Mehlich3方法与常规方法测定土壤养分相关性初步研究

采取Mehlich3(以下简称M3法)方法和常规标准方法测定了41个土壤样品的有效磷、速效钾、交换性钙、交换性镁、有效铁、有效锰、有效铜、有效锌和有效硼。通过对两种方法测定结果的分析,探讨二者的相关性。土壤有效磷M3方法与常规方法相关系数达到0.9085,为最高,有效铜M3方法与常规方法相关系数为0.1556,为最低。有效铜、有效硼测定结果的相关性很差。M3方法与常规方法测定土壤养分在有效磷、速效钾、交换性钙、交换性镁、有效铁、有效锰、有效锌上达到极显著水平,其数值可以通过回归方程相互转换利用。     

常规浸提剂与联合浸提剂测定我国北方石灰性土壤有效磷钾的比较

使用常规浸提剂与两种联合浸提剂Mehlich 3(M3)、ASI分别测定了中国8个地区10种土壤样品的有效磷、速效钾含量,分析比较了常规浸提剂与两种联合浸提剂测定土壤有效磷速效钾的差异性及相关性。统计分析表明,对于有效磷,M3、ASI两种联合浸提剂的浸提结果均大于常规浸提剂的浸提结果,且M3浸提剂浸提结果的变幅较常规浸提剂浸提结果相对较小,而精确度较高。相关分析表明,常规浸提结果与M3浸提结果呈极显著正相关(P0.01),相关系数为0.680。对于速效钾,M3浸提剂的浸提量较常规浸提剂相近,常规浸提量与M3浸提量呈极显著正相关(P0.01),相关系数为0.996。综合而言,M3这种联合浸提剂是测定土壤有效磷、速效钾的理想浸提方法。     

Mehlich 3法与常规分析方法在测定土壤有效P、K的比较研究

采用Mehlich 3法和常规分析方法测定赤红土和红土的有效磷、有效钾,结果表明,Mehlich 3法测得的有效磷、有效钾与常规方法测定的呈显著的相关。赤红土上的玉米生物试验结果表明:Mehilch 3法测定的土壤有效磷、有效钾含量与玉米吸收的磷、钾量以及玉米的株高、干重呈显著相关。     

Mehlich 3-ICP法快速测定土壤有效磷的研究

选取59个典型的土壤样品进行研究,比较了Mehlich 3-ICP法与常规方法测定土壤有效磷结果之间的差异,为其在土壤测试方面的应用提供科学依据。结果表明,Mehlich 3-ICP法测定不同类型土壤有效磷与常规方法之间的相关系数r达到0.959**~1.000**,均呈极显著相关性。对于Mehlich 3方法提取的土壤有效磷,采用ICP-AES法与钼锑抗比色法的定量结果之间r值为0.999**,达到极显著水平。ICP-AES法测定结果约是比色法的1.18倍,这可能与ICP定量的磷中不仅包括了无机磷的浓度,还包括少量的有机态磷有关。     

山西石灰性土壤速效磷、钾测定方法的比较

用M ehlich3通用浸提剂法对山西石灰性土壤速效磷、钾的含量进行了测定,并与常规方法进行比较。结果表明:M ehlich3法与常规土壤速效磷、钾测定方法的测定结果呈显著正相关性。磷的替代性较差,钾的替代性较好,且两元素之间可以相互换算。     

关中平原台塬区土壤养分空间格局研究——以西安市长安区为例

为研究关中平原台塬区土壤养分的空间分布情况,加强精准农业施肥管理,针对陕西省西安市长安区836.69 km²范围内的土壤养分元素进行空间格局研究。通过GPS定位选取研究区内3 231个土壤采样点,测定了土壤样品的有机质、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾以及pH值,并利用地统计法对其空间变异结构及格局现状进行研究。结果表明:土壤养分元素的变异系数范围为0.09～0.84,其变异程度依次为有效磷>速效钾>碱解氮>有机质>pH值;土壤有机质、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾及pH值的变异函数曲线均符合指数模型;在空间结构上,土壤有效磷和有机质属于弱相关性,速效钾和碱解氮为中等强度相关性,pH值具有强烈的空间相关性;采用Kriging插值方法,可直观得到研究区域的土壤养分空间格局情况。     

高原耕地土壤养分空间分布与影响因子相关性研究

综合运用GIS地统计分析和空间分析技术,以保山市隆阳区为代表区域研究高原坝区耕地土壤主要养分的空间变异规律,及其与土类、地形因子间的关系。结果表明:研究区内土壤pH、有机质、碱解氮、速效钾表现出中等程度的空间相关性。有效磷变异系数最大,空间自相关性较强。各指标在不同土类间差异均达极显著水平:潴育型水稻土中pH值、有机质、碱解氮含量较高;黄壤中有效磷含量最低,速效钾最高;红壤中有机质含量最低。土壤养分受地形因子影响明显,pH、有机质、碱解氮和速效钾与海拔均呈显著的正相关;有效磷与海拔呈负相关;坡度与pH、有机质、碱解氮、有效磷均呈负相关,与速效钾正相关。坡向与各指标相关性均不显著。本研究可为科学耕地施肥,合理土地改良及利用提供依据,对高原稀缺耕地的可持续和高效利用具有重要意义。     

