三种硝化抑制剂抑制土壤硝化作用比较及用量研究

【目的】硝化抑制剂是调控土壤氮素转化与硝化作用微生物群落结构的有效途径。本文通过室内模拟试验对3种硝化抑制剂在不同剂量下的硝化抑制效果进行研究,旨在筛选出效果最佳的剂型与剂量,为石灰性土壤硝化抑制剂的合理应用提供依据。 【方法】培养试验在生长箱内进行,25℃黑暗条件培养;盆栽试验在温室内进行。供试硝化抑制剂为双氰胺（DCD）、3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐（DMPP）和2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶（Nitrapyrin）,DCD和DMPP用量均设定为纯氮（N）量的0（CK）、1.0%、2.0%、3.0%、3.5%、4.0%、4.5%、5.0%、6.0%和7.0%;Nitrapyrin用量分别为纯氮量的0、0.1%、0.125%、0.2%、0.25%、0.3%、0.35%、0.4%、0.45%和0.5%,三种硝化抑制剂均设10个水平,每个水平3次重复。盆栽试验氮加入量为每公斤风干土0.50 g,三种硝化抑制剂用量分别为纯氮用量的5%、1%、0.648%。调查比较了三者的硝化抑制效果及对土壤氮素转化的影响及其对小青菜鲜重的生物学效应;采用变性梯度凝胶电泳（DGGE）法分析了不同硝化抑制剂对土壤AOA、AOB群落结构的影响。 【结果】DCD、DMPP、Nitrapyrin均可显著抑制土壤硝化作用（P＜0.05）,各硝化抑制剂处理土壤的NH₄+-N含量分别较对照提高了46.2~256.1 mg/kg、291.8~376.7 mg/kg、3.68~372.9 mg/kg。DCD与DMPP处理的硝化抑制率分别为49.3%~79.4%和96.4%~99.4%,DCD表现出明显的剂量效应,但DMPP在1%~7%浓度范围内的剂量效应不明显。Nitrapyrin在0.1%~0.2%浓度范围内有明显的剂量效应。0.25%~0.5% Nitrapyrin的硝化抑制率为98.9%~99.9%,其硝化抑制效果与DMPP处理相同。DCD、DMPP、Nitrapyrin处理的小青菜地上部分鲜重分别比氮肥处理（ASN）提高了12.7%、11.1%、17.6%。施用硝化抑制剂可改变土壤AOA和AOB群落结构,且对AOA群落结构的影响大于AOB,不同硝化抑制剂之间对AOA和AOB群落结构的影响无差异。 【结论】3种硝化抑制剂的硝化抑制效果表现为Nitrapyrin≥DMPP>DCD,均对AOA与AOB群落结构产生明显影响。各硝化抑制剂处理均可提高小青菜地上部鲜重、叶片Vc含量及可显著提高小青菜叶片氨基酸含量（P＜0.05）。综合比较,Nitrapyrin硝化抑制效果好于DMPP,DCD效果最差,推荐用量为基于纯氮0.25%的Nitrapyrin添加量。     

Potency of nitrification inhibitors following their repeated application to soil

Summary Nitrification inhibitors were applied to a field experiment on loamy sand soil each autumn for 4 years, immediately prior to sowing winter cereals. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that repeated application of the inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) to a soil had little effect either on the rate of DCD decomposition or the ability of DCD to inhibit nitrification. Repeated field application of the inhibitors DCD, nitrapyrin or etridiazole resulted in increased sensitivity of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria to nitrapyrin or etridiazole, but not to DCD. The rate of decomposition of etridiazole was unaffected by four annual applications of this inhibitor, but decomposition of nitrapyrin was somewhat slower in soil that had received nitrapyrin annually for 4 years than in soil that had never been treated with an inhibitor.     

