Induction of ovulation in anestrous mares with pulsatile administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone

Four seasonally anestrous mares (Standardbred), housed under a nonstimulatory photoperiod of 8 hours light:16 hours dark, were administered gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in a pulsatile pattern (50 or 250 micrograms of GnRH/hour) for 8 to 18 days during February and March 1985. Treatment with GnRH, irrespective of dose or month, induced an increase in serum luteinizing hormone from a mean pretreatment value typical of anestrus (0.58 +/- 0.02 ng/ml +/- SE) to 10.84 +/- 1.27 ng/ml on day 8 of GnRH treatment. Ovulation in the 4 mares occurred 8.8 +/- 0.7 days after the initiation of pulsatile GnRH administration. In each instance, ovulation was followed by a functional corpus luteum, as indicated by a luteal phase (defined as the number of days on which serum levels of progesterone were greater than 1.0 ng/ml) which lasted 14.5 +/- 0.6 days. These results indicate that infusion of GnRH in a pulsatile pattern is effective in inducing follicular development and ovulation in anestrous mares in the absence of a stimulatory photoperiod.     

Gonadotropin response by postpartum mares to gonadotropin-releasing hormone

We hypothesized that the LH response to GnRH would be greater as the interval from foaling increases, whereas the FSH response would decrease, and that corpus luteum function after the first ovulation would be similar to that after the second ovulation. At parturition, mares were assigned to receive GnRH (2 micrograms/kg) intravenously on 1) d 3 postpartum (n = 6); 2) d 6 postpartum (n = 6); 3) d 1 of first postpartum estrus (foal estrus) and again on d 1 of second postpartum estrus (n = 8). Blood was collected through an indwelling cannula at -2, -1 and 0 h relative to GnRH stimulation (basal concentrations) and at .25, .5, .75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 and 4.0 h post-GnRH. Samples were assayed for concentrations of LH and FSH. Basal concentrations of LH were lower (P less than .05) for mares given GnRH on d 3 postpartum than for mares on d 1 of foal estrus. A rise in concentrations of LH was noted within 30 min in all groups, but the response to GnRH on d 1 of the first estrus was less (P less than .05) than on d 1 of second postpartum estrus. As the interval from parturition increased, the amount of LH secreted in response to GnRH increased. The maximum response to GnRH was greater (P less than .05) during d 1 of the first estrus than on d 3 or 6 postpartum and was greater on d 1 of cycle 2 than on d 1 of cycle 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pulsatile administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to gilts actively immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone

Sexually mature gilts (n = 20) were actively immunized against GnRH. Primary and booster immunizations of GnRH conjugated to bovine serum albumin induced production of antibodies in all gilts. Nineteen of the gilts became acyclic with suppressed concentrations of gonadotropins and estradiol. Intravenous challenges with 100 micrograms GnRH and 5 micrograms D-(Ala6, des-Gly-NH2(10)) ethylamide GnRH (a GnRH agonist that did not cross-react with antibodies produced by the gilts) caused release of LH and FSH, indicating maintenance of secretory capacity of pituitary gonadotropes in the immunized animals. Gilts were given 100 ng GnRH agonist at 2-h intervals for 72 h (n = 4) or 144 h (n = 10) or did not receive agonist (n = 5). Blood samples were taken every 6 h, and detectable concentrations of LH were observed in 42% and 52% of samples taken from gilts treated with or without agonist. In contrast, serum concentrations of FSH and estradiol were undetectable. Reproductive tracts and anterior pituitaries were taken from gilts at the conclusion of pulsatile administration of GnRH agonist or at 144 h for controls. Pituitary concentration of LH and FSH, uterine wet and dry weight, and size of the uterus were similar among groups. Paired ovarian weights for treated gilts pulsed with GnRH agonist for 72 h were heavier (P less than .05); however, ovaries from all immunized gilts were atrophied without follicular structures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Induction of ovulation and multiple ovulations in seasonally anovulatory and ovulatory mares with an equine pituitary extract

A crude equine pituitary ethanol extract (EE) was used to induce single and miltiple ovulations in seasonally anovulatory pony mares 3-15 years of age. 12 mares were injected daily for 14 days with EE; 6 of the EE-treated mares were also treated with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and 6 control mares received saline vehicle only. In a 2nd experiment designed to determine if EE treatment could induce multiple ovulations in seasonally ovulatory mares, 7 mares were treated during diestrus, 7 mares were treated beginning on Day 1 of estrus, and 7 remained untreated. The results of experiment 1 confirmed that EE treatment can induce ovulation in mares during the anovulatory season, that the timing of ovulation can be improved with HCG, and that ova from induced ovulations are fertilizable. Results of experiment 2 demonstrated that EE treatment can induce follicular activity and multiple ovulations during the ovulatory season.     

