Reproductive performance of post-partum anoestrous dairy cows treated with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate

Abstract

Extract

Recent studies have shown that the anoestrous condition of post-partum dairy cows can be treated with a combination of progesterone (for 5–7 days) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB, 1 mg injected at 24 or 48 h after termination of the progesterone treatment)(1) McDougall, S, and Macmillan, KL. 1993. Follicle waves, ovulation and oestrus in the postpartum cow. Proceedings of the 13th Seminar for the Society of Dairy Cattle Veterinarians of the New Zealand Veterinary Association, : 33–47.  [Google Scholar]. However, published data on the performance of this anoestrus treatment programme in commercial dairy herds is limited(2) Macmillan, KL,, Taufa, VK,, Day, AM, and McDougall, S. 1995. Some effects of using progesterone and oestradiol benzoate to stimulate oestrus and ovulation m dairy cows with anovulatory anoestrus. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 55: 239–241.  [Google Scholar]. During the 1994–95 and 1995–96 breeding seasons, performance of this anoestrus treatment programme was determined in nine and six spring-calving herds, respectively. In each herd, cows that had not been detected in oestrus using the tailpainting technique by Day -7 (Day 0 = start of the breeding season) were examined per rectum by each herd owner's attending veterinarian for the presence of a palpable corpus luteum (CL) on the ovary. Cows with a palpable CL or with an enlarged or infected uterus were excluded. Throughout the trial period, anoestrous cows were managed together with the cycling cows.     

Treatment of post-partum anoestrous dairy cows with progesterone, oestradiol and equine chorionic gonadotropin

Anoestrus in lactating dairy cows at the start of the breeding season is a major form of reproductive wastage for seasonal dairy production based on pasture. The objective of this study was to compare the reproductive performance of anoestrous cows that were treated with a combination of progesterone, oestradiol and equine chorionic gonadotrophin either 10 days before (T-10, n = 2 19) or 16 days after (T+16, n = 229) the start of the breeding season. A higher percentage of cows in the T-10 group were detected in oestrus and inseminated during the first 6 days of breeding than those in the T+16 group (69.4% v. 26.2%. p <0.001). However, the percentage of cows detected in oestrus by Day 16 was similar between the two treatment groups (T10 v. T+ 16; 77.7% v. 76.7%). There was no difference between treatment groups in conception rate to the first (51.2% v. 59.0%) or the second insemination (50.8% v. 57.6%), in pregnancy rate over the first 49 days (74.0% v. 75.1%), in empty rate (10.0% v. 10.5%) or in the mean day of conception from the start of the breeding season (24.0 v. 25.7 days). These results suggest that, under favourable environmental conditions, treatment of anoestrous cows with the programme used in this trial can be performed 16 days after the start of the breeding season with similar results to that performed 10 days before the start of the breeding season. Further studies are needed to determine if this is the case under different environmental conditions or for other treatment programmes.     

Treatment of suckling beef cattle with a progestagen sponge and oestradiol benzoate or equine chorionic gonadotrophin

The ovarian responses of anoestrus beef cows to a combined treatment with medroxy-progesterone acetate (MAP) sponges and oestradiol benzoate or equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) were evaluated. Forty-five suckling Hereford cows were allocated to three equal groups. Group 1 received a MAP sponge for seven days plus an injection of 2 mg oestradiol benzoate when the sponge was inserted (day 0) and 1 mg when the sponge was withdrawn; group 2 received identical treatment until day 7, when a dose of 400 iu of eCG was administered, and group 3 were left untreated as control animals. From day 0 to day 11 the cows' ovaries were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography, and their oestrous behaviour was observed from 24 hours to 96 hours after the sponge was removed. Data from cows that had a corpus luteum present before the sponge was withdrawn were not used in subsequent analyses; there were four in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3. In 19 of the 21 cows in groups 1 and 2 a new follicular wave was observed to emerge at a mean (sd) interval of 3.9 (0.3) days after the insertion of the sponge, whereas in group 3 it occurred in all 11 cows after 3.4 (0.6) days. Only the six cows that had a follicle of 9 mm or larger in diameter ovulated (P < or = 0.001). Nine of the 11 cows in group 1 came into oestrus, compared with two of the 10 in group 2 and none of the control cows (P < or = 0.001). Ovulation was observed in four, two and none of the cows in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively.     

