Treatment of anovulatory anoestrous postpartum dairy cows with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), prostaglandin F2 alpha, GnRH regimen or with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate

AIM: To compare 2 treatments for anovulatory anoestrus (AA) in postpartum dairy cows. The treatments were combinations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and prostaglandin F2 (PG) or progesterone (P4) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB). METHODS: Forty AA cows from each of 5 herds were blocked by age (2 or 2 years old) and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments. The first group (GPG) were treated with 250 mug of a GnRH analogue, gonadorelin, followed 7 days later by 15 mg of the PG analogue, luprostiol. Two days later the cows were injected with 250 mug of gonadorelin. Cows were artificially inseminated 16-24 h after the second GnRH injection. The second group (P4+ODB) were treated with an intravaginal P4 releasing device for 6 days, followed 24 h after device removal by injection of 1 mg of ODB. Cows were pregnancy tested 35-40 days after the initial insemination and twice again at 6-8 week intervals thereafter. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between P4+ODB and GPG groups in the percentage of cows submitted for insemination in the first 7 days (94.0% vs 100% for P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.3), in conception rate to first insemination within the first 7 days (43.6% vs 35.0% for P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.2), in the percentage of cows conceiving in the first 28 days of the breeding period (68.0% vs 58.3%, P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.1), or in median interval from the end of treatment to conception (20 vs 21 days; p>0.1). CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the reproductive performance of AA cows treated with either P4+ODB or GPG were detected. However, given the small number of animals enrolled, further data are required before the GPG protocol can be recommended for treatment of AA cows.     

Effects of GnRH in combination with PGF2α on the dynamics of follicular and luteal cells in post-pubertal Holstein heifers

Holstein heifers were randomly allotted by weight, age and body condition score to one of three treatments to test the hypothesis that GnRH administration concurrent with PGF_2α injection would advance follicle or corpus luteum (CL) development parallel to an induced luteolysis of the pre-existing CL. Heifers in the control group (n = 14) received two treatments of PGF_2α(25 mg, im) given 10 days apart. Groups 2 (n = 14) and 3 (n = 14) received an additional treatment of GnRH (100 μg, im) after the first and second PGF_2α respectively. Estrus detection began immediately after PGF_2α and continued for 80 h. Blood sampling was initiated 7 days prior to the first PGF_2α (day − 7) and continued on days 0, 7, 10 (prior to the second PGF_2α), 17 and 24. Heifers were artificially inseminated after the second PGF_2α and pregnancy diagnosed at 60 days. There was a trend (P < .10) toward a lower estrus response in group 3 when compared to the other groups. Pregnant heifers in group 2 had lower progesterone (0.44 ± 0.09 vs. 1.72 ± 0.56 ng/ml) a week after the second PGF_2α than the non-pregnant animals in that group (P < .05). Similar results were observed in the control group but only within the responding heifers (0.61 ± 0.08 vs. 0.93 ± 0.03 ng/ml; P < .05). Progesterone in heifers in group 2 remained high on day 0, 7, and 10 (1.48 ± 0.37, 1.23 ± 0.39, 1.96 ± 0.36 ng/ml) in spite of the treatment with PGF_2α. This data suggest that administration of GnRH following PGF_2α alters bovine luteal and/or follicular cell function.     

Changes in the C-reactive protein and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2α concentrations of uterine lavage samples after the administration of povidone-iodine in cows

Changes in the C-reactive protein (CRP) and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F_2α (PGFM) concentrations of uterine lavage fluid were examined in cows given an intrauterine povidone-iodine (PI) infusion. The mean polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) ratios (the ratio of PMN to total cells) and CRP concentration of uterine lavage fluid on the day after the treatment were significantly (P<0.05) greater in the PI infusion group (PMN: 53.0 ± 32.7%, CRP: 50.2 ± 32.3 ng/mL) than in the non-treatment control group (PMN: 7.9 ± 21.9%, CRP: 17.2 ± 5.9 ng/mL), whereas there was no significant difference in the mean PGFM concentration between the two groups. The present findings suggest that the uterine CRP level is a useful biomarker of local uterine inflammation in cows.