Pharmacokinetics of amantadine in cats

Siao, K. T., Pypendop, B. H., Stanley, S. D., Ilkiw, J. E. Pharmacokinetics of amantadine in cats. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34 , 599–604. This study reports the pharmacokinetics of amantadine in cats, after both i.v. and oral administration. Six healthy adult domestic shorthair female cats were used. Amantadine HCl (5 mg/kg, equivalent to 4 mg/kg amantadine base) was administered either intravenously or orally in a crossover randomized design. Blood samples were collected immediately prior to amantadine administration, and at various times up to 1440 min following intravenous, or up to 2880 min following oral administration. Plasma amantadine concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and plasma amantadine concentration–time data were fitted to compartmental models. A two‐compartment model with elimination from the central compartment best described the disposition of amantadine administered intravenously in cats, and a one‐compartment model best described the disposition of oral amantadine in cats. After i.v. administration, the apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment and apparent volume of distribution at steady‐state [mean ± SEM (range)], and the clearance and terminal half‐life [harmonic mean ± jackknife pseudo‐SD (range)] were 1.5 ± 0.3 (0.7–2.5) L/kg, 4.3 ± 0.2 (3.7–5.0) L/kg, 8.2 ± 2.1 (5.9–11.4) mL·min/kg, and 348 ± 49 (307–465) min, respectively. Systemic availability [mean ± SEM (range)] and terminal half‐life after oral administration [harmonic mean ± jackknife pseudo‐SD (range)] were 130 ± 11 (86–160)% and 324 ± 41 (277–381) min, respectively.     

Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine,MK‐467, and their combination following intravenous administration in male cats

This study characterized the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine, MK‐467, and their combination following intravenous bolus administration to cats. Seven 6‐ to‐year‐old male neutered cats, weighting 5.1 ± 0.7 kg, were used in a randomized, crossover design. Dexmedetomidine [12.5 (D12.5) and 25 (D25) μg/kg], MK‐467 [300 μg/kg (M300)] or dexmedetomidine (25 μg/kg) and MK‐467 [75, 150, 300 or 600 μg/kg—only the plasma concentrations in the 600 μg/kg group (D25M600) were analyzed] were administered intravenously, and blood was collected until 8 hours thereafter. Plasma drug concentrations were analyzed using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. A two‐compartment model best fitted the data. Median (range) volume of the central compartment (mL/kg), volume of distribution at steady state (mL/kg), clearance (mL min/kg) and terminal half‐life (min) were 342 (131–660), 829 (496–1243), 14.6 (9.6–22.7) and 48 (40–69) for D12.5; 296 (179–982), 1111 (908–2175), 18.2 (12.4–22.9) and 52 (40–76) for D25; 653 (392–927), 1595 (1094–1887), 22.7 (18.5–36.4) and 48 (35–60) for dexmedetomidine in D25M600; 117 (112–163), 491 (379–604), 3.0 (2.0‐4.5) and 122 (99‐139) for M300; and 147 (112‐173), 462 (403‐714), 2.8 (2.1–4.8) and 118 (97–172) for MK‐467 in D25M600. MK‐467 moderately but statistically significantly affected the disposition of dexmedetomidine, whereas dexmedetomidine minimally affected the disposition of MK‐467.     

Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl,alfentanil, and sufentanil in isoflurane‐anesthetized cats

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in isoflurane‐anesthetized cats. Six adult cats were used. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. End‐tidal isoflurane concentration was set at 2% and adjusted as required due to spontaneous movement. Fentanyl (10 μg/kg), alfentanil (100 μg/kg), or sufentanil (1 μg/kg) was administered intravenously as a bolus, on separate days. Blood samples were collected immediately before and for 8 h following drug administration. Plasma drug concentration was determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Compartment models were fitted to concentration–time data. A 3‐compartment model best fitted the concentration–time data for all drugs, except for 1 cat in the sufentanil group (excluded from analysis). The volume of the central compartment and the volume of distribution at steady‐state (L/kg) [mean ± SEM (range)], the clearance (mL/min/kg) [harmonic mean ± pseudo‐SD (range)], and the terminal half‐life (min) [median (range)] were 0.25 ± 0.04 (0.09–0.34), 2.18 ± 0.16 (1.79–2.83), 18.6 ± 5.0 (15–29.8), and 151 (115–211) for fentanyl; 0.10 ± 0.01 (0.07–0.14), 0.89 ± 0.16 (0.68–1.83), 11.6 ± 2.6 (9.2–15.8), and 144 (118–501) for alfentanil; and 0.06 ± 0.01 (0.04–0.10), 0.77 ± 0.07 (0.63–0.99), 17.6 ± 4.3 (13.9–24.3), and 54 (46–76) for sufentanil. Differences in clearance and volume of distribution result in similar terminal half‐lives for fentanyl and alfentanil, longer than for sufentanil.     