The effect of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone and estradiol administration on luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations in pituitary stalk-sectioned ovariectomized pony mares

Hourly pulses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or bi-daily injections of estradiol (E2) can increase luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized, anestrous pony mares. However, the site (pituitary versus hypothalamus) of positive feedback of estradiol on gonadotropin secretion has not been described in mares. Thus, one of our objectives involved investigating the feedback of estradiol on the pituitary. The second objective consisted of determining if hourly pulses of GnRH could re-establish physiological LH and FSH concentrations after pituitary stalk-section (PSS), and the third objective was to describe the declining time trends of LH and FSH secretion after PSS. During summer months, ovariectomized pony mares were divided into three groups: Group 1 (control, n = 2), Group 2 (pulsatile GnRH (25 μg/hr), n = 3), and Group 3 (estradiol (5 mg/12 hr), n = 3). All mares were stalk-sectioned and treatment begun immediately after stalk-section. Blood samples were collected every 30 min for 8 h on the day before surgery (DO) and 5 d post surgery (D5) to facilitate the comparison of gonadotropin levels before and after pituitary stalk-section. Additionally, jugular blood samples were collected every 12 hr beginning the evening of surgery, allowing for evaluation of the gonadotropin secretory time trends over the 10 d of treatment. On Day 10, animals were euthanized to confirm pituitary stalk-section and to submit tissue for messenger RNA analysis (parallel study). Plasma samples were assayed for LH and FSH by RIA. Mean LH secretion decreased from Day 0 to Day 5 in Groups 1 and 3, whereas LH secretion tended (P < 0.08) to decrease in Group 2 mares. On Day 5, LH was higher (P < 0.01) in Group 2 (17.26 ± 3.68 ng/ml; LSMEANS ± SEM), than either Group 1 (2.65 ± 4.64 ng/ml) or group 3 (4.28 ± 3.68 ng/ml). Group 1 did not differ from Group 3 on Day 5 (P < 0.40). Similarly, mean FSH levels decreased in all groups after surgery, yet Group 2 mares had significantly (P < 0.001) higher FSH concentrations (17.66 ± 1.53 ng/ml) than Group 1 or Group 3 (8.34 ± 1.84 and 7.69 ± 1. 63 ng/ml, respectively). Regression analysis of bi-daily LH and FSH levels indicated that the time trends were not parallel. These findings indicate: 1) Pituitary stalk-section lowered LH and FSH to undetectable levels within 5 d after surgery, 2) pulsatile administration of GnRH (25 μg/hr) maintained LH and FSH secretion, although concentrations tended to be lower than on Day 0, and 3) E2 did not stimulate LH or FSH secretion.     

Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone for hastening ovulation in transitional mares

Natural GnRH and its analog have potential for hastening ovulation in mares. A study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a GnRH agonist given either as an injectable or s.c. implant for induction of ovulation in mares. Forty-five seasonally anestrous mares (March) were assigned to one of three groups (n = 15/group): 1) untreated controls; 2) i.m. injection of the GnRH agonist buserelin at 12-h intervals (40 micrograms/injection for 28 d or until ovulation) and 3) GnRH agonist administered as a s.c. implant (approximately 100 micrograms/24 h for 28 d). Six mares per group were bled on d 0, 7, 14 and 21 after injection or insertion of implant. Samples were taken at -1, -.5 and 0 h and at .5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after GnRH. Additional daily samples were drawn for 28 d after injection or until ovulation. Samples were assayed for concentration of LH and FSH. Progesterone concentrations were determined in samples collected on d 4, 6 and 10 after ovulation. Number and size of follicles and detection of ovulation were determined by ultrasonography. Number of mares induced to ovulate within 30 d was 0 of 15, 7 of 15 and 9 of 15 for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. During treatment, follicle sizes were smaller for mares in group 3 (implant). The LH response to GnRH agonist (area under curve) was similar among groups at d 0 but was greater (P less than .05) for mares in group 3 on d 7 and 14 and groups 2 and 3 on d 21 than for controls. A similar pattern was detected for peak concentrations of LH after GnRH on d 0, 7, 14 and 21. Daily concentrations of LH remained low in untreated control mares compared with GnRH-treated mares throughout the sampling period. Concentrations of LH for mares in group 3 that ovulated were elevated greatly above those for group 2 mares, whereas concentrations of FSH were similar in both treatment groups prior to ovulation.     

