An evaluation through lactating cattle of a bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage

Three silages were prepared from herbage treated with either an inoculant (Ecosyl, Imperial Chemical Industries plc) at 3.21 t^?1, formic acid (850 g kg^?1, Add F BP Chemicals International Ltd) at 2·3 1 t^?1, or no additive (control). The herbage used was the first regrowth from perennial ryegrass swards. It was ensiled unwilted, and had mean dry matter and water soluble carbohydrate concentrations at ensiling of 154 and 24·1 g kg^?1 respectively. Time course studies showed only minor effects of additive treatment on fermentation patterns within the silo and all three silages had good fermentations. Over an 88 d feeding period, commencing on day 7 of lactation, forty-eight British Friesian cows were used to evaluate the silages in a three-treatment, randomized-block design experiment. The animals were stalled individually, offered the silages ad libitum, and in addition received 5 kg d^?1 of a supplement containing 196 g kg^?1 crude protein. On the basis of the data recorded during the final 28 d on treatment the animals receiving the inoculant-treated silage consumed 12 and 10% more silage dry matter and produced 2·1 and 2·3 kg d^?1 more milk than those given the control and formic acid-treated silages respectively. Over the total experimental period the milk yields were 1957, 1894 and 2094 (±41·3) kg for animals receiving the control, formic acid- and inoculant-treated silages respectively. Animals offered the formic acid treated silage produced milk of significantly higher fat concentration than those given the other two silages. Total ration digestibility studies, conducted with three cows per treatment, indicated no significant differences in digestibility coefficients, nitrogen utilization or metabolizable energy concentrations of the three treatment diets. It is concluded that the higher milk yield recorded with the inoculant-treated silage, and the higher milk fat concentration with the formic acid-treated silage, over that obtained with the control silage, were due to the increases in ME intake of 5 and 16 MJ d^?1 for the formic acid and inoculant-treated silages respectively.     

An evaluation of an inoculant/enzyme preparation as an additive for grass silage for dairy cattle

Herbage from the first regrowth of perennial ryegrass-based swards was directly ensiled after treatment with a bacterial inoculant/enzyme preparation (SIL-ALL, Alltech UK) at 3·0 1 t^?1, formic acid (850 g kg^?1) at 2·59 1 t^?1 or no additive (Control). The mean dry matter (DM) and water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations of the grass were 185 and 24·0 g kg^?1 (fresh basis) respectively. Lactic acid concentrations after ensiling increased at a lower rate in formic acid-treated herbage than with the other treatments. All silages were well preserved and formic acid-treated silage had a lower ultimate concentration of lactic acid and higher concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate. Effluent output was increased on a proportional basis by ?0·06 with formic treatment, whereas the inoculant reduced effluent output by 0·05 in comparison with the mean effluent production of the control silage. The in vivo digestibilities of the silages were determined using sheep. The digestibilities of DM, organic matter and energy were significantly higher with inoculant-treated silage than with formic acid treatment, whereas values for the control silage were intermediate. The three silages were offered ad libitum to forty dairy cows with individual recording of daily intakes for a 10-week period in a randomized block experiment with four treatments. Sixteen animals were offered the control silage with half of these offered 3 kg concentrates per day (C3) and the other half offered 7 kg concentrates per day (C7). Twelve animals were allocated to each of the additive-treated silages, with concentrates offered at 5 kg d^?1. Treatment effects on animal performance were measured in weeks 7–10. To compare animal performance for the treated silages with the control, an estimate of performance at 5 kg concentrates per day was obtained by regression using values obtained at 3 and 7 kg concentrates. In comparison with estimated silage intake for the control silage with 5 kg d^?1 concentrates, inoculant and formic acid treatment of the silages increased dry matter intake by 0·04 (P > 0·05) and 0·13 (P > 0·01) respectively. In comparison with estimated milk production and yield of fat plus protein for the control treatment with 5 kg d^?1 concentrates, neither inoculant treatment nor formic acid treatment produced any significant differences.     

