Puroindoline Genotype of the U.S. National Institute of Standards & Technology Reference Material 8441, Wheat Hardness

Grain hardness (kernel texture) is of central importance in the quality and utilization of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain. Two major classes, soft and hard, are delineated in commerce and in the Official U.S. Standards for Grain. However, measures of grain hardness are empirical and require reference materials for instrument standardization. For AACC Approved Methods employing near‐infrared reflectance (NIR) and the Single Kernel Characterization System (39‐70A and 55‐31, respectively), such reference materials were prepared by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Federal Grain Inspection Service. The material was comprised of genetically pure commercial grain lots of five soft and five hard wheat cultivars and was made available through the National Institute of Standards and Technology (SRM 8441, Wheat Hardness). However, since their establishment, the molecular‐genetic basis of wheat grain hardness has been shown to result from puroindoline a and b. Consequently, we sought to define the puroindoline genotype of these 10 wheat cultivars and more fully characterize their kernel texture through Particle Size Index (PSI, Method 55‐30) and Quadrumat flour milling. NIR, SKCS, and Quadrumat break flour yield grouped the hard and soft cultivars into discrete texture classes; PSI did not separate completely the two classes. Although all four of these methods of texture measurement were highly intercorrelated, each was variably influenced by some minor, secondary factors. Among the hard wheats, the two hard red spring wheat cultivars that possess the Pina‐D1b (a‐null) hardness allele were harder than the hard red winter wheat cultivars that possess the Pinb‐D1b allele based on NIR, PSI, and break flour yield. Among the soft wheat samples, SKCS grouped the Eastern soft red winter cultivars separate from the Western soft white. A more complete understanding of texture‐related properties of these and future wheat samples is vital to the use and calibration of kernel texture‐measuring instruments.     

Relationship Between Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Grain Hardness and Wet‐Milling Quality

Grain hardness variation has large effects on many different end‐use properties of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Hardness (Ha) locus consisting of the Puroindoline a and b genes (Pina and Pinb) controls the majority of grain hardness variation. Starch production is a growing end‐use of wheat. The objective of this study was to estimate the differences in starch yield due to natural and transgenically conditioned grain hardness differences. To accomplish this goal, a small‐scale wet‐milling protocol was used to characterize the wet‐milling properties of two independent groups of isogenic materials varying in grain hardness and in Pin expression level. The first group of lines consisted of hard/soft near‐isogenic lines created in cultivars Falcon or Gamenya in which lines carried either the Pina‐D1a (functional) or the Pina‐D1b (null) alleles of Pina. The second group of lines consisted of Pina, Pinb, or Pina and Pinb overexpressing lines created in Hi‐Line, a hard red spring wheat. Soft near‐isogenic lines had higher starch extractability than the hard Pina null counterparts. This difference in starch extractability was more pronounced between Hi‐Line and its transgenic isolines, with highest levels of extractable starch observed in the transgenic isoline with intermediate grain texture. The results demonstrate that the Ha locus and puroindoline expression are both linked to wet‐milling starch yield and that selection for increased Ha function increases starch yield through the enhanced separation of starch granules and the protein matrix during wet milling.     

A Study of Puroindoline b Gene Involvement in the Milling Behavior of Hard‐Type Common Wheats

Differences in milling behavior among hard‐type common wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars are well known to millers. Among them, the French cultivar Soissons, which contains the Pinb‐D1d allelic form of the puroindoline b gene, is particularly distinguished for its high milling value. Near‐isogenic lines (NILs) differing by the allelic forms of the puroindoline b gene, Pinb‐D1d or Pinb‐D1b (one of the most frequent alleles found in the European wheat population), were constructed. Grain characteristics obtained after wheat cultivation in distinct environmental conditions were compared between NILs and the cultivar Soissons, as was their fractionation behavior. Results showed that NILs containing the Pinb‐D1d allele displayed lower values of grain hardness and vitreousness than did the corresponding lines containing the Pinb‐D1b allelic form under the same cultivation conditions. Both genetic background and environmental conditions appeared to affect grain texture. Measured single‐kernel characterization system hardness index values of the samples under study were found to be correlated with the vitreousness values. Studies of the milling behavior helped to point out that grain vitreousness is an important factor acting on endosperm breakage ability, whatever the genetic background of the wheat. Our results also demonstrated that, at similar levels of vitreousness, the endosperm of Soissons could more easily be reduced than that of other wheat lines.     

