Comparison of a tissue-culture virus-neutralization test and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of antibodies t infectious bronchitis

Two serological tests, the virus-neutralization (VN) test in tissue culture using a tissue-cell-adapted virus and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were compared to detect antibodies against Massachusetts 41 and Connecticut 46 strains of Infectious Bronchitis Virus (IBV). The VN test was conducted in wells of microplates by the usual procedure. The two strains of IBV were adapted after 20 serial passages to induce CPE in 24 hours in chickens embryos kidney cells (CEKC). The ELISA test was carried out using partially virus following ultracentrifugation of each stain of IBV as antigen. The ELISA test detected higher geometric mean antibody titers (GMT) against both strains of IBV than did the VN test. One hundred four serum samples taken at 1, 3, 5, 9, 22, 24, and 26 weeks of age from a flock of chickens vaccinated with the Mass strain three times and the Conn strain of IBV two times during the growing period showed higher antibody titer responses to the Conn 46 than to the Mass 41 strain. Maternal antibodies in chicks one week of age were readily detected by the ELISA test, whereas low or insignificant titers were found by the VN test. Sera of vaccinated chickens collected following challenge with Mass 41 or Conn 46 strain of IBV showed that the ELISA was more sensitive and showed higher titers than did the VN test. Although the VN test showed no rise in GMT in the same sera tested with the heterologous virus, the ELISA showed a slight increase or cross-reaction. The serum samples from the unchallenged control group showed no change in GMT with either test or IBV strain.     

Detection of antibodies against serotypes 1 and 2 infectious bursal disease virus by commercial ELISA kits

Two distinct serotypes of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) are recognized in chicken and turkey flocks in the United States. Serologic testing of chicken flocks for serotype 1 viruses is routinely performed to monitor disease status and vaccination. Earlier studies indicated that enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test detects antibodies to both serotypes of the virus, while the virus neutralization (VN) test is serotype specific. It is useful to evaluate currently available commercial ELISA kits for their ability to differentiate between antibodies elicited by the two serotypes. Three trials were performed in which chickens were orally inoculated with either a high or a low dose of serotype 1 STC or serotype 2 OH strains of IBDV. Sera collected at 0, 7, 14, and 21 days from these chickens and antisera procured from naturally infected broiler (n=20) and layer (n=30) flocks were tested with five different commercial ELISA kits and by VN. All ELISA kits detected different levels of antibodies elicited against serotype 1 of the virus and moderate and high levels of antibodies against serotype 2 virus. A correlation existed between the ELISA and the VN titers of experimentally infected chickens. All serum samples tested from the commercial layer flocks and 65% of the broiler flocks had antibodies against the OH strain. However, no correlation between the VN titers and ELISA titers was observed for the commercial broilers and layers sera by the majority of the kits. The results indicated that currently available commercial ELISA kits detect antibodies elicited by the two serotypes of IBDV. Hence, the prevalence of serotype 2 antibodies in the flocks should be considered while determining antibody profiles of the flocks against serotype 1 viruses.     

A single dilution enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantitative detection of antibodies to bovine herpesvirus type 1

Three serological assays were compared for detection of antibodies to bovine herpes-virus type 1. These were virus neutralization (VN), enhanced complement fixation (CF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The ELISA was developed using an infected cell lysate antigen and purified virus and was optimized in relation to antigen and antisera dilutions. The CF assay was enhanced by the addition of bovine complement. These 3 assays were compared for detection of: specific virus antibody titers; sero-conversions; early antibody response in experimentally-infected cattle. Both ELISA end-point titers and single dilution values were found to be more sensitive than the CF or VN assays for specific antibody level quantitation. With a single dilution ELISA test procedure a correlation was obtained between ELISA values and VN titers. Using the single dilution ELISA test the assay also detected antibodies in experimentally-infected cattle before either the VN or CF assays, and agreed with the VN test in 35/38 seroconversions found by 4-fold or more VN changes between acute and convalescent paired sera from naturally-infected animals. The single dilution ELISA was a rapid and sensitive test for routine antibody detection in bovine sera.     

