Measurement of equine prolactin with an equine-canine radioimmunoassay: seasonal effects on the prolactin response to thyrotropin releasing hormone

A radioimmunoassay (RIA) based on anti-equine prolactin antiserum and radioiodinated canine prolactin was used to assess the dose response of plasma prolactin to thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) in mares in the nonbreeding season (winter) and in mares in estrus in the breeding season (summer). Mares were administered TRH intravenously and blood samples were collected via jugular catheters at −15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 min relative to injection. Doses of TRH were 0, .08, .40, 2.0 and 10.0 mg per mare (n = 3 per dose within each season). The prolactin response was assessed by absolute hormonal concentrations before and after TRH injection and by net area under the curve. Prolactin concentrations in plasma before injection of TRH were higher (P < .01) in estrous mares in summer than in anestrous mares in winter (4.8 vs 1.3 ng/ml). Moreover, there was a greater (P < .01) response to TRH injection in estrous mares than in anestrous mares. Based on areas under the curve, there was an effect of season (P < .01) and of TRH dose (P < .01) as well as a season-dose interaction (P < .01). In general, there was little or no prolactin response to any dose of TRH in anestrous mares in winter when pre-TRH concentrations were low. In contrast, there was an increase in the prolactin response with increasing doses of TRH up to 2.0 mg in estrous mares in summer; 2.0 and 10.0 mg of TRH resulted in similar prolactin secretion. We conclude 1) that prolactin secretion in the horse is stimulated by TRH as has been reported for other species and 2) that prolactin concentrations and the TRH-induced secretion of prolactin are greater in estrous mares in summer than in anestrous mares in winter.     

Effects of obesity on insulin and glucose metabolism in cyclic heifers

Effects of degree of obesity on basal concentrations of insulin, glucose, thyroxine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3), estradiol-17 beta (E) and progesterone (P) were measured in serum from 50 estrous and 73 diestrous Holstein heifers and the insulin response to glucose infusion was assessed in diestrous obese (n = 7) and lean (n = 7) heifers. Basal concentrations of glucose, T4, T3, E and P were not correlated with degree of obesity, although concentrations of glucose, T4 and T3 were higher (P less than .05) at estrus than diestrus. Basal concentrations of insulin at estrus and diestrus were positively correlated (r = .6; P less than .001) with degree of obesity but this relationship was different (P less than .001) between estrus and diestrus. Furthermore, there was interaction (P less than .001) between body condition and stage of the estrous cycle only for basal concentrations (mean +/- SE) of insulin, with the difference in insulin levels (microU/ml) between 12 obese and 12 lean heifers at diestrus (11.7 +/- 1.3 vs 6.7 +/- .6; P less than .05) increasing during estrus (21.9 +/- 2.4 vs 10.8 +/- 1.3; P less than .001). Insulin response to glucose infusion was greater in obese than in lean heifers, whether determined as actual concentration (P less than .01) or as insulin response areas (P less than .05) above base-line concentrations. Obese heifers were less responsive to insulin since hyperinsulinemia and euglycemia coexisted, and because glucose fractional removal rates were similar in both groups after glucose infusion in spite of greater concentrations of insulin in obese heifers. Thus, obesity in heifers was associated with insulin resistance, basal hyperinsulinemia and greater glucose-induced secretion of insulin.     

Effects of physiologic and pharmacologic agents on serum prolactin concentrations in the nonpregnant mare

Four studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of several physiologic and pharmacologic agents on serum prolactin concentrations in the nonpregnant mare. An increase in prolactin measured in response to administration of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH; 50 micrograms, iv) was found not to vary (P = .20) in mares in estrus compared with mares in diestrus (5 to 10 d post-ovulation). Administration in the dopamine receptor blocker, metoclopramide (25 or 100 mg, im), rapidly increased serum prolactin, and the response was dependent on dose administered (total prolactin measured for 420 min was 3,362.7 +/- 182.1 ng for 25 mg, and 4,485.7 +/- 212.6 ng for 100 mg administered im; P less than .05), but not on route of injection (3,026.3 +/- 492.3 ng prolactin with 25 mg, iv; P less than .05). Similarly, sulpiride, a D-2 dopamine receptor blocker, induced an increase in serum prolactin, which appeared to be maximal at a dose of 25 mg (6,556.3 +/- 636.9 ng prolactin/420 min compared with 6,594.5 +/- 169.3 ng prolactin/420 min with 100 mg sulpiride; P less than .10). Finally, bromocriptine, a dopamine agonist, decreased serum prolactin compared with vehicle-injected controls, but the inhibitory effect was found only when basal levels of serum prolactin were highest (in May). These data suggest that mechanisms controlling prolactin secretion in the mare are similar to those described in other mammalian species, and that the seasonal decline in serum prolactin is not the result of increased sensitivity to the proposed prolactin-inhibiting factor, dopamine.     

