Immunochemical studies on a Brucella ovis specific protein antigen

A Brucella ovis surface protein antigen (P-II), obtained by gel filtration with Sepharose 4B of a hot saline extract was characterized. The analysis of P-II over gradient sodium dodecylsulfate electrophoresis yielded an 18.5 and a 20 kDa band. In a radioimmunoprecipitation assay using P-II labeled with 125I, the antigen reacted specifically only with sera from rams experimentally infected with a naturally occurring rough strain of B. ovis and did not react with sera from rams experimentally infected with other smooth Brucella strains (B. abortus and B. melitensis).     

An improved immunoblotting technique for the serodiagnosis of Brucella ovis infections

Two antigen preparations, the routinely used Brucella ovis sodium dodecylsulfate-mercapto ethanol extract and a B. ovis Triton X-114-derived detergent-rich phase, were compared under standard conditions for their use in electrophoretic immunoblotting for confirmafory, serological testing for B. ovis infections, by using 88 sera from ram flocks with a history of freedom from B. ovis infections, 80 sera from chronically infected rams, which were shedding B. ovis in their semen at the time of sampling, and 104 sera from a naturally infected ram flock. Blots with the detergent-rich phase as antigen gave better correlation with the serological results from naturally infected rams, exhibited no non-specific staining with sera from the negative group, gave clearer visualisation of specific bands for positive sera, and were equally sensitive when compared to the standard antigen for sera from chronically infected rams.     

Evaluation of surface components of Brucella ovis as antigens for the detection of precipitin antibody in serums from artificially exposed rams

Surface components of Brucella ovis obtained by gentle physical shearing were tested as a potentially useful source of reagent for selective serological diagnosis. These antigens were used in a radial immunodiffusion (RID) test against serum from rams which had been inoculated with infective semen containing B. ovis by one of 4 routes namely mating rams with ewes previously inoculated intravaginally with infective semen, or by direct inoculation in the prepuce, rectum or nasal passage. Loosely attached surface antigens in the RID test formed precipitin bands with serums collected from rams 2 and 10 weeks after inoculation. In contrast, a detergent extracted membrane antigen B developed precipitin bands only with serum collected 10 weeks after inoculation from rams confirmed bacteriologically to be infected with B. ovis in the genital tract. The route by which the rams were artificially exposed did not affect the outcome of the RID test using the membrane B antigen. However, all experimentally exposed rams had demonstrable CF titres when a heat extracted antigen was used.     

Comparison of three serological tests for Brucella ovis infection of rams using different antigenic extracts

The sensitivity and specificity of the complement fixation, gel diffusion and ELISA tests for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection of rams have been compared using three different antigenic preparations. The antigens obtained by petroleum ether - chloroform - phenol, or cold saline extractions gave poorer diagnostic results than those obtained by hot saline extraction in all the tests. The best sensitivity was obtained with the ELISA (97.6 per cent) followed by the gel diffusion (96.4 per cent) and complement fixation tests (92.7 per cent). The gel diffusion test detected as positive the two rams negative in the ELISA, while the complement fixation test did not improve the sensitivity of the other tests. Under these conditions all the tests were 100 per cent specific when testing sera from rams free of B ovis.     

Serology and semen culture for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in chronically infected rams

The serological response to Brucella ovis and the shedding of the organism in semen was followed for a period of 13-14 months in 42 naturally infected rams. Most rams remained chronically infected and excreted the organism in their semen throughout the investigation. B. ovis was isolated from 87.9% of the semen samples from the infected rams. The most common sites from which B. ovis could be isolated at necropsy were the epididymides and accessory sexual glands. In one ram the organism was isolated from lung, spleen, kidney and iliac lymph nodes. Three rams ceased to shed B. ovis in their semen during the course of the investigation. Seventy-five (11%) of 686 sera from infected rams were negative in the complement fixation test (CFT) although 76% and 77% of CFT-negative sera were positive in the gel diffusion precipitin test (GDT) and enzyme labelled immunosorbent assay (ELISA) respectively. The high incidence of CFT-negative infected rams was due to the selection for the investigation of many rams with histories of negative or vacillating CFT titres. Sera from five rams which never shed B. ovis in their semen reacted erratically in the three serological tests. The five rams were from heavily infected flocks and were kept in contact with infected rams throughout the investigation.     

