A Modification to the Adams‐Evans Soil Buffer Determination Solution

Abstract

Many soil analysis labs routinely determine lime requirement of acidic soils using different buffer solutions for optimum plant growth. The Adams‐Evans lime determination solution was introduced more than 40 years ago and has been used by many soil analysis labs. Even though many buffer solutions have been developed since then, very little attention has been paid to address the toxic nature of chemicals involved in buffer solutions. The most commonly used buffer solutions, such as the Adams-Evans, Shoemaker‐McLean‐Pratt (SMP), Woodruff, and others, contain p‐nitrophenol, which is toxic to humans and the environment. Use of p‐nitrophenol requires prescribed containment and disposal procedures, that creates extra burden on soil analysis labs that provide their invaluable service at low cost. Replacing p‐nitrophenol with monobasic potassium phosphate (KH₂PO₄), which has similar buffering capacity but with no known toxicity, is beneficial to soil testing labs and the environment. The original Adams‐Evans buffer solution was compared with the modified Adams‐Evans buffer solution with soils of different pH, cation exchange capacity and lime requirement. The linear regression between the buffer pH values and lime recommendations made by Adams‐Evans and the modified Adams‐Evans solutions were highly significant. Thus, the modified Adams‐Evans buffer solution can be used without loss of established recommendation criteria as the original buffer solution.     

Evaluation of Four Buffer Solutions for Determining the Lime Requirement for Ohio Soils

Lime is used as a soil amendment to achieve the optimum pH suitable for good crop growth. Buffer pH (BpH) measurements have been calibrated to relate the linear drop in pH of the soil–buffer system to the amount of lime needed to neutralize soil to a certain pH level. The amount of lime required to neutralize soil acidity, called the lime requirement (LR), is obtained from soil–limestone (CaCO₃) incubations. In this study, 13 soils from Ohio were incubated with CaCO₃ for a period of 1 month to determine the LR to achieve different target pHs. This LR was then regressed with the different BpHs of four buffer solutions [(1) Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (SMP), (2) Sikora, (3) Mehlich, and (4) modified Mehlich] to obtain calibration equations. The Sikora and modified Mehlich buffers are variations of the SMP and Mehlich buffers, respectively, but they are designed to promote buffering without use of any hazardous constituents [i.e., chromium(VI) in SMP buffer and barium in the Mehlich buffer]. This study was done to verify the applicability of the buffers that do not contain any hazardous constituents and to calibrate these buffers for predicting lime requirement needs for Ohio soils. Comparing the calibrated equations of the SMP and Sikora buffers with CaCO₃‐incubation LR recommendations revealed that the SMP and Sikora buffer solutions were not significantly different, and a single calibrated equation can be used for these two buffers to determine LR predictions in Ohio. The Mehlich and modified Mehlich calibration equations differed significantly from the SMP calibration equations and were not as highly correlated with CaCO₃‐incubation LR recommendations using a linear model (r² < 0.54). Thus, it is possible to use the Mehlich and modified Mehlich for determining lime recommendations, but they require a correction factor such as inclusion of the initial soil pH to improve the precision of the LR prediction. We also found the various buffers tested in this study were better able to predict LR rates for greater LR soils than low LR soils. In conclusion, successful laboratory tests to predict LR for Ohio soils are possible using alternative buffers that do not contain hazardous constituents.     

Comparison of Shoemaker–McLean–Pratt and Modified Mehlich Buffer Tests for Lime Requirement on Pennsylvania Soils