Novel Ha Locus,Pina‐D1c/Pinb‐D1h,Affects Soft White Spring Wheat Milling and Baking

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain hardness is controlled by the Hardness locus on chromosome 5D which consists of the linked genes Puroindoline a and b (Pina and Pinb, respectively). The Ha locus haplotype, Pina‐D1a/Pinb‐D1a, is found in all soft hexaploid wheats. While Pin diversity is low among soft wheats, several novel Ha haplotypes were reported among synthetic hexaploid wheats created using the D genome donor, Aegilops tauschii. One haplotype, Pina‐D1c/Pinb‐D1h, confers a soft phenotype with increased grain hardness over Pina‐D1a/Pinb‐D1a wheats. Here, the Pina‐D1c/Pinb‐D1h haplotype was backcrossed into the soft white spring wheat cultivars ‘Vanna’ and ‘Alpowa’. Then the effect of the two haplotypes on soft wheat milling and baking quality was compared. The effects of the Pina‐D1c/Pinb‐D1h Ha locus haplotype were similar in both the Vanna and Alpowa backgrounds. The Pina‐D1c/Pinb‐D1h lines had significantly more large and fewer small flour particles in both backgrounds and 1.51% higher flour yield in the Alpowa background. The Pina‐D1c/Pinb‐D1h haplotype group was not associated with any consistent differences in solvent retention capacities or sugar snap cookie quality parameters. The results indicate that the Pina‐D1c/Pinb‐D1h haplotype could be used to modify soft wheat milling properties without substantial effects on baking quality.     

Mutagenesis‐Derived Puroindoline Alleles in Triticum aestivum and Their Impacts on Milling and Bread Quality

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) end‐product quality is impacted by grain hardness, which is determined by the Hardness locus consisting of the Puroindoline a and Puroindoline b genes, Pina and Pinb, respectively. Hard wheats commonly contain just one of two Pin mutations. We previously demonstrated the creation and preliminary hardness testing of 46 Pin missense alleles. In this study we examine the degree that individual Pin missense alleles confer unique milling and bread quality traits. Three Pina (PINA‐R103K, ‐G47S, and ‐P35S) and four Pinb (PINB‐D34N, ‐T38I, ‐G46D, and ‐E51K) missense alleles were chosen because they impart variable grain hardness levels, with one allele conferring soft seed texture, three conferring intermediate hardness (single‐kernel characterization system [SKCS] hardness approximately 50), and three conferring hard grain texture (SKCS hardness greater than 60). All but two of the alleles (PINA‐R103K and PINA‐G47S) resulted in higher total flour yield when compared with wild‐type controls. All hard and intermediate hardness alleles had decreased break flour yield, but intermediate hardness allele PINA‐P35S had higher break flour yield than common hard allele Pinb‐D1b. Intermediate and hard alleles resulted in increased abundance of larger and reduced levels of smaller flour particles. None of the missense alleles differed from their controls for loaf volume. The seven selected Pin alleles imparted defined levels of grain hardness and milling properties not previously available that may prove useful in wheat improvement.     

Development of SNP assays for genotyping the puroindoline b gene for grain hardness in wheat using pyrosequencing

Grain hardness is one of the most important quality characteristics of cultivated bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and has been reported to result from either a failure to express puroindoline a (Pina) or single-nucleotide mutations in puroindoline b (Pinb). Up to now, seven alleles from Pinb-D1a to Pinb-D1g were identified in bread wheat. Compared to the DNA coding region of Pinb-D1a (allele for softness), six single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected in six alleles for Pinb-D1. In this study, we used pyrosequencing technology to develop two SNP assays for identification of the seven Pinb alleles and characterized SNP variations in the Pinb of 493 European wheat varieties. Of the three hardness alleles Pinb-D1b, Pinb-D1c, and Pinb-D1d detected in this study, Pinb-D1b was the most predominant hardness allele in European hard wheats. The hardness genotypes of partial German wheat varieties available confirmed the reliability and validation of the SNP assays developed for the Pinb locus. Therefore, pyrosequencing technology offers an efficient, precise, and reliable concept for high-throughout genotyping to assist selection of grain hardness genes in wheat quality breeding programs.     