Bioavailability of morphine,methadone, hydromorphone,and oxymorphone following buccal administration in cats

Buccal administration of buprenorphine is commonly used to treat pain in cats. It has been argued that absorption of buprenorphine through the buccal mucosa is high, in part due to its pKa of 8.24. Morphine, methadone, hydromorphone, and oxymorphone have a pKa between 8 and 9. This study characterized the bioavailability of these drugs following buccal administration to cats. Six healthy adult female spayed cats were used. Buccal pH was measured prior to drug administration. Morphine sulfate, 0.2 mg/kg IV or 0.5 mg/kg buccal; methadone hydrochloride, 0.3 mg/kg IV or 0.75 mg/kg buccal; hydromorphone hydrochloride, 0.1 mg/kg IV or 0.25 mg/kg buccal; or oxymorphone hydrochloride, 0.1 mg/kg IV or 0.25 mg/kg buccal were administered. All cats received all treatments. Arterial blood was sampled immediately prior to drug administration and at various times up to 8 h thereafter. Bioavailability was calculated as the ratio of the area under the time–concentration curve following buccal administration to that following IV administration, each indexed to the administered dose. Mean ± SE (range) bioavailability was 36.6 ± 5.2 (12.7–49.5), 44.2 ± 7.9 (18.7–70.5), 22.4 ± 6.9 (6.4–43.4), and 18.8 ± 2.0 (12.9–23.5)% for buccal administration of morphine, methadone, hydromorphone, and oxymorphone, respectively. Bioavailability of methadone was significantly higher than that of oxymorphone.     

Pharmacokinetics and bone tissue concentrations of lincomycin following intravenous and intramuscular administrations to cats

Albarellos, G. A., Montoya, L., Denamiel, G. A. A., Velo, M. C., Landoni, M. F. Pharmacokinetics and bone tissue concentrations of lincomycin following intravenous and intramuscular administrations to cats. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap.  35 , 534–540. The pharmacokinetic properties and bone concentrations of lincomycin in cats after single intravenous and intramuscular administrations at a dosage rate of 10 mg/kg were investigated. Lincomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for some gram‐positive strains isolated from clinical cases was determined. Serum lincomycin disposition was best‐fitted to a bicompartmental and a monocompartmental open models with first‐order elimination after intravenous and intramuscular dosing, respectively. After intravenous administration, distribution was rapid (T_1/2(d) = 0.22 ± 0.09 h) and wide as reflected by the volume of distribution (V_(d(ss))) of 1.24 ± 0.08 L/kg. Plasma clearance was 0.28 ± 0.09 L/h·kg and elimination half‐life (T_1/2) 3.56 ± 0.62 h. Peak serum concentration (C_max), T_max, and bioavailability for the intramuscular administration were 7.97 ± 2.31 μg/mL, 0.12 ± 0.05 h, and 82.55 ± 23.64%, respectively. Thirty to 45 min after intravenous administration, lincomycin bone concentrations were 9.31 ± 1.75 μg/mL. At the same time after intramuscular administration, bone concentrations were 3.53 ± 0.28 μg/mL. The corresponding bone/serum ratios were 0.77 ± 0.04 (intravenous) and 0.69 ± 0.18 (intramuscular). Lincomycin MIC for Staphylococcus spp. ranged from 0.25 to 16 μg/mL and for Streptococcus spp. from 0.25 to 8 μg/mL.     

Pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine following intravenous and buccal administration in cats,and effects on thermal threshold

This study reports the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine, following i.v. and buccal administration, and the relationship between buprenorphine concentration and its effect on thermal threshold. Buprenorphine (20 μg/kg) was administered intravenously or buccally to six cats. Thermal threshold was determined, and arterial blood sampled prior to, and at various times up to 24 h following drug administration. Plasma buprenorphine concentration was determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Compartment models were fitted to the time–concentration data. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models were fitted to the concentration‐thermal threshold data. Thermal threshold was significantly higher than baseline 44 min after buccal administration, and 7, 24, and 104 min after i.v. administration. A two‐ and three‐compartment model best fitted the data following buccal and i.v. administration, respectively. Following i.v. administration, mean ± SD volume of distribution at steady‐state (L/kg), clearance (mL·min/kg), and terminal half‐life (h) were 11.6 ± 8.5, 23.8 ± 3.5, and 9.8 ± 3.5. Following buccal administration, absorption half‐life was 23.7 ± 9.1 min, and terminal half‐life was 8.9 ± 4.9 h. An effect‐compartment model with a simple effect maximum model best predicted the time‐course of the effect of buprenorphine on thermal threshold. Median (range) k_e0 and EC50 were 0.003 (0.002–0.018)/min and 0.599 (0.073–1.628) ng/mL (i.v.), and 0.017 (0.002–0.023)/min and 0.429 (0.144–0.556) ng/mL (buccal).     

Pharmacokinetics of yohimbine following intravenous administration to horses

DiMaio Knych, H.K., Steffey, E.P., Deuel, J.L., Shepard, R.A., Stanley, S.D. Pharmacokinetics of yohimbine following intravenous administration to horses. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34 , 58–63. Yohimbine is an alpha 2 adrenergic receptor antagonist used most commonly in veterinary medicine to reverse the effects of the alpha 2 receptor agonists, xylazine and detomidine. Most notably, yohimbine has been shown to counteract the CNS depressant effects of alpha 2 receptor agonists in a number of species. The recent identification of a yohimbine positive urine sample collected from a horse racing in California has led to the investigation of the pharmacokinetics of this compound. Eight healthy adult horses received a single intravenous dose of 0.12 mg/kg yohimbine. Blood samples were collected at time 0 (prior to drug administration) and at various times up to 72 h post drug administration. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) and data analyzed using both noncompartmental and compartmental analysis. Peak plasma concentration was 114.5 + 31.8 ng/mL and occurred at 0.09 + 0.03 h. Mean ± SD systemic clearance (Cls) and steady‐state volume of distribution (Vdss) were 13.5 + 2.1 mL/min/kg and 3.3 + 1.3 L/kg following noncompartmental analysis. For compartmental analysis, plasma yohimbine vs. time data were best fitted to a two compartment model. Mean ± SD Cls and Vdss of yohimbine were 13.6 ± 2.0 mL/min/kg and 3.2 ± 1.1 L/kg, respectively. Mean ± SD terminal elimination half‐life was 4.4 ± 0.9 h following noncompartmental analysis. Immediately following administration, two horses showed signs of sedation, while the other six appeared behaviorally unaffected. Gastrointestinal sounds were moderately increased compared to baseline while fecal consistency appeared normal.     

Pharmacokinetics of tramadol, and its metabolite O-desmethyl-tramadol, in cats

Tramadol is an analgesic agent and is used in dogs and cats. Tramadol exerts its action through interactions with opioid, serotonin and adrenergic receptors. The opioid effect of tramadol is believed to be, at least in part, related to its metabolite, O-desmethyl-tramadol. The pharmacokinetics of tramadol and O-desmethyl-tramadol were examined after intravenous (i.v.) and oral administration of tramadol to six cats. A two-compartment model (with first-order absorption in the central compartment for the oral administration) with elimination from the central compartment best described the disposition of tramadol in cats. After i.v. administration, the apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment, the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state, the clearance, and the terminal half-life (mean +/- SEM) were 1553+/-118 mL/kg, 3103+/-132 mL/kg, 20.8+/-3.2 mL/min/kg, and 134+/-18 min, respectively. Systemic availability and terminal half-life after oral administration were 93+/-7% and 204+/-8 min, respectively. O-desmethyl-tramadol rapidly appeared in plasma following tramadol administration and had terminal half-lives of 261+/-28 and 289+/-19 min after i.v. and oral tramadol administration, respectively. The rate of formation of O-desmethyl-tramadol estimated from a model including both tramadol and O-desmethyl-tramadol was 0.014+/-0.003/min and 0.004+/-0.0008/min after i.v. and oral tramadol administration, respectively.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of cefquinome in healthy piglets

