Effects on milk production of feeding silage and three levels of sugar-beet pulp either as a mixed ration or as an ensiled blend

Twenty-one British Friesian dairy cows, in mid-lactation, were used in a seven-treatment, partially balanced change-over design experiment consisting of three periods each of 4 weeks' duration. Treatments involved offering grass silage either without a sugar-beet pulp (beet pulp) supplement (US) or supplemented with beet pulp at silage/beet pulp dry matter ratios of 80:20 (C40), 65:35 (C80) and 55:45 (C120), and offered in the form of a mixed ration. A further three treatments consisted of offering ensiled blends of silage and beet pulp, produced by mixing 40 (E40), 80 (E80) and 120 (E120)kg beet pulp t^?1 of grass at ensiling. Silage was offered ad libitum on all treatments, with cows receiving 1kg d^?1 of a concentrate supplement containing 470 g crude protein kg^?1 fresh weight. Dry matter intakes increased with increasing level of beet pulp inclusion in the diet, irrespective of method of beet pulp inclusion in the diet. Similarly, milk fat + protein yields increased with increasing level of beet pulp offered. However, when comparisons were made between the two methods of beet pulp inclusion in the diet with beet pulp requirements equivalent to those obtained in treatments C40, C80 and C120, namely 2·28, 4·53 and 6·21 kg d^?1, offering beet pulp as a supplement to an untreated silage resulted in fat + protein yields of 32 (s.e.d. 9·8), 53 (s.e.d. 19·5) and 81 (s.e.d. 21·3)gd^?1 greater than would have been achieved had equivalent quantities of beet pulp been included at ensiling as part of an ensiled blend. This effect can be attributed to the higher metabolizable energy intakes with the control silage supplemented with beet pulp at feeding, a consequence of the loss of nutrients from the beet pulp fraction during ensiling, in the case of treatments E40, E80 and E120. However, when account is taken of differences in the efficiency of recovery of edible silage dry matter between ensilage systems and differences in forage dry-matter intake between treatments, overall efficiency of feed use was not significantly different between the two systems of beet pulp inclusion in the diet.     

Silage and milk production: a comparison between barley and dried sugar-beet pulp as silage supplements

Two grass silages made from perennial ryegrass, and with D-values of 0·216 and 0·255, were offered ad libitum to 18 Ayrshire cows in two feeding experiments. On the control treatment the silages were supplemented with soybean meal only, and on the other two treatments with equal weights of DM from either barley or dried molassed sugar-beet pulp plus the same weight of soya as on the control treatment. The daily intakes of silage DM were not significantly different on the barley and beet-pulp treatments, and, on average, the intake of silage DM was reduced by 0·24 and 0·20 kg by feeding 1 kg barley and beet pulp DM respectively.
The daily milk yields were not significantly different on the barley and beet-pulp treatments with mean values of 19·2 and 19·2 kg per cow respectively compared with 17·2 kg on the control treatment. On the barley and beet-pulp treatments the fat, SNF, CP and lactose concentrations in the milk and the live weights of the cows were not significantly different. It is concluded that the barley and beet pulp had similar feeding values and replacement rates when used as supplements with grass silage, and that the two feeds were interchangeable on an equal DM basis.     

The effect of system of silage harvesting and feeding on milk production

Two silages were produced by harvesting grass either unwilted, using a direct cutting flail forage harvester (flail-direct), or wilted following precut-ting and being picked up using a meter-chop harvester (precision-wilted). Formic acid was applied at the rates of 2·45 and 2·9 1 t^-1 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. Weather conditions were difficult, both before and during harvesting with a total of 27 mm rainfall falling on the wilted herbage before ensiling. The in-silo dry matter losses were 199 and 68 g kg^-1 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. The resulting silages had mean particle lengths of 49 and 24 mm, dry matter contents of 186 and 276 g kg-^-1 and D-values of 068 and 062 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. During a 141-day feeding period commencing on 19 November, the two silages were offered to 88 British Friesian cows with a mean calving date of 21 January and divided into four groups in a 2×2 factorial design experiment. The silos were divided longitudinally and two groups of cows were self-fed the silages in situ, one for each silage type, while the other two groups were easy-fed the same silages along a feed fence. There were no significant interactions between system of silage harvesting and feeding on any of the measurements of animal performance. Animals on the flail-direct silage consumed 16% less silage dry matter and produced 10% more milk per cow than those on the precision-wilted silage treatment. The overall effect was a 12% greater milk output for each unit of grass dry matter ensiled with the flail-direct than with the precision-wilted harvesting system. System of silage feeding did not significantly influence silage intake or milk output, with the mean milk yields during the final 21 days of the study being 234 and 236 kg d^-1 (±0.30) for the self- and easy-feed systems, respectively. The effects of the treatments on milk composition, liveweight change, body condition score and total ration digestibility are also reported.     