Effect of photoperiod and temperature on prolactin secretion in ovariectomized gilts

Five ovariectomized (OVX) gilts were placed in each of two chambers at 20 C with a photoperiod of 12 h light and 12 h dark for 8 d (12L:12D). On d 1, blood samples were collected via jugular cannula every 30 min from 0830 to 1630. At 1630, 200 micrograms of thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) were injected iv and blood samples taken every 10 min for 1 h and every 30 min for the next 2 h. On d 2, samples were taken every 30 min from 0830 to 0930 and from 1530 to 1630. Temperature was changed to 10 C or 30 C on d 3. Samples were taken from 0830 to 1630 on d 3, 4 and 9. At 1630 on d 9, the TRH challenge was repeated. Mean basal serum concentrations of prolactin (PRL) were similar for all gilts and for all periods. However, serum PRL response (ng PRL X ml-1 X 150 min-1) to TRH increased (P less than .0001) after exposure to 30 C, while exposure to 10 C failed to alter PRL response. In Exp. 2, six ovariectomized gilts were assigned to each chamber. The protocol of Exp. 1 was followed through d 3, except temperature and photoperiod were changed to 10 C and 8L:16D or 30 C and 16L:8D. On d 34 the TRH challenge was repeated. Mean basal serum concentration of PRL was similar for all gilts and all periods. However, simultaneous increases in temperature and photoperiod increased (P less than .005) serum PRL response to TRH, whereas simultaneous decreases in temperature and photoperiod failed to alter PRL response to TRH.     

Effect of feeding thyrotropin-releasing hormone to lactating sows

Two experiments were conducted to assess the effects of feeding thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) during lactation on sows. In Exp. 1, sows were fed 0, 1, 10, 100 or 1,000 mg TRH on d 10.8 +/- .4 (mean +/- SE) after parturition. Blood samples were taken from sows every 30 min from -2 h to 8 h and at 10, 12 and 18 h from feeding. Consumption of 100 or 1,000 mg TRH increased mean serum concentrations of thyroxine (T4; P less than .001), 1,000 mg TRH increased growth hormone (GH; P less than .06) and 100 or 1,000 mg TRH increased prolactin (PRL; P less than .01), but insulin (INS; P greater than .10) was unaffected by TRH. Serum concentrations of T4 were elevated within 2 to 4 h after feeding TRH and remained elevated for 12 to 18 h. Concentrations of GH and PRL began to increase immediately after feeding 100 or 1,000 mg TRH and remained elevated for 6 and 8 h, respectively. In Exp. 2, sows were fed 0 or 200 mg TRH from d 111 of gestation to weaning at 27.1 +/- .3 d of lactation. Consumption of TRH elevated concentrations of T4 at all stages of lactation and increased respiration rate on d 10 and d 20, heart rate on d 20, and milk production on d 20 of lactation. Consumption of TRH did not influence number of pigs born, number born alive, survival rate during lactation, sow body weight, heartgirth, backfat depth, feed disappearance, or milk production on d 10 of lactation. Piglets nursing sows fed TRH were similar in weight to piglets nursing sows not fed TRH on d 0 and 5 of lactation, but they were heavier on d 10 (P less than .07), 15 (P less than .001), 20 (P less than .001) and 27 (P less than .0001). Sows fed TRH took longer (P less than .001) to return to estrus after weaning than control sows. Results indicated that feeding TRH elevated T4, GH and PRL and that feeding TRH for the duration of lactation increased milk production on d 20 of lactation and increased weaning weights, but it delayed estrus after weaning.     

