Sodium removal from a calcareous saline–sodic soil through leaching and plant uptake during phytoremediation

Saline–sodic and sodic soils are characterized by the occurrence of sodium (Na⁺) to levels that can adversely affect several soil properties and growth of most crops. As a potential substitute of cost‐intensive chemical amelioration, phytoremediation of such soils has emerged as an efficient and low‐cost strategy. This plant‐assisted amelioration involves cultivation of certain plant species that can withstand ambient soil salinity and sodicity levels. It relies on enhanced dissolution of native calcite within the root zone to provide adequate Ca²⁺ for the Na⁺ Ca²⁺ exchange at the cation exchange sites. There is a lack of information for the Na⁺ balance in terms of removal from saline–sodic soils through plant uptake and leaching during the phytoremediation process. We carried out a lysimeter experiment on a calcareous saline–sodic soil [pH of saturated soil paste (pH_s) = 7.2, electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (EC_e) = 4.9 dS m⁻¹, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) = 15.9, CaCO₃ = 50 g kg⁻¹]. There were three treatments: (1) control (without application of a chemical amendment or crop cultivation), (2) soil application of gypsum according to the gypsum requirement of the soil and (3) planting of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) as a phytoremediation crop. The efficiency of treatments for soluble salt and Na⁺ removal from the soil was in the order: gypsum ≈ alfalfa > control. In the phytoremediation treatment, the amount of Na⁺ removed from the soil through leaching was found to be the principal cause of reduction in salinity and sodicity. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Driving forces for sodium removal during phytoremediation of calcareous sodic and saline–sodic soils: a review

Abstract. Sodic and saline–sodic soils are characterized by the occurrence of sodium (Na⁺) at levels that result in poor physical properties and fertility problems, adversely affecting the growth and yield of most crops. These soils can be brought back to a highly productive state by providing a soluble source of calcium (Ca²⁺) to replace excess Na⁺ on the cation exchange complex. Many sodic and saline–sodic soils contain inherent or precipitated sources of Ca²⁺, typically calcite (CaCO₃), at varying depths within the profile. Unlike other Ca²⁺ sources used in the amelioration of sodic and saline‐sodic soils, calcite is not sufficiently soluble to effect the displacement of Na⁺ from the cation exchange complex. In recent years, phytoremediation has shown promise for the amelioration of calcareous sodic and saline–sodic soils. It also provides financial or other benefits to the farmer from the crops grown during the amelioration process. In contrast to phytoremediation of soils contaminated by heavy metals, phytoremediation of sodic and saline–sodic soils is achieved by the ability of plant roots to increase the dissolution rate of calcite, resulting in enhanced levels of Ca²⁺ in soil solution to replace Na⁺ from the cation exchange complex. Research has shown that this process is driven by the partial pressure of CO₂ (P_CO2) within the root zone, the generation of protons (H⁺) released by roots of certain plant species, and to a much smaller extent the enhanced Na⁺ uptake by plants and its subsequent removal from the field at harvest. Enhanced levels of P_CO2 and H⁺ assist in increasing the dissolution rate of calcite. This results in the added benefit of improved physical properties within the root zone, enhancing the hydraulic conductivity and allowing the leaching of Na⁺ below the effective rooting depth. This review explores these driving forces and evaluates their relative contribution to the phytoremediation process. This will assist researchers and farm advisors in choosing appropriate crops and management practices to achieve maximum benefit during the amelioration process.     

The contribution of plant roots to CO2 fluxes from organic soils

The CO₂ released in soil respiration is formed from organic matter which differs in age and stability, ranging from soluble root exudates to more persistent plant remains. The contribution of roots, a relatively fast component of soil cycling, was studied in three experiments. (1) Willows were grown in a greenhouse and CO₂ fluxes from the substrate soil (milled peat) and from control peat were measured. (2) CO₂ fluxes from various peatland sites were measured at control points and points where the roots were severed from the plants. (3) CO₂ fluxes in cultivated grassland established on peatland were measured in grassy subsites and in subsites where the growth of grass was prevented by regular tilling. The root-derived respiration followed the typical annual phenology of the vegetation, being at its maximum in the middle and late summer. All the experiments gave similar results, root-derived respiration accounting for 35–45% of total soil respiration in the middle and late summer at sites with an abundant vegetation. The root-derived respiration from the virgin peatland sites correlated well with the tree biomass, and also partly with the understorey vegetation, but in the drained sites the root effect was greater, even in the presence of less understorey vegetation than at virgin subsites.     