Comparison of two doses of oestradiol benzoate administered at a resynchronised oestrus on reproductive performance of dairy cows

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two doses of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) administered as part of a treatment designed to resynchronise returns to oestrus on the reproductive performance of cows in a controlled breeding program. DESIGN: Cohort study. PROCEDURE: Lactating dairy cows on two farms were treated to synchronise three successive oestrous cycles. An intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP4) was used to synchronise the first oestrous cycle. The cows were then treated 15 days after the first treatment by reinsertion of an IVP4 that had been used to synchronise the first oestrus and administration of 1.0 mg of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) i.m. at device insertion. The IVP4 device was removed 8 days later and either 0.5 (n = 421) or 1.0 mg of ODB (n = 446) was administered 24 h later. Injections of (ODB) with or without the use of an IVP4 were used to synchronise the third oestrous cycle. Different synchronisation treatments were used to synchronise first and third oestrous cycles but differences were included in statistical models to account for variation in the data. This enabled examination of effects due to differences in the dose of ODB used to synchronise the second synchronised oestrus. RESULTS: The dose of ODB (0.5 or 1.0 mg) administered just before the second synchronised oestrus did not significantly (P > 0.10) affect the cumulative pregnancy rates over three successive rounds of artificial insemination, the mating start date to the conception intervals, the conception rates to the first or second insemination, the proportion of cows submitted for insemination at the second synchronised oestrus or the proportion of cows that were not pregnant yet failed to show signs of oestrous (phantom cows) identified within each herd. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in reproductive performance between cows receiving either 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg ODB after removal of used IVP4 devices that had been inserted to resynchronise them for a second insemination.     

Effects of body condition and estradiol on luteinizing hormone secretion in post-partum beef cows

An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that the effect of body fatness on LH pulsatility in post-partum cows is entirely independent of the negative feedback effects of ovarian steroids. Forty beef cows were fed in the last 100 d of gestation so that they achieved either a thin (mean score 1.97) or fat (mean score 2.79) body condition (0 to 5 scale) at calving and were fed after calving to maintain live weight and body condition. At 15 (sd 3.7) d post partum all cows were ovariectomised and half from each body condition score treatment group received a subcutaneous estradiol implant (+EST) while the remainder received no implant (−EST). At weeks 5 and 9 post-partum blood samples were collected via jugular catheter every 20 minutes for 10 hr on two consecutive d and on the third d cows were injected via the jugular vein with 2.5 μg GnRH. Blood samples were collected every 15 minutes for 1 hr before and 2 hr after GnRH injection. At 5 and 9 weeks the fatter cows had significantly higher mean LH concentrations, baseline LH concentrations, LH pulse amplitudes and pulse frequencies (P<0.01). Implantation with estradiol in both fat and thin cows reduced mean LH concentrations, baseline LH concentrations, LH pulse amplitudes and pulse frequencies (P<0.001). The lack of interaction between body condition and the presence or absence of estradiol implies that the effect of body condition on LH release is independent of ovarian steroid feedback mechanisms. Fat cows showed a greater release of LH in response to exogenous GnRH (P<0.01) than thin cows while implantation with estradiol in both fat and thin cows decreased (P<0.01) LH release. The pituitary responsiveness to GnRH with the −EST cows was greater at 9 compared to 5 weeks, but there was no difference with time in the +EST cows. However, there was no such interaction in endogenous LH pulse amplitude suggesting that in the absence of estradiol the magnitude of GnRH pulses declined with time post-partum.     

Effects of GnRH treatment on initiation of pulses of LH,LH release,and subsequent concentrations of progesterone

Progesterone is essential for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. One proposed method to increase progesterone is administering GnRH at insemination. However, this method has resulted in conflicting results. Therefore, 2 experiments were conducted to evaluate how administering GnRH at insemination affected pulses of luteinizing hormone (LH) and subsequent progesterone. In Experiment 1, cows were allotted to 2 treatments: (1) GnRH (100 μg) given approximately 12 h after initiation of estrus (n = 5); and (2) Control (n = 5). Blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals for 6 h at 12 (blood sampling period 1), 26 (blood sampling period 2), 40 (blood sampling period 3), 54 (blood sampling period 4), and 68 (blood sampling period 5) h after onset of estrus. Daily blood samples were collected for 17 d. In Experiment 2, cows were allotted into 2 treatments: GnRH administered 10 to 11 h (n = 10) or 14 to 15 h (n = 10) after onset of estrus. Daily blood samples were collected for 17 d. Cows treated with GnRH tended (P ≤ 0.075) to have greater LH release during blood sampling period 1, tended (P = 0.095) to have fewer pulses during blood sampling period 2, tended (P = 0.067) to have greater concentrations of progesterone, and had an earlier (P = 0.05) increase in progesterone than control cows. Cows treated with GnRH 10 to 11 h after onset of estrus had greater (P = 0.01) progesterone and an earlier (P = 0.04) increase in progesterone than cows treated 14 to 15 h. In conclusion, timing of GnRH treatment following onset of estrus influenced pulses of LH and subsequent progesterone.     

