Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced luteinizing hormone release in heifers: effect of nutrition during gestation

The effects of nutrition during the last two trimesters of gestation on GnRH-induced LH release were assessed in crossbred heifers. Heifers (n = 58) were allotted at 90 d gestation to one of three levels of an experimental diet fed at 1, 1.5 or 2% of BW to attain maternal BW loss, BW maintenance or BW gain, respectively, at parturition. Twenty-two heifers were injected (i.m.) once with 100 micrograms GnRH between d 14 and 1 before parturition, and 32 heifers were injected (i.m.) once with 100 micrograms GnRH between d 8 and 21 after parturition. Jugular blood samples were collected before and at 30-min intervals after GnRH for 4 h. Least squares means for BW change differed (P less than .01) among BW loss (-17.6%), BW maintenance (-6.0%) and BW gain (7.0%) heifers. Basal plasma LH concentration was not influenced by nutritional treatment and was similar before and after parturition for all groups. However, in response to GnRH, peak plasma LH concentration was greater (P less than .10) for prepartum than for postpartum heifers. Mean LH peak amplitude in prepartum heifers was approximately twofold greater (P less than .10) in the BW loss and maintenance groups compared with the BW gain group. Prepartum LH release was related inversely (r = -.64) to change in heifer BW and increased (P less than .01) as BW loss increased during gestation. After parturition, mean LH peak amplitude and area under the response curve averaged 50% less (P less than .10) in the BW loss and maintenance groups than in the BW gain group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Endocrine responses and ovarian changes in inseminated dairy heifers after an injection of a GnRH agonist 11 to 13 days after estrus.

Our objective in this study was to determine endocrine responses and changes in ovarian structures after a single injection of a GnRH agonist in Holstein dairy heifers (n = 38). Heifers were inseminated and received (i.m.) either saline or 200 micrograms of fertirelin acetate once on d 11, 12, or 13 after estrus (d 0). Blood was collected at 15- to 30-min intervals for 6 h after the injection to determine concentrations of LH, FSH, estradiol (E), and progesterone (P) in serum and once daily for 8 to 12 d after the injection to determine concentrations of E and P. Pregnancy rates were 58% (11 of 19) in both treatment groups. Diameter of the corpus luteum and numbers and appearance of ovarian follicles were determined by real-time ultrasonography on d-1 through 5 after injection. No treatment-induced ovulations or changes in the number of ovarian follicles were observed after the injection of the GnRH agonist. More (P less than .05) of the largest follicles within heifers receiving fertirelin acetate showed changes in their appearance on at least the 1st d after injection (6 of 10 vs 1 of 9 control heifers). Fertirelin acetate induced release of LH and FSH from the pituitary within 15 min of injection; both hormones reached peak concentrations at 120 min and then returned to pretreatment concentrations by 300 to 360 min after injection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effects of 3 gonadorelin products on luteinizing hormone release,ovulation, and follicular wave emergence in cattle

The objective was to determine luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and follicular dynamics in cattle following administration of 3 gonadorelin formulations that are commercially available in Canada. In experiment 1, nonlactating Holstein cows (n = 4 per group) were randomly assigned to receive 100 micrograms gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate, intramuscularly (C; Cystorelin, or FE; Fertagyl). Blood samples (for LH analysis) were collected 0, 1, 2, and 4 hours after treatment. In experiment 2, nonlactating Holstein cows (n = 10 per group) were randomly allocated to receive 100 micrograms gonadorelin, intramuscularly as follows: 2 mL of C; 1 mL of FE; or 2 mL of Factrel (FA, gonadorelin hydrochloride). Gonadorelin treatment was done on days 6 or 7 after ovulation and blood samples for LH analysis were collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after treatment. Ovaries were examined by ultrasonography, twice daily, to detect ovulation. A replicate was conducted using only C (n = 10) or FE (n = 10); blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. In experiment 3, beef heifers (n = 10 per group) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 GnRH gonadorelin treatments (as in the first phase of experiment 2) on days 6 or 7 after ovulation and blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 4 hours. In experiments 2 and 3, both mean and mean peak plasma LH concentrations were higher (P < 0.05) in cattle treated with C. The proportion of dominant follicles that ovulated was higher (P < 0.02) in Holstein cows treated with C than in those treated with FE or FA (18/19, 11/19, and 4/7, respectively), but there was no significant difference among the products in beef heifers (6/10, 6/10, and 4/10, respectively). No significant differences were found in the interval from treatment to the emergence of the next follicular wave. In summary, C induced a greater LH release and this resulted in a higher ovulatory rate in Holstein cows but not in beef heifers.     