Abstract

The Shoemaker–McLean–Pratt (SMP) buffer test is commonly used in Pennsylvania and throughout the United States to determine the lime requirement (LR) of acid soils. The buffer contains potassium chromate, a carcinogen, and all waste must be collected for disposal in a hazardous waste facility. An alternative to the SMP buffer is the Mehlich buffer. Although the Mehlich buffer contains barium chloride (BaCl₂), also a hazardous and regulated compound, calcium chloride (CaCl₂) has been shown to be an effective substitute. The goal of this study was to compare the SMP buffer and the modified Mehlich buffer (CaCl₂ substituted for BaCl₂) for estimating LR on PA soils and to determine if the modified Mehlich buffer could provide an effective alternative to the SMP test. Twenty‐two agriculturally important Pennsylvania soils with pH values ranging from 4.5 to 6.4 were collected, and the actual LR of each soil was determined by incubating soils for 3 months with calcium carbonate. The modified Mehlich buffer was a more accurate predictor of the lime required to raise soils to either pH 6.5 (r²=0.92) or 7.0 (r²=0.87) in comparison to the SMP buffer (r²=0.87 and 0.82, respectively). Comparison of calibration equations for Mehlich buffer versus lime requirement derived in this study were similar to those developed on soils from other states and geographic regions.     

Buffer Ph methods for estimation of lime requirement of tropical acid soils

Abstract

Lime requirements (LR) of 26 agricultural acid soils were estimated using the following buffer methods: Shoemaker‐McLean‐Pratt (SMP) single buffer (SMP‐SB), SMP double buffer (SMP‐DB), Mehlich buffer method for crops with high LR (MEHLICH I), and Mehlich buffer methods for crops with low LR (MEHLICH II). The LR were determined to three pH targets (6.5, 6.0 and 5.5). The LR values were then evaluated through regression analysis using LR values obtained by the Ca(OH)₂ titration (for the 6.5 pH target) and moist CaCO₃‐incubation (for the 6.0 and 5.5 pH targets) as reference methods. All the buffer methods were well correlated with the reference methods but the SMP‐DB gave the best results for both high and low LR soils, and was particularly impressive at the lowest pH target.     

Implementation of Soil Lime Requirement by a Single‐Addition Titration Method

Abstract

Buffers for determining a soil's lime requirement (LR) sometimes contain hazardous chemicals. Our objective was to implement a single‐addition titration with calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)₂] to determine the LR of soils. The soil pH buffering capacity is calculated from the rise in pH from a single addition of base. The LR is calculated from the soil pH buffering capacity, the target pH, and initial soil pH. The LR of 531 randomly selected client samples determined by single‐addition titration were slightly higher than by the Adams–Evans (AE) buffer procedure when LRs were less than 1800 lb per acre. The new procedure recommended about 11% less lime than AE at LRs greater than 1800 lb per acre. Independent evaluations of samples that gave the most widely different LR revealed that the single‐addition titration was more accurate and more precise than the AE buffer.     

Modification of the Mehlich Lime Buffer Test

Routine use of the Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (SMP) lime buffer method resulted in chronic problems with electrode reference junction degradation, stability of readings relative to contact time, and generation of hazardous waste. During method recalibration, the Mehlich buffer was chosen for parallel evaluation with SMP, with the goal of improving method performance and eliminating of hazardous waste. The Mehlich buffer was modified by substituting calcium (Ca) for barium (Ba). The modified Mehlich (MM) buffer was found to be identical to the original with respect to buffering power and linearity over an extended pH range of 3.0–6.6. Seven agronomic soils were incubated with eight rates of calcium carbonate for 90 days. Regression analysis was performed to predict lime requirement (LR) to several target pH levels, based on pH measured in each buffer alone or in both water and buffer. Slightly better predictability was obtained using multiple regressions, with R²>0.95 in all cases. Significant but minor differences occurred between the newly calibrated buffers in extended comparisons. The MM buffer was superior to the SMP during routine usage, with fewer adverse effects on electrodes and the elimination of hazardous waste.     