Effects of oestradiol benzoate injections, exposure to the boar and age on the attainment of puberty in the gilt

Thirty large white cross Landrace prepubertal gilts from five litters were allocated at random within litters to one of six treatment. All the gilts were given three daily intramuscular injections of 6 micrograms/kg liveweight of oestradiol benzoate but the first injection was given at either 100 days, 120 days, 140 days, 160 days, 180 days or 200 days old. From the time the first oestrogen injection was given, until the end of the experiment, the gilts were allowed daily contact with a boar for 20 minutes. The gilts were mated with a mature boar at the appearance of the second oestrus and they were slaughtered 20 days later. The numbers of gilts ovulating in the treatment groups were determined from plasma progesterone concentrations measured twice weekly throughout the experiment. The numbers of gilts ovulating within 10 days of the oestradiol benzoate injections were 3 of 5, 1 of 5, 0, 0, 3 of 5 and 1 of 5, respectively, in the groups first treated at 100 days, 120 days, 140 days, 160 days, 180 days and 200 days old. For those gilts which were successfully mated, no significant differences were observed between the treatment groups in the number of viable embryos per gilt.     

Endogenous opioid suppression of release of luteinizing hormone during suckling in postpartum anestrous beef cows

Beef cows were used to determine if suckling influences release of LH via endogenous opioids at 28 +/- 4 d after parturition. Cows of similar weight and body condition (6.8 +/- .1, 1 = emaciated, 9 = obese) were assigned randomly to five groups (n = 6 to 7): 1) control-suckled/saline (suckled 15 min every 6 hr for 48 hr); 2) control-suckled/naloxone; 3) calf-removal/saline (calf removal for 52 hr); 4) calf-removal/naloxone; and 5) control-suckled/GnRH (Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone). At 0 hr, saline was administered to all cows. This treatment was continued at 6 hr intervals for 24 hr. Either naloxone (0.5 mg/kg), GnRH (40 ng/kg) or saline was administered to cows in their respective groups every 6 hr during the ensuing 24-hr period in calf-removal groups, or immediately preceding each suckling episode in the control-suckled groups. Blood samples for analysis of luteinizing hormone (LH) were collected at 15-min intervals for 1 hr prior to and 3 hr after treatment at 0, 24, 36 and 48 hr. Cows were observed for estrus twice daily. All cows in the control-suckled/GnRH group released LH (P less than .05) in response to exogenous GnRH, indicating the presence of releasable quantities of the gonadotropin. Mean concentrations of LH were not effected (P greater than .05) by the control-suckled regime. However, calf-removal alone, or in combination with naloxone, increased (P less than .05) mean concentrations of LH by 48 hr.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The value of progesterone, oestradiol benzoate and cloprostenol in controlling the timing of oestrus and ovulation in dairy cows and allowing successful fixed-time insemination

The relative merits of three hormone treatments of dairy cows: (1) intravaginally administered progesterone and oestradiol benzoate; (2) intravaginally administered progesterone and injected cloprostenol; and (3) injected cloprostenol; begun 35-75 days after calving and designed to synchronize oestrus and ovulation and allow successful artificial insemination (AI) at fixed times, have been assessed utilizing information from progesterone concentrations in milk. From this it was concluded that 89% of the cows had ovulated one to three times between calving and the beginning of treatment. Treatment (2) was more effective than (1) in synchronizing ovulation. This was due to the fact that when treatments began early in the ovulation cycle, the requirement for a rapidly effective luteolytic agent was provided by cloprostenol but not by oestradiol benzoate. Treatment (2) was also more effective than (3) in synchronizing ovulation. This is interpreted as meaning that progesterone treatment for 12 days had a beneficial effect in restoring normal cyclic ovarian function in the cows after calving. Whilst cloprostenol administered alone did not have this beneficial effect, there is no evidence that it had a detrimental effect. Based on all cows in treatment groups, the proportion that became pregnant to the fixed-time AI was significantly greater after treatment (2) than after (1), but when based on numbers of cows with synchronized ovulation, there were no significant differences among treatments in the proportions becoming pregnant. The progesterone/cloprostenol treatment had a disadvantage in that when begun during the 11-22 day period of the ovulation cycle, so resulting in a long, total period of suppression of ovulation (mean, 32.1 days), fertility to the fixed-time AI was poor despite effective synchronization of ovulation. Ovulation cycles immediately following the failed, fixed-time AI were normal, both in length and in maximum, luteal-phase progesterone concentration and indicated normal corpus luteum function. Thus the infertility could be ascribed neither to poor timing of AI nor to gross degeneration of follicles prior to their synchronized ovulation following the prolonged suppression of ovulation. The 12-day progesterone treatments when given to anovulatory cows gave, within 5.5 h of their beginning, a concentration of progesterone in milk that was not significantly different from the maximum reached. This concentration declined during the 12 days of the treatment but remained above pretreatment level until 5.5 h after treatment withdrawal; the maximum reached was about half that in normal ovulation cycles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