Plasma luteinizing hormone response to increasing doses of synthetic gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in heifers

The dosenresponse relationship for a synthetic gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was studied in normally cycling heifers using the area under the luteinizing hormone (LH) curve as a response parameter. Oestrus was synchronized by an injection of 0.5 mg cloprostenol before the experiment started and after the 3rd treatment with GnRH. Treatment with GnRH as assigned in a Latin square included 5 dose levels (0, 10, 50, 100, 250 μg) and 5 treatment days over a period of 22 days. GnRH was capable of inducing an increase of plasma LH within 30 min after injection. Plasma LH response increased with increasing doses of GnRH, the largest increase being observed when the dose was raised from 50 μg to 100 μg. One heifer did not respond to any of the doses applied. The existence of an individual treshold dose of GnRH is suggested.     

Follicle dynamics and characteristics of ovulation in heifers after Ovsynch treatment in the last third of the estrous cycle

The objective of the experiment was to study follicular dynamics and characteristics of ovulations in dairy heifers after application of the Ovsynch protocol in the last third of estrous cycle. Therefore, altogether 27 regular cycling Holstein heifers were given an injection of GnRH on day 14, 16 or 18 (9 heifers each in group 1 to 3) of the estrous cycle. All heifers were administered PGF2alpha seven days later. Blood was collected for progesterone determination, just before, 24 hours and 48 hours after the PGF2alpha injection. A second injection of GnRH was administered 48 hours after the PGF2alpha injection. Ovarian follicular dynamics were monitored by frequent ultrasound scanning of the ovaries after first and second GnRH injection. Altogether 22 of 27 heifers (81.5%) ovulated 27 to 33 h after first GnRH injection. In 4 heifers ovulations were recorded 45 to 51 h after first GnRH application. Mean intervals between GnRH application and ovulation were 33.0, 33.6 and 28.3 h, respectively. At the time of PGF2alpha injection mean progesterone concentrations were similar in groups 1 and 2, but significantly lower than in group 3. After the second GnRH treatment 5,6 and 8 heifers had ovulations.The average intervals from the second GnRH treatment to ovulation were 24.8, 24.0 and 24.4 h respectively.The results show that Ovsynch is not sufficient to ensure synchronisation of oestrous and ovulation in each animal treated.     

Progesterone concentration,estradiol pretreatment,and dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone affect gonadotropin-releasing hormone-mediated luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers

We examined whether progesterone (P₄)-induced suppression of LH release in cattle can be overcome by an increased dose of exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or pretreatment with estradiol (E₂). In Experiment 1, postpubertal Angus-cross heifers (N = 32) had their 2 largest ovarian follicles ablated 5 d after ovulation. Concurrently, these heifers were all given a once-used, intravaginal P₄-releasing insert (CIDR), and they were randomly assigned to be given either prostaglandin F_2α (Low-P₄) or no treatment (High-P₄) at follicle ablation, and 12 h later. Six days after emergence of a new follicular wave, half of the heifers in each group (n = 8) were given either 100 or 200 μg of GnRH i.m. Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were higher in the Low- vs High-P₄ groups, and in heifers given 200 vs 100 μg of GnRH (mean ± SEM 15.4 ± 2.2 vs 9.1 ± 1.2, and 14.8 ± 2.1 vs 9.8 ± 1.4 ng/mL, respectively; P ≤ 0.01). Ovulation rate was higher (P = 0.002) in the Low-P₄ group (15/16) than in the High-P₄ group (6/16), but it was not affected by GnRH dose (P = 0.4). In Experiment 2, heifers (n = 22) were treated similarly, except that 5.5 d after wave emergence, half of the heifers in each group were further allocated to be given either 0.25 mg estradiol benzoate i.m. or no treatment, and 8 h later, all heifers were given 100 μg GnRH i.m. Both groups treated with E₂ (Low- and High-P₄) and the Low-P₄ group without E₂ had higher peak plasma LH concentrations compared to the group with high P₄ without E₂ (12.6 ± 1.8, 10.4 ± 1.8, 8.7 ± 1.3, and 3.9 ± 1.2 ng/mL, respectively; (P < 0.04)). However, E₂ pretreatment did not increase ovulation rates in response to GnRH (P = 0.6). In summary, the hypotheses that higher doses of GnRH will be more efficacious in inducing LH release and that exogenous E₂ will increase LH release following treatment with GnRH were supported, but neither significantly increased ovulation rate.     