The effects of incorporating sugar-beet pulp with herbage at ensiling on silage fermentation, effluent output and in-silo losses

Three studies were undertaken with the aim of examining in-silo losses associated with ensiling mixtures of beet pulp and herbage. In Experiment 1, first-regrowth perennial ryegrass was ensiled untreated or mixed with either 40 or 120 kg unmolassed beet pulp t^?1 fresh grass prior to ensiling. In each of Experiments 2 and 3, second-regrowth ryegrass was ensiled untreated or mixed with either 40, 80 or 120 kg unmolassed beet pulp t^?1 fresh grass prior to ensiling. Dry-matter concentrations of herbage ensiled in Experiments 1, 2 and 3 were 141, 157 and 139 g kg^?1 respectively. Time-course studies indicated a more rapid fermentation with the untreated silages. Ensiling beet pulp with herbage resulted in significant improvements in silage fermentation, reflected in reductions in silage pH and ammonia nitrogen concentrations, with these effects being pronounced at beet pulp inclusion in excess of 80kg t^?1. Beet pulp inclusion increased the dry-matter concentrations of the resulting silages while reducing crude protein, modified acid detergent fibre and gross energy concentrations. In Experiment 1 beet pulp retained 1·62 and 1·641 effluent kg^?1 at the 40 and 120kg t^?1 application rates respectively. In Experiments 2 and 3, effluent retentions were 1·40, 1·29 and 0·93 1 kg^?1 and 2·87, 2·19 and 1·781 kg^?1 at the 40, 80 and 120kg t^?1 beet pulp inclusion rates respectively. In each of Experiments 1 and 3, in-silo losses were reduced with increasing level of beet pulp inclusion, while in Experiment 2 in-silo losses were relatively unaffected by treatment. Nutrient losses in effluent were reduced by the inclusion of beet pulp in all three experiments, while nutrient losses in surface waste and invisible nutrient losses tended to increase with higher levels of beet pulp inclusion. It is concluded that the inclusion of beet pulp with herbage at ensiling can result in an improved silage fermentation and a reduction in in-silo losses, while at the same time retaining considerable quantities of effluent within the silo. However, with herbage dry-matter concentrations below 160gkg^?1, beet pulp inclusion in excess of 120 kg t^?1 herbage would be required to eliminate effluent production totally.     

Silage and milk production: a comparison between soya, groundnut and single-cell protein as silage supplements

Grass silage made in May from S24 perennial ryegrass was offered ad libitum to twelve Ayrshire cows in a 12-week feeding experiment. The silage had a DM concentration of 217 g kg ^-1, contained 147 g crude protein per kg DM and had a D-value of 64·6. In addition each cow consumed 1 kg hay per d plus concentrate supplements of dried sugar-beet pulp with (A) soya bean meal, (B)‘Pruteen’, a single-cell protein (C) groundnut cake. The three concentrate supplements each contained 250 g crude protein per kg DM and were offered at the rate of 2·9 kg per 10 kg milk. The daily intakes of silage DM were 8·38, 7·94 and 7·49 kg on treatments A, B and C, respectively, with the extreme values being significantly different. The mean daily yields of milk on treatments A and B were both 16·2 kg per cow, and were significantly higher than the yield of 15·2 kg per cow on treatment C. The fat and lactose contents of the milk on the three treatments were not significantly different, but the CP content on treatment C was significantly lower than that on the other treatments. It is concluded that soya bean meal and‘Pruteen’were superior to groundnut cake as a protein supplement in a silage-based ration.     

