An Anaplasma centrale DNA probe that differentiates between Anaplasma ovis and Anaplasma marginale DNA

An Anaplasma centrale genomic library was constructed in pUC13. Two clones pAC5 and pAC137 hybridising to A. centrale and A. marginale DNA were isolated from this library. One of these, pAC5, also hybridised to DNA from A. ovis. The total insert of pAC5 was subcloned into pBR322. This subclone, pAC5-12, could detect 1 ng A. centrale, 0.5 ng A. marginale and 3.9 ng A. ovis DNA. The hybridisation pattern obtained with pAC5-12 on digests of A. centrale, A. marginale and A. ovis DNA suggests that this probe detects EcoR1 and Hind111-polymorphisms. Probe pAC5-12 could detect A. ovis DNA in 36% of blood samples tested compared to the 33% detectability obtained with microscopy.     

DNA probes for the detection of Anaplasma centrale and Anaplasma marginale

Anaplasmosis can be diagnosed either by immunological techniques or by direct microscopic examination of blood smears. Both methods are time-consuming and labour intensive. The use of DNA probes in an hybridization assay may simplify the diagnosis of anaplasmosis in cattle and sheep. A genomic DNA library of Anaplasma centrale was constructed in an expression vector and screened to detect clones containing A. centrale DNA. Four probes which hybridized to A. centrale and Anaplasma marginale DNA were isolated. One of these (AC-1) hybridized only to A. centrale DNA, whereas AC-2, AC-3 and AC-4 could detect DNA from both A. centrale and A. marginale. Probes AC-1 and AC-2 could detect 127 ng and 8 ng DNA respectively, while AC-3 and AC-4 detected 64 ng A. centrale DNA.     

Analysis of protein compositions and surface protein epitopes of Anaplasma centrale and Anaplasma marginale.

Protein composition was compared and epitopes were analyzed among the isolates of Anaplasma centrale and A. marginale by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, immunoblotting using bovine antisera and monoclonal antibodies, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Common and unique proteins were found among the isolates. All isolates tested had a major surface protein with an apparent molecular weight of 38 to 40 kilodalton which had slight molecular size variations between species. This protein was also a dominant immunogen to the host. At least two species-common epitopes, one of which might contain carbohydrate(s), were present on the major surface protein. One species-specific epitope was identified on the major surface protein of A. marginale isolates.     

利用套式PCR检测牛羊乏质体

为同时检测和鉴定牛边缘乏质体、中央乏质体及绵羊乏质体,根据这3种病原体的msp4基因核苷酸序列,自行设计、合成了针对3种乏质体的2对通用引物,及分别针对三者的特异引物,通过PCR条件优化,建立了检测乏质体及分别鉴定3种乏质体的套式PCR方法,并与OIE推荐的msp5半套式PCR比较.结果显示:该方法对牛巴贝斯虫、双芽巴贝斯虫、羊莫氏巴贝斯虫、山羊泰勒虫、温氏附红细胞体、东方巴贝斯虫、刚地弓形虫、伊氏锥虫均未扩增出特异性片段.套式PCR检测乏质体DNA量为0.2 pg(相当于6个感染红细胞).检测l 119份来自6个不同地区的奶牛、肉牛、水牛及羊的临床样品,阳性106份,经鉴定边缘乏质体46份,中央乏质体15份,绵羊乏质体35份,混合感染中央乏质体和绵羊乏质体4份,混合感染边缘乏质体和绵羊乏质体3份,混合感染边缘乏质体和中央乏质体3份.首次在分子生物学水平证明中央乏质体存在于中国.同时,证明牛可以混合感染边缘乏质体和中央乏质体或绵羊乏质体,以及混合感染中央乏质体和绵羊乏质体.上述848份样品用OIE推荐的msp5半套式PCR同时检测,两者符合率为98.5％(835/848).检测结果表明,msp4套式PCR特异、敏感,可用于边缘乏质体、中央乏质体、绵羊乏质体的检测和鉴定.     

Frozen and fresh Anaplasma centrale vaccines in the protection of cattle against Anaplasma marginale infection

The immunity induced by frozen and fresh Anaplasma centrale vaccines against anaplasmosis caused by A. marginale was tested in 12-month old Friesian steers. A. centrale parasitaemia occurred in all cattle inoculated with both types of vaccine. The average maximal decrease in PCV for the frozen and fresh vaccines was 41.0 and 40.3% respectively. All cattle recovered spontaneously. Vaccinated and control steers of the same age were challenged six months later with doses of 10(6), 10(7) or 10(8) A. marginale organisms. Vaccinated cattle showed average maximal A. marginale parasitemia of 1.2-4.0 versus 10.3-12.0% in control cattle. The average maximal decrease in packed cell volume (PCV) was 33.1 and 30.0% for steers vaccinated with frozen or fresh vaccine, respectively, and 57.4% for the non-vaccinated steers. All vaccinated cattle recovered spontaneously from the A. marginale infection while 7 out of 8 control steers required specific treatment. It thus appears that both frozen and fresh A. centrale vaccines are equally capable of inducing partial protection against infection with A. marginale and of preventing severe red blood cell destruction.     

Duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous detection and quantification of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale

Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale are rickettsial pathogens responsible for acute disease and mild infections, respectively, in cattle herds. A duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with probes labeled with different fluorophores was developed for simultaneous detection and quantification of A. marginale and A. centrale DNA in bovine blood samples. The assay was able to detect as few as 10(1) and 10(2) DNA copies for A. marginale and A. centrale, respectively, with optimal specificity and reproducibility. Analysis by real-time and nested PCR carried out on 54 samples previously tested by reverse line blot hybridization showed that the established duplex real-time PCR assay can detect and quantify the 2 Anaplasma spp., even if present simultaneously in the same blood samples. Such an assay could be used in pathogenesis studies on bovine acute anaplasmosis.     

Heterologous antibody responses of calves to Anaplasma centrale and A. marginale

Antigens of Anaplasma centrale, Onderstepoort isolate, and A. marginale, Wacol isolate, were analysed by a Western blotting technique. Sera from A. centrale-infected calves reacted to 41- and 38-kDa antigens in A. centrale and a 41-kDa antigen in A. marginale. Serum collected during the primary reaction from an A. marginale-infected calf reacted only to the 41-kDa antigen of A. marginale; heterologous antibody response to the 41-kDa antigen of A. centrale did occur later during the infection, but remained markedly weaker than the homologous response. The serologic cross-reactivity to this 41-kDa Anaplasma antigen confirms that it is common to the genus and also that it is a heterogeneous complex.     

Concomitant infection of cattle with the vaccine strain Anaplasma marginale ss centrale and field strains of A. marginale

Bovine anaplasmosis, caused by Anaplasma marginale, the intraerythrocytic rickettsia, is controlled by vaccination with live Anaplasma marginale ss centrale (A. centrale), a subspecies of relatively low pathogenicity. We have experimentally demonstrated that an animal primarily infected with A. marginale, or with the related vaccine subspecies A. centrale can be infected with the heterologous subspecies, and carries both bacteria. The co-infection was detected in experimentally cross-infected calves for up to 3 months after the last inoculation with the heterologous subspecies. The occurrence of characteristic cyclic rickettsemia of A. centrale and A. marginale was observed by examination of Giemsa-stained blood smears, or by the presence of specific rickettsial DNA confirmed in PCR assays based on specific msp1a and msp4 for A. marginale, and on specifically designed msp3 and msp4 primers for A. centrale. Sequence analysis of msp4-specific fragments for each subspecies revealed the presence of dual infection in both calves on days 30 and 60 after cross-inoculation with the heterologous Anaplasma subspecies. The experimental cross-infection of calves clearly demonstrated that the concept of "infection exclusion" does not apply to Anaplasma infection in cattle; as there was no infection exclusion of A. marginale in A. centrale-infected cattle, and vice versa. The present results confirmed our previous findings that cattle grazing in an anaplasmosis-endemic field were subject to concomitant infection with both the vaccine A. centrale and the field A. marginale strains.     

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies to Anaplasma centrale and Anaplasma marginale

An enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) was applied to detect antibodies to A. centrale and A. marginale using homologous and heterologous antigens. The assay was compared with the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test, and although a similar degree of sensitivity was obtained, the ELISA test had several advantages. Partially purified Anaplasma initial bodies used for antigen preparations contained negligible amounts of residual erythrocytic material, and did not interfere with the specificity of the ELISA. The antigenic similarity between A. marginale and A. centrale was further substantiated by cross-reactivity obtained with heterologous antigens in both ELISA and IFA tests, and antibodies produced during natural infection with A. marginale were indistinguishable in both tests from those produced following vaccination with A. centrale.     

Molecular conservation of MSP4 and MSP5 in Anaplasma marginale and A. centrale vaccine strain

Anaplasma centrale msp4 and msp5 genes were cloned and sequenced, and the recombinant proteins were expressed. The identity between Anaplasma marginale and A. centrale MSP4 was 83% in the nucleotide sequences and 91.7% in the encoded protein sequences. A. centrale msp5 nucleotide sequences shared 86.8% identity with A. marginale msp5, and there was 92.9% homology between A. centrale and A. marginale encoded amino acids of the MSP5 protein. Southern blots hybridized with probes derived from the msp4 and msp5 central regions indicate that msp4 and msp5 of A. centrale are encoded by single copy genes. Recombinant MSP4 and MSP5 fusion proteins reacted with anti-A. marginale monoclonal antibodies ANAR76A1 and ANAF16C, respectively, demonstrating the conservation of conformation-sensitive B-cell epitopes between A. centrale and A. marginale. These data demonstrate the structural and antigenic conservation of MSP4 and MSP5 in A. centrale and A. marginale. This conservation is consistent with the cross-protective immunity between A. marginale and A. centrale and supports the development of improved vaccines based upon common outer membrane proteins.     