Distribution and repeatability of anterior pituitary responses to GnRH and relationship of response classification to the postpartum anovulatory interval of beef cows

Our objectives were to investigate the phenotypic variation in anterior pituitary responsiveness to GnRH (100 microg, i.v.) of beef cows between d 5 and 8 postpartum, estimate repeatability, and determine the relationship between response classification and duration of the postpartum anovulatory interval (PPI). Brahman x Hereford (F1) cows (n = 137) and primiparous heifers (n = 58) were evaluated. Response classifications (Class) included peak LH (Low, Intermediate, or High; Class I) and time to peak LH (Early, 10 to 30 min or Late, 60 to 120 min; Class II). The independent effects of Class I and II on PPI were determined in 145 of 195 cows through twice-weekly serum samples analyzed for progesterone. For Class I, pituitary responses to GnRH approximated a normal distribution and, by definition, differed (P < .001) in magnitudes of peak LH and area under the curve (AUC). For Class II, 111 and 84 cows exhibited early and late peaks, respectively; mean AUC was greater (P < .05) in cows exhibiting late compared with early peaks. Pretreatment LH (P < .01) and estradiol-17beta (P < .004) influenced responses in one or both response classes. Pluriparous cows had shorter (P < .035) PPI than primiparous cows. Class I did not influence the duration of the PPI; however, in Class II, cows with late peaks exhibited an average PPI that was 8 d shorter (P < .025) than in those with an early peak. To estimate repeatability of pituitary responses, 18 classified cows were subsequently rechallenged with GnRH at d 170 of gestation and at the next postpartum period. Although means for each of these challenges differed (P < .05) throughout in both Classes I and II, the small sample size used to make the estimate failed to yield significant (P > .10) interclass correlations. Nevertheless, overall results provide evidence that variability in individual pituitary responses to GnRH could be targeted as a selection marker to improve reproduction.     

Effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist and altrenogest on luteinizing hormone concentration and ovulation in the mare

The objective of Experiment 1 was to determine a dose and frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration to effectively suppress serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentration and to delay ovulation when administered to mares. The objectives of Experiment 2 were 1) to determine the effects of subcutaneous or intravenous administration of a GnRH antagonist or oral altrenogest on serum LH concentration in the estrual mare; and 2) to determine the effectiveness of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in inducing ovulation in mares with suppressed LH concentrations. In Experiment 1, mares (N = 20) were randomly assigned and treated with either 5% mannitol (control, single subcutaneous injection, 1 mL, at time 0; n = 5); low-dose GnRH antagonist (single subcutaneous injection, 0.01 mg/kg, at time 0; n = 5); frequent low-dose GnRH antagonist (subcutaneous injections, 0.01 mg/kg, at 0, 6, 18, and 24 hours; n = 5); or high-dose GnRH antagonist (single subcutaneous injection, 0.04 mg/kg, at time 0; n = 5). Both the frequent low-dose and high-dose GnRH antagonist treatments resulted in significantly lower LH concentrations compared with controls at 90, 102, and 114 hours after treatment (P < .05). In Experiment 2, mares (N = 38) were randomly assigned and treated with subcutaneous sterile saline (control), altrenogest (oral), subcutaneous GnRH antagonist, or intravenous GnRH antagonist. LH concentration for the altrenogest group was lower than the control group at 3, 4, 18, and 30 hours after treatment (P < .05). LH concentration for both the subcutaneous and intravenous GnRH antagonist groups were lower compared with the control group at several time points (P < .05). Based on these data, dose but not frequency of administration of a GnRH antagonist lowered LH concentration in the estrous mare but did not delay ovulation. In addition, serum LH concentrations can be lowered and ovulation effectively postponed in mares treated with altrenogest followed by administration of hCG. This indicates that serum LH concentrations can be lowered and ovulation effectively postponed in mares treated with altrenogest followed by administration of hCG.     

Lack of LH response to exogenous estradiol in heifers with ACTH-induced ovarian follicular cysts.