The effect of estrogen, progesterone and prostaglandin F2 alpha on uterine contractions in seasonally anovulatory mares

Uterine contractions were studied in two experiments utilizing ultrasonography and seasonally anovulatory mares. A one-minute ultrasound scan was done to produce longitudinal real-time images of the uterine body and an overall uterine contractile activity score (0 = no or minimal activity to 4 = maximal activity) was assigned to each scan. In experiment 1, a two-hour uterine activity trial (one score every 10 minutes) was done in mares given a single injection of prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha group; n = 4) and in control mares (n = 4). There was no difference between the two groups over the two-hour trial (mean activity score averaged over the two-hour trial: PGF2 alpha group, 0.2; control group, 0.1). In experiment 2, 16 mares were randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) controls (corn oil vehicle), 2) 1 mg estradiol 17 beta on days 0 to 9 and 100 mg progesterone on days 10 to 20 (E2--greater than P4 group), 3) 100 mg progesterone on days 0 to 20 (P4 group), and 4) 100 mg progesterone on days 0 to 9 and 1 mg estradiol 17 beta + 100 mg progesterone on days 10 to 20 (P4--greater than E2 + P4 group). Uterine activity was assessed for each mare daily. The day by group interaction was significant. Scores for the E2--greater than P4 group were greater on days 4 to 11 (P less than .05) than for the other three groups. From day 14 to 21, scores did not differ among the three steroid-treated groups (except on day 15), but the scores averaged over each steroid-treated group were greater for each day (P less than .1 or .05) than for the controls (except on day 17).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Induction of ovulation with gonadotrophin releasing hormone and progesterone in seasonally anestrous mares

Five seasonally anestrous mares were treated with a regimen of gonadotrophin releasing hormone and progesterone in an attempt to induce estrus and ovulation. The treatment induced follicular activity and estrus in all mares. Two of the five mares ovulated but none conceived.     

Concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I and steroids in follicular fluid of preovulatory bovine ovarian follicles: effect of daily injections of a growth hormone-releasing factor analog and(or) thyrotropin-releasing hormone

To determine whether long-term administration of growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor (GRF) and(or) thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) alters ovarian follicular fluid (FFL) concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), progesterone, and estradiol (E2), and follicular growth, Friesian x Hereford heifers (n = 47; 346 +/- 3 kg) were divided into the following four groups: control (vehicle; n = 11); 1 micrograms GRF (human [Des NH2 Tyr1, D-Ala2, Ala15] GRF [1-29]-NH2).kg-1 BW.d-1 (n = 12); 1 microgram TRH.kg-1 BW.d-1 (n = 12); or GRF + TRH (n = 12). Daily injections (s.c.) continued for 86 d. On d 89, heifers that had been synchronized were slaughtered and ovaries were removed. Follicles were grouped by magnitude of diameter into the three following sizes: 1 to 3.9 mm (small, n = 55), 4.0 to 7.9 mm (medium, n = 63), and greater than or equal to 8 mm (large, n = 71). Growth hormone-releasing factor and(or) TRH did not affect (P greater than .10) IGF-I concentrations in FFL of any follicle size group. Growth hormone-releasing factor increased (P less than .06) size (means +/- pooled SE) of large follicles (14.7 vs 13.0 +/- .6 mm). Growth hormone-releasing factor also increased (P less than .05) progesterone concentrations 4.4-fold above controls in FFL of medium-sized follicles but had no effect on progesterone in FFL of the small or large follicles. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone did not alter FFL progesterone or E2 concentrations in any follicle size group. We conclude that the GRF and(or) TRH treatments we employed did not affect intra-ovarian IGF-I concentrations, but GRF may alter steroidogenesis of medium-sized follicles and growth of large follicles.     