Late spring nitrogen applications on wheat on a poorly drained soil

Many of the poorly drained clayey soils of the Mississippi River delta region in Arkansas are used for soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production. Oftentimes, excessive rainfall occurs between the last N application and physiological maturity, resulting in soil conditions conducive to denitrification. Studies were conducted in 1989 and 1990 to evaluate late N applications on five wheat cultivars on a Sharkey silty clay (very fine, montmorillonitic, nonacid, thermic, Vertic Haplaquepts) at Keiser, AR. A linear‐move irrigation system was used to maintain excessive soil moisture conditions throughout the spring growing season to best insure denitrification conditions. After the recommended spring N was applied, N as urea was applied at rates of 0, 34, and 68 kg ha^‐1 at growth stage (GS) 9 in 1989 and GS 10 in 1990. Ammonium nitrate was also evaluated at the 34 kg N ha^‐1 rate. Grain yield, yield components, whole‐plant N concentration, grain N content, and whole‐plant N uptake were evaluated. Grain yield increased each year with late N applications. The optimum N rate was 34 kg ha^‐1 with no difference between the N sources, urea and ammonium nitrate. The yield component accounting for this grain yield increase were kernels per spike in 1989 and kernel weight and kernels per spike in 1990. Whole plant N concentration increased each year and grain N content increased in 1990 with the late N application. The N sources affected N nutrition similarly.     

Decomposition rate of dicyandiamide and nitrification inhibition

Abstract

Degradation of dicyandiamide (DCD) was assayed in laboratory studies at 8, 15, and 22 C in a Decatur silt loam and in a Norfolk loamy sand. Dicyandiamide was very short lived at 22 C, with half‐lives of 7.4 and 14.7 days in the Decatur and Norfolk soils, respectively. In the Norfolk soil at 8 C, half‐life increased to 52.2 days. In a nitrificaton study of both soils at 22 C, 80 mg (NH₄)₂SO₄‐N kg^‐1 of soil was applied with 20 mg DCD‐N kg^‐1 of soil and 100 mg kg^‐1 (NH₄)₂S0₄‐N was added with 5% nitrapyrin. Distinct lag phases preceded zero order nitrification with the inhibitor treatments. Lag periods were 2 and 2.6 times the half life of DCD in the degradation study for Decatur and Norfolk soils, respectively. Like most nitrification inhibitors, the effectiveness of DCD decreases with increasing temperature. In the Norfolk loamy sand, nitrification inhibition by DCD was equal to nitrapyrin for up to 42 days, but in Decatur silt loam, DCD was less potent to nitrapyrin as a nitrification inhibitor.     

Evaluation of Two Products Recently Introduced as Nitrification Inhibitors

This study compared the relative effectiveness of two products recently introduced as nitrification inhibitors with other materials used to inhibit nitrification. Four soils were treated with 0, 0.2, 1, 5, and 25 mg kg^?1 of nitrapyrin (NP), a new microencapsulated nitrapyrin product (ENP), dicyandiamide (DCD), a new maleic-itaconic polymer product (MIP), and ammonium thiosulfate (ATS). The soils were also treated with 200 mg N kg^?1 as urea, and percent inhibition of nitrification determined after 2 or 4 weeks of incubation. After 4 weeks, similar levels of nitrification inhibition were provided by 1 mg kg^?1 of NP (72%), 5 mg kg^?1 of ENP (79%), and 25 mg kg^?1 of DCD (73%), averaged across soil. After 4 weeks with a sandy soil, the highest rate of MIP and ATS provided 15 and 36% inhibition, respectively. MIP and ATS were ineffective at inhibiting nitrification when added to the other three soils.

Abbreviations: ATS: ammonium thiosulfate; DCD: dicyandiamide; ENP: encapsulated nitrapyrin; MIP: maleic-itaconic polymer; NP: nitrapyrin; UAN: urea-ammonium nitrate liquid fertilizer     