The aim of the present study was to examine the LH response to exogenous estradiol in 4 heifers with ACTH-induced ovarian follicular cysts. During the control experiment, administration of estradiol 24 hr after PGF2alpha in luteal phase heifers resulted in a LH response in all 4 heifers. The LH response was obtained between 16-20 hr after estradiol administration. The peak LH concentration (Mean +/- SEM; 5.1 +/- 0.8 ng/ml) during the control study was significantly different (P<0.05) from the concentration after cyst formation. None of the 4 heifers responded to estradiol after ovarian cyst formation. This result suggests that heifers with ACTH-induced ovarian follicular cysts may have a defective hypothalamio-pituitary response to exogenous estradiol similar to cows with spontaneous ovarian cysts.     

Effect of GnRH Dose on Occurrence of Short Oestrous Cycles and LH Response in Cyclic Dairy Heifers

Prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) and GnRH treatments given 24 h apart have been shown to result in short oestrous cycles (8–12 days) in some cows and heifers. The differences in responses may depend on the dose of GnRH. Therefore, the effect of the dose of GnRH on occurrence of short cycles and LH response was studied here. Oestrus was induced with dexcloprostenol (0.15 mg) in two groups of Ayrshire heifers. A second luteolysis was induced similarly on day 7 after ovulation; 24 h after PGF_2α treatment, the heifers were administered either a high (0.5 mg, n = 15, group T500) or low (0.1 mg, n = 10, group T100) dose of gonadorelin. Blood samples for progesterone analyses were collected daily from the second PGF_2α administration to the second ovulation after the PGF_2α injection. Beginning 24 h after the GnRH treatment, ovaries were examined by transrectal ultrasonography every 6 h until ovulation, and daily between day 4 and the next ovulation. Five heifers from both groups were sampled for LH analyses via a jugular catheter every 30 min from 1 h before to 6 h after the GnRH administration. Short oestrous cycles were detected in 7 of 10 cases in group T100 and in 12 of 15 cases in group T500. No significant differences in LH responses were detected between the groups. In group T500, the rise in LH concentration tended to be somewhat slower than in group T100. The dose of GnRH (0.1 vs 0.5 mg) did not affect the occurrence of short oestrous cycles and LH response.     

Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone for hastening ovulation in transitional mares

Natural GnRH and its analog have potential for hastening ovulation in mares. A study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a GnRH agonist given either as an injectable or s.c. implant for induction of ovulation in mares. Forty-five seasonally anestrous mares (March) were assigned to one of three groups (n = 15/group): 1) untreated controls; 2) i.m. injection of the GnRH agonist buserelin at 12-h intervals (40 micrograms/injection for 28 d or until ovulation) and 3) GnRH agonist administered as a s.c. implant (approximately 100 micrograms/24 h for 28 d). Six mares per group were bled on d 0, 7, 14 and 21 after injection or insertion of implant. Samples were taken at -1, -.5 and 0 h and at .5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after GnRH. Additional daily samples were drawn for 28 d after injection or until ovulation. Samples were assayed for concentration of LH and FSH. Progesterone concentrations were determined in samples collected on d 4, 6 and 10 after ovulation. Number and size of follicles and detection of ovulation were determined by ultrasonography. Number of mares induced to ovulate within 30 d was 0 of 15, 7 of 15 and 9 of 15 for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. During treatment, follicle sizes were smaller for mares in group 3 (implant). The LH response to GnRH agonist (area under curve) was similar among groups at d 0 but was greater (P less than .05) for mares in group 3 on d 7 and 14 and groups 2 and 3 on d 21 than for controls. A similar pattern was detected for peak concentrations of LH after GnRH on d 0, 7, 14 and 21. Daily concentrations of LH remained low in untreated control mares compared with GnRH-treated mares throughout the sampling period. Concentrations of LH for mares in group 3 that ovulated were elevated greatly above those for group 2 mares, whereas concentrations of FSH were similar in both treatment groups prior to ovulation.     

Changes in luteinizing hormone secretion after estradiol treatment in prepubertal Nelore heifers

Changes in luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion after 17β-estradiol (E(2)) injection were evaluated during sexual maturation in 10 prepubertal Nelore heifers. Heifers were divided into 2 groups: intact (I) and ovariectomized (OVX). 17β-estradiol (2 μg/kg) was administered to both groups at 10, 13, and 17 mo of age. Only at 10 mo of age was there a greater mean LH concentration in OVX heifers (1.33 ± 0.29 ng/mL) compared with the I group (0.57 ± 0.15 ng/mL). At 13 and 17 mo of age there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in any of the evaluated variables (number of peaks, total peak area, greatest peak area, and time to greatest peak occurrence). This suggests a decrease in negative E(2) feedback associated with an increase in positive feedback to LH secretion during sexual maturation, and these were likely the key factors that determined the time of first ovulation in Nelore heifers.     