Effects of conservation method and access time on silage intake and milk production in dairy cows

The effects of the time of access to feed (8 h or 24 h) with silage-based rations (unwilted or wilted silage) were studied for two years. In each year the experiment comprised 52 individually fed cows in a 2 × 2 factorial design and covered weeks 1-20 of the lactation. The cows were offered silage ad libitum , 1 kg of hay per day, and concentrate according to the predicted energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield.
Increasing the access time from 8 h to 24 h increased the total intake of dry matter (DM) and metabolizable energy (ME) by 6%. This resulted in increased yield of ECM by 5%. The eating rate of forage was significantly increased by restricted time of access. Wilting had no significant effect on total feed intake or milk yield. The importance of providing a sufficient length of time during which the cows have access to feed was confirmed. It was concluded that 8 h d⁻¹ of access to silage-based rations is not enough in early lactation.     

The influence of the system of silage harvesting and feeding and the use of protected protein on milk production

The study compared two systems of silage harvesting, direct-cutting flail harvesting (flail-direct) or pre-cutting, followed by wilting and collection by a meter-chop harvester (precision-wilted). Each silage was self or easy fed to dairy cows. In addition, the response to protected soya bean meal included in the supplementary concentrate was also examined. Approximately 400 t of each of the two silages were produced from the same swards under good weather conditions with formic acid applied as an additive. The resulting silages were well preserved and had mean particle lengths of 43 and 29-mm, and D-values of 0-74 and 0-71 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. During a 159-d feeding period commencing on 5 November, the silages were offered to 88 British Friesian cows in a 2³ factorial design, continuous feeding experiment. The cows calved during the experiment and had a mean calving date of 18 January. The feeding treatments involved both silage types, two systems of silage feeding (self and easy) and two sources of protein in the supplementary concentrate given after calving (soya bean or 100 g kg^-1 protected soya bean). No concentrates were offered pre-calving and all animals were given 7.6 kg d^-1 concentrates post-calving. There were no significant interactions between the system of silage harvesting and feeding. Animals on the precision-wilted silage consumed 14% more silage dry matter (10.9 vs. 9.6 kg DM d^-1) over the total period and by the end of the experiment were producing 7% less milk per day (25.4 vs. 27.2 kg). However, the responses in the output of total milk constituents (fat and protein) were lower than those obtained in milk yield. Animals offered silage by self feeding had similar dry matter intakes, but produced marginally less milk than those easy-fed. Ration digestibility and nitrogen utilization data, obtained from a concurrent change-over design experiment, suggested that the energy from the precision-wilted silage was less efficiently utilized for milk production. There was no significant response in either milk yield or composition to the inclusion of protected soya bean in the supplement.     

Effects of feeding clover silages on feed intake, milk production and digestion in dairy cows

Silages were made from pure crops of perennial ryegrass, red clover and white clover over 2 years. In all but one case the silage was stored as bales. A silage additive specially adapted for bales (Kofasil Ultra^TM) was used for all silages and they were all of good hygienic quality. The additive contained sodium nitrite, hexamethylene, tetraamine sodium bensoate and sodium propionate. The silages were offered ad libitum, either pure or mixed [grass/clover 0·50/0·50 on a dry‐matter (DM) basis] with a fixed amount (8 kg) of concentrate. Two experiments, one in each year, were performed with high‐yielding multiparous dairy cows in mid‐lactation, and both rumen‐cannulated and intact cows were used. The experiments were carried out using an incomplete changeover design with fifteen cows and five treatments each year. The cows consumed large quantities of these silages (12·7–16·3 kg DM per cow per day). The highest intakes were obtained when the red clover and the 0·50 red clover:0·50 perennial ryegrass silage diets were offered. However, there was a difference between years. In year 1, 0·50 red clover:0·50 perennial ryegrass and 0·50 white clover:0·50 perennial ryegrass silage diets showed the highest intakes while pure perennial ryegrass and white clover silage diets gave lower intakes. In year 2 the highest intake of silage was obtained when the diet containing silage from red clover from a second cut was offered, while the silage from red clover from a first cut gave the lowest intake. The voluntary intakes of silages from white clover and perennial ryegrass were intermediate. No cases of bloat or other digestive disturbances were observed. Milk yield was significantly lower for the perennial ryegrass silage diet compared with all other diets in year 1. In year 2 milk yield was highest for the white clover silage diets and lowest for the red clover silage diets from both cuts. In year 1 there were relatively small differences in milk composition while in year 2 milk fat content was significantly lower with white clover silage diet and milk protein content was significantly higher with the perennial ryegrass diet. The overall conclusion from these experiments was that cows were able to consume large quantities of pure legume silage without serious disturbance to their metabolism. Differences in measurements of rumen metabolism were found between diets and especially between years. Milk production differences appears to be coupled to both differences in rumen physical characteristics, such as passage rate and particle size as well as differences in volatile fatty acid production in the rumen.     