Serum concentrations of thyroxine, 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine, thyrotropin, and prolactin in dogs before and after thyrotropin-releasing hormone administration

Serum concentrations of thyrotropin (TSH), prolactin, thyroxine, and 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine in 15 euthyroid dogs and 5 thyroidectomized and propylthiouracil-treated dogs after thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) administration were measured. Although thyroidectomized and propylthiouracil-treated dogs had higher (P less than 0.01) base-line concentrations of TSH in serum than did euthyroid dogs, concentrations of TSH after TRH administration varied at 7.5, 15, and 30 minutes with 14 of 45 samples obtained from healthy dogs having lower TSH concentrations than before TRH challenge. Similarly, concentrations of 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine in the serum of euthyroid dogs 4 hours after TRH administration were similar (P less than 0.05) to concentrations before TRH challenge. Although the mean concentration of thyroxine in serum was elevated (P less than 0.05) 4 hours after administration of TRH to euthyroid animals, as compared with base-line levels, the individual response was variable with concentrations not changing or decreasing in 4 dogs. Therefore, the TRH challenge test as performed in the current investigation was of limited value in evaluating canine pituitary gland function. Although mean concentrations of TSH in serum were higher (P less than 0.05) in euthyroid dogs after TRH administration, the response was too variable among individual animals for accurate evaluation of pituitary gland function. Concentrations of prolactin in the sera of dogs after TRH administration, confirmed previous reports that exogenously administered TRH results in prolactin release from the canine pituitary and indicated that the TRH used was biologically potent.     

Influence of ambient temperature on prolactin concentrations in serum of Holstein and Brahman x Hereford heifers

Four Holstein and four Brahman x Hereford heifers about 8 mo of age were used in a study to determine whether breed influences the effects of ambient temperature on concentrations' of prolactin in serum. Two heifers of each breed were stanchioned in each of two environmental chambers at 21 C for 7 d, after which chamber temperatures were changed to 7 or 31 C during 6 h. After 5 d at 7, 21 or 31 C, heifers were injected with 60 micrograms thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH). A switch-back design was used and each heifer was exposed to all treatments. Concentrations of prolactin in serum of heifers during exposure to 7, 21 or 31 C for 5 d were related to ambient temperature (9.0, 20.9 and 29.5 ng/ml, respectively; P less than .001), but the response was not influenced by breed. Heifers of both breeds responded similarly to treatment with TRH, and prolactin in serum increased (P less than .001) within 5 min from 7.0 +/- 3.2 to 45.7 +/- 8.2 ng/ml in heifers at 7 C, from 13.1 +/- 1.6 to 97.2 +/- 9.6 ng/ml in heifers at 21 C and from 18.2 +/- 3.5 to 96.2 +/- 11.3 ng/ml in heifers at 31 C. We conclude that concentrations of prolactin in serum of heifers are positively associated with ambient temperature and that the effects of temperature on basal and TRH-stimulated concentrations of prolactin do not differ significantly between Holstein and Brahman x Hereford heifers. Thus, differences in tolerance to heat were not related to differences in prolactin secretion.     

Luteinizing hormone and testosterone response of sexually active and inactive rams.

The objective of this study was to identify rams exhibiting high (HP) and low (LP) levels of sexual performance and to determine whether their respective behavioral responses to ewes in estrus were related to changes in serum testosterone (T) and LH concentrations. Rams were selected on the basis of standardized serving capacity tests. Plasma T and LH concentrations in rams were measured in three experiments: 1) after 15 min of exposure to estrous ewes, 2) after an injection of 500 ng of LHRH, and 3) during an 11-h exposure to estrous ewes. During 15 min of exposure to ewes, HP rams were sexually active, whereas LP rams showed no sexual interest. Secretion of LH was similar (P greater than .05) between ram groups. Sexual arousal, copulation, and ejaculation of HP males were not related (P greater than .05) to LH secretion. Exposure to estrous ewes for 11 h, however, stimulated LH pulse frequency and elevated basal LH and T concentrations in HP but not LP rams (P less than .001). Luteinizing hormone secretion was positively correlated to the frequency of mounts (r = .19; P less than .01) and ejaculation (r = .17; P less than .03). Aggressive behavior of rams directed at ewes was negatively correlated to LH (r = -.22 P less than .003). Concentrations of LH and T after LHRH injection were similar between HP and LP rams (P greater than .05). These results show that the effects of the ewe on LH secretion of rams depend on length of the exposure period and sexual activity of the male.     