Characterization of Genes Encoding Wheat Grain Hardness from Chinese Cultivar GaoCheng 8901

The puroindoline‐b (Pinb‐D1) gene from Chinese hard wheat cultivar GaoCheng 8901 (Triticum aestivum L.) was obtained using two pairs of primers designed based on the known Pinb‐D1 gene sequence and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. The PCR amplification was made using the genomic DNA of the wheat as a template and the specific fragment ≈450 bp in size was screened. The results indicated that the Pinb‐D1 gene in GaoCheng 8901 shared 99.78% and 99.32% homology in nucleotide acid sequence and amino acid sequence, respectively, compared with the Pinb‐D1 gene from hard wheat cultivars Wanser and Cheyenne. A new mutation in this Pinb‐D1 gene, different from the six known mutations in the Pinb‐D1 gene, was characterized with a change of a lysine to glutamic acid at position 45 in its protein sequence. This mutation, designated as Pinb‐D1l in this study, might contribute to the formation of grain hardness in GaoCheng 8901. The characterization of Pinb‐D1 gene would be helpful in manipulating grain hardness of wheat through genetic engineering.     

Comparison of Quality‐Related Alleles Among Australian and North American Wheat Classes Exported to Japan

Grain hardness, amylose content, and glutenin subunit composition are critical determinants for end‐use properties of wheat. To improve the end‐use properties of domestic wheats, we studied these traits between the Australian and North American wheat classes exported to Japan in 2009 and 2011 by analyzing the corresponding alleles. Most hard classes had Pina‐D1b or Pinb‐D1b. A partial waxy allele (Wx‐B1b) was found in all Australian Standard White (ASW) seeds in 2009 and two‐thirds of ASW seeds in 2011. All or most American hard wheat seeds had Glu‐D1d. Most U.S. Western White (WW) seeds had a null allele (Glu‐A1c) or alleles that lacked one of the two Glu‐B1 subunits. Most hard red winter (HRW) seeds had Glu‐B3b or Glu‐B3g. Quality characteristics of these classes seemed to be consistent with these results. In addition, we also found new Glu‐1 and Glu‐3 alleles in HRW and WW. These results suggested that although there are variations in its allelic composition from year to year, each class has unique quality‐related alleles corresponding to its end use. We proposed two matrices for classification of starch properties on the basis of Pin and Wx allelic combinations and for classification of gluten strength on the basis of glutenin allelic combinations.     

Creation and Characterization of a Double Null Puroindoline Genotype in Spring Wheat

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain hardness is controlled by the Ha locus, which is composed of two closely linked genes, Puroindoline a (Pina ) and Puroindoline b (Pinb ). Hard grain results from mutations in either of the Pin genes. Previous results have shown that the Pina‐D1b (Pina null) allele has harder grain than other naturally occurring Pin alleles. Our goal was to create, identify, and characterize a double null Pin genotype by identifying a Pinb null mutation in a variety carrying the Pina‐D1l null allele. Seeds of Fortuna, which has a premature stop codon in Pina , were treated with ethyl methanesulfonate. Two premature stop codon mutations were identified in Pinb using direct sequencing. The double null Pin haplotype was characterized after backcrossing to the parent variety Fortuna to create Pina null populations segregating for the presence of Pinb . The double null group was 6 units harder than the single null with no difference in other kernel characteristics. The milling characteristics differed between the two classes; the double null class had less break flour with a greater fraction of large and a smaller fraction of small flour particles compared with the single null class. Neither water absorption nor loaf volume was impacted by the change in grain hardness; however, Na₂CO₃ tests indicated greater starch damage in the double nulls. The double null Pin genotype may find a niche in hard wheat products for which flours with larger particle size are desired.     

