Breed-associated phenotypes in canine atopic dermatitis

Canine atopic dermatitis is a multifaceted disease, whose clinical presentation may be affected by numerous factors, including the genetic background of the animal, the environment, the offending allergens and flare factors. In particular, breed-associated differences have often been mentioned but never defined precisely. Using a large data set of atopic dogs, we document in this study the clinical presentation of nine often-affected breeds and demonstrate the existence of substantial differences between the clinical phenotype of each breed and the whole population. Some of the differences may be due to genetic differences while others are most likely to be associated with variations in environmental factors.     

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XXIV): allergen-specific immunotherapy.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) has been used for years to treat dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD) and humans with atopic diseases. The efficacy of ASIT has been well documented for humans with respiratory atopic diseases and stinging insect allergy, but its effectiveness seems more controversial for patients with AD. In spite of insufficient evidence derived from randomized controlled trials, multiple open studies and a large body of clinical observations suggest that ASIT is effective in controlling the clinical signs of dogs with AD. As a result of the scarcity of evidence from controlled trials, the true efficacy of ASIT, and the optimal protocols for allergen dose and frequency of injection are currently unknown. Allergen-specific immunotherapy nevertheless may be included in the treatment of canine AD because of its potential advantages and limited disadvantages compared to other forms of therapy. There is no evidence, however, for the preference of any specific treatment protocol. The predictive value of historical, clinical and immunologic features related to the efficacy of ASIT in dogs with AD are discussed in this paper. Adverse reactions, and the requirements for monitoring of patients receiving ASIT, then are reviewed and detailed. Finally, this review highlights aspects of ASIT where further research and controlled studies are needed.     

A prospective study on canine atopic dermatitis and food-induced allergic dermatitis in Switzerland

Canine atopic dermatitis sensu stricto and food-induced allergic dermatitis are common canine skin conditions, which are often considered clinically undistinguishable. Several attempts have been made to describe populations of atopic dogs and determine breed predisposition but the results were often biased by the use of hospital populations as control group. The present study aims to describe a population of Swiss atopic and food-allergic dogs and to compare it with a data set representing more than 85% of all Swiss dogs. The study, which was carried out during 1 year in several practices and teaching hospital in Switzerland, describes a group of 259 allergic dogs, determines breed predisposition for atopic dermatitis and food-induced allergic dermatitis, compares the clinical signs and features of both conditions, and outlines the clinical picture of five frequently affected breeds.     

Serum antibodies to Malassezia yeasts in canine atopic dermatitis

Significant numbers of humans with atopic dermatitis develop Malassezia-specific IgE. Immediate skin-test reactivity to Malassezia has been demonstrated in atopic dogs. The aim of this study was to compare the serum IgG and IgE response to Malassezia in atopic dogs with and without clinical evidence of Malassezia dermatitis and/or otitis, nonatopic dogs with clinical evidence of Malassezia dermatitis and/or otitis and healthy dogs. Cytology was used to diagnose clinically significant Malassezia dermatitis and otitis. Contact plate cultures confirmed the validity of this technique. Reproducible enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for Malassezia-specific IgG and IgE in canine serum were established. Atopic dogs had significantly higher serum IgG and IgE levels than either healthy dogs or nonatopic dogs with clinical evidence of Malassezia dermatitis and/or otitis. There was no significant difference in IgG and IgE levels between atopic dogs with and without clinical evidence of Malassezia dermatitis and/or otitis. The implications of these findings in the pathogenesis and management of canine atopic dermatitis are discussed.     