Effects of domperidone and thyrotropin-releasing hormone on secretion of luteinizing hormone and prolactin during the luteal phase and following induction of luteal regression in sheep

Effects of domperidone, a peripheral dopamine receptor antagonist, on secretion of LH and prolactin were studied during the luteal phase and following administration of PGF2 alpha. Since hyperprolactinemia has been reported to inhibit secretion of LH in ewes, effects of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) also were examined. Ewes 8-10 days post-estrus were assigned to be treated with: 1) vehicle (n = 5); 2) 0.3 mg domperidone (n = 6); 3) 1.0 mg domperidone (n = 6); 4) 3 micrograms TRH (n = 6); or 5) 10 micrograms TRH (n = 6) every 4 hours for 60 hr. Luteal regression was induced with PGF2 alpha at 12 hr after initiation of treatments. During the luteal phase, pulses of LH were more frequent (P less than .05) and the amplitudes of these were higher (P less than .05) in ewes treated with domperidone or TRH than in control ewes. These changes in LH occurred even though each treatment elevated markedly concentrations of prolactin in plasma. After induction of luteal regression, mean of LH and frequency of LH discharges were similar in all groups. However, in ewes treated with the 1.0 mg/4 hr dose of domperidone the pulse amplitude was greater than in the other groups (2.3 vs 1.1 ng/ml). Dose-response relationships and the magnitude of the prolactin release following domperidone or TRH varied with time. Treatments did not affect the timing of the LH surge or the increase in progesterone associated with the subsequent cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Responses of seasonally anovulatory mares to daily administration of thyrotropin-releasing hormone and(or) gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog

Seventeen seasonally anovulatory light horse mares were treated daily, starting January 5 (d 1), for 28 d with GnRH analog (GnRH-A; 50 ng/kg BW) and(or) thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH; 5 microg/kg BW) in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to test the hypothesis that combined treatment may stimulate follicular growth and development. Ovaries were examined via ultrasonography and jugular blood samples were collected every 3 d. Frequent blood samples were collected after treatment injections on d 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 16, and 22; on d 29, all mares received an i.v. mixture of GnRH, TRH, sulpiride, and EP51389 (a growth hormone secretagogue) to assess pituitary responsiveness. No consistent effects (P > 0.1) of treatment were observed for plasma LH, FSH, prolactin, or thyroxine concentrations in samples collected every 3 d. The only effect on ovarian follicle numbers was a reduction in number of follicles 11 to 19 mm in diameter due to TRH treatment (P = 0.029). No mare ovulated during treatment. On the days of frequent sampling, mean LH (P = 0.0001) and FSH (P = 0.001) concentrations were higher in mares receiving GnRH-A and tended to increase from d 1 through 7. In contrast, mean prolactin (P = 0.001) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (P = 0.0001) concentrations were high in mares receiving TRH on d 1 but rapidly decreased thereafter. When mares were administered the secretagogue mixture on d 29, the LH response was greater (P = 0.0002) in mares that had previously received GnRH-A but the FSH response was not affected (P > 0.1); the prolactin response was greater (P = 0.014) and the TSH response was smaller (P = 0.0005) in mares that had previously received TRH. Surprisingly, an immediate growth hormone response to EP51389 was absent in all mares. In conclusion, daily GnRH-A treatment stimulated plasma LH and FSH concentrations immediately after injection; although no long-term elevation in preinjection concentrations was achieved, the responses gradually increased over time, indicating a stimulation of gonadotropin production and storage. Daily treatment with TRH stimulated plasma TSH and prolactin concentrations, but the response diminished rapidly and was minimal within a few days, indicating a depletion of pituitary stores and little or no stimulation of production. There was no beneficial effect of adding TRH treatment to the daily GnRH-A regimen.     

Suppressive action of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and luteinizing hormone on function of the developing ovine corpus luteum