An evaluation of a high-quality grass silage for milk production

Forty British Friesian cows with a mean calving date of 28 January were used in a randomized block design experiment to evaluate a high-quality grass silage for milk production. The high-quality silage was made from two consecutive cuts of a perennial ryegrass sward after regrowth intervals of 37 days, wilted to 51% dry matter, finely chopped and ensiled using 2.2 1 t^-1 (0.5 gallons per ton) of formic acid. The resulting silage had a dry matter digestibility of 72.9% and was fed ad libitum with 3.8 kg (8.4 lb) concentrates as a supplement. A medium-quality grass silage, of lower digestibility and dry matter content (70.0 and 25.4% respectively), was also fed ad libitum in addition to either 3.8, 5.7 or 7.6 kg (8.4, 12.5 or 16.7 lb) concentrates. The feeding treatments were commenced immediately after calving and were terminated on 9 April giving a mean period of 72 d on the treatments. Over the experimental period the animals on the high-quality silage consumed 15% more silage dry matter and produced 8% more milk that those on the medium-quality silage with the same level of concentrate supplementation. From the results it was estimated that 1.9 kg (4.3 lb) of additional concentrates would be required with the medium-quality silage to give an equivalent milk output to that achieved with the high-quality silage. Milk composition, liveweight change, ration digestibility and nitrogen balance data are also presented.     

Effectiveness of cattle slurry as a sulphur source for grass cut for silage

Three trials were carried out in separate years during 1987–89 to investigate the effectiveness of cattle slurry as a source of sulphur (S) for grass cut four times per year for silage. They were located on different areas of the same field in Dorset, UK, in an area known to be sulphur deficient for intensive grass production. Yields of dry matter and S off takes in response to sulphur in slurry were investigated and compared with those from gypsum treatments supplying 0–100 or 0–75kg S ha⁻¹. Slurry was applied at two times of year, November or February, and at two rates, either alone or in combination with the two lowest rates of gypsum.
Annual increases in yield from the slurry applied in February compared with the yield when no slurry was applied were significantly related ( r ²= 0·96) to the rate of slurry sulphur applied. For applications in November, the relationship was not significant. Sulphur in slurry increased annual dry-matter yield with an average efficiency of 55% when compared with the sulphur in gypsum. The annual apparent recovery in the herbage of S from slurry was 21·8%, compared with 44·7% from the two lowest rates of gypsum.
Cattle slurry, in these and other trials in southwest England, contained on average 0·35 kg S m⁻³ and, at rates currently applied in farming practice or likely to be applied in the future, would be insufficient to satisfy annual requirements for silage in sulphur-deficient areas.     

A further study on the evaluation through lactating cattle of a bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage

An experiment is described in which three silages were prepared from herbage treated with either a bacterial inoculant (Ecosyl, Imperial Chemical Industries plc) at 2-71 t^?1, formic acid (850 g kg^?1, Add-F, BP Chemicals International Ltd.) at 2-21 t^?1, or no additive (control). The herbage (second regrowth from perennial ryegrass swards), was ensiled unwilted, and had mean dry matter (DM) and water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations at ensiling of 186 and 34-1 g kg^?1 respectively. The resulting silages were all well preserved and had only minor chemical differences. Thirty lactating British Friesian cows were subjected to a 21 d standardization period and were then offered the three silages for 21 d in a randomized-block design experiment. The animals were stalled individually, offered the silages ad libitum and in addition received 5 kg d^?1 of a supplement containing 198 g crude protein kg DM^?1. The mean silage DM intake, milk yields and milk fat concentrations during the final 7 d on treatment were 8-44, 8-62 and 887 kg d^?1; 238, 230 and 25-1 kg d^?1; and 368, 400 and 366 g kg^?1 for the control, formic acid- and inoculant-treated silages respectively. Following the feeding trial, six cows per treatment were subdivided to provide three animals which were offered silage alone, and three offered silage plus 5 kg d-’supplement. Rumen samples taken after 21 d on these treatments indicated no effect of the inoculant on ruman volatile fatty acid proportions, whereas the use of formic acid resulted in increases in both acetate and butyrate concentrations. The results from this study support that of the earlier work that this particular inoculant, when used at ensiling, can considerably improve animal performance over that achieved with both untreated and formic acid-treated silages.     