益生菌对犬异位性皮炎免疫调节机制的研究

本试验对使用益生菌治疗的21只异位性皮炎犬和9只健康犬进行调查,通过流式细胞术检测其外周血淋巴细胞FoxP3表达(即Treg的生成),ELISA试剂盒检测血清IL-10、TGF-β、IFN-γ和IgE浓度,并比较治疗前后患犬的瘙痒程度。结果表明,服用特殊益生菌使犬外周血淋巴细胞FoxP3表达升高,血清IL-10和IgE浓度分别升高和下降。且通过提高Treg细胞的数量控制异位性皮炎的发病。     

Current evidence of skin barrier dysfunction in human and canine atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a multifaceted disease resulting from a complex interaction between environmental and genetic factors. Both of these factors can shape skin barrier function and the immunological response of predisposed patients. There is increasing evidence that an impaired skin barrier plays a role in both human and canine AD. Although many primary skin barrier defects had already been documented in the past in humans, the recent identification of the filaggrin mutations and the fact that such mutations are now considered the most important risk factor for development of AD have further emphasized the relevance of epidermal dysfunction in human AD. Much less is known in veterinary medicine, but evidence is rapidly building to support a role for skin barrier dysfunction in canine AD. Canine AD shares many clinical and immunological similarities with its human counterpart. The similar distribution of clinical lesions and the importance of the epicutaneous route of allergen exposure provided the incentive to investigate the role of skin barrier impairments in canine AD. The purpose of this comparative review is to present the current evidence of barrier dysfunction in both human and canine AD.     

Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on canine atopic dermatitis

Twenty-nine dogs were included in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised trial and were orally supplemented for 10 weeks with either flax oil (200 mg/kg/day), eicosapentaenoic acid (50 mg/kg/day) and docosahexaenoic acid (35 mg/kg/day) in a commercial preparation, or mineral oil as a placebo. For each dog, clinical scores were determined based on a scoring system developed prior to the trial. Total omega-6 and omega-3 intake and the ratio of omega-6:omega-3 (omega-6:3) were calculated before and after the trial. The dogs' clinical scores improved in those supplemented with flax oil and the commercial preparation, but not in the placebo group. No correlation was identified between total fatty acid intake or omega-6:3 ratio and clinical scores. Based on the results of this study, the total intake of fatty acids or the omega-6:3 ratio do not seem to be the main factors in determining the clinical response.     

Evaluation of the safety of an abbreviated course of injections of allergen extracts (rush immunotherapy) for the treatment of dogs with atopic dermatitis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of an abbreviated course of injections of allergen extracts (rush immunotherapy) for the treatment of dogs with atopic dermatitis. ANIMALS: 30 dogs with atopic dermatitis examined at a veterinary dermatology referral practice for treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy. PROCEDURE: A catheter was placed in a vein in each dog. Dogs were constantly observed throughout the procedure. Allergen extracts were administered in increasing concentrations every 30 minutes for 6 hours to a maintenance concentration of 20,000 protein nitrogen units/ml. Epinephrine, oxygen, and emergency treatment were available as needed. RESULTS: In 22 (73%) dogs, rush immunotherapy safely replaced the prolonged induction period (15 weeks) of weekly injections that consists of increasing concentrations of allergen extract. In 7 (23%) dogs, the induction period was abbreviated to 4 weeks. Of the 8 dogs that developed problems during rush immunotherapy, increased pruritus necessitated premature cessation of rush immunotherapy in 7, and 1 developed generalized wheals. Oral administration of prednisolone (1 mg/kg of body weight) resulted in resolution of adverse effects in all 8 dogs. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rush immunotherapy performed by personnel at a veterinary hospital is a safe method for treatment of dogs with atopic dermatitis.     

Transmission electron microscopy studies in an experimental model of canine atopic dermatitis

Impairment of skin barrier function has been hypothesized in canine atopic dermatitis (AD). In this prospective, controlled study, the ultrastructure of the upper epidermal layers was investigated using an experimental model of canine AD. Seven atopic Beagles sensitized to Dermatophagoides farinae and four healthy Beagles were used as controls. Both normal and atopic dogs were challenged with D. farinae for 3 days. Clinical signs were scored and skin biopsies were taken from the inguinal area before and 3 days after allergen exposure. Samples were processed to enhance lipid visibility and evaluated by Transmission Electron Microscopy. Emphasis was placed on evaluation of the lipid lamellae (LL), and lamellar bodies (LB) of the stratum corneum.
After allergen challenge, atopic Beagles developed severe pruritic dermatitis while no skin lesions were noted in the controls. Ultrastructurally, before allergen challenge, atopic Beagles displayed focally severe abnormalities in LL organization and wider intercellular spaces containing abnormal lipid material. In atopic Beagles, LBs were frequently found inside corneocytes while this finding was not observed in the controls. After allergen challenge, further increase of intercellular spaces was observed in the stratum corneum of atopic Beagles while no appreciable changes were observed in the normal dogs. Intercellular spaces in atopic Beagles were filled with abundant amounts of abnormal lipid material and highly disorganized LL. It is concluded that baseline differences in the ultrastructure of the skin exist between normal and experimentally sensitized atopic Beagles and that these changes are aggravated by allergen challenge and the resulting flare-up of dermatitis.     