Experiments were conducted to examine the effects of exogenous GnRH and LH on serum concentrations of progesterone (P4) in the ewe. Ewes in Exp. 1 and 2 were laparotomized on d 2 of an estrous cycle and ewes with corpora lutea (CL) in both ovaries were unilaterally ovariectomized. Ewes with CL in one ovary only were not ovariectomized. While they were anesthetized, ewes (n = 5) were injected with 25 micrograms GnRH (Exp. 1) or 50 ng GnRH (Exp. 2) into the artery supplying the ovary bearing the CL. Control ewes (n = 5 in each experiment) were injected similarly with saline. In Exp. 3, six ewes were injected i.v. (jugular) on d 2 with 100 micrograms oLH (t = 0) and 50 micrograms oLH at 15, 30 and 45 min; six control ewes were injected similarly with saline. Jugular blood was collected from all ewes at frequent intervals after treatment for LH analysis and on alternate days of the cycle through d 10 or 11 for P4 analysis. Treatment with 25 micrograms GnRH increased serum concentrations of LH at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min postinjection (P less than .001) and reduced serum concentrations of P4 on d 7 through 11 (treatment x day interaction; P less than .05). Injection with 50 ng GnRH caused a slight increase in serum concentrations of LH at 15 min but had no effect on serum concentrations of P4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Follicle stimulating hormone pattern and luteal function in ewes receiving bovine follicular fluid during three stages of the estrous cycle

The objectives of this study were to determine 1) the ability of charcoal-extracted bovine follicular fluid (bFF) to suppress endogenous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) at various stages of the estrous cycle and 2) the effects of suppression of FSH on luteal function and lengths of the current and subsequent estrous cycles. Twenty-six mature ewes were assigned randomly to receive 5 ml of either bFF or saline, subcutaneously, at 8-h intervals on d 1 through 5 (bFF n = 6; saline n = 3), d 6 through 10 (bFF n = 6; saline n = 3) or d 11 through 15 (bFF n = 6; saline n = 2) of the estrous cycle (d 0 = estrus). Blood was collected daily beginning at estrus and continued until the third estrus (two estrous cycles) or 40 d; more frequent samples were collected 2 h prior to initiation of treatment (0600), hourly for the first 8 h of treatment, then every 4 h until 0800 on the first day after treatment, and finally at 1600 and 2400 on that day. Plasma concentrations of FSH were lower (P less than .001) in bFF-treated than in saline-treated ewes. Treatment with bFF reduced (P less than .05) plasma concentrations of progesterone during the current but not during the subsequent estrous cycle. Treatment with bFF did not affect plasma concentrations of estradiol-17 beta. Administration of bFF on d 11 through 15 of the estrous cycle lengthened the interval from the decline in progesterone to estrus and the inter-estrous interval by approximately 3 and 4 d, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of sexual stimulation, with and without ejaculation, on serum concentrations of LH, FSH, testosterone, cortisol and prolactin in stallions

Six lighthorse stallions with previous sexual experience were used to determine the short-term effects of sexual stimulation (SS; 5 min exposure to an estrous mare), SS plus ejaculation (SSE), and no stimulation (control) on serum concentrations of LH, FSH, testosterone, cortisol and prolactin. Stallions received one treatment per day on d 1, 4 and 7. Treatments were assigned such that each stallion 1) received each treatment once and 2) experienced a unique sequence of treatments. Neither SS nor SSE had any consistent effects on LH or FSH concentrations. Testosterone concentrations during control bleedings increased (P less than .05) with time. This increase was suppressed (P less than .05) by both SS and SSE. Cortisol concentrations increased (P less than .05) immediately after SS and SSE. Cortisol concentrations also tended to increase during the control bleedings, but only in stallions that previously had been exposed to SS or SSE. Prolactin concentrations increased (P less than .05) immediately after SS and SSE and tended to rise during control bleedings in stallions previously exposed to SS or SSE. We conclude that 1) prolactin and cortisol were secreted rapidly in response to SS and SSE, 2) the rise in cortisol concentrations likely suppressed testosterone secretion within the next hour, and 3) stallions appeared to associate the distant sounds of other stallions with their own previous exposure to SS and SSE, resulting in a cortisol response (and perhaps a prolactin response) even in the absence of direct stimulation.     

Effect of constant infusion of oxytocin on luteal lifespan and oxytocin-induced release of prostaglandin F2α in heifers

