A comparison between the v‐gel supraglottic airway device and the cuffed endotracheal tube for airway management in spontaneously breathing cats during isoflurane anaesthesia

ObjectiveTo compare airway management using the v-gel supraglottic airway device (v-gel SGAD) to that using an endotracheal tube (ETT), with respect to practicability, leakage of volatile anaesthetics and upper airway discomfort in cats.Study designProspective, randomized clinical trial.AnimalsTwenty European Shorthair cats (9 males, 11 females), weighing 3.3 ± 0.7 kg.MethodsCats were randomly allocated to one of two groups, in which the airway was managed by either the v-gel SGAD or a cuffed ETT, and anaesthetized for neutering procedures. The dose of propofol necessary to insert the ETT or v-gel SGAD; time from the first injection of propofol to the first clinically acceptable reading on the capnograph; leakage of isoflurane around the airway device; and upper airway discomfort scores during recovery and during the first 24 hours after anaesthesia were recorded. Continuous and discrete variables were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U-test and the Pearson chi-squared test, respectively. Results were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.ResultsTime from the first injection of propofol to the first clinically acceptable reading on the capnograph was significantly shorter in the v-gel group. The ETT group showed significantly more stridor during recovery. No other significant differences were found.Conclusions and clinical relevanceAirway management with the v-gel SGAD is a sound and practicable alternative to endotracheal intubation with an ETT. However, larger prospective trials will be needed to draw firm conclusions on the benefits and/or drawbacks of the use of v-gel SGAD for airway management in cats.     

Evaluation of laryngeal mask as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in cats anesthetized under spontaneous or controlled ventilation

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cardiorespiratory effects and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux with the use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or endotracheal tube (ET) in anesthetized cats during spontaneous (SV) or controlled ventilation (CV). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized experimental trial. ANIMALS: Thirty-two adult crossbred cats, weighing 2.7 +/- 0.4 kg. METHODS: The cats were sedated with intramuscular (IM) methotrimeprazine (0.5 mg kg(-1)) and buprenorphine (0.005 mg kg(-1)), followed 30 minutes later by induction of anesthesia with intravenous (IV) thiopental (12.5-20 mg kg(-1)). An ET was used in 16 cats and an LMA in the remaining 16 animals. Anesthesia was maintained with 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (0.6%) of halothane in oxygen using a Mapleson D breathing system. Cats in both groups were further divided into two equal groups (n = 8), undergoing either SV or CV. Neuromuscular blockade with pancuronium (0.06 mg kg(-1)) was used to facilitate CV. Heart and respiratory rates, direct arterial blood pressure, capnometry (PE'CO2) and arterial blood gases were measured. Gastric reflux and possible aspiration was investigated by intragastric administration of 5 mL of radiographic contrast immediately after induction of anesthesia. Cervical and thoracic radiographs were taken at the end of anesthesia. Data were analyzed using anova followed by Student-Newman-Keuls, Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test where appropriate. RESULTS: Values for PaCO2 and PE'CO2 were higher in spontaneously breathing cats with the LMA when compared with other groups. Values of PaO2 and hemoglobin oxygen saturation did not differ between groups. Gastroesophageal reflux occurred in four of eight and two of eight cats undergoing CV with ET or LMA, respectively. There was no tracheal or pulmonary aspiration in any cases. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of an LMA may be used as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in anesthetized cats. Although aspiration was not observed, gastric reflux may occur in mechanically ventilated animals.     

Use of laryngeal mask airway compared to endotracheal tube with positive-pressure ventilation in anesthetized swine

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ease of placement and ventilatory parameters of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with an endotracheal tube (ETT) in anesthetized swine during positive-pressure ventilation (PPV). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, experimental trial. ANIMALS: Nine young domestic swine, weighing between 40 and 49 kg (mean 45.1 kg), being used for a separate terminal surgical study. METHODS: The pigs were immobilized with tiletamine/zolazepam, 2.7-3.6 mg kg(-1), intramuscularly, followed by isoflurane in oxygen delivered by facemask. The lungs were mechanically ventilated through an ETT or an LMA, in random order, during the anesthetic period. Positive-pressure ventilation was adjusted to maintain end-tidal CO2 (Pe'CO2) between 35 and 45 mmHg, with peak inspiratory pressure (P(insp)) of 15-23 cmH2O. Buprenorphine, 0.3 mg intramuscularly, was given to each pig after instrumentation. Isoflurane vaporizer settings were adjusted to maintain a surgical plane of anesthesia. Respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume (V(E)), and Pe'CO2 were measured and recorded at 5-minute intervals. After the collection of 1 hour of data, the alternate airway was placed. Swine were given at least 30 minutes to stabilize and another hour of data were recorded. At the time of airway placement, the ease of placement was assessed based on time and the number of personnel required. Data were analyzed using paired Student's t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test where appropriate. RESULTS: Laryngeal mask airways were significantly easier to place than ETT. Values for V(T) and V(E) were not significantly different between treatments. Peak inspiratory pressures were higher in ETT-ventilated swine. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An LMA may be used as an alternative to an ETT in mechanically-ventilated anesthetized swine. Use of an LMA may reduce time and personnel required for placement of an airway.     