Molecular characterization and diversity of puroindoline b-2 variants in cultivated and wild diploid wheat

Cloning and phylogenetic analysis of puroindoline b-2 variants in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and its relatives would advance the understanding of the genetic diversity and evolution of puroindoline b-2 gene in common wheat and its related species. In the present study, common wheat (AABBDD) and four related species, including T. urartu (A^uA^u), Aegilops speltoides (SS), Ae. tauschii (DD), and T. turgidum (AABB) were sampled for the presence of novel alleles at Pinb2v-A1, Pinb2v-B1/Pinb2v-S1 and Pinb2v-D1 loci corresponding to common wheat puroindoline b-2 variants. Nine new alleles were identified at these loci, designated Pinb2v-A1a through Pinb2v-A1c, Pinb2v-S1a through Pinb2v-S1e, and Pinb2v-D1a. Alignment of puroindoline variants or alleles from common wheat and its relatives indicated that all alleles in diploid wheats are attributed to single nucleotide substitution when compared with puroindoline b-2 variants in polyploids. Deduced amino acid sequences showed that all three alleles at Pinb2v-A1 locus and four alleles (Pinb2v-S1a, Pinb2v-S1b, Pinb2v-S1c and Pinb2v-S1e) at the Pinb2v-S1 locus could not be normally translated due to the presence of premature stop codons, whereas Pinb2v-D1a at the Pinb2v-D1 locus and Pinb2v-S1d at the Pinb2v-S1 locus could be normally translated, possibly suggesting that the puroindoline b-2 variant in Ae. tauschii was more highly conserved than those in T. urartu and Ae. speltoides. Meanwhile, puroindoline b-2 variant could be normally translated in all of the durum and common wheat cultivars surveyed. None of the puroindoline b-2 alleles previously identified in durum and common wheat were found in the diploid genome donors examined here, even though a greater diversity of alleles were found in diploid wheat compared to polyploid wheat. These results likely reflect the evolutionary history of tetraploid and hexaploid wheats, although it may be that puroindoline b-2 variant alleles have been selected for stability and functionality in common and durum wheat. This study provides a survey of puroindoline b-2 variants in common wheat and its relatives, and provides useful information for understanding the genetic diversity of puroindoline-like genes and their duplication events in wheat.     

Effects of Allelic Variations in Wx‐1, Glu‐D1, Glu‐B3, and Pinb‐D1 Loci on Flour Characteristics and White Salted Noodle‐Making Quality of Wheat Flour

Doubled haploid wheat lines developed from a cross between a hard white winter wheat variety of normal starch endosperm and a waxy wheat variety were used to determine the effects of allelic variation in Wx‐1, Glu‐D1, Glu‐B3, and Pinb‐D1 loci on physiochemical properties of flour, noodle dough properties, and textural quality of cooked noodles. Milling yield, damaged starch content, protein content, and SDS sedimentation volume of flour were influenced the most by allelic composition of Pinb‐D1 loci, less by Wx‐1 loci, and least by Glu‐B3. Wheat lines carrying Pinb‐D1b or Glu‐B3h alleles exhibited higher milling yield and damaged starch content of flour than those with Pinb‐D1a and Glu‐B3d alleles. Wheat lines carrying the Pinb‐D1b allele were higher in protein content and SDS sedimentation volume than those carrying Pinb‐D1a. Mixograph water absorption was largely influenced by allelic composition of Wx‐1 loci, whereas mixograph mixing time and mixing tolerance were predominantly determined by allelic composition of Glu‐D1 loci. Amylose content and pasting properties of starch were mainly determined by allelic composition of Wx‐1 loci with little influence by allelic compositions of Glu‐D1, Glu‐B3, and Pinb‐D1 loci. Allelic composition of Wx‐1 loci contributed 53.4% of the variation in optimum water absorption of noodle dough and 26.7% of the variation in thickness of the noodle dough sheet. The variation of 7.8% in optimum water absorption of noodle dough was contributed by the allelic composition of Pinb‐D1 loci. Allelic composition of Wx‐1 loci was responsible for 73.2, 74.4, and 59.6% in the variation of hardness, springiness, and cohesiveness of cooked noodles, respectively. Cohesiveness of cooked noodles was also influenced by the allelic compositions of Glu‐B3 and Pinb‐D1 loci to a smaller extent.     