DCD 在不同质地土壤上的硝化抑制效果和剂量效应研究

通过硝化抑制剂抑制土壤硝化作用是实现作物铵硝混合营养和提高氮肥利用率的重要途径之一。本试验采用室内模拟的方法, 在人工气候室(25 ℃)黑暗培养条件下, 应用新疆石灰性土壤研究了不同剂量的双氰胺(dicyandiamide, DCD)在砂土、壤土、黏土3 种不同质地土壤中对土壤硝态氮、铵态氮转化的影响及DCD 的剂量效应和硝化抑制效果。处理30 d 内, 各剂量DCD 处理对砂土的硝化抑制率为96.5%~99.4%(平均值为98.3%), 在黏土上为66.9%~85.6%(平均值为77.6%), 在壤土上为49.3%~79.4%(平均值为67.7%), 总体硝化抑制率表现为砂土>黏土>壤土。在砂土上DCD 的剂量效应不明显, DCD 用量从纯氮的1.0%增加到7.0%时, 土壤中硝态氮含量仅增加1.9~10.7 mg·kg^-1(培养30 d 时); 而在壤土和黏土中, 土壤硝态氮含量随DCD 浓度的增加而显著下降, 存在明显剂量效应。这说明施用DCD 可显著抑制新疆石灰性土壤的硝化作用过程, 在砂土、壤土、黏土中DCD 的最佳浓度分别为纯氮用量的6.0%、7.0%和7.0%, 并在培养30 d 内发挥显著作用。     

Dicyandiamide (DCD) as a nitrification inhibitor for rice culture in the United States

Abstract

Efficient nitrogen (N) fertilizer management for paddy rice production is difficult because of potentially high N losses from denitrification, NH₃ volatilization, and leaching. The use of a nitrification inhibitor, by slowing the rate of nitrification of NH₄ ⁺‐N sources prior to flooding, offers the potential to reduce denitrification losses that occur after flooding. Dicyandiamide (DCD) is one such nitrification inhibitor. The objective of this series of studies was to evaluate DCD for its effectiveness as a nitrification inhibitor in paddy rice production across an array of soils, management systems, and climate conditions.

Studies were conducted on fine‐ and medium‐textured soils in Arkansas, California, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Dicyandiamide was coated onto or formulated with urea (7 or 10% of total N as DCD‐N) and applied either broadcast pre‐plant incorporated or broadcast as a topdress application prior to flooding at the 4‐ to 5‐leaf development stage of the rice plant. These treatments were compared with urea applied either pre‐plant incorporated or in multiple applications timed to the peak N demand periods of rice. An array of N rates were used to model the yield response to levels of N. Similar studies utilizing ¹⁵N‐enriched urea were also conducted.

The studies indicated that use of DCD delayed nitrification and tended to result in rice grain yield increases as compared with urea applied pre‐plant without DCD in drill‐seeded rice; however, proper application of urea in split applications gave more consistent results. In water‐seeded continuously flooded rice culture, use of DCD was advantageous only if the flood was delayed for more than 14 days after urea application. The ¹⁵N‐enriched studies indicated that highest N fertilizer recovery was associated with split topdress urea applications; however, addition of DCD resulted in increased immobilization of fertilizer N and release of soil N.     

Nitrogen efficiency of grain sorghum grown on flat and raised seedbeds on poorly drained soil

Grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) production commonly occurs on poorly drained clayey soils of the Mississippi River delta region inArkansas. Raised, wide seedbeds may improve grain yield and fertilizer N efficiency for narrow‐row sorghum production on these soils. The influence of individual row positions on raised, wide seedbeds was compared to conventional flat seedbed for grain yield, yield components, dry weight, and N uptake. A 193‐cm wide and 15 cm high crowned seedbed (CB) was compared to the flat seedbed (FB) in 1987 and 1988 on a Sharkey silty clay (very fine, mont‐morillonitic, nonacid, thermic, Vertic Haplaquepts) at Keiser, AR. Three rows were planted on each seedbed treatment; one in the middle of the bed and one row 48 cm to each side of the row in the middle. Nitrogen rates of 0, 56, 112, and 168 kg/ha were applied at planting. In addition, two split applications at the 168 kg/ha N rate (56 kg N/ha at planting and 112 kg N/ha at either four‐leaf or eight‐leaf growth stage) were evaluated. Each row position was evaluated for grain yield, yield components, plant dry weight, and N uptake. Whole plant samples were collected at the anthesis and physiological maturity growth stages. The field average grain yield was higher on the CB each year regardless of N rate applied at planting. This yield increase on the CB was related to the row on the top of the CB yielding more than the equivalent row on the FB. The responses of plant dry weight at each growth stage, N uptake at each growth stage, and N content of the seed was similar to grain yield responses. The split N application at planting and the eight‐leaf growth stage was as effective or better than any other treatment for increasing grain yield, N uptake, and seed N content.     

