FC‐36 The use of immunostimulatory bacterial DNA sequences in allergen‐specific immunotherapy of canine atopic dermatitis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a combination of immunostimulatory bacterial DNA sequences and allergen‐specific immunotherapy for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis. Seven dogs with nonseasonal atopic dermatitis diagnosed by history, clinical signs and exclusion of differential diagnoses were included. All dogs had been on allergen‐specific immunotherapy for at least 12 months with incomplete responses, were on additional antipruritic therapy and showed residual pruritus. Pruritus was marked by the owner on a visual analogue scale, lesions were determined by a clinician using the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI), and concurrent medications were recorded before entering the study and after 14 weeks of treatment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and cultured; canine cytokine message for IFNγ, IL‐4, TNF and IL‐10 was quantitated using RT‐PCR. A mixture of allergen extract and liposome‐DNA complexes was injected intradermally at the beginning of the study and after 2, 4, 6, 10 and 14 weeks. CADESI, pruritus and medication scores, and cytokine messages at the beginning and end of the study were compared with a paired t‐test. There were significant improvements in pruritus scores (P = 0.0277). Reductions in medication scores and CADESI were not statistically significant. IL‐4 production decreased significantly (P = 0.0428); decreases in other cytokines were not significant. Although the number of dogs in this pilot study was small, the results warrant further investigation of a combination of immunostimulatory bacterial DNA sequences and allergen‐specific immunotherapy for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis. Funding: Self‐funded.     

Rush allergen specific immunotherapy protocol in feline atopic dermatitis: a pilot study of four cats

Rush immunotherapy has been shown to be as safe as conventional immunotherapy in canine atopic patients. Rush immunotherapy has not been reported in the feline atopic patient. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine a safe protocol for rush immunotherapy in feline atopic patients. Four atopic cats diagnosed by history, physical examination and exclusion of appropriate differential diagnoses were included in the study. Allergens were identified via liquid phase immunoenzymatic testing (VARL: Veterinary Allergy Reference Labs, Pasadena, CA). Cats were premedicated with 1.5 mg triamcinolone orally 24 and 2 h prior to first injection and 10 mg hydroxyzine PO 24, 12 and 2 h prior to first injection. An intravenous catheter was placed prior to first injection. Allergen extracts (Greer Laboratories, Lenoir, North Carolina) were all administered subcutaneously at increasing protein nitrogen units (pnu) every 30 minutes for 5 h to maintenance dose of 15,000 pnus ml-1. Vital signs were assessed every 15 minutes. Two cats developed mild pruritus and the subsequent injection was delayed 30 minutes. No changes in either cat's vital signs were noted, nor was there any further pruritus. All four cats successfully completed rush immunotherapy. Two cats developed a dermal swelling on the dorsal neck one week later. In these four cats, this protocol appeared to be a safe regimen to reach maintenance therapy. A larger sample of feline patients is needed to determine the incidence of adverse reactions and to follow the success of ASIT based upon this method of induction.     

Masitinib for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study

There is an on-going need to identify medications suitable for the long-term treatment of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD). Masitinib mesilate is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the c-KIT receptor. A strong relationship exists between the SCF/c-KIT pathway and pathogenesis of CAD, suggesting that masitinib may potentially fulfil the above role. This study reports on an uncontrolled pilot study of masitinib in CAD. Masitinib was administered orally to 11 dogs at a mean dose of 11.0 ± 1.83 mg/kg/day (free base) for 28 days. Treatment response was assessed by evolution of clinical appearance according to a modified version of the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (mCADESI), pruritus scale and surface area of lesions. Masitinib improved CAD with a mean reduction in mCADESI of 50.7 ± 29.8% (95% C.I. = 29.4–72.0; p = 0.0004) at day 28 relative to baseline, with 8/10, 8/10 and 4/10 dogs showing improvement of ≥33%, ≥40% and ≥50%, respectively. Improvement was further evidenced by a decrease in pruritus score and the surface area of lesions. No serious or severe adverse events occurred during this trial, although 6/11 dogs presented with mild to moderate treatment related adverse events. There is sufficient compelling evidence to warrant further investigation.     

益生菌对犬异位性皮炎免疫调节机制的研究

本试验对使用益生菌治疗的21只异位性皮炎犬和9只健康犬进行调查,通过流式细胞术检测其外周血淋巴细胞FoxP3表达(即Treg的生成),ELISA试剂盒检测血清IL-10、TGF-β、IFN-γ和IgE浓度,并比较治疗前后患犬的瘙痒程度。结果表明,服用特殊益生菌使犬外周血淋巴细胞FoxP3表达升高,血清IL-10和IgE浓度分别升高和下降。且通过提高Treg细胞的数量控制异位性皮炎的发病。     

A prospective study on canine atopic dermatitis and food-induced allergic dermatitis in Switzerland

Canine atopic dermatitis sensu stricto and food-induced allergic dermatitis are common canine skin conditions, which are often considered clinically undistinguishable. Several attempts have been made to describe populations of atopic dogs and determine breed predisposition but the results were often biased by the use of hospital populations as control group. The present study aims to describe a population of Swiss atopic and food-allergic dogs and to compare it with a data set representing more than 85% of all Swiss dogs. The study, which was carried out during 1 year in several practices and teaching hospital in Switzerland, describes a group of 259 allergic dogs, determines breed predisposition for atopic dermatitis and food-induced allergic dermatitis, compares the clinical signs and features of both conditions, and outlines the clinical picture of five frequently affected breeds.     

