Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine,MK-467 and their combination following intramuscular administration in male cats

Objective

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine, MK-467 and their combination following intramuscular (IM) administration to cats.

Cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine,with or without MK-467, following intravenous administration in cats

Objective

To characterize the cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine, with or without MK-467, following intravenous (IV) administration in cats.

The impact of MK-467 on sedation,heart rate and arterial blood pressure after intramuscular coadministration with dexmedetomidine in conscious cats

Objective

To study the effects of MK-467, a peripheral α₂-adrenoceptor antagonist, on sedation, heart rate and blood pressure after intramuscular (IM) coadministration with 25 μg kg^?1 of dexmedetomidine in cats.

Sedative and antinociceptive effects of dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine after oral transmucosal or intramuscular administration in cats

ObjectiveTo compare sedation and antinociception after oral transmucosal (OTM) and intramuscular (IM) administration of a dexmedetomidine-buprenorphine combination in healthy adult cats.Study designRandomized, ‘blinded’ crossover study, with 1 month washout between treatments.AnimalsSix healthy neutered female cats, weighing 5.3–7.5 kg.MethodsA combination of dexmedetomidine (40 μg kg^?1) and buprenorphine (20 μg kg^?1) was administered by either the OTM (buccal cavity) or IM (quadriceps muscle) route. Sedation was measured using a numerical rating scale, at baseline and at various time points until 6 hours after treatment. At the same time points, analgesia was scored using a dynamic and interactive visual analogue scale, based on the response to an ear pinch, and by the cat’s response to a mechanical stimulus exerted by a pressure rate onset device. Physiological and adverse effects were recorded, and oral pH measured. Signed rank tests were performed, with significance set at p < 0.05. Data are presented as median and range.ResultsThere were no differences in sedation or antinociception scores between OTM and IM dosing at any of the time points. Nociceptive thresholds increased after both treatments but without significant difference between groups. Buccal pH remained between 8 and 8.5. Salivation was noted after OTM administration (n = 2) and vomiting after both OTM (n = 4), and IM (n = 3) dosing.Conclusions and clinical relevanceIn healthy adult cats, OTM administration of dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine resulted in comparable levels of sedation and antinociception to IM dosing. The OTM administration may offer an alternative route to administer this sedative-analgesic combination in cats.     

Cardiopulmonary effects of an infusion of remifentanil or morphine in horses anesthetized with isoflurane and dexmedetomidine

ObjectiveTo examine the cardiopulmonary effects of infusions of remifentanil or morphine, and their influence on recovery of horses anesthetized with isoflurane and dexmedetomidine.Study designRandomized crossover study with 7-day rest periods.AnimalsSix adult horses (507 ± 61 kg).MethodsAfter the horses were sedated with xylazine, anaesthesia was induced with ketamine and diazepam, and maintained with isoflurane. After approximately 60 minutes, a dexmedetomidine infusion was started (0.25 μg kg^?1 then 1.0 μg^?1 kg^?1 hour^?1) in combination with either saline (group S), morphine (0.15 mg kg^?1 then 0.1 mg kg^?1 hour^?1; group M), or remifentanil (6.0 μg kg^?1 hour^?1; group R) for 60 minutes. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide tension, and end-tidal isoflurane concentration were recorded every 5 minutes. Core body temperature, cardiac output, right ventricular and arterial blood-gas values were measured every 15 minutes. Cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), intrapulmonary shunt fraction, alveolar dead space, oxygen delivery and extraction ratio were calculated. Recoveries were videotaped and scored by two observers blinded to the treatment. Data were analyzed using repeated measures anova followed by Dunnett’s or Bonferroni’s significant difference test. Recovery scores were analyzed using a Kruskal–Wallis test.ResultsNo significant differences were found among groups. Compared to baseline, heart rate decreased and SVR increased significantly in all groups, and cardiac index significantly decreased in groups S and M. Hemoglobin concentration, oxygen content and oxygen delivery significantly decreased in all groups. The oxygen extraction ratio significantly increased in groups M and R. Lactate concentration significantly increased in group S. Recovery scores were similar among groups.Conclusions and clinical relevanceDexmedetomidine alone or in combination with remifentanil or morphine infusions was infused for 60 minutes without adverse effects in the 6 healthy isoflurane-anesthetized horses in this study.     

Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine in isoflurane-anesthetized cats

ObjectiveTo characterize the hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine in isoflurane-anesthetized cats.Study designProspective experimental study.AnimalsSix healthy adult female cats weighing 4.6 ± 0.8 kg.MethodsDexmedetomidine was administered intravenously using target-controlled infusions to maintain nine plasma concentrations between 0 and 20 ng mL^?1 in isoflurane-anesthetized cats. The isoflurane concentration was adjusted for each dexmedetomidine concentration to maintain the equivalent of 1.25 times the minimum alveolar concentration, based on a previous study. Heart rate, systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, body temperature, and cardiac output were measured at each target plasma dexmedetomidine concentration. Additional variables were calculated. Arterial and mixed-venous blood samples were collected for blood gas, pH, and (on arterial blood only) electrolyte, glucose and lactate analysis. Plasma dexmedetomidine concentration was determined for each target. Pharmacodynamic models were fitted to the data.ResultsHeart rate, arterial pH, arterial bicarbonate concentration, mixed-venous PO₂, mixed-venous pH, mixed-venous hemoglobin oxygen saturation, cardiac index, stroke index, and venous admixture decreased following dexmedetomidine administration. Arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure, packed cell volume, PaO₂, PaCO₂, arterial hemoglobin concentration, mixed-venous PCO₂, mixed-venous hemoglobin concentration, ionized calcium concentration, glucose concentration, rate-pressure product, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance indices, left ventricular stroke work index, arterial oxygen concentration, and oxygen extraction increased following dexmedetomidine administration. Most variables changed in a dexmedetomidine concentration-dependent manner.Conclusion and clinical relevanceThe use of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct is expected to produce greater negative hemodynamic effects than a higher, equipotent concentration of isoflurane alone.     

Hemodynamic effects of intravenous lidocaine in isoflurane anesthetized cats

Lidocaine dose‐dependently decreases the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane in cats. The purpose of this study was to determine the hemodynamic effects of six lidocaine plasma concentrations in isoflurane anesthetized cats. Six cats were studied. After instrumentation, end‐tidal isoflurane concentration was set at 1.25 times the individual minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), which was determined in a previous study. Lidocaine was administered intravenously to target pseudo‐steady state plasma concentrations of 0, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 μg ml^–1, and isoflurane concentration was reduced to an equipotent concentration, determined in a previous study. Cardiovascular variables; blood gases; PCV; total protein and lactate concentrations; and lidocaine and monoethylglycinexylidide concentrations were measured at each lidocaine target concentration, before and during noxious stimulation. Derived variables were calculated. Data were analyzed using a repeated measures anova , followed by a Tukey test for pairwise comparisons where appropriate. One cat was excluded from analysis because the study was aborted at 7 μg ml^–1 due to severe cardiorespiratory depression. Heart rate, cardiac index, stroke index, right ventricular stroke work index, total protein concentration, mixed‐venous PO₂ and hemoglobin oxygen saturation, arterial and mixed‐venous bicarbonate concentrations, and oxygen delivery were significantly lower during lidocaine administration than when no lidocaine was administered. Mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance indices, PCV, arterial and mixed‐venous hemoglobin concentrations, lactate concentration, arterial oxygen concentration, and oxygen extraction ratio were significantly higher during administration of lidocaine than when no lidocaine was administered. Most changes were significant at lidocaine target plasma concentrations of 7 μg ml^–1 and above. Noxious stimulation did not significantly affect most variables. Despite significantly decreasing in inhalant requirements, when combined with isoflurane, lidocaine produces greater cardiovascular depression than an equipotent dose of isoflurane alone. The use of lidocaine to reduce isoflurane requirements is not recommended in cats.     

Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine during administration of vatinoxan in male neutered cats anesthetized with isoflurane

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist, and vatinoxan is an alpha-2 antagonist believed to poorly cross the blood–brain barrier in cats. Dexmedetomidine–vatinoxan combinations are of interest in anesthetized cats because the anesthetic sparing effect of dexmedetomidine may be preserved while vatinoxan attenuates the adverse cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in cats during administration of isoflurane and vatinoxan. Six healthy adult male castrated cats were anesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen. Vatinoxan was administered using a target-controlled infusion system intended to maintain a plasma concentration of 4 µg/ml. Dexmedetomidine, 35 µg/kg was administered intravenously over 5 min. Plasma dexmedetomidine and vatinoxan concentrations were measured at selected time points ranging from prior to 8 hr after dexmedetomidine administration using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Compartment models were fitted to the time-concentration data using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. A three-compartment model best fitted the data. Typical value (% interindividual variability) for the three-compartment volumes (ml/kg), the metabolic clearance and the two intercompartment distribution clearances (ml min⁻¹kg⁻¹) were 168 (259), 318 (35), 1,425 (18), 12.4 (31), 39.1 (18), and 29.6 (17), respectively. Mean ± standard deviation plasma vatinoxan concentration was 2.6 ± 0.6 µg/ml.     