Effect of Variation in Amylose Content and Puroindoline Composition on Bread Quality in a Hard Spring Wheat Population

Milling and breadbaking quality of hard‐textured wheat may be influenced by alternative alleles at the Wx loci controlling percent amylose in the endosperm, and the puroindoline (pin) loci controlling grain hardness. For this experiment, we developed recombinant inbred lines (RIL) from a cross between Choteau spring wheat cultivar and experimental line MTHW9904. Choteau has the PinB‐D1b mutation conferring grain hardness and the Wx‐B1a allele at the Wx‐B1 locus conferring wild‐type amylose content. MTHW9904 has the PinA‐D1b allele conferring grain hardness and the Wx‐B1b allele conferring lower amylose content, causing a partial waxy phenotype. RIL with the PinB‐D1b mutation (n = 49) had significantly softer kernels, higher break flour yield, and higher loaf volume than lines with the PinA‐D1b mutation (n = 38). Lines with partial waxy phenotype due to Wx‐B1b (n = 43) had significantly lower kernel weight, lower amylose content, and higher flour swelling power than lines with wild‐type starch due to Wx‐B1a (n = 51). These results provide additional evidence for the positive effect of PinB‐D1b on bread quality in hard wheats, while genotype at Wx‐B1 was generally neutral for bread quality in this population. Interactions between the Pin and Wx loci were minimal.     

Protein Profile and Molecular Markers Related to the Baking Quality of Brazilian Wheat Cultivars

To carry out wheat breeding programs, proteins were identified and quantified (through sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [SDS‐PAGE] and size‐exclusion high‐performance liquid chromatography [SE‐HPLC]) and six allele‐specific markers were tested on 45 Brazilian cultivars. A microscale baking test was applied to associate analytical and genetic responses with baking quality. The results suggested a prevalence of the subunits 2* and 1 in chromosome 1A; 7+8, 7+9, and 17+18 in 1B; and 5+10 in 1D; absence of 1BL/1RS translocation in 62.2% of the genotypes; and presence of Pinb‐D1b and Glu‐A3d in 8.9% of the genotypes. The average SE‐HPLC values were 37.50 and 45.42% for polymeric protein in total protein (PPP) and unextractable polymeric protein (UPP), respectively, and 1.29 for the gliadin‐to‐glutenin (GLI/GLU) ratio, with significant variation among the genotypes (P ≤ 0.05). The baking test also showed a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) between the cultivars under the same conditions. The cultivars without the 1BL/1RS translocation with rye also showed better results for UPP, PPP, and GLI/GLU in relation to those possessing translocation. These results corroborate for selection of HMW subunits 5+10, cultivars without translocation with rye, with high UPP values and a balanced GLI/GLU ratio (around 1.0) with the objective of obtaining greater wheat baking quality.     

Specific Glu‐D1ƒ Allele Frequency of Japanese Common Wheat Compared with Distribution of Glu‐1 Alleles in Chinese Wheat

The quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain favored in breadmaking is strongly affected by components of seed storage protein, particularly high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW‐GS). The HMW‐GS 2.2 controlled by the Glu‐D1ƒ allele is frequently found in Japanese cultivars and landraces. In the investigation into the factors affecting the distribution of the allele, the available data on HMW‐GS of common wheats from Japan were analyzed and compared with the data for intensity of winter habit and wheat flour hardness. We show that the main factors affecting the Glu‐D1ƒ allele frequency in Japanese wheat were the intensity of natural selection for winter habit and artificial selection for flour hardness. According to a study of the worldwide distribution of Glu‐1 alleles, the Glu‐D1ƒ allele is rare. However, Glu‐D1ƒ allele was the most common Japanese wheat seed storage protein allele. It is well known that Chinese wheat contributed to Japanese landraces, and Japanese landraces contributed to modern cultivars from Japan. However, common Japanese and Chinese wheats differ in the frequencies of Glu‐D1ƒ allele. These results may be explained either by the founder effect or by a selective bottleneck in Japanese common wheat genetic resources.     