日粮能量对初情期前母猪外周血清FSH、LH释放的影响

选杜长大三元杂交母猪24头(140日龄)分3个组,高能组、中能组、低能组。试验处理20 d,每5 d采血1次,离心,-20℃冰箱储存,然后放射免疫分析(RIA)。结果表明:外周血浆FSH、LH浓度在不同日粮能量水平饲养后,高能组急剧上升,到第10天达到高峰,然后逐渐下降,在处理第20天接近恢复试验前水平。低能组缓慢降低,第10天到最低点,然后逐渐恢复,在处理第20天接近恢复试验前水平。外周血浆FSH、LH浓度在高能组与低能组于处理第5天差异显著(P<0.05),第10天差异极显著(P<0.01),说明能量通过下丘脑-垂体-卵巢轴影响初情期前母猪生殖机能。     

Lack of LH response to oestradiol treatment in cows with cystic ovarian disease and effect of progesterone treatment or manual rupture.

The luteinising hormone (LH) surge in response to 1 mg oestradiol benzoate intramuscular injection was studied on 67 occasions in 45 cows with cystic ovarian disease 20 to 150 days post partum. Cows diagnosed as having luteal cysts were given 500 micrograms cloprostenol intramuscularly 24 hours before oestradiol, to induce luteolysis. Oestradiol benzoate was also given to eight post partum acyclic and eight cyclic cows and in all these cases a control LH response was characterised for comparison. Eight of 17 cows with luteal cysts (47 per cent), and 10 of 21 cows with follicular cysts (48 per cent), released LH in response to oestradiol. Some cows with cysts were given one of two treatments. Seven cows with follicular cysts were treated with a progesterone-releasing device (PRID) for seven days: all responded to a second oestradiol treatment given 24 hours after removal of the PRID. Luteal cysts in three cows and follicular cysts in nine cows were ruptured manually: only one cow (a luteal case) responded to the second oestradiol treatment given 24 hours after manual rupture. In eight cows initially diagnosed with luteal cysts, cloprostenol was not given and plasma progesterone concentration at the time of oestradiol treatment was high (over 0.9 ng ml-1): none released LH in response to oestradiol. As manual rupture did not improve the LH response to oestradiol, it is concluded that the defective LH response to oestradiol in cows with cystic ovarian disease was not influenced in the short-term by cyst fluid contents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Synchronisation of oestrus and reproductive performance of dairy cows following administration of oestradiol benzoate or gonadotrophin releasing hormone during a synchronised pro-oestrus

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB) administered following a synchronised pro-oestrus on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows and the submission rates of non-pregnant cows following resynchronisation. DESIGN: Cohort study. PROCEDURE: Lactating Holstein cows enrolled in a controlled breeding program were first treated with an intravaginal progesterone releasing insert (IVP4) for 8 days, 2.0 mg of ODB intramuscular (i.m.) at device insertion (Day 0), an analogue of PGF2alpha at device removal and either 1.0 mg of ODB i.m., 24 h after device removal (ODB group, n = 242), or 0.25 mg of a GnRH agonist (GnRH group, n = 152) injected i.m. approximately 34 h after device removal. Every cow was artificially inseminated between 49 and 56 h after removal of its insert (Day 10). Cows detected in oestrus 1 day after artificial insemination (AI) that were not detected in oestrus on the previous day were re-inseminated on that day. All cows treated on Day 0 were resynchronised for reinsemination by insertion of a used IVP4 device on Day 23. Oestradiol benzoate at a dose of 1.0 mg was administered i.m. at the time of device insertion. Inserts were removed 8 days later (Day 31) and 1.0 mg of ODB was injected i.m. 24 h later. Those cows detected in oestrus between Days 31 and 35 were artificially inseminated. On Day 46 these cows were resynchronised for a third round of AI by insertion of an IVP4 device, used previously to synchronise cows for the first and second rounds of AI, and administration of 1.0 mg of ODB i.m.. Eight days later inserts were removed. Cows detected in oestrus between Days 54 and 58 were artificially inseminated. Bulls were run with the herd between rounds of AI and removed after 21 weeks of mating. RESULTS: Treatment with ODB or GnRH at the first synchronised pro-oestrus did not significantly alter the reproductive performance over three rounds of AI or over a 21-week breeding period. Treatment also did not alter submission rates at the second round of AI or the proportion of non-pregnant and non-return cows ('phantom' cows) detected and did not result in significant differences in concentrations of progesterone in plasma 10 and 18 days after removal of inserts at the first round of AI. Treatment with GnRH reduced the proportion of cows detected in oestrus at the first round of AI (36.2 vs 97.5%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administration of GnRH compared to ODB at a synchronised pro-oestrus results in similar reproductive performance. Treatment with GnRH reduced the proportion of cows detected in oestrus following treatment. This may offer advantages to the way AI is managed by enabling insemination at a fixed-time and removing the need for the detection of oestrus.     