Induced gonadotropin release in adrenocorticotropin-treated bulls and steers

The effect of adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) on plasma cortisol and on gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced release of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone was determined in nine Holstein bulls and 12 Holstein steers. Treatments consisted of animals receiving either GnRH (200 micrograms, Group G), ACTH (.45 IU/kg BW, Group A) or a combination of ACTH followed 2 h later by GnRH (Group AG). Group G steers and bulls had elevated plasma LH and FSH within .5 h after GnRH injection and plasma testosterone was increased by 1 h after GnRH injection in bulls. In Group A, plasma cortisol was elevated by .5 h after ACTH injection in both steers and bulls, but plasma LH and FSH were unaffected. In Group A bulls, testosterone was reduced after ACTH injection. In Group AG, ACTH caused an immediate increase in plasma cortisol in both steers and bulls, but did not affect the increase in either plasma LH or FSH in response to GnRH in steers. In Group AG bulls, ACTH did not prevent an increase in either plasma LH, FSH or testosterone in response to GnRH compared with basal concentrations. However, magnitude of systemic FSH response was reduced compared with response in Group G bulls, but plasma LH and testosterone were not reduced. The results indicate that ACTH caused an increase in plasma cortisol, but did not adversely affect LH or FSH response to GnRH in steers and bulls. Further, while testosterone was decreased after ACTH alone, neither ACTH nor resulting increased plasma cortisol resulted in decreased testosterone production in the bull after GnRH stimulation.     

褪黑素对荷斯坦奶牛妊娠率及生殖激素的影响

试验旨在探明皮下注射褪黑素（MT）对荷斯坦奶牛配种妊娠率及血清生殖激素的影响。用计步器法确定自然发情的首次配种荷斯坦奶牛150头，对其中70头进行颈部皮下肌内注射褪黑素30 mg，12 h后进行人工输精；选择170头产后首次配种的荷斯坦奶牛进行同期排卵-定时输精处理，其中90头荷斯坦奶牛最后一次注射促性腺激素释放激素（gonadotropin-releasing hormone，GnRH）的同时进行颈部皮下肌内注射褪黑素30 mg，16 h后进行人工输精。在进行二次配种的荷斯坦奶牛中选择153只进行皮下注射褪黑素。荷斯坦奶牛输精后20~35 d进行妊娠检查，详细记录首次配种妊娠母牛头数、二次配种妊娠母牛头数、产犊数。选取同期排卵-定时输精的荷斯坦奶牛25头，皮下注射褪黑素8 h后用放射免疫法检测其血清中褪黑素、促卵泡素（FSH）、促黄体素（LH）、雌二醇（E₂）的含量及35 d妊检时妊娠母牛血清中孕酮（P₄）含量。结果显示，与自然发情和同期排卵对照组相比，其对应的皮下注射褪黑素组荷斯坦奶牛的妊娠率及产犊率均显著提高（P<0.05）；皮下注射褪黑素组的双犊率显著提高（P<0.05），首次配种妊娠率和产犊率均显著提高（P<0.05），二次配种妊娠率和产犊率均差异不显著（P>0.05）。血清激素检测结果表明，与对照组相比，皮下注射褪黑素组血清中褪黑素、LH、E₂含量均显著增加（P<0.05）；35 d妊检时，皮下注射褪黑素的妊娠母牛P₄含量显著增加（P<0.05）。本试验结果表明，皮下注射褪黑素能够提高荷斯坦奶牛的妊娠率、产犊率及血清中LH、E₂和P₄含量，说明皮下注射褪黑素能够促进卵母细胞成熟和排卵，并提高配种妊娠率。     

Changes in serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone following injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone during pregnancy and after parturition in mares

