Concomitance of luteinizing hormone and progesterone oscillations during the transition from preluteolysis to luteolysis in cattle

The temporal relationships of episodes of luteinizing hormone (LH) oscillations, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α (PGFM) pulses, and progesterone (P4) fluctuations during the latter portion of preluteolysis and the early portion of luteolysis were characterized. In Experiment 1, the detection of LH episodes in blood samples collected every 15 min for 8 h was compared with detection in the samples collected every hour in 4 heifers. The number of independently detected episodes/heifer (total = 7) was the same for the 15-min and hourly collection intervals. In Experiment 2, blood samples were collected every hour (n = 7 heifers) and retrospectively assigned to 15 h before and 15 h after the transitional hour between preluteolysis and luteolysis. During preluteolysis, compared with luteolysis, the amplitude of LH oscillations was greater (0.28 ± 0.03 vs 0.18 ± 0.03 ng/mL; P < 0.02) and the interval between peaks of LH oscillations was shorter (3.3 ± 0.3 h vs 4.3 ± 0.6 h; P < 0.04). The LH peaks occurred at the same hour as the peak of a P4 fluctuation in 77% and 29% of LH oscillations (P < 0.0009) during preluteolysis and luteolysis, respectively. In preluteolysis, synchrony between LH and P4 episodes occurred consistently during the P4 rebound after the peak of a PGFM pulse. In luteolysis, the LH peak preceded the peak of the P4 rebound. On a temporal basis, the hypothesis was supported that episodic LH accounts, at least in part, for the reported P4 rebound that occurs after the P4 suppression at the peak of a PGFM pulse.     

Influence of dose, frequency, and duration of infused gonadotropin-releasing hormone on secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in nutritionally anestrous beef cows.

Nutritionally induced anovulatory cows were ovariectomized and used to determine the relationships between dose, frequency, and duration of exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulses and amplitude, frequency, and concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in serum. In Experiment 1, cows were given pulses of saline (control) or 2 micrograms of GnRH infused i.v. during a 0.1-, 1.25-, 5-, 10-, or 20-min period. Concentrations of LH and FSH during 35 min after GnRH infusion were greater than in control cows (P < 0.01), and FSH concentrations were greater when GnRH infusions were for 10 min or less compared with 20 min. In Experiment 2, the effect of GnRH pulse frequency and dose on LH and FSH concentrations, pulse frequency, and pulse amplitude were determined. Exogenous GnRH (0, 2, or 4 micrograms) was infused in 5 min at frequencies of once every hour or once every 4th hr for 3 d. There was a dose of GnRH x frequency x day effect on LH and FSH concentrations (P < 0.01), indicating that gonadotropes are sensitive to changes in pulse frequency, dose, and time of exposure to GnRH. There were more LH pulses when GnRH was infused every hour, compared with an infusion every 4th hr (P < 0.04). Amplitudes of LH pulses were greater with increased GnRH dose (P < 0.05), and there was a frequency x dose x day effect on FSH pulse amplitude (P < 0.0006). We conclude that LH and FSH secretion in the bovine is differentially regulated by frequency and dose of GnRH infusions.     

Effect of metoclopramide on luteinizing hormone secretion in postpartum anestrous cows.

The effect of metoclopramide (MC), a dopamine antagonist on luteinizing hormone (LH), was examined in anestrous primaparous cows. Metoclopramide has been found to be beneficial in overcoming fescue toxicosis; increasing LH secretion stimulates return to ovulatory function after parturition. Consequently, if MC had negative effect on LH secretion, it would indicate that administration of MC to reproducing animals might be limited. Of 14 postpartum (47 to 66 days) cows, 7 were given MC (4 mg/kg of body weight, IV), and 7 served as controls. Blood was obtained via jugular cannulas at 15-minute intervals for 8 hours; MC was given at the end of the first hour, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH, 7 mg/kg), was given IV at the end of hour 7 as a challenge stimulus for LH secretion. Prior to GnRH administration, MC did not have significant effect on LH secretion, as judged by mean serum LH concentration, LH pulse frequency, and LH pulse amplitude. Administration of MC resulted in greater (P less than 0.05) LH response to GnRH, indicating enhanced secretory ability when the pituitary gland was challenged. Serum prolactin concentration was increased (P less than 0.01) by MC administration. Therefore, MC did not have adverse effect on LH secretion in postpartum cows.     