Influence of Puroindolines A and B Individually and in Combination on Wheat Milling and Bread Traits

Endosperm texture in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is determined by the Pina and Pinb genes located within the Hardness (Ha) locus on chromosome 5D. We have previously shown that Pina and Pinb can act alone to produce intermediate-textured grain or act together to produce soft grain. The objective here was to isolate the role of PINA and PINB individually and in combination on milling and bread traits by analyzing F₃ recombinant lines created by crosses between PINA and PINB null cultivars with Pina-D1a and Pinb-D1a overexpressing transgenic lines. Homozygous lines that contained either the Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a (Pina null) or Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1e (Pinb null) Ha locus with or lacking transgenically added Pina or Pinb were analyzed for milling and bread traits. Addition of Pina-D1a to Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a and addition of Pinb-D1a to Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1e Ha locus genotypes gave soft grain with lower flour yield, flour ash, and a higher proportion of small flour particles. Addition of Pinb-D1a produced greater negative effects on loaf volume than addition of Pina-D1a. Grain hardness, flour protein, flour ash, and mixograph water absorption were positively correlated, which is indicative of the complex phenotype conditioned by PINs. The results demonstrate that PIN overexpression leads to a reduction in grain hardness and reduced flour yield, flour ash, and flour particle size. PIN expression also results in reduced loaf volume and flour water absorption.     

Compressive Strength of Wheat Endosperm: Comparison of Endosperm Bricks to the Single Kernel Characterization System

The three major classes of endosperm texture (grain hardness) of soft and hard common, and durum wheat represent and define one of the leading determinants of the milling and end‐use quality of wheat. Although these three genetic classes are directly related to the Hardness locus and puroindoline gene function, much less is known about the kernel‐to‐kernel variation within pure varietal grain lots. Measurement of this variation is of considerable interest. The objective of this research was to compare kernel texture as determined by compression failure testing using endosperm bricks with results of whole‐kernel hardness obtained with the Single Kernel Characterization System 4100 hardness index (SKCS HI). In general terms, the variation obtained with the SKCS HI was of similar magnitude to that obtained using failure strain and failure energy of endosperm brick compression. Objective comparisons included frequency distribution plots, normalized frequency distribution plots, ANOVA model R², and coefficients of variation. Results indicated that compression testing and SKCS HI similarly captured the main features of texture classes but also reflected notable differences in texture properties among and within soft, hard, and durum classes. Neither brick compression testing nor the SKCS HI may be reasonably expected to correctly classify all individual kernels as to genetic texture class. However, modest improvements in correct classification rate or, more importantly, better classification related to end‐use quality may still be achievable.     

Effects on Soft Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Quality of Increased Puroindoline Dosage

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain hardness affects many end‐product quality traits and is controlled primarily by the Hardness (Ha) locus that contains the Puroindoline a and b genes (Pina and Pinb, respectively). All soft hexaploid wheats carry the same Pin alleles, and hard wheats carry a mutation in Pina or Pinb. Here we test the heritability and milling and flour quality effects of increased Pin dosage in soft wheat. Previous experiments have suggested that grain softness can be enhanced by increasing Ha locus dosage through chromosome substitutions. Segregation data from a cross of cultivar Chinese Spring substitution lines with six doses of the Ha locus to the locally adapted soft wheat cultivar Vanna indicate that the substituted B genome Ha locus was not transmitted and that the A genome Ha locus was transmitted normally. Genotypes with the added Pins on the A genome produced seeds that were 7.4 hardness units softer. These softer double Ha genotypes were lower in flour yields, but produced flour with lower ash content, reduced starch damage, and smaller mean particle size. Soft wheats with increased Ha dosage may be useful in improving soft wheat quality through its effects on particle size and starch damage.     