Effect of calcium carbonate as determined by lime requirement buffer pH methods on soil characteristics and yield of sorghum plants

Abstract

A primary limit to crop production in extended regions of northern Greece is the infertility of acid soils, especially nutrient element unavailability or toxicity. An experiment was conducted to determine under greenhouse conditions which buffer pH method selected in a previous laboratory experiment is best suited to predict the lime requirement (LR) of acid soils which is most appropriate in relation to plant growth and nutrient element uptake of sorghum plants. The lime needs of three naturally occurring acid soils were estimated by three methods: Adams‐Evans (AE), Shoemaker‐McLean‐Pratt single buffer (SMP‐SB), New Woodruff (NWOOD), and the calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)₂] equilibration procedure. Two greenhouse experiments were conducted: (i) Experiment I during the 1996 season with ORESTIAS a sandy loam soil, and (ii) Experiment II during 1997 and 1998 season with XANTHI a loam sandy soil and DRAMA a sandy clay loam soil, respectively. The following results were obtained. Differences were noticed between the soils as well as within the LR methods. The ORESTIAS soil needed 63% more calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) than the XANTHI soil and 70% more than DRAMA soil to achieve the target pH. Among the three LR methods, results showed that in two of the three soils the highest LRs were determined by the NWOOD and the lowest by the Ca(OH)₂ methods. After six weeks of incubation, no one method gave exactly the needed amounts of CaCO to achieve the target pH, the estimated amounts being mostly higher than tiiat needed except for the DRAMA soil. Among the methods, in general the SMP‐SB method predicted lime rates that raised the soil pH nearest to the target pH and the NWOOD soil seemed to be the more consistent for the three soils. The smallest LRs were predicted by the Ca(OH) method. Based upon plant production and nitrogen (N) uptake in the 1996 season, the shoot yields were significantly higher using the SMP‐SB method and lower with the NWOOD method. Similar results were obtained for the XANTHI and DRAMA soils during the 1997 season. On the contrary in the 1998 season (2nd experimental year), the highest yields were obtained with the NWOOD buffer method. For the 1996 and 1997 seasons, tissue N concentrations were partly significantly higher using the SMP‐SB method. In the 1998 vegetation period, the N concentrations were low and the control plants had significantly higher N contents.     

A comparison of Mehlich I and Mehlich III extractants as predictors of manganese,copper and zinc availability in four Delaware soils

Abstract

The relative effectiveness of Mehlich I (.025N H₂SO₄ + .05N HCl) and Mehlich III (0.2N CH₃COOH + 0.25N NH₄NO₃ +.015N NH₄F + .013N HNO₃ + .001M EDTA) extractants as predictors of Mn, Cu and Zn uptake was assessed in a greenhouse experiment with four Delaware soils. The soils were adjusted to eight pH levels by addition of Ca(OH)₂ or elemental S, and received comparable amounts of Mn, Cu and Zn as either (1) MnSO₄ + CuSO₄ + ZnSO₄ or (2) Poultry Manure. Mehlich 1 and III extractable Mn and Zn, but not Cu, were well correlated in most instances. Excellent correlations were obtained between Mn uptake and Mehlich I and Mehlich III extractable Mn, for all soils and sources. In general, however, neither Zn nor Cu was found to correlate well with plant uptake. Based on this study, conversion to Mehlich III, as a routine soil test extractant for micronutrients, would not result in a significant improvement over the currently used Mehlich I extractant.     

Comparative study of selected lime requirement methods for some acid Ghanaian soils

Abstract

The acid soils of the western region of Ghana which hitherto have been relegated to forest and tree crops production are becoming increasingly important for agricultural food crop production in the country. However, on account of their strongly acidic properties, there is the need to apply agricultural lime to the soils to improve upon their productivity. At present, however, information on the lime requirement and appropriate liming practice for these soils is lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the suitability of selected chemical methods for the determination of the lime requirement to predict lime needs of these naturally occurring acid soils. The lime requirement of six acid soils were determined by calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)₂] titration, exchangeable aluminum (Al), and Shoemaker, McLean, and Pratt (SMP) buffer methods. Correlation analysis showed that all the methods were highly correlated with one another. The SMP method was found to be somewhat better than either exchangeable Al or Ca(OH)₂ titration method for estimating the lime requirement of the soils. Hence, the SMP method is recommended for use as the diagnostic index of lime requirement of these soils because of its speed and simplicity. Regression studies on the lime requirement values by the three methods and selected soil properties showed that exchangeable Al and organic carbon were the most important soil factors contributing to the lime requirement of these soils. Clay content was significantly correlated only with the Ca(OH)₂‐based lime requirement values (r = 0.81*).     