The effect of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone and estradiol administration on luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations in pituitary stalk-sectioned ovariectomized pony mares

Hourly pulses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or bi-daily injections of estradiol (E2) can increase luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized, anestrous pony mares. However, the site (pituitary versus hypothalamus) of positive feedback of estradiol on gonadotropin secretion has not been described in mares. Thus, one of our objectives involved investigating the feedback of estradiol on the pituitary. The second objective consisted of determining if hourly pulses of GnRH could re-establish physiological LH and FSH concentrations after pituitary stalk-section (PSS), and the third objective was to describe the declining time trends of LH and FSH secretion after PSS. During summer months, ovariectomized pony mares were divided into three groups: Group 1 (control, n = 2), Group 2 (pulsatile GnRH (25 μg/hr), n = 3), and Group 3 (estradiol (5 mg/12 hr), n = 3). All mares were stalk-sectioned and treatment begun immediately after stalk-section. Blood samples were collected every 30 min for 8 h on the day before surgery (DO) and 5 d post surgery (D5) to facilitate the comparison of gonadotropin levels before and after pituitary stalk-section. Additionally, jugular blood samples were collected every 12 hr beginning the evening of surgery, allowing for evaluation of the gonadotropin secretory time trends over the 10 d of treatment. On Day 10, animals were euthanized to confirm pituitary stalk-section and to submit tissue for messenger RNA analysis (parallel study). Plasma samples were assayed for LH and FSH by RIA. Mean LH secretion decreased from Day 0 to Day 5 in Groups 1 and 3, whereas LH secretion tended (P < 0.08) to decrease in Group 2 mares. On Day 5, LH was higher (P < 0.01) in Group 2 (17.26 ± 3.68 ng/ml; LSMEANS ± SEM), than either Group 1 (2.65 ± 4.64 ng/ml) or group 3 (4.28 ± 3.68 ng/ml). Group 1 did not differ from Group 3 on Day 5 (P < 0.40). Similarly, mean FSH levels decreased in all groups after surgery, yet Group 2 mares had significantly (P < 0.001) higher FSH concentrations (17.66 ± 1.53 ng/ml) than Group 1 or Group 3 (8.34 ± 1.84 and 7.69 ± 1. 63 ng/ml, respectively). Regression analysis of bi-daily LH and FSH levels indicated that the time trends were not parallel. These findings indicate: 1) Pituitary stalk-section lowered LH and FSH to undetectable levels within 5 d after surgery, 2) pulsatile administration of GnRH (25 μg/hr) maintained LH and FSH secretion, although concentrations tended to be lower than on Day 0, and 3) E2 did not stimulate LH or FSH secretion.     

Effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist and altrenogest on luteinizing hormone concentration and ovulation in the mare

The objective of Experiment 1 was to determine a dose and frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration to effectively suppress serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentration and to delay ovulation when administered to mares. The objectives of Experiment 2 were 1) to determine the effects of subcutaneous or intravenous administration of a GnRH antagonist or oral altrenogest on serum LH concentration in the estrual mare; and 2) to determine the effectiveness of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in inducing ovulation in mares with suppressed LH concentrations. In Experiment 1, mares (N = 20) were randomly assigned and treated with either 5% mannitol (control, single subcutaneous injection, 1 mL, at time 0; n = 5); low-dose GnRH antagonist (single subcutaneous injection, 0.01 mg/kg, at time 0; n = 5); frequent low-dose GnRH antagonist (subcutaneous injections, 0.01 mg/kg, at 0, 6, 18, and 24 hours; n = 5); or high-dose GnRH antagonist (single subcutaneous injection, 0.04 mg/kg, at time 0; n = 5). Both the frequent low-dose and high-dose GnRH antagonist treatments resulted in significantly lower LH concentrations compared with controls at 90, 102, and 114 hours after treatment (P < .05). In Experiment 2, mares (N = 38) were randomly assigned and treated with subcutaneous sterile saline (control), altrenogest (oral), subcutaneous GnRH antagonist, or intravenous GnRH antagonist. LH concentration for the altrenogest group was lower than the control group at 3, 4, 18, and 30 hours after treatment (P < .05). LH concentration for both the subcutaneous and intravenous GnRH antagonist groups were lower compared with the control group at several time points (P < .05). Based on these data, dose but not frequency of administration of a GnRH antagonist lowered LH concentration in the estrous mare but did not delay ovulation. In addition, serum LH concentrations can be lowered and ovulation effectively postponed in mares treated with altrenogest followed by administration of hCG. This indicates that serum LH concentrations can be lowered and ovulation effectively postponed in mares treated with altrenogest followed by administration of hCG.     

