Journal standards

Abstract

Despite its many imperfections, the peer review process is a firmly established quality control system for scientific literature. It gives readers some assurance that the work and views that are reported meet standards that are acceptable to a journal. Maureen Revington’s editorial in a recent issue of the Australian Veterinary Journal (Revington 2002 Revington, ML. 2002. Peer review — What is it? Why use it?. Australian Veterinary Journal, 80: 604–5.  [Google Scholar]) gives a good concise “warts and all” overview of the process and is well worth reading.     

Re: Journal standards

Abstract

Extract

I refer to the correspondence by Dr Jackson (2003) Jackson, R. 2003. Journal standards. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 51: 199–199. [Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] in the August 2003 issue of the New Zealand Veterinary Journal, regarding citation of articles published in non-peer reviewed publications in this journal.     

猪场沙门氏菌控制新标准

沙门氏菌感染一直是一种令养猪生产者头痛的疾病。自2010年起,欧洲将提高养猪场沙门氏菌控制的标准。因此,欧洲养猪生产者必须意识到并在性价比和安全性上处理好他们所涉及的不断增加的食品安全法律义务。     

Journal review

Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1990. Edited by R. P. Poincelot. New York, Food Products Press. ISSN: 1044–0046.