The effect of frequency of harvesting grass for silage on the intake and performance of beef cattle

Two randomized-block experiments were conducted to examine the effects of frequency of harvesting grass for silage on the intake and performance of beef cattle. In both experiments swards of S24 perennial ryegrass were harvested at 63-, 49- and 38-d intervals throughout the growing season. Grass harvested before and after 10 July was ensiled separately and termed spring and autumn silage respectively. In Experiment 1 the silages were offered ad libitum either unsupplemented or supplemented with 2 kg barley per head daily to eighty-four Hereford-cross weaned, single-suckled steer calves of mean initial live weight 284 kg, in a 3 × 2 × 2 factorial design. Silage dry matter (DM) intakes and liveweight gains for the silages harvested at 63-, 49- and 38-d intervals were 4.80, 0.72; 4.49,0.76; and 4.62,0.78 kg d⁻¹ for the spring silages and 4.69, 0.67; 4.59, 0.85; and 4.55,0.86 kg d⁻¹ for the autumn silages respectively. There was no significant interaction between frequency of harvesting and concentrate supplementation. In Experiment 2 the silages were offered ad libitum and unsupplemented to forty-two Hereford-cross weaned, single-suckled steer calves of mean initial live weight 240 kg, and forty-two Hereford-cross store cattle of mean initial live weight 356 kg, in a 3 × 2 × 2 factorial design. Silage DM intakes and liveweight gains for the silages harvested at 63-, 49- and 38-d intervals were 4.94,0.49; 5.69,0.80; and 619,0.93 kg d⁻¹ for the spring silages and 5.50, 0.61; 5.57, 0.72; and 505, 0.65 kg d⁻¹ for the autumn silages respectively. There were no significant interactions between frequency of harvesting and type of animal. It is concluded that a cutting interval of 49 d commencing on 21 May is likely to be optimum for this type of sward except under exceptional weather conditions.     

The effects of incorporating small quantities of straw in grass/grass silage-based diets for dairy cows

Two studies were conducted to examine the effects of incorporating small quantities of straw in the diets of dairy cows. In Experiment 1, forty Holstein Friesian dairy cows were used in a 2 × 4 factorial design experiment, with factors examined consisting of two parities (primiparous and multiparous animals) and four levels of straw inclusion in the diet (0, 0·08, 0·16 and 0·24 of forage dry matter). The basal forage offered in this study was grass silage, and the primiparous and multiparous animals were supplemented with 9·0 and 11·0 kg concentrate d^–1 respectively. In Experiment 2, forty‐eight Holstein Friesian dairy cows were used in a 2 × 3 factorial design experiment, with factors examined consisting of two basal forage types (grass silage and zero‐grazed grass) and three levels of straw inclusion (0, 1·0 and 2·0 kg d^–1). All animals were offered 7·0 kg d^–1 of a concentrate supplement. Both experiments were partially balanced changeover designs, consisting of two, 4‐week periods. In Experiment 1, the total dry‐matter intake followed a significant quadratic relationship (P < 0·05), increasing with low levels of straw inclusion and decreasing at higher levels of inclusion. With increasing levels of straw inclusion, there was a linear decline in milk yield (P < 0·001) and milk protein concentration (P < 0·05), but milk fat concentration was unaffected (P > 0·05). In Experiment 2, the effect of straw inclusion on total dry‐matter intake was quadratic (P < 0·001), with intakes being maximum at the 1·0‐kg level of straw inclusion. Milk yield exhibited a linear decrease (P < 0·001) with increasing level of straw inclusion. Milk fat concentration was lowest at the 1·0 kg rate of straw inclusion (P < 0·05), but milk protein concentration was unaffected by straw inclusion. There were no significant interactions between basal forage type and level of straw inclusion for any of the variables examined (P > 0·05). Despite small increases in total dry‐matter intake at a low level of straw inclusion, there was no evidence that straw inclusion improved either nutrient utilization or animal performance. The reduction in milk yield observed with straw inclusion reflects, to a large extent, a reduction in metabolizable energy intake.     