Effect of long-term administration of human growth hormone-releasing factor and (or) thyrotropin-releasing factor on hormone concentrations in lactating dairy cows

Fifteen cows (87 +/- 8 d in lactation; 641 +/- 33 kg BW) were randomly assigned to treatment and then subjected for 182 d to daily sc injection (1000 hr), in the cervical area, of saline (control), thyrotropin-releasing factor (TRF: 1 micrograms/kg BW), growth hormone-releasing factor (1-29)NH2 (GRF; 10 micrograms/kg BW) or GRF plus TRF (10 and 1 micrograms/kg BW, respectively) according to a 2 x 2 factorial design. On days 1, 31, 88 and 179, jugular blood samples were collected from 2 hr before to 6 hr after injection. Samples were also collected for 5 consecutive days after cessation of treatment. GRF always induced growth hormone (GH) release (600 vs 7925 ng.min/ml) with augmentation of response with time (interaction GRF * day; P less than .001). TRF did not affect (P greater than .25) GH release; there was no interaction (P greater than .25) with time. There was no significant interaction (P greater than .25) between GRF and TRF on GH release. However, the amount of GH release with GRF plus TRF was always greater than with GRF alone (9419 vs 6431 ng.min/ml). TRF induced a significant release of prolactin (23769 vs 42175 ng.min/ml) but GRF reduced the amount of prolactin release on the last day of sampling. TRF induced thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) release only on the first day of injection while triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) continued to respond to TRF throughout the treatment period. Concentrations of T3 and T4 fell below control levels after cessation of TRF injection. In conclusion, GRF-induced GH release and TRF-induced Prl and thyroid hormone release were maintained over a 6-mo treatment period. TRF induced TSH release only on the first day of injection. Overall, these results raised the possibility of a direct effect of TRF on the thyroid gland.     

Effects of oral administration of levothyroxine sodium on serum concentrations of thyroid gland hormones and responses to injections of thyrotropin-releasing hormone in healthy adult mares

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of levothyroxine sodium (L-T4) on serum concentrations of thyroid gland hormones and responses to injections of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in euthyroid horses. ANIMALS: 12 healthy adult mares. PROCEDURE: 8 horses received an incrementally increasing dosage of L-T4 (24, 48, 72, or 96 mg of L-T4/d) for weeks 1 to 8. Each dose was provided for 2 weeks. Four additional horses remained untreated. Serum concentrations of total triiodothyronine (tT3), total thyroxine (tT4), free T3 (fT3), free T4 (fT4), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) were measured in samples obtained at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8; 1.2 mg of TRH was then administered i.v., and serum concentrations of thyroid gland hormones were measured 2 and 4 hours after injection. Serum reverseT3 (rT3) concentration was also measured in the samples collected at weeks 0 and 8. RESULTS: Treated horses lost a significant amount of weight (median, 19 kg). Significant treatment-by-time effects were detected for serum tT3, tT4, fT3, fT4, and TSH concentrations, and serum tT4 concentrations were positively correlated (r, 0.95) with time (and therefore dosage) in treated horses. Mean +/- SD serum rT3 concentration significantly increased in treated horses (3.06 +/- 0.51 nmol/L for week 8 vs 0.74 +/- 0.22 nmol/L for week 0). Serum tT3, tT4, fT3, and TSH concentrations in response to TRH injections differed significantly between treated and untreated horses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of levothyroxine sodium increased serum tT4 concentrations and blunted responses toTRH injection in healthy euthyroid horses.     

Growth hormone response to a novel growth hormone-releasing tripeptide in horses: interaction with gonadotropin-releasing hormone, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, and sulpiride