Comparison of routine soil tests and EPA method 3050 as extractants for heavy metals in Delaware soils

Abstract

Agricultural use of sewage sludges can be limited by heavy metal accumulations in soils and crops. Information on background levels of total heavy metals in soils and changes in soil metal content due to sludge application are; therefore, critical aspects of long‐term sludge monitoring programs. As soil testing laboratories routinely, and rapidly, determine, in a wide variety of agricultural soils, the levels of some heavy metals and soil properties related to plant availability of these metals (e.g. Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, pH, organic matter, texture), these labs could participate actively in the development and monitoring of environmentally sound sludge application programs. Consequently, the objective of this study was to compare three soil tests (Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, and DTP A) and an USEPA approved method for measuring heavy metals in soils (EPA Method 3050), as extractants for Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in representative agricultural soils of Delaware and in soils from five sites involved in a state‐monitored sludge application program.

Soil tests extracted less than 30% of total (EPA 3050) metals from most soils, with average percentages of total metal extracted (across all soils and metals) of 15%, 32%, and 11% for the Mehlich 1, Mehlich 3, and DTPA, respectively. Statistically significant correlations between total and soil test extractable metal content were obtained with all extractants for Cu, Pb, and Zn, but not Cd and Ni. The Mehlich 1 soil test was best correlated with total Cu and Zn (r=0.78***, 0.60***, respectively), while the chelate‐based extractants (DTPA and Mehlich 3) were better correlated with total Pb (r=0.85***, 0.63***). Multiple regression equations for the prediction of total Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn, from soil test extractable metal in combination with easily measured soil properties (pH, organic matter by loss on ignition, soil volume weight) had R² values ranging from 0.41*** to 0.85***, suggesting that it may be possible to monitor, with reasonable success, heavy metal accumulations in soils using the results of a routine soil test.     

Improved SMP buffer method for determining lime requirements of acid soils

Abstract

Single buffer‐two pH and two‐buffer adaptations were compared as double buffer features of the SMP method using a group of 54 soils of wide range in lime requirement (LR). Data from both methods were highly correlated both with each other and with Ca(OH)₂‐titrated acidity.

Formulas for LR based on the schematics of similar triangles relating differences in measured pH vs corresponding acidities for the double buffer system were developed. A regression equation relating buffer‐indicated LR and Ca(OH)₂ titrated acidity was used to adjust the quick‐test double buffer‐indicated values to levels nearer the actual ones. A recommended SMP double buffer procedure, and a formula for computing LR from soil‐buffer pH's measured by the double buffer, quick‐test method are presented.     

A comparison of lime requirements by five methods on grassland mineral soils in Ireland

Liming is necessary for good nutrient availability and crop growth. Lime use in Ireland is now the lowest in half a century. A recent study shows that grassland mineral soils in Ireland has a mean pH of 5.4 and mean lime requirement (LR) of 9.3 t/ha ground limestone. There have been a number of studies in the USA to re-evaluate LR, but little activity in the European Union (EU) in recent years. The primary aim of our research was to compare five methods for estimating LR, which included the Shoemaker–McLean–Pratt (SMP) buffer method currently used in Ireland (IRL), the Sikora buffer method used at the University of Kentucky (UKY), Ca(OH)₂ titration used at University of Georgia (UGA), the modified Mehlich buffer method used at Penn State University (PSU) and the UK RothLime model, using 57 representative grassland mineral soils from Ireland with a pH range from 4.8 to 6.6. The secondary aim was to explore an alternative to the SMP buffer that does not involve the use of toxic chemicals. The results show good agreement between the pH measured by the Irish and three US laboratories and reasonably good agreement in LR estimated by five methods. The main conclusions are: (1) a significant proportion of grassland on mineral soils in Ireland would benefit from liming to increase soil pH, (2) on average, LRs as recommended in Ireland are higher than those advised elsewhere , ( 3) the target pH in Ireland is high compared with that in other countries and should be reduced from pH 6.5 to 6.2, (4) the SMP buffer method should be replaced by a suitable alternative and, in principle, any of the four methods studied would be suitable, (5) to find the most suitable alternative for accurate LR advice it would be necessary to compare the different methods to the actual LR from incubation of representative soils with calcium hydroxide.     