Silage and milk production: comparisons between hays of different digestibilities as silage supplements

In three separate feeding experiments using a total of thirty individually-housed Ayrshire cows three silages made from perennial ryegrass were given ad libitum together with supplements of four different hays in the long form. The in vitro D-values of the silages ranged from 0·298 to 0·283, and the hays from 0·280 to 0·200. The daily intake of hay DM varied from 0·2 to 4·2 kg per cow and was given either without or with a daily maximum of 2·2 kg concentrate DM containing 379–527 g CP per kg DM. On average, 1 kg hay DM decreased silage intake by 0·24 kg DM with a range of 0·21–1·20 kg. The hay supplements had only small and non-significant effects on total DM intake, milk yield and milk composition, but increased the daily intake of drinking water. In three behavioural studies, the eating and ruminating times expressed as min per kg DM did not differ significantly between the various supplement treatments. It is concluded that hay has only a marginal value as a supplement for grass silage, although the hay could serve as a useful 'buffer' feed if the amount of silage was limited.     

Silage and milk production: a comparison between long, chopped and ground hays as supplements to silage of high digestibility

Grass silage made in May from S24 perennial ryegrass had a DM concentration of 262 g kg^-1 and an in vitro D-value of 0·698, and was given ad libitum to twelve Ayrshire cows in a 16-week feeding experiment. In addition supplements of hay with a mean in vitro D-value of 0·603 were offered in one of three forms—long, chopped (12·1 mm) or ground (0·80 modulus of fineness) and cubed—and of concentrates given at either 2 or 4 kg per 10 kg milk. Hay averaged 18·2% of total forage DM intake with mean daily intakes of 1·28, 1·22 and 2·26 kg DM per cow in the long, short and ground forms respectively. The highest daily intakes of forage, i.e. silage plus hay, occurred on the ground hay treatments, with values of 10·24 and 9·25 kg DM per cow on the 2 and 4 kg concentrate treatments respectively. The mean daily milk yields were 18·2,18·2 and 19·2 kg per cow on the long, short and ground hay treatments respectively but the increase in yield with the ground hay was only significant at the low level of concentrate intake. The hay treatments had small and non-significant effects on milk composition. It is concluded that ground hay was superior to either long or chopped hay as a supplement for silage, but the small advantages depended on the level of concentrate intake.     

Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri as a silage inoculant or probiotic on in vitro organic matter digestibility,gas production and volatile fatty acids of low dry‐matter whole‐crop maize silage

Our objective was to investigate Lactobacillus buchneri as a silage inoculant or probiotic on in vitro ruminal measurements of low dry‐matter whole‐crop maize silage. In vitro gas production was conducted using untreated (without inoculant) and inoculated (treated with L. buchneri CNCM I‐4323 at 1 × 10⁵ cfu g^?1 of fresh forage) maize silages (wet‐ground) incubated with three different ruminal inocula, in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement. Ruminal fluids were collected from wethers consuming (i) untreated maize silage (RF‐U); (ii) inoculated maize silage (RF‐I); and (iii) untreated maize silage with a daily dose of L. buchneri CNCM I‐4323 administered directly into the rumen (1 × 10⁷ cfu g^?1 of supplied silage [LB‐probiotic]). Gas production was consistently higher when inoculated silage was used as the substrate of fermentation, compared to the untreated silage. When untreated silage was used as substrate, the total volatile fatty acid concentration was higher using RF‐I and LB‐probiotic inocula, compared to the RF‐U inoculum, at 9 hr and at 48 hr of fermentation. It is concluded that L. buchneri should be used as a silage inoculant rather than as a probiotic because it alters fermentation within the silo thereby improving silage quality and enabling some benefits for ruminal fermentation.     