Identification of immunoreactive membrane antigens of Brucella ovis by ELISA profiling

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) profiling was used to identify the immunoreactive membrane antigens of Brucella ovis. Immunoreactive membrane antigens obtained after detergent extraction of the bacterial membrane complex (inner and outer membranes) were resolved into five peaks (A, B, B1, C and D) by gel permeation chromatography. Aliquots from each of the chromatographed fractions were coupled to 96-well microtitre plates and immunoreactive fractions identified with sera from two rams. Serum from ram 1 which had been vaccinated with a single injection of formalin-killed B ovis emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant identified A and B as the major immunoreactive peaks. Serum from ram 2, which had been successfully infected with B ovis, reacted mainly against peaks A, B1, C and D. This observation facilitated the use of A, B, B1, C and D peak antigens as test reagents to examine the serological response of 12 other rams exposed to B ovis by vaccination or intraconjunctival or intravenous inoculation. Sera from rams which developed productive infections reacted strongly against peaks A, B1, C and D while vaccinated rams had preferential antibody activity against peaks A and B.     

The complement fixation test for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams--an Animal Health Division Report

Complement fixation tests using three B. ovis antigen preparations in warm fixation tests (WCFT) and cold fixation (CCFT) tests were done on 541 ram sera. Semen samples from the same rams were examined culturally to identify B. ovis excretors. The CCFT, using an antigen prepared by heat extraction of B. ovis cells, had a sensitivity of 97% in 124 rams which were shedding B.ovis. The specificity was 99% in 144 rams from non-infected flocks. Seventy-seven per cent of 156 rams which reacted to this test were shedding B. ovis in their semen. Tests with other antigens were inferior in sensitivity and/or specificity. The WCFT gave lower titres than CCFT. Vaccination caused large numbers of false positive reactions in 4 flocks.     

Transmission of Brucella ovis from rams to red deer stags

AIM: To determine whether B. ovis will transmit from infected rams to non-infected red deer stags (Cervus elaphus) grazing together in the same paddock. METHODS: Six rams artificially infected with B. ovis were grazed with six non-infected 14-month-old red deer stags for a four and a half month period from March 4 to July 20, 1999. Stags were blood sampled at one- to six-weekly intervals to test for B. ovis antibodies using a complement fixation test. Stags that seroconverted were semen sampled to test for B. ovis infection by bacteriological culture. RESULTS: Between day 92 and day 124 of grazing together (June 4 and July 6), sera from five of the six stags became positive in the B. ovis complement fixation test. B. ovis was cultured from semen samples from four of the seropositive stags. CONCLUSIONS: Brucella ovis can be transmitted from infected rams to non-infected stags grazing in the same paddock, suggesting that B. ovis infection in farmed deer in New Zealand initially came from infected rams. Whether transmission occurs from direct contact between rams or stags, or indirectly by environmental contamination needs to be established.     

Use of Brucella canis antigen for detection of ovine serum antibodies against Brucella ovis

Brucella ovis causes a genital disease of sheep manifested by epididymitis in rams and placentitis in ewes producing reduced fertility in the flock. Clinical diagnosis is not sensitive enough and bacteriological testing is not feasible for detection of the disease in large numbers of animals. Indirect methods of serological testing are preferred for routine diagnosis, of which agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID), complement fixation (CF) and ELISA tests are recommended as the most efficient. Since B. ovis shares antigenic components with Brucella canis, it would seem that either strain could be used as antigen with the same results; however, the advantage of the B. canis (M-) strain variant is that it can be used to develop a satisfactory antigen for agglutination tests. We present data on AGID and IELISA tests using B. ovis antigen and rapid screening agglutination test (RSAT), 2-mercapto-ethanol RSAT (2ME-RSAT) and IELISA using B. canis antigen. We tested 225 animals. The cut-off values were adjusted by ROC analysis using 51 negative and 32 positive sera; the IELISA-B. canis cut-off value was 39 (%P) and IELISA-B. ovis, 51 (%P), with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Of the 32 positive sera from the infected flock RSAT detected 32 (100%), 2ME-RSAT 29 (91%) and AGID 31 (97%). Of the 142 sera from suspicious flocks, 46 were negative and 56 positive in all the tests; 16 were positive by RSAT, IELISA-B. canis and IELISA-B. ovis, 20 positive only with RSAT and 2 positive only by both IELISAs. RSAT is a very sensitive screening test that, because of its simplicity and easy interpretation, following a study in larger sample, could replace AGID as a screening test for diagnosis of ovine brucellosis caused by B. ovis. The IELISA-B. canis or IELISA-B. ovis could be used as confirmatory tests, since they show equal specificity and sensitivity.     