Laboratory evaluation of dicyandiamide as a soil nitrification inhibitor

Abstract

Laboratory studies to evaluate dicyandiamide (DCD) as a soil nitrification inhibitor showed that it is considerably more effective than several compounds that have been patented or proposed as fertilizer amendments for retarding nitrification of fertilizer nitrogen (N) in soil, but is considerably less effective than 2‐ethynylpyridine, nitrapyrin (N‐Serve), etridiazole (Dwell), 3‐methylpyrazole‐l‐carboxamide (MPC), or 4‐amino‐l,2,4‐triazole (ATC). Other findings in studies reported were as follows: a) DCD is more effective for inhibiting nitrification of ammonium‐N than of urea‐N; b) the effectiveness of DCD as a nitrification inhibitor is markedly affected by soil temperature and soil type and is limited by the susceptibility of DCD to leaching; c) DCD has very little, if any, effect on urea hydrolysis, denitrification, or seed germination in soil; d) products of DCD decomposition in soil (guanylurea and guanidine) have little, if any, effect on nitrification compared with DCD; e) in the absence of leaching, the persistence of the inhibitory effect of DCD on nitrification decreases with increase in soil temperature from 10 to 30°C, but the inhibitory effect of 50 μg DCD g^‐1 soil is substantial even after incubation of DCD‐treated soils at 20 or 30°C for 24 weeks.     

Effect of wax-coated calcium carbide and nitrapyrin on nitrogen loss and methane emission from dry-seeded flooded rice

Summary The effectiveness of wax-coated calcium carbide (as a slow-release source of acetylene) and nitrapyrin in inhibiting nitrification and emission of the greenhouse gases N₂O and CH₄ was evaluated in a microplot study with dry-seeded flooded rice grown on a grey clay near Griffith, NSW, Australia. The treatments consisted of factorial combinations of N levels with nitrification inhibitors (control, wax-coated calcium carbide, and nitrapyrin). The rate of nitrification was slowed considerably by the addition of wax-coated calcium carbide, but it was inhibited only slightly by the addition of nitrapyrin. As a result, the emission of N₂O was markedly reduced by the application of wax-coated calcium carbide, whereas there was no significant difference in rates of N₂O emission between the control and nitrapyrin treatments. Both nitrification inhibitors significantly reduced CH₄ emission, but the lowest emission rates were observed in the wax-coated calcium carbide treatment. At the end of the experiment 84% of the applied N was recovered from the wax-coated calcium carbide treatment compared with 43% for the nitrapyrin and control treatments.     

Effects of nitrapyrin,terrazole, and simazine on soil nitrogen transformation and corn growth

Abstract

Nitrapyrin, terrazole and simazine were evaluated as chemical inhibitors of biological nitrification and denitrification. Corn (Zea mays L. cv. Hybrid Pioneer 3343) was grown in 60‐liter pots filled with a 50/50 (V/V) sand/Cecil clay mixture. Chemical treatments consisted of weekly applications of 0.25 ppm nitrapyrin, terrazole and/or simazine concurrently with 20 ppm N as either (NH₄)₂SO₄ or Ca(NO₃)₂ for 9 weeks. Thereafter, only N (20 ppm per pot) was applied to the media every three days for 4 weeks. Nitrapyrin, terrazole and simazine reduced nitrification resulting in both higher total plant N and residual soil NH₄ content relative to the control plants and soil. Plant growth was reduced by the inhibitory effects of the chemicals on nitrification and subsequent NH₄ accumulation in the medium. All chemicals reduced denitrification with terrazole being more effective than nitrapyrin as reflected by higher N contents of plants and residual soil NO₃‐N. Nitrapyrin and/or terrazole applied with Ca(NO₃)₂ increased plant biomass, but simazine, by inducing higher N0₂ concentration in the plant tissues, sharply reduced plant growth relative to the other treatments. When simazine was part of the chemical treatment, its effects on plant growth and total N contents generally outweighed or masked those of nitrapyrin or terrazole.     