GnRH antagonist inhibition of gonadotropin and steroid secretion in boars in vivo and steroid production in vitro

The hormone GnRH has a stimulatory effect on gonadotropin synthesis and secretion. The objective of the first study was to evaluate concentrations of FSH and LH in plasma of boars after successive treatment with SB75, a GnRH antagonist. Thirteen boars greater than 1 yr of age (eight White Composite [WC] and five Meishan [MS]) were injected once daily with SB75 (10 microg/kg of body weight) for 4 d. Plasma concentrations of LH and testosterone (T) decreased after 1 h from the first dose of SB75. After 12 h of treatment, LH gradually returned to pretreatment concentrations, but T remained suppressed (< 2 ng/mL) until after the last injection of SB75. There was a modest, but significant, reduction in FSH during treatment with SB75. The prolonged inhibitory effect of SB75 on suppression of plasma T concentrations, in the presence of pretreatment concentrations of LH, implied direct effects of SB75 at the testis. In the second experiment, testicular tissue from adult boars was incubated in the presence of three doses of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; 0, .5, and 5 IU) with SB75 (250 ng/mL) or with Deslorelin, a GnRH agonist (500 ng/mL). Samples of media were collected every hour for 3 h, and concentrations of T and estrone (E1) were determined by RIA. Concentrations of T and E1 increased with time in response to treatment with hCG. Co-treatment with SB75 decreased media concentrations of T (P < .01) and E1 (P < .03) compared to controls (77.9 vs 85.7 +/- 2.0 and 4.7 vs 5.3 +/- .2 ng/g). In contrast, treatment with Deslorelin had no effect on the amount of T (P > .50) or E1 (P > .26) released with all dosages of hCG. These results indicate that a GnRH antagonist has a direct effect on the testis, decreasing amounts of T and E1 released from the Leydig cells; however, treatment with a GnRH agonist had no direct effect on release of these gonadal steroids. Thus, it remains unresolved whether the site of action of GnRH antagonist on testicular steroidogenesis is through a testicular GnRH receptor or through some other mechanism.     

Luteolysis and associated interrelationships among circulating PGF2α, progesterone, LH, and estradiol in mares

The changing concentrations and temporal relationships among a PGF2α metabolite (PGFM), progesterone (P₄), LH, and estradiol-17β (E₂) before, during, and after luteolysis were studied in 10 mares. Blood samples were collected every hour for ≥4 d beginning on day 12 after ovulation. The luteolytic period extended from a decrease in P₄ at a common transitional hour (Hour 0) at the end of preluteolysis and beginning of luteolysis to a defined ending when P₄ reached 1 ng/mL. The length of luteolysis was 22.9 ± 0.9 h, contrasting with 2 d in published P₄ profiles from sampling every 6 to 24 h. In mares with complete data for Hours −40 to −2 (n = 6), PGFM concentrations remained below assay sensitivity (n = 2) or two or three small pulses (peak, 29 ± 4 pg/mL) occurred. During luteolysis, the pulses became more prominent (peak, 193 ± 36 pg/mL). Rhythmicity of PGFM pulses was not detected by a pulsatility program during preluteolysis but was detected in seven of nine mares during luteolysis and postluteolysis combined. The nadir-to-nadir interval for LH pulses and the peak-to-peak interval between adjacent pulses were longer (P < 0.05) during preluteolysis than during luteolysis (nadir to nadir, 5.2 ± 0.3 h vs 3.6 ± 0.4 h; peak to peak, 9.4 ± 1.0 h vs 4.7 ± 0.5 h). Unlike reported findings in cattle, concentrations of P₄ decreased linearly within the hours of each PGFM pulse during luteolysis, and a positive effect of an LH pulse on P₄ and E₂ concentration was not detected. The reported balancing of P₄ concentrations between a negative effect of PGF2α and a positive effect of LH in heifers was not detected in mares.     