The study of canine atopic dermatitis involving the isolation of dogs

Twenty-seven pruritic dogs were used in this study. When a hypoallergenic diet was fed to these 27 dogs for six weeks, none of the dogs showed improvement of the pruritus. These dogs had a history and clinical signs of atopic dermatitis (AD) as defined by Prelaud's diagnostic criteria. Subsequently, the 27 dogs were isolated for observation for two weeks in the hospital. In the isolation room in the veterinary clinic, cages and tableware were all stainless steel, and carpet was not used. A hypoallergenic diet was continuously fed to the 27 dogs for two weeks, during which time they were kept in the isolation room. PVAS (Pruritus Visual Analog Scale) was performed prior to starting the isolation, at the start of the study and 2 weeks after starting the isolation. In 17 dogs (63%) the pruritus improved in the isolation room. A statistically significant reduction (p < 0.01) of PLS (Pruritus liners score) was recorded 2 weeks after isolation. It was hypothesized that the 17 dogs whose pruritus improved in the isolation room had AD caused by an environmental antigen that was not present in the isolation room. Pruritus of the remaining 10 dogs (37%) did not improve. For 6/10 dogs, the intradermal allergy testing was positive for an environmental antigen. For 4/10 dogs, the intradermal allergy testing was negative for all environmental antigens. Dogs for which sensitivity to an environmental antigen was not identified were thought to have atopic-like dermatitis.     

Requirement for additional treatment for dogs with atopic dermatitis undergoing allergen-specific immunotherapy

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) is one of the main treatments for atopic dermatitis in dogs, but it often requires additional treatments such as antibacterial and antifungal therapy for secondary bacterial and yeast infections, or antipruritic drugs to control the clinical signs or treat the adverse effects of the immunotherapy. Twenty-seven dogs enrolled in a study of ASIT were clinically assessed four times over a period of nine months; their requirement for treatment for secondary bacterial and yeast infections, for the administration of glucocorticoids as additional antipruritic therapy, and for the treatment of any adverse effects of the ASIT were evaluated. Twenty (74 per cent) of the dogs were treated for superficial bacterial pyoderma, 18 (66.6 per cent) required treatment for Malassezia species dermatitis on one or more occasions, eight (29.6 per cent) required treatment for otitis externa due to Malassezia species or bacteria, and eight required glucocorticoids to control their clinical signs. Five (18.5 per cent) of the dogs experienced adverse effects due to the ASIT and two required treatment with antihistamines (H1 receptor antagonists) in order to continue with the ASIT.     

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XII): the relationship of cutaneous infections to the pathogenesis and clinical course of canine atopic dermatitis.

Dogs and human beings with atopic dermatitis (AD) frequently exhibit concurrent skin infections with Staphylococcus sp. bacteria or Malassezia yeast, and treatment of such infections is an important facet of managing these patients. Staphylococci appear to colonize atopic skin readily, and bacterial products on the skin could augment cutaneous inflammation via immediate hypersensitivity responses to the bacteria, by superantigen-mediated lymphocyte activation, or other non-specific mechanisms. Similarly, skin colonization by Malassezia yeast could contribute to clinical signs of AD; yeast components could induce inflammation via non-specific mechanisms, such as alteration in mediator release, or via antigen-specific hypersensitivity reactions. Clinical and experimental evidence exists that secondary microbial infections can both initiate and perpetuate episodes of AD in dogs and humans, and could even participate in promotion of pro-allergic immunologic responses. Mechanistic details of these complex interactions are under extensive investigation in human beings; only a few observations have been extended to include dog with AD.