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect subgroup-specific antibodies to avian leukosis viruses

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to detect antibodies against avian leukosis viruses (ALV), using antigens extracted from Rous-associated virus-inoculated chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) cells by Nonidet P-40 treatments. The antigens reacted strongly to sera of chickens immunized with antigenically homologous viruses, but weakly to those of chickens immunized with heterologous viruses. Antigens extracted from noninoculated CEF cells by the same procedures did not react to either of the immune sera. Normal control sera did not react to any of the antigens. Reactivities of immune sera were decreased markedly by the sera adsorbing with homologous Rous-associated virus-inoculated CEF cells, but not with heterologous CEF cells. The ELISA-specific optimal doses (the differences between the optimal doses with antigens from ALV-inoculated and noninoculated CEF cells) were correlated strongly with the virus-neutralization titers (r = 0.876, P less than 0.01). Examination of the antibody response from ALV-inoculated chickens revealed that ELISA detected antibodies at the same time or several weeks earlier than did the virus-neutralization test.     

Detection of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus: a comparison of three serological methods

Four different oil emulsion infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccines were inoculated into four-week-old specific pathogen-free chickens. At weekly intervals for five weeks, sera were obtained from the vaccinated birds and from uninoculated control birds and examined for antibodies against IBDV by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the quantitative agar gel precipitin (QAGP) test and the virus neutralisation (VN) test. There was a highly significant correlation between the mean responses to all tests; the highest correlation (0.818) was between VN and QAGP and the lowest (0.573) between QAGP and ELISA. Generally the ELISA detected positive sera earlier than the VN test which in turn was more sensitive than the QAGP test. The ELISA and QAGP test were less variable, more reproducible and easier to perform than the VN test.     

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies to exogenous avian leukosis virus

A microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting antibodies to avian leukosis virus (ALV) of subgroups A and B in infected chickens was developed with the use of Rous-associated virus (RAV)-1 (subgroup A) and RAV-2 (subgroup B) antigens purified by sucrose-gradient centrifugation. The antigen was used for ELISA after treatment with Triton X-100. In the ELISA, the subgroup viral antigen reacted strongly with homologous antiserum but also reacted with heterologous antiserum. Tests with serum absorbed with purified homologous and heterologous virus and tests for antigen-blocking by group-specific antibodies to ALV revealed that the reaction was caused mainly by subgroup-specific antibodies. The ELISA was 8 to 32 times more sensitive than the virus-neutralization (VN) test and detected antibodies to ALV earlier than the VN test in chickens infected experimentally with RAV-1 and RAV-2. In field application of the ELISA, 44.2% of 484 chicken sera were positive for RAV-1 and/or RAV-2 antigen, and 80.4% of flocks were positive. These findings indicate that ELISA is superior to the VN test in sensitivity, simplicity, rapidity, and applicability for large-scale field surveys for ALV infection.     

Blocking ELISA to distinguish pseudorabies virus-infected pigs from those vaccinated with a glycoprotein gIII deletion mutant

A blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test has been developed to distinguish pseudorabies virus (PRV)-infected pigs from those immunized with a glycoprotein g92(gIII) deletion mutant, PRV(dlg92dltk). The blocking ELISA utilizes 96-well microtiter test plates coated with a cloned PRV g92(gIII) antigen, a mouse monoclonal antibody against gIII antigen (moMCAgIII): horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) conjugate, and undiluted test sera. Analyses can be completed in less than 3 hours with results printed out by an automated plate reader. Analyses on over 300 pig sera from PRV-free farms, on sera from other species, and on control sera containing antibodies to microorganisms other than PRV showed that the ratio of the optical density at 405 nm for the test sample to the optical density at 405 nm for the negative control (S/N value) was greater than 0.7 for all sera. No false positives were identified. Likewise, the S/N values were greater than 0.7 for over 400 sera obtained from pigs vaccinated twice with more than 1,000 times the standard PRV (dlg92dltk) dose or 1-4 times with the standard dose (2 x 10(5) TCID50/pig). Following challenge exposure to virulent PRV, the S/N values of the vaccinates were 0.1, showing that g92(gIII) antibodies in the sera of experimentally challenged pigs strongly blocked the binding of the moMCAgIII:HRPO conjugate to the antigen-coated wells. Sera of 233 pigs from PRV-infected herds with virus neutralization (VN) titers of 1:4 or greater were tested. All except 2 of these sera had S/N values less than 0.7 and more than 175 had S/N values less than 0.1. Sixteen sera from fetal pigs with VN titers of 1:4 or greater had S/N values of 0.24 or less, but 2 sera with VN titers of 1:4 when tested 5 years prior to the PRV g92(gIII) blocking ELISA test gave false negative S/N values. Twenty-four of 29 pig sera from PRV-infected herds with VN titers less than 1:4 were positive for g92(gIII) antibodies, illustrating the sensitivity of the PRV g92(gIII) blocking ELISA test. Analyses on 7 sera with VN titers of 1:4-1:64 showed that titers obtained with the PRV g92(gIII) blocking ELISA test were from 2- to 16-fold greater than the VN titers. The accuracy and sensitivity of the PRV g92(gIII) blocking ELISA test was further demonstrated by analyses of 40 unknown sera supplied in the National Veterinary Services Laboratories 1988 PRV check test kit.     