Nitrapyrin,terrazole, atrazine,and simazine influence on nitrification and corn growth

Most farming systems involving tilled crops require use of pesticides and nitrogen fertilizers in different combinations although most pesticides effects on soil N transformation are scantly documented. Studies were initiated to compare atrazine and simazine herbicides with two biological nitrification inhibitors (nitrapyrin and terrazole) for their effects on biological nitrification and corn (Zea mays L.) growth. In a laboratory study, inhibition of nitrification was less than 3% in a Tifton loamy sand incubated with 10 μg a.i g^‐1 soil atrazine or simazine but was more than 10% in soil amended with nitrapyrin or terrazole, applied separately or in combinations with either herbicide at the same rate. Similar trends were observed with soil treated with different combinations of 2.5 μg a.i. g^‐1 soil nitrapyrin or terrazole and 1.25 μg a.i. g^‐1 soil atrazine or simazine and incubated with and without corn plants under greenhouse conditions. The combination of either herbicide with nitrapyrin or terrazole significantly reduced the corn dry weights with substantial accumulation of Kjeldahl N and NO₃ ^‐ in tissues of plants, probably due to a concentration effect. However, these chemical combinations, applied at the rate of 1.2 kg a.i. ha^‐1 in conjunction with 35 kg ha^‐1 N as (NH₄)₂SO₄ in split banded applications (at planting and at the 6^th leaf stage), showed a nonsignificant trend towards increased corn ear yields in two‐year field studies. Generally, when atrazine or simazine was part of the chemical treatment, its effects on nitrification, plant growth and total N contents outweighed or masked those of nitrapyrin or terrazole.     

不同硝化抑制剂组合对铵态氮在黑土和褐土中转化的影响

【目的】添加硝化抑制剂和氮肥增效剂是提高氮肥利用率的有效方法。研究不同硝化抑制剂和氮肥增效剂组合对不同性质土壤中铵态氮转化特征的影响,为科学合理选择抑制剂提供理论依据。【方法】供试生化抑制剂包括2-氯-6 (三氯甲基) -吡啶 (Nitrapyrin,CP)、3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐 (DMPP)、1-甲氨甲酰-3-甲基吡唑 (CMP)、3-甲基吡唑 (MP)、2-氨基-4-氯-6-甲基嘧啶 (AM)、N-guard、二氰二胺 (DCD)。供试土壤为黑土和褐土,以氯化铵为氮肥,按照常用量添加各生化抑制剂制备稳定性肥料,用于室内恒温、恒湿土壤培养试验。试验设不施肥 (CK)、氯化铵 (N)、N + CP、N + CP + AM、N + CP + DCD、N + CP + N-guard、N + CP + DMPP、N + CP + CMP、N + CP + MP等9个处理。在培养第1、4、7、11、15、22、30、45、60、75、90、105、120天取土样,测定土壤含水量、土壤NH₄+-N和NO₃–-N含量,并计算硝化抑制率。【结果】在黑土和褐土两种类型土壤中,铵态氮转化特征具有显著差异,在弱酸性黑土中硝化反应速率显著低于碱性褐土。在黑土中,不同硝化抑制剂组合N + CP、N + CP + N-guard、N + CP + DMPP、N + CP + DCD、N + CP + CMP、N + CP + AM、N + CP + MP都表现出较好的硝化抑制效果,可以维持黑土中较高的铵态氮含量超过4个月以上。其中N + CP、N + CP + DCD、N + CP + N-guard处理在120天时,其硝化抑制率为37%～40%。而N + CP + AM、N + CP + MP、N + CP + DMPP为32%～36%,N + CP + CMP为26%。在褐土中,N + CP + DCD组合硝化抑制效果最大,在培养120天,其硝化抑制率为20%;其次是N + CP、N + CP + AM,其硝化抑制率在培养第105天时分别为23%、12%,在培养第90天时分别为63%、60%;N + CP + N-guard、N + CP + DMPP、N + CP + MP、N + CP + CMP在培养第75天时硝化抑制率分别为43%、42%、37%、35%,有效硝化抑制作用时间可维持75天左右。【结论】在黑土和褐土2种不同类型土壤中施用氯化铵氮肥,应添加专一硝化抑制剂或组合制成高效稳定性铵态氮肥。在湿润地区pH较低的酸性土壤上,例如黑土,适宜的硝化抑制剂较多,其中N + CP或N + CP + N-guard、N + CP + DCD组合的硝化抑制效果显著且持续时间长。在干旱半干旱的碱性土壤上,例如褐土,N + CP + DCD组合的硝化抑制效果和持续时间优于其他组合,可用于褐土上施用的高效稳定性氯化铵氮肥的生产。     