A comparison of unwilted and wilted grass silages offered to beef cattle without and with monensin sodium

A randomized block experiment was conducted to compare unwilted and wilted grass silages and the effects of the feed additive monensin sodium on the silage intake and performance of finishing beef cattle. Two regrowths from a predominantly perennial ryegrass (cv. S24) sward were ensiled either without wilting or after field wilting for 3 d (dry matter (DM) concentrations 161 and 266 g kg⁻¹ respectively). Both silages were treated with formic acid (2·6 and 30 litre t⁻¹ respectively) and were well preserved. The silages were offered ad libitum to forty-eight Charolais-cross cattle (thirty-two steers and sixteen heifers, mean initial live weight 351 kg) for 145 d. All animals received 2·2 kg concentrates per head daily and half of those on each silage treatment received in addition 200 mg monensin sodium per head daily. Silage DM intake was 5.04, 504. 5·48, 5·63 ± 0.134 kg d^−l; fasted liveweight gain was 0·69, 0·77. 0·64 and 0·73 ± 0.033 kg d^−l and carcass gain was 0·47, 0·50, 0·40 and 0·45 ± 0·020 kg d⁻¹ for the unwilted silage without and with monensin and the wilted silage without and with monensin respectively. It is concluded that wilting grass of low DM concentration for 3 d prior to ensiling reduced the performance of finishing beef cattle below that obtained from well-preserved unwilted silage in spite of a higher DM intake being achieved with the wilted silage. The inclusion of monensin sodium in a silage-based diet increased performance without significantly affecting feed intake.     

Prevention of damage to grass swards from applications of silage effluent by neutralization or dilution of effluent acids

Estimates of the total acidity of silage effluent from a range of first-cut silages varied from 1025 to 21,125 mg Ca CO₃ per l with a weighted mean of 8817 mg l^-1. Quick-lime (CaO), hydrated lime [Ca(OH)₂] or caustic soda (NaOH) were found to be effective neutralizing agents when thoroughly mixed with the effluent. Results from seven field-plot experiments carried out between 1973 and 1977 involving application of silage effluent to grass swards are reported. Leaf scorch occurred when silage effluent with a total acidity equivalent to more than 6000 mg CaCO₃ per l was applied at rates exceeding 50 m³ ha^-1 to swards with several weeks regrowth. Scorch was most severe when applications were made during periods of dry sunny weather and to mechanically damaged swards. In these conditions reducing the total acidity to below 2000 mg CaCO₃ per l by neutralization or dilution allowed rates of over 100 m³ ha^-1 to be applied without harmful effects.
Acid neutralization was found to be unnecessary when silage effluent was applied to recently cut swards. Here rates of up to 150 m³ ha^-1 were applied without adverse effects and generally resulted in increased grass growth.     