Two experiments were conducted to determine whether constant infusion of oxytocin would prolong the luteal phase and inhibit uterine prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha) secretion in heifers. In Experiment 1, twelve heifers, treated with saline (SAL) or oxytocin (OXY) via jugular cannulae infusions (INF) or osmotic minipumps (OMP), were allotted at estrus into four treatment groups (n = 3). Treatments were: SAL-INF, SAL-OMP, OXY-INF and OXY-OMP. Physiological saline or oxytocin was given from Days 10 to 23 (Day 0 = estrus) of the estrous cycle. Method of treatment (jugular cannula infusion or osmotic minipump) had no effect (P greater than 0.05) on estrous cycle length or pattern of secretion of progesterone; therefore, data were pooled. Estrous cycle lengths were extended (P less than 0.01) for heifers which received oxytocin (25.3 +/- 0.4 d) compared to saline (20.5 +/- 0.4 d). Luteolysis did not occur in oxytocin-treated heifers until after treatment ceased. Experiment 2 was designed and conducted identically to Experiment 1 with the addition of a "challenge" injection of oxytocin (100 IU oxytocin, i.v.) given on Day 16 of the estrous cycle. Treatment of heifers with oxytocin extended (P less than 0.05) estrous cycle length by an average of 3 d compared to heifers treated with saline. The "challenge" injection induced (P less than 0.05) secretion of PGF2 alpha (as measured by the stable PGF2 alpha metabolite, 15-keto-13,14-dihydro-PGF2 alpha) in saline-treated but not oxytocin-treated heifers. In both Experiment 1 and 2, serum concentrations of FSH were elevated (P less than 0.05) in oxytocin-treated heifers. No increase was observed for LH or prolactin. The rise in estradiol-17 beta at luteolysis was not affected (P greater than 0.10) by treatment. In summary, constant infusion of oxytocin extended luteal lifespan, prolonged secretion of progesterone, and inhibited oxytocin-induced secretion of PGF2 alpha. Constant infusion of oxytocin did not affect serum concentrations of estradiol-17 beta, LH or prolactin; however, serum concentrations of FSH were elevated during the oxytocin treatment period.     

Influence of nutrition and body condition on pituitary, ovarian, and thyroid function of nonlactating beef cows

Nonpregnant Hereford cows (n = 70) were used to determine the effect of nutrient intake and body condition on reproductive and thyroid function. Body condition scores (BCS; 1 = emaciated; 9 = obese) of cows averaged 5.0 +/- .2 on July 1, and cows were fed for 4 mo either to lose weight and BCS (thin; n = 22), to maintain weight and BCS (moderate; n = 24), or to gain weight and BCS (fat; n = 24). After November 1, cows received a complete ration to maintain weight and BCS. Cows were slaughtered in December (six thin, eight moderate, and eight fat cows) or the subsequent March (16 cows per group). Before slaughter, cows were given two injections of prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF) 11 d apart. Six days after the second PGF injection, cows were simultaneously treated with 100 micrograms of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; i.m.) and 100 micrograms of thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH; i.v.) and serum samples were obtained. The BCS of cows at slaughter (8 d after PGF) averaged 3.4, 5.3, and 7.1 (P less than .01) and carcass energy content averaged 243, 432, and 714 Mcal (P less than .01) for thin, moderate, and fat cows, respectively. Wet ovarian (P less than .001) and corpora lutea (P less than .01) weights were heavier for fat cows. Content of LH in the pituitary gland and concentrations of thyroxine (T4) in serum after GnRH/TRH were not influenced by nutrient intake or BCS. However, thin cows had greater concentrations (P less than .05) of LH in serum after GnRH/TRH than did moderate or fat cows. We conclude that nutrient intake and body energy reserves of beef cows influenced ovarian function and LH in serum after treatment with GnRH.     

Daily rhythm of cortisol, and evidence for a photo-inducible phase for prolactin secretion in nonpregnant mares housed under non-interrupted and skeleton photoperiods

Studies were conducted in anestrous mares to characterize daily rhythms of cortisol in non-interrupted [ambient and 16 h light (L): 8 h dark (D)] and skeleton (10L:4D:2L:8D, 10L:6D:2L:6D and 10L:8D:2L:4D) photoperiods, and to determine if there exists a photosensitive phase for the secretion of prolactin. Neither peak or nadir concentrations of cortisol, nor the time of peak or nadir concentrations differed among photoperiod treatments. Highest concentrations (66 +/- 4.4 ng/ml, mean +/- SE) occurred between 0700 and 0900, whereas lowest concentrations (31 +/- 3.6 ng/ml) were found from 1900 to 2300. Mean daily concentrations of serum prolactin were significantly higher in mares housed under the 16L:8D and the 10L:8D:2L:4D photoperiods as compared with the remaining photoperiod treatments, and were lowest in the ambient photoperiod treatment. The mean daily concentration of prolactin in February among photoperiod treatments was inversely related to the number of days (from December 1) to first seasonal ovulation (r = -.92, P = .027). The results were interpreted to: 1) suggest that mares in the 10L:8D:2L:4D skeleton photoperiod do not phase-shift to interpret the 2-h light pulse as the beginning of their subjective day; and 2) provide further evidence that the photo-inducible phase for both prolactin secretion and the stimulation of seasonal reproductive activity occurs 8 to 10 h following the onset of the dark period (scotophase).     