Silage and milk production: a comparison between additives for silage of high digestibility

Three grass silages made in early June from S23 perennial ryegrass were compared in a 16-week feeding experiment with twelve Ayrshire cows. The silages were made from uniform herbage which received either formic acid (‘Add-F’) at the rate of 201 t^?1, or a formalin-sulphuric acid mixture (‘Syiade’) at rates of 2.0 and 4.4 1 t^?1. The silages were offered ad libitum either alone or supplemented with a cube containing 38% CP in the DM at the rate of 1.4 kg per 10 kg milk. The daily intakes of silage DM were not significantly different on the three silage treatments, and averaged 10.7, 11.0 and 11.0 kg per cow on the formic acid and the 2.0 and 44 1 t^?1 formalin-acid treatments respectively. The mean daily yields of milk were 15.1, 13.3 and 13.7 kg per cow in the unsupplemented treatments, and 18.2, 18.1 and 18.0 kg per cow in the supplemented treatments on the formic acid and the 2.0 and 44 1 t^?1 formalin-acid treatments respectively. On the basis of total animal production expressed in terms of metabolizable energy requirements, it was concluded that the differences between the three silages were small.     

Effects of feeding different ensiled forages on the productivity and nutrient-use efficiency of finishing lambs

The effects of offering ensiled red clover (Trifolium pratense), lucerne (Medicago sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), kale (Brassica oleracea) and hybrid ryegrass (Lolium hybridicum) on the productivity and nutrient‐use efficiency of lambs were investigated. Forages were cut, wilted for 24 h and ensiled as round bales. A hundred Suffolk‐cross lambs, aged 8 months, were offered grass silage during a 5‐week standardization period and then group‐housed for 14 d and offered ad libitum access to a treatment silage. For the measurement period, lambs were split into four replicate groups of five lambs per treatment. Dry matter intake and live weight were recorded every 7 d over 56 d. The chemical composition of the silages differed for all the variables measured. Lambs offered pea silage had a very low liveweight gain and this treatment was discontinued after 21 d. Lambs offered the other forages had a higher liveweight gain than lambs offered ryegrass silage (P < 0·001). Food conversion and nitrogen‐use efficiency were higher in lambs offered the red clover, lucerne and kale silages compared with those offered ensiled ryegrass (P < 0·001). These findings demonstrate the potential for using ensiled alternative forages rather than ryegrass to increase the productivity and nutrient use efficiency of livestock systems.     

Effects of applying a bacterial inoculant to silage immediately before feeding on silage intake, digestibility, degradability and rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations in growing beef cattle

In an experiment, involving twelve male cattle (initially 235 kg live weight), the effects of applying lactic acid bacteria [Lactobacillus plantarum; 10⁹ colony-forming units (g fresh silage)^?1] to grass silage, immediately prior to that silage being fed, on dry-matter (DM) intake of the silage, degradability of nitrogen (N) and fibre in the rumen, total tract digestibility and composition of rumen fluid in the animals were examined. A grass silage, which had been made from the primary growth of a predominantly perennial ryegrass sward, was offered as the sole diet. The inoculant was applied to the silage at the rate of 2 g of freeze-dried powder reconstituted in 12 ml of water (kg fresh silage)^?1 immediately prior to that silage being fed and an equivalent amount of water was applied to the silage in the control treatment. The two diets were compared in a change-over design. The silage was well preserved, having a pH and concentrations of ammonia N and butyrate of 3.72, 74 g (kg total N)^?1 and 0.11 g (kg DM)^?1 respectively. Application of the inoculant significantly increased true protein, acid-insoluble N and water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations (P < 0.001) in the diet. Silage DM intake was not significantly increased (P= 0.072) by this of inoculant treatment, which had no significant effect (P > 0.05) on rumen degradability or total tract digestibility of DM, N, neutral detergent fibre or modified acid detergent fibre. Rumen pH, ammonia concentration or the molar proportions of volatile fatty acids were not altered (P>0.05) by inoculant treatment. It is concluded that application of the inoculant to the silage prior to silage being fed did not significantly affect silage DM intake, total tract digestibility, or degradability or fermentation in the rumen of cattle offered grass silage as the sole diet. It is also concluded that the results of this experiment provide no evidence that the mode of action of L plantarum, applied as an additive to grass at ensiling in previous studies, is through ‘direct’ effects in the rumen.     