Comparison of three doses of dexmedetomidine with medetomidine in cats following intramuscular administration

Cats ( n  = 6) were administered dexmedetomidine (DEX) and medetomidine (MED) at three different dose levels in a randomized, blinded, cross-over study. DEX was administered at 25, 50 and 75 μg/kg (D25, D50 and D75), corresponding to MED 50, 100 and 150 μg/kg (M50, M100 and M150). Sedation, analgesia and muscular relaxation were scored subjectively. Heart and respiratory rates and rectal temperature were measured. Corresponding doses of DEX and MED were compared. Effects were also compared between dose levels for each compound. At dose level 2 (D50-M100), the duration of effective clinical sedation was significantly shorter after DEX (202.5±16.0 min) than after MED (230.0±41.2 min). Proceeding from D50-M100 to D75-M150, the duration of effective clinical sedation was increased more after DEX (by 57.5±38.4 min) than after MED (by 14.2±41.9 min) Increasing from D50-M100 to D75-M150, heart rate was further decreased after DEX (by 8.1±13.4%) but not after MED. There was no statistically significant difference between corresponding doses of DEX and MED for any of the other parameters studied. Changes in sedation, analgesia and muscular relaxation were dose-dependent. It was concluded that anaesthetic effects of medetomidine in cats are probably due entirely to its d-isomer and that dexmedetomidine at 25, 50 and 75 μg/kg induces dose-dependent sedation, analgesia and muscular relaxation of clinical significance in cats.     

Sedative and analgesic effects of buprenorphine,combined with either acepromazine or dexmedetomidine,for premedication prior to elective surgery in cats and dogs

ObjectiveTo evaluate the sedative and analgesic effects of intramuscular buprenorphine with either dexmedetomidine or acepromazine, administered as premedication to cats and dogs undergoing elective surgery.Study designProspective, randomized, blinded clinical study.AnimalsForty dogs and 48 cats.MethodsAnimals were assigned to one of four groups, according to anaesthetic premedication and induction agent: buprenorphine 20 μg kg^?1 with either dexmedetomidine (dex) 250 μg m^?2 or acepromazine (acp) 0.03 mg kg^?1, followed by alfaxalone (ALF) or propofol (PRO). Meloxicam was administered preoperatively to all animals and anaesthesia was always maintained using isoflurane. Physiological measures and assessments of pain, sedation and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) were made before and after premedication, intraoperatively, and for up to 24 hours after premedication. Data were analyzed with one-way, two-way and mixed between-within subjects anova, Kruskall–Wallis analyses and Chi squared tests. Results were deemed significant if p ≤ 0.05, except where multiple comparisons were performed (p ≤ 0.005).ResultsCats premedicated with dex were more sedated than cats premedicated with acp (p < 0.001) and ALF doses were lower in dex cats (1.2 ± 1.0 mg kg^?1) than acp cats (2.5 ± 1.9 mg kg^?1) (p = 0.041). There were no differences in sedation in dogs however PRO doses were lower in dex dogs (1.5 ± 0.8 mg kg^?1) compared to acp dogs (3.3 ± 1.1 mg kg^?1) (p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups with respect to pain scores or MNT for cats or dogs.ConclusionChoice of dex or acp, when given with buprenorphine, caused minor, clinically detectable, differences in various characteristics of anaesthesia, but not in the level of analgesia.Clinical relevanceA combination of buprenorphine with either acp or dex, followed by either PRO or ALF, and then isoflurane, accompanied by an NSAID, was suitable for anaesthesia in dogs and cats undergoing elective surgery. Choice of sedative agent may influence dose of anaesthetic induction agent.     

Effects of intramuscular vatinoxan (MK-467), co-administered with medetomidine and butorphanol,on cardiopulmonary and anaesthetic effects of intravenous ketamine in dogs

ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of intramuscular (IM) co-administration of the peripheral α₂-adrenoceptor agonist vatinoxan (MK-467) with medetomidine and butorphanol prior to intravenous (IV) ketamine on the cardiopulmonary and anaesthetic effects in dogs, followed by atipamezole reversal.Study designRandomized, masked crossover study.AnimalsA total of eight purpose-bred Beagle dogs aged 3 years.MethodsEach dog was instrumented and administered two treatments 2 weeks apart: medetomidine (20 μg kg^–1) and butorphanol (100 μg kg^–1) premedication with vatinoxan (500 μg kg^–1; treatment MVB) or without vatinoxan (treatment MB) IM 20 minutes before IV ketamine (4 mg kg^–1). Atipamezole (100 μg kg^–1) was administered IM 60 minutes after ketamine. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial (MAP) and central venous (CVP) pressures and cardiac output (CO) were measured; cardiac (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVRI) indices were calculated before and 10 minutes after MVB or MB, and 10, 25, 40, 55, 70 and 100 minutes after ketamine. Data were analysed with repeated measures analysis of covariance models. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sedation, induction, intubation and recovery scores were assessed.ResultsAt most time points, HR and CI were significantly higher, and SVRI and CVP significantly lower with MVB than with MB. With both treatments, SVRI and MAP decreased after ketamine, whereas HR and CI increased. MAP was significantly lower with MVB than with MB; mild hypotension (57–59 mmHg) was recorded in two dogs with MVB prior to atipamezole administration. Sedation, induction, intubation and recovery scores were not different between treatments, but intolerance to the endotracheal tube was observed earlier with MVB.Conclusions and clinical relevanceHaemodynamic performance was improved by vatinoxan co-administration with medetomidine–butorphanol, before and after ketamine administration. However, vatinoxan was associated with mild hypotension after ketamine with the dose used in this study. Vatinoxan shortened the duration of anaesthesia.     

Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine,MK‐467, and their combination following intravenous administration in male cats

This study characterized the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine, MK‐467, and their combination following intravenous bolus administration to cats. Seven 6‐ to‐year‐old male neutered cats, weighting 5.1 ± 0.7 kg, were used in a randomized, crossover design. Dexmedetomidine [12.5 (D12.5) and 25 (D25) μg/kg], MK‐467 [300 μg/kg (M300)] or dexmedetomidine (25 μg/kg) and MK‐467 [75, 150, 300 or 600 μg/kg—only the plasma concentrations in the 600 μg/kg group (D25M600) were analyzed] were administered intravenously, and blood was collected until 8 hours thereafter. Plasma drug concentrations were analyzed using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. A two‐compartment model best fitted the data. Median (range) volume of the central compartment (mL/kg), volume of distribution at steady state (mL/kg), clearance (mL min/kg) and terminal half‐life (min) were 342 (131–660), 829 (496–1243), 14.6 (9.6–22.7) and 48 (40–69) for D12.5; 296 (179–982), 1111 (908–2175), 18.2 (12.4–22.9) and 52 (40–76) for D25; 653 (392–927), 1595 (1094–1887), 22.7 (18.5–36.4) and 48 (35–60) for dexmedetomidine in D25M600; 117 (112–163), 491 (379–604), 3.0 (2.0‐4.5) and 122 (99‐139) for M300; and 147 (112‐173), 462 (403‐714), 2.8 (2.1–4.8) and 118 (97–172) for MK‐467 in D25M600. MK‐467 moderately but statistically significantly affected the disposition of dexmedetomidine, whereas dexmedetomidine minimally affected the disposition of MK‐467.     

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine or medetomidine in cats and their reversal with atipamezole

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the clinical effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) and medetomidine (MED) in cats, and their reversal with atipamezole (ATI). Study design Prospective blinded randomized multi-centre clinical trial. Animals One hundred and twenty client-owned cats. METHODS: Cats were randomly allocated to receive a single intramuscular (IM) injection of either DEX (0.04 mg kg(-1), n = 62) or MED (0.08 mg kg(-1), n = 58) for minor procedures requiring sedation and analgesia. Afterwards, ATI (0.2 mg kg(-1)) was administered IM to half the cats, randomly assigned. Prior to, during and after the procedure the sedative, analgesic and cardiorespiratory effects and body temperature were assessed. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine and MED produced clinically and statistically comparable effects. The intended procedure(s) could be performed in over 90% of cats. Sedation and analgesia were apparent within 5 minutes, peak effects were observed at approximately 30 minutes and spontaneous recovery occurred by 180 minutes of injection. Heart and respiratory rate and body temperature decreased significantly over time and had not returned to baseline values 180 minutes after administration. ATI administration completely reversed the sedative and analgesic effects, returned the heart rate to normal and prevented any further reductions in respiratory rate and body temperature in both DEX- and MED-treated cats. The reporting of adverse events was low and the most commonly observed event was vomiting (7%). No serious adverse events or concerns regarding safety were reported. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dexmedetomidine (0.04 mg kg(-1)) produced comparable sedative and analgesic effects to MED (0.08 mg kg(-1)) in cats. DEX produced adequate sedation and analgesia for radiography, grooming, dental care and lancing of abscesses. ATI fully reversed the clinical effects of DEX.     

Effect of dexmedetomidine and xylazine followed by MK-467 on gastrointestinal microperfusion in anaesthetized horses

Objective

To compare the effects of MK-467 during isoflurane anaesthesia combined with xylazine or dexmedetomidine on global and gastrointestinal perfusion parameters.

Effects of constant rate infusions of dexmedetomidine or MK-467 on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in dogs

Objective

To determine the effects of low and high dose infusions of dexmedetomidine and a peripheral α₂-adrenoceptor antagonist, MK-467, on sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) in dogs.