A series of experiments was performed to determine the factor(s) responsible for an apparent inhibition of GH secretion in mares administered the GH secretagogue EP51389 in combination with GnRH, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), and sulpiride. Experiment 1 tested the repeatability of the original observation: 10 mares received EP51389 at 10 microg/kg BW; five received TRH (10 microg/kg BW), GnRH (1 microg/kg BW), and sulpiride (100 microg/kg BW) immediately before EP51389, and five received saline. The mixture of TRH, GnRH, and sulpiride reduced (P = 0.0034) the GH response to EP51389, confirming the inhibitory effects. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that sulpiride, a dopamine antagonist, was the inhibitory agent. Twelve mares received EP51389 as in Exp. 1; six received sulpiride before EP51389 and six received saline. The GH responses in the two groups were similar (P > 0.1), indicating that sulpiride was not the inhibitory factor. Experiment 3 tested the effects of TRH and(or) GnRH in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Three mares each received saline, TRH, GnRH, or the combination before EP51389 injection. There was a reduction (P < 0.0001) in GH response in mares receiving TRH, whereas GnRH had no effect (P > 0.1). Given those results, Exp. 4 was conducted to confirm that TRH was inhibitory in vivo as opposed to some unknown chemical interaction of the two compounds in the injection solution. Twenty mares received TRH or saline and(or) EP51389 or saline in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Injections were given separately so that the two secretagogues never came in contact before injection. Again, TRH reduced (P < 0.0001) the GH response to EP51389. In addition, TRH and EP51389 each resulted in a temporary increase in cortisol concentrations. Experiment 5 tested whether TRH would alter the GH response to GHRH itself. Twelve mares received porcine GHRH at 0.4 microg/kg BW; six received TRH prior to GHRH and six received saline. After adjustment for pretreatment differences between groups, the GHRH-induced GH response was completely inhibited (P = 0.068) by TRH. Exp. 6 was a repeat of Exp. 5, except geldings were used (five per group). Again, pretreatment with TRH inhibited (P < 0.0001) the GH response to GHRH. In conclusion, TRH inhibits the GH response not only to EP51389 but also to GHRH in horses, and in addition to its known secretagogue action on prolactin and TSH it may also stimulate ACTH at the dosage used in these experiments.     

Luteinizing hormone release after administration of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist Fertilan (goserelin) for synchronization of ovulation in pigs

The generic GnRH agonist, Fertilan (goserelin), was tested for the ability to induce an LH surge and ovulation in estrus-synchronized gilts. Three experiments were performed to 1) examine the effect of various doses of Fertilan on secretion of LH in barrows, to select doses to investigate in gilts (Exp. 1); 2) determine doses of Fertilan that would induce a preovulatory-like rise of LH in gilts (Exp. 2); and 3) determine the time of ovulation after Fertilan treatment (Exp. 3). In Exp. 1, 10 barrows were injected on d 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13 with 10, 20, or 40 microg of Fertilan; 50 microg of Gonavet (depherelin; GnRH control) or saline (negative control); and sequential blood samples were collected for 480 min. There was a dose-dependent stimulation (P < 0.05) of LH release. Maximal plasma concentrations of LH (LH(MAX)) were 2.1 +/- 0.2, 4.1 +/- 0.3, 2.6 +/- 0.4, and 3.4 +/- 0.3 ng/mL after 10, 20, and 40 microg of Fertilan and 50 microg of Gonavet, respectively, and duration of release was 78 +/- 9, 177 +/- 12, 138 +/- 7, and 180 +/- 11 min, respectively. Fertilan doses of 10 and 20 microg were deemed to be the most suitable for testing in gilts. In Exp. 2, 12 gilts received (after estrus synchronization with Regumate and eCG) injections of 10 or 20 microg of Fertilan or 50 microg of Gonavet 80 h after eCG to stimulate a preovulatory-like LH surge and ovulation. An LH surge was induced in 3 of the 4 gilts in both of the Fertilan groups and in all of the Gonavet-treated gilts. Characteristics of induced release of LH did not differ among groups: LH(MAX), 5.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 4.6 +/- 1.8 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.1 ng/mL; duration, 11.7 +/- 2.0 vs. 12.3 +/- 2.2 vs. 14.3 +/- 0.5 h; interval from GnRH injection to LH(MAX), 4.0 +/- 2.0 vs. 6.7 +/- 1.3 vs. 5.8 +/- 1.6 h. In Exp. 3, estrus-synchronized gilts were injected with 20 microg of Fertilan (n = 8) or 50 microg of Gonavet (n = 4), and the time of ovulation was determined by repeated endoscopic examination. Time of ovulation ranged from 34 to 42 h postGnRH; however, ovulation occurred earlier in the Gonavet compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). Results of these experiments indicate that 1) barrows are an appropriate model for determining GnRH doses that can be effective in inducing a preovulatory-like LH surge in females; 2) the generic GnRH agonist Fertilan, at doses of 10 to 20 microg, can stimulate an LH surge in gilts, with subsequent ovulation; and 3) Fertilan at doses of 10 and 20 microg should be examined further for use in fixed-time insemination protocols.     

