共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Rabies has been diagnosed for the first time in the bat population of Ontario. In the course of a study involving 72 bats from 24 counties of the province, five big brown bats (E. fuscus) were found to be infected with rabies through the mouse inoculation test. At the present time, it does not look as if bats have been connected with the epizootic of sylvatic rabies in Ontario.
La rage est apparue pour la première fois chez les chauves-souris en Ontario. Au cours d'une étude qui a porté sur 72 de ces animaux provenant de 24 comtés de la province, l'inoculation d'animaux de laboratoire a permis confirmer la présence de la maladie chez cinq grosses chauves-souris brunes (E. fuscus). A date, il ne semble toutefois pas que les chauves-souris soient impliquées dans l'épizootie de rage sylvatique qui sévit en Orntario.
相似文献4.
M. Beauregard 《Canadian journal of veterinary research》1969,33(3):220-226
Six hundred and twenty-eight insectivorous bats originating from seven provinces were submitted to this Institute for rabies diagnosis between August 1, 1963 and December 31, 1967. Brain tissue was examined by the fluorescent antibody technique and the mouse infectivity test was carried out with brain, salivary gland, interscapular adipose tissue and kidney samples. Rabies virus was detected in 44 bats, 29 of which were from Ontario, 12 from British Columbia and three from Manitoba. Most of the positive cases were diagnosed in summer months. Seven species were represented among the specimens found to be rabid; there were 32 big brown bats, three hoary bats, three silver-haired bats, two little brown bats, one eastern pipistrelle, one Keen myotis and one red bat. Another bat which was not identified also proved to be infected with rabies. 相似文献
5.
6.
Perceptions and Practices of Mass Bat Exposure Events in the Setting of Rabies Among U.S. Public Health Agencies 下载免费PDF全文
C. H. Hsu C. M. Brown J. M. Murphy M. G. Haskell C. Williams K. Feldman K. Mitchell J. D. Blanton B. W. Petersen R. M. Wallace 《Zoonoses and public health》2017,64(2):127-136
Current guidelines in the setting of exposures to potentially rabid bats established by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) address post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP) administration in situations where a person may not be aware that a bite or direct contact has occurred and the bat is not available for diagnostic testing. These include instances when a bat is discovered in a room where a person awakens from sleep, is a child without an adult witness, has a mental disability or is intoxicated. The current ACIP guidelines, however, do not address PEP in the setting of multiple persons exposed to a bat or a bat colony, otherwise known as mass bat exposure (MBE) events. Due to a dearth of recommendations for response to these events, the reported reactions by public health agencies have varied widely. To address this perceived limitation, a survey of 45 state public health agencies was conducted to characterize prior experiences with MBE and practices to mitigate the public health risks. In general, most states (69% of the respondents) felt current ACIP guidelines were unclear in MBE scenarios. Thirty‐three of the 45 states reported prior experience with MBE, receiving an average of 16.9 MBE calls per year and an investment of 106.7 person‐hours annually on MBE investigations. PEP criteria, investigation methods and the experts recruited in MBE investigations varied between states. These dissimilarities could reflect differences in experience, scenario and resources. The lack of consistency in state responses to potential mass exposures to a highly fatal disease along with the large contingent of states dissatisfied with current ACIP guidance warrants the development of national guidelines in MBE settings. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
K A Clark 《Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association》1988,192(10):1404-1406
11.
12.
A. H. Corner M. Beauregard H. K. Mitchell 《Canadian journal of veterinary research》1960,24(12):364-365
13.
14.
The practicing veterinarian has a key role to play in rabies control in the maintenance of protection in the companion animal populations, in the education of the pet-owning community on rabies, and in the decision-making process that accompanies human exposure to potentially rabid animals. This role encompasses far more than the routine maintenance of health and well-being in pet animal populations. Although it is important to remain diligent in the immunization of domestic pets against rabies to provide a barrier between wildlife, the main reservoir of infection, and man, it is also important to be aware of the current trends in wildlife rabies within a region. Research is currently underway to investigate methods of immunizing wildlife populations, but the effective and widespread control of rabies in these species is still a long way off; in the meantime, there will be an increasing demand for practicing veterinarians to take the lead in the control of this most fearful zoonotic disease. 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
A. Servat J. Herr E. Picard‐Meyer L. Schley C. Harbusch C. Michaux J. Pir E. Robardet E. Engel F. Cliquet 《Zoonoses and public health》2015,62(1):7-10
Rabid bats are regularly reported in Europe, especially in countries that have implemented a bat surveillance network. In May 2013, bat rabies was evidenced for the first time in Luxembourg (southern city of Differdange). The rabies virus, an EBLV‐1b strain, was diagnosed in a serotine bat that bit a 29‐year‐old male person while he was asleep. The man received rapidly a post‐exposure RABV treatment and was put under strict medical supervision. 相似文献
20.