Effects of progesterone and weaning on LH and FSH responses to naloxone in postpartum beef cows

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of naloxone, an endogenous opioid receptor antagonist, on LH and FSH secretion in postpartum beef cows. In Experiment 1, 24 cows were divided into three equal groups. On day 15 postpartum, all cows were bled for 8 hr at 10 min intervals to evaluate LH secretory parameters. On day 18 postpartum, three treatments were administered: (a) saline at 0730 and 1130 hr; (b) 275 mg naloxone at 0730 and 1130 hr; (c) naloxone as in (b) above, plus this group was also treated with 50 mg progesterone (P4) twice daily from day 16 to day 19. In each treatment, jugular vein samples were collected at 10 min intervals from 0800 to 1600 hr. On day 19 the same treatments were administered at the same times, however, all cows were given 25 micrograms GnRH at 1200 hr to evaluate the LH secretory response. Naloxone increased mean LH concentration (P less than .05) and tended to increase pulse amplitude and frequency compared to controls. However, the most dramatic difference was due to P4 treatment which suppressed mean LH, pulse amplitude and frequency. Treatments had no effect on LH secretion in response to a 25 micrograms dose of GnRH. In Experiment 2, the effects of suckling on the naloxone response were examined in 16 postpartum cows. On day 21 postpartum, blood was collected at 10 min intervals for 8 hr and then calves were removed from half the cows. After 3 days of calf removal, all cows were sampled at 10 min intervals for 4 hr; then naloxone was injected after each 10 min sample at a dose rate of 200 mg/hr (33 mg per injection). Naloxone treatment and sampling continued for an additional 8 hr. Calf removal alone had very little effect on LH pulsatility. However, naloxone resulted in increased pulse frequency and mean LH compared to the control period. We conclude that LH release in the early postpartum cow is partially regulated by endogenous opioid peptides. We were unable to detect any effects on FSH secretion nor on pituitary sensitivity to exogenous GnRH.     

Reproductive performance of dairy cows not detected in oestrus but with a detectable corpus luteum, in response to treatment with progesterone, oestradiol benzoate and prostaglandin F2alpha

AIM: To determine if the reproductive performance of dairy cows not previously detected in oestrus but with a detectable corpus luteum before the planned start of mating (PSM), could be improved by treatment with progesterone, oestradiol benzoate (ODB) and prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF). METHODS: Cows in 18 herds which had not been detected in oestrus, but which had a detectable corpus luteum present at veterinary examination 7 days prior to the PSM (Day -7), were allocated to 1 of 2 groups. Treated cows (n=232) received an injection of 2 mg ODB and an intravaginal progesterone releasing device (CIDR insert) on Day -7, and an injection of PGF on the day of insert removal 7 days later (Treated group). The Control group (n=243) remained untreated. Cows were mated to detected oestrus from Day 0, and conception dates confirmed by manual palpation or transrectal ultrasonography. RESULTS: During the first 7 days of mating, 37.4% of Control cows and 65.9% of Treated cows were inseminated on detection of oestrus (p<0.001). Pregnancy rates for this period were 20.4% and 36.3%, respectively (p=0.001). Conception rates to first insemination, pregnancy rates after 21 days of mating and at the end of the mating period were similar between groups (p>0.1). Median interval from the PSM to conception did not differ between treatment groups (24 and 23 days for Control and Treated, respectively, p>0.1). CONCLUSION: Treating postpartum dairy cows which had not previously been detected in oestrus but which had a detectable corpus luteum, with progesterone, ODB and PGF did not significantly improve their reproductive performance compared with no hormonal intervention. KEY WORDS: dairy cattle, postpartum, anoestrous, reproduction, progesterone treatment.