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of vesicular stomatitis virus antibodies

A liquid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for the detection of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) types New Jersey (VSV-NJ) and Indiana subtype Indiana I (VSV-IND₁) antibodies in the sera of naturally and experimentally infected cattle, horses and swine. Four different VSV preparations were compared for use as antigen in the ELISA: virus used in neutralization tests, complement-fixation antigen, immunodiffusion ager gel antigen and viral glycoprotein. Comparative antibody titration results of virus neutralization (VN) and ELISA showed no statistically significant difference between serum titers obtained with the four antigens to VSV-NJ (P=0.21) and VSV-IND₁ (P=0.14). The viral glycoprotein antigen was incorporated in the ELISA system because it is non-infectious and induces neutralizing antibodies. The reliability and variability of the ELISA was determined by testing 516 bovine, equine and swine sera which originated from areas free of vesicular stomatitis, and by testing 186 sera from areas where outbreaks occur. ELISA and VN results were correlated (P < 0.001 for both serotypes), and no statiscafically difference was found between replications of the tests. The ELISA allows the testing of a larger number of sera in a shorter time than is possible with the VN test and it can be used in diagnostic laboratories in VSV-free areas for the support of epidemiological surveillance programs.     

Development and evaluation of an ELISA for the detection of antibody to infectious laryngotracheitis virus in chickens

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibody to infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) virus in chickens was developed and compared with the serum-neutralization assay. The ELISA routinely yielded 16-to-32-fold higher titers than the serum-neutralization test. To overcome the requirement for large amounts of purified viral antigen, the microtiter trays were initially coated with an antibody prepared against purified ILT virus. A relatively crude viral preparation could then be used to coat the trays. Sera from specific-pathogen-free chickens less than 12 weeks of age did not show nonspecific binding, although 2.7% of all sera from chickens between 13 and 64 weeks of age had nonspecific activity. The majority of nonspecific reactors came from one highly inbred flock of specific-pathogen-free chickens. A number of modifications of ELISA procedures reported to reduce the nonspecific binding of chicken sera were investigated. Treatment of the serum or the plate and changes in the composition of the diluent did not increase the relative sensitivity of the anti-ILT assay.     

Studies of infectious laryngotracheitis vaccines: immunity in layers

Ten-week-old layer chickens obtained from a commercial source were eye-drop vaccinated with chicken-embryo-origin (CEO) or tissue-culture-origin (TCO) vaccines for infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT). Controls were not vaccinated. Approximately one-third of the layers were challenged with virulent ILT virus at 21, 40, or 60 weeks of age. Serum samples taken from the layers before challenge were used in a virus neutralization (VN) test to determine vaccination titers at those three ages. Both vaccines induced low VN titers (geometric mean titer [GMT] less than 6). At 21 weeks of age, the titers produced by the two vaccines were not significantly different, but at 40 and 60 weeks of age the VN GMT of the CEO-vaccinated group was significantly greater than that of the TCO-vaccinated group. The VN GMTs did not drop over time in either group and actually rose between 21 and 60 weeks of age in the CEO group. Both vaccines protected layers against severe challenge with virulent ILT virus, neither being significantly better than the other under these experimental conditions. Unvaccinated sentinel chickens were maintained in contact with the vaccinated layers during three intervals between 1 day and 6 weeks post-vaccination. Diagnostic tests performed on the sentinels to detect lateral spread of vaccine virus from vaccinated to unvaccinated chickens showed scattered positive results.     

Improved preparation of ELISA antigen of infectious bursal disease virus.

Serotype 1 of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) adapted to chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) was used for the preparation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) antigen. After several passages of diluted viruses in CEF cultures, the titer of seed virus increased to 1.2 x 10(8) plaque-forming units/ml. Purified virus prepared from this seed virus had high titers of antigen and was less nonspecific than that from low titer of seed virus in an ELISA. The nonspecific reaction of purified virus decreased further after treatment with Triton X-100. When the specificity of this treated antigen was examined with specific-pathogen-free chicken sera before and during lay and with 14 antisera to some major avian viruses, this ELISA antigen had no nonspecific reaction and was specific to antibodies to serotypes 1 and 2 of IBDV.     