High concentrations of estrogens in the peripheral circulation during late gestation inhibit synthesis of LH and markedly reduce pituitary content of LH at the end of pregnancy in most domestic species. Because blood concentrations of estrogen peak shortly before mid-gestation in the mare and then gradually decrease until parturition, we hypothesized that pituitary content of LH may increase during late gestation. To test this hypothesis 10 horse mares were challenged with a maximally stimulatory dose (2 micrograms/kg) of GnRH on d 240 and 320 of gestation and d 3 after parturition. A separate group of four mares were treated with GnRH on d 2 or 3 estrus. Blood samples were collected at -2, -1, 0, .25, .5, .75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 h relative to injection of GnRH and serum was analyzed for concentration of LH and FSH. Basal serum concentration and total quantity of LH released after GnRH stimulation (assessed by determining the area under the response curve) were not different on d 240 and 320 of gestation or on d 3 after parturition (12.5 +/- 3.5, 5.7 +/- 1.5 and 29.1 +/- 12.1 ng.min/ml, respectively) and were less (P less than .05) than on d 3 of estrus (311.0 +/- 54.0 ng.min/ml). There was little difference in the basal serum concentration of FSH at any of the time points examined. In contrast, GnRH-induced release of FSH continually decreased (P less than .05) from d 240 of gestation (559.8 +/- 88.9 ng.min/ml) to d 3 of estrus (51.8 +/- 6.2 ng.min/ml).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Influence of inducing luteal regression before a modified controlled internal drug-releasing device treatment on control of follicular development

At the initiation of most controlled internal drug-releasing (CIDR) device protocols, GnRH has been used to induce ovulation and reset follicular waves; however, its ability to initiate a new follicular wave is variable and dependent on stage of the estrous cycle. The objectives of the current studies were to determine 1) if inducing luteal regression before the injection of GnRH at time of insertion of a CIDR resulted in increased control of follicular development, and 2) if removing endogenous progesterone by inducing luteal regression before insertion of the CIDR decreased variation in LH pulse frequency. In Exp. 1 and 2, Angus-cross cycling beef heifers (n = 22 and 38, respectively) were allotted to 1 of 2 treatments: 1) heifers received an injection of PGF(2α) on d -3, an injection of GnRH and insertion of a CIDR on d 0, and a PGF(2α) injection and CIDR removal on d 6 (PG-CIDR) or 2) an injection of GnRH and insertion of a CIDR on d 0 and on d 7 an injection of PGF(2α) and removal of CIDR (Select Synch + CIDR). In Exp. 3, Angus-cross beef heifers (n = 15) were assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: 1) PG-CIDR; 2) PGF(2α) on d -3, GnRH on d 0, and PGF(2α) on d 6 (PG-No CIDR); or 3) Select Synch + CIDR. Follicular development and ovulatory response were determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Across all experiments, more (P = 0.02) heifers treated with PG before GnRH initiated a new follicular wave after the injection of GnRH compared with Select Synch + CIDR-treated heifers. In Exp. 1, after CIDR removal, interval to estrus did not differ (P = 0.18) between treatments; however, the variance for the interval to estrus was reduced (P < 0.01) in PG-CIDR heifers compared with Select Synch + CIDR heifers. In Exp. 3, there was a tendency (P = 0.09) for LH pulse frequency to be greater among PG-CIDR and PG-No CIDR compared with the Select Synch + CIDR, but area under the curve, mean LH concentrations, and mean amplitude did not differ (P > 0.76). In summary, induction of luteal regression before an injection of GnRH increased the percentage of heifers initiating a new follicular wave. Removal of endogenous progesterone tended to increase LH pulse frequency, and the modified treatment increased the synchrony of estrus after CIDR removal.     

Kisspeptin‐10 stimulates the release of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in pre‐ and post‐pubertal male goats

The aims of the present study were to clarify the effect of kisspeptin‐10 (Kp10) on the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) in pre‐pubertal and post‐pubertal male ruminants. Four male goats (Shiba goats) were given an intravenous (i.v.) injection of Kp10 (5 µg/kg body weight (b.w.)), gonadotoropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH, 1 µg/kg b.w.), or 2 mL of saline as a control at the ages of 3 (pre‐pubertal) and 6 (post‐pubertal) months. A single i.v. injection of Kp10 significantly stimulated the release of LH and T in both groups. The area under the response curve (AUC) of LH for a 60‐min period after the i.v. injection of Kp10 was significantly greater in the pre‐pubertal goats (P < 0.05). The AUC of T for a 120 min period post‐injection did not differ between the two age groups. A single i.v. injection of GnRH also significantly stimulated the release of LH and T in both groups (P < 0.05). The secretory pattern of LH and T in response to GnRH resembled that in response to Kp10. These results show that the LH‐releasing response to Kp10 is greater in pre‐pubertal than post‐pubertal male goats. They also show that Kp10, as well as GnRH, is able to stimulate the release of T in male goats.     