Characteristics of prolactin-releasing response to salsolinol (SAL) and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in ruminants

The secretion of prolactin (PRL) is stimulated by thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), and inhibited by dopamine (DA). However, we have recently demonstrated that salsolinol (SAL), a DA-derived endogenous compound, is able to stimulate the release of PRL in ruminants. The aims of the present study were to compare the characteristics of the PRL-releasing response to SAL and TRH, and examine the relation between the effects that SAL and DA exert on the secretion of PRL in ruminants in vivo and in vitro. Three consecutive intravenous (i.v.) injections of SAL (5 mg/kg body weight (b.w.): 19.2 μmol/kg b.w.) or TRH (1 μg/kg b.w.: 2.8 nmol/kg b.w.) at 2-h intervals increased plasma PRL levels after each injection in goats (P < 0.05); however, the responses to SAL were different from those to TRH. There were no significant differences in each peak value between the groups. The rate of decrease in PRL levels following the peak was attenuated in SAL-treated compare to TRH-treated animals (P < 0.05). PRL-releasing responses to SAL were similar to those to sulpiride (a DA receptor antagonist, 0.1 mg/kg b.w.: 293.3 nmol/kg b.w.). In cultured bovine anterior pituitary (AP) cells, TRH (10⁻⁸ M) significantly increased the release of PRL following both 15- and 30-min incubation periods (P < 0.05), but SAL (10⁻⁶ M) did not increase the release during the same periods. DA (10⁻⁶ M) completely blocked the TRH-induced release of PRL for a 2-h incubation period in the AP cells (P < 0.05). Sulpiride (10⁻⁶ M) reversed this inhibitory effect but SAL (10⁻⁶ M) did not have any influence on the action of DA. These results show that the mechanism(s) by which SAL releases PRL is different from the mechanism of action of TRH. Furthermore, they also show that the secretion of PRL is under the inhibitory control of DA, and SAL does not antagonize the DA receptor's action.     

Changes in serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone following injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone during pregnancy and after parturition in mares

High concentrations of estrogens in the peripheral circulation during late gestation inhibit synthesis of LH and markedly reduce pituitary content of LH at the end of pregnancy in most domestic species. Because blood concentrations of estrogen peak shortly before mid-gestation in the mare and then gradually decrease until parturition, we hypothesized that pituitary content of LH may increase during late gestation. To test this hypothesis 10 horse mares were challenged with a maximally stimulatory dose (2 micrograms/kg) of GnRH on d 240 and 320 of gestation and d 3 after parturition. A separate group of four mares were treated with GnRH on d 2 or 3 estrus. Blood samples were collected at -2, -1, 0, .25, .5, .75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 h relative to injection of GnRH and serum was analyzed for concentration of LH and FSH. Basal serum concentration and total quantity of LH released after GnRH stimulation (assessed by determining the area under the response curve) were not different on d 240 and 320 of gestation or on d 3 after parturition (12.5 +/- 3.5, 5.7 +/- 1.5 and 29.1 +/- 12.1 ng.min/ml, respectively) and were less (P less than .05) than on d 3 of estrus (311.0 +/- 54.0 ng.min/ml). There was little difference in the basal serum concentration of FSH at any of the time points examined. In contrast, GnRH-induced release of FSH continually decreased (P less than .05) from d 240 of gestation (559.8 +/- 88.9 ng.min/ml) to d 3 of estrus (51.8 +/- 6.2 ng.min/ml).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of long-term administration of porcine growth hormone-releasing factor and(or) thyrotropin-releasing factor on growth hormone, prolactin and thyroxine concentrations in growing pigs