无土栽培基质速效钾测定方法的比较

将4种土壤速效钾测定方法用于无土栽培基质中速效钾的测定,测定结果经统计分析表明,2 mol.L-1冷HNO3、Mehlich3和ASI 3种方法与1mol.L-1中性NH4OAc法测定的速效钾存在极显著的相关性,并且在显著水平α=0.05,ASI法与Mehlich3法的速效钾测定结果没有显著性差异。这两种方法都可以用于无土栽培基质速效钾的测定。     

基于土壤类型和微量元素辅助信息的土壤属性空间模拟

为探讨大尺度区域土壤属性空间化的方法,以吉林省为例,研究土壤养分（pH值、有机质、速效磷、速效钾和碱解氮）和地形地貌、微量元素等变量之间的关系;并在考虑土壤类型基础上,将相关性较高的变量作为协因子进行土壤养分的Cokriging插值研究。结果表明,pH值与经度、有效铁、锰和速效氮的相关系数分别高达-0.66、-0.71、-0.70和-0.67;有机质与经度、pH值、有效钙、锰的相关系数分别为0.55、-0.58、0.56和0.52;碱解氮与经度、纬度、pH值、有效铁、锌的相关系数分别为0.57、-0.57、-0.67、0.56、0.54;速效磷与速效钾、有效锌的相关系数分别为0.67和0.64。分析发现以相关性较高的微量元素作为协因子进行Cokriging插值精度均优于采用地形变量作为协因子的Cokriging插值。交叉检验和检验站验证结果表明,与普通Kriging相比,基于土壤类型和微量元素的Cokriging插值在增加估值精度方面有所提高。     

豫中植烟区土壤速效养分的空间变异分析

利用地统计学和GIS相结合的方法,探讨了豫中烤烟种植区土壤速效氮、磷、钾含量空间变异特征。结果表明:研究区速效氮含量属于偏低水平,而速效钾和速效磷为偏高水平。以速效氮的变异系数为最小,速效磷的变异系数为最大。土壤 pH与速效氮和速效磷都成呈显著的正相关关系,土壤有机质与速效氮、速效磷和速效钾都达到极显著的正相关关系。研究区3种土壤速效养分中,除了速效氮为线性模型外,速效钾和速效磷都是球状模型。速效磷和速效钾属于中等强度的空间变异性,而速效氮属于弱的空间相关性。本烤烟种植区土壤速效养分的等值线图可更准确和直观地了解研究区土壤养分的空间分布,从而为精确施肥提供依据。     

无土栽培基质速效磷测定方法的研究

将4种土壤速效磷测定方法 [Olsen法(常规方法)、Bary1法、ASI法、Mehlich3法]用于无土栽培基质速效磷的测定,结果表明:在显著水平α=0.05,ASI法与Olsen法测定的速效磷没有显著性差异,而Bary1法和Meh-lich3法与Olsen法测定的速效磷存在极显著性差异,故ASI法可用于无土栽培基质速效磷的测定。     

Determination of Soil Available Phosphorus using the Olsen and Mehlich 3 Methods for Greek Soils Having Variable Amounts of Calcium Carbonate

The Mehlich 3 method for the determination of available phosphorus (P) is less laborious compared to the Olsen method and provides the advantage of multielement analysis. However, in Greece the Olsen P method is currently used because of its suitability for calcareous soils. The aims of this study were to compare (a) the Mehlich 3 and Olsen methods for 200 soils having different levels of pH and calcium carbonate and (b) Mehlich 3 colorimetric and Mehlich 3 inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis for 17 acidic and 23 alkaline soils. The correlation of Mehlich 3 P and Olsen P methods, excluding soils with pH less than 5 and soils with calcium carbonate levels from 10.3 to 48.3%, resulted in a linear slope of 0.24 and r² of 0.82, and thus for this range of soils the Mehlich 3 test provided a more reliable measurement of P compared to the Olsen method. This study confirms also previous results that show that Mehlich 3 ICP test measures more P compared to Mehlich 3 colorimetry.     

基于几种土壤测试方法的华南菜田磷素丰缺指标研究

依托2002—2009年开展的蔬菜田间试验结果,土样分别用Olsen法、Mehlich 1法、Mehlich 3法和ASI法测定其有效磷含量,建立上述测试方法的菜田土壤磷素丰缺指标,并进行不同测试方法的相关研究。以蔬菜产量＜75%、75%～90%、90%～95%和＞95%为标准,将菜田土壤有效磷分为“低”、“中”、“高”和“极高”4个肥力等级; 对应的土壤有效磷丰缺指标Olsen-P为＜23、23～59、59～81和＞81 mg/kg; M1-P为＜19、19～102、102～179和＞179 mg/kg; M3-P为＜19、19～96、96～165和＞165 mg/kg; ASI-P为＜22、22～68、68～98和＞98 mg/kg。Olsen法、M3法、M1法和ASI法4种方法,两两的相关性均达到极显著水平。     