A study on bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of cefquinome in piglets was conducted after intravenous (i.v.) and intramuscular (i.m.) administrations of 2.0 mg/kg of body weight, respectively. Plasma concentrations were measured by high‐performance liquid chromatography assay with UV detector at 268‐nm wavelength. Plasma concentration–time data after i.v. administration were best fit by a two‐compartment model. The pharmacokinetic values were distribution half‐life 0.27 ± 0.21 h, elimination half‐life 1.85 ± 1.11 h, total body clearance 0.26 ± 0.08 L/kg·h, area under curve 8.07 ± 1.91 μg·h/mL and volume of distribution at steady state 0.46 ± 0.10 L/kg. Plasma concentration–time data after i.m. administration were also best fit by a two‐compartment model. The pharmacokinetic parameters were distribution half‐life 0.88 ± 0.42 h, elimination half‐life 4.36 ± 2.35 h, peak concentration 4.01 ± 0.57 μg/mL and bioavailability 95.13 ± 9.93%.     

The pharmacokinetics of glycopyrrolate in Standardbred horses

The disposition of plasma glycopyrrolate (GLY) is characterized by a three‐compartment pharmacokinetic model after a 1‐mg bolus intravenous dose to Standardbred horses. The median (range) plasma clearance (Clp), volume of distribution of the central compartment (V₁), volume of distribution at steady‐state (Vss), and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC_0‐inf) were 16.7 (13.6–21.7) mL/min/kg, 0.167 (0.103–0.215) L/kg, 3.69 (0.640–38.73) L/kg, and 2.58 (2.28–2.88) ng*h/mL, respectively. Renal clearance of GLY was characterized by a median (range) of 2.65 (1.92–3.59) mL/min/kg and represented approximately 11.3–24.7% of the total plasma clearance. As a result of these studies, we conclude that the majority of GLY is cleared through hepatic mechanisms because of the limited extent of renal clearance of GLY and absence of plasma esterase activity on GLY metabolism. Although the disposition of GLY after intravenous administration to Standardbred horses was similar to that in Thoroughbred horses, differences in some pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were evident. Such differences could be attributed to breed differences or study conditions. The research could provide valuable data to support regulatory guidelines for GLY in Standardbred horses.     

Pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid combination after intravenous and oral administration in goats

Summary

The intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics of an amoxicillin and clavulanic acid combination (20 mg/kg of sodium amoxicillin and 5 mg/kg of potassium clavulanate) were studied in six goats. After intravenous administration the pharmacokinetics of both drugs could be described by an open two‐compartment model. Amoxicillin had a greater distribution volume (0.19 ± 0.01 l/kg) than clavulanic acid (0.15 ± 0.01 l/kg), whereas the distribution and elimination constants were higher for the latter, which was eliminated more quickly than amoxicillin. After oral administration of both drugs their pharmacokinetic behaviour was best described by an open one‐compartment model with first‐order absorption. Elimination half‐lives were twice as long after oral (2.15 ± 0.20 h and 1.94 ± 0.16 h for amoxicillin and clavulanic acid respectively) than after intravenous administration (1.20 ± 0.16 h and 0.86 ± 0.09, respectively). An apparent ‘flip‐flop’ situation was evident in this study. Bioavailability was 27% for amoxicillin and 50% for clavulanic acid.     