Double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot study on the efficacy of zileuton for canine atopic dermatitis

Nine dogs meeting the diagnostic criteria for canine atopic dermatitis were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over clinical trial. In this pilot study, zileuton (a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor) given orally at 2 mg kg(-1) three times daily for 4 weeks significantly decreased erythema in dogs with atopic dermatitis but had no effect on pruritus. Zileuton was well tolerated and no adverse clinical signs were noted. However, one dog developed mild alanine aminotransaminase elevation, which resolved within 1 week of discontinuation of therapy. Monitoring of alanine aminotransaminase may be necessary in dogs receiving zileuton. Further studies with larger number of dogs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of zileuton as treatment for canine atopic dermatitis.     

The effect of nematode administration on canine atopic dermatitis

Canine atopic dermatitis is a common disease and is considered as an animal model of the human disease. Immunomodulation by helminths is reported in several species. The aim of this study was to determine whether nematodes have an immunomodulatory effect on atopic dermatitis in dogs. In the pilot study, 12 atopic dogs were infected with either embryonated eggs of Trichuris vulpis (500 and 2500 eggs in 3 dogs each) or L3 larvae of Uncinaria stenocephala (100, 500 and 2500 eggs in 2 dogs each), respectively, for 3 months. Pruritus was evaluated with visual analogue scales and clinical lesions with the canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index (CADESI). Skin biopsies were obtained for histopathology at the beginning and end of the study. In the subsequent placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised study, 21 dogs received either 2500 embryonated T. vulpis eggs or placebo and were evaluated similarly. In addition, allergen-specific serum IgE concentrations were determined. All dogs in the pilot study improved in their lesion scores, most in their pruritus scores. The cutaneous inflammatory infiltrate did not change significantly. In the subsequent randomised study, there was no significant difference between placebo and Trichuris administration in regard to pruritus or CADESI. IgE concentrations also did not change significantly. Infection with T. vulpis did not significantly change clinical signs of canine atopic dermatitis.     

Tolerability and clinical efficacy of oral immunotherapy with house dust mites in a model of canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, life‐long disease. In humans, immunotherapy (IT) is the only treatment that can alter the course of AD. Oral IT is appealing owing to the ease of administration and the potential for increased compliance. The purposes of this study were to investigate the tolerability, clinical efficacy and effects on allergen‐specific IgE of oral IT using a canine AD model. Thirteen atopic beagles sensitized to house dust mites (HDMs) were randomly divided into two groups. One group received daily oral doses of HDMs while the other group received vehicle only for 7 months. The investigator evaluating the dogs was blinded to the allocation of treatments. Prior to and after 2 and 7 months of IT, dogs were challenged daily with HDMs for 3 days concurrently, and clinical signs were scored using a modified Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI). Prior to and at completion of oral IT, serum was collected for measurement of allergen‐specific IgE. Oral IT was well tolerated, and no adverse effects were noted. Analysis of variance showed no significant effect of time, group and group × time interaction for CADESI scores. In addition, there were no significant differences in allergen‐specific IgE levels. In conclusion, it appears that oral administration of HDMs is well tolerated in these atopic beagles but that this protocol was not sufficient to induce clinical improvement. Further, longer‐term studies will be necessary to explore the potential of oral IT in veterinary medicine.     

Investigation on the use of 0.3% tacrolimus lotion for canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study

The efficacy of 0.3% tacrolimus lotion (maximum dosage: 0.3 mg kg-1 per day) for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) was evaluated. Systemic absorption and effects on complete blood cell counts (CBC) and chemistry panels were also investigated. Eight dogs were assigned randomly to either a tacrolimus or a vehicle lotion treatment group. Both owners and investigator were blinded to the treatment. After 4 weeks, there was a 2-week wash-out period and treatments were reversed. Owners scored pruritus weekly while the investigator scored pruritus and erythema at the beginning and end of each treatment period. Investigator scores for pruritus in the tacrolimus group significantly decreased by the end of the study (P = 0.03). Investigator scores for erythema in the tacrolimus group were significantly lower than those in the placebo group at the end of the study (P = 0.005). There was no difference between groups with respect to owner scores for pruritus. No changes in the CBC and chemistry panels were noted. Mean blood concentrations of tacrolimus were below toxic levels.