Relationships of gonadotropins, testosterone, and cortisol in response to GnRH and GnRH antagonist in boars selected for high and low follicle-stimulating hormone levels

Considerable variation exists in the serum levels of gonadotropins in boars; this results in differential testicular function. Boars (Chinese Meishan, European White composite, and crosses of the two breeds) selected for high and low circulating FSH concentrations were used to define possible differences in pituitary sensitivity to GnRH and GnRH antagonist and gonadal and adrenal responses. After a 2-h pretreatment sampling period, boars were injected with GnRH or GnRH antagonist and repetitively sampled via jugular cannula for changes in serum concentrations of FSH, LH, testosterone, and cortisol. In response to varying doses of GnRH or GnRH antagonist, FSH, LH, or testosterone changes were not different in high- or low-FSH boars. Declines in LH after GnRH stimulation were consistently faster in boars selected for high FSH. Chinese Meishan boars had considerably higher cortisol concentrations than White composite boars (132.2 +/- 28.5 vs 67.4 +/- 26.8 ng/mL, respectively; P < .01). When select high- and low-gonadotropin Meishan:White composite crossbreds were sampled, cortisol levels were elevated but comparable between the two groups (126.5 +/- 13.7 vs 131.4 +/- 13.4 ng/mL, respectively). After GnRH antagonist lowered LH concentrations, administration of hCG resulted in increased testosterone and cortisol concentrations. Although testosterone concentrations remained high for 30 h, cortisol concentrations returned to normal levels within 10 h after hCG injection. The mechanism by which boars selected for high gonadotropins achieve increased levels of LH and FSH may not be due to differences in pituitary sensitivity to GnRH but to differences in clearance from the circulation.     

Induction of ovulation in the prepuberal gilt by pulsatile administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone

An attempt was made to induce precocious puberty in gilts approximately 164 days of age by stimulating a luteinizing hormone (LH) secretory pattern similar to that which occurs before normal onset of puberty. Hourly iv administration of 1 μg synthetic gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) for 7 or 8 days resulted in a mean serum LH concentration of 1.7 ± .3 ng/ml in three treated gilts compared with .9 ± .1 ng/ml in three control gilts (P<.08). Serum LH peak frequency was also greater (P<.05) in treated (3.4 ± .5 peaks/4 hr) than in control gilts (1.2 ± .1 peaks/4 hr), but serum LH peak amplitude was not altered (P>.33) by GnRH treatment. All treated gilts displayed estrus and ovulated within 6 days after treatment began, and all control gilts remained prepuberal throughout the study (P=.05). Only one of the three treated gilts displayed a normal estrous cycle and reovulated after treatment. Precocious ovulation but not puberty was induced in gilts by hourly administration of 1 μg synthetic GnRH, indicating that the pituitary and ovaries of 164-day-old gilts are competent and that final sexual maturation occurs at the hypothalamic level.     

Effects of chronic gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment on serum luteinizing hormone and testosterone concentrations in boars.

Mature boars were subjected to chronic treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, goserelin (D-Ser[But]6, Azgly-NH210), and serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone concentrations were measured. Ten sexually mature boars were randomly assigned to treatment (n = 5) or control (n = 5) groups. On day 0, boars were implanted sc (day 0) with 2 GnRH agonist implants (1 mg of GnRH/implant) or sham implants. Blood samples were collected at 12-hour intervals on days -2 and -1, at 6-hour intervals on days 0 through 4, and at 12-hour intervals on days 5 through 8. In addition, blood samples were collected at 15-minute intervals for 6 hours on days -1, 0, 4, and 8. Serum testosterone and LH concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay. Maximal LH (7 +/- 1 ng/ml) and testosterone (26 +/- 3 ng/ml) concentrations were observed at 5 and 18 hours, respectively, after GnRH agonist treatment. Subsequently, LH and testosterone concentrations decreased to pretreatment values (0.3 +/- 0.1 ng/ml and 1.8 +/- 0.4 ng/ml, respectively) by 24 and 48 hours, respectively, after GnRH agonist implantation. Few differences in the characteristics of pulsatile LH release were observed between the groups. Testosterone and LH concentrations in samples collected at 6- and 12-hour intervals and pulsatile LH release did not change after sham treatment of control boars. Whereas previous reports indicated that chronic GnRH administration suppressed serum LH and testosterone concentrations in rams, rats, and dogs, our results indicate that chronic GnRH agonist treatment induced transitory increases, without subsequent suppression, in LH and testosterone concentrations in mature boars.     