A comparison of grass/white clover and grass silages offered to dairy cows as the sole feed

Two diets were compared: perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.) silage and perennial ryegrass/white clover ( Trifolium repens L.) silage, in each case fed ad libitum , without supplementation, to lactating dairy cows. The comparison was made with silages cut on each of four dates. The crops were wilted to a dry matter content of at least 256g kg^-1 and no additives were used.
The grass/clover silages were well preserved at all four cuts. The grass was well preserved at three cuts, but, at a May cut, the grass silage was less well preserved and less digestible than the grass/clover silage. When the May silages were fed, milk yield was higher with grass/clover than with grass. Taking the experiment as a whole, however, milk yield and composition were similar on the two diets. The grass/clover silages had a lower proportion of cell wall and their intake by dairy cows was consistently higher than that of the grass silages.
It is concluded that perennial ryegrass/white clover crops can be ensiled successfully and fed successfully, with high intake, to lactating dairy cows, but it should not be assumed that cows will give more milk than when fed equivalent all-grass silage.     

Impact of grass silage quality on greenhouse gas emissions from dairy and beef production

High‐quality grass silages may represent a mitigation option by reducing enteric methane production and by increasing productivity, thus reducing greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product (emission intensity). Two previous studies found considerable effects of three different silage qualities cut at different maturity stages (very early [H1], early [H2] and normal [H3]) offered ad libitum with various levels of concentrate supplementation, on animal performances of growing/finishing bulls and dairy cows in early lactation, indicating that emission intensities may also vary. Based on results from these previous studies, the aim of this study was to estimate emission intensities for milk and beef carcasses for the included combinations of silage qualities and concentrate levels, by using the farm‐scale model HolosNor. The emissions intensities were lowest for the H1 silage, and highest for the H3 silage, independent of concentrate levels for both milk and beef. Thus, increasing concentrate levels did not compensate for lower grass silage quality. Improvements in silage quality from H3 silage to H2 is realistic and has the potential to reduce emission intensities with approximately 10% while keeping the milk yield per cow constant and reducing the use of concentrates considerably. For beef production, the potential is even larger, with a reduction in emission intensity of approximately 17%. We conclude that improving grass silage quality may be a mitigation option that will also reduce the dependence on concentrates.     

The effects of temperature on the effluent production potential of grass silage

The effects of temperature on silage effluent production were examined. In the first experiment, samples of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne ) underwent fermentation at 20°C for between 52 and 66 d. The samples were then transferred to rooms at temperatures between 5°C and 27°C. Effluent production during creep consolidation was measured. Increasing temperature resulted in a significant increase in effluent production. There was a strong linear relationship between the mechanical properties of the silage and the amount of effluent produced. In the second experiment, Italian ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum ) samples were ensiled at temperatures between 5°C and 25°C. The higher temperature treatments had faster and more extensive fermentations, and produced more effluent than the cooler temperatures. Again, there was a strong linear relationship between the mechanical properties of the silage and the amount of effluent produced. Increasing the temperature at the end of the experiment resulted in no extra effluent production from any treatment except that at 5°C. This indicated that the effects of temperature were evident only while effluent was available for release. The effects of temperature will therefore be most evident in the early stages of ensilage. In both experiments, effluent was released from the higher temperature treatments earlier. This was probably due to the effects of temperature on the viscosity of the effluent and to fermentation effects in the second experiment. In both experiments, the increase in effluent production with temperature was equivalent to the effects to be expected from decreasing the herbage dry matter concentration by between 3% and 4%.     

Intake, rumen fermentation, degradability and digestion kinetics in beef cattle offered autumn grass herbage differing in regrowth interval

The effects of a 10-d increase in regrowth interval (35 and 45 d) of a predominantly perennial ryegrass sward harvested in two periods in the autumn in Ireland on feed intake, rumen fermentation, in situ degradability and rumen digesta kinetics was examined using six ruminally cannulated Holstein–Friesian steers in three replicates of a 2 × 2 crossover design. The longer regrowth interval had a higher grass dry-matter (DM) yield of herbage by 615 kg DM ha⁻¹ and a lower crude protein (CP) concentration of herbage by 27 g kg⁻¹ DM. There was no effect of regrowth interval on DM intake, rumen pH, total volatile fatty acid concentration or the molar proportions of acetate, propionate or butyrate in the rumen but the concentration of rumen ammonia (NH₃-N) was lower on the longer regrowth interval. The longer regrowth interval had a lower apparent total tract digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), N and neutral-detergent fibre (NDF). There was no effect of regrowth interval on the in situ degradability of DM, OM, N or NDF. The passage rates ( k _p) of DM and OM were higher while the rate of digestion ( k _d) of DM and NDF was lower with the longer regrowth interval. The results indicated that, although increasing the regrowth interval by 10 d in autumn reduced the apparent digestibility of the grass herbage, there was no adverse effect on DM intake, rumen fermentation pattern or in situ rumen degradability. The reduction in rumen NH₃-N concentrations, reflecting the lower herbage CP concentration in herbage for the longer regrowth interval, may potentially reduce nitrogen excretion to the environment.     