Population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation of single and multiple dose administration of meloxicam in cats

Lehr, T., Narbe, R., Jöns, O., Kloft, C., Staab, A. Population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation of single and multiple dose administration of meloxicam in cats. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 33 , 277–286. The objectives of these investigations were: first, to describe the pharmacokinetic properties of meloxicam in cats following single and multiple oral administration and secondly, to simulate different oral dosage regimes for meloxicam in cats after multiple dose administration to illustrate and evaluate those dosage regimes for the alleviation of inflammation and pain in cats. Six healthy domestic short hair cats were treated orally with various dosage regimes (0.05–0.2 mg/kg/day). Plasma samples were collected at predefined times and quantitatively analysed using liquid/liquid extraction followed by reverse phase HPLC with UV‐detection. Meloxicam plasma concentration data were analysed using the population pharmacokinetic approach (software: NONMEM). The final model was used to simulate different dosage regimes. The plasma concentration–time profiles of meloxicam in cats after oral single and multiple dose administration were best described by an open one‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and first‐order elimination. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated to be 0.00656 L/h/kg for the total apparent body clearance (CL/F), 0.245 L/kg for the apparent volume of distribution (V/F), 1.26 1/h for the absorption constant (K_A) and 25.7 h for the mean plasma terminal half‐life. Simulations showed that the median trough steady‐state concentrations of 228 ng/mL were reached after five, one or 6 days following a single initial dose of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg each followed by 0.05 mg/kg/day.     

Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in adult goats and its analgesic effect in disbudded kids

Ingvast‐Larsson, C., Högberg, M., Mengistu, U., Olsén, L., Bondesson, U., Olsson, K. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in adult goats and its analgesic effect in disbudded kids. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34 , 64–69. The pharmacokinetics and analgesic effect of the nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug meloxicam (0.5 mg/kg) in goats were investigated. In a randomized, cross‐over design the pharmacokinetic parameters were investigated in adult goats (n = 8) after single intravenous and oral administration. The analgesic effect was evaluated in kids using a randomized, placebo controlled and blinded protocol. Kids received meloxicam (n = 6) once daily and their siblings (n = 5) got isotonic NaCl intramuscularly while still anaesthetized after cautery disbudding and injections were repeated on three consecutive days. In the adult goats after intravenous administration the terminal half‐life was 10.9 ± 1.7 h, steady‐state volume of distribution was 0.245 ± 0.06 L/kg, and total body clearance was 17.9 ± 4.3 mL/h/kg. After oral administration bioavailability was 79 ± 19%, C_max was 736 ± 184 ng/mL, T_max was 15 ±5 h, although the terminal half‐life was similar to the intravenous value, 11.8 ± 1.7 h. Signs of pain using a visual analogue scale were smaller in kids treated with meloxicam compared with kids treated with placebo on the first day after disbudding, but subsequently no difference in pain was noticeable. Plasma cortisol and glucose concentrations did not differ between the two groups.     

Characterization of the pharmacokinetic disposition of levofloxacin in stallions after intravenous and intramuscular administration

The target of the present study was to investigate the plasma disposition kinetics of levofloxacin in stallions (n = 6) following a single intravenous (i.v.) bolus or intramuscular (i.m.) injection at a dose rate of 4 mg/kg bwt, using a two‐phase crossover design with 15 days as an interval period. Plasma samples were collected at appropriate times during a 48‐h administration interval, and were analyzed using a microbiological assay method. The plasma levofloxacin disposition was best fitted to a two‐compartment open model after i.v. dosing. The half‐lives of distribution and elimination were 0.21 ± 0.13 and 2.58 ± 0.51 h, respectively. The volume of distribution at steady‐state was 0.81 ± 0.26 L/kg, the total body clearance (Cl_tot) was 0.21 ± 0.18 L/h/kg, and the areas under the concentration–time curves (AUCs) were 18.79 ± 4.57 μg.h/mL. Following i.m. administration, the mean t_1/2el and AUC values were 2.94 ± 0.78 h and 17.21 ± 4.36 μg.h/mL. The bioavailability was high (91.76% ± 12.68%), with a peak plasma mean concentration (C_max) of 2.85 ± 0.89 μg/mL attained at 1.56 ± 0.71 h (T_max). The in vitro protein binding percentage was 27.84%. Calculation of efficacy predictors showed that levofloxacin might have a good therapeutic profile against Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria, with an MIC ≤ 0.1 μg/mL.     