Comparison of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and conventional methods for avian serology

Sera tested for hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) activity against Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and virus-neutralizing (VN) activity against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and viral arthritis (VA) virus were collected from a wide variety of accessions into the Diagnostic Services Laboratory, Poultry Disease Research Center, University of Georgia. The sera were then segregated according to HI or VN titer to NDV, IBV, IBDV, or VA virus and stored frozen at -20 C until tested by two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). There was good correlation of mean Flockchek ELISA titers or EIA Systems sample-to-positive (S/P) ratios with specific HI or VN titers. Flockchek ELISA profile group 3 and EIA Systems mean S/P ratio of 1.12 corresponded to what were considered in our lab to be minimum protective titers for each antigen against virulent challenge in our area.     

Correlation between maternal serum antibodies and protection against bovine rotavirus diarrhea in calves

The correlation between maternal serum antibodies in beef calves at 2 days old and protection against diarrhea induced by natural bovine rotavirus (BRV) infection was examined. Virus neutralizing (VN) antibody titers against BRV in sera from calves that developed diarrhea by BRV infection within 14 days of age (BRV-diarrheal calves) were significantly lower than those from calves that had no diarrhea. In the BRV-diarrheal calves, a positive correlation was found between the VN antibody titers and age of the onset of diarrhea. There were negative correlations between the VN antibody titers and duration of the diarrhea, VN antibody titers and cumulative diarrhea scores, and the VN antibody titers and duration of virus shedding. These results suggest that the VN antibody titers against BRV in newborn calf serum could be an indicator of protection against BRV-induced diarrhea.     

Improvements to the hemagglutination inhibition test for serological assessment of recombinant fowlpox-H5-avian-influenza vaccination in chickens and its use along with an agar gel immunodiffusion test for differentiating infected from noninfected vaccinated animals

In general, avian influenza (AI) vaccines protect chickens from morbidity and mortality and reduce, but do not completely prevent, replication of wild AI viruses in the respiratory and intestinal tracts of vaccinated chickens. Therefore, surveillance programs based on serological testing must be developed to differentiate vaccinated flocks infected with wild strains of AI virus from noninfected vaccinated flocks in order to evaluate the success of vaccination in a control program and allow continuation of national and international commerce of poultry and poultry products. In this study, chickens were immunized with a commercial recombinant fowlpox virus vaccine containing an H5 hemagglutinin gene from A/turkey/Ireland/83 (H5N8) avian influenza (AI) virus (rFP-H5) and evaluated for correlation of immunological response by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) or agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) tests and determination of protection following challenge with a high pathogenicity AI (HPAI) virus. In two different trials, chickens immunized with the rFP-H5 vaccine did not develop AGID antibodies because the vaccine lacks AI nucleoprotein and matrix genes, but 0%-100% had HI antibodies, depending on the AI virus strain used in the HI test, the HI antigen inactivation procedure, and whether the birds had been preimmunized against fowlpox virus. The most consistent and highest HI titers were observed when using A/turkey/Ireland/83 (H5N8) HPAI virus strain as the beta-propiolactone (BPL)-inactivated HI test antigen, which matched the hemagglutinin gene insert in the rFP-H5 vaccine. In addition, higher HI titers were observed if ether or a combination of ether and BPL-inactivated virus was used in place of the BPL-inactivated virus. The rFP-H5 vaccinated chickens survived HPAI challenge and antibodies were detected by both AGID and HI tests. In conclusion, we demonstrated that the rFP-H5 vaccine allowed easy serological differentiation of infected from noninfected birds in vaccinated populations of chickens when using standard AGID and HI tests.     

Comparison of serologic techniques for the detection of antibodies against feline coronaviruses.

The seroprevalence of feline coronavirus (FCoV) antibodies was studied in cats in southern Italy. One hundred twenty sera collected from cats belonging to catteries or community shelters and to households were tested for FCoV type I and II antibodies. The virus neutralization (VN) was performed and compared with indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ninety-six sera tested positive for FCoV antibodies by VN and ELISA. Interestingly, ELISA revealed 2 more positive sera than did the VN test and 3 more positive sera than did the IFAT. All results were confirmed by Western blotting. ELISA proved to be more sensitive and detected a seroprevalence of about 82%. Considering the cross-reactivity of FCoV type I and type II, ELISA was able to detect antibodies against both serotypes, allowing the use of the assay as a reference test for sera screening. The high prevalence of antibodies observed indicates that FCoVs are common in southern Italian cat populations.     