Comparison of luteinizing hormone and steroid hormone secretion during the peri- and post-ovulatory periods in Mangalica and Landrace gilts

The objective of this study was to determine plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone (P4) and estradiol-17beta (E2) in Mangalica gilts (M), a Hungarian native breed, and compare them with Landrace gilts (L) during the peri- and post-ovulatory periods. The estrous cycle of gilts was synchronised by Regumate feeding, and ovulation was induced with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. Blood sampling was carried out via indwelling jugular catheters three times a day and in 2-h intervals during a 16-h period after the GnRH application. The concentrations of LH, E2 and P4 were determined by immunoassays. Gilts of both breeds showed a typical gonadotropin and gonadal hormone secretion pattern. Preovulatory E2 peaks were observed on day 2 (M) and day 4 (L) after the last Regumate feeding. Highest E2 concentration was different between M and L breeds (46.5 +/- 5.7 vs. 26.0 +/- 6.8 pg/ml, P < 0.05). Maximum LH levels measured up to 6 h after GnRH were not different between M and L breeds (11.5 +/- 4.1 vs. 6.6 +/- 2.3 ng/ml). Both LH amounts during surge (41.1 +/- 15.9 vs. 27.5 +/- 6.1 ng/ml) and total over LH release (73.4 +/- 22.2 vs. 50.0 +/- 8.7 ng/ml) did not differ significantly between M and L breeds. P4 concentrations started to rise on day 6 after Regumate feeding and increased significantly from 0.6 +/- 0.3 and 0.7 +/- 0.4 ng/ml to maximal 14.0 +/- 2.4 and 11.3 +/- 2.1 ng/ml in M and L breeds, respectively. Mean P4 secretion was higher in M on days 10-15 (12.9 +/- 2.6 vs. 9.3 +/- 2.2 ng/ml; P<0.05). At the same time the number of corpora lutea was lower in M compared to L (10.3 +/-1.5 vs. 17.8 +/- 5.0, P<0.05). In our experiment, there was no evidence that differences in the secretion of analysed hormones during the peri- and post-ovulatory periods are a possible cause of usually lower fecundity in Mangalica gilts.     

Influences of season and artificial photoperiod on stallions: luteinizing hormone follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone

Influence of day length on seasonal endocrine responses were studied using stallions (seven per group). Treatments included 1) control, with natural day length; 2) 8 h light and 16 h dark (8:16) for 20 wk beginning July 16, 1982 then 16:8 from December 2, 1982 until March 5, 1984 (S-L); or 3) 8:16 from July 16, 1982 until March 5, 1984 (S-S). Blood was sampled hourly for 5 h every 4 wk; sera were pooled within horse, and luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and testosterone were quantified. Blood was collected every 20 min for 24 h every 8 wk and 2 wk before and after the December light shift. Samples were assayed for LH. Stallions in all groups underwent seasonal changes (P less than .05) in concentrations of LH, FSH, testosterone and basal concentrations of LH and amplitude of LH pulses. Season X treatment (P less than .05) reflected on early recrudescence of LH, FSH and testosterone concentrations in S-L stallions followed by earlier regression. Except for FSH hormone concentrations were depressed in S-S stallions. Number of LH pulses per 24 h was unaffected by season, treatment or their interaction. Mean amplitude of LH pulses was affected (P less than .05) by season X treatment; maximal values occurred in April vs February for control and S-L stallions, and minimal values occurred in December vs April. The season X treatment interaction (P less than .05) similarly affected basal concentrations of LH. Thus, seasonal changes in concentrations of LH, FSH and testosterone can be driven by photoperiod. Increased peripheral concentrations of LH during seasonal recrudescence of reproductive function apparently results from more LH secreted per discharge without an increased frequency of LH discharges.     

Effect of subluteal concentrations of progesterone on luteinizing hormone and ovulation in lactating dairy cows