Crop yield and soil nitrogen dynamics in an intermittently flooded rice field affected by nitrification inhibitors

A field experiment was conducted to study yield and soil N dynamics in an irrigated, intermittently submerged rice field at New Delhi, India, where chemically synthesized as well as neem derived urea coating nitrification inhibitors with prilled urea were applied. Rice (var. IR-32) was grown on a Typic Ustochrept alluvial soil. No nitrogen (control), prilled urea alone, prilled urea mixed with dicyandiamide (DCD), neem (powdered Azadirachta indica Juss. seeds) coated urea and Nimin (commercial derivative of neem) coated urea were tested for their efficacy in regulating yield and conservation of N. None of the inhibitors could increase biomass or grain yield over urea. But all the inhibitors were able to conserve soil ammonium and DCD was the most efficient nitrification inhibitor followed by Nimin coated urea. N-uptake, recovery, physiological and agronomic efficiencies were highest in urea treated plots. The performances of all the inhibitors were against the popular trend where crop yield and N-uptake were enhanced by their application. But, more studies are required on the performance of these inhibitors in rice fields to come to a stronger conclusion.     

Effects of the nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin and tillage practices on yield-scaled nitrous oxide emission from a maize field in Iran

Nitrification inhibitors can effectively decrease nitrification rates and nitrous oxide(N₂O)emission while increasing crop yield under certain conditions.However,there is no information available on the effects of nitrification inhibitors and tillage practices on N₂O emissions from maize cropping in Iran.To study how tillage practices and nitrapyrin(a nitrification inhibitor)affect N₂O emission,a split factorial experiment using a completely randomized block design with three replications was carried out in Northeast Iran,which has a cold semiarid climate.Two main plots were created with conventional tillage and minimum tillage levels,and two nitrogen(N)fertilizer(urea)management systems(with and without nitrapyrin application)were created as subplots.Tillage level did not have any significant effect on soil ammonium(NH₄⁺)and nitrate(NO₃^-)concentrations,cumulative amount and yield-scaled N₂O emission,and aboveground biomass of maize,whereas nitrapyrin application showed significant effect.Nitrapyrin application significantly reduced the cumulative amount of N₂O emission by 41%and 32%in conventional tillage and minimum tillage practices,respectively.A reduction in soil NO₃^-concentration by nitrapyrin was also observed.The average yield-scaled N₂O emission was 13.6 g N₂O-N kg^-1N uptake in both tillage systems without nitrapyrin application and was significantly reduced to 7.9 and 8.2 g N₂O-N kg^-1N uptake upon the application of nitrapyrin in minimum tillage and conventional tillage practices,respectively.Additionally,nitrapyrin application increased maize biomass yield by 4%and 13%in the minimum tillage and conventional tillage systems,respectively.Our results indicate that nitrapyrin has a potential role in reducing N₂O emission from agricultural systems where urea fertilizers are broadcasted,which is common in Iran due to the practice of traditional farming.     