Differential growth factor content of uterine luminal fluids from large white and prolific Meishan pigs during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy

Uterine luminal fluids (ULF) from Large White (LW) and prolific Chinese Meishan (MS) gilts were compared with respect to their peptide growth factor content during an estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) was quantitated by RIA; in vitro growth promoting properties of uterine luminal fluid mitogen (ULFM) were measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA of quiescent AKR-2B fibroblastic cells in culture. Peak concentrations (pg/microgram ULF protein) of IGF-I in ULF of Large White and Meishan gilts, respectively, were: estrous cycle, 9.8 +/- 1.4 (on d 10) and 39.7 +/- 7.8 (on d 12); gestation, 13.1 +/- 3.2 (on d 8 and 10) and 11.9 +/- 2.1 (on d 12), with differences among days (except d 10, P greater than .5) being affected by breed (P less than .10). For both breeds, there was a rapid decline in IGF-I concentrations by d 14 of the cycle and of pregnancy. Uterine luminal fluid mitogen activity was greater (P less than .01) for LW than for MS gilts on d 10 to 14 of an estrous cycle and gestation and diminished in a time-dependent manner in both breeds. No correlation was observed between IGF-I concentrations and uterine weights for either breed. In contrast, a negative correlation between uterine weight and ULFM activity was detected for cyclic (MS: r = -.855, P less than .10; LW: r = -.834, P less than .05) and pregnant (MS: r = -.806, P less than .10; LW: r = -.928, P less than .05) gilts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Reproductive physiology of the nonpregnant mare. An overview and update

This article reviews the reproductive events in the nonpregnant mare with emphasis on recent advances. The discussion is restricted to the salient features of puberty (prenatal and prepubertal events), seasonality (gonadotropins, photoperiod, and other modifying factors), and the estrous cycle (hormones, estrus, diestrus, and the control of cyclicity) in the nonpregnant mare.     

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation testing in healthy dogs

Serum triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) concentrations were determined after IV administration of 200 micrograms of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) to 10 healthy euthyroid dogs. Significant (P less than 0.05) changes were not found in the T3 concentration throughout an 8-hour sampling interval. All dogs had a significant increase (P less than 0.05) in the T4 concentration at 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours after TRH administration. The largest increase in the serum T4 concentration occurred 4 hours after TRH injection. From 4 to 8 hours after TRH administration, the mean increase above basal T4 concentrations was 13.9 +/- 5.4 ng/ml.     

The effect of environmental temperature on concentrations of thyroxine and triiodothyronine after thyrotropin releasing hormone in steers

Twenty-four Angus X Hereford steers (155 +/- 4 kg) were used to examine thyroid function during exposure to ambient temperatures of 4, 18 and 32 C. Jugular cannulae were inserted after steers were acclimated to individual stalls in environmentally controlled chambers at 18 C for 3 d. The day following cannulation, ambient temperatures were changed 2 C/h for 7 h and serum samples were collected hourly. After steers were exposed to either 4, 18 or 32 C for 1 and 72 h, thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH; 50 micrograms, iv) was rapidly infused. Serum samples were collected hourly for 8 h after each treatment with TRH and every 8 h for 3 d between treatments. Rectal temperatures and respiratory were greater (P less than .05) in steers exposed to 32 C compared with steers at 4 C. During the change in environmental temperature, the concentrations of thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) over time tended (P less than .10) to decrease in steers exposed to 32 C compared with those at 4 C. Concentrations of T4 and T3 after the second treatment with TRH were significantly less in steers exposed to 32 C compared with those at 4 C. The response of T4 to TRH was reduced (P less than .01) after the second treatment with TRH compared with the first for steers exposed to all three temperatures, whereas, the response of T3 was reduced (P less than .05) after the second treatment with TRH only in steers exposed to 32 C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)