Pharmacokinetics of single doses of maropitant citrate in adult horses

The neurokinin‐1 (NK) receptor antagonist, maropitant citrate, mitigates nausea and vomiting in dogs and cats. Nausea is poorly understood and likely under‐recognized in horses. Use of NK‐1 receptor antagonists in horses has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of maropitant in seven adult horses after single intravenous (IV; 1 mg/kg) and intragastric (IG; 2 mg/kg) doses. A randomized, crossover design was performed. Serial blood samples were collected after dosing; maropitant concentrations were measured using LC‐MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The mean plasma maropitant concentration 3 min after IV administration was 800 ± 140 ng/ml, elimination half‐life was 10.37 ± 2.07 h, and volume of distribution was 6.54 ± 1.84 L/kg. The maximum concentration following IG administration was 80 ± 40 ng/ml, and elimination half‐life was 9.64 ± 1.27 hr. Oral bioavailability was variable at 13.3 ± 5.3%. Maropitant concentrations achieved after IG administration were comparable to those in small animals. Concentrations after IV administration were lower than in dogs and cats. Elimination half‐life was longer than in dogs and shorter than in cats. This study is the basis for further investigations into using maropitant in horses.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of valnemulin in broiler chickens

Wang, R., Yuan, L.G., He, L.M., Zhu, L.X., Luo, X.Y., Zhang, C.Y., Yu, J.J., Fang, B.H., Liu, Y.H. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of valnemulin in broiler chickens. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34 , 247–251. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of valnemulin in broiler chickens after intravenous (i.v.), intramuscular (i.m.) and oral administrations of 10 mg/kg body weight (bw). Plasma samples were analyzed by high‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC‐MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic characterization was performed by non‐compartmental analysis using WinNonlin program. After intravenous administration, distribution was wide with the volume of distribution based on terminal phase(V_z) of 4.27 ± 0.99 L /kg. Mean valnemulin t_1/2β(h), Cl_β(L /h /kg), V_ss (L /kg) and AUC_(0–∞)(μg·h /mL) values were 2.85, 0.99, 2.72 and 10.34, respectively. After intramuscular administration, valnemulin was rapidly absorbed with a C_max of 2.2 μg/mL achieved at 0.43 h (t_max), and the absolute bioavailability (F) was 88.81%; and for the oral route the same parameters were 0.66 ± 0.15 μg/mL, 1.54 ± 0.27 h and 74.42%. A multiple‐peak phenomenon was present after oral administration. The plasma profile of valnemulin exhibited a secondary peak during 2–6 h and a tertiary peak at 32 h. The favorable PK behavior, such as the wide distribution, slow elimination and acceptable bioavailability indicated that it is likely to be effective in chickens.     

Oral,subcutaneous, and intravenous pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in healthy cats

Ondansetron is a 5‐HT₃ receptor antagonist that is an effective anti‐emetic in cats. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in healthy cats. Six cats with normal complete blood count, serum biochemistry, and urinalysis received 2 mg oral (mean 0.43 mg/kg), subcutaneous (mean 0.4 mg/kg), and intravenous (mean 0.4 mg/kg) ondansetron in a cross‐over manner with a 5‐day wash out. Serum was collected prior to, and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h after administration of ondansetron. Ondansetron concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic modeling and dose interval modeling were performed. Repeated measures anova was used to compare parameters between administration routes. Bioavailability of ondansetron was 32% (oral) and 75% (subcutaneous). Calculated elimination half‐life of ondansetron was 1.84 ± 0.58 h (intravenous), 1.18 ± 0.27 h (oral) and 3.17 ± 0.53 h (subcutaneous). The calculated elimination half‐life of subcutaneous ondansetron was significantly longer (P < 0.05) than oral or intravenous administration. Subcutaneous administration of ondansetron to healthy cats is more bioavailable and results in a more prolonged exposure than oral administration. This information will aid management of emesis in feline patients.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of butorphanol following intravenous administration to the horse