Lime requirement determination of tropical peat soil using buffer‐pH methods

Abstract

A study was conducted to calibrate and evaluate five buffers for the lime requirement (LR) determination of tropical peat soil. The buffers tested were the Shoemaker‐McLean‐Pratt (SMP); Mehlich; 0.1M ammonium acetate (NH₄OAc); 0.1M barium acetate [(Ba(OAc)₂]; and 0.1M calcium acetate [Ca(OAc)₂]. Calibration was done by comparing the precision of linear regression equations adjusted to the relationships between the LR rates required to achieve pH 5.0 measured in a 1: 4 (soiltwater) ratio as determined by incubation and soil‐buffer pH values. Incubation LR using calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) to achieve pH 5.0 by peat soil was utilized to calibrate each buffer. Evaluation was carried out by assessing the LR from the calibrated buffers which estimate the LR nearest to the target pH of 5.0. The calibration study showed that the SMP and Mehlich buffers were less precise than the Ba(OAc)₂, NH₄OAc, and Ca(OAc)₂ buffers. The evaluation study indicated that the Ba(OAc)₂ buffer is the most accurate, followed by NH₄OAc and Ca(OAc)₂ buffers. The Ba(OAc)₂ buffer method is recommended for LR determination of tropical peat soil and NEUOAc or Ca(OAc)₂ as an alternative method.     

Principles underlying the practice of determining lime requirements of acid soils by use of buffer methods

Abstract

A buffer is generally a mixture of a weak acid and a salt of the same weak acid. Hence it can neutralize both acids and bases, and thus resists marked changes in pH of a system. Yet systematic change in pH of a buffer caused by addition of an acidic substance can be used to indicate the total acidity represented by the change in buffer pH. Since acid soil is itself a buffer, when it is added to a buffer mixture for the purpose of measuring its acidity or lime requirement (LR), the resulting double‐buffer suspension (soil‐buffer) is a relatively complex system. Much of the complication in interpreting the changes in buffer pH brought about by mixing soil and buffer stems from the facts: i) that much of the acidity is pH‐dependent, and ii) that quick‐test methodology involves reaction of only a fraction of the total soil acidity with the buffer. Marked change in relative amounts of H ions dissociating from the soil‐SMP‐buffer system at soil‐buffer pH 6.9 and above accounts for relatively wide variations between buffer‐indicated and CaCO₃ incubation‐measured LR of low LR soils. Similarly, decreased reactivity of H⁺ in high organic matter soils and increased reactivity of H in acid‐leached soils cause errors in buffer‐indicated LR. Awareness of these principles helps avoid pitfalls of existing buffer methods, and has led to incorporation of the double‐buffer feature for improving the SMP method.     