Evaluation of a commercially available ELISA kit for detection of antibodies to Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale in cattle in Australia and Zimbabwe

A newly available competitive inhibition ELISA kit for the serological diagnosis of anaplasmosis was evaluated in Australia and Zimbabwe. In Australia the performance of the test was compared with the card agglutination test (CAT).The assay was evaluated using negative sera collected from Anaplasma-free herds, positive sera from experimentally infected cattle and sera from Anaplasma marginale-endemic herds. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA in Australia were 100 % and 83,3 %, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of the CAT were both 100%. The agreement between the ELISA and CAT in the sera from endemic herds was 86,4 % (kappa = 0,718). The specificity of the ELISA in Zimbabwe was 100%. No meaningful estimate of sensitivity was possible in Zimbabwe because few known positive sera were available for testing, but all eight known positive sera that were available were clearly positive. We conclude that the ELISA is a useful alternative to the CAT for epidemiological studies.The ELISA kits have advantages over the CAT in that the ELISA is more robust and reagents are better standardized, but the kits are expensive.     

Comparison of a competitive inhibition ELISA and the card agglutination test for detection of antibodies to Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale in cattle

OBJECTIVE: To compare a recently developed recombinant MSP-5 competitive inhibition ELISA with a card agglutination test for detection of antibodies to Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma centrale in Australian cattle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ELISA was compared with the card agglutination test using 208 sera from cattle in Anaplasma-free herds, 86 sera from cattle experimentally infected with A marginale or A centrale and 757 sera from cattle in areas endemic for A marginale. RESULTS: The specificity of the ELISA, based on testing 208 sera from cattle in Anaplasma-free areas, was 99.5%, and the sensitivities for detection of antibodies to A marginale and A centrale in sera from the experimentally infected cattle were 98.0% and 100%, respectively. For the same sets of sera, the specificity of the card agglutination test was 98.6% and the sensitivities for detection of antibodies to A marginale and A centrale were 98.0% and 100%, respectively. For the 757 sera collected from cattle in areas endemic for A marginale, the agreement between the ELISA and the card agglutination test depended on the positive threshold selected for the ELISA. The maximum achievable agreement was 91.5% (kappa = 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.66, 0.79). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the competitive inhibition ELISA is a useful alternative to the card agglutination test for detection of A marginale or A centrale infection in cattle. The assay should be particularly useful for epidemiological applications such as prevalence studies and control programs.     

Transformation of Anaplasma marginale

The tick-borne pathogen, Anaplasma marginale, has a complex life cycle involving ruminants and ixodid ticks. It causes bovine anaplasmosis, a disease with significant economic impact on cattle farming worldwide. The obligate intracellular growth requirement of the bacteria poses a challenging obstacle to their genetic manipulation, a problem shared with other prokaryotes in the genera Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, and Rickettsia. Following our successful transformation of the human anaplasmosis agent, A. phagocytophilum, we produced plasmid constructs (a transposon bearing plasmid, pHimarAm-trTurboGFP-SS, and a transposase expression plasmid, pET28Am-trA7) designed to mediate random insertion of the TurboGFP and spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance genes by the Himar1 allele A7 into the A. marginale chromosome. In these trans constructs, expression of the fluorescent and the selectable markers on the transposon, and expression of the transposase are under control of the A. marginale tr promoter. Constructs were co-electroporated into A. marginale St. Maries purified from tick cell culture, and bacteria incubated for 2 months under selection with a combination of spectinomycin and streptomycin. At that time, ≤1% of tick cells contained colonies of brightly fluorescent Anaplasma, which eventually increased to infect about 80–90% of the cells. Cloning of the insertion site in E. coli and DNA sequence analyses demonstrated insertion of the entire plasmid pHimarAm-trTurboGFP-SS encoding the transposon in frame into the native tr region of A. marginale in an apparent single homologous crossover event not mediated by the transposase. Transformants are fastidious and require longer subculture intervals than wild type A. marginale. This result suggests that A. marginale, as well as possibly other species of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia, can be transformed using a strategy of homologous recombination.     

Tick transmission of Anaplasma centrale

Anaplasma centrale was isolated from a field collection of Rhipicephalus simus. Transstadial transmission of A. centrale with adult ticks was demonstrated, but the infection was not carried transovarially. Ticks from this collection were subsequently reared as a non-infected, laboratory strain. It was proved that the Onderstepoort live blood vaccine strain of A. centrale, isolated by Theiler in 1911, is still tick transmissible after more than 75 years of needle passage through cattle in the laboratory. Attempts to demonstrate transstadial transmission of the vaccine strain with Boophilus decoloratus and Boophilus microplus failed.