A comparison of milk yields and methane production from three contrasting high‐yielding dairy cattle feeding regimes: Cut‐and‐carry,partial grazing and total mixed ration

There have been reductions in grazing cattle and corresponding increases in mixed diets across many regions. Mixed diets consist of silage, grains, legumes and other herbaceous plants (termed total mixed ration, TMR). TMR has been associated with increased milk yields but has also been linked to increased enteric methane production. We measured milk yields and methane production from high‐yielding Holstein‐Friesian cattle after substituting 29%–36% of a TMR diet with grass. Two feeding treatments were compared with a diet of TMR: grass grazed at pasture and grass cut in the field and delivered to housed cattle (termed cut‐and‐carry). Each feeding treatment was fed to 15 cattle, and the experiment was conducted in South‐west Scotland. Using a laser methane detector, we measured a twofold and fourfold decline in enteric methane production for the cut‐and‐carry and grazing groups, respectively, when the animals consumed grass. TMR was consumed by both grass‐fed groups overnight, so daily values were adjusted to include elevated methane production during this period. This revealed that methane production for the cut‐and‐carry and grazing groups was 17% and 39% lower than for the TMR‐fed group respectively. Milk yields were maintained for all three groups, and the efficiency of milk production per unit of methane was substantially greater for the two grass‐fed groups. A shift away from exclusively feeding TMR by adding fresh grass to the diets of cattle could contribute to meeting emissions targets and could also represent an economically sustainable climate change mitigation strategy.     

A study of the efficacy of a bacterial inoculant and formic acid as additives for grass silage in terms of milk production

In a two-year experiment, three silages were prepared from herbage treated either with an inoculant at 1·25 × 10⁵ organisms (g fresh material (FM))⁻¹. formic acid (850 g kg⁻¹) at 4 1 (t FM)⁻¹, or no additive (untreated). In Experiment 1, unwilted and in Experiment 2, wilted silages were investigated and had mean dry matter (DM) and water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) concentrations at ensiling of 171 g kg⁻¹ and 17·6 g (kg FM)⁻¹ and 263 g kg⁻¹ and 25·1 g (kg FM)⁻¹, respectively. In Experiment 1, 45 and in Experiment 2, 54 individually fed cows were used to evaluate the silages in three-treatment, randomized-block design experiments. During weeks 4-12 of lactation the cows were offered silages ad libitum and during weeks 15-26 a constant amount of silage was fed. There were few major differences in chemical composition of the resulting silages. Formic acid had no effect on silage digestibility. Inoculant treatment increased digestibility when the grass had been wilted. The use of formic acid resulted in increased silage DM intake of 9% during weeks 4-12 of lactation in Experiment 1 but not in Experiment 2. The inoculant gave no increase in silage DM intake over the control in Experiment 1 but increased silage DM intake by 7% in Experiment 2. There was no significant response in milk yield to formic acid. In Experiment 2 the response in milk yield to inoculant treatment was significant both in weeks 4-12 of lactation (4%) and in weeks 15-26 of lactation (5%). It is concluded that the response in milk yield to the use of a specific inoculant appears to be mediated through increased intake of metabolizable energy (ME).     

Effect on upland beef production of incorporating winter feeding of red clover silage or summer grazing of Molinia-dominated semi-natural pastures

Management systems for finishing beef cattle, designed to meet environmental goals in the Less Favoured Areas (LFAs) of the UK, often rely on the integration of grazing of semi‐natural pastures with sown permanent pasture. In this experiment, three management options were compared: (i) permanent pasture for grazing and silage production (treatment PP), (ii) permanent pasture for grazing and silage and grazing of Molinia‐dominant semi‐natural pasture in summer from June to August inclusively (treatment PP + SNP) and (iii) permanent pasture for grazing and silage and red clover (RC) silage for 0·25 of the silage requirement in winter (treatment PP + RC). The performance of spring‐born Welsh Black steers was measured from turnout in spring 2002 until finishing in summer 2003. During summer 2002, the liveweight gain of steers grazing the semi‐natural pasture was significantly lower than that of steers grazing the permanent pasture. There was a trend for the liveweight gains of the steers on the PP + SNP treatment to be higher from housing in autumn 2002, and live weights on all treatments were similar at the start of the red clover‐feeding phase. Steers offered red clover silage had a significantly higher liveweight gains than those offered grass silage, but there was only a trend for a higher live weight at the end of the winter‐feeding period. During summer 2003, liveweight gains were again higher on the permanent pasture. Finishing system significantly affected the fatty‐acid profile of the meat produced, but there was no difference in the colour of meat in relation to shelf‐life. Lipid oxidation was less for the meat from steers on the PP + SNP treatment than on the PP treatment, which, in turn, was less than for meat from the steers on the PP + RC treatment, and was in inverse proportion to the vitamin E concentration in the loin muscle. There were no significant differences in sensory panel scores for texture, juiciness or flavour of the meat.     