Grass silage as a basic feed for store lambs. 2. Effect of harvesting system and chop length of grass silage on silage intake and performance of store lambs

A perennial ryegrass sward was cut at a leafy stage of growth and harvested with different harvesters to produce silages differing in chop length to evaluate the effect of silage chop length on silage intake and on the performance of store Iambs when silage was fed as the sole diet. The silage was harvested in late May either as long silage (L), single-chopped (S). double-chopped (D). long precision-chopped (LP) or medium precision-chopped (MP) silage with (he appropriate machinery. The silages were treated with formic acid at 2.5 1 t^?1. were well preserved (pH 3.7–3.8) and were of high dry-matter digestibility [749–810 g DMD kg^?1 dry-matter (DM)]. The silages were fed ad libitum as the sole diet to Suffolk crossbred store lambs over a period of 11 weeks. Silage intake and lamb performance progressively increased as silage chop length declined from 32.4 cm (L) to 6.8 cm (MP). Silage intakes were 572, 661, 750, 893 and 1129 (± 21) g DM d^?1 for silages L, S, D, LP and MP respectively. The corresponding daily liveweight gains were -3, 40, 53, 85 and 151 (± 7.6) g d^?l. Similar increases in empty body weight gain and carcass weight gain were obtained as silage chop length declined. Rumen retention time (RRT), estimated from the rumen contents of the lambs at slaughter and their silage intake in the week before slaughter, was much shorter for silages LP and MP compared with silages L or S. Silage intake was negatively related to RRT(b= -24.5 ± 6.1 gDM h^?l RRT). The results of this study showed that high intakes of grass silage and liveweight gains were achieved when grass was cut at a leafy stage of growth and harvested with a precision-chop harvester set to produce a moderate chop length (7 cm). The feeding of long or flail-chopped silages resulted in lower intakes and lower liveweight gains.     

Maize silage with a non-protein nitrogen additive as feed for autumn-calving cows

Maize silages made in October were fed to forty-three autumn-calving cows during a 20-week winter feeding trial. The control silage received no additive whereas a non-protein nitrogen (NPN) additive was applied to the other silage at harvest time. The four experimental feeding treatments were: A, maize silage + 6 kg d^?1 barley; B, maize silage with NPN + 6 kg d^?1 barley; C, maize silage + 5 kg d^?1’barley + 1 kg d^?1 extracted decorticated groundnut cake; D, maize silage with NPN. The mean daily milk yields of cows on the treatments were 14.7, 15.1, 15.3 and 15.0 kg respectively. All cows received maize silage ad libitum. There were no significant differences in milk yield but the milk produced by the cows on treatment D had significantly lower concentrations of milk fat, protein and solids-not-fat when compared to the other three treatments. The cows on treatment D had a negative liveweight change which was significantly different (P < 0.05) from those of the cows on treatments B and C.     