Gastro-oesophageal reflux during anaesthesia in the kitten: comparison between use of a laryngeal mask airway or an endotracheal tube

Objective  To compare the incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) during anaesthesia in the kitten when using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or an endotracheal tube (ET).
Study design  Prospective randomized cross-over experimental study.
Animals  Forty Domestic Short Hair laboratory cats, 19 females and 21 males, aged 12–15 weeks and weighing 0.57–1.73 kg (mean 1.13 ± SD 0.26).
Methods  Kittens were anaesthetized twice, once using the LMA and once the ET. Following induction of anaesthesia with isoflurane in an anaesthetic chamber and intubation of the trachea with the ET or placement of the LMA, a pH-electrode was introduced into the lower oesophagus. Monitoring of the oesophageal pH was performed for 45 minutes while anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane. At the end of the experiment, gastric pH was measured. Kittens that had GOR during the experiment were treated with sucralfate, cisapride and ranitidine for 15 days.
Results  Oesophageal pH was 6.51 ± 0.76 and gastric pH was 1.54 ± 0.59. GOR was observed in nine kittens when the ET was used, and in 20 kittens when the LMA was used, the difference being significant ( p  =   0.013). The refluxate nearly always was acidic, being alkaline in only one kitten. Most of the GOR episodes occurred shortly after induction of anaesthesia and the oesophageal pH remained below 4.0 until the end of the experiment. No regurgitation was observed.
Conclusions and clinical relevance  The use of the LMA is associated with an increased incidence of GOR during anaesthesia in the kitten, which is not detected by observation. That this may have occurred should be considered if the kitten demonstrates signs of oesophagitis in the postoperative period.     

Regional distribution of ventilation in horses in dorsal recumbency during spontaneous and mechanical ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography: a case series

ObjectiveTo evaluate the regional distribution of ventilation in horses during spontaneous breathing and controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) using electrical impedance tomography (EIT).Study designProspective, experimental case series.AnimalsFour anaesthetized experimental horses.MethodsHorses were anaesthetized with isoflurane in an oxygen-air mixture and medetomidine continuous rate infusion, placed in dorsal recumbency with an EIT belt around the thorax, and allowed to breathe spontaneously until PaCO₂ reached 13.3 kPa (100 mmHg), when volume CMV was started. For each horse, the EIT signal was recorded for at least 2 minutes immediately before (T1), and at 30 (n = 3) or 60 (n = 1) minutes after the start of CMV (T2). The centre of ventilation (CoV), dependent silent spaces (DSS) (likely to represent atelectatic lung areas), non-dependent silent spaces (NSS) (likely to represent lung areas with low ventilation) and total ventilated area (TVA) were evaluated. Cardiac output (CO) was measured and venous admixture and oxygen delivery (DO₂) were calculated at T1 and T2. Data are presented as median and range.ResultsAfter the initiation of CMV, the CoV moved ventrally towards the non-dependent lung by 10% [from 57.4% (49.6–60.2%) to 48.3% (41.9–54.4%)]. DSS increased [from 4.1% (0.2–13.9%) to 18.7% (7.5–27.5%)], while NSS [21.7% (9.4–29.2%) to 9.9% (1.0–20.7%)] and TVA [920 (699–1051) to 837 (662–961) pixels] decreased. CO, venous admixture and DO₂ also decreased.Conclusions and clinical relevanceIn spontaneously breathing anaesthetized horses in dorsal recumbency, ventilation was essentially centred within the dependent dorsal lung regions and moved towards non-dependent ventral regions as soon as CMV was started. This shows a major lack of ventilation in the dependent lung, which may be indicative of atelectasis.