Effect of luteinizing hormone oscillations on progesterone concentrations based on treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in heifers

Close temporality has been reported between the episodic secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (P4) during the midluteal phase and preceding the beginning of luteolysis in cattle. In the present studies, the relationship between LH and P4 was examined by blocking LH oscillations with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, acyline. In a titration study, the minimal single acyline dose for blocking LH oscillations in heifers was 3 μg/kg. The main experiment compared LH and P4 concentrations and oscillations between a group treated with acyline on day 15 after ovulation (n = 8) and a control group (n = 4). Concentrations of P4 in blood samples collected every 8 h on days 13 to 18 indicated that acyline treatment did not alter the time that luteolysis began or the length of the luteolytic process. In blood samples collected every hour for 24 h beginning at the hour of treatment, acyline reduced the LH concentrations and blocked LH oscillations. The hourly LH means were 0.06 to 0.08 ng/mL, comparable to the mean concentration at the nadirs of LH oscillations in controls (0.07 ng/mL). During the hourly sampling, the GnRH antagonist produced the following P4 responses: (1) lower P4 concentrations, (2) fewer and reduced prominence of P4 oscillations, and (3) increased length and variability in the interval between the peaks of P4 oscillations. Results indicated that LH oscillations affect both the prominence and the rhythmicity of P4 oscillations during preluteolysis but not the onset and length of luteolysis.     

Response of the bovine corpus luteum to increased secretion of luteinizing hormone induced by exogenous gonadotropin releasing hormone

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the response of the bovine corpus luteum to surges of luteinizing hormone (LH) induced by natural gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) administered twice during the same estrous cycle. In experiment 1, eight mature beef cows, each cow serving as her own control, were injected intravenously (iv) with saline on days 2 and 8 of the cycle (day of estrus = day 0 of the cycle), then with 100 micrograms GnRH on days 2 and 8 of the subsequent cycle. Jugular blood samples were taken immediately prior to an injection and at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120 and 240 min postinjection, to quantitate changes in serum luteinizing hormone. Blood was also collected on alternate days after an injection until day 16 of the cycle, to characterize changes in serum progesterone concentrations. Although exogenous GnRH caused release of LH on days 2 and 8 of the cycle, the quantity of LH released was greater on day 8 (P less than .025). Serum levels of progesterone after treatment with GnRH on day 8 of the cycle did not differ significantly from those observed during the control cycles of the heifers. Because exposure of the bovine corpus luteum to excess LH, induced by GnRH early during the estrous cycle, causes attenuated progesterone secretion during the same cycle, these data suggest that a second surge of endogenous LH may ameliorate the suppressive effect of the initial release of LH on luteal function. Duration of the estrous cycle was not altered by treatment (control, 20.4 +/- .5 vs. treated, 20.4 +/- .4 days).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of the dominant follicle aspiration before or after luteinizing hormone surge on the corpus luteum formation in the cow

Luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and follicle rupture act as trigger to start corpus luteum (CL) formation. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether a dominant follicle that has not been exposed to an LH surge can become a functional CL. For this purpose, follicular fluid from the dominant follicles (DF) of cows was aspirated before or after a GnRH-induced LH surge, and subsequent CL formation was observed. Holstein cows were divided into four groups as follows: Luteal phase, a DF was aspirated 7 days after GnRH injection; Pre-LH surge, a DF was aspirated 42 h after PGF(2alpha) injection during the mid luteal phase; Post-LH surge, a DF was aspirated 24 h after GnRH injection following PGF(2alpha); and Intact follicle, ovulation was induced by GnRH injection after PGF(2alpha). Observation of morphological changes in the aspirated follicle using color Doppler ultrasonography and blood sampling was performed on Days 0, 3, 6, and 9 (Day 0 = follicle aspiration). CL formation following DF aspiration was observed only in the Post-LH surge group. In both the Luteal phase and Pre-LH surge groups, however, none of the cows showed local blood flow at the aspirated site or CL formation. Luteal blood flow area, CL volume, and plasma progesterone concentration in the Post-LH surge group were no different from those in the Intact follicle group. The present results clearly demonstrate that rather than follicle rupture, it is the LH surge that is essential for CL formation in cows.