Grouping Soils by Taxonomic Order to Improve Lime Recommendations

The success of a liming program is dependent upon the accuracy of the lime recommendation, which in turn depends on the quality of the underlying correlations and calibrations. Because of the expense, large-scale field calibration experiments are rarely conducted. The relatively low economic returns from pastures make it even more unlikely that a calibration experiment would be conducted, especially in West Virginia. Therefore, any improvements in lime recommendations have to be made from lime correlations. Moreover, it is unlikely that a single lime correlation can accurately identify appropriate lime rates for all soils. Hence, the objectives of this study were to improve the accuracy of lime recommendations by using quick tests that account for soil order and to develop lime correlations for acidic pasture soils of West Virginia. Twenty-five surface soil samples (0–7.5 cm) from the three major soil orders in the state (Alfisols, Inceptisols, Ultisols) were collected, most in cooperation with state soil scientists. Standard procedures for the determination of lime requirements by the Adams–Evans buffer (AEB), Mehlich single buffer (MB), and Shoemaker–McLean–Pratt single buffer methods (SMPB) were used. Statistically significant improvements in lime recommendations for target pH values of 6.5 and 5.5 were achieved by accounting for soil order. Mehlich single buffer recommendations were better for Alfisols and Ultisols than for Entisols to achieve pH 6.5. Lime correlations were developed for all three chemical buffers by multiple regression where the independent variables were target pH and soil-buffer pH. The AEB predicted lime rates better for target pH 5.5.     

Tillage,lime, and poultry litter effects on plant concentrations of zinc,manganese, and copper

Minimum tillage cropping systems and the use of animal manures on cropland are becoming more prevalent. An experiment was initiated to determine the effects of tillage and lime/gypsum variables on uptake of zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and copper (Cu) by corn (Zea mays L.) and to show correlations between plant uptake of these metals and soil pH and Mehlich 1‐extractable soil metals where poultry litter was used as a nitrogen (N) source. Surface soil samples were taken in the spring and fall for two years from a long‐term tillage experiment that had been in place for nine years. There were two tillage treatments [conventional (CT) and no‐tillage (NT)] and six lime/gypsum treatments (control, 8,960 kg gypsum ha^‐1 every fourth year, 4,480 kg lime ha^‐1 every fourth year, and three treatments of 8,960 kg lime ha^‐1 in a four‐year period divided by application times into 1, 2, and 4 treatments). Poultry litter was applied each year of the two‐year experiment at a rate of 8.96 Mg ha^‐1 on a dry weight basis. Soil samples were analyzed for pH and Mehlich 1‐extractable Zn, Mn, and Cu, and plant tissue (small plant, ear leaf, stalk, and grain) was analyzed for Zn, Mn, and Cu concentrations. Lime treatments resulted in lower Zn in the small plant and ear leaf for CT, but not for NT. Plant Mn was decreased by lime and gypsum rates for small plant, ear leaf, stalk and grain for both years for CT and NT. Correlations for plant Zn versus soil pH were generally non‐significant, except for one year for ear leaf Zn (R=‐0.413**). Correlations for soil pH and plant tissue Cu were all nonsignificant. Correlations for plant Mn and soil pH were strong with R values over 0.80. Plant Mn response to treatments was found at a pH range of 4.2 to 5.8 for ear leaf and pH 5.2 to 6.2 for stalks. Plant Mn and Zn versus Mehlich 1‐extractable soil Mn and Zn, respectively, were negative. This response was possibly due to oxidation‐reduction and non‐incorporation of the lime for Mn and non‐incorporation of the lime for Zn. Also, the poultry litter was high in Zn (447 mg kg^‐1), which could have masked pH effects. It was concluded that soil sampling for plant micronutrients for NT, especially where a waste material high in micronutrients is applied, can give erratic and even erroneous results. However, lime and tillage treatments had a predictable effect on micronutrient uptake as related to soil pH.     