Effect of microbial inoculants on the nutritive value of corn silage for beef cattle

This study investigated the effect of a new microbial inoculant product on the composition and nutritive value of corn silage in big silo over one year that used beef cattle. Six Holstein beef steer (BW = 225 +/- 17) were allotted to 2 x 2 repeated Latin square design at two 21 days periods (adaptation, 14 days and sample collection, 7 days) for evaluation the effect of microbial inoculation on the composition and nutritive value of corn silage for beef cattle. Two treatments, forages were untreated or treated at ensiling with Lactobacillus plantarum and Propionibacterium acidipropionici silage inoculants. After 45 days from ensiling, the ration that contained 94.5 and 5, 0.2, 0.2, 0.1% of DM silage and ground barely, mineral-vitamin, dicalcium phosphate, salt, respectively, were offered for free choice consumption. Treatment with Lactobacillus plantarum and Propionibacterium acidipropionici inoculant increased daily dry matter intake and subsequently NDF, ether extract, crude protein and ash. Apparent digestibility of DM and nutrients were significantly increased by microbial inoculation. Microbial inoculation can improve the nutritive value of corn silage for beef cattle.     

Fermentation patterns of small-bale silage and haylage produced as a feed for horses

The fermentation quality of small‐bale silage and haylage for feeding to horses in Sweden, and using a conventional high‐density hay baler, was investigated in two experiments. Treatments studied were use of additives (inoculants containing lactic acid bacteria and a chemical additive consisting of hexamethylenetetramine, sodium nitrate, sodium benzoate and sodium propionate), the influence of dry‐matter (DM) content of wilted herbage and the effect of number of stretch film layers on fermentation pattern and aerobic stability. All silages and haylages were made from predominantly Timothy swards and were well fermented as indicated by low levels of ammonia and butyric acid. Values of pH were higher and concentrations of organic acids were lower in haylages than in the silages. This was not considered to be indicative of a poor fermentation in the haylage but of a restricted fermentation due to the high DM content of the herbage. The additives enhanced aerobic storage stability because of inhibition of mould growth. The only statistically significant effect of varying the number of stretch film layers was a higher content of CO₂ inside the bales when ten layers of stretch film were applied compared with six layers.     

The influence of grass and maize silage quality on apparent diet digestibility, metabolizable energy concentration and intake of finishing beef cattle

The effects of offering a range of grass silages and mixtures of grass and maize silages on the intake of beef cattle were studied. Four grass silages (GS1, GS2, GS3 and GS4) were used. Grass silage 1 was ensiled from a second regrowth in mid‐late September and treated with an inoculant additive. Grass silages 2, 3 and 4 were ensiled, without additive, from a primary regrowth harvested in early July, late May and mid‐June respectively. Wilting periods were 8, 30, 36 and 36 h for GS1, GS2, GS3 and GS4 respectively. Grass silages 1, 2 and 3 were precision chopped and ensiled in bunker silos, while GS4 was ensiled in round bales. The DM content (g kg^?1) and starch concentration (g kg^?1 DM) of the three maize silages (MS1, MS2 and MS3) used were 256 and 128, 256 and 184, and 402 and 328 for MS1, MS2 and MS3 respectively. Seventy‐two Charolais and Limousin cross‐bred steers were used in a changeover design with two 4‐week periods. The study consisted of sixteen treatments incorporating the four grass silages fed alone and with the three maize silages arranged as a 4 × 4 factorial design. The grass silage and maize silage mixtures were offered in a ratio of 0·60:0·40 (DM basis) once daily using individual Calan gates. All silages were offered ad libitum with 3 kg per head per day of a concentrate supplement. Dry matter and metabolizable energy (ME) intakes were highest with diets based on grass silage GS4 compared with diets containing the other grass silages. Metabolizable energy intakes of diets containing no maize silage, and those based on MS1 and MS2, were similar (P > 0·05) but lower than that of diets containing MS3. Only limited increases were found in DM and ME intakes with the inclusion of maize silage in grass silage‐based diets while offering high‐quality grass silage (assessed in terms of DM content, and fibre and N concentrations) promoted high voluntary intakes.     