Dicyandiamide effects on nitrification and total inorganic soil nitrogen in sandy soils

Abstract

Inhibition of nitrification in soil results in a decreased ratio of nitrate‐nitrogen (NO₃‐N) to ammonium‐nitrogen (NH₄‐N). If the conditions for NO₃‐N loss by leaching or denitrification exist, nitrification inhibitors should increase concentrations of total inorganic soil nitrogen (N) (TISN) (NH₄‐N + NO₃‐N). This can then result in plants taking up more N and developing more crop yield or biomass. This study examined whether inhibition of nitrification by dicyandiamide (DCD) would result in increased concentrations of TISN under field conditions. The effects of DCD on soil N were evaluated in hyperthermic sandy soils planted to potato (Solanum tuberosum L., cv. Atlantic). Treatments were factorial combinations of N as ammonium nitrate (NH₄NO₃) at 67, 134, and 202 kg N ha^‐1 and DCD at 0, 5.6, and 11.2 kg DCD ha^‐1. Soil NH₄‐N, NO₃‐N, and TISN concentrations were determined for up to five potato growth stages at two locations for two years for a total of 16 determinations (cases), i.e., four were not determined. The N form ratio [NO₃‐N/(NH₄‐N + NO₃‐N] x 100 was decreased in 10 of 16 cases, indicating that nitrification was inhibited by DCD. With two of these 10 cases, TISN concentration increased, but with four others, TISN concentration decreased with at least one N rate. With four of these 10 cases, inhibition of nitrification had no effect on TISN concentration. Under the conditions of these field studies, DCD inhibited nitrification more often than not. Inhibition of nitrification was, however, more likely to reduce TISN concentration than to increase it. This may have been due to DCD effects on immobization of applied NH₄‐N.     

三种硝化抑制剂在石灰性土壤中的应用效果比较

在人工气候室内采用25℃黑暗培养法研究双氰胺(DCD)、3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸(DMPP)及2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶(Nitrapyrin)在石灰性土壤中的硝化抑制效果。结果表明:施用DCD、DMPP、Nitrapyrin的土壤NH4+-N含量较单施硫酸铵的土壤(对照)分别提高228.45~244.85 mg/kg(砂土)、209.75~254.79 mg/kg(黏土),NO3--N含量较对照分别降低93.85%~94.99%(砂土)、91.82%~95.38%(黏土)。表观硝化率随培养进程增加缓慢,培养期间只增加了1.28%~2.09%(砂土)、2.72%~8.40%(黏土),而对照增加了86.00%(砂土)、80.89%(黏土)。3种硝化抑制剂均显著抑制了石灰性土壤中硫酸铵水解铵硝化作用的进行,并且在砂土中的硝化抑制率高于黏土,硝化抑制效果最好的为DMPP处理,0.54%Nitrapyrin处理次之但用量最小,0.27%Nitrapyrin和10.8%DCD处理抑制效果相对较弱。     

几种硝化抑制剂和包硫尿素(SCU)对土壤N素形态和小麦产量的影响

采用土壤盆栽法,研究了双氰胺(DCD)、硫脲(THU)和硫脲甲醛树脂(TFR)以及包硫尿素(SCU)对土壤氮素形态和小麦产量的影响。试验共设不施氮(CK)、单施尿素、包硫尿素(SCU)、以及尿素分别与DCD、THA、TUF的3个浓度梯度(分别按尿素用量的0.5%、1%、2%)配合施用共12个处理。结果表明:随添加浓度的增加,硝化抑制作用逐渐增强,高剂量硝化抑制剂显著降低土壤NO-3-N含量,在2%添加浓度下,DCD、THU、TFR的土壤NO-3-N浓度分别比单施尿素降低29%、22%和14%,对土壤表观硝化率的抑制强度也是2%DCD2%THU2%TFR;SCU处理与2%DCD作用强度接近,且在施用早期就体现抑制效果,并在追肥后第74 d土壤表观硝化率显著低于使用硝化抑制剂的处理(P0.05);硝化抑制剂和SCU都可以使土壤NH+4-N含量稳定在较高的水平,抑制剂用量越多,土壤NH+4-N含量越高;与单施尿素相比,尿素+DCD模式,均可提高小麦产量,且在0.5%、1%、2%添加浓度,都达到显著水平(P0.05);THU在1.0%和2.0%添加浓度,小麦产量显著高于单施尿素,但增产效果次于DCD。总体上,包硫尿素(SCU)比硝化抑制剂在控释氮素方面效果更持久,而3种硝化抑制剂中,在控制土壤NH+4-N转化、土壤硝化抑制方面,DCD和THU优于TFR;作为外源添加物的抑制剂长期应用可能对土壤环境造成潜在的危害,不同硝化抑制在土壤中的形态归趋和长期作用还有待进一步研究。     