Comparison of antibody detection assays for the diagnosis of equine herpesvirus 1 and 4 infections in horses

OBJECTIVE: To compare methods of detecting equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV1)- and EHV4-specific antibodies in horse sera. SAMPLE POPULATION: 33 acute and convalescent serum samples from experimentally or naturally infected horses after confirmed EHV1 or EHV4 infection. PROCEDURE: For each sample, serum antibody titers against EHV1 and EHV4 were determined by use of virus neutralization (VN) and complement fixation (CF) assays. The ELISA absorbance values for each serum sample were determined against the EHV1 and EHV4 recombinant ELISA antigens. Values obtained for acute and convalescent sera in each assay were compared. RESULTS: Following experimental infection of foals, EHV1 or EHV4 antibodies that were specific for the inoculating virus were detected only by use of the ELISA. Results of VN and CF assays indicated that the foals seroconverted to EHV1 and EHV4 following infection with EHV4 only. After EHV1-induced abortion, myeloencephalitis, or respiratory tract disease, the VN and CF assay results revealed seroconversion to EHV1 and EHV4, whereas results of the ELISA revealed seroconversion to EHV1 only. Similarly, after confirmed EHV4-induced respiratory tract disease, increases in EHV4-specific antibodies were detected only by use of the ELISA with no indication of an increase in EHV1 antibodies. The CF and, to a lesser degree, VN assays revealed that seroconversion to EHV1 and EHV4 occurred between the time of obtaining acute and convalescent serum samples. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The EHV1/EHV4 type-specific antibody ELISA clearly identifies horses that have been infected with EHV1 or EHV4 by use of acute and convalescent sera. Results of VN and CF assays indicate that cross-reactive antibodies greatly limit their use.     

Detection and quantification of antibodies to infectious bronchitis virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting and quantifying antibodies to infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is described. Purified antigen, prepared on sucrose density gradients, was required to decrease the nonspecific background, and saline was found to be superior to bicarbonate buffer for coating the cuvettes with antigen. The sensitivity of the test in measuring antiserum titers could be altered greatly and linearly by adjusting the protein content of the antigen. The ELISA was able to detect an antibody response to IBV infection earlier than the virus-neutralization (VN) test. Antibody titers obtained by ELISA were considerably higher than those obtained by VN. Serotypes of IBV could not be differentiated with ELISA because of extensive antiserum cross-reactivity. The utility of ELISA in studies on IBV is discussed.     

应用间接ELISA检测鸡痘病毒抗体方法的建立

建立了检测鸡痘病毒抗体的间接ELISA方法。应用该方法检测鸡痘阳性血清，其灵敏度为琼脂扩散试验的400～800倍，而且还具有特异性强、操作简便、快速等特点。     

Comparison of precipitin antibodies and virus-neutralizing antibodies to infectious bursal disease virus

Three hundred twenty-two serum samples from commercial pullets and multiplier breeders were analyzed for agar-gel precipitin (AGP) antibodies and virus-neutralizing (VN) antibodies to infectious bursal disease virus. Two hundred thirty-four of these sera were AGP-positive, and 88 were AGP-negative. The geometric mean of the reciprocal of the VN titers for the AGP-positive sera was 208.7, and 232 (99.1%) had a VN titer of 1:16 or greater. In contrast, the geometric mean of the reciprocal of the VN titers for the AGP-negative sera was 6.1, but 53 (60.2%) had a VN titer ranging from 1:4 to 1:256. When the AGP test was compared with the VN test, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the AGP test were 81.5% and 100%.     

Studies of infectious laryngotracheitis vaccines: immunity in broilers

Broiler chickens were vaccinated at 18 days of age against infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT) using chicken-embryo-origin (CEO) and tissue-culture-origin (TCO) vaccines, each vaccine given either by drinking water, spray, or eyedrop. Controls were not vaccinated. The broilers were challenged 3 weeks later with virulent ILT virus (USDA challenge strain). Serum samples taken before challenge were analyzed by a virus neutralization (VN) test to determine titers due to vaccination. Both vaccines, regardless of route of administration, produced low VN titers, geometric mean titer (GMT) being less than 4.0 in all vaccinated groups. When administered by the same route, the CEO vaccine produced higher titers than the TCO vaccine. Titers following drinking-water or eyedrop administration of vaccines were higher than titers following spray vaccination. There was an inverse relationship between pre-challenge VN titers of groups of birds and the percentage of birds in the groups dying from ILT virus challenge. The drinking-water route of vaccination provided the most protection, while the spray provided the least.