Two experiments were conducted to determine if administration of progesterone within a low, subluteal range (0.1-1.0 ng/mL) blocks the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge (experiments 1 and 2) and ovulation (experiment 2) in lactating dairy cows. In experiment 1, progesterone was administered to cycling, lactating dairy cows during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle using a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device. CIDRs were pre-incubated in other cows for either 0 (CIDR-0), 14 (CIDR-14) or 28 days (CIDR-28). One group of cows received no CIDRs and served as controls. One day after CIDR insertion, luteolysis was induced by two injections of prostaglandin (PG) F(2alpha) (25 mg) at 12 h intervals. Two days after the first injection, estradiol cypionate (ECP; 3 mg) was injected to induce a LH surge. Concentrations of progesterone after luteolysis were 0.11, 0.45, 0.78 and 1.20 ng/mL for cows treated with no CIDR, CIDR-28, CIDR-14, and CIDR-0, respectively. LH surges were detected in 4/4 controls, 4/5 CIDR-28, 2/5 CIDR-14 and 0/5 CIDR-0 cows following ECP. In experiment 2, progesterone was administered to cycling, lactating, Holstein cows during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle as in experiment 1. Luteolysis was induced as in experiment 1. The occurrence of an endogenous LH surge and ovulation were monitored for 7 days. Concentrations of progesterone after luteolysis were 0.13, 0.30, 0.70 and 1.20 ng/mL for cows treated with no CIDR, CIDR-28, CIDR-14 and CIDR-0, respectively. LH surges and ovulation were detected in 5/5 controls, 3/7 CIDR-28, 0/5 CIDR-14 and 0/5 CIDR-0 cows. It was concluded that low concentrations of progesterone can reduce the ability of either endogenous or exogenous estradiol to induce a preovulatory surge of LH and ovulation.     

Effects of estradiol-17 beta, naloxone and gonadotropin releasing hormone on postpartum secretion of luteinizing hormone in fall-lambing ewes

The interaction among exogenous estradiol-17 beta, naloxone and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) in the control of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion was studied in intact postpartum ewes nursing their offspring. One-half of 30 fall-lambing ewes were implanted subcutaneously with an estradiol-17 beta containing Silastic capsule between postpartum d 1 and 12 which doubled their serum concentrations of estradiol (16.0 +/- .1 vs 8.4 +/- .1 pg/ml). Blood samples were collected from implanted and non-implanted ewes at 15-min intervals for 5 h on d 3, 8, 13, 20 and 28 postpartum. Pre-injection samples were collected for 1 h, and ewes were injected with saline, naloxone (NAL;1 mg/kg) or GnRH (100 micrograms/ewe). When averaged across all days and implant groups, serum LH in the three post-NAL samples was higher (P less than .05) than in the three pre-NAL samples (3.6 +/- 1.2 vs .6 +/- .2 ng/ml). Post-GnRH concentrations of serum LH were lower (P less than .05) in estradiol-implanted ewes than in non-implanted ewes on d 8 and 13, but there were no differences in any LH characteristics on d 20 and 28 after implant removal on d 12. In non-implanted ewes, serum LH responses to GnRH increased (P less than .05) eightfold from d 3 (3.8 +/- 1.4 ng/ml) to d 8 (31.6 +/- 1.4 ng/ml), remained elevated through d 20, but declined by d 28 (10.8 +/- 1.4 ng/ml).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Orexin-B modulates luteinizing hormone and growth hormone secretion from porcine pituitary cells in culture

To test the hypothesis that orexin-B acts directly on the anterior pituitary to regulate LH and growth hormone (GH) secretion, anterior pituitary cells from prepuberal gilts were studied in primary culture. On day 4 of culture, 10(5) cells/well were challenged with 0.1, 10 or 1000 nM GnRH; 10, 100 or 1000 nM [Ala15]-hGRF-(1-29)NH2 or 0.1, 1, 10 or 100 nM, orexin-B individually or in combinations with 0.1 and 1000 nM GnRH or 10 and 1000 nM GRF. Secreted LH and GH were measured at 4 h after treatment. Basal LH and GH secretion (control; n = 6 pigs) was 183 +/- 18 and 108 +/- 4.8 ng/well, respectively. Relative to control at 4 h, all doses of GnRH and GRF increased (P < 0.0001) LH and GH secretion, respectively. All doses of orexin-B increased (P < 0.01) LH secretion, except for the 0.1 nM dose. Basal GH secretion was unaffected by orexin-B. Addition of 1, 10 or 100 nM orexin-B in combinations with 0.1 nM GnRH increased (P < 0.001) LH secretion compared to GnRH alone. Only 0.1 nM (P = 0.06) and 100 nM (P < 0.001) orexin-B in combinations with 1000 nM GnRH increased LH secretion compared to GnRH alone. All doses of orexin-B in combination with 1000 nM GRF suppressed (P < 0.0001) GH secretion compare to GRF alone, while only 0.1 nM orexin-B in combination with 10 nM GRF suppressed (P < 0.01) GH secretion compared to GRF. These results indicate that orexin may directly modulate LH and GH secretion at the level of the pituitary gland.     