Knych, H. K., Casbeer, H. C., McKemie, D. S., Arthur, R. M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of butorphanol following intravenous administration to the horse. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap.  36 , 21–30. Butorphanol is a narcotic analgesic commonly used in horses. Currently, any detectable concentration of butorphanol in biological samples collected from performance horses is considered a violation. The primary goal of the study reported here was to update the pharmacokinetics of butorphanol following intravenous administration, utilizing a highly sensitive liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) assay that is currently employed in many drug‐testing laboratories. An additional objective was to characterize behavioral and cardiac effects following administration of butorphanol. Ten exercised adult horses received a single intravenous dose of 0.1 mg/kg butorphanol. Blood and urine samples were collected at time 0 and at various times for up to 120 h and analyzed using LC‐MS. Mean ± SD systemic clearance, steady‐state volume of distribution, and terminal elimination half‐life were 11.5 ± 2.5 mL/min/kg, 1.4 ± 0.3 L/kg, and 5.9 ± 1.5 h, respectively. Butorphanol plasma concentrations were below the limit of detection (LOD) (0.01 ng/mL) by 48 h post administration. Urine butorphanol concentrations were below the LOD (0.05 ng/mL) of the assay in seven of 10 horses by 120 h post drug administration. Following administration, horses appeared excited as noted by an increase in heart rate and locomotion. Gastrointestinal sounds were markedly decreased for up to 24 h.     

Bayesian population pharmacokinetic modeling of florfenicol in pigs after intravenous and intramuscular administration

Bayesian population pharmacokinetic models of florfenicol in healthy pigs were developed based on retrospective data in pigs either via intravenous (i.v.) or intramuscular (i.m.) administration. Following i.v. administration, the disposition of florfenicol was best described by a two‐compartment open model with the typical values of half‐life at α phase (t _1/2α), half‐life at β phase (t _1/2β), total body clearance (Cl), and volume of distribution (V _d) were 0.132 ± 0.0289, 2.78 ± 0.166 hr, 0.215 ± 0.0102, and 0.841 ± 0.0289 L kg^?1, respectively. The disposition of florfenicol after i.m. administration was best described by a one‐compartment open model. The typical values of maximum concentration of drug in serum (C _max), elimination half‐life (t _1/2Kel), Cl, and Volume (V ) were 5.52 ± 0.605 μg/ml, 9.96 ± 1.12 hr, 0.228 ± 0.0154 L hr^?1 kg^?1, and 3.28 ± 0.402 L/kg, respectively. The between‐subject variabilities of all the parameters after i.m. administration were between 25.1%–92.1%. Florfenicol was well absorbed (94.1%) after i.m. administration. According to Monte Carlo simulation, 8.5 and 6 mg/kg were adequate to exert 90% bactericidal effect against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae after i.v. and i.m. administration.     

Pharmacokinetics of ceftiofur crystalline free acid after single subcutaneous administration in lactating and nonlactating domestic goats (Capra aegagrus hircus)

Doré, E., Angelos, J. A., Rowe, J. D., Carlson, J. L., Wetzlich, S. E., Kieu, H. T., Tell, L. A. Pharmacokinetics of ceftiofur crystalline free acid after single subcutaneous administration in lactating and nonlactating domestic goats (Capra aegagrus hircus). J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34 , 25–30. Six nonlactating and six lactating adult female goats received a single subcutaneous injection of ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA) at a dosage of 6.6 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein before and at multiple time points after CCFA administration. Milk samples were collected twice daily. Concentrations of ceftiofur and desfuroylceftiofur‐related metabolites were measured using high‐performance liquid chromatography. Data were analyzed using compartmental and noncompartmental approaches. The pharmacokinetics of CCFA in the domestic goat was best described by a one compartment model. Mean (±SD) pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows for the nonlactating goats: area under the concentration time curve_0–∞ (159 h·μg/mL ± 19), maximum observed serum concentration (2.3 μg/mL ± 1.1), time of maximal observed serum concentration (26.7 h ± 16.5) and terminal elimination half life (36.9 h; harmonic). For the lactating goats, the pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: area under the concentration time curve_0–∞ (156 h·μg/mL ± 14), maximum observed serum concentration (1.5 μg/mL ± 0.4), time of maximal observed serum concentration (46 h ± 15.9) and terminal elimination half life (37.3 h; harmonic). Ceftiofur and desfuroylceftiofur‐related metabolites were only detectable in one milk sample at 36 h following treatment. There were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameter between the nonlactating and lactating goats.