Impact of Null Polyphenol Oxidase Alleles on White Salted Noodles

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) causes Asian noodles to lose their bright color over time. Null Ppo‐A1 and Ppo‐D1 alleles are available that confer very low kernel PPO levels. Our goal was to characterize the effect of the Ppo‐A1i and Ppo‐D1f null alleles on the color and texture profile of white salted noodles. A white‐seeded spring wheat carrying Ppo‐A1i/Ppo‐A2d and Ppo‐D1f was crossed to a hard white‐seeded isoline of Choteau spring wheat with Ppo‐A1b/Ppo‐A2a and Ppo‐D1b and to a hard white‐seeded isoline of Vida spring wheat with Ppo‐A1a/Ppo‐A2b and Ppo‐D1b. Resultant lines homozygous for the null‐Ppo alleles or for the alternate parent Ppo alleles were selected and grown in replicated trials. The null‐Ppo alleles had no detrimental effects on kernel or flour traits. Noodles prepared from straight‐grade or whole wheat flour from the null‐Ppo allele class were less cohesive and softer than noodles from the alternate parent Ppo allele class for the White Choteau but not the White Vida population. Noodles prepared from straight‐grade and whole wheat flour from the null‐Ppo class were brighter, more red, and more yellow after 24 h and showed less change in L* with time than noodles prepared from the alternate parent Ppo class. The relative difference between the two genotype classes for change in L* with time (0–24 h) exceeded 3.5 L* for noodles from both types of flour, which was an improvement over existing low‐Ppo alleles. Incorporating the null‐Ppo alleles into wheat varieties could improve the color profile of Asian noodles.     

Influence of Soft Kernel Texture on the Flour,Water Absorption,Rheology, and Baking Quality of Durum Wheat

Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum ) production worldwide is substantially less than that of common wheat (T. aestivum ). Durum kernels are extremely hard; thus, most durum wheat is milled into semolina, which has limited utilization. Soft kernel durum wheat was created by introgression of the puroindoline genes via homoeologous recombination. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of the puroindoline genes and soft kernel texture on flour, water absorption, rheology, and baking quality of durum wheat. Soft Svevo and Soft Alzada, back‐cross derivatives of the durum varieties Svevo and Alzada, were compared with Svevo, a hard durum wheat, Xerpha, a soft white winter wheat, and Expresso, a hard red spring wheat. Soft Svevo and Soft Alzada exhibited soft kernel texture; low water, sodium carbonate, and sucrose solvent retention capacities (SRCs); and reduced dough water absorptions similar to soft wheat. These results indicate a pronounced effect of the puroindolines. Conversely, SDS flour sedimentation volume and lactic acid SRC of the soft durum samples were more similar to the Svevo hard durum and Expresso samples, indicating much less effect of kernel softness on protein strength measurements. Alveograph results were influenced by the inherent differences in water absorption properties of the different flours and their genetic background (e.g., W and P were markedly reduced in the Soft Svevo samples compared with Svevo, whereas the puroindolines appeared to have little effect on L ). However, Soft Svevo and Soft Alzada differed markedly for W and L . Soft durum samples produced bread loaf volumes between the soft and hard common wheat samples but larger sugar‐snap cookie diameters than all comparison samples. The soft durum varieties exhibited new and unique flour and baking attributes as well as retaining the color and protein characteristics of their durum parents.     

Effect of Soft Kernel Texture on the Milling Properties of Soft Durum Wheat

Worldwide, nearly 20 times more common wheat (Triticum aestivum) is produced than durum wheat (T. turgidum subsp. durum). Durum wheat is predominately milled into coarse semolina owing to the extreme hardness of the kernels. Semolina, lacking the versatility of traditional flour, is used primarily in the production of pasta. The puroindoline genes, responsible for kernel softness in wheat, have been introduced into durum via homoeologous recombination. The objective of this study was to determine what impact the introgression of the puroindoline genes, and subsequent expression of the soft kernel phenotype, had on the milling properties and flour characteristics of durum wheat. Three grain lots of Soft Svevo and one of Soft Alzada, two soft‐kernel back‐cross derived durum varieties, were milled into flour on the modified Quadrumat Senior laboratory mill at 13, 14, and 16% temper levels. Samples of Svevo (a durum wheat and recurrent parent of Soft Svevo), Xerpha (a soft white winter wheat), and Expresso (a hard red spring wheat) were included as comparisons. Soft Svevo and Soft Alzada exhibited dramatically lower single‐kernel characterization system kernel hardness than the other samples. Soft Svevo and Soft Alzada had high break flour yields, similar to the common wheat samples, especially the soft hexaploid wheat, and markedly greater than the durum samples. Overall, Soft Svevo and Soft Alzada exhibited milling properties and flour quality comparable, if not superior, to those of common wheat.