Release of luteinizing hormone after administration of naloxone in pre- and peripuberal heifers.

This study was conducted to investigate regulation of LH release by opioid peptides during puberal development in beef heifers. Fourteen heifers were randomly assigned to receive naloxone (opioid antagonist) i.v. at dosages of either 1 mg.kg BW-1.wk-1 (Dose 1) or .25 mg.kg BW-1.wk-1 (Dose 2) for 13 wk or until puberty. Blood was sampled (one sample every 15 min) 6 h before (prenaloxone) and 2 h after naloxone administration. Two hours after naloxone administration, GnRH (10 ng/kg BW) was administered and blood was sampled for 1 h. Nine heifers attained puberty during the study. There were no differences between naloxone dosage groups for any measured variables. Therefore, heifers were grouped dependent on the attainment of puberty. Prenaloxone concentrations of serum LH and LH pulse frequency were normal for prepuberal heifers. Serum LH concentrations increased within 30 min after naloxone 135 of 139 times it was administered (P less than .05). Serum LH concentrations during the hour after naloxone were higher (P less than .05) than those during the hour before naloxone in both puberal and nonpuberal heifers. In puberal heifers, serum LH pulse height during the hour after naloxone was greater (P less than .02) at 5 wk before puberty and lower (P less than .02) the week before puberty than at other times during the trial. There was no effect of week on serum LH pulse height after naloxone in heifers that failed to attain puberty during the study. Response of LH to GnRH was similar between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of sodium pentobarbital on release of gonadotropins in ewes immediately after ovariectomy and after treatment with gonadotropin-releas ing hormone

Two experiments were conducted with ewes 9 to 11 days after estrus to determine whether the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are controlled differentially. In experiment 1, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was injected (100 (μg/ewe) at time = 0 min into ewes in four treatment groups. The treatment groups (9 ewes/group) were: 1) periodic iv sodium pentobarbital (NaPen) vehicle from 0 min; 2) periodic iv NaPen from 0 min; 3) vehicle iv for 120 min then iv NaPen from 120 min; 4) vehicle iv for 150 min then iv NaPen from 150 min. A surgical plane of anesthesia was maintained from the initiation of NaPen injection until the experiment ended. Jugular blood was sampled at 30-min intervals from ?30 to + 210 min for LH and FSH assays, and profiles of hormone concentrations were compared by time-trend analyses. GnRH released LH (P<.001) and FSH (P<.001), but NaPen did not affect the profiles of hormone concentrations; this indicated that NaPen did not reduce the ability of the pituitary to secrete gonadotropins in response to GnRH. Experiment 2 was a 2x2 factorial with ovariectomy (time = 0 hr) and NaPen as the main effects. One group of ovariectomized (n = 6) and one group of sham ovariectomized (n = 6) ewes were anesthetized only during surgery, while a group of ovariectomized (n = 7) and a group of sham ovariectomized (n = 6) ewes were kept at a surgical plane of anesthesia until 10 hr after surgery. Patterns of LH and FSH were compared in jugular blood collected hourly from 0 hr until 10 hr after surgery and in samples collected at 24 hr intervals from -24 to +72 hr of surgery. After ovariectomy, LH increased (P<.001) hourly and daily, but anesthesia suppressed (hourly, <.001 and daily, P<.005) these increases, which resulted in an interaction (hourly, P<.001 and daily, P<.01) of ovariectomy and anesthesia. FSH after ovariectomy increased hourly and daily (hourly, P<.02 and daily, P<.001), but the effect of anesthesia and interaction of ovariectomy and anesthesia were not significant. Because NaPen did not alter secretion of LH or FSH after exogenous GnRH in experiment 1 while it blocked the postovariectomy increase in LH but not FSH in experiment 2, we concluded that the postovariectomy increase in LH resulted from increased hypothalamic secretion of GnRH. The mechanisms responsible for the postovariectomy increase in FSH secretion are not identical to those for LH. The mechanisms that control the postovariectomy secretion of FSH might involve factors that are not suppressible by NaPen or, alternatively, the differences in LH and FSH release after ovariectomy might reflect the removal of ovarian factors that suppress FSH but not LH secretion in intact ewes.     