Determination of Soil-Available Micronutrients using the DTPA and Mehlich 3 Methods for Greek Soils Having Variable Amounts of Calcium Carbonate

The Mehlich 3 method for the extraction of available micronutrients, such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn), is more advantageous compared to the diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) method, because it can also be used for the extraction of macronutrients. The aim of this study was to compare the Mehlich 3 and DTPA methods for 172 soils in Greece having different levels of pH and calcium carbonate. Single and multiple regression analyses were employed to evaluate the relationship between Mehlich 3 and DTPA tests. Mehlich 3 results correlated well with DTPA-extractable Cu and Zn, but the correlation was poor for DTPA-extractable Mn. Also, a high correlation was found between Mehlich 3 and DTPA-extractable Fe for calcareous soils (R² = 0.89), while a moderate relationship was found for noncalcareous soils (R² = 0.65), which was improved to 0.78 when the pH was taken into account in multiple regression analysis.     

Soil Phosphorus Extracted by Bray 1 and Mehlich 3 Soil Tests as Affected by the Soil/Solution Ratio in Mollisols

Different relationships between soil-test methods results have been reported in several agricultural regions. Differences in the same soil-test procedure (e.g., soil/solution ratio) exist between soil-testing laboratories from different agricultural regions. Our objectives were to (1) determine the effect of soil/solution ratio on the amount of phosphorus removed by Bray 1 and Mehlich 3 methods, (2) compare the amounts of phosphorus removed by Bray 1 and Mehlich 3 in Mollisols from the Pampean region, and (3) determine whether soil/solution ratio affects the relationship between Bray 1 and Mehlich 3. Soil phosphorus availability was determined with two extractants (Bray 1 and Mehlich 3), using two soil/solution ratios (1:10 and 1:8, wt/v) in 72 soils (noncalcareous, loess-derived Molisolls) from the Pampean region. The amount of phosphorus removed was 20–24% greater when using 1:10 than 1:8 (wt/v) soil/solution ratio. This effect was significantly greater in Bray 1 than in Mehlich 3 (p = 0.04). When compared using the same soil/solution ratio, Mehlich 3 removed 4 to 8% more phosphorus than Bray 1. The soil/solution ratio used in the comparison affected the relationship between both extractants. The difference between extractants was slightly greater with a soil/solution ratio of 1:8 than of 1:10 (p = 0.03). Our results showed that even when using the same method, changes in the procedure (like soil/solution ratio) may cause different soil-test results and also differences in the relationship between two extracting solutions. Therefore, reported relationships between two methods are only valid for the soils and region where the relationship was developed and should not be extrapolated to other regions, even with similar soils.     

Comparison of extractable phosphorus from two sulfuric acid methods with the Mehlich phosphorus test number one

Abstract

All mineral phosphates in soil dissolve more completely when HCl is mixed with H₂SO₄ than with the HCl alone. It was hypothesized that a new extracting solution of H₂SO₄ alone with the same ionic strength or the same acidity as the Mehlich P1 extractant would extract similar amounts of soil phosphorus (P) as the Mehlich P1 soil test. Thirty six acid soils from Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Colorado were used in this study. These acid soils reflect wide ranges in parent materials, texture, pH, organic matter, and available soil P. They were analyzed for available soil P with the Mehlich P1 soil test and with the two H₂SO₄ methods: Method A has an extracting solution of same ionic strength (0.0875M) as the Mehlich P1 extractant, and Method B was an extracting solution of the same acidity (0.0375M) as the Mehlich P1 extractant. Correlations between the results of Mehlich P1 with Method A and Method B were 0.994 and 0.997, respectively. The measured test precision was <3.5% for all three methods. The new H₂SO₄ methods are simple and faster to conduct under routine operations than the original Mehlich P1 extractant, and because of the high correlations, the H₂SO₄ methods should predict crop response to P as well as the original Mehlich P1 extractant for acid soils.     

Comparison of extractants for the determination of available phosphorus,potassium, calcium,magnesium and sodium in some Ethiopian and German soils

Abstract

A study was conducted with the purpose of comparing the efficiency of Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, and calcium acetate lactate (CAL) extractants for the deter‐ mination of available phosphorus (P) and exchangeable cations [potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sodium (Na)] on 22 Ethiopian and 10 German agricultural soils. The Olsen and NH₄OAc extractants were used as standards against which P and exchangeable cations values were compared. Results showed that, in general, highly significant correlations were found between all of the methods for available P and exchangeable cations determination on the Ethiopian soils. The highest correlation was, however, found with the Mehlich 3 extractant. On the ten soils from Germany, the Olsen method did not give significant cor‐ relation with the CAL method for P determination. The CAL and Mehlich 3 extrac‐ tants were also not good indicators of Na availability when compared with the NH₄OAc method. It can be generalized that the Mehlich 3 is a suitable extractant for P, K, Ca, Mg, and Na in Ethiopian soils, but further study is recommended to confirm these findings under field conditions.