g rise in vitro DOMD value. Each additional kg concentrate DM depressed intake of silages G and A by 0-63 and 0-27 kg DM, respectively. Substitution rate was also significantly related to stage of lactation. With both silages, the digestibility coefficients determined in vivo for acid detergent fibre (ADF) decreased significantly (P < 0.001) when concentrate level was increased from low to high. Differences for DM, OM and total N digestibility coefficients between treatments were not established as significant at the 5% level. Estimates of mean efficiency of utilization of ME for lactation, made on a weekly basis, were 049 and 052 for the heifers given silages G and A. respectively, and 048, 052 and 052 for those given the low, medium and high levels of concentrate. Energy balances were calculated on a mean weekly basis.     

Effect of stage of maturity and chop length on the chemical composition and utilization of formic acid-treated ryegrass and formic acid silage by sheep

Two areas of an early-heading perennial ryegrass cv. Cropper were harvested by either a precision-chop or a flail harvester at around 50% ear emergence (15 May 1978) and 14d later (29 May). Formic acid (85%) was applied at the rate of 2·2 litres t^-1. Mature crossbred wethers were used in a 2 × 2 factorial design to determine the effect of stage of maturity and method of harvesting (chop length) on the in vivo digestibilities of formic acid-treated grass in experiment 1 and formic acid silage in experiment 2. Apparent digestibility coefficients were determined at a fixed level of feeding for both grass and silage and at ad libitum access to feed for silage only. There were no significant differences in the concentrations of crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), acid-detergent fibre (ADF) or acid-detergent lignin (ADL) in grass or silages of differing chop lengths but the later cut forages had significantly higher ADF and ADL concentrations and lower CP concentrations than the early-cut forages. The ADF and ADL concentrations were also higher in the silages than in the corresponding grasses. In general, the fermentation characteristics of precision-chopped silage were better than for the corresponding flail-cut silage but date of harvest was a more important determinant of quality and the late, flail-cut silage had the highest butyrate and ammonia N concentrations and the highest pH (411) of any treatment. There was a significantly higher intake of precision-chopped as compared with flail-cut silage with both the early-and the late-cut silage but there were no significant differences attributable to stage of maturity (i.e. date of harvest) or significant interaction between chop length and maturity. The slightly increased intake of early harvested, precision-chopped silage as compared with late precision-chopped silage was not significant. Dry matter digestibility (DMD) of the grass decreased at a rate of 0004 units d^-1 post 50% ear emergence. The results of experiment 2 indicated a decrease of 0·207 units d^-1 in silage fed at a similar level. The late-cut silage (DMD 0·292, mean of both harvesting treatments) thus had a significantly lower digestibility than the corresponding grass (mean DMD 0·247). Chop length had a variable influence on the DMD of both grass and silage fed at a fixed level but treatment differences were non-significant. However, a trend towards higher digestibility of flail-cut as compared with precision-chopped silage was apparent and this became statistically significant when the animals were allowed ad libitum access to feed. This may be a response to the generally lower intake of flail-cut silage.