Gonadotropin releasing hormone-induced secretion of luteinizing hormone during the milk-ejection reflex in the postpartum beef cow

A study was conducted to determine the effect of the milk-ejection reflex on exogenous gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced release of luteinizing hormone (LH) after short-term calf removal. Twenty-four postpartum multiparous beef cows were assigned randomly to groups arranged in a 2(3) factorial arrangement. Factors consisted of two levels of suckling [suckled (S) or nonsuckled (NS)], treatment with GnRH [saline (C) or 200 micrograms GnRH] and days postpartum (d 1 and 14). Dams were isolated from their calves for 4 h on d 1 and 14 postpartum. At the end of 4 h dams were reunited with their calves in S + C and S + GnRH groups, while dams of calves in NS + C and NS + GnRH groups remained separated an additional 2 h. Cows were injected iv with saline or GnRH following the 4-h isolation period, 5 min after calves had begun suckling or nuzzling the udder. Sera from jugular blood samples collected 15 min prior to the end of the 4-h isolation period, immediately prior to injection (0 h) and at 15 min intervals thereafter for 120 min were analyzed for LH. Serum concentrations of LH in control cows did not differ due to suckling or stage of the postpartum period and averaged 2.3 +/- .1 ng/ml. Pituitary response to GnRH was determined by computing the rate of LH release. Rate of LH release (ng LH.ml-1.min-1) in response to GnRH on d 14 was greater (P less than .001) than on d 1 in both suckled and nonsuckled groups (S + GnRH, 37.1 +/- 3.9 vs 18.3 +/- 5.0; NS + GnRH, 34.7 +/- 5.9 vs 14.5 +/- 1.1). However, GnRH-induced release of LH did not differ between suckled and nonsuckled cows on either d 1 or 14 postpartum. These data indicate that response of the bovine pituitary to GnRH during the postpartum period is not influenced by the act of suckling but is enhanced with time after parturition.     

Suppressive action of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and luteinizing hormone on function of the developing ovine corpus luteum

Experiments were conducted to examine the effects of exogenous GnRH and LH on serum concentrations of progesterone (P4) in the ewe. Ewes in Exp. 1 and 2 were laparotomized on d 2 of an estrous cycle and ewes with corpora lutea (CL) in both ovaries were unilaterally ovariectomized. Ewes with CL in one ovary only were not ovariectomized. While they were anesthetized, ewes (n = 5) were injected with 25 micrograms GnRH (Exp. 1) or 50 ng GnRH (Exp. 2) into the artery supplying the ovary bearing the CL. Control ewes (n = 5 in each experiment) were injected similarly with saline. In Exp. 3, six ewes were injected i.v. (jugular) on d 2 with 100 micrograms oLH (t = 0) and 50 micrograms oLH at 15, 30 and 45 min; six control ewes were injected similarly with saline. Jugular blood was collected from all ewes at frequent intervals after treatment for LH analysis and on alternate days of the cycle through d 10 or 11 for P4 analysis. Treatment with 25 micrograms GnRH increased serum concentrations of LH at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min postinjection (P less than .001) and reduced serum concentrations of P4 on d 7 through 11 (treatment x day interaction; P less than .05). Injection with 50 ng GnRH caused a slight increase in serum concentrations of LH at 15 min but had no effect on serum concentrations of P4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Steroid hormone and luteinizing hormone concentrations in the anestrous sow.

This investigation characterized serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol-17 beta (E2), progesterone (P4) and cortisol (C) in anestrous sows. Twenty-two sows that had not returned to estrus within 45 days after weaning (anestrous sows), and ten sows that had returned to estrus within seven days following weaning (cyclic sows) were nonsurgically fitted with indwelling jugular vein cannulae. Blood samples were collected at 6 h intervals for seven days and at 15 min intervals for 8 h on the fifth day after cannulation. Serum LH concentrations were determined in all samples, while C, E2 and P4 levels were quantitated in serum collected at 6 h intervals. Serum P4 concentrations in anestrous sows were consistently less than 0.5 ng/mL, and E2 levels ranged from 10 to 19 pg/mL. Concentrations of LH remained less than 1.0 ng/mL in anestrous sows, whereas a preovulatory LH surge was observed in five of ten cyclic sows. There was a circadian rhythm in mean C levels with C peaks occurring at 0600 or 2400 h and nadir levels observed at 1200 and 1800 h. Few differences in C levels were detected between anestrous and cyclic sows. It was evident that anestrous sows did not exhibit cyclic or predictable variations in steroid hormone concentrations. Unfortunately, the results of this study failed to elucidate the endocrine pathogenesis of the anestrous sow.