共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Johns L 《Science (New York, N.Y.)》1996,273(5278):1031b-1032b
6.
Miller G 《Science (New York, N.Y.)》2011,332(6025):30-31
7.
Miller-Spiegel C 《Science (New York, N.Y.)》2003,299(5609):1013; author reply 1013
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
知识经济与大学自主化 法人化 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
文章论述了知识经济的基本特征,要求大学拥有调整专业结构、课程设置、教学内容等的自主权,要求大学拥有从事商业活动、参与市场竞争、直接创造财富的自主权,要求高等学校在国际交流方面拥有更多的自主权,要求大学拥有人事和管理制度的必要的自主权。在新世纪里,大学必将取得更大的自主权,必将变得开放、灵活、主动、高效,逐步走向社会的中心。 相似文献
14.
15.
David M. Holt 《Agriculture and Human Values》2008,25(2):169-171
I examine the risks and opportunities associated with social movement coalition building in attempts to block or curtail the
rise of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in the United States. As producers have scaled up animal production
facilities, environmentalists and animal rights activists, along with numerous other social actors, have begun anti-CAFO campaigns.
I argue that while the CAFO has mobilized a diverse group of social actors, these individuals and organizations do not all
have the same interests (aside from resistance to CAFOs), leading to some unlikely allies. These odd alliances provide opportunities
for agrifood scholars to study the relationship between the coalitions that social movement organizations form and the support
they receive from their respective constituencies. Lastly, I argue that the need for agrifood scholars to address the pitfalls
associated with single-issue coalition building extends beyond the unlikely alliance between environmentalists and animal
rights activists, as agrifood related crises have led to a proliferation of such coalitions.
相似文献
David M. HoltEmail: |
16.
指出高校知识产权管理工作存在着意识淡薄、管理机构缺失或者不健全、缺少专项资金的支持、专利数量少且质量不高、知识产权流失严重、知识产权的评估很随意等问题,分析了高校知识产权管理工作薄弱的深层次原因,提出了加强高校知识产权管理工作的几点建议。 相似文献
17.
18.
Ann Reisner 《Agriculture and Human Values》1992,9(2):38-53
The animal rights movement is a serious challenge to current agricultural practices. Agriculture's response, in part, depends on how successfully it can mobilize its natural constituency, farmers. However, theories of the mainstream press suggest that the mainstream press generally covers events, rarely reports or adopts the perspective of alternative movements, rarely includes mobilizing information, and suggests that routine social structures can, should, and will contain the movement. Hence, current theory indicates that the mainstream press does not act to mobilize the general public. However, very little research has examined how specialized presses, such as the farm press, respond to movements. The study reported here was based on an analysis of 406 articles from ten farm magazines. The findings suggest that the farm press acted more as an advocacy press than does the mainstream press. Collectively, the farm press articles included as many positions pieces and stories explaining animal rights as an issue as they did event stories. The articles reported, and countered, the positions of the animal rights movement; suggested that routine social structures might not contain the animal rights movement; called for agriculture to mobilize; and included specific recommendations concerning how agriculture should mobilize. 相似文献
19.
20.