Use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies to Brucella ovis in sheep: field trial

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using an autoclave-extracted soluble antigen, for the detection of serum antibodies to Brucella ovis in sheep was developed. The test seemed to be both sensitive and specific, on the basis of the control groups studied. The antigen showed no deterioration in prepared plates stored at -70 C for up to a year. The ELISA was used in conjunction with palpation of rams for epididymal lesions as a means to detect and control B ovis infection in a naturally infected flock. All rams were evaluated by the ELISA. At the time that the first blood sample was obtained, all positive and suspicious reactors were removed. With subsequent blood sample collections, only the positive reactors were removed. Brucella ovis was not isolated from any rams during the following year, and none of the mature breeding rams developed epididymal lesions.     

Detection of antibody in rams with contagious epididymitis, using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using whole-cell and sonicated antigens prepared from Brucella ovis, Actinobacillus seminis, and Actinobacillus seminis-like cultures isolated from rams in Wyoming, was able to detect antibody to these antigens in rams with epididymitis. The whole-cell antigens used in this procedure gave lower background values, compared with those of the sonicated antigens. The procedure was able to detect antibody in rams before clinical signs of epididymitis became apparent.     

Observations on the eradication of Brucella ovis infection from a ram flock

The measures taken to eradicate Brucella ovis infection from a naturally infected flock of 64 rams are described. Lesions of epididymitis were detected in 18 rams, all of which gave either positive or suspicious reactions in the complement fixation test. A further 20 rams gave serological reactions in the complement fixation test. Subsequently, semen was collected from 14 of these 20 rams and B. ovis was cultured from the semen of all 14 rams. Serum samples from two rams failed to react in the complement fixation test. However, they were identified as infected with the aid of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the subsequent culture of semen samples. It is suggested that, when eradicating B. ovis infection from ram flocks, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay be used in addition to both the complement fixation test and the physical examination. Using a combination of tests as described can increase the likehood of an earlier eradication of B. ovis infection.     

Single-step purification and evaluation of recombinant BP26 protein for serological diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams

To investigate the value of the BP26 protein in the serological diagnosis of ovine brucellosis caused by Brucella ovis, recombinant BP26 protein was produced in Echerichia coli and purified for use in an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA). The majority of the recombinant protein was recovered from the supernatant of sonicated recombinant E. coli cells in a soluble form. This facilitated the purification of the recombinant BP26 protein which was achieved by using ion-exchange chromatography. After one step of purification, the purity of the recombinant BP26 protein was analyzed by using SDS-PAGE, Coomassie blue staining, and Western blot with a monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against the BP26 protein. The degree of purity appeared satisfactory so that it could be directly used in I-ELISA. Although the recombinant BP26-ELISA appeared less useful than I-ELISA using the B. ovis hot saline (HS) extract as antigen, the high number of sera from B. ovis infected rams found positive (90%) in the recombinant BP26-I-ELISA indicated that the BP26 protein may be an additional suitable antigen for serological diagnosis of B. ovis infection in rams.     

Immune response in rams experimentally infected with Brucella ovis

Cellular as well as humoral immune responses were detected in six rams experimentally infected with Brucella ovis. Specific antibodies were detectable by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by day 11 after infection in all the rams. The levels of IgM antibodies and total antibodies in the serum rose until 33 and 41 days after infection respectively, then levelled off. Antigen-induced blastogenic responses by lymphocytes developed as early as five days after infection in all rams but had decreased to low levels by day 63 in most. Blastogenesis induced by phytohaemagglutinin and concanavalin A varied among infected rams and did not differ significantly (P greater than 0.05) from control rams. All rams had developed delayed-type skin hypersensitivity by day 63 after infection. One ram which did not become infected as a result of exposure had low levels of B ovis serum antibodies and a detectable antigen-induced lymphocyte blastogenic response before infection, suggesting the involvement of cell-mediated immunity in protection against B ovis.     

A comparison of three serological tests for the diagnosis of B. ovis infection in rams

The complement fixation test (CFT), the enzyme labelled immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the gel diffusion precipitin test (GD) were compared, for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams. The sensitivities of the tests in 109 rams which were shedding B. ovis in their semen were: CFT 96.3%; ELISA 97.2%; GD 91.7%. The specificities of the tests in 141 rams from non-infected flocks were: CFI 99.3%; ELISA 98.6%; GD 100%. Predictive values of the three tests were measured in 285 rams from infected flocks. Thirty-eight percent of these rams were shedding B. ovis in their semen. Predictive values of positive tests were: CFT 75.5%; ELISA 66.7%; GD 72.5%. Predictive values of negative tests were: CFI 97.1%; ELISA 97.6%; GD 93.8%.     

Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibody to Brucella ovis was compared with a standard complement fixation test. Sera of 176 rams from uninfected flocks gave 175 negative and one suspect ELISA reaction (diagnostic specificity 99.4%) whereas the complement fixation test yielded 167 negative, seven suspect and two anticomplementary reactions (diagnostic specificity of 96.0%). Diagnostic sensitivity was evaluated on sera of 79 rams from which B. ovis had been isolated. The ELISA showed 75 positive and four suspect reactions, while complement fixation test revealed 64 positive, 13 suspect and two negative results. Considering both positive and suspect reactions, the diagnostic sensitivity was 100% for ELISA and 97.5% for complement fixation test. The ELISA method was considered more specific, more sensitive and technically more advantageous than complement fixation test as a serodiagnostic test for B. ovis infection in rams.     

Comparison of different antigenic preparations for the detection of ovine serum antibodies against Brucella ovis by ELISA

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay has been developed for the detection of antibodies against Brucella ovis using serum from control rams (Con-S), naturally infected rams (Inf-S), rams inoculated intravenously with B. ovis (IV-S) and rams vaccinated intramuscularly (IM-S). The serum was titrated by serial double dilutions from 1/25 to 1/25,600 against whole bacteria, B. ovis lipopolysaccharide and a detergent-extracted component of the outer membrane complex of B. ovis as antigens immobilised on microtitre plates. Sheep antibodies bound to antigen were assayed with rabbit anti-sheep gammaglobulin and alkaline phosphatase conjugated protein A. A high level of antibody activity against intact B. ovis cells was detected in Inf-S and IM-S. When lipopolysaccharide was the immobilised antigen, only IM-S yielded significant antibody activity. The component from detergent extracts of the outer membrane complex of B. ovis reacted best with serum (up to 1/6,400) from field-infected rams, while serum from vaccinated and intravenously inoculated rams registered significant titres up to a serum dilution of 1/800 and 1/200 respectively. These results indicate that ELISA is a very sensitive test but its value as a serodiagnostic procedure is dependent upon the choice of antigen used in the assay.     

Temporal ELISA response of rams to Brucella ovis following experimental infection or vaccination

Sera from rams vaccinated with antigens extracted chaotropically from Brucella ovis by potassium thiocyanate treatment were used to optimise a whole-cell, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CELISA) and to monitor the temporal serological response of rams which had been challenged with infected semen by the intranasal or intrapreputial route. Three patterns of CELISA response were detected. Thirteen of 15 rams intranasally challenged did not respond serologically (pattern 1 or nil response). Only one of 15 rams in the intranasal group exhibited a rise and fall response with CELISA (pattern 2), while another showed a rise and surge response (pattern 3). The numbers of rams in the intrapreputial group which displayed a pattern 1 or 2 or 3 response were four, nine and two, respectively. No ram with a pattern 2 response excreted B ovis in the semen or showed any other evidence of infection, whereas rams with a pattern 3 response excreted B ovis in the semen and developed palpable lesions. Intrapreputially challenged rams that were CELISA-positive consistently mounted an antibody response against B ovis about two to four weeks earlier than intranasally challenged rams.     

Serological, bacteriological and pathological changes in rams following different routes of exposure to Brucella ovis

Mature Merino rams were exposed to Brucella ovis by contact with infected semen, using either ewe transmission, intrapreputial, intranasal or intrarectal inoculation of infected semen or intrapreputial inoculation of B. ovis culture. Thirty-six of the 41 rams developed significant complement fixation (CF) test titres, but only 9 of these reactors showed clinical, bacteriological or pathological evidence of infection. Infection occurred in some of the rams from all groups. The results are discussed in relation to the transmission of the disease and the significance of CF titres in rams exposed to B. ovis.     

Evaluation of an enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams

A simple enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for the serological diagnosis of Brucella ovis infections in rams. Serums from brucellosis accredited-free flocks and flocks known to be infected with B. ovis were tested and the results correlated with warm complement fixation (CF) test and bacteriological examination of semen. Both the ELISA and the CF test detected 0.5% false positive reactions in rams from clinically negative flocks. However the ELISA detected significantly more positive reactors in infected flocks and the CF test failed to detect some rams excreting B. ovis. The ELISA proved to be a valuable test in eradicating brucellosis from infected flocks.