Long-term administration of porcine growth hormone-releasing factor (pGRF(1-29)NH2) and(or) thyrotropin-releasing factor (TRF) was evaluated on serum concentrations of growth hormone (GH) thyroxine (T4) and prolactin (PRL). Twenty-four 12-wk-old female Yorkshire-Landrace pigs were injected at 1000 and 1600 for 12 wk with either saline, pGRF (15 micrograms/kg), TRF (6 micrograms/kg) or pGRF + TRF using a 2 x 2 factorial design. Blood samples were collected on d 1, 29, 57 and 85 of treatment from 0400 to 2200. Areas under the GH, T4 and PRL curves (AUC) for the 6 h (0400 to 1000) prior to injection were subtracted from the postinjection periods (1000 to 1600, 1600 to 2200) to calculate the net hormonal response. The AUC of GH for the first 6 h decreased similarly (P less than .05) with age for all treatments. The GH response to GRF remained unchanged (P greater than .10) across age. TRF alone did not stimulate (P less than .05) GH release but acted in synergy with GRF to increase (P less than .05) GH release. TRF stimulated (P less than .001) the net response of T4 on all sampling days. Animals treated with the combination of GRF + TRF showed a decreased T4 AUC during the first 6 h on the last three sampling days. Basal PRL decreased (P less than .05) with age. Over the four sampling days, animals injected with TRF alone showed (P less than .01) a reduction (linear effect; P less than .01) followed by an increase (quadratic effect; P less than .05) in total PRL concentration after injection; however, when GRF was combined with TRF, such effects were not observed (P greater than .10). Results showed that 1) chronic injections of GRF for 12 wk sustained GH concentration, 2) TRF and GRF acted synergistically to elevate GH AUC, 3) TRF increased T4 concentrations throughout the 12-wk treatment period, 4) chronic TRF treatment decreased the basal PRL concentration and 5) chronic GRF + TRF treatment decreased the basal concentration of T4.     

Effects of thyrotropin-releasing hormone and a thyrotropin releasing hormone analog on growth and selected plasma hormones in lambs

An 8-wk growth trial was conducted to assess the effects of continuous infusion of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and an active TRH analog less than Aad-His-Pro-NH2 (the less than Aad is L-pyro-alpha-aminoadipic acid) on growth trial performance, carcass composition and hormone profiles of growing lambs. Both drugs were infused at 600 micrograms X lamb -1 X d -1 with 16 lambs/treatment. Both TRH and less than Aad-His-Pro-NH2 decreased average daily gain (ADG; P less than .01) and increased feed conversion (FC; P less than .01) compared with saline infused controls. Average daily feed intake was not altered. Carcasses of lambs given TRH or less than Aad-His-Pro-NH2 contained fewer kilograms of moisture (P less than .05) and appeared to contain fewer kilograms of protein. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone and less than Aad-His-Pro-NH2 increased thyroid gland weights (P less than .05), but pituitary gland weights were not different. Plasma thyrotropin (TSH) concentrations were increased by both drugs compared with control lambs, peaking at 4 to 7 d after initiating infusion. However, by 14 d, TSH concentrations returned to control levels. Triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) were elevated by both drugs over the entire 8-wk trial, with peak levels reached at 10 d and maintained for the duration of the study. Both TRH and less than Aad-His-Pro-NH2 increased prolactin over the entire period. Growth hormone levels were not altered by either drug. The effects of less than Aad-His-Pro-NH2 infusion on growth trial performance, carcass composition and hormone profiles of growing lambs were very similar to TRH. The negative effects of TRH and less than Aad-His-Pro-NH2 infusion on ADG, FC and carcass protein appear to be the result of elevated T3 and T4 levels.     

Treatment of anovulatory anoestrous postpartum dairy cows with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), prostaglandin F2 alpha, GnRH regimen or with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate

AIM: To compare 2 treatments for anovulatory anoestrus (AA) in postpartum dairy cows. The treatments were combinations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and prostaglandin F2 (PG) or progesterone (P4) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB). METHODS: Forty AA cows from each of 5 herds were blocked by age (2 or 2 years old) and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments. The first group (GPG) were treated with 250 mug of a GnRH analogue, gonadorelin, followed 7 days later by 15 mg of the PG analogue, luprostiol. Two days later the cows were injected with 250 mug of gonadorelin. Cows were artificially inseminated 16-24 h after the second GnRH injection. The second group (P4+ODB) were treated with an intravaginal P4 releasing device for 6 days, followed 24 h after device removal by injection of 1 mg of ODB. Cows were pregnancy tested 35-40 days after the initial insemination and twice again at 6-8 week intervals thereafter. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between P4+ODB and GPG groups in the percentage of cows submitted for insemination in the first 7 days (94.0% vs 100% for P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.3), in conception rate to first insemination within the first 7 days (43.6% vs 35.0% for P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.2), in the percentage of cows conceiving in the first 28 days of the breeding period (68.0% vs 58.3%, P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.1), or in median interval from the end of treatment to conception (20 vs 21 days; p>0.1). CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the reproductive performance of AA cows treated with either P4+ODB or GPG were detected. However, given the small number of animals enrolled, further data are required before the GPG protocol can be recommended for treatment of AA cows.