Silage and milk production. A comparision between barley and groundnut cake as supplements to silage of high digestibility

Grass silage of hjgh digestibility made in late May from S23 perennial ryegrass was offered to twelve Ayrshire cows in a 16-week winter-feeding experiment. The silage had a DM content of 27.2% and contained 147% crude protein and 70.3% digestible organic matter in the DM. The silage was fed ad libitum and was the sole feed in the control treatment. In the other three treatments the silage was supplemented with barley, groundnut cake or a mixture of barley and groundnut supplying 4.7, 1.5 and 4.7 kg DM per cow per day respectively. The daily intakes of silage DM were 10.8 kg per cow in the control treatment and 8.6, 11.1 and 9.3 kg per cow in the barley, groundnut and barley plus groundnut treatments, respectively. The daily yields of milk were 14.6 kg per cow in the control, and 16.1, 17.6 and 17.9 kg per cow in the three supplement treatments, respectively. The fat content of the milk was highest in the barley treatment, whereas the SNF and CP contents were highest in the barley plus groundnut treatment. It is concluded that with a high digestibility silage, a supplement of groundnut cake was superior to barley for milk production.     

Mixing whole-crop pea–oat silage and grass–clover silage: positive effects on intake and milk production of dairy cows

Forty‐eight high‐yielding dairy cows of the Swedish Red breed were used to examine the effects of providing pea–oat silage (P), grass–clover silage (G) and a 0·50:0·50 mixture of the silages (M) ad libitum in diets with two concentrate levels (7 or 10 kg d^?1). A 9‐week experiment, including a 2‐week pre‐experimental period in which the cows were all fed the same diet, and an in vivo apparent digestibility study were conducted comparing the six dietary treatments (M7, M10, P7, P10, G7, G10). Intake and digestibility of the diets and milk production and live weight of the cows were measured. The G silage [11·3 MJ ME kg^?1 dry matter (DM)] was first‐cut grass herbage wilted for 24 h prior to addition of an additive, containing formic acid, propionic acid and ammonia, at 4 L t^?1 fresh matter (FM). The P forage was cut when the peas were at pod fill and ensiled directly with 6 L t^?1 FM of the same additive. The main hypothesis tested, that cows fed the M silage would produce more milk than the cows fed either the P or the G silages, was confirmed. The cows fed the M7 dietary treatment had similar milk yield and milk composition to cows offered the M10, G10 and P10 dietary treatments, and cows offered the G7 and P7 dietary treatments had lower milk and milk protein yields. This suggested that a mixed ration of pea–oat bi‐crop and grass–clover silage has a concentrate‐sparing effect, and that the use of pea–oat bi‐crop and grass–clover silage as a mixed ration for high‐yielding dairy cows can be recommended.     

Silage and milk production: a comparison between concentrates containing different amounts of protected protein as supplements for silage of high digestibility

Grass silage made in late May from S24 perennial ryegrass was offered ad libitum to eight Ayshire cows in a 16-week feeding experiment. The silage had a DM concentration of 244 g kg⁻¹, contained 163 g crude protein (kg DM)⁻¹ with a ruminal degradability of 0.77 and had an in vitro DOMD concentration of 678 g kg⁻¹. In addition, four concentrates each containing 167 g soya-bean meal kg⁻¹ were consumed at a mean daily rate of 6.43 kg DM per cow. The soya-bean meal was either untreated, or 'protected' by formalin and mixed in the following proportions, 100:0; 66:34; 34:66; and 0:100 respectively, in the four concentrates. The daily intakes of silage DM were not significantly different on the four treatments and averaged 90 kg DM per cow, giving a mean total daily DM intake of 32.4 g kg⁻¹ live weight. The milk yields were not significantly different on the four treatments and averaged 23.9 kg ⁻¹ The treatments had small and non-significant effects on milk composition and live weight. It is concluded that with a high-digestibility, well-preserved grass silage of satisfactory protein content the inclusion of 'protected' protein in the supplementary concentrate had no beneficial effects on milk production.