Leaching and reclamation of calcareous saline‐sodic soil by moderately saline and moderate‐SAR water using gypsum and calcium chloride

Lysimeter experiments were conducted with sandy‐clay‐loam soil to study the efficiency of two amendments in reclaiming saline‐sodic soil using moderately saline and SAR (sodium‐adsorption ratio) irrigation water. Gypsum obtained from industrial phosphate by‐products and reagent grade Ca chloride were applied to packed soil columns and irrigated with moderately saline (ECe = 2.16 dS m^–1), moderate‐SAR water (SAR = 4.8). Gypsum was mixed with soil prior to irrigation at application rates of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 32 Mg ha^–1, and Ca chloride was dissolved directly in leaching water at application rates of 4.25, 8.5, 12.75, 17.0, and 21.25 Mg ha^–1, respectively. The highest application rate in both amendments resulted in 96% reduction of total Na in soil. The hydraulic conductivity (HC) of soils receiving gypsum increased in all treatments. The highest HC value of 6.8 mm h^–1 was obtained in the highest application rate (32 Mg ha^–1), whereas the lowest value of 5.2 mm h^–1 was observed with the control treatment. Both amendments were efficient in reducing soil salinity and sodicity (exchangeable‐sodium percentage, ESP); however, Ca chloride was more effective than gypsum as a reclaiming material. Exchangeable Na and soluble salts were reduced with gypsum application by 82% and 96%, and by 86% and 93% with Ca chloride application, respectively. Exchangeable Ca increased with increasing amendment rate. Results of this study revealed that sodium was removed during cation‐exchange reactions mostly when the SAR of effluent water was at maximum with subsequent passage of 3 to 4 pore volumes. Gypsum efficiently reduced soil ESP, soil EC, leaching water, and costs, therefore, an application rate of 20 Mg ha^–1 of gypsum with 3 to 4 pore volumes of leaching water is recommended for reclaiming the studied soil.     

Earthworm ecosystem service and dis-service in an N-enriched agroecosystem: Increase of plant production leads to no effects on yield-scaled N2O emissions

Earthworms can enhance plant productivity by promoting nitrogen (N) mineralization in N-limited agroecosystems and may also enhance the risk of N₂O emissions and ${{\text{NO}}_3}^{-}–\text{N}$ leaching in N-enriched agroecosystems. However, direct evidence demonstrating the enhancement by earthworms of N₂O emissions and ${{\text{NO}}_3}^{-}–\text{N}$ leaching in the field is scarce, particularly in intensively managed systems. In addition, the interaction of earthworm feeding strategies and organic amendment may profoundly modulate N cycling. We examined these impacts using two earthworm species with distinct ecological strategies (epigeic Eisenia foetida and endogeic Metaphire guillemi) in combination with two manure application methods (surface mulch and incorporation into the soil) in a field experiment. Our results demonstrated that earthworm addition significantly increased the crop yield by 18%–47% and cumulative N₂O emissions by 19%–25% largely regardless of earthworm species and manure application methods, respectively. However, earthworms did not significantly increase the leachate ${{\text{NO}}_3}^{-}–\text{N}$ concentration. Earthworm-induced N₂O emissions were primarily attributed to increased soil N availability (${{\text{NO}}_3}^{-}–\text{N}$ and microbial biomass N) and carbon (C) availability (dissolved organic C). In contrast, a stepwise regression revealed that an earthworm-promoted soil macroaggregation exerted negative effects on N₂O emissions. Irrespective of earthworm species and manure application methods, earthworms had no stimulatory effects on the yield-scaled N₂O–N because the promotion of crop productivity counteracted the extent of N₂O increase. In conclusion, understanding the trade-off between earthworm services and dis-services will contribute to the development of environmentally justified soil management by allowing the full utilization of biological resources.