Effect of Liming on the Plant Availability and Distribution of Zinc and Copper among Soil Fractions

Abstract

Information on the redistribution of applied micronutrients into different fractions as a result of lime application is important to predict plant accumulation of nutrients and to select appropriate chemical extraction procedures for evaluation of micronutrient availability. The present work was carried out to study the influence of liming on the availability and redistribution of zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) among soil fractions. Additionally, the effect of liming was evaluated on the recovery of these micronutrients by different chemical extractants (Mehlich‐1, Mehlich‐3, and diethylenetriaminepentaacetate (DTPA), which were correlated with Zn and Cu concentrations in corn (Zea mays L.) plants and soil fractions (exchangeable, organic matter, amorphous iron oxides, and crystalline iron oxides). The results showed that Zn added to soil samples that did not receive lime was retained mainly in the exchangeable and organic matter fractions. The liming resulted in distribution of Zn into iron oxides and as a result decreased the plant accumulation of Zn. Mehlich‐3 was the most efficient extractant to predict the plant accumulation of Zn in the acid soils, whereas DTPA was the most efficient in the limed soils. The oxide crystalline fraction was the major fraction responsible for retaining Cu in the soils. However, Cu added to soil was distributed mainly into organic matter. Mehlich‐3 was the most suitable extractant for predicting the bioavailability of Cu in limed or unlimed soils.     

Distribution and Availability of Zinc and Copper in Benchmark Soils of Pernambuco State,Brazil

Abstract

The benchmark soils collection of Pernambuco state contain 13 of the 14 soil orders of the Brazilian System of Soil Classification. Thus, information on zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) status in such soils is useful as a reference of micronutrient distribution and availability in a representative set of Brazilian soils. The present work was performed to assess Zn and Cu distribution into operationally defined fractions of benchmark soils of Pernambuco state. In addition, chemical extractants, with contrasting chemical properties, were used to assess the availability of these micronutrients to relate such values with fertility guidelines concentrations and with the fractions defined by the sequential extraction. The results demonstrated that the organic matter was the most important fraction retaining Zn and Cu in the studied soils, as indicated by the sequential extraction. The Zn availability in the majority of the soils (90% of the samples) is sufficient to meet the requirement of the major field crops, although the available Cu concentrations are below the critical levels for plant growth in 46% of the analyzed samples. Mehlich‐1 extractant appeared to be the most efficient in predicting the availability of Zn in the soils because of its better correlation with exchangeable and organic fractions. DTPA and Mehlich‐3 were the most efficient extractants for the evaluation of Cu availability, as suggested by the better correlation with organic matter, which is the main pool of available Cu in the soils.     

Evaluation of three calcium extractants for coastal plain soils

Abstract

Mehlich 1‐Ca is used as an index to predict the Ca requirement for peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) fruit development in major peanut growing states. Recently, some concern has been raised about the inadequacy of Mehlich 1 extractable Ca for that purpose. Possible use of alternative extractants for soil Ca has been suggested. In this study, relationships among Mehlich 1, 0.2 M NH₄Cl and 0.01 M NaNO₃ extractable Ca were examined in several Coastal Plain soils to which gypsum or lime had been applied. Variability in extractable Ca was much greater following lime treatment than following gypsum treatment. In Bonifay soil, the quantity of Ca extractable by the three extractants was similar in a gypsum treatment, but in a lime treatment (at an application rate equivalent to the gypsum treatment) Mehlich 1‐Ca was 2 and 5‐fold greater than NH₄Cl‐ and NaNO₃‐Ca, respectively. In Greenville soil, Mehlich 1‐Ca was 3 to 4‐fold greater than NaNO₃‐Ca regardless of gypsum or lime amendment.

For soil samples from a field experiment on Lakeland sand, where lime or gypsum was applied prior to planting, Mehlich 1‐Ca was 7.5 and 2.2‐fold greater than NaNO₃‐Ca for the lime and gypsum treatments, respectively. Greater variability in Mehlich 1‐Ca in lime than in gypsum treatments was due to possible inclusion of undissolved limestone in the soil samples, resulting in overestimation of Ca available for peanut fruits. Mehlich 1‐Ca appears to be an adequate index of soil Ca for prediction of supplemental Ca requirement for peanut if lime has not been applied or has been applied well in advance of planting, thus minimizing the inclusion of undissolved limestone with the soil sample taken from the fruiting zone (0–8 cm depth) 10–14 d after planting.