The nutritional evaluation of Italian ryegrass cultivars fed as silage to sheep and cattle

Three feeding trials with big bale silage were carried out to determine whether previously established intake differences between artificially dried Italian ryegrass cultivars could be repeated under differing conditions of food preparation and presentation. The silage was prepared in 2 consecutive years from the same field crop and fed to groups of cattle in both years. The second year silage was also fed to sheep indoors. All animals were fed ad libitum and the voluntary intakes recorded for groups of cattle and individual sheep. Chewing activity was also recorded on all groups of sheep.
The chemical composition of the two cultivars as fresh grass was similar in 1984 but there were small differences in 1983 with Tarquin showing slightly higher organic matter digestibility (DOMD) and lower dry matter and water-soluble carbohydrate compared to RvP. The only consistent differences in silage composition between cultivars was a slightly higher level of modified acid detergent (MAD) fibre in RvP compared to Tarquin. Despite these small differences the voluntary intake of cattle fed Tarquin was 19% higher than RvP in the first year and 35% in the second, while sheep showed a similar difference of 40% with the second year silage.
Recording of jaw activity with sheep showed that animals spent 40% more time eating and 27% more time ruminating RvP than Tarquin per unit of food eaten. This suggested that the intake differences, which were independent of digestibility, were related to the physical resistance of the feed to breakdown by chewing. These differences depend on the structural characteristics of the plants and were associated with differences in leaf/stem ratios and MAD-fibre content. These are less likely to be affected by the method of conservation or feed presentation and, although the degree of difference between the cultivars changed with the different procedures, the inherently higher intake of Tarquin persisted.     

Grass silage as a basic feed for store lambs. 1. Effect of wilting, chop length and stage of maturity of grass silage on intake and performance of store lambs

Two experiments were carried out with grass silages cut at a leafy (Experiment 1) and a more mature (Experiment 2) stage of growth to evaluate the effect of wilting and chop length on silage intake and performance of store lambs. In each experiment, the herbage was cut with a rotary mower and was either ensiled within 24 h as unwilled silage (U) or wilted for 1–3 d (W). Each silage type was harvested with either a double-chop harvester (D) or a precision-chop harvester (P). All silages were treated with formic acid at 3 1 t^?1 and were well preserved. The silages were fed ad libitum to Suffolk crossbred store lambs (twenty-four lambs per treatment) without any supplement over a period of 8 or 9 weeks. Wilting of the silages had little effect on silage intake (797 vs. 809g dry matter (DM) d^?1) or on lamb performance in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, wilting of the D silage increased silage DM intake (589 vs. 534 g DM d^?1; +10%) and reduced the extent of liveweight losses. Wilting of the P silage reduced silage intake (770 vs. 791g DM d^?1; -3%) and reduced liveweight gains. In Experiment 1 intakes of the D silages were 650–667g DM d^?1 and just maintained lamb live weights. Intakes of the P silages were 39–49% higher than the D silages (927–968 g DM d^?1) and increased liveweight gains. In Experiment 2 intakes of the D silages were 534–589 g DM d^?1 and resulted in a loss in lamb live weight. Precision-chopping increased silage intakes by 31–48% (770–791 DM d^?1)in Experiment 2 and improved lamb liveweight gains. Lamb performance was higher on the UP silage than on the WP silage. The rumen retention lime (RRT), estimated from the rumen contents of the lambs at slaughter and their silage intake before slaughter, was much shorter for the lambs fed on the P silages (12.6–20.6 h) than those fed on the D silages (21.4–29.3 h) in each experiment. Silage intake and liveweight gain were positively related to silage in vivo DM digestibility (DMD), whereas RRT was negatively related to DMD. However, there were distinct differences between the P and D silages in the elevation and, to a lesser extent, in the slope of the regression lines, indicating that intake of D silage was limited by factors other than the digestibility of the silage The results of this study show that the chop length of grass silage had a far greater effect on intake and on lamb performance than silage digestibility, whereas wilting had little or no effect.