Effect of ammonium thilosulfate and dicyandiamide on residual ammonium in fertilizer bands

Abstract

Ammonium thiosulfate (ATS, 12–0–0–26S) and dicyandiamide (DCD, 66–0–0) are fertilizer products that also inhibit nitrification. It has also been proposed that ATS can improve the nitrification inhibition properties of DCD. The purpose of this research was to compare the effects of ATS, DCD, and ATS/DCD mixtures on the nitrification of banded urea solution or urea‐ammonium nitrate (UAN) under laboratory, field microplot, and field conditions. The laboratory study demonstrated that adding 8.7% (vol vol^‐1) ATS to a urea solution inhibited nitrification by 68%. Inhibition of nitrification was greater with ATS + DCD than with DCD alone. Some nitrite accumulated when ATS was added, but little or no nitrite accumulated when both ATS and DCD were present In field microplot studies, the addition of ATS to urea solution significantly (P ≤ 0.10) increased residual soil ammonium levels over urea alone at six of 11 trials. ATS was usually a less effective nitrification inhibitor than was DCD, and ATS + DCD outperformed DCD at only one of 11 trials. In all three field trials, adding ATS to banded UAN solution led to increased residual ammonium levels. Again, ATS was less effective than DCD or nitrapyrin as a nitrification inhibitor, and no ATS/DCD synergism was observed. It was concluded that the use of ATS as a sulfur fertilizer in fluid fertilizer bands can lead to measurable inhibition of nitrification, but ATS was not as reliable as DCD or nitrapyrin.     

Nitrous oxide emissions from grassland and spring barley, following N fertiliser application with and without nitrification inhibitors

The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of the nitrification inhibitors dicyandiamide (DCD) and nitrapyrin on reducing emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O) following application of NH₄ ⁺ or NH₄ ⁺-forming fertilisers to grassland and spring barley. DCD was applied to grassland with N fertiliser applications in April and August in 1992 and 1993, inhibiting N₂O emissions by varying amounts depending on the fertiliser form and the time of application. Over periods of up to 2 months following each application of DCD, emissions of N₂O were reduced by 58–78% when applied with urea (U) and 41–65% when applied with ammonium sulphate (AS). Annual emissions (April to March) of N₂O were reduced by up to 58% and 56% in 1992–1993 and 1993–1994, respectively. Applying DCD to ammonium nitrate (AN) fertilised grassland did not reduce emissions after the April 1993 fertilisation, but emissions following the August application were reduced. Nitrapyrin was only applied once, with the April fertiliser applications in 1992, reducing N₂O emissions over the following 12 months by up to 40% when applied with U. When N fertiliser was applied in June without DCD, the DCD applied in April was still partly effective; N₂O emissions were reduced 50%, 60% and 80% as effectively as the emissions following the April applications, for AS in 1993, U in 1992 and 1993, respectively. In 1992 the persistence of an inhibitory effect was greater for nitrapyrin than for DCD, increasing after the June fertiliser application as overall emissions from U increased. There was no apparent reduction in effectiveness following repeated applications of DCD over the 2 years. N₂O emissions from spring barley, measured only in 1993, were lower than from grassland. DCD reduced emissions from applied U by 40% but there was no reduction with AN. The results demonstrate considerable scope for reducing emissions by applying nitrification inhibitors with NH₄ ⁺ or NH₄ ⁺-forming fertilisers; this is especially so for crops such as intensively managed grass where there are several applications of fertiliser nitrogen per season, as the effect of inhibitors applied in April persists until after a second fertiliser application in June. Received: 30 August 1996